Professional Documents
Culture Documents
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEggt0ldQUI
video backup: https://yadi.sk/i/tzv2Mb5ekjsqQ
ties to the Kaiser Willhelm Institute and the practice of crypto-eugenics and the rise of overpopulation fearmongering and
the call by elitist after elitist after elitist to cull the world population.
Still, you wanted to believe that there was some basis of truth, something real and valuable in the single-minded obsession of
this hijacked environmental movement with manmade global warming.
Now, in November 2009, the last traces of doubt have been removed.
Last week, an insider leaked internal documents and emails from the Climate Research Unit of East Anglia University and
exposed the lies, manipulation and fraud behind the studies that supposedly show 0.6 degrees Celsius of warming over the
last 130 years. And the hockey stick graph that supposedly shows unprecedented warming in our times.
And the alarmist warning of impending climate disaster.
We now know that these scientists wrote programming notes in the source code of their own climate models admitting that
results were being manually adjusted.
We now know that values were being adjusted to conform to scientists' wishes, not reality.
We now know that the peer review process itself was being perverted to exclude those scientists whose work criticized their
findings.
We now know that these scientists privately expressed doubts about the science that they publicly claimed to be settled.
We now know, in short, that they were lying.
It is unknown as yet what the fallout will be from all of this, but it is evident that the fallout will be substantial.
With this crisis, however, comes an opportunity.
An opportunity to recapture the movement that the financiers have stolen from the people.
Together, we can demand a full and independent investigation into all of the researchers whose work was implicated in the
CRU affair.
We can demand a full re-evaluation of all those studies whose conclusions have been thrown into question by these
revelations, and all of the public policy that has been based on those studies.
We can establish new standards of transparency for scientists whose work is taxpayer funded and/or whose work effects
public policy, so that everyone has full and equal access to the data used to calculate results and all of the source code used
in all of the programs used to model that data.
In other words, we can reaffirm that no cause is worth supporting that requires deception for its propagation.
Even more importantly, we can take back the environmental movement.
We can begin to concentrate on the serious questions that need to be asked about the genetic engineering technology
whereby hybrid organisms and new, never-before-seen proteins that are being released into the biosphere in a giant,
uncontrolled experiment that threatens the very genome of life on this planet.
We can look into the environmental causes of the explosion in cancer and the staggering drops in fertility over the last 50
years, including the BPA in our plastics and the anti-androgens in the water.
We can examine regulatory agencies that are controlled by the very corporations they are supposedly watching over.
We can begin focusing on depleted uranium and the dumping of toxic waste into the rivers and all of the issues that we
once knew were part of the mandate of the real environmental movement.
Or we can, as some have, descend into petty partisan politics.
We can decide that lies are OK if they support 'our' side.
We can defend the reprehensible actions of the CRU researchers and rally around the green flag that has long since been
captured by the enemy.
It is a simple decision to make, but one that we must make quickly, before the argument can be spun away and
environmentalism can go back to business as usual.
We are at a crossroads of history. And make no mistake, history will be the final judge of our actions.
So I leave you today with a simple question:
Which side of history do you want to be on?
For The Corbett Report, this is James Corbett in western Japan.
https://www.corbettreport.com/articles/20091125_enviro_message.htm
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uEggt0ldQUI
related: The Pentagon, The Climate Elephant. The US Military Machine is the World's Worst Polluter of Greenhouse Gas
Emissions. The role of the US military is not on the agenda of the Paris COP21 Climate Conference
2