Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Summary
Acid fracturing and matrix acidizing are used as well-stimulation
processes for carbonated reservoirs. In matrix acidizing, a deep
penetration of wormholes around the well is required; in the acidfracturing process, fluid leak-off must be limited and wormholes
are prohibited. Laboratory tests are necessary to improve the
design of these operations.
Specific laboratory equipment was designed to reproduce
downhole flow conditions. Matrix acidizing is a constant flow rate
process, whereas acid in fracture is forced from the fracture wall to
the formation, a process occurring at a constant pressure drop. This
process was represented in the laboratory and a new tangential cell,
aiming at working with straight acids in reservoir temperature and
pressure conditions, was specially designed to handle this application. The first part of the paper presents a methodology for the
evaluation of acid/rock properties. Results of acid injections at
constant flow rates are compared to results obtained from injections at constant pressure drop. Experiments have been conducted
with limestone core samples of different petrophysical properties.
Performance of different acid formulations including straight
acids, emulsions, and gels was evaluated.
Results are discussed in terms of acid propagation rates and dissolution patterns. They are analyzed using x-ray computed tomography. They are classified into wormholes, i.e., branched patterns
of large extension, and compact ones. Finally, recommendations
are made concerning operating conditions favorable for matrix
acidizing. On the opposite, conditions are given to limit dissolution
and to restrict fluid loss for the acid fracturing application.
Introduction
HCl is injected into carbonate formation routinely to improve oil
production. The porous medium is not etched uniformly; unstable
dissolution channels are formed. Control of the formation of these
channels, commonly called wormholes, is the key to the success of
the treatments. In matrix acidizing, deep, highly ramified wormholes are required whereas in acid fracturing, compact patterns at
the fracture walls are preferred. This paper has several aims. The
primary objective is to set up an experimental methodology for
comparing different acid fluids for two acidizing applications. For
the matrix acidizing process, we provide a methodology and a
frame of reference for the interpretation of wormhole propagation
rates. This framework provides possible guidelines for evaluation
of new products. For acid fracturing, new equipment is designed to
reproduce representative downhole conditions. They are used for
evaluation of basic properties of gelled acids: fluid leak-off and
wormhole propagation rate.
Dissolution patterns in limestone are classified as compact,
wormholes, or uniform, depending on the relative influence of
flow rate with respect to the overall reaction rate. For highly reactive fluids like HCl in limestone, the effect of flow rate on the dissolution pattern is dominant. Experiments supported by analysis of
dissolution mechanisms at the pore level give the following correspondence between flow regimes and dissolution patterns.1
22
firm previous trends.2 If injection time is crucial to the cost of treatment, a high HCl concentration is better. However, in terms of
using acid, low concentrations are better.
Fig. 5 shows the effect of temperature. There is a strong effect
of temperature on the optimum injection rate. An increase in temperature shifts the optimum flow rate to higher values. Acid volume required to breakthrough increases, decreasing efficiency for
wormhole formation. Higher permeabilities require higher injection rates and higher volumes at the optimum (Fig. 6).
Scaling to the Reservoir. Previous results show clearly that optimum flow rate is associated with a wormhole maximum propagation distance. It follows that extrapolation of data to the reservoir
scale where core length is infinite cannot be obtained directly
from laboratory experiments. In particular, scaling of the optimum
flow rate by a factor aiming at maintaining the same interstitial
injection rate in the laboratory and in the field has no meaning; this
would result in a wormhole length comparable to the core length
used in the experiments. A recent review shows that, despite much
effort, models currently introduce too many simplifications to predict injection flow rates and volumes for a well treatment.15 These
oversimplifications fail to take into account relevant physical
mechanisms of wormhole formation and propagation and, therefore, models are not reliable enough for extrapolating laboratory
data to the reservoir.
However, experiments confirm qualitatively that high flow
rates are required to increase wormhole penetration.16 Therefore,
maximum flow rate provides maximum penetration. Note that this
cannot be achieved without an increase of the volume of acid
injected and considerable fluid loss along the wormhole walls.
Acknowledgments
We gratefully acknowledge the support of members of ARTEP, an
association of the French petroleum companies. We thank C. Schlitter,
D. Suida, and G. Thibaut, who performed the experimental work.
Nomenclature
A = core section
L = core length, L, m
t = breakthrough time, t, sec
k = permeability, L2
P = pressure difference imposed during a tangential experiment, m/Lt2, psi
Ca = leak-off coefficient, L/t
V = leak-off volume, L3
vi = interstitial velocity of injected solution in the tangential
device with respect to viscosity, permeability, and
pressure gradient, L/t
vw = interstitial velocity that would have the water in a
tangential injection experiment performed in the same
condition as with gel, L/t
vwh = wormhole or acid propagation velocity; it is the ratio of
the length of the core to the breakthrough time, L/t
vf = leak-off or filtration velocity, L/t
References
1. Daccord, G., Lenormand, R., and Litard, O.: Chemical Dissolution of
a Porous Medium by a Reactive Fluid1. Model for the Worm-holing
Phenomenon, and 2. Convection vs. Reaction Behavior Diagram,
Chem. Eng. Sci. (1993) 48, No. 1, 169.
2. Wang, Y., Hill, A.D., and Schechter, R.S.: The Optimum Injection Rate
for Matrix Acidizing of Carbonate Formations, paper SPE 26578 preFebruary 2001 SPE Production & Facilities
SPEPF
Brigitte Bazin is Senior Research Engineer in charge of wellstimulation studies in the Reservoir Engineering Dept. at the IFP
in Rueil-Malmaison, France. e-mail: brigitte.bazin@ifp.fr. Her
research interests are in well productivity and injectivity. She
holds a degree in chemical engineering from the Inst. Natl. des
Sciences Appliques.
29