Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ELI A. BLACKHOUSE
p lW
a Benjamin W. Turner,
Plaintiff
V.
LAUzuE CONNELLY
ftffiffiffif \dfiisl
MAR
Respondent
09
?CIJCI
iJllnra.-,--,
,
", 1, ...,,,r .il,rji,,
:.i_:;L;iAl
Lt..iilf
same o\
- including harassment -
fraud until his recent (February 6,2010) escape to Waterville, Maine. Irrespective of the ultimate
determination of the harassment definition
the plaintiff
asserts that an upstanding Court would eventually find the Defendant to have participated in an
Despite said conditions, the Defendant continues to require the Plaintiffto pay excessive
"rent" (i.e., extortion), violating Federai housing code; if he does not pay such a monthly sum
which has heretofore kept him restrained at the scene of 235 Water Street
he will not be
permitted to maintain property rights or protect the contents of his apartment: police harassment
would entail during a forcible entry and detainer action during a period of time in which the
Plaintiff remains a victim of police sexual assault, a criminal act concealed by the Augusta police
Department in concert u,ith the Augusta Housing Authority (shockingly, the AHA is the same
agency conducting the embezzlement portion of the housing fraud in question). This financial
limitations and additional expenses imposed by his iatrogenic disability, ancl b) the presence
organized housinq fraud simultaneously conducted by various State-run agencies.
of
disabled
as both Laurie Connelly and Cluis Vallee (of Vallee Real Estate)
insist upon engaging in on-site harassment of the Plaintiff in violation of both his Federal and
State disability rights
N4r. Blackhouse is
$875/mo.) while limited to an $852 monthly SSDI income. As a result of organized Federal
housing fraud, he cannot afford postage stamps or the basic means to participate in a pro se
protective action during a period of time in which criminal activity is going unaddressed by both
the District Attorney and the Office of the Maine Attorney General.
March 6,2010 | Maine Sdpreme Judicial Court: Docket No. KEN- l0-58
The Plaintiff now notes for the Court that the entire array of criminal activity is too
complex to elucidate in this appeal. However, the Court is advised that evidence of wrongdoing
is manifest upon simple examination of various records generated by both Laurie Connelly and
other entities attached to her organizatiofl, e.g., the Portland Housing Authority has consistently
refused to reinstate the Plaintiffs Section 8 housing choice subsidy despite its expiration having
occurred as a direct result of a violation of his disability rights; separately, Mr. Blackhouse has
been illegally denied transitional housing assistance via various agencies' faulty rendering
of
As Mr. Blackhouse has been required to file pro se, he now entreats the Court to
undertake any communication with the Defendants on his behalf. The Plaintiff is neither a
prosecutor nor a professional attomey and without such credentials, cannot evaluate any material
he distributes to the Defendants for its potential relevance to any criminal investisation now
necessary relative to the behaviors or business operations of the Connellys and their various
associates.
Additionally, the Plaintiff is a victim of sexual assault by an Augusta police officer and
notes that his status as such was mentioned in the PFH complaint he filed in District Court. The
docket listing generated by District Court in Augusta indicates that the lower court did not
distribute the full information to the Connellys, a decision which might have been informed by
the Plaintiffs safety and privacy relative to the assault.
any
charges now before the Court to be entirely distinct from criminal activity conducted by the TLC
of the building
participating in the human traffrcking ring already suffrciently described to the Maine Human
Rights Commission by Mr. Blackhouse.
and victim of
cuiminated in a series of criminal hospitalizations. The Plaintiff adds that he is presently the
target of a reprisal kidnapping conspiracy organized between a medical crime syndicate and the
Augusta Police Department. The Gardiner Police Department refused to assist Mr. Blackhouse in
the
"I
of
2A02 and
criminally restrained
of the
necessary purview
my rent-to-income ratio. Indeed, the amount of rent I have been forced to pay to
successive "owners"
March 6,2010 | Maine S'upreme Judicial Court: Docket No. KEN- 10-5g
and as such
cannot file the brief for Docket No. Ken-10-58 (Maine Supreme Court) pro se without fixed
housing, adequate personal transportation, and rights afforded other citizens, he entreats the
Court to:
ENFORCEMENT
A)
Order the appropriate State or Federal agency or judicial body to bring court
actions against the parties named in his initial MHRC complaint (Case No. H090545), erroneously dismissed by the Commission but emergently actionable
according to Maine statute;
B)
Assist Mr. Blackhouse's harassment lawsuit against Laurie Connelly, Docket No.
Ken-10-58 (now at Maine Supreme Judicial Court [sitting as the Law Court], i.e.,
this action);
C)
Order a proxy to serve as the settlement intermediary between Ms. Connelly and
the Plaintifl as Mr. Blackhouse can have no direct contact with the Defendant
March 6,2010 | Maine S'upreme Judicial Court Docket No. KEN- t 0-5g
without risking the faiiure of his health, and as he has been required proceed
to
with this actionpro
D)
se,.
E)
Refer any Federal criminal activity discovered by the court _ such Mr.
Blackhouse's 2002 kidnapping, torture, and criminal restraint within
the unlawful
premises of "P-6" at Maine Medical Center in Portland, Maine
- to the portland
field office of the FBI, and to instruct the Bureau to open a formal investigation
with Mr. Blackhouse's participation, and for the agency to coordinate their
efforts
with the US Attorney's offtce to whatever extent is usual and necessary;
F)
Gardiner
of
investigation and
receivership;
COMPENSATORY
G)
H)
J)
illegal eviction;
K)
and to cease
and desist all efforts to enter Apartment 8 of 235 Water Street, for any reason
whatsoever, including alleged showings of the apartment to prospective buyers or
L)
Order the Connellys not to attempt to enter the premises ofApt. 8 for any reason
whatsoever, including any reasons
ostensible or otherwise
- relating
to
"showing" the property (e.g., to prospective buyers of the building, now for sale),
asserting property rights, maintenance, and otherwise to treat the premises
8 as entirely separate from their ownership;
ofApt.
M)
Sell the property to Mr. Blackhouse pursuant to 5 MRSA $ 4613 (2) (B) (4),
and in a manner affordable to the Plaintiff, or to convey 235 Water Street
N)
O)
P)
Order the Connellys not to require the $4751mo. extortion they describe as "rent"
PROCEDURAL
The extorted SSDI gleanings that IvIr. Blackhouse was forced to pay during a period of time in which he was
wrongfully confined to the City of Gardiner - and out of reach of the court system - were laundered through the
previous owner's restaurant and bar (the Mad Dog Pub).
R-)
Alter Court procedures in light of Mr. Blackhouse's allegation that the activity by
successive landlords
civil, in origin,
S)
Provide the Plaintiffwith an exact copy of any and all material delivered by the
Court to the Connellys relative to Docket No. Ken-10-58 or the District Court
docket preceding it, and to provide such copies on an ongoing basis;
T)
Order that the Plaintiffis permitted to proceed with anonymity regarding his
current residence in Waterville, protecting the rights and interests of the
homeowner providing him with transitional shelter;
U)
Plaintiffin
protective anonymity;
TRANSPORTATION
V)
W)
\n2005;
Order the responsible party to provide Mr. Blackhouse with a new automobile for
his personal and Court-related use, which
will
- Ellen Heath -
refused to
X)
OTHER
Y)
or the
It is also unlikely that any specific regulation prohibits municipal emergency GA programs from paying for two
residences simultaneously. State laws provide GA adminisfators the ability to tailor emergency assistance
to
individual need, the nature ofthe emergency, andthe availability ofresources.
l0
commission
Multiple other necessary injunctive measures are emergently necessary but the details are
not listed herein because of time and filing restraints (the immediate. permanent closure of
Maine Medical Center, the Augusta Housing Authority, etc.).
The Plaintiff requests that any compensatory and recuperative awards and orders that arc
not immediately distributed by the Court after examination of this interlocutory appeal
are
administered instead through the FBI and/or the US Attorney (e.g., by the US Attorney's
victim/witness coordinator). He notes again that some forms of compensation are more readily
if
compensation
Defendant(s), he entreats the Court to order money and other forms of support to be delivered by
the various State or municipal agencies who have colluded to prevent him from receiving
sufftcient crime-related assistance.
He further notes that while Adult Protective Services has the mandate to order the various
violating agencies to provide restitution (e.g., the immediate restoration of his housing subsidy)
via direct intervention in such matters through the Courts, the Plaintiff has not been able to
access APS services because
including
a)
for victims of
operations,
neglect and
l1
APS
MW
Respectfully submitted by
On:
{Warr}ttrr, ?,DLCI
Filingpro
12
se