You are on page 1of 15
(rage tof 15) * onicivaL = ° 1 | PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP 2 [BEANS FANISH, Sit Bar 118086 nN coaggn ures a 7 sfx Neat ec DUGAS, Sate Bar No, 232498 peco4 2015 uu See Moen Boulevard, Suite 700 ‘sheniR. yOffeeniClerk 4]| Los Angeles, California 90025 X leper 00 ee ‘5]| Facsimile: 310.477.1699 6|| Attorneys for Plainttts 7 8.05719) 207 7 THR: 06705 12017 498, 120 aR @ 8 ‘SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA 9 COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, CENTRAL DISTRICT % 11] perer woLF-MILLESI, an individual; LEA | CaseNo. BC6 03365 ' Be 5 _ || WoLeMILESt, aged BOA ‘ me 12|/MAURER, ‘an individual; NINO MILLESI, a COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES page nor by a ou ‘his Guardian Ad Litem, Obes 13 | LEA WOLB-MILLEST, and GAETANO: 1 ‘NEGLIGENCE Mos WOLF-MLLESL aminor by and through is & 38 141] Guardians Ad item, PETER WOLF. 2, NEGLIGENT INFLICTION OF a I i 7 | MILLEST st ad tea WOLE! -MILLESI, EMOTIONAL DISTRESS ote a Plaintii, DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL ged ¥ * aero alia (O. CAITLYN JENNER, an individual, ; 18 || DOES 1 througk25, Er 19 || Defendant, 22, COMES NOW Pleintifis, PETER WOLF-MILLESI, an individual, LEA WOLp. Bas +23 |)MICLESL, an individual; BLGA MAURER, an individual; NINO MILLESI, minor Bae a 1 24 || through his Guardian Ad Litem LBA WOLF MIELEST; and GAETANO Iss 48 i. 125 || minor by and through his Guardians Ad Litem, PETER, ee g ts 26 || MILLESI (Hereafter “Plaintifis"), for causes of action against Defendants, CAITLYN § 27]| an individual, and DOES 1 through 25, iichusive, (hereafter “Defendants"), who complains and 28 | alleges as follows: s § B88 oz ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES oot 4 Rage ~ Dee ED = 1695966200 - Doo Type = OnE. SHO 16 {os angeles colts 90028 ainarnatta pion Panisk SHEA & BOYLE LLP no NenesBoyever Sute 700 ee ee) oe ‘GENERAL ALLEGATIONS 1. This personel injury action atises fiom 4 fout cat automobile collision which occurred on February 7,2015, 2. On February 7, 2015, stapproximately 12:00 p.m., Plaintiffe the Wolf-Mitlest Hiatniiy) were driviig, southbound in the #1 traffic Inne om Pacific Coast Highway State Route 1 Plaintiff PETER WOLF MILLEST was-opéiating & 2006 Black H2 Hummer, beating California icense plate number LACMBA (hereinafter ‘PLAINTIFFS’ VEHICLE"). Coming in the opposite dizection towards the Wolf-Millesi family was DEFENDANT CAITLYN JENNER (at the time formally named Bruce Jenner) operating a 2013 Cadillac Escalade, California license plate sumber 7AAF4E4. DEFENDANT JENNER was towing a vehicle trailer and off-road vehicle trailer license plate number ONGX355 (hereinafter collectively “DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE". 3: Plaintiff is iaformed and believes and based thereon alleges that DEFENDANT TENNER was inattentive and traveling at unsafe speed fortraffic conditions and caused a bigh- force collision with decesent Kitt Diane Howe, driving a 2006 Lexus LS 430 California license plate ranpler SVKRT33 (hereinafter “HOWE'S LEXUS"). HOWE’S LEXUS was then pushed into oncoitiing teste striking the WolfMillesi fimly hes-on. 4. PlaintiPis informed and believes aid baséd thereon alleges that due to the significant speed and force of DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE, JENNER wae unable to stop aftr the ist colsion axd contioued on andrear-endod another nortibound vehicle diven by Jssion Maric Steindorff. Ms: SteindorSf was driving a 2010 Toyota Prius, California license plate umber GNOYS95 (hercinalter "STEINDORFF'S PRIUS"). 5, Plaintffis informed and believes end based thereon alleges that Defendant TENNER wos at fanit for the SUBJECT INCIDENT whea she was inattentive, filled to keep a proper lookout, aid drove'at'an vasafe speed for road conditions in violation of California Vehicle [Code 922305. As result of Defendants’ negligence, the driver and occupants of Paints’ vebjole, RELER WOLE-MILLESL, LEA WOLF-MILLESI, ELGA MAURER; NINO MILLESI, and GAETANO WOLF-MILLBSI suffered signiticait peisonal injuries anid ethotional distres 2 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LEP Plainfiffé are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that at all times herein mentioned, 6. Defendants JENNER and DOBS 1 through 100, ilisive, and eal of them, owned, leased, managed, sisintsined, tepaired, entrusted and eontgolled DEFENDANTS VEHICLE, which was-used.as part of Defendants! businesses, Plaisitiffe are further informed and. believe, atd-thereon allege, that tall times herein mentioned, Defendant CAITLYN JENNER 'was the operator of DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE. 7 tL Plaindffs are.informed and believe, and thereon allege, that at all times mentioned || herein, Defendants, and each of them, including DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, and each of 9)|| them, were agents, servants, employees, successors in infevest, and/or joint ventures of their co- 40 || Defendants, and were, as such, acting within the coufse, scope, and authority of said agency, 11 | employment, and/or venture, Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereoa allege, that at all 12] times herein relevant, B 8 Defendant JENNER ves an employee and/or agent of Defendants DOES 1 14] thcougia 100, inclusive, and each of them, and was acting: withia the course snd scope ofher employment with Defendants DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, and each of them. 6 9. Plaintiffs are-informed and believe, afd thefeom allags, that at all times herein 17 |] televant, inchiding the tine of the SUBTECT INCIDENT collision, Defendant JENNER was awe & les Angelen Celts 25 1111 font‘narica Buenos Sute700, ioaT7AraDphone + S047 109 a 18 || driving the SUBJECT VEHICLE so she could peiforit the duties widlor antivities of her 19 |jemployment, geno, joins. vena, ‘and business relationship with Defendants DOES 1 through 20/100, inclusive, and each of them. Plaintiff is further informed and believés, and thereupon alleges, that Defendants DOES | through 100, inclusive, and each of them, specifically authorized, 22) permitted and required Defendant JENNER to use DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE for the purposes of 23 || the employment, agency, joint venture, and busisiess relationship between JENNER and DOES [- We 244/25, rr 25 10, Plaintitg PETER WOLF-MILLESI was, at all times herein relevant, a resident of 26 [the City of Malibu in the County of Los Angeles, State of California. TUT IINI 24) 1]. Plaintiff LEA WOLF-MILLESI was, at all times herein relevant,a resident of the 28 || City of Malibu in the Gounty of Los Angeles, State of Califomia. BR 3 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES erica Boule te 70 : k 3 & : 2 3 g PANISH SHEA & BOYER LL? m e @ 12, Plaintiff ELGA MAURER was, atall times herein relevant, axesident of Malibi in the County of Los Angsles, Stato of Califomi, 15, Plaintiff NINO MILLESI was, ot allies herein relevant, aresident of Molibu in she County of Los Angeles, State of California. 14, Plaintiff GEATANO WOLF-MILLESI was, at all times ficrcin rclevani, a resident of Malibu in the County of Los Angeles, State of Califorria. 15, Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege that at all times herein selevant; Defendant CAITLYN JENNER was a esideat of the City of Woodland Hills in the County of Les Angeles, State of Colifornia, At the time of the SUBJECT INCIDENT, CAITLYN JENNER accortling to the Califetniia Highway Petrol collision report was. known as BRUCE WILLIAM JENNER, but has since legally changed her name to CAITLYN JENNER. ~ 16. Thesrue namiss and cépacities, whether individual, plirel, corporate, partnership, associate, ox otherwise, of DOES 1 fhrough 25; inclusive, ate unknown to Plaintiffs wito t therefore sues said Defexidants by-suth fivtitions names. The fall extent of the facts linking. such ficitiously sued Defendants is uninown fo Plaintiffs. Plaintifs arc informed and believe, and thereon allege, that each of the Defendants designated herein as a DOE was, aul is, negligent, ofin sane other détiowable manber, tesponsible forthe events and happenings hereinafter referred to, and thereby negligently, of i'Some other actionable manner, legally and proximately caused the hereinafter described injuries and damages te Plaintiffs. Plaintitts will ‘hereafter seek leave of the Court to amend this Complaint to show the Defendants’ true names and capacities after the same have been ascertained. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION (NECLIGENCE — by all PLAINTINES against Defendants JENNER and ‘DOES 1 through 28, Inclusive) Ie Plaintifisre-olloge and incorporate herein by reference each and every allegation and statement contained in the prior paragraphs. 12. Plaintifis are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that at all times mentioned herein, Defendants CAITLYN JENNER and BOES 1 through 25, inclusive, owed a duty ofeare 4 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP ‘ente Morice toler il 700| er Anas, Catora0028 SOATT TED eRone. GIO? fe ae ow 27 28 |to all seasonably fareseeable‘people, including Plaintiffs to own, lease, manege, maintain, contro, entrust, ad opéiste DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE in a reasonable mahnet. Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon aflege, that at-all times mentioned herein, 13. Defendants CAITLYN JENNER end DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, carelessly, negligenty, andreckiessly owned, leased, managed, maintained, controlled, entrusted, required the transportation of, end operated DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE. Plaintiffs are informed and believe and based thereon allege that such conduct. included, but is not limited to, requiring the transportation of DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE and déiving at an unsafe speed for road conditions and rear ending HOWE'S LEXUS pushing it inte oncoming trafic and into-« head on collision [with PLAINTIFFS VEHICLE, thereby causing Plaintiffs to sustain severe and permanent injuri 14. Plaintifis informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that the negligent, grossly negligent, retikless, and unlawful comdtict of Defendants CAITLYN JENNER aad DOES 1 through 106, inelusive, in regards to the ownership, lease, management, maintenancé, coitrol, entrustinent aid éperation of DEFENDANT'S VEHICLE was the direst, legel atid proximate: cause of the injuties and damages to Plaintiffs as herein alleged. 15. Plaintiff is thformed and believes and thereupos alleges that Defendants CAITLYN JENNER snd DOES 1 throagh 100, inclusive, and each of them, were subject to laws and safety regulations pertaining to vehicle safety and maintenance, and ther such laws and safety regulations were intended to preserve life and prevent or minimize the risk of bodily injury to pessoas traveling on:public California roadways by ensuring the proper safe driving while traveling on those public California roadways. Specifically, Defendant CAITLYN JENNER and DOES 1 through 25, inclusive, caused the SUBJECT INCIDENT by operating DBFENDANT'S VEHICLE. in violation of California Vehicle Code §22305. 16. Plaintiffs are infotmed and believe and thereupon allege that they are/were a | member of a class (persons traveling on public California roadways) for whose benefit those laws land soiety regulations wore passéd.and designed to protect 17. Plaintiffs are informed and belicve and thereupon allege that the violation of ‘California Vehicle Code §22305 by Defendants CAITLYN JENNER atid DOES 1 through 100, 3 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES itehisive, and cach of thom, wap the proximate and actucl cause of Plaintiff! damages a8. outlined below. 18, Asa legal, diet and proximate result of the aforementioned conduct of Defendants CALTLYN JENNER. and DOES 1 duough 100, inclusive, and cach of them, Plaintifts ‘|| PETER WOLF-MILLESI, LEA WOLF-MILLESI, ELGA MAURER, NINO MILLESI and. 6 || GAETANO WOLF-MLLESI were injured and burt in their Health, strength and activity, 7 | sustaining serious injuries to their bodies, and shock and injury to their nervous systems and a 9 A us persons, ll of which said injuries have caused and continue to cause cach Plaintiff great physical ‘and mental pain and suffefing. Pleintifis are further informer and believe, and thereon allege, that 10] said injuries will xesult in some or all permanent disability io each of them, all to their general 11 | daniage in.an amount which will be-stated according proof pursuant to California Code of Civil Elf opmmeenesie gus B 19. By way of example, Elga Mayrer has suifored a sovere cervical fincture as a fesult 3 re 14] of the severe fiontal impact which has permanciitly debilitated lier. Peter Wolf-Millesi has aul 15 | suffered severe nerve damage to his wrists and hands fiom gripping the steoring whee! in this ¥ ue 16|| tremendous force impact causing him to be disabled from work. Lea Woll-Millest has sufeved ze 5 17]| significant blunt foree trauma s the fiont passenger occupant requiring emergency and ongoing 18] orthopedic treatment. The month old newborn baby in the vehicle Gaetano was not responding att 19} fhe scene and Bad to be transported to UCLA. emergency by ambulance for treatment. The 20 || emotional effects of being involved in-a collision that has taken the life of another has caused 21] wemendons distress and snffeting forthe Wolf-Millesifamiy. 2 20. Asa legal, direct an proximate result.of the aforementioned conduct of 23 || Defesdants CATTLYN IENNER and DOES I through 100, inclusive, and each of them, Plaintiffs ha 24 || wore prevented ftom attending their usual or potential occupation and/or Plaintiffs ate informed. i 25|| and believe, and thereon allege, that each of them may be-prevonted fromvattonding their 26]| occupations in the fisture, and thereby each will aso sustain a loss of earning capacity and loss of 22 | opportunity, in addition to lost earnings, past, present and future according to proof, pursuant to 28|| California Code of Civil Procedure Section 425.10, a 6 ii ‘CORBLAINT FOR DARAGES ries, Colonio70cas ‘BOAPTIPED poe. + SIOA7D 60 fox Sento erica Routers lt 0 PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LLP oom a oau 21, Asa legal, diteet and proximate result of the aforementioned conduct of the Defendants CAITLYN JENNER and'DOES | through, 100, inclusive, and cach of them, Pleintisis ‘were each compelled o and did employ the services of hospitals, physicians, surgoons, nurses and the like, to care for and threat each of fem, and did ficur hospital, ntedical, professional and incidental expenses, ard Plaintiffs are informed and believe, and thereon allege, that by reason of ‘each of their injuries, will necessdrily incur additional like éxpetises for an indefinite period of time in the future, the exact amount of which expenses Will be stated according to proof, pursuant to California of Civil Procedure Section 425.10. 22, Asa direct and proximate result of the aforementioned. conduct of Defendants, and each of them, Blaintifis have sustaited property damage in ah amount not yet ascertained, and thor economic. damage as.a result of the property damage. SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION (NEGLIGENT INELICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS: by all Plaintiffs as Against Defendants CAITLYN JENNER and DOES 1 through 25, Inclusive) 23. Plaintiffs re-allege and incorporate herein by reference each and every allegation an statement contained in the prior paragraphs. 24, At the time of the SUBJECT INCIDENT, Plaintiffs PETER WOLF-MILLESI, LEA WOLF-MILLESI, ELGA MAURER, NINO MILLESLand GAETANO WOLF-MLLESI weie contemporaneousty aware of the injury-producing event and the injuries suffered by one another in the SUBJECT INCIDENT caused by Defeidant CAITLYN JENNER. 25. Plaintiffs were within the zone of danger anct were in fact direct victims of the impact dering the SUBJECT INCIDENT. 26. _Asaesilt of observing the injuries to each other, all closely related as parents, children, spouses and grandparents, Plaintiffs suffered and confitiue to-suffer Severs exiotional distress damages beyond that which would be expected in.a disinterested witness, PRAYER FOR RELIEF WHEREFORE, Plaintiffs PETER WOLE-MILLES!, LEA WOLF-MILLESI, ELGA | MAURER, NINO MILLESI and GAETANO WOLE-MLLESI pray judgment against Defendants 7 ‘COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES Ler ates Coit 0128 1941 Sente Moho outer Sule 700 SMOAQ7 1D gohe = OAT? 16 tox PANISH SHiBA & BOYLS LLP oe Aw ew. | CAITLYN JENNER and DOES | dhrougly25, inclusive, and each of them, a8 follows: 1. For general damages (also kniowh at noi-tconornie dathages), indluding bet not limited fo, past and fulu pain and suffesing and disfigurement, in an amount in excess of the jurisdictional minimum, according to proof 2. For special damages (also known as economic. damages), including but-not limited Jo past.and future hospital, médical, professional, and: incidental expenses as well as past bd future loss of earnings, loss of opportunity, and loss of eaming capscity, in excess of the jurisdictional minima, sécording to proof. tiffs property and economic damage related thereto, 3. Far damages for Pa according post; 4, Forhospital, medical, professional and incidental expenses, according to ptook: 5. Fordamagés foi Plaintif’s other eestiomic lostes, according 16 proof, & For projudgment interest, according to: proof 7. Por costs of suit inourred heicit, acting ts proof} 8 Forstich other and further reliefs the: Court may deem justand proper. DATED: December, 2015 PANISH SHEA & BOYLE.LLP ese Speneer R. Licas Attomeys for Plaintifis g “COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES ‘saarrarspnone © 30 ‘PANISH SHEA & BOYLE LL? woe be oe owe a DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL, Plaintiffs PETER WOLP-MICLES), LEA. WOLF-MILLESI, ELGA MAURER, [NINO MILLES ani GAETANO: WOLF-MLCEST hereby demand a trial by jury-as to all calists of action, DATED: December 4,2015 ANISH SHEA & BOYLELLP Bi ‘COMPLATET FORDAMAGES rage 10 of 15) CNIGINAL © ERT TROT AORTA SR TESTER {Spencer R. Lucas, (SBN 232498) PANISH SHER « BOWS, Lue pS oe Monica Blvd. FILED Suite 70 Los Angeles, Ca 90025 DOM Oru sauramevts” 310-897 recso: 320-477-1699 ae pus 2 "SUPERIOR COURT CF CALIFORNIA, COUNTY OFLOS' Angeles: bE O4 enames Vit orth Ania gexec weap anesen 111 Hoxth, Hild Sereet ia ares Nuwiptestos aneetes a yowe Cent Y2 my ‘CASENAME: ©Wolf-Millesi v. Jenner GViL CASE COVER SHEET Complex Case Designation wea 03-365 teTuntmies PStimtea CP Counter To doinder nc ve | Flatwitrctapeerance pyaetendan [ance xsouss §25,000)_ $25,000." less (Gal. Ries of Cour, rule 3402) oon ems 1-6 bolow must bo completed (see instucons on page 2). f- Check one Boxbelow forthe case typ that best deserbes tis. case: ‘Alo Tort ‘Conte Provsionaty Gomplox Ct Litigation (Ja 2 Lorene otcontantvanany 06) (Cal Rules of Cour rte 3400-3408) ainsared moto (8) ruts 3740 coteetanst00) ats tageroguiton 03) ‘ther PUPDAN (erzoral urPeeperty F constracion dtocit0) Damagentongtu Death Tort Toms txtcen A Dtests (09 (secures gston 25 wl perecuct aby 29) {= ) Eowitenmontavtoxic tor (20) Dieses mapracie 4s) Cerinent donates Insurneo exverage aa tig tem ne Ged one Purp a) ‘condemnation (14) ‘above sted provisionally complex case ‘Non-PUPDAKD (Other Tert Jweengft eviction 3) ‘woes 41) (Aasiness torvunar business practi (or) [—] Otter reel property (26) Enforcement of Judgment Tewarions a Uniawfut Detatper (| Enforcement of udgment (20) (Elostematon ii) Toner 31) tMgeetanocus Cv Complaint on) pester 2) CE ircoen CD Aetect oper 9) longs s+ J onerconpsin ot species abo) 2) (Jrretetstns negtgerca 25) itt Revie iscatneous Culeftion Cotternen purcin tet 38) dace tere (05) (= Parincstp and cxportegovermence (21) Employment EPetton re: activation nerd (11) [] Ornepetton (ot specifod above) (43) Corgi srnnaton 05 iwirot manna 2) other emptoymant (16) Jotratucicst review (99), This cese [J is [2c] isnot complex under ule 3.400 ofthe Califor Rules of Cou. Ifthe case is complex, mark the {actors requitng exceptional usta management: a Large number of winessos a (} Large nuimbarof sopartely represented parties 1b, (7 Extensive mation practice raising elffcul or novel Coordination wih rlatadacions pendinginone or more cours In thor ecu, states, or counties or ina federal court ‘ssuos hat lb ene-consurng to resolve CO Sibslanialamcuntof documentary evienee [| Suetanta postidgment ude supervision monetary b. LJ nonmontany: declaratory cr injunctve relic. puntive 8, Remedies sought (check althat app): a. 4. Number ofeauses of action fepecit): Two (2) 5, Thiscase [J is [ic] isnot s class‘action suit ‘8! there are any known related cases, fle and serve a notice of related caso. (You may uso. 8) Bite: 12/4/15 Spencer Rca gata toe) ——— eeunEcr Aten NOTICE Plaintit rust fa this caver sheet with tho st papor fod in the action or praceeding (except small claims cases or cases fled undrtn rtate Cede, Famly Cate cr Were an lststons Code. (Cal Rules of our e223) Fabre 0 ema resi J. sanctions. + Fists cover shen ado ory cover shoot roe by al cot ue ba na Sateen rule 3.400 a of te Calfemia Rules of Cou, you must oprve a copy ofthis cover heel on all nei errs cae unre 3740 ora complex case, hs cover chee ib used rsa puroaes on Ht ‘CIVIL CASE a SHEET, [agl = Saree eS eee vine sar oot 2 Faget 20 Doo ED = 1635966280 - oe Type = orm (rage 21 of 25) ~. e e INSTRUGTIONS ON HOW TO COMPLETE THE COVER SHEET CM-010 To Plaintiffs and Others Filing First Papers. ‘if you are filing a first paper (for example, a complaint) in a civil case, you must Teta ent ar ang Fi rae, ht a Sen ose tae, he oman piel Seale aan ee a ee toe ind You man capa tne roe en ea ont elem yor mol eck SE ee te es etenen il araee teoke woeheas ed ion & check the more specific one. if the case has mulliple causes of action, check the box.that best indicates. he primary cause of action. Fae ee en ru ats ates Seto cos oe hr we SNE. ASE _sheet must be filed only with your initial paper. Fallire to tile a cover sheet with the first paper fled in a civil. case may subject a party, its Naar om Cab ne ee osoaton coma Roe cae Seren Pee tan Coston Cues sates ecards Ae defrod ss an ain ey ont cued Fo eens a aati Ss at nto om ssopoee seg ton a toyacle eh oe ee ea ee dies be eh damages, (2) punitive damages, (3) tecovety of real property, (4) recovery of personal property, or (5) a prejudgment wit of attachment. ‘The identification of'a case as a rule 3.740 collections cass on this form means that it will be exempt from thie general time-forservice ‘requirements and cage management rules, unless a defendant files a responsive pleading. A rue 3.740 collactons case will be subject be eaunepiniepi entero Saute Commie Cavs conos case pres mus aso ue the Ch ose Covr Stel esate wht he eee rae igre t's cot eter ast afb Clee Race o Son sme be ees ‘eampiating the appoy ‘complainton all paes to te action. A detendant may ‘bores in tems { and 2 ia plantif deignales @ case 2s complex, tho caver shoot must be served withthe ‘fle and serve no later than the time of Xs frst appearance a joinder in the Plains designation, a couror-designation that te Gas i hat complex, er, ihe paint has made no designation, a designation that ‘the cases complex. case TYPES AND EXANPLES oto copa xray Compo i Ligation et ‘ao G21 PeseaisyPe ch fate (5) Fes Gon ate 3400-23) orapektent bona resco Roniahasee ee nese converts “en ana ator Aetna ate om ‘roortcein eget conyoetharany Sraeh—Selue ‘Gis iotng ets ee Tétetin eck ea ed oregon Extomenarese Ter 2) ._Renedet ah niger ccome tues Coase cua Piety Conant beat) oye conigaMarany ‘eran ton posal Pep cole ey mn Seipiaeemh “Asbestos (04) Cotaeton Case-—Soler Plant eee anion ‘Asbeslos Property Dar ‘Other Protseary Nolercat Enforment of svdgment (20) ferret haces “Sa creer one sane Cg npn Pred ely el ator soe _ cs of Sagat om ‘Cosson eee han rectors) ven ass) Scots soe Selegme ideo onercost ‘hate Any Av Physicians & Surgeons ‘Contacte! Fad {not anpaié txes) one Chrome bene resets tery ot ‘pec Ral Pray “tapeeton i Ted cer Pipa eet oars oni Beret dant Perea ty 08:0 Centon "ose stay ‘won tron aceansogs hl Compa, in oye SrarRunapty te gana 20) neon. (oa, ssau vane) Vet ot Posen ofa te Cri fete a uate raat Rj oy ‘Negligent infiction of | Qiipe Reet ropa ct ‘Injunctive Retief Only (non- ‘Emotional Distress bd - eat thor PYPONND ‘Unlawful Detainer “7 = nonpon (one Te ‘armel Oe Gomer Comat ‘inhess Towne Bess a onan geeothonconsen Pace) Dupe 8 fy cso mes te! oe an gy cen ‘Zin tect on fot, apo eterna ; tticetansous ea peton Bemclee neieamcomrentarteceiny SP dee Idotamatn (eg, andere “Asset Fortine 0 evenercat sD) Potton he: Aton Aart) ‘tes ation at spaced Froud (16) ‘Wott Mandate (02) eel “Ahtetiectuat Property (19) “Writ-Administrative Mandamus: ‘Workplace Violence [Bots eater 2) Vit socam on ite Gut : Legal Malpracice ‘Cave iat ee “Or sl iraie vw Oe tea coat ae etn “eer at) er even 9 Seti tr Nao cange Epgleynont Rev ein en Ore Potten or Rete nL iF eras ved ier ‘herrea ‘anos ter Caen eens. ‘CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET Pagoda ooh 1 Pagel 21 ~ Deg ID = 1635965280 - hoe Type = rage 12 of 15) =~ "© ORIGINAL WOITE WelEMaTiess vs dennek CIVIL CASE GOVER SHEET ADDENDUM AND cr STATEMENT OF LOGATION (CERTIFICATE OF GROUNDS:FOR ASSIGNNIENT TO.COURTHOUSE LOCATION) This torn le required plreuant to Loaal le 20) altnow cull chséfllngs'inihe Log Angeles Supetiof Gout, tem |, Check theetypes of fieeitig and fil in the estimated. length of Ridabinig expected for this case: uRY TRIAL? [3E) Yes CLASS ActION? =] yes \wurreD case? (_] Yes Tine estmareD FoR TRIALL4 [—LHoURS/ ¥tpavs: envi Indicate the-goract digit and couithduse location (4-sleps ~Ityou checkei*Limited Case’, skip totem tN, Pa): Stop 1 atiertist conpleiiig he CivliCase Cover Sheet form, fd the main Civil Gase Gover Sheet heading for your ‘sage,in theielt margin below and, tothe rightin Colum A, the Civil Case: Cover Sheet case type youl selected, ‘Step 2: Check one Superior Courttype of:dctirt in Column Etbelow which best desciibes the natute of this cage. Step 3: n’Goumn, cittle théstéason forthe cout location choice that applies tothe type of action you have checked. For any:exception to thie éourt location, ses’ Local Rle:2:0. | ‘Applicable Reasoris far Ghiogsiig Courthouse Legation (see ColumtC below) (gs) ss peti ne Sreton Canc ' afegty an a en & CEENSSES lens aha ele, 15 Bistttrtabs Conmunomr oles Stop. Fiintne inermatn equebiea of page 4tn em complete lem. Signe decaratin, | E abe | i ‘aewed nies oy _ | CLariv0 pecan isopod DarogettonlalDeath-UnhasiNnoiet [12,4 (1 asir0 Asbestos Property Damage i‘ Re pa ‘Rétesioe(O4, | j.arezt asbesos-Pesenal irate 2 t B | prtucrusnnpceny | Dares Producing tastes remewvepimanay, [12a Badu rs i CL.araio acer itsiractics- Pnyseians Sixginit ta ye 3 TE arasd citer Protesslanal Heath Cerematpiactice fae ~g : Die a) aveso ear Lay te, daar, tad. ge I peel, | arzso ‘egaeea BoaPromtrty camapetnce Dette, 4a we seek |) rR ‘enone oii et ntetsibes 1 ¥ 2) araeo' omer esisona rjuyiPtopany Oamagentranatl Daath 44, Ww 2 inet CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Tocat ue 20 AND-STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page.1 of¢ sn Deol 1 Pageh 12 - Doa ID = 1635966280 ~ Doo Type = OTHER (rage 12 08 35) neoze Site: Corrareaveustioss Tor etttaderenct efeemaet) | 1.3 z a aa = EE ‘Defamation (135 {J A864, Detamalion (tandertbe) AB ae Frau te) yasor9 rise eeriecy 42,8 si 7 as017 Lepatntatoactin Aa a Petsson NeRRHe | T=) acoso cher Pineetineriabrtiee (ra. agien ees uz, onary ‘1 nena ero ersonl inPropeny Oamage tt 2. I T ronatrtessinatonj96) | (A600 wrongtt Teminaton 12d g FE) As024-cnerepiementGemelaaeaze: + Wed EB [_Secertormen 8) | Fc ator cones areas +0 TJ Adank eta Contarino ower] 2.5 ntl Behold AW | pce Criaenerann sith ier tawthosieneny |E 05 Gotineretesd | C)-Asntd Realasnebinach oecuseeleranytopTioyd) i CT enna oar prscnorconnaawairanyteatenaeraarsiney | 5 Eso ‘conectins case:Setne Pint 286 Attia ober PromissatyHoterCatettions Case 4,5: cts (0, ‘esattset ‘ravncnComageiay | L—) AB tases Cacnage Gt sompen Laas pee comme ras | ae oer soriact (sy |] Abas! Torfowsnrence EOE HE] asoat ctv contact bupuctrtbeschnsarcattausegioence). | 1,2.5,8, [“Engeaoorentnere | aAITuREaauons > SERRE [Kime ceonsiccnnin tematmes [a i oe 28. r Asti Wergace Force 2,8 2 | cxernenropry 65 asose auier tas 2.8, 1] soso pine noaepaytuteninnisenanndtstenaniorconye) 2.5 [Doman conmes] [| ant tnnodanerimemncal tian eatuind [2,8 We 7 uae tt 2 [Brie aan na oper maborneni pean aeumRAONEIRD |B 3 Trina oe 5 2.4 y i _ | ASIF novi Ftrectoue 2 © 5 | castboninsonge 8) | 1 Aste nein 28 Ww OV eRe OND CIVIL GASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM —~Tecarrezo HSC Remon o08 AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Fage2of4 Oi ‘ooh 1 Pages 25 ~ Bea ID = 2635966280 ~ Doa type = OMER rage 16 of 15) iixtigg Seva Feniunicase Jusieal Review asinrenouTes) | 2,6. Polnreabetan(t+ | [AE Aah, Paton Cpe ARHATA, 2b, (J. wit atensaie tmndénas 2.0, -wotopaststo cy | (Laetse: writs Mondentas or Linited Cua Gase'aliet 2 ABL5% Wik: Oth: Larios Gobi Cae Review 2 te ee 28 [actervsrTiace Regulavan (09) (9009 Antirisvtmide Retin Cenucontetor | CTasone Chatve be Semin | ae cameo ‘secuiten Lignton(2ey |] Aspe Swaine Lonon Coke een (aio toe Toenctormenil Proviionsly:Complex Litgtion TwasoreeGeeraee ia | }Aastte neuonsaGnmeneSioghiotSinPnemé cn ast Site Stale ugar. 4 hasten Abotractonavdgment i E | eggesnay | CL ator coats per. pe seston 2 2 ‘et Sadrhent (20). (as rid AdminttatverAgeny ae Grok uti Tame) (aa Prueceeeae treat of ier trode tax [llastte othe: engrcementoF Judgment ase, ‘RICO 1 Hiss faseicnrig U0) Cove $28 el Ele Soest haa 4 ‘otorcempiinta, | [LPADed iuntie Rat Onyx domestsharassmnen, ae i oESpaciiag ARovR) 42) | TT AB6ii Cher Commesciat Compleat ase (n08totnonecomples). a 7 1] Asis otter ist Complaint (ror forinon complex) te 2 Fasoontp Epon i noesesie i Pema | Kai tevin eee tomnenes eth i Tastes Git hiseeion 12,9. ae . les wiotece Harassment IF 8 pratranay, | Lalit tennant ttn 2 a ‘Wot Speciied Abotey: | [) asian Eiecniconae 2 be hal 1 Aétto betontorchangeot name 2 R ‘TE nats Pontontorneiettom tis cin ie 2BA.8 » 2 Ast00-o1nor ivi Peton 2.8. We 7 3 aaa a ne THOW 60 Res OY CIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Toeal Rilo LASR APrTovEA OS: AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION. Page 3 of 1 ‘oot 1 Fagew 14 - Doo TD = 1635966260 ~ Doc type = OER rage 15 of 35) ‘wore WolEWliesi y. Jenner SEE {aa Sinn cf pation: tne eons! he poco pry residencecr ar of busine peromancn gether circumstance indicated in Wem IL, Step'3 on Page 1, a§ the proper reason for fling inthe cout locaton you selecied, reason, anh apron noma eum wouee pacific Coast Huy/South of Corral side Goiwnn forthebpectacienthetyortmeseieceater | Canyon Re 1.02 mms. O67. Cason. Malibu ica, em IW, Declaatfon of Asslonrient| Becald-snder penalty of erp under the tawsof the Stale of Galorinhat he foregoing is te ‘end corectand thatthe above- cfd iat ‘gnmenttothe Central ‘cquthouge inthe Tos_Angeles Disc ofthe Super ala, Couny of Los Angeles [Code Gi. Proc, § 382 # sea, and Local Rule20, subds. 2). {6) and (A). Seer ob SaUTREOFATTORNENRLRE RT] : Spentét R. Tueas, Esq. PLEASE HAVE THE FOLL( ITEMS | AND READY TO BE.FILED IN ORDER TO PROPERLY ‘Covanence YOUR NEW GUN Case: T=? i a 41. Original Complaint or Petifon 2. fing a Complain, a'completed Sumnmons-form for issuance by the Crk, 3. Givi Cass Cover Sheet, Judicial Council form CM-010. 4 Gu case ars Sheet Adendum and Stent of Location in, LACY 19 LASE Aproved 34 Rev Payment in ful of he fling fee, unless fees‘have been waved. 8. Asigned order appointing the Guardian ad Liter, Judicial Cour form CIV-010, f the plaintiffor pebioneris a ‘minor under 18 yearsof age wil be required by Court in orderto issue-a summons. 7. Additional:copias of doouriénts 1:be conformed by te Clerk. Coples of tie cbver Sheet hid tis addendum ‘ust Ke-served along with the summons and complaint or other initiating pleading in the case. Teta dH GIVIL CASE COVER SHEET ADDENDUM Tosa Rulez ! erate AND STATEMENT OF LOCATION Page sot 4 : aaa erence ‘Deol 1 Fagot 25 ~ Doo 1D = 1635966260 - Doo type = OnE

You might also like