Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ARHEOLOKI INSTITUT
BEOGRAD
MONOGRAPHIES 36
ParisBeograd
2012
ii :
ISBN978-2-916716-31-2978-86-80093-78-9
ISSN0751-0594
Composition et infographie
Artyom Ter-Markosyan-Vardanyan
Suivi de la publication
Emmanuelle Capet
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Vujadin Ivanievi and Michel Kazanski eds, The Pontic-Danubian Realm in the Period of the Great
Migration (Centre de recherche dHistoire et Civilisation de Byzance, Monographies36/Arheoloki
institut, Posebna izdanja, Knjiga 51), Paris-Beograd 2012.
244
DIETER QUAST
In 1918, a rich grave was discovered on the southern or southwestern slope of Mount
Mithridates. Through Messaksoudis private collection and, later, the Louvre, its contents
reached the Muse des Antiquits Nationales in Saint-Germain-en-Laye. Described
as a stone chamber under a barrow (LOr des princes barbares2000, 98-101 Cat.No.5;
Beck, Kazanski, Vallet 1988; Rostovtzeff 1923), it contained a gold diadem with the
impression of a coin of Commodus (180-192), a belt buckle, a sword with a mounting
suspension of jade, a few gold sheets in the form of strap ends and some round sheets
with impressions of coins (Pupienus, 238), as well as an inkpot (Fig.1). The form of
the gold brooch is typical for Crimea, Ukraine and northern Caucasus (Almgren1923,
74ff, fig.157; Ambroz 1966, 32f, pl.9, 18; pl.16; pl.22,2: group15, series3), but this is an
245
246
DIETER QUAST
old type in this context. What determines the dating of the tomb in the last quarter of
the 4thcentury is the horse harness. The inkpot (atramentarium), decorated with enamel
(Fig.2) was produced in the 3rdcentury, most probably in the Rhineland (Knzl1995,46;
LOr des princes barbares 2000, Cat.No.15; Teegen 1999, 217f.)3. It may have served not
as a writing utensil, but rather as a beautiful old prestigious object.
Fig.2: Distribution map of ink pots with enamel (after: Jones 1993, 164, with additions).
Graphic: Michael Ober, RGZM.
3. The list of enamelled ink pots by C. Jones (1993, 164) can be completed with Dvener 1995, 103104 (Dehlingen-Gurtelbach, dp. Bas-Rhin, F).
247
A splendid burial built of large flagstones and spolia was discovered in Tarane (Ivanov
ski1984; 1987; Kaufmann-Heinimann2003, 129f, with figs. 121-122). Richly furnished, it
contained, among other objects, a large silver dish, a silver jug, a diatret glass (CermanoviKuzmanovi1995), a set of gaming pieces (calculli), a silver spur, an axe and a pencil
case with a silver stylos and an eraser (Fig.3-4). The gold crossbow broochtype 3c after
Keller (1971, 26-55) or type 3/4 after Prttel (1988; cf.Soupault 2003, 53-58)suggests a
date between 330 and 420, but the excavator Milan Ivanovski prefers an earlier date based
on the silver dish, which he attributes to the reign of Licinius (308-324) in accordance
with parallels from Ni. The axe found in the grave could have served as a weapon, though
rather unusually for the Roman army, or could also have been a tool.
248
DIETER QUAST
Fig.4: Tarane (near Debar, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia), Sample of objects.
1. Crossbow brooch; 2. Diatret glass; 3. Spur; 4. Silver plate.
(after: Ivanovski 1987, 85, 87-88, figs. 3-5).
249
In 1993, three late Roman graves built of large flagstones were excavated in BudapestIII,
jlak, Bcsi t 42 (Fig.5) (Nagy 2005). Grave 2 contained two glass beakers, an old
and used silver crossbow brooch (Keller type 1/2), a silver belt with balteus buckles and
fittings, a follis of Galerius Maximianus minted in Heraclea in 309-310, and a long sword
4
5
7. Strap end. 8. Ink pot. 9. Sword (after: Nagy 2005, 420, 429-430, 434, figs. 11, 18-20).
250
DIETER QUAST
of an eastern steppe nomadic type with niello decoration suggesting its production inside
the Roman Empire (Fig.5: 9). In addition to the parallels mentioned by Margit Nagy,
the long and small blade fits are known in the context of equestrian weapons, e.g. from
Brut in the Caucasus and Tugozvonovo in the Altai (Grabschtze vom Kaukasus1991, 61,
Cat.No.277; Gabuev2005, 34, Cat.No.55; Umanskij1978, 134, fig.5; 138, fig.9). The bronze
inkpot (Fig.5: 8) of a fairly simple form has analogies in the region (Bilkei1980, pl.3-4).
Nagy (2005, 476) dated the burial ca. 400, especially because of the belt fittings.
4. Zalaszentgrt (North of Lake Balaton, Hungary)
In 1970, a grave made of tiles was discovered in Zalaszentgrt. It was destroyed and
robbed, but a few objects remained in the burial (Mller1976). Next to the coins of
Crispus and Constantinus (the most recent was minted in 322 in Rome), there was a bronze
crossbow brooch (Kellertype 3c), a sword and a bronze ink pot with inlays of silver and
copper (Fig.6). The ornament of this atramentarium makes it a unique piece (Bilkei, 1980,
70f, esp. 74, thought that the ink pot could be much older than the burial). Rbert Mller
(1976, 67, cf.Tejral 1999, 232) dated the grave to the late 4thearly 5thcentury.
2c
2a
4b
2d
2b
4a
3
1
0
50
5a
5b
50
251
To sum up, this short list includes only four graves containing weapons and writing
utensils (Fig.7). Since most writing utensils were made of organic materials (papyrus
charta, parchment membrana, wooden panel covered with wax tabula cerata, pen calamus),
they are obviously missing from the archaeological record (Boi, Feugre2004, 21-41).
But inkpots, when they belong to grave furniture, are detectable without any doubt.
Weapon
Writing
Utensils
Brooch
Type
Almgren
157
Ambroz
gr. 15,
ser. 3
Other Grave
Goods
Burial
Form
Dating
Gold
Horse harness
Belt Buckle
Gold Sheet
Appliques
Tumulus
with
Stone
Chamber
Late 4th
Century
Flagstone
Grave
First
Half 4th
Century
Material
Sword
Ink pot
Axe
Pencil
Case,
stylos
Keller
3C
Gold
Diatret Glass
Silver Plate
Silver Jug
Spur
Calculi
Budapest
Sword
Ink pot
Keller
1B-2A
Silver
Belt(s)
Glasses
Flagstone
Grave
Turn
4th / 5th
Century
Zalaszentgrt
Sword
Ink pot
Keller
3C
Bronze
Destroyed
and robbed
Tile
Grave
Late 4th /
early 5th
Century
Ker
Tarane
Fig.7: Graves with weapons and writing utensils discussed in the article.
The only grave on the list from outside the Empire, the one from Kerch, contained
an old inkpot, possibly no longer in use. Inside the Roman Empire, a distribution map
of all weapon graves of the 4thcentury shows a clear difference between Pannonia and
the Balkan Peninsula. The small number of graves with weapons on the Balkans makes it
impossible to establish any patterns, but the grave from Tarne with the axe finds parallels
in the burials from Putievo, Rohatica (both BiH), Kull and Zgrdhesh (both AL) (List
no.18-19 and 25-26).
By way of contrast, weapon graves are more numerous in Pannonia, and most of
those buried have their cloak closed with a crossbow brooch, which identifies them as
members of the (military) administration (Bilkei1980, 75; Schmauder 2002, 76ff;
Kaufmann-Heinimann2003, 129f; cf. contra Deppert-Lippitz2000, 52). I.Bilkei
(1980, 75) linked the culture of writing in Pannonia with the military: 10 out of 15 late
Roman graves with ink pots in this region contain a crossbow brooch. Men with a military
cloak (sagum) and writing utensils are depicted on tombstones (Eckhart 1976, pl.16,
no. 51 and 53). The late Roman army employed at all levels of command a substantial
bureaucratic apparatus (Le Bohec 2006, 91f.), but the combination of sword and stilus
252
DIETER QUAST
was more common in daily life than in graves. At least 15 late Roman graves from well
studied Pannonia produced ink pots, but only two also contained weapons, even though
weapon graves from the 4th early 5thcentury are not so rare (Keller 1971, 77f.; Mrton
2002, 139f with fig. 234; cf. Fig.8). Axes appear in graves only until the first half of the
4thcentury, but it is not clear if they were all used as weapons. Alice Sz. Burger (1984, 81)
identified the man buried in BudapestII, Pasart, Grave A as a member of a curia because
of the sella curialis and interpreted the axe as part of the fasces. Among the graves with
spearheads, many include hunting weapons, like the boar spear from Dombvr;5 the
same may be true for the graves containing arrowheads (Sgi1981, 99f.). Swords are not
Fig.8: Distribution map of weapon graves inside the Roman Empire (Barbaricum is not mapped).
Sword. Spearhead. Axe. Graphic Vera Kasshlke, RGZM.
4. Some of the graves on this distribution map of weapon graves from 4thcentury Pannonia should
253
4th early 5th-century Weapon Graves from Pannonia and the Balkans
(the list does not include graves with arrowheads and daggers)
1. BudapestIII, jlak, Bcsi t 42, Grave 2: cf. Fig.5.
10.
254
18.Putievo
DIETER QUAST
22.
Svilengard (BG), mapped by M. Schulze-Drrlamm (1985, 565, list 3, no. 56), is not listed
because it is dated to the 2ndcentury AD (Velkov 1937, 117-170, esp. 170).
as rare as one may imagine; they become slightly more common in the second third of the
5thcentury (not shown on fig.8) (Kiss1981, 147f.). One could also mention the NoricoPannonian tumuli with weapons from 1st and 2ndcentury Pannonia (Palgyi1989;
Palgyi, Nagy2002, 86-91; Mrv2006), but there is a clear chronological gap between
them and the 4thcentury weapon graves.
The comparison with the West is instructive. In northwestern Gaul, weapon graves
of this period are more numerous and much debated (Keller1971, 77). Are they burials
of mercenaries of Germanic origin, as most notably argued by Horst Wolfgang Bhme
(2009), or just new forms of self display of the local population during times of crisis
(Halsall2009; Theuws2009)? While here is not the place to discuss the material from
Gaul, we should adhere to a clear distinction between West and East. Only one main
characteristic need be mentioned. In the West, most cemeteries have more than one
weapon grave, and the deceased are accompanied by females wearing a foreign costume.
As far as I know, none of the western weapon graves contains writing utensils.
255
While weapon graves with writing utensils in Pannonia and the Balkans are few, they
share salient features, which call for interpretation:
All other late Roman weapon graves in Pannonia and the Balkans share the same
characteristics. People who buried the deceased used crossbow brooches, ink pots
and weapons to demonstrate their status. The last item has long been interpreted as a
barbarian element. This is, indeed, the impression produced by the maps published 25
years ago by Mechthild Schulze-Drrlamm (1985, 550, fig. 33-34), showing sword graves
from Barbaricum, many of them, especially from the second half of the 4thcentury, being
inhumation graves.6 But if the sword graves from Pannonia and the Balkans were added
to the map, this burial custom would lose its barbarian conspicuousness and become one
of the provincial standards. Rather than be explained as barbarian and foreign, they
can be related to the late antique barbarised army personnel, who developed a specific
form of self-presentation not only in lifetime but also in burial (von Rummel 2007, 342353). Among the symbols of high social status found in the graves, weapons could appeal
to a barbarian and more generally military audience, possibly testifying to military rank,
while crossbow brooches and writing utensils would be more meaningful for provincial
Roman dignitaries. Ink pots, however, could also have been meaningful for people of a
barbarian background as a symbol of education, which was the main divider between
barbarian and Roman elites in Late Antiquity (Geary 1996, 40f.). An inscription from
Budapest underlines the mentality of these foederati: Francus ego, cives Romanus, miles
in armis / egregia virtute tuli bello mea dextera sem[p]er (CIL III/1 1873, 453, no.3576;
Desjardins, Rmer1873, 84, no.175, with pl.30). On the underside of the 2.38m long
inscription, this Francus is portrayed in a typically provincial Roman manner with a
crossbow brooch and a sagum (Fig.9) (Nagy 2007, 174).
In the eastern part of the Roman Empire, weapon graves were always an exception.
The most probable explanation is that existing regulations or laws did not authorise such
burial practice. The fact that weapons belonged to the state rather than to private soldiers
could be a contributing factor (Schnberg1953). Other regulations applied in regions
controlled by barbarians, especially from the second half of the 5thcentury; therefore,
weapon graves are much more numerous, e.g., in Lombard or Avar Pannonia and in parts
of the former Western Empire. While the elites in these regions were acquainted with
writing (Moreau2008, 242-243; Gillett2008a-b), they attributed no symbolic value
to writing utensils. The few writing utensils found in graves in the Merovingian Empire
6. The grave of Epl in Pannonia, noted in fig. 33, is younger in fact and belongs to the first half
of 5thcentury, cf. Bemmann 2006. Swords are missing in the ernjachov Sntana-de-Mure culture
on the lower Danube, which is connected with the Goths who did not furnish their male graves with
weapons (Bierbrauer 1975, 68f; 1994, 55, 108, 124, 137).
256
DIETER QUAST
are not associated with weapons. They seem to be usually (Quast1994, 618), but not
exclusively (von Petrikovits1967, 460-464; Aouni1992, 87-89) connected with clerics.
Fig.9: Budapest, tomb stone 2.38m long with inscription on the right side and a male figure on
the underside (after: Nagy 2007, 174).
257
Bibliography
AtanasovG. 2001: Das rmische Wagengrab von Silistra (Bulgarien), in: F.Daim,
Th.Khtreiber (Hrsg.), Sinn & Sein, Burg & Mensch, Exhibition catalogue,
St.Plten 2001, 130-136.
AlmgrenO. 1923: Studien ber nordeuropische Fibelformen, Leipzig 1923.
AmandM., NouwenR. 1989: Gallo-Romeinse tumuli in de Civitas Tungrorum, Tongeren
1989.
Ambroz1966: A.K., (
D 1-30), 1966.
AmbsR., FaberA. 1998: Ein Bestattungsplatz der provinzialen Oberschicht Raetiens
an der Donau
sdstrae bei Nersingen-Unterfahlheim, Berichte der RmischGermanischen Kommission 79, 1998, 383-478.
AouniH. 1992: Von der Sptantike in die Merowingerzeit ein Grberfeld in Jlich,
Archologie im Rheinland 1992, 87-89.
BarkcziL. 1960: Ksrmai temet Pilismarton, Folia Archaeologica 12, 1960, 111-132.
BeckF., KazanskiM., ValletF. 1988: La riche tombe de Kertch du Muse des Antiquits
Nationales, Antiquits nationales 20, 1988, 63-81.
BemmannJ. 2006: Eine vlkerwanderungszeitliche Bestattung aus Epl, Kom. Esztergom,
mit Schwertriemendurchzgen skandinavischer Forme, in: V.Mihailescu-Brliba,
C.Hriban, L.Munteanu (eds.), Miscellanea Romano-Barbarica in honorem septa
genarii magistri Ion Ioni oblata, Bucureti 2006, 217-246.
BierbrauerV. 1975: Die ostgotischen Grab- und Schatzfunde in Italien, Spoleto 1975.
BierbrauerV. 1994: Archologie und Geschichte der Goten vom 1.-7.Jahrhunderts,
Frhmittelalterliche Studien 28, 1994, 51-171.
BilkeiI. 1980: Rmische Schreibgerte aus Pannonien, Alba Regia 18, 1980, 61-90.
BhmeH.W. 2009: Migrants fortunes: the integration of Germanic peoples in Late
Antique Gaul, in: D.Quast (ed.), Foreigners in Early Medieval Europe: Thirteen
International Studies on Early Medieval Mobility, Mainz 2009, 131-147.
BoiD., FeugreM. 2004: Les instruments de lcriture, Gallia 61, 2004, 21-41.
BurgerA.Sz.1972: Rmaikori temet Majson [Ein rmerzeitliches Grberfeld in Majs],
Archaeologiai rtest 99, 1972, 64-100.
BurgerA.Sz.1974: Rmaikori temet Somodor-Pusztn (Komrom M.) [Ein rmer
zeitliches Grberfeld in Somodor-Puszta], Archaeologiai rtest 101, 1974, 64-101.
BurgerA.Sz.1984: Ksrmai Srok Aquincumban [Sptrmische Grber in Aquincum],
Budapest Rgisgei 25, 1984, 65-118.
258
DIETER QUAST
259
260
DIETER QUAST
261
262
DIETER QUAST
VasilevV.P., MitanovP.1974: 4. , ,
a 14/1, 1974, 27-43.
Welkov I. 1937: Razkopkit okolo Mezek grada Svilengrad prez 1932-1933 god, Izvestija
na Blgarskija Archeologieski Instituta 11, 1937, 117-170.
iviM.2007: Catalogue of small finds from excavations outside the Fortified Palace of
Romuliana (2005-2007), Starinar 57, 2007, 277-307.