Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ID: 100832
9-33
Materials inventory
WIP inventory (3,750 x $18)
Transfer to WIP inventory
Debit
Credit
$67,500
Balance
$67,500
$67,500
Wages Payable
WIP inventory (50% of the
material)
Transfer to WIP inventory
Debit
Credit
Balance
$33,750
$33,750
Debit
$67,500
$168,75
0
$108,00
0
$337,50
0
Credit
$33,750
Wages payable
Transfer to finished goods inventory
Finished goods inventory
WIP inventory
Debit
$715,50
0
Credit
Balance
$715,50
0
$715,50
0
Debit
Credit
Balance
$67,500
$67,500
$67,500
Credit
$168,75
0
Balance
$168,75
0
$168,75
0
Total cost
Materials handling
activity
WIP inventory
Actual cost
Quality inspection activity
WIP inventory
Actual cost
Debit
Balance
$67,500
$236,35
0
$344,25
0
$681,75
0
$715,50
0
$715,50
0
Thomas Carapaica
ID: 100832
Debit
Credit
$108,00
0
Balance
$108,00
0
$108,00
0
Debit
Credit
$337,50
0
Balance
$337,50
0
$337,50
0
WIP
Actual cost
Running machine activity
WIP inventory
Actual cost
9-36
a)
Accounts
receivable
departmen
t
Billing
Dispute
resolution
Allocation
base
Total
cost
Number of bills
prepared
Number of bills
prepared
$48,0
00
$36,0
00
$84,0
00
Total
Total
number of
bills
prepared/dis
putes
Personal
600
bills
600
bills
1,000
1,000
$28,8
00
$21,6
00
$50,4
00
Business
400
bills
400
bills
$19,2
00
$14,4
00
$33,6
00
b)
Activity
Billing
Dispute
resolution
Total
Cost driver
Number of bills
prepared
Number of
disputes
Total
cost
$48,00
0
$36,00
0
$84,00
0
9-37a
Chair Manufacturer
Volum
e of
cost
driver
s
Each
driver
1,000
48
72
500
Busine
ss
$28,80
0
$30,00
0
$58,00
0
$19,20
0
$6,000
$25,00
0
Total
$48,0
00
$36,0
00
$84,0
00
Thomas Carapaica
ID: 100832
Income Statement
Rat
Standa
Activity
Ergo
e
rd
$2,925, $2,760,
Sales revenue
000
000
Direct
$550,0
$500,0
materials
00
00
$400,0
$200,0
Direct labor
00
00
Overhead
costs
Administrati
$312,0
$156,0
78%
on
00
00
Production
$7,2 $360,0
$720,0
setup
00
00
00
Quality
$1,8 $360,0
$360,0
control
00
00
00
$19
$288,0 $1,152,
Distribution
2
00
000
Total overhead
$1,320, $2,388,
costs
000
000
Operating
$655,0 ($328,
profit
00
000)
Total
$5,685,
000
$1,050,
000
$600,0
00
$468,0
00
$1,080,
000
$720,0
00
$1,440,
000
$3,708,
000
$327,0
00
9-40
Activity
Processing orders
Setting up production
Handling materials
Using machines
Performing quality control
Packing
Total est. overhead
Cost
Driver
No. of
orders
No. of runs
Pounds
Machinehrs.
No. of insp.
No. of units
Est. Costs
Driver
Units
Rate
$54,000
200
$270
$216,000
$360,000
100
120,000
$2,160
$3
$288,000
12,000
$24
$72,000
$144,000
$1,134,00
0
45
480,000
$1,600
$0.30
Thomas Carapaica
ID: 100832
Predetermined rate for Direct labor-hour = Estimated activity / Estimated allocation base
Predetermined rate for Direct labor-hour = $1,134,000 / 7,500 hours = $151.20 per hour
Production costs using direct labor-hour
Account
Direct materials
Direct labor
Indirect costs
Total costs
Institutional
$39,000
$6,750
$68,040
$113,790
Standard
$24,000
$6,750
$68,040
$98,790
Silver
$15,000
$9,000
$90,720
$114,720
Total
$78,000
$22,500
$226,800
$327,300
Account
Direct materials
Direct labor
Indirect costs
Processing orders
Setting up production
Handling materials
Using machines
Performing quality
control
Packing
Total cost
Institutio
nal
Standa
rd
$39,000
$24,000
$6,750
$6,750
$3,240
$2,430
$6,480
$6,480
$45,000
$13,920
$18,000
$3,360
$1,620
$12,96
0
$9,000
$1,920
$4,800
$4,800
$4,800
$14,400
$18,000
$7,200
$137,190
$73,020
$2,700
$57,00
0
$27,900
$267,21
0
Silver
$15,00
0
$9,000
Total
$78,000
$22,500
$7,290
$25,920
$72,000
$19,200
The discrepancy between our product costs using direct-labor hours as the allocation base versus
activity-based costing is because the way that overhead costs are allocated. The ABC method is
more precise than our existing direct labor cost method.
9-41
$36,000 / 100 runs = $360 per run
$60,000 / 200 orders = $300 per order
$24,000 / 8,000 pounds = $3.00 per pound
$72,000 / 10,000 machine hours = $7.20 per machine hour
$60,000 / 40 inspections = $1,500 per inspection
$48,000 / 20,000 units = $2.40 per unit
Thomas Carapaica
ID: 100832
Direct materials
Direct labor
Overhead
Total costs
Short
$6,000
$3,000
$15,000
$24,00
0
Direct materials
Direct labor
Setting up production
Processing orders
Handling materials
Using machines
Providing quality
management
Packaging and
shipping
Total Costs
Medium
$3,750
$3,600
$18,000
$25,350
Shor
t
$6,00
0
$3,00
0
$720
$2,40
0
$1,20
0
$3,60
0
$3,00
0
$2,40
0
$22,
320
Medi
um
$3,75
0
$3,60
0
$1,44
0
$2,40
0
$2,40
0
$2,16
0
$3,00
0
$1,20
0
$19,9
50
Tall
$3,000
$3,300
$16,500
$22,80
0
Tall
$3,00
0
$3,30
0
$2,88
0
$1,20
0
$600
$2,16
0
$3,00
0
$720
$16,
860
Explanation
The discrepancy between our product costs using direct-labor hours as the allocation base versus
activity-based costing is because the way that overhead costs are allocated. The ABC method is
more precise than our existing direct labor cost method.
9-42
Activity
Sales
Direct costs
Income Statement
Main
Route 66
Alley Cat
Street
$7,600,00 $11,200,00 $9,500,00
0
0
0
Total
$28,300,00
0
Thomas Carapaica
ID: 100832
Direct
material
$3,000,00
0
$4,800,000
Direct labor
$288,000
$480,000
Variable OH
$939,600
$1,503,360
Contr. Margin
$3,372,40
0
$4,416,640
$4,000,00
0
$1,080,00
0
$2,255,04
0
$2,164,96
0
Fixed OH:
Plant admin.
Other
$11,800,00
0
$1,848,000
$4,698,000
$9,954,000
$1,760,000
$2,800,000
$5,394,00
0
Gross Profit
Income Statement
Main
Route 66
Alley Cat
Street
$7,600,00 $11,200,00 $9,500,00
0
0
0
$28,300,00
0
Direct costs
Direct
material
$3,000,00
0
$4,800,000
$11,800,00
0
Direct labor
$288,000
$480,000
$4,000,00
0
$1,080,00
0
$102,960
$288,000
$418,500
$151,200
$43,200
$159,120
$432,000
$418,500
$241,920
$172,800
$205,920
$432,000
$837,000
$362,880
$432,000
$468,000
$1,152,000
$1,674,000
$756,000
$648,000
Activity
Sales
Variable OH
Mach. Setup
Order proc.
Warehousing
Energy
Shipping
Fixed OH:
Plant admin.
Other
Gross Profit
Total
$1,848,000
$1,760,000
$2,800,000
$5,394,00
0
The ABC method provides more accurate information than other methods. So, as
well as the CFO said, Products have to bear a fair share of all overhead or we wont
be covering all of our costs. By doing this, they would be able to take better
decision due to the accuracy of this method.