Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Avocet Sports
The main significant driver for hero cycles company to acquire a European
based company is to expand their market into globally as avocet is one of
the leading European countries which is ranked among top three in Europe ,
since hero cycles is planning to expand globally this is a significant
opportunitie for hero to enter into European countries like uk because Avocet
is one of the top three distributors of bicycles, e-bikes, bicycle parts and
accessories in the UK and it offers an extensive range of products including
hybrid, folding, road, childrens bikes, e-bikes, Mountain bikes, BMX and
roadster incorporating contemporary technology and design. Its leading
brands include Viking, Coyote, Rooster, Ryedale, Lectro, Concept and Riddick.
As said by Pankaj Munjal, Chairman and MD, Hero Cycles, This acquisition
marks our entry into the European market and plays an important role in
realising our ambition of becoming one of its key players. We are very
excited by our association with Avocet Sports which is one of the most
renowned and trusted names in the cycle segment in the UK,
( http://www.financialexpress.com/article/industry/companies/hero-cyclesacquires-uk-based-cycle-firm-avocet-sports/118197/ )
Expansion into the European market will play an important role in realising
the Hero Cycles Groups plans for growth.
The other drivers for this acquisitions is as follows
technologies.
New Product Mix: Many times it is not profitable for companies to
manufacture products themselves either due to cost constraints or
requirement of huge investments. In such a scenario alliance with
another company can give them the right to sell and diversify their
product range.
Hedging Country Risks: Merger and Acquisitions are also attempted
to reduce the reliance on the Indian markets and escape the local
business cycles.
Synergy effect
i. Economics of scale
ii. Cost reduction
iii. Benefits the company gains through horizontal integration
Eliminating inefficiencies
Industry consolidation
Are there any tax issues involved in such deals given the
current tax structure in India?
Taxation is always one of the most challenging issues in the practice of
business. The taxation challenges are magnified in cross border mergers and
acquisitions. In most cases the acquiring firm, being that it operates in a
foreign land will have to pay higher taxation rates than its competitors in
business that will be classified as local businesses. The unequal tax rates
between the foreign owned business and the locally owned business in cross
border mergers and acquisitions often work against the ambitions of the
acquiring firm. As there develops an unfair playground in relation to tax
remittance to the authorities of the country where the transaction is to take
place, realizing sustainable profitability always becomes elusive. Therefore, it
becomes an important requirement that the taxation aspect of business is
keenly considered before venturing into cross border mergers and
acquisitions.
In the last few years, India has witnessed several high profile M&A tax
controversies. The income tax authorities have been very aggressive and
proactive in scrutinizing deal structures on the grounds of tax avoidance.
While the new Government has promised to address the issue of overreach
by the tax authorities, it still remains unclear whether the general anti
avoidance rules ("GAAR") will be implemented from April 1, 2015. GAAR
gives wide powers to the income tax authorities to challenge the
"commercial substance" of a transaction and thereafter re-characterize the
transaction if the deal structure is found to be an "impermissible avoidance
arrangement".
Apart from GAAR, the other areas where parties have had to be watchful are
o the incidence of tax in the case of indirect transfers i.e. transfer
of foreign securities which derives substantial value from
underlying Indian assets
o undervaluation of shares
o tax withholding obligations
o Transfer pricing adjustments in the case of group transfers.
In order to mitigate some of the tax risks, parties have in the past
(i)
(ii)
(iii)