Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Review
24 1
The relative humidities maintained over saturated and unsaturated salt solutions and of some salt hydrate
mixtures have been collated from the literature over a wide range of temperature. Results are presented for
38 saturated salt solutions, and details listed for salts which are recommended as suitable for humidity control. The control of humidity in the laboratory by the use of salt solutions is critically discussed.
lntroduction
A control of atmospheric humidity is frequently required in
4@-65% R.H. The published data for the best salts in this
242
-20
-10
Y)
30
LO
50
60
80
TEMPERATURE ,t
30
L
TEMPERATURE,
Oc
(f)
Fig. 1. Variation with temperature of relative humidities over saturated salt solutions
(Dashed curves indicate that only data of uncertain reliability are available)
Review
243
TABLE
I
Saturated salt solutions recommended for humidity control
% R.H.
Temperature d(RH)
range, "c 2T' %per "'
Salt
Na0H.H 20
15-25
3045
LiC1.2Hz0
KNOT
Mg(N0,).6Hz0
Na2Crz0,.2H,0
NaBr.2H20
NaNO,
7.0
-
0.00
-0.07
- 10-15
20-70
50-80
-10-30
10-50
5-35
2040
0-50
G50
- 10-35
20-40
10-30
LiCI.H,O
at 25"c
-0.17
-0.01
11.3
22.2
32.7
39.2
48.2
52.8
53.7
58.2
644
68.4
75.1
80.2
84.2
86.5
90.3
92.7
97.0
97.2
+0.03
-0.12
- 0.06
-0.32
-0.18
- 0.29
- 0.27
- 0.28
-0.19
0.00
- 0.02
- 0.07
-0.16
- 0.06
- 0.08
-0.12
- 0.05
5-60
25-50
5-40
2040
5-60
2-5
15-60
- 0.05
2540
Comparisons of % R.H. at 2%
Ref. 1
Ref. 3
Ref. 4
-
15*
20*
-
45*
52
52*
58*
81
88*
88
93
-
6.5
13
19
33
45*
52
52*
57
66
75-76'5
81-89
84-5-89
88*
88
93
100
References
KZSOJ
CUSO4.5H,O
3, 7, 9, 15
11
13
2,4, 11, 18
(NH,)H,PO,
BaCIZ.2H,0
Compound
KI
NaNO,
SrBr2.6H,0
NaBr, .2H20
References
12, 18
3, 12, 13
11
2 4 12, 13,
17
-.
NaCl
4 7,9,
11-13, IS,
3,5, 13
18
~~
11
17
2-4,6,9,
18
Ca(N0,),.4H20
KNO2
18 K,CO,.ZH,O
18
CrO,
NaT.2H,O
K Br
NH,CI
CaCl,.6H ,O
18
2,4,12,18 CaBG.6H;O
3,4,6,9, 17 MgCI2.6H,O
CH,COO.Na.
3, 13
3HzO
SrCl .6H,O
11, 18
CH,COOK.
I .5H20
LiC1.H 20
NaNO
3.4.6.12.18
. ,
NaOH.H,O
2,3,8,9,17
3, 13
2-5, 13
12, 13
5, 12, 17, 18
2-5, 11, 18
5 , 17
2-5, 13, 15,
17, 18
5 , 13, 17
2-5, 13-15,
17, 18
3-5. I8
w00l.~' Therefore, when surface properties are to be investigated, the use of sulphuric acid must be avoided.
Salt hydrate pairs are a third alternative of controlling
relative humidities since systems can be chosen to cover the
full range (see Table 111). However there are disadvantages'
which limit the use of hydrate pairs to very low humidities
(<7%) or to special conditions where the presence of a
liquid phase might be undesirable.
Effect of samples on relative humidities
Although saturated salt solutions can, in theory, handle
large changes in water content without affecting their equilibrium values, it has been found in practice that where
samples absorb moisture a p p r e ~ i a b l y ,the
~ ~ actual relative
humidity over a salt solution remains lower than the true
equilibrium value. A rate of adsorption as low as 4 mg./h
will depress the relative humidity over saturated ammonium
nitrate at 20" (65% R.H.) by 2%33even when a circulation
of air is maintained. For strongly adsorbing materials the
relative humidity may initially be depressed by several tens
of percent and take several days or weeks to come to equilibrium. It has probably not been generally recognised that
these effects can be of such magnitude.
The time taken to achieve equilibrium is a major drawback
even when samples do not strongly adsorb (or liberate) water.
Fine powders have a large surface area and may consequently take a long time to equilibrate even though the rate
of adsorption or desorption is never large. Hardened cement
pastes which contain extensive networks of fine pores and
capillary spaces are an extreme example of this. Such
samples never reach a steady equilibrium at low humidities,34
although the rate of loss of water after one or two weeks is
less than 0.5 mg/g per day.
Design of a laboratory humidity chamber
Any conveniently sized, leak-proof container may be used
as a humidity chamber. Such a container is often an ordinary
desiccator, which has the advantage that it can be evacuated
244
Review
TABLE
111
Relative humidities over some hydrate pairs
-1
zo
10
OO
LO
SULPHURIC ACID.
?I
6Q
80
90
wt -%
Salt
Hydrates
Na2S04
ZnSO,
SrCI,
CH3COONa
BaBr,
NaI
Oxalic acid
SrBr,
0+ 10
NaOH
LiCl
CaCI,
1
ia
I
20
I
30
40
50
, i
I
70
60
NaI
Ca(N03)*
MB(NO~)~
Na,Cr,O,
NaBr
Sr(N0J2
80
SOLUTE, wt.-%
L l
0'
10
20
40
TEMPERATURE.
70%
I
50
~
60
70
1
80
Oc
SKI,
SrBr,
BaCl
BaBG
cuso4
+2
2+6
2+6
0.89
0.73
15-5
0.45
0.40
11
11
Of2
Mg(N03)z
81
58,55
35
27
0+3
1 +2
0+2
O f1
Salt
ko I
I +6
2+6
ZnBr,
CdSO4
"/.R.H. at d (RH),
25"c
dT
8.7
7.5
2.1
2.1
0.50
oc
References
16,24-26
16, 25
5 , 11, 16
5, 16,26
11
0.19
0.16
0.20
24, 26
0.13
0.07
0-03
16
10
TABLE
1V
Transition temperatures of hydrates
Temperature,
OC
Transition
5 , 16
5, 11
16
References
9
H,O+anhydrous
2H,O+H,O
64-3
18.8
4H.O+2H,O
- - - -----
45.5
. _
9. I 1
6HzO+4HzO
2H,O+anhydrous
4HzO+3HzO
6H,0+2H20
2H,O+anhydrous
2H,O+anhydrous
4H,O+anhydrous
6H2O+2H,O
6H,O+H,O
2Hz0 +HZ0
2HiO4H;O
~HzO+~H~O
29.4
68-1
42.1
30.0
74.8
50.6
3 1.3
61.5
88.0
101.9
107.9
95.9
9,11
12'
8
10
12
12
27
11
11
11
11
11
References
International Critical Tables, 1926, Vol. 1, p. 67 (New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.)
Burns, R., Bell Teleph. Syst. tech. Publs, Monogr. 8-986,1937
OBrien, F. E. M., J. scient. Instrum., 1948, 25, 73
(a) Stokes, R. H., & Robinson, R. A., Ind. Engng Chem. ind.
(int.) Edn., 1949, 41, 2013; (b) Robinson, R. A., & Stokes,
R. H., Electrolytic Solutions, 1959, 2nd Edn, (London:
Butterworths Scientific Publs)
Richardson, G. M., & Malthus, R. S., J. appl. Chem., Lund.,
1955,5,557
Edgar, G., & Swan, W. O., 1. Am. chem. Soc., 1922, 44, 570
Leopold, H. G., & Johnston, J., J. Am. chem. Soc., 1927, 49,
1974
Ewing, W. W., J. Am. chem. SOC.,1927, 49, 1963
Adams, J. R., & Merz, A. R., J. ind. Engng Chem., 1929,21, 305
l o Ewing, W. W., Klinger, E., & Brandner, J. D., J. Am. chern.
SOC.,
1934,56, 1053
Review
245
Wexler, A., & Hasegawa, S., J. Res. natn. Bur. Stand., 1954,
53A, 19
I h Wylie, R. G. in Humidity and Moisture. Vol. 3. Fundamentals
and Standards, (Eds. Wexler, A., & Wildhack, W. A.), 1965,
p. 507 (New York: Reinhold Publ. Co.)
Hedlin, C. P., & Trofirnenkoff, E. N., Ref. 16, p. 519
I n Acheson, D. T., Ref. 16, p. 521
l 9 international Critical Tables, 1928, Vol. 111, p. 303 (New York:
McGraw-Hill Book Co.)
zo Shankman, S., & Gordon, A. E., J. Am. chem. Sue., 1939, 61,
2370
21 Greenwalt, C. H., J. Ind. Engng Chem., 1925,13, 522
z 2 Stokes, R. H., Trans. Faruaizy Soc., 1945,51,642
23 Robinson, R. A., Trans. Faraday Sac., 1945,51,756
24 Baxter, G . P., & Lansing, J. E., J. Am. chem. Soc., 1920, 42,
419
2 5 Wilson, R.E., J. Am. chem. SOC.,
1921,43,704
2 6 Baxter, G. P., & Cooper, W. C., J. Am. chem. Suc., 1924, 46,
923
2 7 Sidewick. N. V
.. Chemical Elements and their Comoounds.
1950, 901.I, p: 256 (London: Oxford Univ. Press)
2 * Schlunder, E. W., Ref. 16, p. 535
2 9 Kawasaki, K., & Kanou, K., Ref. 16, p. 531
30 Pray, R. E., & Schieltz, N. C., J. Colloid Interface Sci., 1966, 21,
l3
.
3
353