Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Martin
McKee
To
Davies,
Sally
Date
10
November
2014 15:47
Title
more on ecigs
Content
Sally, not sure if you have been looking at the new ad...
See
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ecigarettesshould-not-be-advertised--we-dont-even-know-howdangerous-they-are-9851738.html
BTW please be assured I don't normally spend my day
browsing these images....
I've been doing various news outlets all day
Martin
Martin
McKee
Davies,
Sally
11
November
2014 17:59
e-cigs (again)
Dear Sally
Not sure if you have seen the Public Health England
"conversation" on using e-cigs in public spaces. You should!
See attached, plus my response
I assume you also saw the advert:
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ecigarettesshould-not-be-advertised--we-dont-even-know-howdangerous-they-are-9851738.html
Martin
Davies,
Sally
'Martin
McKee'
11
November
2014
21:56:22
+0000
e-cigs (again)
McKee
Davies;
Sally
11 Nov
2014 22:12
e-cigs(again)
Yes, I will ask John Middleton (I'm off to New York in the
morning).
It has been an intensive 2 days here - John Middleton,
Attachment
http://www.indepen
dent.co.uk/voices/c
omment/ecigarette
s-should-not-beadvertised--wedont-even-knowhow-dangerousthey-are9851738.html
http://www.indepen
dent.co.uk/voices/c
omment/ecigarette
s-should-not-beadvertised--wedont-even-knowhow-dangerousthey-are9851738.html
note the my
response is in the
link
http://www.newscie
ntist.com/article/dn
26534-first-
Robin Ireland and I have been doing almost non stop media
interviews (and of course the blogs and tweets are having a
field day, photoshopping my face onto all sorts of things...)
Not sure if you saw the ad - it is simply incredible....
Also not sure if I sent the 2 bits I did for the Independent
and New Scientist yesterday... [Redacted out of scope]
See:
http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn26534-first-smokingtv-ad-for-half-a-century-a-bad-move.html#.VGKIOPmsWSp
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/comment/ecigarettesshould-not-be-advertised--we-dont-even-know-howdangerous-they-are-9851738.html
We did have one coup - I got a screenshot of the attached
tweet before the advertising company that made the ad took
it down - they then e-mailed me in panic when they realised
what they had said...
There are papers coming out almost daily now confirming
our fears, on nicotine induced angiogenesis in tumours, on
flavourings, and on uptake by kids. I really should do a
summary sometime but not sure when.
[Redacted out of scope]
Martin
McKee
Davies;
Sally
12
November
2014 19:17
e-cigs (again)
Martin
McKee
Davies;
Sally
15
November
2014 22:34
e-cigs (again)
Best wishes
Martin
Sally,
John M spoke to Kevin and we seem to have a delay on
launching it - so not tomorrow. We are now going to
question whether it in the spirit of the new FCTC statement post Moscow [Redacted out of scope]
Martin
I'll leave you alone after this but thought you might want to
see an account of the e-cig summit last week - by one of the
ecig advocates...
Interesting quote "I had no idea how positive Public Health
smoking-tv-ad-forhalf-a-century-abadmove.html#.VGKIO
PmsWSp
http://www.indepen
dent.co.uk/voices/c
omment/ecigarette
s-should-not-beadvertised--wedont-even-knowhow-dangerousthey-are9851738.html
Note the attached
tweet was not
attached.
Martin
McKee
16
November
2014, 12:58
e-cigs(again)
Martin
McKee
Davies;
Sally
16
December
2014 10:07
FW Teen E-Cigarette
Use Steams Past
Smoking, Survey
Finds US News
Martin
McKee
Davies,
Sally
11 February
2015 15:03
http://www.mirror.c
o.uk/news/technolo
gy-
raising $110,000
fightback fund in
THREE HOURS Mirror Online
science/science/ecig-bigwigs-revealplan-silence5137978