Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amyloid Cascades,
Inflammation and Oxidative
Stress Creating Age-Related
Neuroplasticity Failure?
Douglas F. Watt, Ph.D.
Though wise men at their end know Grave men, near death, who see
dark is right, with blinding sight
Because their words had forked no Blind eyes could blaze like meteors
lightning they and be gay,
Do not go gentle into that good Rage, rage against the dying of the
night. light.
Good men, the last wave by, crying And you, my father, there on the
how bright sad height,
Their frail deeds might have danced Curse, bless me now with your
in a green bay, fierce tears, I pray.
Rage, rage against the dying of the Do not go gentle into that good
light. night.
Rage, rage against the dying of the
light.
Aging is . . . . vastly over-rated!
Bible states that aging is ‘wages of sin’? Colorful but . .
Appears to be more the wages of metabolism and
defense (damage to multiple systems from inflammation,
oxidative stress, other products of energy generation).
Damage to basic cellular components (DNA, nuclear &
mitochondrial), glycation of proteins (sugar-protein
bonds) → advanced glycation end products (‘AGE’)
(e.g deterioration of collagen), ↑ junk proteins (amyloid).
Major role for inflammation (and INFLAM ↑ OS) . . . we
are slowly eaten from within by own immune systems.
INFLAM may increase with age (↑ pro-INFLAM cytokines)
Evidence that defenses against OS & regulation of
INFLAM decline with age → losing tug of war between
forces of cellular protection vs cellular degradation.
Aging process may even accelerate?
“Youth is wonderful, and it is a
shame to waste it on the young!”
Most lifestyle choices that decrease CAD and CA also
decrease AD (fruits/veggies, ω-3, exercise, good quality
sleep, ↓ chronic stress), suggesting convergent
mechanisms across the diseases of aging (DOA).
Sleep, exercise and ω-3/ω-6 ratio all decrease tonic
INFLAM. Exercise upregulates antioxidant defenses.
Calorie restriction (↓~30%) is gold standard for reducing
both DOA & aging itself, but . . . .
CR a painfully difficult lifestyle modification (<1%).
Suggests key area is finding CR mimetics (e.g.
resveratrol,) and importance of finding even more
effective CR mimetics.
CR mimetics could in theory prevent or delay all DOA,
including AD (one exception - ALS accelerated by CR).
The Big Picture (Diseases of Aging/AD)
Aging population, (large demographic group of baby
boomers), heading into decades of greatest risk.
Prevention effort re: all ‘DOA’ (CA, CAD/MI/CVA, Diabetes,
AD, arthritis) virtually nonexistent (2-4% of health care
dollar spent on prevention, 75-90% on established DOA).
Old adage: ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure,
but is real ratio > 1 oz to 500 lbs? No cure in sight for DOA
AD shows no sign of decreasing its penetration (doubles
incidence every five years starting with 60-65).
AD may even increase (explosion of DM & obesity), as CV
disease risk increases AD risk. Comorbidities of INFLAM?
No major “disease-modifying” treatment yet available, esp.
if one considers treatment to start only once patient is
demented (several new drugs may be such a treatment?).
No definitive laboratory measure, although several
available good biomarkers.
Popular Conceptions Re: AD
If someone is becoming forgetful in their old age,
that is more likely aging rather than AD.
AD has little to nothing to do w/ diet or lifestyle.
Exercise has no impact on either the generation
or treatment of AD.
Genes account for most of AD.
AD is caused by exotic cellular derangements and
is not related to basic aging processes.
AD is largely untreatable. Not much point in
cholinesterase inhibitors. No other treatments.
AD is an aggressive disease and often causes a
fairly rapid decline.
EACH OF THESE IS MORE WRONG THAN RIGHT!
SOME BASICS ABOUT AD
Most common brain disease in US (& possibly globally)
A neuropsychiatric epidemic, in context of “graying of
America.” Frequently quoted statistics (~ 4/5 mil) are
serious underestimation.
Late Dx contributes to serious underestimation, along
with overreliance on MMSE, and overestimation of VD.
Incidence doubles every five years after age of 60 to 65.
Suggests etiology of AD is intrinsically linked to brain's
aging, and/or responses to aging.
By middle 80’s, 35-45% chance of some stage of
Alzheimer's disease, all other factors being equal.
Including earliest prodromal stages (MCI amnestic
subtype), incidence may be significantly greater.
Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, & Evans DA
(2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population. Prevalence
estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol, 60:1119-1122.
Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, & Evans DA
(2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population. Prevalence
estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol 60:1119-1122.
Hebert LE, Scherr PA, Bienias JL, Bennett DA, & Evans DA.
(2003). Alzheimer disease in the US population. Prevalence
estimates using the 2000 census. Arch Neurol, 60:1119-1122.
Age
BRAIN HEALTH
Pre-Clinical
MCI
NOT here
(where current
Rx often starts)
AD
From Mony de Leon,
2008 (Alz Forum)
TIME
Need for Early Diagnosis
Recent candidates: HC atrophy, CSF protein alterations,
changes in rate of ventricular enlargement in aging,
regional cortical thinning, SPECT/PET patterns.
Current CSF markers: ↑ total tau, ↑ phosphorylated tau,
amyloid β42 (↓ instead of ↑!). Spinal taps unpleasant.
Most desirable would be serum assays (no spinal tap).
Five protein biomarker molecular signature recently
showed 96% total accuracy predicting clinical AD: IL-1α,
IL-3, EGF (epidermal growth factor), TNF-α & G-CSF
(granulocyte colony-stimulating factor - ↑ white cells).
All these are cytokines! Cytokine elevation marks
transition from MCI to mild dementia (suggests AD
brought on by INFLAM, or AD leads to INFLAM, or both).
But this is too late!!! We need biomarkers that define
beginning of clinical decline!
Early Biomarker Aβ Ligand PET vs.
Structural Atrophy Biomarker on MRI
Progression of Biomarkers in AD
Aβ is identified by CSF Aβ42 or PET amyloid imaging. Tau-mediated neuronal injury and
dysfunction is identified by CSF tau or fluorodeoxyglucose-PET. Brain structure is measured by
use of structural MRI. Aβ=β-amyloid. MCI=mild cognitive impairment.
Variables Might Shift Biomarkers
Current Ability To Assay Biomarkers
Is Missing Critical Components!!
No reliable chemical biomarkers of toxic oligomeric forms
of soluble Aβ or other soluble Aβ or diffuse plaques.
Absence of PET ligands for density of NFTs is a serious
gap in both our research and clinical tool set.
Absence of accepted biomarker for microglial activation
(imaging CNS inflammation).
Absence of biomarker for synaptic function/loss
(appearing to be the most critical biological issue in AD).
Doubtful that virtually any imaging or other biomarker is
likely to be as revealing as postmortem brain biopsy.
However, better biomarkers would offer huge gains to
early diagnosis, early treatment, & gauging effective Rx.
Cognitive Screening Issues
Identification of early amnestic issues is critical, and
cannot be done reliably through clinical interviewing.
Most commonly applied screening instrument (MMSE)
Underestimates cognitive deficit seriously (not normed properly).
Poor screen for short-term memory issues (critical!)
Poor screen for executive issues (important).
Poor screen for naming and fluency issues (important).
Montréal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): much better
Decent assessment of short-term memory (? delay interval?)
Assessment of verbal fluency.
Some assessment of at least a subset of executive functions.
Not in widespread use (but improving).
Requires more time than MMSE but returns much better data.
Requires minimal training (but more than MMSE).
Functional Imaging Biomarker
EC Glucose Metabolism
4-year advance MCI prediction
Accuracy
84%
de Leon et al, PNAS, 2001
Hippocampus metabolism: automated sampling
Accuracy 84%
Mosconi et al Neurobiol. Aging, 2007
AD NL
PIB
FDG
Li , Rinne, de Leon in press EJNM 2008
Atrophy and Metabolism
10-Year decline from NL to AD (de Leon, 2008)
NL MCI AD
1993 1997 2003
E E E
NYU 2008
Accuracy for FDG and PIB
PIB
AD vs NL MCI vs NL
FDG
PIB -Frontal 96 75
L. SS 94 SP 100 SS 62 SP 100
FDG -HIPPO 92 85
SS 88 SP 100 SS 85 SP 86
83% 83%
Aβ42/40 Isoprostane
69% 74%
TANGLING &
FENTON
APOPTOSIS
CHEMISTRY
Peroxynitrite as mediator between
plaques and tangles?
Aβ deposits stimulate production of NO/superoxide
through activating microglia and astrocytes.
Peroxynitrite (from NO + superoxide) upstream effector
for tau phosphorylation.
In recent study, research group (Zhang et al.) injected
SIN-1 (peroxynitrite generator) bilaterally into rat HC.
Levels of nitrated and hyperphosphorylated tau markedly
increased immediately after drug administration (~ hrs).
GSK-3β involved in peroxynitrite-induced tau hyper-
phosphorylation. Phosphorylated tau degraded efficiently
by proteasomes, but nitrated tau more resistant.
However, did not cause cell death, and tau alterations
were reversed within 48 hrs.
More long-term studies will be necessary (OS long term
issue).
Intracellular β-
Amyloid driving a
destructive cascade?
Promotes tangles, synaptic &
Ca++ channel dysfunction,
inhibits proteasomes,
increases oxidative stress,
decreases mitochondrial
energy generation. APOE 4
allele → ↑ production &
uptake of βA.
Therapy Opportunities,
Links to Neuroplasticity Challenge
Where is ACh decline in AD:
Possible Interactions?
ACh promotes α (alpha) secretase (sAPP) which blocks Aβ.
BF ACh tangling is excellent marker for severity of AD.
ACh deprivation (from BF tangling) leads to cortical
dysfunction and likely neuroplasticity challenge/decrement.
Aβ blocks ACh synthesis and ACh neurotransmission in BF.
ACh deprivation promotes Aβ pathway (positive feedback)?
In PD, exposure to anti-ACh drugs predicts AD/Aβ & tangles.
M1 receptors preserved in cortex, nicotine receptors and M2
more affected/pruned out. Muscarinic agonists?
ACh modulates effects of central cytokines, reducing potential
for delirium in peripheral infection.
ACh deprivation is not primary correlate of STM troubles but
may be very relevant to vulnerability to confusional states.
Increased ACh tone promotes neuroplasticity and decreases
pro-INFLAM cytokines, while raising IL-4.
Recent study shows that chronic anti-ACh drugs increase risk
for developing AD, suggesting that ↓ ACh tone is etiologic.
Cholinergic Systems in AD
Possible Interactions Between Cholinergic
Deficit, Infection and Synaptic Dysfunction
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of an integrative treatment approach
on cognitive performance. The study sample comprised 35 medically ill patients (20 male,
15 female) with an average age of 71.05, who were diagnosed with mild dementia and
depression. These patients were evaluated at baseline and at six, 12, and 24 months of
treatment, which included antidepressants (sertraline, citalopram, or venlafaxine XR, alone
or in combination with bupropion XR), cholinesterase inhibitors (donepezil, rivastigmine
or galantamine), as well as vitamins and supplements (multivitamins, vitamin E, alpha-
lipoic acid, omega-3 and coenzyme Q-10). Patients were encouraged to modify their diet
and lifestyle and perform mild physical exercises. RESULTS SHOW THAT THE
INTEGRATIVE TREATMENT NOT ONLY PREVENTED COGNITIVE
DECLINES FOR 24 MONTHS BUT EVEN IMPROVED COGNITION RELATIVE
TO BASELINE, ESPECIALLY MEMORY AND ‘FRONTAL LOBE’ FUNCTIONS.
Impact of Lifestyle Variables
on Oxidative Stress and INFLAM?
Sleep, exercise and diets high in phytochemicals & Omega-3 are
anti-inflammatory and control OS. High phytochemical diets down
regulate inflammation and oxidative stress via several mechanisms.
Exercise promotes slow wave sleep (which is anti-inflammatory).
Exercise up regulates antioxidant defense mechanisms (adaptive
response to increased oxidative stress in exercising organism).
Social comfort decreases stress, and stress promotes inflammation.
High phytochemical diets also reduce glycation of protein as does
exercise. Advanced glycation end products promote inflammation.
Inflammation itself promotes oxidative stress.
Oxidative stress damages mitochondrial DNA → eventual cellular
failure and programmed cell death.
All lifestyle issues thus impinge on biggies of OS, INFLAM, GLYCA
and promote either LT cellular protection or cellular degradation.
How are Modern Lifestyles → AD
(& Other Diseases Of Aging)?
EVOLUTIONARY CURRENT TECHNOLOGIC
ENVIRONMENT ENVIRONMENT
1) Intense aerobic exercise 1) Little aerobic exercise
2) High phytochemical diets 2) Low phytochemical diets
3) Omega-6/Omega-3 ratio 3) Omega-6/Omega-3 ratio
between 4:1 to 2:1 between 20:1 to 40:1
4) Calorie limitations (‘calorie 4) Unlimited calories (‘calorie
restriction’) enhancement’)
5) 9+ hours sleep (see #1) 5) 7 or less hours of sleep
6) Intimate social groups 6) Social isolation common
7) High stress related to 7) High stress related to social
homeostatic needs needs & other issues
Conclusions: We are in an alien environment from the standpoint of our genome,
one promoting inflammation, oxidative stress, glycation of proteins, and long-term
biological failure. Promotion of Diseases of Aging is a primary consequence.