Ambidextrous R&D: Balancing Innovation and Growth with
Efficiency and Reliability
"Organizational Ambidexterity: the balancing of
exploitation-exploration tensions is much like riding a bike it requires a continuous and irregular shifting of control system use over time." (McCarthy & Gordon, 2011: 255) R&D organizations by definition need to be innovative, generating new knowledge and competencies. However, they also face demands to be efficient and reliable, in other words to use and adapt existing knowledge so as to innovate in a productive, timely and reliable way. balance two contradictory organizational behaviours and modes of learning: exploration and exploitation Exploration has long-term time horizons and involves activities such as search, risk taking, experimentation, play, discovery, creativity and innovation.
Exploitation is characterized by short-term time
horizons and focuses on refinement, efficiency, reliability and implementation. With such differences, the ability to develop and maintain an appropriate balance between exploration and exploitation in the same R&D organizational unit is challenging and requires a capability known as contextual ambidexterity (Gibson and Birkinshaw, 2004).
each type of control, depends on the goals of the
R&D organization. In the left column of Table 1 we list four kinds of R&D strategic goals growth, innovation, reliability and efficiency, each of which is individually oriented toward each of the four types of control system. The right-hand column of Table 1 indicates how the four management control systems combine to
produce the behaviours and control orientations
necessary for contextual ambidexterity. Conclusion First, measuring performance is important; but it is only one aspect of management control. Thus, it is important to reflect on the different control systems at your disposal, and move beyond the obvious diagnostic-based measures and rewards.
Second, the extent to which you use different
types of management control system will depend on your strategic goals. The control of people, and their activities and outcomes should be led by a strategy.
Third, an organizations effective exploitationexploration balance is likely to change over time.
This is because an optimum mix of exploitationexploration at one point in time is likely to become unsuitable as industry and organizational conditions change. Thus, the balancing of exploitation-exploration tensions is much like riding a bike it requires a continuous and irregular shifting of control system use over time