Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Applied Energy
journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/apenergy
Catalonia Institute for Energy Research (IREC), Jardins de les Dones de Negre 1, 08930 Sant Adri de Bess, Barcelona, Spain
Departament dElectrnica, Facultat de Fsica, Universitat de Barcelona, Mart i Franqus 1-11, 08028 Barcelona, Spain
h i g h l i g h t s
" Improved reactions at the positive electrode in all-vanadium redox ow batteries.
" Graphene-derived and PAN-modied electrodes have been successfully prepared.
" Modication with bimetallic CuPt3 nanocubes yielded the best catalytic behavior.
" N and O-containing groups enhances the vanadium ow battery performance.
a r t i c l e
i n f o
Article history:
Received 1 August 2012
Received in revised form 28 January 2013
Accepted 1 February 2013
Available online 5 March 2013
Keywords:
All-vanadium redox ow battery
Graphene-supported
PAN-functionalized felt
Energy storage
Electrochemical properties
a b s t r a c t
Two strategies for improving the electroactivity towards VO2 =VO
2 redox pair, the limiting process in allvanadium redox ow batteries (VFBs), were presented. CuPt3 nanoparticles supported onto graphene
substrate and nitrogen and oxygen polyacrylonitrile (PAN)-functionalized electrodes materials have been
evaluated. The morphology, composition, electrochemical properties of all electrodes prepared was characterized with eld emission-scanning electrode microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, cyclic
voltammetry, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy and cell chargedischarge test. The presence of
the CuPt3 nanocubes and nitrogen and oxygen functionalities enhance the electrocatalytic activity of
the electrodes materials accelerating the oxygen and electron transfer processes. The battery performance was also evaluated using PAN-functionalized electrodes exhibiting a high of energy efciency of
84% (at current density 20 mA cm2) up to 30th cycle, indicating a promising alternative for improving
the VFB.
2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Because of the insufcient fossil-fuel-based energy supplies and
the increase of the electricity generated from renewable sources
(e.g. photovoltaic and wind energy), the development of the global
energy storage strategies has become a major issue in order to
compensate the uctuations introduced in the grid by the aforementioned sources [13]. A broad set of different storage technologies has been developed [46]. In this framework, in contrast with
other secondary batteries, redox ow batteries show great promise
for economical storage of electrical energy [710] due to several
attractive features including long cycle life, low maintenance cost
and exible and modularity design which is well-suited for largescale application because of independence between energy capacity and power rating. Redox ow batteries are an electrochemical
energy storage technology where the energy, instead of being
Corresponding author. Tel.: +34 93 3562615; fax: +34 93 3563802.
E-mail address: cox@irec.cat (C. Flox).
0306-2619/$ - see front matter 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.02.001
VO2 2H e
discharge
charge
345
V3 e
charge
discharge
V2
Eo 0:26 V v s: SHE
As a result, the standard open-circuit voltage (OCV) of VFB single cell is 1.26 V. General characteristics of VFB are presented in Table 1 [1015].
A number of technological advantages are often highlighted,
such as, low response time (0.001 s) and long system life since
the electrolytes do not undergo degradation (10,000 cycles with
estimated life of 715 years depending of the application), as well
as a very low self discharge [16]. However, this technology shows
some drawbacks, such as a relatively poor energy-to-weight ratio
approximately 25 Wh kg1[9], which is quite low if compared to
other rechargeable battery types i.e. lithium ion (80200 Wh kg1).
On the other hand, since oxygen and electron processes are necessary for the reaction (1), the positive electrode reaction suffers
from the slow and complex kinetics affecting more signicantly
[1720], in contrast with negative electrode reaction which implies
an electron transfer process. For these reasons the improvement of
the VFB requires a higher energy density electrolyte as well as
higher efciency electrodes. So, aiming to overcome these inconveniences, the development of new electrode materials plays a key
initial role.
Since a sulfuric acid solution is used as the supporting electrolyte in VFB, carbon electrode materials are preferably chosen because of their chemical stability in this medium, high specic
surface area, high strength and wide potential window, but these
materials have been proven to show a poor electrochemical activity to the positive reaction [1722]. In this framework, this study is
focused on the study of characteristics and performance of a novel
electrode for the cathodic reaction of a VFB based on:
(i) Chemical activation of 2-D graphene electrode material
using CuPt3 nanocubes bimetallic nanoparticles, chosen as
preliminary stoichiometric combination, morphology and
size whose effect has been compared with that of Pt nanocubes [23].
(ii) Thermal activation under NH3/O2 (1:1) atmosphere in different temperatures and times conditions applied to 3-D polyacrylonitrile (PAN) graphite felt electrode. Large amounts of
N- and O-containing groups have been introduced onto the
surface electrode [24].
Both activations applied to carbon materials lead to modify the
electron-donor properties of the surface enhancing the oxygen
transfer processes involved in the reaction (1) [19], what causes
a fast faradaic redox reaction. The novel material electrodes have
been investigated by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical
impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in order to evaluate their
Table 1
General properties of all-vanadium redox ow battery.
Electrolyte
composition
OCV (V)
100% SOCa
Charge/discharge
current density
(mA cm2)
Cell type
Overall charge/
discharge
efciency (%)
References
1.6
10130
15 kW bipolar stacks
80% at 40 mA cm2
[11,12]
1.6
40
Flow cell
83%
[13,14]
1.6
85
80% at 85 mA cm2
[15]
346
Nafion membrane
Inner face of
bipolar plate
with sputtered
layer of copper
Viton gasket
Viton gasket
Viton gasket
PAN-felt electrodes
End-plates
Fig. 1. Schematic diagram of in-house VFB single-cell and expanded view of cell components.
EE CE VE
347
Fig. 3. CV obtained for (1) HTGO, (2) Pt/HTGO and (3) CuPt3/HTGO electrodes in
0.5 mol dm3 VOSO4 solutions in 3 mol dm3 H2SO4 at a scan rate of 20 mV s1.
dox peaks, leading to increment of the higher current values compared to the previous HTGO electrode. This is correlated with the
redox behavior of the electroactive HO-containing functional
groups at the Pt or CuPt3 nanocubes. On the other hand, the current
density increased from 29.4 to 40.2 mA cm2 and the oxidation
peak potential decreased from 0.58 V vs. Hg/HgSO4 to 0.54 V vs.
Hg/HgSO4 when comparing the Pt/HTGO and CuPt3/HTGO electrodes, respectively. The DE is 0.22 V and 0.29 V for CuPt3/HTGO
and Pt/HTGO electrodes, respectively. However, this value was still
larger than the ideal value of 0.059 V for fast electrode kinetics. It is
worth remarking that the CuPt3 nanocubes displayed the highest
electrocatalytic activity among all the electrodes tested, which is
due to the positive synergistic effect from the presence of OH
groups at the surface of CuPt [3638]. These OH groups onto
graphene surface could play an important role because they catalyze the redox reaction by generating active sites for the positive
reaction of VFB
The values of Ipa/Ipc were 1.07 and 1.12 for CuPt3/HTGO and Pt/
HTGO electrodes, respectively. These values are close to the ideal
unity expected for a reversible system, indicating a signicant
enhancement of the electrocatalytic activity.
3.2. N- and O-functionalized PAN electrode for in VFB
Fig. 4 shows the morphology observed by FESEM for the
unmodied PAN and PAN-derived electrodes. Comparing the dPAN
(400, 24) electrode with the untreated one, no obvious change is
observed on the surface morphology. The same effect can be
348
(a)
(b)
50 nm
(c)
50 nm
(d)
50 nm
30 nm
(e)
30 nm
(f)
30 nm
(g)
30 nm
Fig. 4. FESEM images for (a) untreated PAN, (b) PAN (400, 24), (c) PAN (500, 6), (d) PAN (500, 24), (e) PAN (500, 36), (f) PAN (600, 6) and (g) PAN (600, 12) electrodes.
observed with dPAN (500, 6), but the surfaces of this electrode are
cleaner than those of the untreated one. This phenomenon can be
caused by the weak reaction between NH3 and graphite felt removing the surface contaminants. However, the roughness surface increases treatment time from 6 to 36 h leading to small pores
scattered which became larger and deeper because of the pressure
of the NH3/O2 gas mixture on the ber surface caused by longer
treatments. Finally, when the dPAN material was obtained at
600 C for 6 h, the dPAN bers underwent a clear deformation, as
shown in Fig. 4f and longer treatment leads to a weakening of
the graphite ber mechanical properties (see Fig. 4g). Note that
the dPAN (600, 24) and dPAN (600, 36) bers have not been taken
into account because it would lead to reduce considerably their
electric conductivity and to lower their mechanical properties.
The electrochemical parameters (i.e. anodic peak potential value and current density) obtained from the CV at 1 mV s1 have
been represented in Figs. 5 and 6 as a function of all treatments
in order to understanding of the optimal conditions for the thermal
activation treatment. As can be seen in Figs. 5 and 6, for all temperatures of treatment, the anodic current density increases with time
of treatment until it attains the maximum value and afterwards
displays a downward trend with high time of treatment. The anodic current density approaches a maximum of 27.9, 37.1 and
30.77 mA cm2 for dPAN (400, 24), dPAN (500, 24) and dPAN
(600, 6) electrodes, respectively.
However, the anodic peak potential (Fig. 6) values approaches a
minimum of 0.525 V (vs. Hg/Hg2SO4) for dPAN (400, 24) and dPAN
(500, 24) and 0.528 V (vs. Hg/Hg2SO4) for dPAN (600, 6), respectively. Low anodic peak potential is benecial for improving the
energy storage efciency because it implies a lower charge voltage
for VFB. It should be noticed that duration of treatment higher than
6 h for temperature of 600 C leads to signicant reduction of electric conductivity, and consequently present a poor electrocatalityc
activity towards reaction (1). For this reason, dPAN (600, 24) and
dPAN (600, 36) electrodes have not been taken into account.
Fig. 5. Relationship between anodic peak current density obtained from CV with
0.5 mol dm3 VOSO4 solution in 3 mol dm3 H2SO4 at scan rate 1 mV s1 and
treated time of thermal activation for each temperature applied at untreated
electrode (1), 400 C (2), 500 C (3) and 600 C (4).
Fig. 7. CV obtained for untreated PAN and PAN (500, 24) electrodes in
0.5 mol dm3solution in 3 mol dm3 H2SO4 at scan rate 1 mV s1.
349
2
steps involved in the VO
redox reaction. Z real (1.1 X) at Z
2 =VO
imaginary = 0 is the ohmic resistance that combines the solution,
electrode and contact resistance. This ohmic resistance keeps almost constant for all dPAN electrodes. The arc (high frequencies
range) reects the charge transfer reaction at the electrode/electrolyte interface and the radius is the charge transfer resistance. The
smaller arc radius of the semicircle implies a faster reaction, so it
can be seen, the charge transfer reaction resistance follows the order: raw PAN electrodes >> dPAN (500, 6) > dPAN (500, 24). Therefore both EIS and CV result show that both the reduction and
2
oxidation processes of VO
redox couple are enhanced on
2 =VO
dPAN (500, 24) electrode.
Furthermore, ECSA value has been estimated from the Randles
Sevcik equation for electrodes treated at 500 C and the results are
expressed in the following order (the ECSA value obtained in
cm2/mg is given in parenthesis): untreated dPAN (0.78) < dPAN
(500, 6) (1.09) < dPAN (500, 24) (1.35) > dPAN (500, 36) (1.13).
These results demonstrate that the increment of ECSA for the
PAN-derived electrodes treated at 6, 24 and 36 h is 40%, 73% and
45% higher, respectively, compared to that for the untreated PAN
electrode, conrming the remarkable electrocatalytic effect
provides by the N- and O-containing groups. Additionally, the
slope value obtained from the plots of log(Ip) vs. log(v) for all
electrodes studied are approach to 0.50 showing a linear relationship indicating semi-innite diffusion control. Notwithstanding,
these ECSA value are considered estimated or approximate due
to the nature of the porous electrodes analyzed which could
introduce different diffusion gradients on the surface of the
electrode [32,33].
Finally, N- and O-content onto surface created was investigated
by XPS of untreated and dPAN electrodes treated at 500 C for 24 h.
XPS analysis reveal that the content of N-groups are increased from
0.72% to 7.7% for untreated PAN and dPAN (500, 24) electrodes and
the O-groups are increased from 22.3% to 31.7%. The mechanism
proposed for the reaction (1) is represented in Fig. 9 [1720,39].
To corroborate the well-performance of this treatment a comparison of the behavior of the graphite felt electrodes treated in
NH3/O2 atmosphere at 500 C for 24 h vs. that of untreated graphite
felt electrodes has been carried out by galvanostatic cycling of a
monocell battery prototype (Fig. 10). The cycling experiment using
the untreated PAN reveals a 47% energy efciency (85% coulombic
efciency and 55% voltage efciency), whereas the same battery
Fig. 8. Nyquits plots of the untreated PAN, (j); dPAN (500, 6), (d); dPAN (500, 24), and (N) electrodes.
350
Fig. 9. Mechanism proposed of the O-containing groups towards the VO2 =VO
2
redox couple.
medium has been successfully achieved by means of two strategies: (i) Graphene-decorated with CuPt3 nanoparticles and (ii)
commercial polyacrilonytrile-felt treated at 500 C in NH3/O2
(1:1) atmosphere (dPAN (500, 24) electrode). These highly effective
strategies accelerate the oxygen and electron transfer processes in
the electrode/electrolyte interface by the presence of O-containing
groups at surface of electrode showing good morphological properties and large electrochemical surface area. Furthermore, the performance and longevity of the VFB single-cell prototype using
dPAN (500, 24) electrode have been evaluated showing energy efciency of 84% (85% of VE and 99% of CE) at a current density of
20 mA cm2 up to 30th cycles, leading to step forward in the VFB
scale-up.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the European Regional Development Funds (ERDF, FEDER Programa Competitivitat de Catalunya 2007-2013) and by the Ministerio de Economa y
Competitividad-INNPACTO, Project REDOX 2015 (IPT-2011-1690920000), -CONSOLIDER Ingenio 2010, Project MULTICAT
(CSD2009-00050) and NANO-EN ESTO Project MAT2010-21510.
The research was supported by EIT and KIC-InnoEnergy under
the Project KIC-EES (33_2011_IP29_Electric Energy Storage).
References
Table 2
Cycling performances on the VFB single-cell using dPAN (500, 24) electrodes.
Cycle index
CE (%)
VE (%)
EE (%)
1st
210th
1020th
2030th
98.99
99.14
98.67
98.78
85.02
85.06
85.11
85.60
84.16
84.33
83.98
84.56
[1] Barton JP, Ineld DG. Energy storage and its use with intermittent renewable
energy. IEEE Trans Energy Convers 2004;19:4418.
[2] Lund H. Large-scale integration of wind power into different energy systems.
Energy 2005;30:240212.
[3] Landgrebe AR, Donley SW. Battery storage in residential applications of energy
from photovoltaic sources. Appl Energy 1983;15:12737.
[4] Xiong F, Zhou D, Xie Z, Chen Y. A study of the Ce3+/Ce4+ redox couple in
sulfamic acid for redox battery application. Appl Energy 2012;99:2916.
[5] Shah R, Mithulananthan N, Bansal RC. Damping performance analysis of
battery energy storage system, ultracapacitor and shunt capacitor with largescale photovoltaic plants. Appl Energy 2012;36:23544.
[6] Waag W, Kbitz S, Sauer DU. Experimental investigation of the lithium-ion
battery impedance characteristic at various conditions and aging states and its
inuence on the application. Appl Energy 2013;102:88597.
[7] Kim SU, Monroe CW. Increasing the rate capability of batteries with electrolyte
ow. Appl Energy 2013;103:20711.
[8] Kear G, Shah AA, Walsh FC. Development of the all-vanadium redox ow
battery for energy storage: a review of technological, nancial and policy
aspects. Int J Energy Res 2011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.
[9] Leung P, Li X, Ponce de Leon C, Berlouis L, John Low CT. Progress in redox ow
batteries, remaining challenges and their applications in energy storage. RSC
Adv 2012;2:1012556.
[10] Skyllas-Kazacos M, Chakrabarti MH, Hajimolana SA, Mjalli FS, Saleem M.
Progress in ow battery research and development. J Electrochem Soc
2011;158:R5579.
[11] Skyllas-Kazacos M, Grossmith F. Efcient vanadium redox ow cell. J
Electrochem Soc 1987;134:29503.
[12] Skyllas-Kazacos M, Kazacos G, Poon G, Verseema H. Recent advances with
UNSW vanadium-based redox ow batteries. Int J Energy Res 2012;34:1829.
[13] You D, Zhang H, Chen J. A simple model for the vanadium redox battery.
Electrochim Acta 2009;54:682736.
[14] Jia C, Liu J, Yan Ch. A signicantly improved membrane for vanadium redox
ow battery. J Power Sources 2010;195:43803.
[15] Zhao P, Zhang H, Zhou H, Chen J, Gao S, Yi B. Characteristics and performance
of 10 kW class all-vanadium redox-ow battery stack. J Power Sources
2006;162:141620.
[16] Joerissen L, Garche J, Fabjan Ch, Tomazic G. Possible use of vanadium redoxow batteries for energy storage in small grids and stand-alone photovoltaic
systems. J Power Sources 2004;127:98104.
[17] Han P, Yue Y, Liu Z, Xu W, Zhang L, Xu H, et al. Graphene oxide nanosheets/
multi-walled carbon nanotubes hybrid as an excellent electrocatalytic
material towards VO2 =VO
redox couples for vanadium redox ow
2
batteries. Energy Environ Sci 2011;4:47107.
[18] Li W, Liu J, Yan Ch. Multi-walled carbon nanotubes used as an electrode
reaction catalyst for VO2 =VO
2 for a vanadium redox ow battery. Carbon
2011;49:346370.
[19] Sun B, Skyllas-Kazacos M. Modication of graphite electrode materials for
vanadium redox ow battery applicationI. Thermal treatment. Electrochim
Acta 1992;37:125360.
351
[32] Niquirilo RV, Teixeira-Neto E, Buzzo GS, Suffredini HB. Formic acid oxidation at
Pd, Pt and PbOx-based catalysts and calculation of their approximate
electrochemical active areas. Int J Electrochem Sci 2012;5:34454.
[33] Lin R, Haung P, Sgalini J, Largeot C, Taberna PL, Chmiola J, et al. Solvent effect
on the ion adsorption from ionic liquid electrolyte into sub-nanometer carbon
pores. Electrochim Acta 2009;54:702532.
[34] Oriji G, Katayama Y, Miura T. Investigations on V(IV)/V(V) and V(II)/V(III)
redox reactions by various electrochemical methods. J Power Sources
2005;139:3214.
[35] Dua V, Surwade SP, Ammu S, Agnihotra SR, Jain S, Roberts KE, et al. All-organic
vapor sensor using inkjet-printed reduced graphene oxide. Angew Chem Int Ed
2010;49:2154.
[36] Anderson AB, Neshev NM, Sidik RA, Shiller P. Mechanism for the
electrooxidation of water to OH and O bonded to platinum: quantum
chemical theory. Electrochim Acta 2002;47:29993008.
[37] Page T, Johnson R, Hormes J, Noding S, Rambabu B. Study of methanol electrooxidation reactions in carbon membrane electrodes and structural properties
of Pt alloy electro-catalysts by EXAFS. J Electroanal Chem 2000;485:3441.
[38] Xiong L, Manthiram A. Effect of atomic ordering on the catalytic activity of
carbon supported PtM (M = Fe, Co., Ni, and Cu) alloys for oxygen reduction in
PEMFCs. J Electrochem Soc 2005;152:A697703.
[39] Gattrell M, Park J, MacDougall B, Apte J, McCarthy S, Wu CW. Study of the
mechanism of the V(IV)/V(V) redox reaction in acidic solutions. J Electrochem
Soc 2004;151:A12330.
[40] Kim KJ, Kim YJ, Kim JH, Park MS. The effects of surface modication on carbon
felt electrodes for use in vanadium redox ow batteries. Mater Chem Phys
2011;131:54753.
[41] Yao C, Zhang H, Liu T, Li X, Liu Z. Carbon paper coated with supported tungsten
trioxide as novel electrode for all-vanadium ow battery. J Power Sources
2012;218:45561.
[42] Yue L, Li W, Sun F, Zhao L, Xing L. Highly hydroxylated carbon bres as
electrode materials of all-vanadium redox ow battery. Carbon
2010;48:307990.