Professional Documents
Culture Documents
System
Chief of Police
Lieutenant
Chesterfield
Campus
15 FT Police
Officers
5 PT Police
Officers
USB:\Happy Valley.doc
Lieutenant
Clayton
Campus
Lieutenant
St. Peters
Campus
Lieutenant
Bridgeton
Campus
15 FT Police
Officers
15 FT Police
Officers
15 FT Police
Officers
5 PT Police
Officers
5 PT Police
Officers
5 PT Police
Officers
During a recent accounting audit it was noted that salary expenditures within the System
Police Department were tracking significantly unfavorable to budget. The CFO brought this
finding to the Chief to find out what was occurring. The Chief in turn communicated the
situation to his lieutenants who in turn were instructed to review duty rosters against payroll
timekeeping entries to validate time paid for time worked. Lieutenants were given 5 business
days to report their findings.
Time reporting for payroll purposes for police officers at HVHS is a two-part process.
The payroll also runs bi-weekly. Officers must complete a manual Time and Attendance (TA)
exception form in hard copy to their respective lieutenants for approval. Officers concurrently
enter their exceptions electronically into the HVHS payroll system via the HRIS portal. The
electronic entries into the portal are what actually generates the paychecks. As the process is an
exception process, it is presumed that the normal workweek consists of 40 hours. Only
exceptions are notated via the TA and entered electronically. The following is a list of exceptions
that officers are to report both via the TA and when making electronic entries:
Holiday
Overtime
Sick Leave
Personal Leave with Pay
Personal Leave without Pay
Bereavement
2nd Shift Differential
Overtime on 2nd Shift Differential
3rd Shift Differential
Overtime on 3rd Shift Differential
Shift Change
Schedule Change
Doc Pay
Upon receipt of the lieutenants reports, the Chief noted that all reports indicated that all
time TA reports correlated accurately with duty assignments. The Chief requested a report from
the payroll department of the entries that were made electronically to compare against the
lieutenants information and found numerous inconsistencies between what was submitted via
the manual hard-copy TAs and what was entered electronically resulting in significant
overpayments (and in some cases underpayments) to officers. Over the course of the prior fiscal
year the unfavorable variance amounted to close to $150,000 and some officers were owed in
total $25,000.
USB:\Happy Valley.doc