Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Former Chairman, Council of Higher Secondary Education, Odisha & Retd. Principal,
B. J. B. Autonomous College, Bhubaneswar, India
ABSTRACT
The effect of Hall current on unsteady couette flow of a visco-elastic incompressible and electrically
conducting fluid with heat and mass transfer incorporation with heat source, chemical reaction and Soret effect has
been analysed. The effects of magnetic parameter Pm, Hall parameter m, suction parameter R and elastic parameter Rc
graphs through computer analysis. The skin friction, rates of heat transfer at the two boundary of flow have been
discussed with the help of tables. It is observed that the flow field and temperature field are greatly influenced by the
Hall currents including other fluid parameters.
KEYWORDS: Unsteady MHD Coutte Flow, Hall Current, Visco-Elastic Fluids, Chemical and Soret Effect
Original Article
on the flow field and temperature field for visco-elastic fluids of Pr=5.0, 9.0 and 16.0 have been studied with the help of
Received: Nov 07, 2015; Accepted: Dec 08, 2015; Published: Dec 12, 2015; Paper Id.: IJPRDEC201507
INTRODUCTION
The study of MHD couette flow of compressible and incompressible fluids has been an important subject
for many researchers for a pretty long time. Pai1 has already studied the problem of unsteady couette flow of an
incompressible viscous fluid between two plates when one of the plates is given a sudden impulse. Nanda2 has
studied the problem on flow formation in couette motion through a porous channel with suction or injection while
Katagiri and Mahuri3 have independently analysed the same flow with magnetic field imposed upon it. Mahuri4
later extended the problem of couette flow through porous walls with one wall moving with constant acceleration
and with constant suction at the walls.
Lehnert5 has considered MHD couette flow of an incompressible fluid between two walls moving
relative to each other. The heat transfer problem in case of unsteady couette flow between two parallel walls
maintained at different temperature is studied by Rath et al6. Mishra7 extended the problem studied by Dutta8
and Kaloni9 by analyzing plane couette flow of an Oldroyd liquid with equal rates of injection at the lower wall
and suction at the upper wall with the imposition of a uniform transverse magnetic field. Bhatanagar10 has
discussed the plane couette flow of Rivlin-Ericksen higher order fluid with constant suction at the stationary plate.
The plane couette flow of walters B liquid with equal rate of injection at one wall and suction at the other
moving wall has be studied by Soundalgekar11. Moreover, Mishra and Mohapatra12 have investigated the problem
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
50
of flow of formation in couette motion between two walls taking a Riener-Rivlin fluid subjected to magnetic field.
Agarwal13 has studied generalized couette flow of an incompressible fluid in hydromagnetics. Chang and Yen14 have
discussed MHD couette flow with wall conductance. Mishra15 has studied the pressure induced flow of an elastic-viscous
electrically conducting incompressible fluid between two relatively moving plane porous walls in the presence of a
transverse magnetic field. The commencement of unsteady couette flow of a second order fluid has been analysed by
Padhy16. The same flow has been studied by Dash and Biswal17 by taking Oldroyd liquid through a porous channel in the
presence of heat sources. Soundalgekar and Haldavnker18 have considered MHD couette flow between conducting walls
with heat transfer. Jana and Datta19 have considered the effect of Hall current on unsteady couette flow, when the velocity
of the moving plate varies as tn. Haller20 has investigated on the effect of Hall current on unsteady couette flow for a MHD
a.c or d.c generator. Dash and Dash21 have studied the MHD flow through porous medium past a stretched vertical
permeable surface in the presence of heat sources/sinks and chemical reaction. Singh and Garge22 have analysed the
oscillatory heat and mass transfer mixed convective flow in a rotating channel with heat source/sink and Soret effect.
As the study of both Newtonian and non-Newtonian couette flow problems in the presence of a magnetic field is
very important from technological point of view, the literature on it is replete with copious investigation on MHD couette
flows.
In the present problem, Hall effect on unsteady couette flow of a visco elastic fluid with heat and mass transfer
including heat sources, chemical reaction and Soret effect has been analysed. Here, heat and mass transfer effects on the
non-Newtonian flow with Hall current have been investigated under the following physical conditions:
acceleration.
y'
x ' -axis be chosen along the lower wall and y' -axis be normal to it. The lower and upper walls are specified
Y ' =0 and Y ' =L respectively. It is also supposed that the two walls have infinite extensions on either
sides of the x-axis. An uniform magnetic field of strength B0 is applied transverse to x ' -axis along y' -axis. The suction
by the equations
velocity
v' at the
walls is considered to be constant. It is assumed that the magnetic field lines are normal to the free
stream velocity of the fluid and the magnetic permeability is uniform throughout the field. The plates may be assumed nonconducting. Further, as the plates have infinite extension, all the variables except pressure are functions of y only.
represents the secondary flow velocity along
z'
w'
z' -
direction that induces a cross-field in that direction. Hence flow becomes three dimensional.
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
u', w'
and
v'
51
v'
= v = constant
2.1
Following the stress-strain rate relation given by the stress components are given by
x 'y '
x 'y '
u '
= 2k 0
y'
(2.2)
2u' 2u'
u '
= 0
k 0 v 2 +
y'
y' t '
y'
(2.3)
and pxy = 0
where k0 = 0 (1-2), the volume co-efficient of elasticity of the fluid. As the motion of fluid is due to shearing
action of the fluid layers, then
p'
=0
y'
(2.5)
Thus, the equation of motion and energy including viscous dissipation and heat sources for the viscoelastic fluid
model of Oldroyds B liquid are given below.
The equations of motion are
u '
u ' 0 2 u ' k 0 3 u '
3 u ' B 2 0 u '+ mw '
+v
=
+ v 3
t '
y' y' 2 y' 2 t '
y'
t ' 1 + m 2
and
(2.6)
w '
w ' 0 2 w ' k 0 3 w '
3 w ' B 2 0 mu ' w '
+v
=
2
+v
t '
y'
y' 2
y' t '
y'3
t ' 1 + m 2
(2.7)
'
'
k 2 ' 0
+v
=
+
t '
y' C p y' 2 C p
u '
k 0 2 u ' u '
u ' 2 u '
+ s' (' L )
+v
y' y' 2
y' C p y' t ' y'
(2.8)
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
52
C' C'
2 C'
2 '
+
= D 2 + * + D1 2
t ' y'
y'
y'
(2.9)
where, is the density of fluid, Cp is the specific heat at constant pressure, 0 is the co-efficient of viscosity of the
fluid, k0 the volume co-efficient of elasticity of the fluid, s is the electrical conductivity of the fluid, D is the diffusion coefficient, k is the co-efficient of thermal conductivity of the fluid, B0 is the constant magnetic field applied transverse to the
plate,
s'
is a source-sink related dimensional constant, L and CL are the temperature and concentration of the fluid at the
C'
are the temperature and concentration of the fluid at any point (x,y),* is the chemical reaction
u' =0, ' =0, c' =0, for all y, u' =Atn, w' =0,
'
c'
= 0,
=0
y'
y'
for
(2.10)
y'
t'
u'
w'
,t = ,u =
,w =
n
T
AT
AT n
v1T
y=
V T
v
R=
Pr =
S=
v1c p
Rc =
E=
1 2
T
A 2 T 2n
cp L
Pm =
B 2 0
Sc =
v1
, the schmidt number,
D
4s' v1
v2
v1 =
' L
L
C=
C'C L
CL
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
S1 =
D1 L
v1C L
K=
V
v1 T
53
, soret number,
with the help of above non-dimensional parameters, the equation 2.6, 2.7. 2.8 and 2.9 are now reduced to their
dimensionless forms as follows:
u
u 2 u
3u
3u
w
Pm u
+R
2 + Rc 2 + RRc 3 +
+m
=0
2
t
y y
y t
y 1 + m t
t
(3.1)
w
w 2 w
3w
3w
Pm u w
+R
2 + Rc 2 + RRc 3
m
=0
t
y y
y t
y
1 + m 2 t t
(3.2)
2 u u u 2 u
u 1
1 2
E R 2S = 0
+R
+ R c E R 2 . + .
2
t
y Pr y
y y y yt
y 4
and
(3.3)
C
C 1 2 C
2
+R
S
+ RKC = 0
1
t
y Sc y 2
y 2
(3.4)
C
= 0,
=0
y
y
for
y = 0 and u = 0, w = 0, = 0, C = 0 for y = 1.
F
F 2 F
3F
3F
Pm
+R
2 + Rc 2 + RRc 3 +
(1 im ) F = 0
2
t
y y
y t
y 1 + m
t
(4.1)
The above equation is a third order differential equation that requires three boundary conditions for its solution.
But the present problem provides only two boundary conditions. To remove this difficulty, we follow small perturbation
technique given by Beard and walter to obtain the approximate solution of the given equation, Accordingly, F is expanded
in the powers of Rc
for Rc << 1,
F = R c2 F1 , i = 0,1,2,3.....
(4.2)
i =0
www.tjprc.org
R 0c
and
R 1c
R c2 , R 3c
editor@tjprc.org
54
F0
F 2 F Pm(1 im ) F0
+ R 0 20 +
=0
t
y y
1+ m2
t
(4.3)
F1 3 F0 2 F1 3 F0 Pm (1 im ) F1
F1
+ R
3 2 + 2 +
=0
t
y t
1+ m2
t
y y y
(4.4)
In order to solve equations 4.3, 4.4, 3.3, 3.4 by Galerkin technique subject to the boundary conditions 3.5, we
choose the following approximate infinite expressions for F0, F1, and C as
F0 t n ( 1 - y ) + a 1 t y ( 1 - y ) + a 2 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y ) 2 + a 3 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y ) 3 +
(4.5)
F1 b 1 t y ( 1 - y ) + b 2 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y ) 2 + b 3 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y ) 3 + ..
(4.6)
c 1 t ( 1 - y 2 ) + c 2 t 2 y ( 1 - y 2 ) 2 + c 3 t 3 y 2 ( 1 - y 2 ) 3 + ..
(4.7)
and C D 1 t ( 1 - y 2 ) + D 2 t 2 y ( 1 - y 2 ) 2 + D 3 t 3 y 2 ( 1 - y 2 ) 3 + ..
(4.8)
where aj, bj, cj and Dj (j=1,2,3..) are arbitrary constants to be determined later.
Solution of Zeroth Order Equation (4.3)
Substituting eq. 4.5 in eqn. 4.3, the defect function DF0 is determined as
DF0 = -Rtn + ntn-1 (1-y)
Pm
1
+
1 + m 2 (1 im )
Pm
+ a 1 2t + Rt (1 2 y ) + y(1 y ){1 +
(1 im)}
2
1+ m
Pm
+ 2a 2 Rt 2 ( y + 2 y 3 3y 2 ) t 2 (1 + 6 y 2 6 y) + ty 2 (1 y) 2 1 +
(1 im )
2
1+ m
Pm
(1 im)}]
1+ m2
(4.9)
The defect function DF0 is then minimized by Galerkin technique of orthogonalisation leading to the following
three double integrals.
1
DF t y
j
(1 y) j dt dy = 0 where j = 1,2,3
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
55
After performing the above integration we obtain the following three algebraic equations involving the parametric
constants aj, j = 1,2,3 as
A1a1 + A2a2 + A3a3 = d1
B 1a 1 + B 2a 2 + B 3a 3 = d 2
and C1a1 + C2a2 + C3a3 = d3
(4.10)
The three linear equations in 4.10 are solved by Cramers rule to give a1, a2, a3
Substituting values of a1, a2 and a3 in eqn. 4.5, we can get
F0 t n ( 1 - y ) + a 1 t y ( 1 - y ) + a 2 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y ) 2 + a 3 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y ) 3 + ..
(4.11)
F1 3 F0 2 F1 3 F0
F1
F
Pm
+ R
+ 3 2 + 2 +
(1 im ) 1 = 0
2
t
y y
y t 1 + m
t
t
(4.12)
and F1 b 1 t y ( 1 - y ) + b 2 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y ) 2 + b 3 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y ) 3 + ..
Substituting F0 and F1 in eqn. 4.12, we get the defect function DF1 as
DF1 = -2 a 1 +4 a 2 t{ Rt ( 6 y- 3 ) +( 6 y 2 -6 y+1 ) }
+6 a 3 t 2 { R t( 1 -1 2 y+3 0 y 2 +2 0 y 3 ) +( 3 y+1 8 y 2 +3 0 y 2 - 1 5 y 4 ) }
+b 1 [ y( 1 - y) + R t( 1 -2 y) +2 t +
Pm
1+ m2
( 1 -i m) y( 1 - y) ]
Pm
+ 2b 2 ty 2 (1 y) 2 + Rt 2 ( y 3y 2 + 2 y 3 ) t 2 (1 6 y + 6 y 2 ) +
(1 im) ty 2 (1 y) 2
2
1+ m
+ 3b 3 [t 2 y 3 (1 y) 3 + Rt 3 ( y 2 4 y 3 + 5y 4 2 y 5 ) t 3 (2 y 12 y 2 + 20 y 3 10 y 4 )]
Pm
(1 im) t 2 y 3 (1 y) 3
2
1+ m
(4.13)
The defect function DF1 is minimized by Galerkin technique of orthogonilisation resulting the following three
double integrals stated as
1
DF
0
t j t y (1 y) j dt dy = 0 where j = 1,2,3
Performing the above integrations, we obtain the following three algebraic equations involving the constants bjs,
j=1,2,3 as
A 1 b 1 + A 2 b 2 + A 3 b 3 =d 1
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
56
B 1 b 1 +B 2 b 2 +B 3 b 3 =d 2
and C 1 b 1 + C 2 b 2 + C 3 b 3 =d 3
(4.15)
The three linear equations (4.15) are solved by Cramers rule to get the value of b1, b2 and b3.
Substituting b1,b2 and b3 in eqn. (4.6), we obtain,
F1 b 1 t( 1 - y) +b 2 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y) 2 +b 3 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y) 3 +..
(4.16)
Consequently, F = F0 + RcF1
F=t n ( 1 - y) +( a 1 + R c b 1 ) t y ( 1 - y) +( a 2 + R c +b 2 ) t 2 y 2 +( 1 - y) 2 +( a 3 + R c b 3 ) t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y) 3
(4.17)
d 1' , d '2 , d 3' , we obtain 24 constants from P39 to P62 and substituting these constants in the expressions for b1, b2 and b3,
we obtain their values as b1 = p37 + ip68, b2 = p71 + ip72 and b3 = p75 + ip76
Substituting the values of a1, a2, a3, b1, b2 and b3 in eqn. 4.17 we obtain
F = u + iw
=t n ( 1 - y) +( p 2 9 + Rcp 6 7 ) t y( 1 - y) +( p 3 3 + Rcp 7 1 ) t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y) 2
+( p 3 7 + Rcp 7 5 ) t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y) 3 + i [ ( p 3 0 + R cp 6 8 ) t y( 1 - y) +( p 3 4 +R cp 7 2 ) t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y) 2
+( p 3 8 + Rcp 7 6 ) t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y) 3 ]
(4.18)
(4.19)
[where p 7 7 =p 2 9 +R cp 6 7 ,p 7 8 =p 3 3 +R cp 7 1 , a nd p 7 9 =p 3 7 +R cp 7 5 ]
and w( y) =p 8 0 t y( 1 - y) +p 8 1 t 2 y 2 ( 1 - y) 2 +p 8 2 t 3 y 3 ( 1 - y) 3
(4.20)
where, p 8 0 =p 3 0 + R c p 6 8 ,p 8 1 = p 3 4 + R c p 7 2 a nd p 8 2 =p 3 8 + R c p 7 3
Equations (4.19) and (4.20) represent the expressions for velocity of the fluid along the horizontal plates and
along the direction transverse to the plates respectively with boundary conditions.
for t = 0, u = w = 0 for all y
for t > 0, u = tn, w = 0 for y = 0
u = 0, w = 0 for y = 1
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
57
2
1
D = c1 1 y 2 2Rty + t R 2 st (1 y 2 )
pr
4
4
+ c 2 2 ty (1 y 2 ) 2 + Rt 2 (1 6 y 2 + 5 y 4 ) + t 2 (3y 5 y 2 )
Pr
2 3
1
t (1 18 y 2 + 45 y 4 28 y 6 ) R 2St 3 y 2 (1 y 2 ) 3
Pr
4
+ ER c nt 2 n 1 Et 2 n ER c t n p 77 (n + 1)(1 2 y)
+ 2E n +1{RR c p 77 R c p 78 (n + 2)(y 3y 2 + 2 y 3 ) + p 77 (1 2 y)}
+ Et n + 2 {4p 78 ( y 3y 2 + 2 y 3 ) 3R c p 79 (n + 3)( y 2 4 y 3 + 5y 4 2 y 5 )
2RRcP78 (1 6 y + 6 y 2 )} + Et n +3{6p 79 ( y 2 4 y 3 + 5y 4 2 y 5 )
2
6RRcP79 ( y 6 y 2 + 10y 3 5y 4 )} + ERctp77
(1 2 y) 2
2
2
+ Et 2 {6Rcp77 p 78 ( y 5y 2 + 8y 3 4 y 4 ) 2RRcp77
(1 2 y) p 77
(1 4 y + 4 y 2 )}
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
58
(4.21)
The defect function is minimized by Galerkin technique of orthogonalisation resulting the following three double
integrals as
1
Dt y
j
j1
Performing the above integration, we obtain the following three parametric equations involving constants cjs,
j=1,2,3 as
(4.22)
The set of three linear equations in (4.22) are solved by Cramers rule to obtain the constants c1, c2 and c3. Now,
with the values of c1, c2 and c3 the expression for temperature becomes.
( y) = c1 t (1 y 2 ) + c 2 t 2 y(1 y 2 ) 2 + c 3 t 3 y 2 (1 y 2 ) 3
(4.23)
2
DC = D1 1 y 2 2Rty + t + RKt (1 y 2 )
Sc
4
+ D 2 2 ty(1 y 2 ) 2 + Rt 2 (1 6 y 2 + 5 y 3 ) + t 2 (3y 5 y 3 ) RKt 2 y(1 y 2 ) 2
Sc
+ D 3 {3t 2 y 2 (1 y 2 ) 3 + 2Rt 3 ( y 6 y 3 + 9 y 5 4 y 7 )
2 3
t (1 18 y 2 + 45 y 4 28 y 6 ) + RKt 3 y 2 (1 y 2 ) 3
Sc
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
59
The defect function DC is then minimized by Galerkin technique of orthogonalisation leading to the following
three double integrals
1
DCt
0
y j1 (1 y 2 ) j dt dy = 0 ,
where, j = 1,2,3. Performing the above integration, we obtain the following three parametric equations with the
constants Djs,j = 1,2,3, as
(4.24)
C( y) = D1 t (1 y 2 ) + D 2 t 2 y(1 y 2 ) 2 + D 3 y 2 t 3 (1 y 2 ) 3
(4.25)
2u 2u
u
xy =
R c R 2 +
y
y t
y
(4.26)
The skin-friction at the lower and the upper plates are determined as
0 = xy
y =0
= t n + p 77 t + R c (2Rp 77 t 2Rp 78 t 2 + nt n 1 p 77 )
and
1 = xy
(4.27)
y =1
= t n p 77 t + R c (2R p 77 t 2Rp 78 t 2 + nt n 1 + p 77 )
(4.28)
The rate of heat transfer at the lower and the upper plates are respectively
Nu 0 =
and
Nu1 =
y =0
= C 2 t 2
y =1
= 2C1 t
(4.29)
(4.30)
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
60
CG0 =
and
C
y
y =0
C G1 =
= D 2 t 2
C
y
y =1
(4.31)
= 2D1 t
(4.32)
The constants involved in the above equations are omitted here in order to save space.
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
61
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org
62
Figure 5: Concentration (C) Profile for Pr = 9.0, Rc = 0.05, S = 0.1, Pm = 0.3, n = 0.5, t = 0.05, E = 0.01
Shear Stresses
The values of shear stresses (skin frictions) for different values of R, Rc and m are entered into table 1, keeping all
other related parameters fixed. It is observed that with the rise of R, skin friction increases at both the plates for both
viscous (Rc=0) and viscoelastic fluids (Rc>0) with exception that it decreases at the upper plate for viscous (or Newtonian)
fluids (Rc=0) only. Further, it is marked that skin friction increases with R at both the plates for both types of fluids with
the rise of Hall current except at the upper plate for Newtonian fluid (Rc=0) where it reduces with the rise of Hall current.
Table 1: Effects of R, Rc and m on Skin Friction for n=0.5, t=0.05, S=0.5, Pr=5.0, Pm=0.3, E=0.02
M
0.5
1.0
1.5
Rc
R
5.0
10.0
15.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
5.0
10.0
15.0
0.00
0
-0.1065
0.0269
0.1603
-0.1039
0.0309
0.1658
-0.1023
0.0336
0.1694
0.05
1
-0.3408
-0.4741
-0.6075
-0.3433
-0.4781
-0.6130
-0.3449
-0.4808
-0.6166
0
-0.0556
0.1287
0.4409
-0.0541
0.1336
0.4512
-0.0534
0.1355
0.4551
0.10
1
-0.0556
0.1287
0.4409
-0.0541
0.1336
0.4512
-0.0534
0.1355
0.4551
0
-0.0076
0.2141
0.6810
-0.0068
0.2216
0.7001
-0.0074
0.2216
0.7014
1
0.2232
0.7076
1.4372
0.2291
0.7233
1.4677
0.2317
0.7284
1.4758
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
63
Table 2: Effects of t, n, R and Rc on Skin Friction for m=0.5, S=0.5, Pr=5.0, Pm=0.3, E=0.02
R
0.5
0.05
5.0
0.10
10.0
0.05
0.5
n
Rc
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0
-0.2265
-0.1119
0.0026
-0.0819
-0.0122
0.0424
0.0269
0.1287
0.2141
1.0
1
-0.2207
-0.1119
-0.0031
-0.5505
-0.2447
0.0424
-0.4741
0.1287
0.7076
0
-0.0619
-0.0006
0.0606
0.0640
0.1079
0.1419
0.1363
0.1793
0.2108
1
-0.0381
-0.0006
0.0373
-0.2640
-0.0550
0.1419
-0.2363
0.1793
0.5782
Similarly, from Table 2 which records the effects of R, Rc, n and t on skin friction it is concluded that as t
increases, skin friction rises with R and Rc at both the boundary of flow. On increasing n from 0.5 to 1.0 it is noticed that
skin friction also increases with R and Rc at both the plates.
Rate of Heat Transfer
Table 3 exhibits the dependence of rates of heat transfer (or Nusselt Numbers) on R, Rc, n and t, keeping other
related parameters fixed. It is revealed that as t increases, rate of heat transfer decreases at both the plate for both viscous
(Rc=0) and visco-elastic (Rc>0) fluids for both t=0.05 and n=1.0. Further, it is noticed that the rise in n results in increase of
rate of heat transfer at the lower plate for both Rc=0 and Rc>0 and reduction of rates at the upper plate for both Rc=0 and
Rc>0 with exception for higher value of Rc. It is also observed that the rates of heat transfer first decreases then increases at
the two plates for both types of fluids. All the above conclusions drawn are in the presence of a uniform external magnetic
field and Hall current.
Table 3: Effects of t, n, R and Rc on the Rates of Heat Transfer
(Nusselt Number) m = 0.5, S=0.2, Pr=5.0, Pm=0.3, E=0.001
n
R
0.5
0.5
0.05
5.0
0.10
10.0
0.05
5.0
0.10
10.0
0.05
Rc
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
0.00
0.05
0.10
1.0
Nu0
Nu1
Nu0
Nu1
-1.127E-06
-1.645E-06
-2.435E-06
-4.508E-06
-6.579E-06
-9.739E-06
-6.539E-07
-2.736E-06
-7.246E-06
-2.616E-06
-1.094E-05
-2.898E-05
-2.637E-06
-1.113E-05
-2.448E-05
-4.538E-05
-3.407E-05
-1.814E-05
-9.075E-05
-6.814E-05
-3.627E-05
3.637E-05
5.163E-05
1.244E-04
7.274E-05
1.033E-04
2.488E-04
3.454E-05
3.827E-05
6.741E-05
2.190E-07
-4.679E-07
-1.742E-06
8.762E-07
-1.872E-06
-6.969E-06
-2.298E-07
-7.004E-07
-2.581E-06
-9.193E-07
-2.801E-06
-1.032E-05
-1.256E-06
-4.615E-06
-1.106E-05
-5.619E-05
-4.162E-05
-1.697E-05
-1.124E-04
-8.323E-05
-3.393E-05
3.053E-05
1.700E-05
3.570E-05
6.106E-05
3.400E-05
7.141E-05
2.409E-05
1.060E-05
1.250E-05
Table 4: Effects of Sc on the Concentration Gradient CG0 & CG1 for R = 5.0, K = 0.5,
S1 = 1.0, Rc=0.05, t=0.05, n=0.5, m=0.5, S=0.1, Pr=5.0, Pm=0.3, E=0.001
Sc
2.0
www.tjprc.org
CG0
3.864E-06
CG1
-8.404E-05
editor@tjprc.org
64
25.0
425.0
Table 4: Contd.,
9.288E-06
-1.044E-04
9.979E-06
-1.043E-04
Concentration Gradient
And finally it is observed that the concentration gradient reduces with height of the fluid in the channel for a given
rate of mass transfer. But as Schmidt number (rate of mass transfer) is increased the concentration gradient sharply
increases with marginal increase for high value of Sc. This revelation has been recorded in the Table 4.
CONCLUSIONS
This paper investigates the effect of heat and mass transfer on MHD couette flow of compressible and
incompressible fluids with heat and mass transfer including heat sources, chemical reaction and Soret effect. The effect of
Hall current on unsteady couette flow of a visco-elastic incompressible and electrically conducting fluid with heat and
mass transfer incorporation with heat source, chemical reaction and Soret effect has been analysed. As the study, Hall
effect on unsteady couette flow of a visco elastic fluid with heat and mass transfer including heat sources, chemical
reaction and Soret effect has been analyzed.
REFERENCES
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Rath, R. S, Nayak, S. K., Mohapatra, B. S., Acta Cinencia. India, I, 36, 1974.
7.
Mishra, S. P., Proc. Nat, Inst. Sci, India, 431, 327-334, 1965a.
8.
9.
Hall Effect on Unsteady Couette Flow of a Visco-Elastic Fluid with Heat and
Mass Transfer Including Heat Sources, Chemical Reaction and Soret Effect
65
www.tjprc.org
editor@tjprc.org