Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1 of 7
Home
Important Clause(s)
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
About Me / Contact Me
CHAT
Menu / Categories
Thoughtful Thoughts
Reviews + news
Informative + Studies
For FUN
Hey People!
PC Games
Video Conversion/Encoding
PC Softwares
Bluestacks Related
How To-s
All How to-s
PC How to-s
Android How to-s
Online How to-s
Subtitling
Only for Rooted Phones
Watch Online
Android
All Android Related
THE CONCEPT
Least Count is a very important concept, introduced to properly measure the reading from
a measuring tool, like Vernier Calipers, Travelling Microscope, Ruler OR a meter, like car's
speedometer, ammeter, voltmeter, etc.. So it's a concept that'll help you not only in
your theoretical life, but also Practically, in your everyday life. Learning and
understanding it is utter.
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
2 of 7
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
I've seen many people confused about how to find Least Count. The method used by them
might be slightly different, tough to remember, so even if they understand it once, the next
time they try to do the same, they forget about it, which is not good.
The way I like to make it understandable is related to the definition of Least
Count itself. Remember, Least Count gives you the minimum value that can be
measured by by the instrument/device/tool. So considering that, Least Count will
be:
You can take any number of divisions for finding Least Count, but those have to be the
smallest ones. Let us take "n" small divisions.
Value measured in "n" divisions
LC=
n
Necessary Note
Many Images given on
"merryquest.blogspot.com" (this website)
may be from freedigitalphotos.net,
commons.wikimedia.org &
openclipart.org.
and some others may be not from above
websites.
Don't worry if you don't understand the above mentioned theory completely.
We'll use the same concept here to find the least count of Ruler, Vernier Calipers &
Travelling Microscope, although things might change a little in case of Vernier
Calipers & Travelling Microscope. I recommend to go through the examples
below to understand properly.
Also we'll talk a little about the importance or Physical significance of Least
Count, in case of a Ruler.
Most Popular
Topics/Posts
THE RULER
Efficient way-Add
Notification/Welcome
Message on Blogger Blog
Logarithms &
antilogarithms + How to
find Logs & antilogs using
Log Table
{Best Way} Run Google
Play Store on Bluestacks
(Android Market) Android
App Player for PC
Download & Install Candy
Crush Saga on Bluestacks
for PC
So for a ruler, that is, the scale, we use in daily life, we can find the Least Count, by the
definition formula only, which we did.
Let us take 20 divisions for it (the value of "n". We know that a ruler measures 20 mm or 2
cm, 20 divisions.
Topics/Posts by
Month
2015 (2)
2014 (150)
December (19)
November (1)
October (3)
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
3 of 7
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
September (4)
August (10)
June (22)
While calculating, we used 20 divisions. Now 10, 20, 30, 40, etc. are numbers that can be
easily dealt with practically, rather than numbers like 13, 17, 27, etc.
July (24)
May (8)
What if you wanna calculate the value measured by 23 divisions of a ruler? Here Least
Count becomes handy. You can simply multiply 23 with 0.1 cm (the Least Count) & get the
answer 2.3 cm.
Therefore, 2.3 cm is the value measured by 23 divisions of a Ruler.
In case of ruler, there was only 1 scale which gave us the readings, so we straight away could
use Unitary method on that. But in Vernier Calipers, there are 2 scales, called "The Main
Scale" & "The Vernier Scale". The Main Scale is similar to the Ruler we use, therefore "Main
Scale" does the work of providing the results upto the first Decimal Place. (in centimetres)
January (24)
2013 (203)
2012 (8)
Vernier Scale does the magic (near magical!) of providing us with the next
Decimal Place, which imparts more Accuracy to the Vernier Calipers. Consider
the Ruler, take the smallest division in it 0.1 cm. Now if we draw 10 more smaller divisions
in that, theoretically those will give the second decimal Place.
But is that feasible practically? Of-course not! 0.1 cm (1 mm) is already very small and
putting 10 more lines in that would be outrageous. So to do that, Vernier Scale is used.
"Vernier Scale" can be considered as the magnified form of those small 10 lines that we
were to draw in 0.1 cm of ruler.
So, the above should explain the concept of Vernier Calipers to you. Let's come back to find
the Least Count of Vernier Calipers.
In addition to simply finding the minimum value (Least Count) given by Main Scale (ruler),
we have to consider the Vernier Scale too (the magnified version of the smaller lines that we
were to draw in the 0.1 cm of Ruler). What we'll do is first find the Least Count of the Main
Scale and then move onto the Vernier Scale to solve our issue step by step.
The Main Scale (same as Ruler) will give the smallest Reading or Least Count of 0.1 cm, as
in case of the Ruler. Next, the formula would be the same:
Value measured in "n" divisions
LC=
n
where "n" are the SMALLEST DIVISIONS. Now I want you to imagine Vernier Scale
as the smaller lines in 0.1 cm of the Ruler (Main Scale). What would you consider
"n" to be? The smallest lines we've imagined, OR the smaller lines of an actual Ruler
(without Vernier Scale). Of-course the first choice is correct. Since "n" are the SMALLEST
DIVISIONS, we have to take up the imagined lines, which are drawn in the 0.1 cm gap.
10 are drawn in 0.1 cm gap, 20 in 0.2 cm gap & 30 in 0.3 cm gap. These give the
corresponding values of "n" and values measured by n.
So you can take any of them. If you're writing in Exam I'll always recommend you
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
4 of 7
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
to take up the first one in the series, so the Examiner doesn't get confused. So
considering this, we'll take the first one:
n = 10 &
Value measured in 10 (smallest divisions, n) = 0.1 cm.
Correspondingly, The Least Count:
Value measured in 10 divisions (smallest)
LC=
10
0.1 cm
=
10
which turns out to be 0.01 cm. Voila! it's the Least Count of Vernier Calipers. As a special
case, the Least Count of a general Vernier Calipers (done above) is also called
Vernier Constant.
I hope you got this! This Imagining concept will help you understand the Least Count a lot.
It'll help you better know other devices also.
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
formula:
Value measured in "n" divisions
LC=
n
Remember, Vernier Scale gives the smallest divisions "n", not the Main Scale. So Imagine
the smaller 0.1 cm of the Main Scale being divided into 50 more divisions, such that 0.1 cm
gap makes 50 smallest divisions, 0.2 cm makes 100, 0.3 cm gap makes 150, .... So:
Value measured in 50 divisions (smallest)
LC=
50
0.1 cm
=
50
which is 0.002 cm or 0.02 mm, the Least Count of the Vernier Calipers shown.
Just think a little, 0.001 cm would mean 10 micrometres. That's such a high value of
precision to be achieved practically.
Anyways, The Travelling Microscope works the same way as The Vernier Calipers. There is
a Main Scale & then a Vernier Scale. The difference is just in the "n" (the number of
smallest divisions considered) and the Value given by those n divisions.
The Imagining concept has to be utilized here too. The Main Scale Divisions are little
different than Ruler. The 1 cm is divided into 20 divisions, instead of 10 (in case of a Ruler).
Therefore in the Main Scale only 1 cm gap means 20 divisions, 2 cm means 40 divisions, 3
cm means 60 divisions. Therefore, considering the Main Scale only, by unitary method:
1 Main Scale Division = 1 cm OR 2 cm OR 3 cm OR .....
20
40
60
5 of 7
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
6 of 7
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
The question is the same. What value of "n" to choose. The smallest divisions are the ones
given by Vernier Scale.
Imagine them now. There are 50 smallest divisions in 0.05 cm gap, 100 (50 more) in 0.10
cm gap, 150 in 0.15 cm gap, ..... so on.
These are the things we needed. "n" can be takes as 50, 100 or 150 with the corresponding
Value it tells. So:
Value measured in 50 divisions (smallest)
LC=
50
0.05 cm
=
50
which gives the answer 0.001 cm, the Least Count of Travelling Microscope.
That's it!
That's how you find Least Count of a Measuring Tool/device/Instrument, which'll help you
take up any Reading from it.
Note: As a disclaimer, I have to tell you that this is a thesis. Please don't
be over-reliant on this article, about the exact information.
But this has been operated many-a-times and it works, so we should be good.
I hope you liked the above post. Comment with your reviews, even a "Thank
you" will be enough for me to know that I was able to help you.
You can ask your questions or to contact me, I can also be contacted by the
"Contact Me" option on the website.
Also feel free to share the post using its link (URL).
ENJOY!!!
You might also like:
Difference between
+1 & Share on
Google +
Logarithms &
antilogarithms +
How to find Logs &
Tutorial to
Download & Add
Subtitles to Movie
1/20/2016 6:22 PM
Best way to find the Least Count of a Measuring tool - Quest for fun
7 of 7
...
http://merryquest.blogspot.in/2014/05/best-way-to-find-least-count-of.html
or Episode
Linkwithin
Please Ask your question/Give your opinion, here, I love to read User Comments.
TO GET FUTURE COMMENTS USING EMAIL, LOGIN WITH YOUR GOOGLE ACCOUNT (on a
Website like google.com) & while signed in, CLICK "Notify me" checkbox, that appears now, below
the commenting box.
3 comments:
Unknown 1 December 2015 at 23:26
Well, Its been an year, I guess, and still no one has commented anything. Oh well, Here's a
start- Pretty detailed and easily-explained post, my friend. Thank you for it! Even more so
because tomorrow is my exam. So yes, you know I'm saying it from the bottom of my scared
little heart- Thank you.
Reply
Comment as:
Publish
Newer Post
Notify me
Home
Older Post
1/20/2016 6:22 PM