Professional Documents
Culture Documents
w
ap
eP
e
tr
.X
w
om
.c
s
er
June 2003
MARK SCHEME
MAXIMUM MARK: 100
Page 1
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
1
Section 1: Presentation
The presentation will be marked out of 20 marks: Content/Presentation 10;
Pronunciation/Intonation 5; Language 5.
Candidates who make no reference to the contemporary society or cultural heritage
of a country where the language is spoken will have their mark for content/
presentation halved.
Content/Presentation
Knowledge of facts; ability
to express opinions and
raise issues for discussion.
9/10
Full and well organised
coverage of the topic; ideas
and opinions included as
well as factual points; lively
presentation; examiners
interest sustained.
7/8
Good exposition and sound
organisation of the topic;
makes relevant factual
points though may be less
good in ideas and opinions;
presentation somewhat
stilted though keeps
examiners interest.
5/6
Adequate exposition of the
topic; few ideas or
opinions; evidence of
preparation but
presentation pedestrian.
3/4
Material thin; rambling,
repetitious; hardly any
ideas or opinions; in
danger of losing the
examiners interest.
0/1/2
Very little factual
information; material
irrelevant; vague,
arguments incoherent; little
effort at presentation.
Pronunciation/Intonation
Language
5
Outstanding pronunciation
and intonation; an
occasional slight mistake
or hesitation. Not
necessarily a native
speaker.
5
Has a very good feeling
for the language; speaks
fluently and accurately;
shows good use of
relevant idiom and uses a
wide range of structures
and vocabulary.
4
Speaks fairly fluently and
accurately; uses idiom
with a reasonable range
of structures and
vocabulary.
4
Good pronunciation,
makes a fair attempt at
correct intonation and
expression; some mistakes
and/or hesitation.
3
A fair degree of accuracy
in pronunciation; quite a
number of errors; some
attempt at intonation and
expression.
2
Intelligible but shows
marked influence of mother
tongue and very many
errors of pronunciation.
0/1
Very poor; many gross
errors; frequently
incomprehensible.
3
May speak with hesitation;
adequate range of
structures and vocabulary;
no ambiguity of meaning.
2
Marked hesitation; limited
range of structures and
vocabulary; leading to
some ambiguity of
meaning.
0/1
Very marked hesitation;
severe limitations of
structures and vocabulary;
thought processes
basically influenced by
mother tongue.
Page 2
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
1
Accuracy
0-2 Poor
No grasp of grammatical
accuracy. Errors constant
and repeated.
3-4 Weak
Has scant feeling for the
foreign idiom. Generally
translates literally from the
mother tongue.
0-2 Poor
Has no feeling for the foreign
language.
Page 3
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
1
* In the case of candidates who do not ask any questions by the end of the Topic
Conversation, Examiners must prompt by asking Do you have any questions to ask
of me? in the appropriate language. The same prompt should be used at the end of
the General Conversation. Candidates will not be penalised for being prompted in
this way.
June 2003
MARK SCHEME
MAXIMUM MARK: 70
Page 1
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
2
Erster Teil
Aufgabe 1
(a)
Streit
(b)
kologischer
(c)
jetzt
(d)
steigend
(e)
Ergebnis
1
[Total: 5]
Aufgabe 2
Words in square brackets are those already given on the question paper.
(a)
(b)
[Mehr Licht und mehr Platz fr Schweine werden] den Bauern von der
Landesregierung vorgeschrieben.
[Die Bauern klagen darber, dass] die Kosten durch mehr Tierschutz
steigen.
(d)
(e)
[Man isst] ebenso viel Rindfleisch, wie vor BSE und MKS
(c)
[Total: 5]
Aufgabe 3
Note on the marking of Exercises 3 and 4: candidates must not copy whole clauses or
sentences from the text. They must take some change (however slight in wording or
construction) to the text, otherwise the copied text is circled, the word TEXT is placed
in the margin next to it and no mark is awarded for that point.
(a)
(b)
Welche Art von Produkten von den Verbrauchern favorisiert werden wird.
(c)
Page 2
(d)
(e)
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
2
Very Good
Consistently accurate. Only very few errors of minor significance. Accurate use of
more complex structures (verb forms, tenses, prepositions, word order)
Good
Higher incidence of error than above, but clearly has sound grasp of the
grammatical elements in spite of lapses. Some capacity to use accurately more
complex structures.
Sound
Fair level of accuracy. Common tenses and regular verbs mostly correctly
formed. Some problems in forming correct agreement of adjectives. Difficulty with
irregular verbs, use of prepositions.
Below average
Persistent errors in tense and verb forms. Prepositions often incorrect. Recurrent
errors in agreement of adjectives.
0-1 Poor
Little or no evidence of grammatical awareness. Most constructions incomplete
or incorrect. Consistent and repeated error.
For Questions 3 and 4, the marks for the quality of language will be awarded globally
for the whole performance on the set of answers to a text. With regard to length, a
concise answer containing all mark-bearing components for content is scored on the
full range of marks for language, i.e. length does not determine the quality of language
mark. An answer scoring 0 for Content cannot score any language marks, and the total
available on the whole set of answers will therefore be affected. The final total for
language will be reduced on the following scale:
Answer(s) worth 2 or 3 scoring 0: reduce final assessment by 1;
Answer(s) worth 4or 5 scoring 0: reduce final assessment by 2;
Answer(s) worth 6 or 7 scoring 0: reduce final assessment by 3;
Answer(s) worth 8 or 9 scoring 0: reduce final assessment by 4;
Note: A minimum of 1 mark for quality of language should be awarded if there are any
content marks at all (i.e. 0 language marks only if 0 content marks).
University of Cambridge Local Examinations Syndicate 2003
Page 3
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
2
Zweiter Teil
Aufgabe 4
(a)
(b)
(c)
(d)
(e)
[15]
Accuracy of language: see grid with Question 3
[5]
[Total: 15 + 5 = 20]
Page 4
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
2
Aufgabe 5
Content
One mark for any correct and relevant point made from either text, provided
the point is not made by copying a section of text and that both texts are
referred to.
Opinions and Response to the text (for Question 5)
[10]
[5]
Mark like a mini-essay according to the variety and interest of the opinions and
views expressed, the response to the original text stimulus, and the ability to
express a personal point of view.
5
Very Good
Varied and interesting ideas, showing an element of flair and imagination, a
capacity to express a personal point of view.
Good
Not the flair and imagination of the best candidates, but work still shows an
ability to express a range of ideas, maintain interest and respond to the issues
raised.
Sound
A fair level of interest and ideas. May concentrate on a single issue, but there is
still a response to ideas in the text.
Below average
Limited range of ideas; rather humdrum. May disregard the element of response
to the text, and write a largely unrelated free-composition.
Poor
Few ideas to offer on the theme. Banal and pedestrian. No element of personal
response to the text.
[5]
[Total: 10 + 5 + 5 = 20]
June 2003
MARK SCHEME
MAXIMUM MARK: 40
Page 1
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8683, 9717
Paper
3
16-20 Good
Generally sound grasp of
grammar in spite of quite a few
lapses; reads reasonably; some
attempt at varied vocabulary.
11-13 Good
Sound knowledge and generally
relevant; some ability to develop
argument and draw conclusions.
10-15 Adequate
A tendency to be simple, clumsy
or laboured; some degree of
accuracy; inappropriate use of
idiom.
7-10
Adequate
Some knowledge, but not always
relevant; a more limited capacity
to argue.
5-9
Poor
Consistently simple or pedestrian
sentence patterns with persistent
errors; limited vocabulary.
3-6
Poor
Some attempt at argument, tends
to be sketchy or unspecific; little
attempt to structure an argument;
major misunderstanding of
question.
1-4
Very poor
Only the simplest sentence
patterns, little evidence of
grammatical awareness, very
limited vocabulary.
1-2
Very poor
Vague and general, ideas
presented at random.
June 2003
MARK SCHEME
MAXIMUM MARK: 75
Page 1
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8671, 9717
Paper
4
Candidates will write their answers in the foreign language. Examiners will look for a
candidates ability to communicate effectively and will ignore linguistic errors that do
not impede communication.
Passage based questions: examiners should consider the extent to which candidates
have been able to identify the significant issues raised in the passage and, where
appropriate, have applied these to the text as a whole. The passage is a stimulus
passage, to be used as a springboard to give candidates a starting point for their
answer. Examiners should allow candidates to use the passage as they choose, and
ask themselves how successfully the candidates have manipulated their material and
to what extent they have shown depth of awareness and knowledge of the workings
of the text under discussion. This is not an exercise in literary criticism: examiners
should reward candidates whose answers show good understanding of how a text
works and how an author has conveyed the key issues.
Essay questions: a prime consideration is that candidates show detailed knowledge
and understanding of the text.
Page 2
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8671, 9717
Paper
4
Candidates are expected to write 500-600 words for each of their answers.
Candidates who write more than 600 words cannot be placed higher than the 16-17
category in the marking scheme.
Marks
Description
22+
20-21
18-19
16-17
14-15
12-13
10-11
Page 3
Mark Scheme
A/AS LEVEL EXAMINATIONS JUNE 2003
Syllabus
8671, 9717
Paper
4
6-9
0-5