CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 I

Regulatory
Service I Facility , Site j

Source of Perchlorate (Operalions,
Equipment, Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I .I Number of Range Ctf
Number of Samples Concentrations
Detections Collected Detected (ppb)
I
Interest (Cleanup
[reqUested,
Analytlca Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure pennilting
Method requirements,
, Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
IE3CX;~~ (otential pathway under residential

Navy I IVVhite Oak SUlface
Marine Corps Warfare Center
146GrOUndwaterliResearch, Development, Test and
23 Evaluation
1Groundwater
I 3
I I 8 ND·- 9.3 EPA reuse scenario if residents access Federal; State
groundwater for potable use
I BRAC
Potential pathway under residential

Navy I IVVhite Oak Surface t6Groundwaterl IResearctl, Development, Test and E300.0; EPA
Marine Corps Warfare Center 23D Evaluation
Groundwater 3 5 ND· - 14.1
314
reuse scenario if residents access 'Federal; State I BRAC
groundwater for potable use.
Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Researctl, Development. Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None 'Federal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 24 Evaluation

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Researcll, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 12.4-15.4 E300;0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
groundwater for potabte use.

Navy I \VVhite Oak Surface 146Groundwater1 IResearctl, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 65.2 - 67.5 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
groundwater for polable use.
Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Researctl. Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development. Test and
Groundwater 1 2 ND-11.1 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC
Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Testand


Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research. Development, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 9 16 ND· - 12.~ reuse scenario if residents access 'Federal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 30 Evaluation 314
groundwater for potable use
Navy I IVVhite Oak Surface

I46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and
31 Evaluation
Groundwater 3 15 ND·-5.1
A Potential pathway under residential
E300.0; EP reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; Slate I BRAC
314 groundwater for potableuse.
Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Groundwater 0 1 ND E300.0 None , IFederal; State I BRAC

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and E300.0; EPA
Groundwater 5 15 ND· - 15.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 33 Evaluation 314
Navy I 'I~ite Oak Surface

1~6Groundwater1. reSearch, Development, Test and
34 . Evaluation I I I I I
Groundwater 10 16 ND· - 14.0
314
E300.0; EPA reuse scenario if residents. access j Federal; Slate
I BRAC
File; PercData_A1ISvcs_ApriI2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 51 of 73
Regulatory
Service I Facility I Site I

Source of Perchlorate (Operations,
location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
Number of
Detections
Number of Range of
Samples Concentrations
Collected Detected (ppb)
A I . I
Method
Interest (Cleanup
lrequested,
na y!lca Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
reqUirements)
Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface

46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Test and
35 Evaluation
I
Groundwater
I 0
I 12
I ND I E~N
E300,0;
314 one teral; State I BRAC
Navy! VIAllte Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, DeVelopment, Test and

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center OOD Evaluation
Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center OOS Evaluation

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I ND I E300.0 INone )Federal; State I BRAC

Marine Corps Warfare Center 01S Evaluation
Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development, Tesl and

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I ND ) E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC


Groundwater 1 2 ND-9.3 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC


Groundwater 0 2 ND E300.0 None IFederal; Stale I BRAC


Navy! IVIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 9.9-10.1 E3000 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
0

Marine Corps Warfare Cenler 08 Evaluation

Navy! VIAlile Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and
Groundwater 2 2 9.8-10.8 E300.0 reuse scenario if residents access IFederal; State I BRAC
groundwalerfor potable use.
Navy! sl~ite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Developmenl, Tesl and

File; PercData_A1ISvcs_April 2217_

Shee!: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 52 of 73
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I
Number of
Detections
Number of Range of
A I . I
Method
j
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested.
na ytlca Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure pennilting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center 13M Evaluation
Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None Federal; State I BRAC


Groundwater 0 2 NO E300.0 None IFederal; State I BRAC

Evaluation
IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 14S

IGroundwater I 0 I 2 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and




Evaluation
Groundwater 2 2 25.4 - 35.4 E300.0 reuse scenario if reSidents access IFederat; Slate I BRAC
Marine Corps Warfare Center 19
groundwater for potabte use.

Navy ! White Oak Surface Research, Development. Test and

46SP206
Evaluation
I Groundwater I 0 I 2 I ND I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! White Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps Warfare Center Water015 Evaluation
(Surface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC
Navy! V\l1ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

ISurface Water I 1 I 2 I ND-7.2 J E300.0 INo potential pathways known jFederal; State I BRAC

ISurface Water I 0 I 1 I NO I E300.0 INone IFederal; State I BRAC

\Surface Water I 1 \ 1 I 7.6 I E300.0 INo potential pathways known IFederal; State I BRAC
File: PercData_AlISvcs_April2217_
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate (Operations.
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Number of Number of Range
Detections Samples ConcentratIons
~f Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
rqu:st .
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure pe~'ltmg
ed
requirements,
( Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Water204 Evaluation
NO None Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Tes1 and
ISurface Water I 1 I 1 I 8.5 I E300.0 I No potential pathways known (Federal; State I BRAC
Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and
Marine Corps warfare Center Water207 Evaluation
(Surface Water ( 1 ( 1 I 7.3 I E300.0 ( No potential pathways known (Federal; State I BRAC
Army Perchlorate Survey - EnvIronmental Restoration - Cleanup. Other

,
Building 528
Future permit
Ammunition
EPA314 requirements for I
Army fFort Vvlngate Depot Activity INormal Munition Demil soil 29 31 nd - 3.18 ppm Soil Ingestion BRAC
modified sampijng and
Maintenance
cleanup
Buildin9
Future permit
FoonerTNT
soil 1 11 nd - 0.10 ppm
EPA314
Soil Ingestion
requirements for I
Army IFort Vvlngate Depot Activity IWashout Munition Demil BRAC
modified sampling and
Facilities
~
Future pennit
Fonner TNT
requirements for I
Army IFort Vvlngate Depot Activity IWashout Munition Demil Groundwater 12 47 nd" -76.6ppb EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion
sampling and
BRAC
Facilities
cleanup
Fonner TNT Future permit
I .. ,Washoul requirements for I
Anny Fort Vvlngate Depot ActiVIty Facilities and Munition Demil Groundwater 2 2 2,440 - 2,890 EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Building 528
Fonner TNT . cleanup
Future permit
washout
requirements for I
Army IFort Vvlngate Depot Activity JFacilities and Munition Demil Groundwater 2 17 nd" - 9.4 ppb EPA 314.0 Water Ingestion BRAC
sampling and
Buildings 542 !
cleanup
600
Former TNT
Future permit
Washout
requirements for I
Anny IFort Vvlngate Depot Activity IFacilities and Munition Demil Groundwater 0 16 nd" - 10.0 ppb 314 Water Ingestion
sampling and
BRAC
Adminstration
cleanup
Area
Former TNT
Washout Future pennit
.. Facilities and requirements for I
Army IFort Vvlngate Depot ActiVIty 'Northem Munition Demil Groundwater 0 8 nd 314 none
sampling and
BRAC
Property cleanup
Boundary
Future pennit
Sewage
reqUirements for I
Anny IFort Vvlngate Depot Activity ITreatment Munition Demil Groundwater 0 2 nd 314 none
sampling and
BRAC
Facility
deanup
File; PercData_NISvcs_April 2217_

Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, 01!ler • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 54 of 73
:!i\';!i! !.:il: ;· ·.J; ·._i·. 7:;·. .: :!,. .·,!ix··' '. <x 'iiT '!:, ':ii>! .- .! .),i
"Wi'H' . §'*! !HH Vi":. . i .···· ii' .fT:',>" 'i, ·'.i::'. '7 . •. : .. I!! '. )iii:! !':flY;:;l;:·!!!;:;:;';:!i"f!':;:,· .:;,:! . :; ·.Xi.?!!i!··
Regulatory'
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations Potential Palhway(s) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
Equipment, Activities) Detections Method
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUirements,
sampling
requirements)
Future permit
OB/ODArea· requirements lor
Army Fort IMngate Depot Activity Munition Demit Groundwater t 14 nd'· 10.0 ppb 314 Water Ingestion BRAC
dosed sampling and
cleanup
Future permit
OB/OO Area· requirements for
Army Fort \/Vingate Depot Activity Munition Demil Groundwater 14 39 nd' -15.0 ppb 314 Water Ingestion BRAC
current sampling and
cleanup
SVAD--0O9--R·Ot
314,0/1.0
Army Savanna Army Depot Old Burning Open bum/open detonation Groundwater 1 11 4.7 pptl Dlinking Water BRAC
uglL
Grounds
SVAD·050 •
314,011.0
Army Savanna Army Depot Active Open bum/open detonation Groundwater 7 9 1.2 -12.0' Drinking Water BRAC
uglL
Demoli_tion Area
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/ 4ppb None BRAC
Ammunition Plant (SFMP) WaterMU 21 Action Permit

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
Ammunition Plant (SFMP) WaterMU21 Action -Permit

Army Non.e Groundwale. 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None BRAC
Ammunition Plant (SFMP) WaterMU27 Action Permit

Ammunmon Plant (SFMP) WalerMU 27 Action Permil
Surrflower Army Surface RCRA Correclive

Army None Groun dwaler 0 3 NO E314.0I4ppb None BRAC
Surrflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Ammunition Plant (SFMP) WaierMU39 Actiofl Permit


Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314.0/4ppb None I BRAC

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314,0/4ppb None BRAC

Army None Groundwater 0 1 NO E314,O/4ppb None BRAC
Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Permit
Sunflowe.- Army Surface RCRA Corrective

,p Paae 550173
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
~f Analytical reqUested,
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
Interest (Cleanup
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective I

Army None ND BRAC
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39 Action Permit
Army
Sunflower Army Surface
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 39 INone
\
Groundwater
I 0
I
3
I ND IE314.0/4pPbINone
JRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU39
INane I Surface Water I 0
I
3
I NO I
E314.0/4PPb INone
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU47 I None
I
Groundwater
\ 0
I 1
I ND I
E314.0/4PPb!None
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66
INane
I Groundwater
I 0
I
1
I
ND jE314.0/4PPb!None
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU 66
INane
I Groundwater
I
0
I
1
I ND IE314.0/4PPb\None
1RCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 INone
I Groundwater
I 0
I 1
I ND IE314.0/4PPb INone
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
1Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 INane
I
Groundwater
I 0
I
1
I
ND IE314.0/4PPb\None
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
IAmmunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 INone
I Groundwater
I 0
I 1
I ND IE314.0/ 4ppbINone
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66
(None I Groundwater
I 0
I 1
I ND I E314.0/ 4PPb INone
1RCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 INane
I Sediment
I 0
I 5
I ND I E314.0/4PPb INone
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Army
'Ammunition Plant (SFAAP) WaterMU66 INane I Surface Water I 0
I 4
I ND I E314.0/4PPb INone
IRCRA Corrective I
Action Permit
BRAC
Ammuniton
EPA 314/5.0
Army 'Umatilla Chemical Depot Demolition Area OB/OD 5-9.6 ppb ppb No Completed Pathway IUnknown I BRAC
(ADA)
The Sewage oullall is ultimately

flowing to the Wright Patman Lake
Army IRed River Army Depot

IX-1 S PI ,Sanitary sewer treated from RRAD and
ewer ant Lone Star AAP I Groundwater
I 1
I 31
I
6.B ppb
I r
nearby. which is one of two sources
f drinking water for Texarl<ana and jlnvesti ation
EPA 314.0 the surrounding commumUes. In
March, 2003, the State and
. 9b S
reqUIred y tate
J BRAC
installation sampled the lake area,

and its sediments and found no
detection.
I I I I I I I I
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb __~age_~_oU3
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate (Operations.
Location
Detected
(Medial
I I I I I .
Number of Number of
Detections Samples
Collected
Range ~f Analytical rqUested,

ConcentratIons
Method Potenllal Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
Detected (ppbl
requirements,
Interest (Cleanup
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
IX-l Sewer Plant ,Sanitary sewer treated from RRAD and Investigation
Army IRed River A1my Depot Lone Star AAP
Surface Water a 5
ND
EPA 314.0 none
reqUired by State
I BRAC
IX-l Sewer Plant Sanitary sewer treated from RRAD and Investigation
Army IRed River Army Depot
I Lone Star AAP
Sediment a 5
ND
EPA 314.0 none
required by State
I BRAC
lEast Bum No.2,

Army lPueblo Chemical Depot ISurface
Used for destroying obsolete, unserviceable
Groundwater a 1
ND
EPA 314.0 none
RCRA Corrective I BRAC
or excess conventional munitions. Action
WaterMU5
This area was used for indneration of

Complete pathway from exitlo
Army IPueblo Chemical Depot

North Bum Area munitions, chemical and hazardous wastes.
INo. 1, Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater 1 2
NO' - 9.3 ugll
=
E314.0, RL Chico Creek aquifer and into the
2.5 uglL Arkansas alluvial aquifer-where
I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMU6 ignited. Pershing missile rocket motor
residences utilize groundwater.
static Mngs were conducted here.
This area was used for incineration of

North Bum Area munitions, chemical and hazardous wastes.
I
INo.2. Surface Propellants were placed in large pans and Groundwater
I I
0/2
1
Not Detected IE314.0,RL

2.5 ugll none
=1 I
RCRA Corrective
Action
I BRAC
WaterMU7 ignited. Pershing missile rocket motor
static firings were conducted here.
TNT Washout
E314.0, RL Complete pathway from exit to
A1my IPueblo Chemical Depot

Fadlily and Ammunition wornshop area. Energetics
IDischarge were reclaimed from munitions. Pink water Groundwater 1 21 NO' -180 ugll
varies
between 4.0
Chico Creek aquifer and into the
Mansas alluvial aquifer wltere

I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
System, Surface discharged to unlined lagoon.
and 8.0 ugll. residences utilize groundwater.
WaterMU 17
E314.0, RL

East Lagoon,
ISurface
Served as the waste lagoon for collection of
all industrial area wastes to indude the Groundwater a 3 NO varies
between 100 none
I I
RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WalerMU 21 Missile Facility Building.
and 200 ugll
Pits South of the

Guided Missile Demolition area potentially used for
IWorflShop, destroying bombs by detonating them in IGroundwater
I
a
I
1
I
ND I
E314.0, RL =1
4.0 uglL none
IRCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
Surface pits.
WaterMU42
700 Series

Buildings,
!Surface
IAmmUnitiOn renovation and maintenance
buildings.
IGroundwater
I a I 1
I NO IE314.0, RL =\
20 ugll none
\RCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
WaterMUs 53,
55 and 57
Concentrated

Red Fuming
NilricAcid
IDisposal Area, I Uncertain IGroundwater
I I I 0 1 NO IE314 0, RL =\
20 ugll none
IRCRA Corrective I
Action
BRAC
Surface
r .WaterMU20
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_ApriI2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other ' Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 57 of73
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Detections Samples Concentrations
~f Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reqU~sted'
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure p~'tting
reqUIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I I
Sampling
Army
Jefferson Proving Ground Operational
I<operational Range
sampling)
Ranges - Impact 0 ti
and boundary
areas
pera ons
I I I SL 36 160 1.027 - .11 mglkg
I EPA 314 INO known pathways I~""'''''
Environmental
Center as part 01 I ER,A(BRAC)
the Range
Assessment
Program
Sampling
Army I<Operational Range

sampling)
I I
and boundary
areas
pera ons I Surface Water I 1
I I 22 0.87 ppb'
I EPA314 INa known pathways I~-"" I
Environmental
Center as part 01
ER,A(BRAC)
the Range
Assessment
Program
I
Jefferson Proving Ground Operational I I
Sampling
I~""'''·· I
I I I I I
Army I(Operational Range Ranges - Impact 0 ti EPA 314 Environmental
and boundary pera ons sediment 0 22 NO No known pathways ER,A (BRAG)
sampling) modified Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Program
I I ,=-".'
Sampling
Army
\(Operational Range
sampling)
and boundary
areas
pera ons
I I Groundwater 0
I 14
I NO
I
EPA 314
I
modified No known pathways
Environmental
Center as part 01
the Range
I ER,A(BRAC)
Assessment
Program
I
Sampling
Armv I
sampling)
IOperational
Ft Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact 0

and boundary
areas
ti
pera ons
I I I I ISL 0 97 NA
EPA 314
modified
INa known pathways
,=-""
Enviro!1mental
Center as part 01
the Range
Assessment
Program
I
OMA
Iva,,,y'" •
Fl Polk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact EPA 314 conducted by the
Operations Surface water 0 17 NA No known pathways
lsampling) and boundary modified Army OMt
Armv
Armv
I~tPolk (Operational Range Ranges - Impact 0 Ii
.
Isampling) and boundary
peraons Sediment 0 17 NA
EPA 314
modified
No known pathways
Iva",y"""
conducted by the
Army
OMA
File: PercData_AIISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

Page 56 0173
Regulatory

location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I .
Number of Numberof Range ~f
Deteclions-' Samples ConcentratIons
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested,
Method Potential Pathway(s) ofExposure pe~itlin9
requIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
I
Sampling
conducted by the
sampling)
Operational
Ft Bliss (Operational Range/RangeS - Impact 0
and boundary
areas
f
pera Ions
I SL
I
0
I 259
I NA
I I EPA 314
modified No known pathways
IArmY
Environmental
Center as part of
the Range
I OMA
Assessment
Army I I J I I I j I I IProgram
Sampling
I 1=""""·'
I I I I I I
Operational
Ft Btiss (Operational RangelRanges - Impact 0 ti EPA 314 Environmental I
sampling) and boundary pera ons Sediment 0 29 N No known pathways OMA
modified Center as part of
areas the Range
Assessment
Army I I J I I I I I J I
Program
---
I
Sampfing
sampling)
Operational
Ft Bliss (Operational RangelRangeS - Impact 0 f
and boundary
areas
pera Ions I, Groundwater
I 0
1
8
I I NO
EPA 314
modified
INO known pathways 1=-""
Environmental
Center as part of
the Range
Assessment
I OMA
Army I I Program
,CPBO-001-R-01 Sampling and

Army ICamp Bonneville Oem01/lF4
OB/OD Groundwater 6 24 5-214 ugll 314 modified Potential drinking water I BRAC
Cleanup
---
Sampling
Army IFort Ord (BRAG) ISite 39 • Multi·

Range Area
I
Range Operations - use of perchlorate
containing munitions for training purposes.
I soil
I 41
I 432
1 13-106 ~gi\(g
I EPA 314/20-1
2060 IJg/l(g No known palhway
I
requirements
(suspected
contaminant in
I BRAC
range areas due
to historical use).
Sampling
Army IFort Ord (BRAG) J36A

Site 39 • Range I' .
Conducting OB/OD operations.
I soil
I 0
I 10
I
No detections. I EPA 314/51-1
61 IJg/l(g none
reqUirements by
California EPA fori BRAC
RCRA clean
closure of site.
longhorn Army (ite 29 Former

Army TNT Production Operations Regulalory
IAmmunition Plant 1-88000 ppb' Groundwater incomplete I BRAC
Area request
Site 29 Former
longhorn Army 300.0 & Regulatory
Army TNT Production Operations Soil 13 56 24-2410 ppb No known pathway I BRAC
'Ammunition Plant· 314.0/40 request
Area
Army I~onghom Army Site 35 Sumps

Operations
300.0 & Regulatory
Ammunition Plant (Various)
Groundwater 54 190 1-82900 ppb' Groundwater incomplete I BRAC
314.0/4 request
File: PercData_AlISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page_59_ot73
Regulatory

Source of Perchlorate (Operalions,
EqUipment. Activities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Detections Samples Concentrahons
~f Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
requ~sted'
Method Potenbal Pathway(s) of Exposure pe~ltling
reqUirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Army
Longhom Army
IAmmunition Plant
I Site 35 Sumps
(Various)
I Operations
I Soil
I 17
I 106
I 20-1450 ppb
I 300.0 &
314.0/40
I
No known pathway
I
Regulatory
request
I BRAC
I Site 50 Former I I
Army
Longhorn Army
IAmmunition Plant w aste Disposal Operations
Facility I Groundwater
I 15
I 34
I 2-150000 ppb'
I 300.0&
314.0/4
Groundwater incomplete
IRegulatOry
request
I BRAC
-
Army
Longhorn Army
IAmmunition Plant
Site 50 Former
lwaste Disposal Operations
Facility
Soil 6 14 1~5600ppb
300.0&
314.0/40
I
No known pathway
IRegUlatOry
request
I BRAC
Longhorn Army 300.0& RegUlatory

Army
IAmmunition Plant
Perimeter Wells Operations Surface water 0 6 NO
314.0/4,40
none
request
I BRAC
Site 35,
!LonghOrn Army Regulatory
Army
IAmmunition Plant Gooseberry Operations Surface water 44 110 1-59 ppb 300.0/4 Surface water to Caddo Lake
requesl
I BRAC
Creek
Longhorn Army ISite 18-24, Regulalory

Army
'Ammunition Plant Harrision Bayou
Operations Surface Water 22 105 6-905 ppb 300.0/4 Surface Water to Caddo Lake
request
I BRAC
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas.
Indudes parcels:
Analyses
730-X, 870-X,
performed at the
910-X, 1140-X, EPA Method
request of
1150. 1160-X, 314.0; Soil
Possible contamination from weapons firing regUlatory
Army
IFort McClellan, Calhoun \1170-X, 1350
and impacts during historicallraining Surface Soil 2 182 10 & 32 ppb'
MRL- 40 to
possible ingestion agencies (EPA I BRAC
County, Alabama X, 1380-X, 1390 68 ppb and
activities. and ADEM)
X, 1400-X, 1410 sediment 90
during site
X,1420-X, ppb
investigation
1510,181(7),
phase.
194(7),2000,
2010, 2210-X,
2280, 2290-X,
2310, 2320-X.
File: PercData_AlISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Melhod 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 60 of 73
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup

Location
Detected
1 I I
~f I I .
Analytical I
requested.
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure pe~illing I Funding Type
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) reqUIrements,
sampling
requirements)
~
Various firing
I I I I I I I
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
730-X, 870-X, Analyses
910-X, 1140-X, performed at the
EPA Method
1150, 1160-X, request of
314.0; Soil
Possible contamination from weapons firing regulatory
Army
IFort McClellan, Calhoun 11170'X, 1350
and impacts during historical training Subsurface soil 0 162
MRL - 40 to
County, Alabama NO none agencies (EPA I BRAC
X, 1380-X, 1390 68 ppb and
activities. and AOEM)
X, 1400·X, 1410 sediment 90
X,1420-X, during site
ppb
1510,181(7), investigation
194(7),2000, phase.
2010, 2210-X,
2280, 2290-X,
2310, 2320-X.
-
Various firing
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
730-X, 870-X, Analyses
910-X, 1140-X, performed at the
1150, 1160-X, request of
Army
IFort McClellan, Calhoun !1170-X, 1350 Possible contamination from weapons firing
and impacts during historical training Groundwater
EPA 314.0 regulatory
County, Alabama 4 38 1.2 - 2.55 ppb' (MRL - 5- 4 Possible water ingestion agencies (EPA I BRAC
X, 1380-X, 1390
activities. ppb) and AOEM)
X, 1400-X, 1410
X,1420-X, during site
1510,181(7), investigation
194(7),2000, phase.
2010, 2210-X.
2280, 2290-X,
2310, 2320-X.
File: PercData_A1ISvcs_April 2217_
Sheel:·Env Restoration·Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 61 of 73
Regulatory
Service I Facility j Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
~f Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
/,equested.
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Various firing
I I I I I I I I
ranges and
impact areas.
Includes parcels:
73Q-X. 67Q-X, Analyses
91Q-X.114Q-X. performed al tlle
115Q.116Q-X. request of
Possible contamination from weapons firing EPA 314.0 regulatory
,Fort McClellan. Calhoun !117Q-X.135Q
Army and impacts during historical training Surface Waler 1 41 2.66 ppb' (MRL- 5- 4 Possible waler ingestion
County. Alabama X, 1360-X, 1390 agencies (EPA I BRAC
activities. ppb) and ADEM)
X, 1400-X, 141C
X,142Q-X. during site
1510.161(7), investigation
194(7).2ooQ, phase.
2010. 2210-X,
2260. 229Q-X.
2310. 232Q-X.
., IRVAAP-16 Fuze Initial sampling of

1Ravenna Army Ammunotlon d B EPA 314.0 Dermal - Training by National Guard perchlorates at I
Army Plant an ooster OB/OD of Military Munrtions Surface Water 2 10 7 and 25 ppb
MRL 1 ppb (Incidental Exposure) BRAC
Quarry Ponds RVAAP reuested
by Ohio EPA
-
Army ,Ravenna Army AmmunilionlRVAAP-44 Load

Plant Line 11
I
'1i LAP F Tty
Muno ons aCI I I
Groundwater
I 0
I 10
I ND
I EPA 314.0
MRL4ppb
none
Initial sampling Of
perchlorates at I
RVAAP reuesled
BRAC
by Ohio EPA
Army !Fort Huachuca 1westlSouthlEastlOBJOD

Range
I I I soil 67 242 I
127,000 ppb (max) EPA 314.0
None known - besides soil
ingestion. inhalation
State developing
an action level
IMNSurface
WaterRO
State using
Caney Lake as
Army IRed River Army Depot I OBOD IOpen Bum and detonation activities I Groundwater I 0 1 196 1 ND 1314.0/ MRL 41
15ppb
none
I
Emergency Feed
water for other
takes. State has
I IMN Surface
WaterRO
sampled with the
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
File: PercOata_A1I$vcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

Page 62 of73
Regulatory
Service 1 Facility I Site I

Source of Perchlo13te (Operations,
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Number of Number of Range ~f
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested.
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure pennilling
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
-
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army IRed River Army Depot I 00 \Open detonation activity I Stormwater I 26 I 26 I 417 ppb max I
Discharge to public drinking water Iwater for oll1er
I
EPA 314.0 source-Several miles to Caney lakes. State has
Lake sampled will1lhe
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
take.
Army IRed River Army Depot I OB 1&2 IOpen BUIJl activity I Stormwater I 11 f 26 I 55 to 71 ppb I EPA314.0 I
Discharge to public drinking water Caney Lake as
source-Several miles to Caney Emergency Feed
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Lake water for other
Army IRed River Army Depot I X-1 ISanitary Sewer Ptant I Groundwater I 1 I 14 I 6.8 ppb max I 314
Discharge to public drinking water Caney Lake as
I source-Several miles to Caney Emergency Feed
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Lake water for other
~
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army JRed River Army Depot I X-1 ISanitary Sewer Plant I Sedimant I 0 I 5 I NO I EPA 314.0 I none
water for other
'lakes. State has
sampled with the
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
---
State using
Caney Lake as
Emergency Feed
Army. IRed River Army Depot I X-1 ISanitary Sewer Plant I Soil I 2 I 51 I 226 ppb I
Lake several miles away
water for oll1er
EPA 314.0 I Runoff to Surface Water to Caney Ilakes. Slate has
sampled wi.lI1l11e
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army and found
no Perchlorate in
lake.
Army I Camp Bullis Training Site I OB/OD. MW1 10BOD I Groundwater I 3 I unavailable I 15.2 - 22 ppb I EPA 314 I Several miles to Water Supply Well I
State has verbally
requested 10
sample.
I
IMNSurface
WaterRO
--
Army I Camp Bullis Training Site 2.33 - 4.91 ppb'
Stale has verbally
Several miles to Water Supply Well requested to
sample.
I
IMNSurface
WaterRO
File: PercOata_A1ISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other 'Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 63 of 73
Regulatory

Equipment, M;tivities) I
Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Numberof Number of Range ~f
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements}
Army I Camp Bullis Training Site I OB/OD, MWl 10BOD I Groundwater I 2 I unavailable I 6.4 - 9.3 ppb I EPA3f4 I Several miles to Water Supply Well I
State has verbally
requested to
sample.
I
IMNSurface
WaterRO
Army I Camp Bullis Training Site I OB/OD,m 10BOD I Groundwater I 3 I unavailable I 3.18 - 345ppb' I EPA 314.0 I Several miles to Water Supply Well I
State has verbally
requested to
sample.
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
---
Army I Camp Bullis Training Site I OBIOD,W3 10BOD J Groundwater I 2 I unavailable I 2.55 - 4.48 ppb' I EPA 314.0 ISeveral miles to Water Supply Weill
Slate has verbally
requested to
sample.
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
---
State will include
Army I
McAlester Army
Ammunition Plant
IRocket Lake I Potential source - OB/OD I Surface Water I 0
I 26
I NO
I EPA 314 Inone
Perchlorate at
I Permit renewal
(negotiations on-
I IMNSurface
WaterRO
going).
I
I~ monitoring Not required
(sampling
Army I Umatilla Chemical Depot 1:;lIs, ati
In onn onm
activities Groundwater 5 5 5.0-9.6 EPA3f4 No exposure pathway known
conducted in
I IMA
unavailable 1990's)
Not required
139 monitoring
(sampling
Army I Umatilla Chemical Depot Iwells, information activities Groundwater 0 39 NO EPA 314 none
conducted in
I IMA
unavailable
1990's)
Army I Picatinny Arsenal

I 142JPICA f 11 I perchlorate production, disposal and
(RI concept site) research related activities I Groundwater I I I
5 (including
duplicate)
11 2.6 - 616 ppb'
I I EPA314
of plume
NJDEP and EPA
drinkibng water wells within 1/4 milel want additonal I
sampling for IRP
IMNNERO
investigation

I 142JPICA 111 I perchlorate production, disposal and
(RI concept site) research related activities I soil
I I 2
21 (ind.
dups)
up to 500ppb
of plume
NJDEP and EPA
drinking water wells within 1/4 mile want additonal I
sampling for IRP
IMNNERO
investigation

PICAth002
I(S
au em
I perchIorate production,
...
Boundary wells) research actiVIties
. d'Isposal an d
I I I
Groundwater 0
100
Qncluding
dups for
quarterly I NO
I I EPA 314 none INJDEP, EPA.
Developer
I IMNNERO
sampling
program
potential pathway through bedrock
lopen Detonation
Disposal and detonation activities Groundwater 13 42 up to 20 ppb EPA314 to neighboring township where I
NJDEP RCRA
IMNN~RO
Anea perchlorate has been detected at < ' I
1 ppb
Army FortDix
Disposal and
detonation OB/OD Groundwater 1 4 NO - 28 ppb' EPA 314 No potential pathways known I NJDEP required
I IMNNERO
J I activities
sampling
File: PercData..AJISvcs_ApriI2217_
Regulatory

Source of Perchlwate (Operations,
location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
~f Analytical rqUeSled,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure pe~illing
Interest (Cleanup
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
-
FX training field IA i f ' C' rPAand MOE
Anny I Aberdeen Proving Ground 1 (western study Training - pyrotechnics and smokes
Groundwater
63 125 ND-23.4ppb* 314.0/1ppb ~urdersuPPheswatertothe Itynf advisorieslrecom I IMNNERO
(Monitoring well) e een mendalions
boundary area)
314.0/1 ppb
Groundwater and Aquifer supplies water to the City of Recommended
Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining - pyrotechnics and smokes I (OPT)
249 268 NO - 3.500 ppb*
STl-M-CI04/ Aberdeen by EPA
I IMNNERO
500 ppb
Army I 'Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA ITraining • pyrotechnics and smokes I Soil (borings) 1 202 I 610 1ND· 12000 b* 13140/10 b leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended I IMNNERO
• pp . pp waler to the City of Aberdeen by EPA
I Aberdeen Proving Ground I I 314.0/4 b ,leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended
Anny FTXAREA ITraining· pyrotechnics and smokes I Surface Water I 0 I 4 I ND
pp water to the CIty of Aberdeen by EPA
I IMNNERO
leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended

Anny J Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA 'Training - pyrotechnics and smokes I sediment I 0 I 4 I ND 1314.0/10ppb
water to the City of Aberdeen by EPA
I IMNNERO
314.01 leach down to Aquifer that supplies Recommended

Army I Aberdeen Proving Ground I FTXAREA Training - pyrotechnics and smokes surface soil 21 126 NO - 590ppb
10ppb* water to the City 01 Aberdeen by EPA
I IMNNERO
Army
·
Various .....
areas/ran es in ActIVIties involVIng usage 01 propellants,
I Aberdeen ProVIng Ground I the Ed ~OOd ordnance. dored smokes and chemical Soil (bolings) 1 11 0.42J 314.011ppb none
I
Recommended
by EPA
I IMNNERO
g agents
area
·
Various
-
I . . ., 1
areas/ran es in Activities InvolVing usage 0 propell~nts,
I I I I I
Army I Aberdeen ProVIng Ground I the Ed e~ood ordnance. clored smokes and chel1llcal
g agents
area
I Surface Water 0 23 ND 314.0/4ppb Inone
Recommended
by EPA
I IMNNERO
-
Anny
·
~IiOUS . rctivifieS involving usage 01 propellants.
area ran es In
I Aberdeen ProVIng Ground I the Ed e~ood ordnance, clored smokes and chemical
.
I sediment
I 3
1
17
I
ND to 17 ppb*
I 314.0/
looppb
Inane known
I
Recommended
by EPA
I IMNNERO
g agents
area
--
Valious . __. .
·
areas/ran es in ActiVItIes InvolVIng usage 01 propellants. 314.0/ Recommended
Anny I Aberdeen ProVIng Ground I the Ed ~ood ordnance, dored smokes and chemical surface soil 1 3 ND· 7.7 ppb
looppb
none known
by EPA
I IMNNERO
g agents
area
In small creek Coordinating

Off site migration confirmed along
Anny I Redstone Arsenal I near English Rocket exploration operation soil unavailable unavailable up to 37,000 ppb* 314.0
eastern boundary
progress with I IMNSERO
Vdlage regUlators
File: PercData_AIISvcs_ApIi12217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup. Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 65 0123
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
I I Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested,
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements}
I
I I I I
Potential pathway to wetlands used
Below small Coordinating
for recreation. Also potential for
Army I Redstone Arsenal I creek near Roellet exploration operation Groundwater unavailable unavailable up to 19,000 PPb-1 314.0 progress with I IMAISERO
English Village uptake in wetland grasses used for
regulators
feed for beef callie.
I EPA314/4
Army I Lake City AAP I Area 18 IHistoric operationslbuming I Groundwater I 0 I 18 I NO
20 ppb
none
I sampling
....!!9.uirements
I IMAINWRO
Perchlorate has
been detected in
the Lakewood
Waler District
I
drinking water
Army I Fort Lewis

Monitoring wells
I around Impact
areas
Impact areas
I I I I
Groundwater 0 12 NO
I EPA 314
I None
I production wells.
Fl. Lewis,
MeChOrd AFB, I IMAINWRO
and Lakewood
Water District are
within the footprintl
of tI1e "Central
Pierce County
Aquife" Sole
Source Aquifer
Perchlorate has
been detected in
the Lakewood
Water District
drinking water
production wells.
Springs around Ft. Lewis,
Army Fort Lewis Impact areas Ilmpact areas Surface waler o 5 NO EPA314 none MeChOrd AFB, I IMAI NWRO
and Lakewood
Water District are
within the footprint
of the "Central
Pierce County
Aquife" Sole
Source Aquifer
File: PereData_AJISvcs_April 2217_

Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other - Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 66 of73
Regulatory
Service I Facility t Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Number of Number of Range of
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
Irequested,
Method Potenttal Pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requiremenls,
I Funding Type
sampling
requiremenls)
Perchlorate has
been detected in
the lakewood
Water District
drinking water
production wells.
Ft, lewis,
Army j Fort lewis I Nisqually River Ilmpacl areas I sediment I 0 I 3 I ND I EPA 314 I none f MeChom AFB, I IMNNWRO
and lakewood
Water District are
within the footprintl
of the "Central
Pierce County
Aquife(' Sole
Source Aquifer
BUilding 528
Ammunition Future permit
Army I Fort'Mngate I Normal Munition Demil soil 29 31 nd - 3.18 ppm
EPA 314 requirements for I
modified IMNNWRO
Maintenance sampling and
BUilding cleanup
Former TNT Future permit

Army I Fort'Mngate I Washout Munition Demil soil 1 11 nd- 0.10 ppm
EPA 314 requiremenls for I
modified IMNNWRO
Facilities sampling and
cleanup
Army I Fort'Mngate I Washout Munition Demil Groundwater 12 47 nd -76.6ppb" EPA 314.0
requirements for I
IMNNWRO
Facilities sampling and
cleanup
Washout 2,440 ppb - 2,890 requ!rements for I
Army I Fort'Mngale I Facilities and
Munition Demil Groundwater 2 2
ppb
EPA 314.0 IMNNWRO
sampling and
Building 528 cleanup
Former TNT
Washout Future permit
Army I Fort'Mngate I Facilities and Munition DemH Groundwater 2 17 nd - 9.4 ppb" EPA 314.0 requirements for I
IMNNWRO
Buildings 542/ sampling and
600 cleanup
Former TNT
Washout Future permit
Army I Fort'Mngate I Facilities and Munition Demil Groundwater 0 16 nd - 10.0 ppb" 314.0
requirements for I
IMNNWRO
Admin$lration sampling and
Area cleanup
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other "Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

Page 67 of13
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
N be f Number of Range of
Dum •r 0 Samples Concentrations
etectlons Collected Detected (ppb)
I I A I . I
e
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested,
;a::~a Potential pathway(s) of Exposure permitting
requirements,
J Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Former TNT
Army I Fort \Ningate , Washout
Facilities and
Northern
Munition Demil Groundwater 0 8 nd 314.0 None
Future pennit
requirements for I
sampling and
IMAINWRO
Property cleanup
Boundary
Fulure pennit
Army , Fort \Ningate , Sewage

Treabnent Munition Demil Groundwater 0 2 nd 314.0 none
requirements for
sampling and
I IMAINWRO
Facility
cleanup
Army I Fort \Ningate , 08/~~s~a - IMUnitiOn Demil

I Groundwater
I 1
I
14
I nd - 10.0 ppb
I 314.0
I I Future permit
requirements for I
sampling and
IMAINWRO
cleanup
Future pennit
Anny I Fort \Ningate , OB/OD Area-
current
Munition Demil Groundwater 14 39 nd - 15.0 ppb" 314.0
requirements for I
sampling and
IMAINWRO
cleanup
Surface
ingestion of soil, dennal contact, or Site
WaterMU3
,crane Army Ammunilion Surface and EPA Method inhalation of windblown particles. characterization
Army
Activity
IAmmunition Open Burning Operations
subsurface soil
5 100 0- 470 ppb*

314.0 No known patheay to drinking water for RCRA
I AMC-JMC
Burning Ground
source. Corrective Action
& Old Jeep Trail
Army I
Iowa Army Ammunition
Plant
East Bum Pads 'Unknown - potential source - OB/OD I Groundwater , , ,
1 12 Q-8.8ugn..* I 314.0/4ugn.. I none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Iowa Army Ammunition North Bum Pads .

Army I Plant
LF Unknown - potential source - OB/OD Groundwater 1 10 Q-3.2ugn..* I 314.0/4ug/L I none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Iowa Army Ammunition Inert Disposal

0-<8.8ugn.. (Matrix I 314.0/4u n.. I
Army I Plant Area
Unknown Groundwater 1 20
Interference)" g
none or limited I sampling I AMC-JMC
Iowa Army Ammunition Line 800/Pink
Army I Plant Waler Lagoon

Unknown - potential source - LAP Groundwater 1 12 Q-2Bugn..* 314.0/4ugn.. none or limited sampling I AMC-JMC
Site
Lone Star Army High Explosives EPA Method characterization 'ER A (AMC-J MC)
Army I Ammunition Plant Burning Grounds
Potential source - OBIOD Groundwater 1 8 up to 7.95 ppb*
314.0
Ingestion
forRCRA '
Corrective Action
Lone Star Army Production EPA Method permilting

Army I Ammunition Plant Building P-29
Production Soil (Surface) 1 1 8.86 ppb
314.0
ingestion, dennal contact, inhalation
requirements
IER,A (AMC-JMC)
Army
I Radford Army Ammunition
,Plant
I Surface
WaterMU54
Groundwater 1 4 nd-10.r 314 No exposure pathway known
Installation
Restoration I AMC-JMC
Program
Installation
Radford Army Ammunition
Anny
Plant
all NO none Restoration I AMC-JMC
Program
File: PercData_A1ISvC5_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other

* Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 68 of 73
Regulatory

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I
I I.Analytical I
Interest (Cleanup
requ~sted,
Method Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure pe~'tt,"g
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Army I Radford Army Ammunition

Plant
I N R' U't
ew Iver no
I I Surtace Water
I 1
I 24
I 00-1.71*
I 314
I none
J
Inslallation
Restoration J AMC-JMC
~ram
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation, requirements,
Army I
Massachusetts Military
Reservation (MMR) I Demo 1
jArtillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firwor1<s Use
and Disposal, Military Training wilh
Pyrotechnics
Soil 12 171 NO - 26.88*
314.0/3.2
ppb
Sole source aquifer used for
drinking water
deanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
altemate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal, Open BumlOpen Detonation, requirements,
Massachusetts Military Artillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firwor1<s Use 314.0/3.2 Sole source aqUifer used for deanup
Army CIA Soil 5 194 NO - 41000 ARNG
Reservation (MMR) and Disposal. Military Training with ppb drinking water requested,
Pyrotechnics provision of
altemate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation, requirements,
Massachusetts Military Southeast Artillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firworks Use 314.013.2 Sole source aquifer used for deanup
Army Soil 67 511 NO -134000* ARNG
Reservation (MMR) Ranges and Disposal, Military Training with ppb drinking water requested,
altemate water
supplies
requested.
File: PercData~A1ISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other * Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 69 of 73
Regulatory
Service , Facility I Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I
N b f Numberof
O::ct~:::s
Range of
A Iyf I
~:t~C:
Interest (Cleanup
reqUested,
Potential Palhway(s) of Exposure permitting
requIrements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requiremenls)
I",eal
Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation, Administrative
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I Northwest IArtiliery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use
Comer and Disposal, Military Training with
Pyrotechnics
Soil 20 116 ND-7560'
314,0/3.2
ppb
Sole source equifer used for
drinking water
Orders, sampling
requirements.
cleanup
I
ARNG
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal. Open Bum/Open Delonation, requirements.
Massachusetts Military Western
Anny I Reservation (MMR) I Boundary
IArtillery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use
and Disposal, Military Training with
Pyrotechnics
Soil 0 92 ND
314.0/3.2
ppb
none
cleanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Anny I
Reservation (MMR)
I Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation,
E ryth. EI IArtilery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use
ve mg se and Disposal, Military Training with Soil 1 107 NO - 60'
314.0/3.2
ppb
Sole source aqUifer used for
drinking water
requirements,
cleanup
requested,
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
--
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation, requirements.
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I
Demo 1
/ArtiUery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use
Pyrotechnics
Groundwater 143 604 NO - 500'
314.0/1.0
ppb
Sole source aquifer used fOr
drinking water
cleanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
--
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation.
I I
requirements,
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I
CIA
!Artillery Firing (UTR Rounds), Firworks Use
Pyrotechnics
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
cleanup
requested.
provision of
ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
I I I I I I I I I I
File: PercDatafiIlSvcs_ApriI2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other ' Method 314 reporting Iimil is 4 ppb Page 70 0173
Regulatory
Service I FacHity I Site I

Location
Detected
(Media)
I I I I I.
Numberof Numberof Range~f
Analytical
Interest (Cleanup
Irequested.
Method PotentIal Pathway(s) of Exposure ,permilling
requirements.
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal. Open Bum/Open Detonation. requirements,
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I Southeast IArtillery Firing (lITR Rounds). Firwor1<s Use
Ranges and Disposal. Military Training with
Pyrotechnics
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
deanup
requested.
provision of
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
-
SedimenlWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Disposal. Open Bum/Open Detonation, requirements,
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I Northwest IArtillery Filing (lITR Rounds), Firworks Use
Comer and Disposal, Military Training with
Pyrotechnics
Groundwater 39 99 NO - 19.3'
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
deanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
altemate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders, sampling
Disposal, Open BumlOpen Detonation, requirements,
Army I
Reservation (MMR) I Westem
Boundary
\Artillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firworks Use
Pyrotechnics
Groundwater 36 3029 NO - 2.89'
314.0/1.0
ppb
drinking water
deanup
requested,
provision of
I ARNG
altemate water
supplies
requested.
SedimentWA
Administrative
Orders. sampling
Army I
Reservation (MMR)
I Disposal, Open Bum/Open Detonation,
E ryth. EI IArtillery Firing (L1TR Rounds), Firwor1<s Use
ve 'ng se and Disposal, Military Training with Groundwater 13 488 ND-17.r
314.0/1.0
ppb
SOI~ source aquifer used for
drinking water
requirements.
cleanup
requested,
I ARNG
alternate water
supplies
requested.
I
00 Pits 10, 11.

314.012.0
Army I Camp Navlljo
17
Munitons disposal surface water 3 11 ND-37"
ppb
drinking water RCRA I ARNG
Kerr-McGee Groundwater Groundwater/surface water, A Regulatory and
Arm / FUDS IKerr-McGee Perchlorate
Y I
Plant, Henderson. NV
Perchlorate
Plan\,
Source - Chemical Manufacturing Surface Waler 3,700,000 ppb,
Surface Waler
NA perchlorale contaminated congressional, I FUDS
!Qroundwaler plume extends from Kerr-McGee
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other 'Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

Page 71 of 73
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
location
1Dum
N be f I Number of I Range of I A I . I I
Equipment, Activities) I Detected
(Media) elections Collected Detected (ppb) et 0
rquested.
.r 0 Samples Concentrations ~a ~~a Potential Pathway(s) of Exposure permiffing
requirements,
I Funding Type
sampling
requirements)
Groundwater 31 to
81 ppb
I NA IGroundwater t I FUDS
Rialto (fOfTTler1y
Rialto (formerly Riallo rialtO
Army 1 FUDS !Ammunition Supply Point), Ammunition I
Source - Firewor1<s FacMy(?), BF Goodrich'IDrinkin g Water
Rocket Research and Manufacturing I I I DW>4ppb and
811 ppb I NA /Drinking water supply wells
IRegional Water
Board
I FUDS
Rialto, CA Supply Point),
Rialto,CA
Groundwater-Ol
413 ugll,
y AR "landfill"
Shumaker NAD, IAtiantic Research washed ammonium
Arm 1 FUDS ,Shumaker NAD, Camden, ICamden, AR
"landfill"
Ip~rchlorate
out of
"!
r~cket motor~
and
d,sp~Sed large pIeces 01 AP ,n an open
Groundwater 3 16 850 ugll;
I
Groundwater-OlD EPA 314
Water
Is rti . I A '1
u CIa qUI er
IEPA Threatened
7003 Order
I FUDS
bUffilnguOlt. Groundwater-02D
475 ugll
Arm 1 FUDS ,Former Walker AFB,

y RoSurface waterell, NM
USACE conducted groundwater sample
Former Walker collection and analysis of perchlorate in Nov
\AFB, RoSurface 03. The samples were coUected near an Groundwater
Waterell. NM OB/OD and rocket test facility. Perchlorate
was non-detect
NO 3 Non-Detect 1314/0~ I
mgn (Pal) none
ramPle collection
requested by the I
Slate of New
Mexico
FUDS
Tyson Valley
Tyson Valley Powder Farm'rOWder Farm, EPA lesled for perchlorate and did not
Army I FUDSIEureka. MO (AOCs 15-17, Eureka, MO locate any at the explosive storage and IGroundwater I NO I I Non-Detect I 314 INone IEPA I FUDS
23-29,31 and 34) (AOCs 15-17, 23 testing facility
29.31 and 34)
Mead, NE
I
Nebraska
Army 1 FUDS ,NebraSka Ordnance Plant, Ordnance Plant EPAhas sampled for Perchlorate down Groundwater
Mead, NE 'grad,ent of a former fireworks manufacturer
NO Non-Detect I 314 INone IEPA I FUDS
Sample which
Nebraska showed
Army 1 FUDS ,~::s~~ Ordnance Plant, lordnance Plant,
USACE monitored East of Load line 4 at the
Groundwaler 1 2 contaminated was I 314 INane INA I FUDS
Former Ordnance Plant
, Mead,NE estimated to be
3ppb
Blaine Naval
Arm 1FUDS I Blaine Naval Ammunition IAmmUnilion
y Depot, Hastings, NE Depot, Hastings,
USAGE sampled for perchlorate at the
Ordnance Planl during the 2002 NAD-wide Groundwater NO 58 None
I EPA Method
314.0 Inone INA I FUDS
sampling event
NE
Arm IFUDS ,KGDA Nike 60, Gardner, KGDA Nike 60, USAGE sampled for Perchlorate at the 25.4 ppband Direct contact of soit with students
Y KS Gardner, KS grade school at the Former Nike Site
Soil 2 4
37.6 ppb
Method 9058
at grade school
NA I FUDS
Sampling
A I
1 FUDS larson AFB, Moses lake, larson AFB, Groundwater sampling Groundwater ND 2 Non-detect 314 none suggested by I FUDS
rmy WA Moses Lake, WA
EPA
File: PercData_AJISvcs_April2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 72 of73
Regulatory
Interest (Cleanup
Location Number of Range of requested,
Source of Perchlorate (Operations, Number of Analytical .
Service Facility Site Detected Samples Concentrations fPotentlal Pathwayts) of Exposure permitting Funding Type
EqUipment, Activities) Detections Meth od
(Media) Collected Detected (ppb) requirements,
sampling
requirements)
EPA and Virginia

DEQ believe all
ordnance relaled
sites have the
The Method
potential for
Detection
perchlorate
Nansemond ITNT Sleam Out area known to be Limit was
t
Army I FUDS Nansemond Ordnance Ordnance Depot, contaminate with bulk TNT and other Groundwater NO 3 NO 0.97 ug/L and/none
contamination.
FUDS
Depot, Suffolk VA Based on their
Suffolk VA Ordnance and Explosive debris. the Reporting
interest
Limit was 10
perchlorate was
ug/L.
added to the list
ofCoCs for
testing at the
FNOD TNT area.
In FY02, althe
request of the
State of
Massachusetts,
NAE sampled
Hingham Bum seral (3?) wells
Hingham Bum Site
Site for various
Army I FUDS 1001 MA023207 Explosive Residue Groundwater NO 3 non-detect NA none FUDS
D01MA023207 contaminants
Massachusetts
Massachusetts related to
explosive residue,
one of which was
perchlorate.
Nothing was
found.
File: PercQata_AlISvcs_April 2217_
Sheet: Env Restoration-Cleanup, Other • Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb Page 73 0173
Service I
Name
.
I I I Dates
Installallon State EP.A Sampling
Region Conducted
I DWSource
(Surface or
Groundwaler)
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling
Regulatory
Driver Ciled
Pe~hlorate I Samplingl
samPI;;:b~eSUIIs Analytical Method 1 Comments or References
. Note. Survey Include responses for both NAW5-China lake and NOlF San Nicotas Island~ China lake is located in Cafifomia's Mojave Desert in
Navy 1 Marine Corps Perchlorate Survey - 3. dry lake (playa) erMrMmenl USGS has tested nearby Seal1es lake USIng EPA 314 and detected htgh concentrations of natualty occ:uing
UCMR and Drinking Water perchlorate in Ihe evaporite deposits found there. Some of the perchforate detections at China lake may be due 10 naturally oecunirtg perchlorate.
The Federal Faciity Identification Number (fFIO) lor San Nicolas Island '5: CA7110090206
Navyl Marine Corps Water Treatment Plant Marine Corps Base Quantico. 3.b.4. SDWA-UCMR Date /I Sample No.:
VA 3 212512003 Surface Water NO Federal; State <4" EPA314
Marine Corps Base Quantico (Plant Effluent POE) 02125/2003 /I 03-02626 Quantification Level: 4 uglL Result: < 4ugll
Navyl Marine Corps Water Treatmenl Plant Marine Corps Base Quantico. 3.b.4. SDWA-UCMR Date /I Sample No.:
VA 3 511312003 Surface Water NO Federal; State <4" EPA 314
Marine Corps Base Quantico (Plant Effluent POE) 05/1312003/1 03-07104 Quantification Level: 4 uglL Result: < 4 uglL
Navyl Marine Corps Waler Treatment Planl Marine Corps Base Quantico. 3.b.4. SDWA-UCMR Date /I Sample No.:
VA 3 812612003 Surface Water NO Federal; Slate <4* EPA 314
Marine Corps Base Quantico (Plant Effluent POE) 08/26/2003/1 02·13683 Quantification Level: 4 uglL Resull: < 4 uglL
Navyl Marine Corps Water Treatment Planl Marine Corps Base Quantico. 3.b.4. SDWA·UCMR Date /I Sample No.:
VA 3 11/1812003 Surface Water NO Federal; Slate <4" EPA314
Marine Corps Base Quantico (planl Effluent POE) 1111812003/1 03-18333 Quantification Level: 4 uglL Result: < 4 ugll
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 2121/2002 I Ground Waler 1 well.2202 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal: State I ND I EPA314
Marine Corps Pendleton
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 51212002 I Ground Water I well.2202 I YES I 1210112003 IFederal; Slate I ND I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 211212003 I Ground Water I well #2202 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I ND I EPA314
- I--
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 41912003 I Ground Waler I well #2202 I YES 1 1210112003 I Federal; Stale I ND I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 712312003 I Ground Water I Well.2202 j YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Statel ND I EPA 314
Navy! MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 121112003 I Ground Water 1 Well #2202 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal: Slate I ND I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 512912002 I Ground Water I Well #2301 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal: State I ND I EPA 314
- I--
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 1/2712003 I Ground Water I well #2301 I YES I 1210112003 IFederal: State I ND I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 211212003 I Ground Water I Well #2301 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I ND I EPA314
Navyl MCBCarnp
I CA I 9 I 4/1612003 I Ground Water I Well #2301 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal: Slate I ND I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 7/1712003 I Ground Water I Well #2301 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I I I I
CA
9 12/112003 Ground Water I Well #2301
I YES I
112101/2003 Federal; State I ND I EPA314
"Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 -Umit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking water + J value is statistical estimate Page 1 of 28
Service
I Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Dates
Sampling
Conducted
OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwaler)
I Sample Collection
Location
I Sampling 1 Expected I Regulatory
Planned D;te ofl~ext Driver Cited
amp 109
I pe~hlorate I Samplingl
SamPI~gb~esults Analytical Method I
pp
Comments or References
Navyl MCaCamp
CA 9 51912002 Ground water I Well #23063 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I ND I EPA 314
Navy! MCa Camp

I CA I 9 I 113012003 I Ground Water I Well #23063 1 YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I NO I 3oo.0B
Navyl MCa Camp

I CA I 9 I 51812003 I Ground Water I Well #23063 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCaCamp
I CA I 9 I 712412003 I Ground water t Well #23063 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Stale I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCaCamp
I CA I 9 I 121112003 I Ground Water I Well #23063 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slale I NO I EPA 314
i~aVYI MCaCamp
I CA I 9 I 1/23/2003 I Groond Waler I Well #23073 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal; Stale I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCaCamp
'Marine Corps Pendleton I . CA 9 2/1212003 Ground Water Well #23073
~~ . YES
;.,
1210112003 Federal; State NO EPA 314
"",,'If
EPA 314; Protocol
'.
Navyl IMca Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA 9 41312003 Ground Water Well #23073 YES 12/01/2003 Federal; State NO State CA DHS SRl
Revisio,n 0
I I I I
\ EPA 314; Protocol
Navyl IMca Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton CA 9 7/1712003 Ground water
I Well #23073
I YES 112/0112003 1Federal; State \ NO State CA DHS SRl
Revision 0
I I
I I I I
EPA 314; Protocol
Navyl \MCa Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton CA 9 121112003 Ground Water
I Well #23073
I YES 112101/2003 \ Federal; State ND State CA DHS SRl
Revision 0
Navyl \MCa Camp

Marine Corps Pendleton I I I
CA 9 3113/2002
\ Ground Water
I Well #2393
I YES I
\1210112003 Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314; Protocol
State CA DHS SRl
Revision 0
I EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl IMca Camp
CA 9 211212003
I Ground Water
I Well #2393
I YES 11210112003 !Federal; Statel NO State CA DHS SRl
Revision 0
I I I
I I I I
EPA 314; Protocol
Navyl IMCB Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton CA 9 41312003 Ground Water
I Well #2393
I YES 11210112003 Federal; State NO State CA DHS SRl
Revision 0
--
I I I EPA 314; Protocol
Navy! IMCB Camp
CA 9 519/2003
I Ground Waler
I Well #2393
I YES 112101/2003 Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl IMca Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton I
CA I 9
I
7123/2003
I Ground Water Well #2393 NO Stale CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
File; Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SDll -Umit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 2of28
Service I
Inslallation
Name
I I I Date~EPA
Slate Re ion Samplmg
I ow Source
(Surface or
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Regulatory
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
Sampling! I
Analytical Method
9 Conducted Groundwater) Sampling (ppb)
EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl IMCB Camp
CA 9 121112003
I Ground Water Wall #2393 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl "MCB Camp

,I CA 9
1
51912002
I Ground Water
I Well #2603
I YES I
11210112003 Federal; Slatel NO
I
EPA 314; Protocol
State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl IMCB Camp

Marine Corps Pendleton I
CA I 9
I 112712003
1
Ground Water
I Wall #2603
1
YES I
11210112003 Federal; Statel NO I
EPA 314; Protocol
State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
I I I
I I I
EPA 314; Protocol
Navyl IMCB Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton CA 9 211912003
I Ground Water
I Well #2603
I YES \1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
----
EPA 314; Prolocol
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 41912003 Ground Water Wall #2603 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 712412003 Ground Waler Well #2603 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO EPA 314
EPA 314; Protocol

Navy! MCBCamp
CA 9 121112003 Ground Water Well #2603 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
---
Navy! IMCB Camp
Marine Corps Pendleton I I ICA 9 112312003
I Ground Water
I Well #26072
1 YES I
11210112003 Federal; Statel NO I EPA 314; Protocol
State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
--
Navy! IMCB Camp
I Ground Water
I Wall #26072
1
YES I
11210112003 Federal; Slate I NO
EPA 314; Protocol
I State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
----
I I I EPA 314; Protocol
Navy! IMCB Camp
I Ground Water
I Well #26072
I YES 11210112003 Federal; Slate NO State CA DHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl IMCB Camp

CA 9 51912003
I Ground Water
I Wall #26072
I YES I
11210112003 Federal; State I NO
Protocol Slate CA
1OHS SRL Revision
0
Prolocol Slate CA
Navy! MCBCamp
CA 9 712312003 Ground Water Well #26072 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO DHS SRL Revision
0
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 121112003 Ground Water Wall #26072 YES 1210112003 Federal; State ND EPA 314
I I I I I I I I
Navy! MCBCamp
9 51912002 Ground Water Well #2671 NO Federal; State I ND I EPA 314
CA
• Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0S011 **Limit of detection by melhod 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Pag,,-3_oL28
Service I
Installation
Name
I I I EPA
State R ion
Date~
Samphng
1 (Surface
OW Source
or
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Regulatory
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
Samplingl I
Analytleal Method
Comm.ents or References
eg Conducted Groundwater) Sampling (ppb)
EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl IMCB Camp Well #2671
CA 9 112312003 Ground Water NO Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision a
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 411012003 Ground Water Well #2671 NO Federal; State ND EPA 314
Maline Corps Pendleton
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 51912002 Ground Water Well #2673 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO EPA 314
EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 112212003 Ground Water Well #2673 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CADHS SRL
Maline Corps Pendleton
Revision 0
I I
I I I
EPA 314; Protocol
Navyl lMCB Camp
Maline Corps Pendleton CA 9 211912003
I Ground Water
I Well #2673
I YES 11210112003 I,Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
I I I I
I I I
EPA 314; Protocot
r-tavyl IMCB Camp
Marine Corps Pendlelon CA 9 41912003
I Ground Water
I Well #2673
I YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl IMCB Camp

Marine Corps Pendleton I CA
1
9
I 711612003
I Ground Water
I Well #2673
I
YES I
11210112003 Federal; State I NO
EPA 314; Protocol
IStateCA OHS SRL
Revision 0
EPA 314; Protocol

Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 121112003 Ground Water Well #2673 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO State CA OHS SRL
Revision 0
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 211312002 Ground Water Well #330923 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO EPA314
- I--
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 51912002 t Ground Water I Well #330923 I YES I 1210112003 IFederal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 21612003 I Ground Water I Well #330923 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 412312003 I Ground Water I Well #330923 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 812712003 I Ground Water I Well #330923 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
---
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 121112003 t Ground Water I Well #330923 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
Well #330925 Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
• Method 314 reporting Iimil is 4 ppb'

File: Consolida1ed Services_UCMR and NPOES_26Apr04_0SD11 ""Limit of det.ic1ion by method 314 as staled by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 4 of 28
Dates OW Source
I I I I Per~hlorate I
I
I
Installation EPA Sample Collection Sampling Expected Regulatory Samplingl
Service State Sampling (Surface or PI ed Date of Next D" C"ted Sampling Results A Iyt" I M th d I· Comments or References
Name Region Location ann Sampling nver I (ppb) na Ica e 0
Conducted Groundwater)
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 51912002 Ground water I Well #330925 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 21612003 I Ground Water I Well#J30925 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 4/1012003 I Ground Water I Well #330925 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 7/16/2003 I Ground Water I Well #330925 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 1211/2003 I Ground Water I Well #330925 I YES J 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 2/1312002 I Ground Water I Well #33924 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I ND I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 51912002 I Ground Waler I Well #33924 I YES I 1210112003 !Federal; State] ND I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 2121/2003 I Ground Water I Well#3J924 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; Slalel NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 4/1412003 I Ground water I WeIl#J3924 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 7/1712003 I Ground Water I Well #33924 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 12/112003 I Ground Water I Well #33924 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Marine Corps Pendlelon
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 518/2002 I Ground Water I Well #41611 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 21612003 I Ground Water I Well #41611 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 412/2003 I Ground Water I Well #41611 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 7/24/2003 I Ground Water I Well #41611 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 12/112003 I Ground Water I Wen #41611 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; Slatel NO I EPA314
- f-
Navyl MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendlelon I I I I
CA
9 5/8/2002 Ground water I Wen#41613
1
YES I
11210112003 Federal; State I NO I EPA 314

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 **limit 01 detection by method 314 as staled by laboratory"
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 50f28
Service
Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Dates
Sampling
DWSource
(Surface or
I Sample Collection
Location
I I I I
Sampling Expected Regulatory
anne Sampling nver .te
pe~hlorate
(ppb)
Sampling/
na ytlca e
I
PI d Date of Next D' C' d Sampling Results A I . I M thod I Comments or References
Conducted Groundwater)
Navy/ MCBCamp
CA 9 216/2003 Ground Water I Well #41613 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 4/212003 I Ground Water I Well #41613 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Statel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 812712003 I Ground Water I Well #41613 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slatel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 12/112003 I Ground Water I Well #41613 I YES I 1210112003 IFederal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
- t--
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 5/8/2002 J Ground Water I Well #41621 I YES ] 1210112003 I Federal; Statel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 21612003 I Ground Water I Well #41621 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slatel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 4/212003 I Ground Water I Well #41621 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/
- - MCBCamp
I CA. I 9 I 712412003 I Ground Water I Well #41621 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; Statel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 1 12/112003 I Ground Water I Well #41621 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 51812002 I Ground Water J Well #52013 I NO I IFederal; State I NO I EPA314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 5/812002 I Ground Water I Well #52023 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
--
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 212/2003 I Ground Water I Well #52023 I YES I 12101/2003 IFederal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 413/2003 I Ground Water I Well #52023 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 7/17/2003 I Ground Water I Well #52023 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 12/1/2003 I Ground Water I Well #52023 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Statel NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 2120/2002 I Ground Water I Well #52028 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navy/ MCBCamp
Well #52028 Federal; State] NO I EPA 314

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0S011 -Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 6 0128
Service
l Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Oates
Sampling
OW Source
(Surface or
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Regulatory
DrlverCited
Per~hlorate I Samplingl
samPI;:b~esults Analytical Method I Comments or References
Conducted Groundwater) Sampling
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 2/512003 Ground Water Well #52028 YES 1210112003 Federal; State NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCaCamp
Navyl MCB Camp

I CA I 9 I 7/1712003 I Ground Wawr I Well #52028 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCB Camp

Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 5Ill12oo2 I Ground Water I Well #61511 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCa Camp

I CA I 9 I 21512003 I Ground Water I Well #61511 I YES \ 12101/2003 \ Federal; Stale! NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCB Camp

I CA I 9 I 4/2/2003 I Ground Water I Well #61511 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal; Sialel NO I EPA 314
Navyl MCa Camp

I CA I 9 I 7/16/2003 I Ground Waler I Well #61511 I YES \ 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 12/112003 I Ground Water I Well #61511 I YES I 12/0112003 I Federal; Slate I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 212012002 I Ground Water I Well #61521 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 518/2002 I Ground Water I Well #61521 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; State I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
Marine Corps Pendleton I CA I 9 I 2/512003 I GroUlid Water I Well #61521 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 4/212003 I Ground Water I Well #61521 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; Slate I NO
~ EPA 314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 7/16/2003 I Ground Water I Well #61521 I YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCa Camp

I CA I 9 I 121112003 I Ground Water I Well #61521 I YES I 12/01/2003 I Federal; State I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl MCa Camp

Marine Corps Pendlelon
I CA I 9 I 51812002 I Ground Water I Well #62621 I YES I 1210112003 I Federal; Slate I NO
I EPA 314
Navyl Mea Camp

Well #62621 Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 '"Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratOlY.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is slatistical estimate Page 7 of 28
Service
Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Dates
Sampling
Conducted
DWSource
(Surface or
Groundwater)
I Sample Collection
Location
I I I I
PI ed Date of Next D
ann Sampling nver I e
0
Pe~hlorate
(ppbl
I
Samplingl
COt d Sampling Results A I . I M hod I
na ytica et
Navyl MCBCamp
CA 9 41212003 Ground Water I well #62621 I YES J 12/0112003 I Federal; StateI NO I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CAl 9 I 7/1612003 I Ground Water I Well #62621 I YES ( 1210112003 (Federal; State I ND I EPA314
Navyl MCBCamp
I CA I 9 I 121112003 I Ground Water ( well #62621 ( YES I 12101/2003 I Federal; State I ND I EPA314
Marine Corps
MNavyl. C L·IiB I
OQIS cs ase CA I 9 I 5131/2001 I Ground Water I Yermo Drinking well #4 I NO I I State I ND I EPA314
anne orps Barstow
--
N 1
Mavy C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base I CA
anne orps Barstow
I 9 I 6119/2002 I Ground Water I Yenno Drinking well #4 I NO 1 I State I NO I EPA314
--
N 1
I
Marine Corps
Ma"'! Co Logistics Base I CA
anne rps Barstow
I 9 I 611212003 I Ground Water I Yermo Drinking well #4 I NO I I State I NO I EPA 314
--
N I
Mavy C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base I CA
anne orps Barstow
I 9 I 513112001 I Ground Water I Yermo Drinking VVeIl #5 I NO I I State I NO I EPA 314
--
N J
Ma"'! C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base I CA
anne orps Barstow
I 9 I 6119/2002 I Ground Water I Yenno Drinking well #5 I NO I I Slale I NO I EPA 314
-
N 1
Ma"'! C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base
anne orps Barstow
CA 9 6/1212003 Ground Water Yermo Drinking well #5 NO Slate NO EPA 314
N 1 Marine Corps There is no known source of perchlorate for MCLB Barstow. Sampling
Mavy C IL09istics Base CA 9 10129/2002 Ground Waler Yermo Drinking well #6A NO Slate NO EPA 314 was Slate of California requirement per Title 22 Califomia Code Of
anne orps Barstow RegUlations Section 64450 for unregulaled chemical monitoring. •
N J
Mavy C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base
anne orps Barstow
CA 9 214/2003 Ground Water YermoDrinking Well #6A NO Slale ND EPA314
--
N 1
Mavy C I
Marine Corp s
Logistics Base I CA
anne orps Barstow
I 9 I 5/1312003 I Ground Water I Yermo Drinking Well #6A I NO I I Slate I NO I EPA 314
--
N 1
Mavy C I
Marine Corps
Logistics Base I CA
anne orps Barstow
I 9 I 8/1412003 I Ground Waler I Yermo Drinking well #6A I NO I I Slate I ND I EPA 314
N J IMCBcamp Oulflow Of Hadnol Point

Mavy C LejeunelMCAS
Treatment Plant
Federal I ND I EPA314
anne orps New River

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0S011 -Umit of detection by method 314 as slated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 8 of28
.';li,;J';;\ii;J1 tr.,);,"·\;!"'·;;i;· ' Ii', .... j';;;';;; '.·'tb·.·" }':,·x. '.,/' }';' ..,)); '.\)\.2M'?';;;"'1" ·.,/A 'ii .'' '" ""'.~j@llBii."'\""::!i'3k.,>g:Htr ''Uf/r ,di .!i·;.}\.;;\rt,X,.g'....iii.·····...: ·':·H"..!."":"':;''''''';'
Dates Ow Source Expected Perchlorate

Samplingl
Installation EPA Sample Collection Sampling Regulatory
Service State Sampling (Surface or Date of Next Sampling Results Comments or References
Name Region Location Planned Driver Cited Analytical Method
Conducted Groundwater) Sampling (ppb)
MCBCamp
Navyl Outflow Of Holcomb Blv
LejeunelMCAS NC 4 7/2512001 Ground Water NO Federal ND EPA 314
Marine Corps Treatment Plant
New River
MCBCamp
Navyl Outllow Of MCAS
LejeunelMCAS NC 4 7125/2001 Ground Water NO Federal ND EPA314
New River
MCBCamp
Navyl Outflow Of MCAS
LejeunelMCAS NC 4 512712003 Ground Waler NO Federal ND EPA 314
New River
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 1211212001 Ground Water Source Well10A NO Federal; State ND EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 611212002 Ground Water Source Well lOA NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 1211112002 Ground Water Source Well 10A NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 8128/1997 Ground Water Source Well 11A NO Federal; Stale NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 6/1212002 Ground Water Source Well 1fA NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 1211112002 Ground Water Source Well 11 A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 8/28/1997 Ground Water Source Well 2A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 8/28/1997 Ground Waler Source Well 3A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 1211212001 Ground Water Source Well 3B NO Federal; State ND EPA 314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 611212002 Ground Water Source Well 38 NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 1211112002 Ground Water Source Well 3B NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
CA 9 8/28/1997 Ground Water Source Well 4A NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF29
Marine Corps Palms
* Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Aprtl4_0SD11 "Umit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page90f28
Installation EPA Date~ OW Source Sample Collection Sampling Expected Regulatory Pe~hlorate Samplingl
Service N State R' Sampling (Surface or L' PI d Date of Next D' CO d Sampling Results A I . I M d Comments or References
arne eglon Conducted Groundwater) ocatlon anne Sampling mer Ite (ppb) na ytica etho
NMaVYI C pMAIGTF 29 CA 9 6/12/2002 Ground Water Source Wall4A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
anne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF29 CA 9 12/1112002 GroundWater Source Well 4A NO Federal; State NO EPA314

Manne Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 BI28/1997 Ground Water Source Well SA NO Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF29
. C PICA 9 1211212001 Ground Water Source Wall5A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
· C PICA 9 6/12/2002 Ground Water Source Wall5A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C Palm CA 9 12111/2002 Ground Water Source Wall5A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Manne orps s
NMaVYI C pMAIGTF 29 CA 9 8/28/1997 Ground Water Source Wall6A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
anne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
· C PICA 9 12112/2001 Ground Water Source WeU6A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Manne orps ams
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 6/12/2002 Ground Water Source WalI6A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 1211112002 Ground Water Source Well6A NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 8/2B/1997 GroundWater Source Well 7A NO Federal: State NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
· C PICA 9 1211212001 Groundwater SourceWell7A NO Federal;Slaie NO EPA314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
· C PICA 9 6/12/2002 Ground Water Source Well7A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 1211112002 Ground Water Source Well7A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 B/2811997 Ground Water Source Well BA NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Manne orps ams
Navyl MAGTF 29
. C PICA 9 1211212001 Ground Waler Source Wall8A NO Federal; Stale NO EPA314
Manne orps a ms
Navyl MAGTF 29
· C PICA 9 6/1212002 GroundWater SourreWell8A NO Federal; Slate NO EPA314
Manne orps a ms

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26AprtJ4_0SD11 -Umit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 100f2B
,'<{ii 'I'm ii< ,\;<:iii,) <-?T '<iiTUfNii'>j"/'tW"<;!fU i <liT ,<ii ii", i\Ti'~: ~",.y,;"" ...."" ~f ¥HiiLTi.XNi. <'i"iif ,;~~;;iII;hi(,';;;i, '«i' NT i.Ht ,'''TkV-iiiiiiiii,\·ii.
Oates OW Source Expected Perchlorate

Installation EPA Sample Collection Sampling Regulatory Samplingl
Navyl MAGTF 29 MAGTF 29 Palms is scheduled to re-sample source wells for perchlorate
Marine Corps Palms 2004 calendar year.
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 6/1212002 Ground Water Source Well 9A NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl MAGTF 29
CA 9 12/1112002 Ground Water Source Well 9A NO Federal; Slate ND EPA314
Marine Corps Palms
Navyl PENSACOLA NTTC Drinking Water

FL 4 212712001 Ground Waler NO Federal ND EPA314
Marine Corps NAS Plant
Navyl CORONADO SERE Camp Backup

CA 9 1/18/2003 Ground Water NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps NAVBASE Well

CA 9 5n/2oo3 Ground Water NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
NAB Coronado, SERE Camp: Drinking water wells that pull ground water
to serve the base. Site is a small training base in the East part of San
CA . 9 11n12oo3 Ground Water NO Federal; State NO EPA314 Diego County. NASNI Site 9: Sampling for perchlorate was performed
due to interest by the State regulatory agencies and not due to any
specific requirmenl.
Navyl CORONADO
CA 9 1/1812001 Ground Water SERE Camp Main Well NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps NAVBASE
Navyl CORONADO
CA 9 5n12oo3 Ground Water SERE Camp Main Well NO Federal; State NO EPA314
Navyl CORONADO
CA 9 11n12003 Ground Water SERE Camp Main Well NO Federal; State NO EPA 314
Navyl PATUXENT
MD 3 112912002 Ground Water Point of Entry Bldg 525 NO Federal NO EPA 314
Marine Corps RIVERNAS
Navyl PATUXENT
MD 3 112912002 GfOund Water Point of EnlTy Bldg 526 NO Federal NO EPA 314
Marine Corps RIVERNAS
Navyl ELCENTRO Outflow from drinking

CA 9 311312001 Surface Water NO State NO EPA 314 Input to drinking water plant is Colorado River water.
Marine Corps NAF water plant
Commander
Navyl U.S. Naval Groundwater Monitoring
GU 9 1011212003 Ground Water NO Federal NO EPA 314
Marine Corps Forces, Well#NCS3
Marianas
Commander
Navyl U,S. Naval Groundwater Monitoring
GU 9 41612003 Ground Water NO Federal NO EPA314
Marine Corps Forces. WeIl#NCS 5
Marianas
Commander
Navyl U.S. Naval Groundwater Monitoring
GU 9 1011212003 Ground Water NO Federal ND EPA314
Marine Corps Forces, well#NCS6
Marianas .
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPOES_26Apr04_0S011 -Umit of detection by method 314 as staled by laboratory,
Sheet: UCMR and Prinklng Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 11 of28
Dates DWSource
I I I I Per~hlorale I
Service I
Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Sampling
Conducted
(Surface or
Groundwater) I Sample Collection
Location
Sampling Expected Regulatory Samplingl
PI d Date of Next D' Cit d samphng Results A I • I M thod I
anne Sampling nver e (ppb) na ytlea e
Navyl
Commander
IU'S' Naval
Marine Corps Forces,
GU 9 10/1212003 Ground Water I
Groundwater Monitoring
\Nell. NCS 7
I I I I I
NO Federal NO EPA314
rt all Commander U.S. Naval Forces, Marianas sites, concenlration
results were less than the detection limit. So these results were reported
as "0". (ND)
Mananas
Navyl
Commander
IU's. Naval
Marine Corps Forces, I GU
1
9
I 121712003
I Ground Water
I
Groundwater Monitoring I
WeIl'NCS9
NO I I Federal I NO I EPA 314
Marianas
---
Navyl
Commander
IU'S' Naval
Marine Corps Forces, I I I
GU 9 101612003
I Ground Water
I
Groundwater Monitoring I
WeIl.NRMC 1
NO J 1 Federal I NO I EPA 314
Marianas
---
Navyl
Commander
IU'S' Naval
Marine Corps Forces, I GU
I
9
I 313112003
I
Ground Water
I
Groundwa1er Monitoring I
Well' NRMC 2
Marianas
---
Navyl ICommander
U.S. Naval
Marine Corps Forces. I GU
I
9
I 313112003
I Ground Water
I Groundwater Monitoring
Well.NRMC3
I
Marianas
Navyl
Commander
IU'S' Naval
Marine Corps Forces, I I I
GU 9 1012612003
I Ground Waler
I Groundwater Monitoring I
WeIl.NCSA
NO I , Federal I NO I EPA314
Marianas
---
C-ommander
Surface Water (Clearwell,
Navyl IU's. Naval

Marine Corps Forces,
GU 9 313112003 Surface Water Fena Water Trealment
I NO I I Federal I NO I EPA314
Plant)
Martanas
Navyl 'Navy Public Peart Harbor Drinking
M' C IWor1<S Cenler, HI 9 5T712oo2 Ground Water Water System· Halawa

I NO I I Federal; State I NO I EPA314
anne orps Peart Harbor Pump Station
I I
I I I
NavyI Navy Public Peart Harbor Drinking
M C IWOr1<S Center, HI 9 51712002 Ground Water Water System· Red Hill I

N.O I IFederal; State I NO I EPA314
anne orps Peart Harbor Pump Slation
I I
I I I
NavyI Navy Public Peart Harbor Drinking
M C IVVor1<S Cenler, HI 9 51712002 Ground Water Water System· Waiawa I

NO I I Federal; Slate I NO I EPA 314
anne orps Peart Harbor Pump Station
Navyl ILEMOORE
Marine Corps NAS I I I
CA 9 211212003
I Surface Water I Drinking Water
Trealrnent Plant Effluent NO State NO EPA314
NAS Lemoore. There are no ranges, no demolition and no exposure to
the chemicals in the minilions @ Lemoore. There is no reason to suspect
Bldg 722 there is soil or groundwater contamination.
Navyl ILEMOORE
CA 9 5/14/2003
Treatment Plant Effluent NO Slate NO EPA 314
Bldg 722
Navyl ILEMOORE
CA 9 812012003
Trealrnent Plant Effluent I
Bldg 722
NO I I State I NO I EPA314
Drinking Water
Trealrnent Plant Effluent

State I NO I EPA314
Bldg 722
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26AprD4_0SD11 ""l.imit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboralory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water + J value is statistical estimate Page 12 of 28
. .",.y'"" ., ,."
,.tiKi.·. ti..i.1. . . ;.:tlO".· +g . 'ii .··...n:!;•. ;,} .'J%')Ji"'><>'"' '."'' 'h . :, t\;:';".l,.:" SIJe 'h 'T;
·V::>i .,,:;:; ·).;'*i.\iyJ9····;.Yii.WJY·.p"f·(}·.,·. .. }; •./'"
Dates OW Source Expected Perchlorate
Inslallation EPA Sample Collection Sampling Regulatory Samplingl
Service Slate Sampling (Surface or Date of Next Sampling Results Comments or References
Tap 01 - Water
Navyl Navy Public
IL 5 2/1012003 Surface Water Treatment Plant Effluent, NO Federal <4" EPA 314
Marine Corps Works Center
8uilding 12
Navyl BANGOR
WA 10 512812003 Ground Water Chlorination 8.7009 YES t2l2612003 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps NAVSU8ASE
Navyl BANGOR
WA 10 512812003 Ground Water Chlorination 8.7051 YES 1212612003 Federal: State NO EPA314
Marine Corps NAVSU8ASE
Navy Public
Navyl WTP 1, NAS JAX Federal;
Works Center FL 4 2/1012003 Ground Water NO NO EPA 314
Marine Corps (2161212) State; local
Jacksonville
Navy Public
Navyl WTP 2, NAS JAX Federal:
Works Center FL 4 211012003 Ground Water NO NO EPA 314
Marine Corps (21612t2) State: Local
Jacksonville
A second round of samples were taken Navy Public Works Center

Jacksonvilleon July 22 and 23, 2003, in accordance with the EPA's UCMR
Navy Public
Navyl WTP, NS MAYPORT Federal; data call for new contaminants. The second round of sampling was found
Works Center FL 4 211012003 Ground Water NO ND EPA 314
Marine Corps (2160734) State: Local to have the same "non-detect" results. The same EPA method (314.0)
Jacksonville
was used, all levels of detect and reporting were the same. Until further
notice, there is no intent to sample for perchlorate at these locations.
NAVAIRWPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 1013/2003 Surface Water SNI . Zitnic Spring YES 01110/2004 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRWPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 11/18/2003 Surface Water SNI . Zitnic Spring YES 01/1012004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA
Survey include responses for both NAWS China lake and NOLF San
Nicolas Island. China Lake is l<><;ated in California's Mojave Desert in a
dry lake (playa) environment. USGS has tested nearby Searles lake
NAVAIRWPNS Sample collected
Navyl using EPA 314 and detected high concentrations of naturally occuring
TACHINA CA 9 10123/2003 from raw water at SNI-SWTP (Raw) YES 1211012003 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps perchlorate in the evaporite deposits found there. Some of the perchlorate
LAKE CA SWTP
detections at China lake may be due to naturally occulTing perchlorate.
The Federal Facilily Identification Number (FFIO) for San Nicolas Island
is: CA7170090206.
NAVAIRWPNS Sample collected

Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 11/18/2003 from raw water at SNI·SWTP (Raw) YES 12/10/2003 Federal: State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA SWTP
NAVAIRWPNS Sampled collected

Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/2312003 as finished water SNI-SWTP (treated) YES 12/10/2003 Federal: State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA from SWTP i
NAVAIRWPNS Sampled collected
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 11/1812003 as finished water SNI-SWTP (treated) YES 12110/2003 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA from SWTP
"Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Aprtl4_0SD11 "Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboralory.
i i.;' '··ii;;.},} i·.i·, .·. ·X· iii· i"i .i i .' . d,i.i't~ ,li-~t!ili1;., iiii ,ii;, ii Y, . . ii ." i' ii .:lilh "',ii' ,'., , i . " " ' i : n ,
·.i.
,5."Y':::Y; "'lHiiiY,li«ili ,,~1iJii,[;t8;; 'i S Ii}:
Ii .i.
.,i}! '.iU;! 'i<Ti. i:£W' i' ?H, ./.9:; ,i? , ~i;';g;;S;XiSii%,i@!';ii[i;;;;~~~;;;;j!li;;[;;'iii!i;i;;\a i:{:;i'i~:i:;:':lr).!;.!r,;;>~[i;ii'icii;;it~;;;;;;;~;;;;;:,"':
••
i:i" ii",'WAy'i'M,' ni
Dates DWSource Expected Perchlorate
Installation EPA Sample Collection Sampling Regulatory Sampling!
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/23/2003 SUlface Water SM-Thousand Springs YES 12/1012003 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 11/1812003 Surface Water SNI-Thousand Springs YES 12110/2003 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 1012312003 Surface Waler SNI-llVindmili Spring YES 01110/2004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 11/1812003 Surface Waler SNI-llVindmili Spring YES 01/1012004 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAJRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 101112003 Ground Waler Well 15 YES 07/01/2004 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/112003 Ground Water Well 18 YES 0710112004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/1/2003 Ground Water Well 25 YES 07/0112004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navy/
TACHINA CA 9 10/2/2003 Ground Water Well 27 YES 07/0112004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKE CA
NAVAIRWPNS
Navy/
TACH1NA CA 9 10/1/2004 Ground Water Well 28 YES 07/0112004 Federal; Stale NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAtRVllPNS
Navy/
TACHINA CA 9 101212003 Ground Water Well 30 YES 0710112004 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAlRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/212003 Ground Water Well 31 YES 07101/2004 Federal; State NO EPA314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRWPNS
Navy/
TACHINA CA 9 10/112003 Ground Waler Well SSl YES 07/0112004 Federal; State NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAIRVllPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 101112003 Ground Waler Well SS3 YES 07/01/2004 Federal; Slate NO EPA 314
Marine Corps
LAKECA
NAVAlRWPNS
Navyl
TACHINA CA 9 10/1/2003 Ground Water WellSV YES 07/01/2004 Federal; Stale NO EP 1096
Marine Corps
LAKECA
Anny Perchlorate Survey - UCMR and Drinking Water
ARMY Fort Huachuca PZ. 9 9130/2003 GW point of entryiwell head yes 3124/2004 UCMR < 1 ppb EPA314 MRL is 1 ppb (6 well heads leanding to !he point of entry were sampled)
SPIA monitoring wells

and Well 0-1 (transient EPA request to sample Impact Area monitoring wells and neamy
ARMY Fort Devens 'MA 1 nla GW Yes Apr-04 EPA request nla nla
noncommunity supply transient noncommunity supply well 0·1
weill
• Me!hod 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb

File; Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26ApI04_0S011 *"Limit of detection by me!hod 314 as staled by laboratory.
Sheet UCMR and Drinking Water ~J value is statistical estimate Page 14 of 28
i > /iR . · .... ."ie/:. .;;.;. . ;i'.' ., . . . . . . "'. . ·iii · ·i ·.,•.·.·i. .
i i"~ ·.·ii' .i....i·;;i",.;i~.;~!;.~'~ii~ -~'":~ . ""

/ • . Hi,· /
. . . . ci. . . i 'iike . i i .f
if .j,t;'. . i.·i~i; ·ii";i;: . ;' . ";...;/i ';i '1 .,.., ~~gr!~'t 'Y'iimi ;;/;j;!IJt\i t\';\i;/; ·iii;·· . ;>;·.·'0'! .•". ..•·.;i;.i·;;·'i!;f;ii'iJ;';lfi".i,~;·· i,'.i;~;t;ii;]l.i;.
ii.\·c· '''-,., "ii
Service State Sampling (Surface or Date of Next Sampling Results Comme'nts or References
Conducted Groundwater) sampling (ppb)
Virginia
Radford Army Department of EPA 314.0 and
raw water intakes at two Requested and received approval from HQDA to sample for perchlorates
ARMY Ammunition VA 3 nla SW Yes lbd Environmental nla lCIMSIMS
Drinking water plants at drinking waler plant intakes
Plant Resources verification
request
Fort George Water plant -plant tap,

ARMY MD 3 10/1612002 GW/SW yes quarterly UCMR <4.0· EPA 314-M
Meade point of entry
Fort George Water plant -plant tap.
ARMY MD 3 01/1312003 GW/SW yes quarterly UCMR <4.0' EPA 314-M
Meade point of ent'Y
Fort George Water plant -plant lap,
ARMY MO 3 419/2003 GW/SW yes quarterly UCMR <4.0' EPA 314-M
Fort George Water plant -plant tap.
ARMY MD 3 713/2003 GW/SW yes quarterty UCMR <4.0· EPA 314-M
Water plant -plant tap, lab detection limit = 4 ugll; plant closed for repairs dUring first half of
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 121412001 SW yes Sep-02 UCMR <4.0.. . EPA 314-M
point of enIfY 2002
Water plant -plant tap,
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 9/1112002 SW yes Oet-02 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0
point of entry
Water plant .plant tap,
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 1013012002 SW yes Apr-03 UCMR <4.0· EPA 314.0
point of entry
Water plant -plant tap,
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 4/25/2003 SW yes Jun-03 UCMR <4.0.. . EPA 314.0
point of entry
Water plant -plant lap,
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 6/30/2003 SW yes Sep.03 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0
point of entry
none - plant
Water plant -plant lap,
ARMY Fort Monroe VA 3 913/2003 SW no closed on 26 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0
point of entry
Sep 03
ARMY FortOix NJ 2 1212002 GW well head yes quarterty UCMR <4.0' EPA 314-M
ARMY FortOix NJ 2 0212003 GW well head yes quarterly UCMR <4.0· EPA 314-M
ARMY FortDix NJ 2 0512004 GW well head yes quarterty UCMR <4.0' EPA 314-M
ARMY FortOix NJ 2 0812004 GW well head yes quarterty UCMR <4.0· EPA 314-M
ARMY Fort Drum NY 2 10/29/2003 GW well head yes 01104104 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314-M
water treatment plant;
ARMY Fort Benning GA 4 10/2112002 SW yes 2/24/2003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
filtration
ARMY Fort Benning GA 4 2124/2003 SW yes 0512003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD·WPB
filtration
ARMY Fort Benning GA 4 05/2003 SW yes 818/2003 UCMR <4.0· EPA314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
filtration
ARMY Fort Benning GA 4 8/812003 SW no nla UCMR <4.0' EPA314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
filtralion
Surface Water Plant and

ARMY Fort Gordon GA 4 4/112003 GW/SW yes 611012003 UCMR <4.0' EPA314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
Range Control well

ARMY Fort Gordon GA 4 6/10/2003 GW/SW yes 91912003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
Range Control well

ARMY Fort Gordon GA 4 91912003 GW/SW yes 1219/2003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD-WPB
Range Control well

ARMY Fort Gordon GA 4 121912003
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11

GW/SW
Range Control Well
..
no
~'" , 'H.
nla UCMR
•• A
-Umit of detection by method 314 as slated by laboratory.

<4.0' EPA314.0 Sampling and analysis conducted by GA EPD·WPB
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is stalistical eslimate Page 15 of 28

.i~!!':;;';c2! ;~3;";,~>!;;;J J:!~ ·; ti; ; :'j;i;;· / .;.£.i. bl/,; .' c,Lj:l}~S ~l;:"L LJ~~
~t--:>::--:':'~"'i
>1
,': - :::i':~',: ':;;;;;,>~:;.:"jj::'
.;2.
·;)~t\,
i'
:I::{:\<: -.:p.p, -,i:";·"
.'X, ."·lj·j~l;;:jC';j.''';::
A/i/' "A
.: .:k·.;>.• ·/:l:;~:;!l~.i.i•.i!'.T:;c"i.;I:>Q~i
;;;;;;/;;" (iT';;i;...
.: ; J!!";; ;[.J:!; ;,;.;'!. .. ." i,·i/k, .•4'"
c,·;•. .:. .;·.•. i.; ; .+x ·.•
A, 'j:';;;;;; i""!!": !!i;, i..; i .i
Dates OW Source
Sampling
Expected Perchlorate .
Installation EPA Sample Collection Regulatory Samplingl
Hunter Anny
ARMY GA 4 None ·GW drinking water wells yes tbd UCMR nla EPA314.0 Planned for future operations
Air1ield
Planned for
ARMY Fort Stewart GA 4 None GW drinking water wells future Not known UCMR nla EPA314.0 Planned for future operations
operations
ARMY Fort Riley KS 7 5/1612002 GW water plant intake yes 1116/2002 UCMR <4.0'" EPA314
ARMY Fort Riley KS 7 111612002 GW water plant intake no not required UCMR <4.0' EPA 314
Fort Leonard
ARMY KS 7 8/112002 SW SWtreatment plant yes 11121/2002 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314
Wood
Fort Leonard
ARMY KS 7 1112112002 SW SW treatment plant yes 31112003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314
Wood
Fort Leonard
ARMY KS 7 3/1/2003 SW SWtreatment plant yes 6/112003 UCMR <4.0' EPA 314
Wood
Fort Leonard
ARMY KS 7 6/112003 SW SW treatment plant no not required UCMR <4.0' EPA 314
VVood
Aberdeen MDE Advisory Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
ARMY Proving MD 3 11/1212002 GW Finished water Yes 1111912002 level in <1 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG trating field. APG and City
Ground finished water alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is

Aberdeen MDE Advisory GWemanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY Proving MD 3 11119/2002 GW Finished water Yes 11126/2002 level in 0.61J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Ground finished water
+ J value is a statistical estimate
Aberdeen MDE Advisory GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY Proving MD 3 11/2612002 GW Finished water Yes 121312002 level in 0.61J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+J value is a statistical estimate
Aberdeen MDE Advisory GW emanating from aqUifer under APG \raiing field. APG and City
ARMY Proving MD 3 121312002 GW Finished water Yes 12110/2002 level in 0.76J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection MRL is 1 ppb.
ARMY Proving MD 3 12/10/2002 GW Finished water Yes 12/1712002 level in < 1 ppb EPA314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
'.
Aberdeen MOE Advisory Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
ARMY Proving MD 3 12/17/2002 GW Finished water Yes 1212612002 level in < 1 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG \rating field. APG and City

Aberdeen MDE Advisory GWemanating from aqUifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY Proving MD 3 1212612002 GW Finished water Yes 12131/2002 level in 0.60J ppb+ EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
• Method 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb'

File: Consolidated Servir.es_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 "limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Service
I Installation
Name I I I EPA Dates
Stale Re ion Sampling
g Conducted
I OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling
Regulatory
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
(ppb)
Samplingl I
Analytical Method
II I
Aberdeen MDE Advisory GW emanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving MD 3 12131/20021 GW Finished water Yes 1f712oo3 level in 0.61J ~pb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Aberdeen I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
I I
MDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving
Ground I I I
MD 3 11712003 GW Finished water
I I Yes 1/1412003 level in
finished water
" 1 ~pb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
ARMY I
Aberdeen
Proving
Ground II I I I
MD 3 1/1412003 GW Finished water
I I
I Yes 1/2112003
MOE AdviSOryl
level in
finished waler
0.59J ~pb +
I EPA 314-M
rwemanating from aquifer under APG traHng field. APG and City
altemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Aberdeen
II I I I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
GW emanating from aquifer under APG t,aiing field. APG and City
I
MOE Advisory
ARMY I Proving
Ground I MD
3 112112003 GW Finished water
I Yes 1/2812003 level in
finished water
0.70J ~pb+ EPA 314-M altemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a stat~stical estimate
II I I I I
MOE Advisory
I
ARMY Proving
Ground
I Yes 21412003 level in
finished water
"1 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
allemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
I
II I I I
Aberdeen Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
I I
MDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving MD 3 21412003 GW Finished waler Yes 211112003 level in < 1 ppb
EPA 314-M GW emanating from aqUifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
Ground finished water altemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Aberdeen I MDE Advisory

Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water SOurce is
GW emanating from aquifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
ARMY I ProVing
Ground II I I I
I I Yes 211912003 level in
finished water
0.86J ppb + EPA 314-M altemale sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Aberdeen MOE Advisory

ARMY I Proving MD 3 2/1912003 GW Finished water Yes 2125/2003 level in 1.0 p~b EPA 314-M Detected at limit of MDE advisory. MRL is 1 ppb
ARMY I Proving MD 3 2125/2003 GW Finished water Yes 3/4/2003 level in < 1 p~b EPA 314-M GWemanating from aquifer under APG traHng field. APG and City
I
II I I I
ARMY I Proving
Ground
finished water
"1 p~b EPA 314-M GW emanating from aqUifer under APG traiing field. APG and City

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 "Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 170f28
S""'ice I
Installation
Name
I I I EPA Dates
State Re ion Sampling
g Conducted
I ow Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling
Regulatory
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
(ppb)
Samplingl I
Analytical Method

MOE Advisory GW emanating from aquifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
II I I
Aberdeen
ARMY J Proving MD 3 3/11/2003 GW Finished water Yes 3/1812003 level in 0.39J ppb + EPA 314-M allemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
ARMY
Aberdeen
I Proving
Ground II I I I
I I
IYes 3/25/2003
MDE AdViSOryl
level in
finished water
0.50J ppb +
I EPA 314-M
IGW emanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. water source is
I I I I
Aberdeen MDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving
Ground 1
I Yes
I 411/2003 level in
fmished water
< 1 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
JMDE Advisory Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
II I I I I
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving
Ground
finished water
0.8 ppb EPA 314-M GWemanating from aquifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
Aberdeen
II I I I I I I MDE AdViSOryl
\Gwemanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MD 3 418/2003 GW Finished water Yes 4115/2003 level in
finished water
O.34J ppb +
I EPA 314-M altemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
ARMY I
Aberdeen
Proving
Ground 1I I I I
MD 3 4/15/2003 GW Finished water
I I
I Yes 4/22/2003
MDE AdViSoryl
level in
finished water
0.40J ppb +
I EPA 314-M
Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. water source is
IGwemanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
1MDE Advisory Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
I I
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving
Ground II j I I
MD 3 4/22/2003 GW Finished water Yes 4/29/2003 level in
finished water
< 0.5ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG lraiing fl81d. APG and City
I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
II I I I
Aberdeen
I I
MDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving MD 3 4/2912003 GW Finished water Yes 51612003 level in < 0.5 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY I
Aberdeen
Proving
Ground I I I
MD 1 3 51612003 GW
1
Finished water
I I Yes 5/1312003
r DE
AdViSOryl
level in
finished water
0.45J ppb +
I EPA 314-M
Finished Drinking waler sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
\Gwemanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City

MOE Advisory GWemanating from aquifer under APG trating field. APG and City
II I I I
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving
Ground
I Yes
1
5/20/2003 level in
finished water
0.48J ppb+ EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SDll -Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is slatistical estimate Page 18 of 28
Service I
Inslallation
Name
I I I EPA Dates
Slate Re ion Sampling
g Conducted
I OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date ofNext
Sampling
Regulatory
Driver Cited
pe~hlOfate I Samplingl
SamPI;;:b~esults Analytical Method I Comments or References
II I I
ARMY I Proving MD 3 5/20/2003 GW Finished water Yes 512712003 level in 0.5ppb EPA 314-M GWemanafing from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City
I I I
Aberdeen Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
II I I
IMDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving MO 3 5/2712003 GW Finished water Yes 6/312003 level in < 04ppb EPA 314-M GWernanafing from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City
I I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
II I
Aberdeen GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
I I I
MDE AdViSOryl
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MD
3
1
61312003
I GW Finished water Yes 6/1012003 level in
finished water
< 0.4J ppb + EPA 314-M altemate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a stafistical estimate
II I I I
Aberdeen GWemanating from aquifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
I I
MDE Advisory
ARMY I Proving
MD 3 6110/2003 GW Finished water Yes 6/17/2003 level in 0.61J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
Ground finished waler
+ J value is a stafisfical esfimate
ARMY I Proving MD 3 6/17/2003 GW Finished water Yes 6/24/2003 level in < 0.5ppb EPA 314-M GW emanating from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving MD 3 612412003 GW Finished water Yes 7/1/2003 level in <0.5ppb EPA 314-M GWemanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
Aberdeen
II I I I I I I Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is

!Gwemanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
I
MDE AdViSOIYI
ARMY I Proving MD 3 7/1/2003 GW Finished water Yes 71812003 level in 0.30J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sarnple coIlecfion. MRl is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a stafisfical eslimate
II I I I I I
MDE Advisory GWemanating from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving MD 3 71812003 GW Finished water Yes 7/15/2003 level in

0.57 J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 PPb.
+ J value is a stafistical esfimate
I
II I I I I I
ARMY I Proving MD 3 7/15/2003 GW Finished water Yes 7/2212003 level in < 0.5 ppb EPA 314-M GW emanafing from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City
I I
I I
Aberoeen
II I I I I
MDE AdViSOryl
Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. Waler source is
ARMY I Proving MD 3 7/2212003 GW Finished water Yes 7129/2003 level in < 0.5 ppb EPA 314-M GWemanafing from aquifer under APG !raiing field. APG and City

File: Consolidated Serviees_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 -Umil of detecfion by method 314 as slated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical esfimate Page 19 of 28
Service I
Installation
Name
I I I EPA
State R ion
eg
Dates
Sampling
Conducted
I OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
Location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling
RegutatoJY
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
(ppb)
Sampling/
Analytical Method

Aberdeen MOE Advisory GWemanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving
Ground 1
MD
I I I
3 7129/2003 GW Finished water Yes 8/512003 level in
finished waler
0.50 J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a statistical esUmate
Aberdeen
IGwemanaung from aquifer under APG \raiing field. APG and City
II I I I I I I
MOE AdViSOryl
ARMY I Proving MD 3 8/5/2003 GW Finished water Yes 8/14/2003 level in O.54Jppb + EPA 314-M altemate sample collecUon. MRL is 1 ppb.
Ground finished waler
II I I I
Aberdeen
I I
rw emanaUng from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
I
rOE AdViSOry!
ARMY I Proving
MD
3 8/14/2003 GW Finished water Yes 8/19/2003 level in 0.40 Jppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
I Finished Drinking waler sampled for City of Aberdeen. Water source is
I I I I I
Aberdeen rw emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
I I
MOE AdViSoryl
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MD
3 8/1912003 GW Finished water Yes 8/26/2003 levetin
finished water
0.34 J ppb +
I EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a statisUcal estimate
Aberdeen I
MDE Advisory
GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving
Ground II I I I
finished water
0.50J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
+ J value is a statisUcal estimate
II I I I
MOE Advisory
ARMY I Proving
Ground
I I Yes 9/16/2003 level in
finished water
< O.SOppb EPA 314-M GW emanaUn9 from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving MD 3 9/16/2003 GW Finished water Yes 912412003 level in <1 EPA 314-M GWemanaUng from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving MD 3 912412003 GW Finished water Yes 101912003 level in <1 EPA 314-M GWemanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
Ground finished waler alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
II I I I I
Aberdeen rw emanating !rom aquifer under APG traiin91ield. APG and City
I I
MOE AdViSOryl
ARMY I Proving MD 3 1019/2003 GW Finished water Yes 10/14/2003 level in 0.39J ppb + EPA 314-M aiternate sample collecUon. MRL is 1 ppb.
II I
Aberdeen MOE Advisory GW emanating from aqUifer under APG lraiing field. APG and City
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MD
I 3 10/14/2003\ GW Finished water
finished water
0.50J ppb + EPA 314-M alternate sample collecUon. MRL is 1 ppb.

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 -Umit of detecUon by method 314 as staled by laboratory.
Service I
Installation
Name
I IEP
State R i:n
eg
I Dates
Sampling
Conducted
I OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling
Regulatory
Driver Cited
Perchlorate
Sampling Results
(ppb)
Samplingl I
Analytical Method
Finished Drinking water sampled for City of Aberdeen. water source is

MDE Advisory GW emanating from aquifer under APG Iraiing field. APG and City
II I
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving MD 3 10121120031 GW Finished water Yes 1012812003 lavelin 0.37J ppb+ EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL;s 1 ppb.
I I
GW emanating from aquifer under APG traiing field. APG and City
II I I I
Aberdeen 11104103 & MDE AdViSOryl
ARMY I Proving
Ground
I I Yes weelkly level in
thereafter finished water
0.21J ppb +
I EPA 314-M alternate sample collection. MRL is 1 ppb.
I I I
Production wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. Wells 7, 8, 9, and 10
ARMY I
Aberdeen
Proving
Ground II I I
MD I 3
612002
present
GW Well head for City
Production (CAP) well 1
Yes
--:eekly unti~1 MDE Advisory
mId 2003, bl' level in
wee:y sInce finished water
NO EPA 314-M
are located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
10.
en INOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb - 1ppb MRL was started in
July 23, 2002. NO is < MRL
Aberdeen
II I I Well head for City

I I
weekly untill MDE Advisoryi
Production wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. wells 7. 8, 9, and 10
lare located on ins1allation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
10.
I
612002 mId 2003, bl' level in
ARMY I Proving MD 3
present
GW
Production CAP 2
Yes
y
NO EPA 314-M
Ground 1 1 wee: SInce finished waler
en INOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb . 1ppb MRL was started in
July 23, 2002. ND is < MRL
Aberdeen I I I
weekly bi. MDE Ad'~'SOry
2003,untill
lare located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
II I I I I I
6/2002 Well head for C,ity mid 10.
ARMY I Proving MO 3 GW Yes . level,n ND to 1.8 ppb EPA 314-M
Ground
present Production CAP 3
wee~~lnce finished water
I NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb • 1ppb MRL was started in
I I IProduction wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. Wells 7, 8, 9, and 10
II I I
are located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
I
Aberdeen
I
weekly untill MDE Advisoryl
6/2002 Well head for City 10.
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MO
3
present
GW
I Production CAP 4
Yes mid 2003, bl'
wee~ Since
en
level in
finished water
NO EPA 314-M
INOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb • 1ppb MRL was started in
I Production wells that suppty the City of Aberdeen. Wells 7,8, 9, and 10
II I I I
weekly untill MOE Advisory lare located on installallon. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9.
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MO
3
612002"
present
GW
Well head for City
Production CAP 5
I Yes
mid 2003, bi·
weekly since
then
level in
finished water
ND EPA 314-M
10.
(NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb. 1ppb MRL was started in
Aberdeen I weekly untill MDE Advisory

lare located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, g,
ARMY I Proving
Ground II I I I
MD 3
612002
present
GW
Well head for City
Production CAP 6
I Yes
mid 2003, bi·
weekly since
then
(evelin
finished water
ND EPA 314-M
10.
(NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb. 1ppb MRL was started in
I weekly untill MDE Advisory IProduction wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. wells 7, 8, 9, and 10
are located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3. 6. 9,
II I I
Aberdeen
ARMY I Proving
Ground
MD 3
612002
present
I GW
Well head for City
Production CAP 7
I Yes
mid 2003, bi·
weekly since
then
level in
finished water
ND EPA 314-M
10.
NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb· 1ppb MRL was started in

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Aprt>4_0SD11 -limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
<;',i:i'~~';' :,~:,<;,ri~ .,;;;,I i;,:!!< > !;<.'" i!;;~! '1;;;;18<;;/;,;;);;;;:;,:,;" f~~r)f;! S; )!;i<:N;i,:,i;<:~f:~(; .,;ij': !j'/,;i; i'i
;";
;;;wi1 ~a;;;
,J, ""I' , ,,!' t.i
'! i>! ,!!!i
ii'

Production wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. Wells 7, 8,9, and 10
weekly untill are located on instal/ation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9.
Abellleen MOE Advisory
612002 well head for City mid 2003, bl 10.
ARMV Proving MD 3 GW Ves level in ND-1.5ppb EPA 314-M
present Producllon CAP 8 weekly since
then NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb - 1ppb MRL was started in
Producllon wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. wells 7,8,9, and 10
weekly untill are located on installation. Detections have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
612002 well head for City mid 2003, bi 10.
ARMV Proving MO 3 GW Ves level in ND-5ppb EPA 314-M
present Production CAP 9 weekly since
July 23, 2002. NO is < MRL CAP ~ has been occasionally taken offline.
Production wells that suppty the City of Aberdeen. Wells 7, 8, 9, and 10

weekty untill are located on insta"ation. Detec:ions have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
612002 Well head for City mid 2003, bi 10.
ARMV Proving MD 3 GW Ves level in NO - 2.1 ppb EPA 314-M
present ProducUon CAP 10 weekly since
Production wells that supply the City of Aberdeen. wells 7, 8, 9, and 10
weekly untill are located on installaUon. DetecUons have been found in wells 3, 6, 9,
612002 Well head for City mid 2003, bi 10.
ARMV Proving MD 3 GW Ves level in NO EPA 314-M
present Production CAP 11 weekly since
then NOTE: MRL has ranged from 5 ppb to 1 ppb - lppb MRL was started in
NOTE FOR ALL AIR FORCE OATA OSO reque.ttor OW .ource Information reported by
Air Force Perchlorate Survey -
MAlCOMs identifies media sampled, which indudes OW, GW and soiUsedimen!. Some MAlCOMs
UCMR and Drinking Water reported back NIA - NIA has not been defined
Barksdale EPNUCMR;
Air Force LA 6 3/25/03 SW Northgate No N/A <4.0' EPA 3140
AFB state Bar1<sdale does NOT have to do the UCMR sampling per Federal
Barksdale EPNUCMR; requirements. LA DHH produced a letter (non-specific to Bar1<sdale) that
Air Force LA 6 4129103 SW Northgate No N/A <4.0' EPA 314.0
said this sampling would be handled at the water treatment plants.
AFB state
EPNUCMR; However, in typical stale fashion, the letter is very vague. Bar1<sdale has
Air Force Bar1<sdale AFB LA 6 7116103 SW Northgate No NIA < 4.0' EPA314.0 accomplished the sampling anyway. At least we will have them in caSe
state
anyone (whether state or ESOHCAMP inspector) ever asks.
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Bar1<sdale AFB LA 6 10130103 SW Northgate No NIA < 4.0· EPA 314.0
stale
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 712911997 GW Well # 1 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 312212000 GW Well # 1 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 7129/1997 GW Well#2 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 312212000 GW Well#2 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 712911997 GW Well #3 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 312212000 GW Well#4 No NIA NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
• ~ethod 314 reporting limit is 4 ppb'
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SDll -Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking water +J value is statistical estimate Page 22 of 28
Service
Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Dates
Sampling
Conducted
OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
Location
Planned Date
I I per~hlorate Sampling/
of Next D' C't d Sampling Results A Iyti I M h d
Sampling nver I e (ppb) na ca et 0
I Comments or References
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 6/5/2001 GW Well # 5 No N/A ND EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPAlUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 7129/1997 GW Well # 6 No N/A NO EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 312212000 GW Well#6 No N/A ND EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 7/29/1997 GW WeIl#7 No N/A ND EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 3122/2000 GW Well # 7 No N/A NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 7/29/1997 GW Well # 8 No N/A NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPAlUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 3122/2000 GW Well # 8 No N/A NO EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Beale AFB CA 9 7/29/1997 GW Well #9 No N/A NO EPA 300.0
DOHSUCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force BealeAFB CA 9 312212000 GW Well #9 No NIA ND EPA 300.0
DOHS UCMR
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3123199 GW 2 Yes Jan-Mar 04 46 EPA 314.0 Samples taken after chlorination. Resampled
state
EPNUCMR;
Air Force CannonAFB NM 6 4120199 GW 2 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPAlUCMR;
Air Force Cannoo AFB NM 6 4120199 GW 2 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slale of NM
slate
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4119100 GW 2 Yes Jan-Mar 04 5.7 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
slate
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 7/1/03 GW 2 Yes Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
state
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3/23/99 GW 3 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
slate
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4128/00 GW 3 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
slate
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4/1/01 GW 3 Yes Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPA/UCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3/5/02 GW 3 Yes Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
slale
EPA/UCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 2120103 GW 3 Yes Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by stale of NM
slate
EPAlUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3123/99 GW 5 Yes Jan-Mar 04 < 5.0·· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPA/UCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4128/00 GW 5 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
stale
EPA/UCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 2120/03 GW 5 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slale of NM
slate
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4/1101 GW 5 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <4.0· EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
slate
EPA/UCMR; Samples taken after chlorination. Resampled; sampling reqUired by state
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3123/99 GW 7 Yes Jan-Mar 04 21 EPA 314.0
Slale ofNM
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4120199 GW 7 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPA/UCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4120199 GW 7 Yes Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by. slate of NM
state
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Aprtl4_0SDll -Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboralory.
Sh....t· IJCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate
>;;~,~:'.>:"Q) i ; ".../5'; 1Mi;:,.

}i.'
;'"j;!"WiiY; .:w i:;:; '.',"1:2' ·,·x:{\ • Yi<:}W ·.···.WA;;,··,;;~;:ii ,:v:;:;n ';::~;.I.fi;t~ •.i 0; ·f\{; : .; :tw;: :11" ;Ii; i; ·'.· · ;.':; : ; .'·•.x; ;·. ··x;~;;·;"i;.;;,;, . . ,; ,}i,";: 'if
Dates DWSoulCe Expected Perchlorate

Service State Sampling (Surface or Date of Next Sampling Resulta Comments or References
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 4128/00 GW 7 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
slate
EPMJCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 2120103 GW 7 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by stale of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
Jan-Mar 04 <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
Air Force CannonAFB NM 6 3/23/99 GW 8 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 <5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
Jan-Mar 04 < 5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 2120103 GW 8 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 <4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
NrForce CannonAFB NM 6 4/1101 GW 8 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by slate of NM
slate
EPMJCMR;
Air Force CannonAFB NM 6 3/6/02 GW 8 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
slate
EPMJCMR;
Jan-Mar 04 < 5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
NrForce CannonAFB NM 6 6/15100 GW 12 Yes
Jan-Mar 04 < 5.0 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by stale of NM
state
EPMJCMR;
state
EPNUCMR;
Nr Force Cannon AFB NM 6 3/6102 GW 12 Yes
state
EPNUCMR;
state
EPNUCMR;
Air Force Cannon AFB NM 6 515/00 GW 4A Yes
Jan-Mar 04 6.4 EPA 314.0 Sampling required by state of NM
stale
EPMJCMR;
NrForce Cannon AFB NM 6 4/1101 GW 4A Yes
state
EPNUCMR;
slate
EPMJCMR;
slate
Davis-Monthan POE #8, Base Tower
Air Force AZ 9 10/5100 GW No
N/A N/A < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Sampled 5 Oct 00, not mandaled by any state or local aulhority
AFB (Main ResOlvoir)
NrForce ShawAFB SC 4 10/22/03 GW Wellhead" Yes
1211/03 EPMJCMR 4.9
EPA314.0
NrForce ShawAFB SC 4 10122103 GW wellhead'3 Yes
12/1103 EPMJCMR 5.5
EPA 314.0
Nr Force ShawAFB SC 4 10122103 GW Wellhead #4 Yes
12/1103 EPMJCMR < 4.0*
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 10122103 GW Wellhead.5 Yes
12/1103 EPNUCMR <4.0*
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 10122/03 GW Wellhead #6 Yes
1211103 EPMJCMR < 4.0'
EPA314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 10122103 GW Wellhead #7 Yes
1211103 EPAlUCMR 4.2
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 12129/2003 GW Wellhead #1 No
NtA EPMJCMR 5.1
EPA 314.0
NtA EPAlUCMR 5.3
EPA 314.0
N/A EPMJCMR < 4.0'
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 1212912003 GW Wellhead.5 No
N/A EPMJCMR < 4.0'
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 1212912003 GW Wellhead #6 No
N/A EPMJCMR < 4.0·
EPA 314.0
Air Force ShawAFB SC 4 1212912003 GW Wellhead #7 No
N/A EPMJCMR <4.0'
EPA 314.0
Air Force Lackland AFB TX 6 5/1512001 GW WELL#1 Bldg 1013 No

NtA EPAUCMR < 4.0'
EPA 314.0 Entry point

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 ~imil of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
." ·OoD
·SiteSu~
I
~---
Service
Installation
Name
State
EPA
Region
Oates
Sampling
Conducted
OW Source
(Surface or
Groundwater)
Sample Collection
location
Sampling
Planned
Expected
Date of Next
Sampling Driver CIted
I
Perchlorate
Regulat~ry
Samplingl
Sampling Results Analytical Metllod
(ppb)
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 111512001 GW WELL#2 Bldg 5706 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lockland AFB I TX 6 512112003 GW WELL#2 Bldg 5706 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 11/512001 GW WELL#3 Bldg 3106 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 512112003 GW WELL#3 Bldg 3106 No N/A EPAUCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lockland AFB I TX 6 11/512001 GW WELL#4 Bldg 4070 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 5/2112003 GW WELL#4 Bldg 4070 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA314.0 Entry poin.!
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 512112003 GW WELL#5 Bldg 4380 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA314.0 Entry point
Air Force Lackland AFB I TX 6 11/512001 GW WELL#6 Bldg 9062 No N/A EPAUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0 Entry point
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1/16102 SW AVEKUNE No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 7/16102 SW AVEKUNE No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1/16102 SW AVEKSUPPLY No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1/16/2002 GW C-3 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 7/10/2002 GW C-3 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 112412002 GW C-4 No N/A EPNUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 7/1012002 GW C4 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1/1612002 GW NST-l No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 7/1012002 GW NST-1 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1116/02 GW NST·2 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 7110/02 GW NST-2 No NJA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 112412002 GW S-2 No NJA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 71912002 GW S-2 No NJA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 111612002 GW S-3 No NlA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force EdWards AFB I CA 9 71912002 GW S-3 No NJA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1116/02 GW S4 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force EdWards AFB I CA 9 719102 GW 5-4 No NJA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 111612002 GW 5-5 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 71912002 GW S-5 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 1/1612002 GW S-6 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Edwards AFB I CA 9 71912002 GW S-6 No NlA EPNUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force EdWards AFB I CA 9 1/16/2002 GW S-7 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force EdWards AFB I CA 9 9/1812002 GW S-7 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force lwards AFB/AFM CA 9 1/16102 GW A No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force lwards AFB/AFM CA 9 7/16102 GW A No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force lwards AFB/AFM CA 9 7/10/02 SW AVEKSUPPLY No NJA EPNUCMR NO EPA 314.0 I
Air Force lwards AFB/AFM CA 9 1116102 GW B No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Iwards AFB/AFM CA 9 1/16/02 GW C No NJA EPNUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force lwards AFB/AFM CA 9 7/16102 GW C No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Iwards AFB/AFM CA 9 1/16102 GW o No NlA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
Air Force Iwards AFB/AFM CA 9 7/16102 GW o No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
I Hanscom AFB I MA
~!~nn. .J 1;~'~AC~~
Air Force 3/1/01 SW Entry Point No < 4.0' EPA 314.0
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0S011 -Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 25 of 28
<'.' ,;'~T" ';.<>: ;'·:W~.;;C:-/;; /~m~""';' . . ,,:,::::,,: ,"

Dates DWSource Expected Perchlorate
Service Slate Sampling (Surface or Date of Next Sampling Results Comments or References
Air Force HanscomAFB MA 1 6/14101 SW Entry Point No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HanscomAFB MA 1 9fT101 SW Entry Point No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HanscomAFB MA 1 1214101 SW Entry Point No N/A EPAlUCMR <4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HiIlAFB UT 8 10123/2001 GW Well #2, Bldg. 782 N/A N/A EPAlUCMR <4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HiIIAFB UT 8 5/2112002 GW Well #2, Bldg. 782 N/A N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA314.0
Air Force Hi1IAFB UT 8 1012212001 GW 'Nell #8, Bldg. 1570 N/A N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HiIIAFB UT 8 1012312001 GW Well #9. Bldg. 727 N/A NlA EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force HillAFB UT 8 512012002 GW Well #9. Bldg. 727 N/A N/A EPAlUCMR <4.0· EPA 314.0
Air Force Kir1landAFB NM 6 7/2712001 GW Entry Point N/A N/A EPNUCMR ND EPA 314.0
Air Force KirtiandAFB NM 6 112412002 GW Entry Point N/A N/A EPAlUCMR ND EPA 314.0
Wight-
Air Force OH 5 216102 GW Bldg 10855 (EP) Yes Jul-Q2 EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA314.0
Pallerson AFB
Wight-
Air Force OH 5 7/29/02 GW Bldg 10855 (EP) No NlA EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight
Air Force OH 5 2.16102 GW Bldg 10857 (EP) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight
Air Force OH 5 7/29102 GW Bldg 10857 (EP) No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight-
Air Force OH 5 2/6102 GW Bldg 20085A(EP) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight
Air Force OH 5 7/29/02 GW Bldg 20085A (EP) No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight-
Air Force OH 5 2/6102 GW Bldg 20453 (EP) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR 17.2 EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wight
Pallerson AFB
Wright-
Air Force OH 5 2.16102 GW Bldg 30172 (EP) Yes Jul-02 EPNUCMR < 4.0" EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wright
Air Force OH 5 7129102 GW Bldg 30172 (EP) No N/A EPAlUCMR <4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wright
Air Force OH 5 2/6102 GW Bldg 31229 (EP) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Wright
Patterson AFB
Wright-
Air Force OH 5 216102 GW Tap 1 (Area B) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR < 4.0· EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB

File: ConsoHdated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 "Limit of detection by method 314as stated by laboratory.
g ....'..>;.:.I>'·X:.. :· .
>......6:~iiji;;»··.;·1~ .>./.\:! :,~ .• ':u.' >ii. "; ·; . . :;.;\1.·>;t> •. i . i./i<!V...,i<>.;~~~!i;0:i~i >j;i;:i~q!i~i : ·,I";;·,I;.
. Co'" ....;::.::;:;;./
;.,.,.,!.; /Y I:::.a ..:..uou .'i" ,c:, Ci.
. ·.l',·;·':;';.··,·!;?;.;···:. 'f; >li.» .•p·.;,ii;i».i,':;; ..' .f?5•",!/,ii"'!i";!!;". i.ii.;';; · . 'i;; . } ":0i i !.; , ';:Z:,;
\Might-
Air Force OH 5 7129102 GW Tap 1 (Area B) No NIA EPAlUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
\Might JUI-02
Air Force OH 5 216/02 GW Tap 19 (Area C) Yes EPAlUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0
Paltersoll AFB
\Might-
Air Force OH 5 712902 GW Tap 19 (Area C) No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0' EPA 314.0
Palterson AFB
Wight-
Air Force OH 5 2/6102 GW Tap 20 (Area A) Yes Jul-02 EPAlUCMR <4.0' EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
\Might <.4,0·
Air Force OH 5 7129/02 GW Tap 20 (Area A) No N/A EPAlUCMR EPA 314.0
Patterson AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 11/1101 GW San Antonio Wellhead #4 No N/A EPNUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 12/1102 GW San Antonio Wellhead #4 No N/A EPAlUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 5/1103 GW San Antonio Wellhead #4 Yes Nov-01 EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 5/1103 GW San Antonio Wellhead #4 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 1111/01 GW San Antonio Wellhead #5 No N/A EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 1211102 GW San Antonio Wellhead #5 No NIA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314,0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 511103 GW San Antonio Wellhead #5 Yes Nov-01 EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 511103 GW San Antonio Wellhead #5 No N/A EPAlUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 11/1/01 GW San Antonio Wellhead #6 No NlA EPAlUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 12/1102 GW San Antonio Wellhead #6 No NIA EPNUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 5/1/03 GW San Antonio Wellhead #6 Yes Nov-01 EPAlUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 May-03 GW San Antonio Wellhead #6 No NIA EPNUCMR ND EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 Nov-01 GW San Antonio Wellhead #7 No NIA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 Oec-02 GW San Antonio Wellhead #7 No NIA EPAlUCMR ND EPA.314.0

AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 May-03 GW San Antonio Wellhead #7 Yes Nov-01 EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
Vandenberg
Air Force CA 9 May-03 GW San Antonio Wellhead #7 No NIA EPAlUCMR NO EPA 314.0
AFB
SDWA
Geiger Resv & Wellhead

Air Force Fairchild AFB WA 10 3/13/01 GW Yes Aug·01 EPAlUCMR <4.0 314,515.3,524.2,
#2 No furt!>er sampling required it consists of only 2 rounds for data
525.2
collection purposes for fu1ure use if they become Regulated
SDWA Contaminants.
Geiger Resv & Wellhead
Air Force 10 8127101 GW No N/A EPAlUCMR < 4.0 314,515.4,524.2.
Fairchild AFB WA
#2
. .. 525.2
File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26AprQ4_0SD11 "'Limit of detection by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water +J value is statistical estimate Page 27 of28
I I I OW Source
I I I I Per~hlorate
I
Installation EPA Dates Sample Collection Sampling Expected Regulatory Sampling/
Service I Name
State , Re ion Sampling (Surface or
Location PI d Date of Next D' CiledSamplrng Results A Iyti 1M th d Comments or References
g Conducted Groundwater) anne Sampling nver (ppb) na ca e 0
Air Force I Travis AFB I CA 1 9 I 7/16101 I GW I 3-Wellheads I No I N/A I EPMJCMR;

DHS
I <4.0· CADHSlEPA314
1st round of sampling was conducted in Jul 01. 2nd round of sampling
was waived on 4 Sep 02 by DHS, exception of Chromium VI. No further
sampling required it consists of only 2 rounds for data collection purposes
for future use if they become Regulated Contaminants.
. ,. ''f'~I'ilo': ~:.:~;':.'I"

File: Consolidated Services_UCMR and NPDES_26Apr04_0SD11 -Limit of deteclion by method 314 as stated by laboratory.
Sheet: UCMR and Drinking Water + J value is statistical estimate Page 26 of26
-
Unknown
u • .1 • •
From: Kratz. Kurt. Mr, OSD-ATL
Sent: Wednesday, Apri!21. 200408:55
To: Kitchens, Bryan K., DIG DoD
Cc: Meehan, Patrick" Mr, OSD-ATL; Sullivan, Maureen, Ms, OSD-ATL; Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD~
ATL; Miller, Edmund. Mr, OSO-ATL .
Subject: Re: 360349-PERCHLORATE DATA REQUEST TO DOD
Bryan,
We are shooting tor the 22nd. Service AOs say they can do it. But
until we see the final da~a, I would not make promises. may be a
rt
partial reply.
Kuxt
-~---Original Message----
From: Ki~chens, Bryan K., OIG DoD [mailtot
Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2004 g:34 AM
To: Kratz, Kurt, OSD-ATL
Subject: RE: 360349--PERCHLORATE PATA REQUEST ~o DOD
Si.r, Please see my original email below. Thank,,!
Bryan
·----Origina~ Message----
from: Kitchens, Bryan K., OIG DoD
Sent: Thursday, Ap~il 15, 2004 11:18 AM
To: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL
SUbject: FW\ 360349--PERCHLORATE DATA REQUEST TO DOD
.sir,
Is there a problem in giving this requested info to GAO? Can you let me
know whon you provide the requested into to GAO? Th~nks!
aryan
-----Original Message-----
From, Edward.M &adjura
........
[mailto;~
11111111.
Sent: Th~r~daYI April 15, 2004 10:39 AM

To: _ Kurt, , OSD-ATL
Cc: Christine D Frye; Roderick T Moore: D~vid Noquera
Subject: 360349--PERCHLO~TE DATA REQUEST TO DOD
Kurt:
Attached is a letter from my director, officially requesting the

perchlorate $smpling data. As stated in the letter, we would like to
have this data by April 22, 2004.
If you have any questions, please call me on
Thanks
Ed Zadjura
Assis~ant Director
Page 1of 1
Unknown
From: Reyes, Patricia Catherwood
Sent: Monday, March 29, 20043:31 PM
To: MJller, edmund, Mr, OSD-ATL; Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSO-ArL
Cc:
HI Sandy and Ed,
Attached for your review and discussIon with the Services is the table I put together In response to the MILCON
requirement to report all BRAC perchlorate sampling data to the Congress by 30 Apr". I also have a draft letter
that accompanies the data that I will forward. once Jeff has an opportunity to review it. I would appreciate any
comments on the spreadsheet.
I understand from Maureen that Sandy and Ed are pulling together an all NPDES and UCMR perchlorate data
meeting and thought that the attached data could be part oHnst discussion. Another option would be for us to
discuss the data at the next Emerging Contaminants steering Committee meeting. Note that I have included
"realigned" but not BRAC on the list but this will need to be discu$sed before going final.
Thanks
Patty
7.26.2005
Fort McClellan, AL Soil 10 - 32 Soil - 2 detections / 182 samples analyzed;

Ground Water 1.2 -2.55 Ground Water - 4 detections /38 samples
Surface Water 2.66 analyzed; Surface water - 1 detection /41
samples analyzed. Not detected in 162
subsurface soil and 39 sediment samples.
CA Soil 13 - 106 Range Operations - use ofperchlorate

containing munitions for training purposes.
Pueblo Chemical Depot CO Ground Water Non-Detect - 180 NOTE: TNTMW04 Resampled on 11/29/00
(GW=ND) Excavated soil also sampled
(SOIL=ND)
Savanna Army .Depot IL Ground Water 1.2 - 12.0 Open burn/open detonation
Jefferson Proving Ground IN Soil 27 - 110 Sampling conducted by the Army

Surface Water 0.87 Environmental Center as part of the Range
Assessment Program.
Fort Wingate Depot Activity NM Soil Non-Detect - 3,180 Munition Demil

Ground Water Non-Detect - 2,890
Ravenna Army Ammunition OH Surface Water 7 - 25 Initial sampling ofperchlorates at RVAAP

Plant reuested by Ohio EPA.
Umatilla Chemical Depot OR Ground Water 5 - 9.6 Sampling conducted in the 1990s.
Longhorn Army Ammunition TX Ground Water 1 - 150,000 Source from TNT production and waste
Plant Soil 15 - 45,600 disposal operations.
Surface Water Non-Detect - 905
Red River Army Depot TX Ground Water 6.8 State using Caney Lake as Emergency
Feed watet"tor other lakes. State has
sampled with the Army and found no
Perchlorate in lake.
Camp Bonneville WA Ground Water 5 - 214 6 wells/24 detection.
Former Marine Corps Air CA Ground Water Non-Detect - 398.0 Basewide groundwater is consistent with off-
Station"EI Taro station groundwater concentrations.
Naval Air Station South MA Ground Water 240.0 - 1,935.0 Detections found at Nomans Land Island
Weymouth site.
Marine Corps Air Station, AZ Soil Non-Detect 150 To verify these results an alternate,
Yuma Ground Water 3.3-3.5 definitive, performance based method using
Drinking Water 4.2 Mass Spectormetry technology (e.g., EPA
Surface Water 4.6 Method 8321 {modified} will be performed at
the sampling locations. Verification sampling
will commence the first of Feburary with
sampling results expected the first week of
March 2004
McClellan Air Force Base CA Ground Water Non-Detect 15 Reporting limit 4.0 uglL
Vandenberg Air Force Base* CA Soil Non-Detect - 517 Comihgled in TCE plume
Ground Water
Drinking Water
i
Red River Army Depot TX Ground Water 6.8 State using Caney Lake as Emergency
Feed water for other lakes. State has
sampled with the Anny and found no
Perchlorate in lake.
Camp Bonneville WA Ground Water 5 - 214 6 wellsl24 detection.
Former Marine Corps Air CA Ground Water Non-Detect - 398.0 Basewide groundwater is consistent with off-
Station, EI Toro station groundwater concentrations.
Naval Air Station South MA Grounct Water 240.0 1,935.0 Detections found at Nomans Land Island
~' .,c:{ ",' ,tp'
Weymouth ~)te.
Marine Corps Air Station, AZ Soil Non-Detect - 150 To verify these results an alternate,
Yuma Ground Water 3.3-3.5 definitive, perfonnance based method using
Drinking Water 4.2 Mass Spectonnetry technology (e.g., EPA
Surface Water 4.6 Method 8321 {modified} will be perfonned at
l2l the sampling locations. Verification sampling
:utj will commence the first ofFeburary witfJ
0 sampling results expected the first week of
\0
\0 March 2004
\0
I(~" ;,4
·il.1
McClellan Air Force Base CA Ground Water Non-Detect - 15 Reporting limit 4.0 ugA.
,
Vandenberg Air Force Base* CA Soil Non-Detect - 517 Comingled in TCE plume
Ground Water
Drinking Water
Mr. Bradley L. Baxter
Director of Public Works
City of Rialto
150 South Palm Avenue
Rialto, California 92376
Dear Mr. Baxter:
Thank you for your September 19, 2003 letter to Mr. John Paul Woodley, Jr., the
former Assistant Deputy Under Secretary ofDefense (Environment). As discussed in the
August 21, 2003 meeting, the Department of Defense (DoD) is committed to a
cooperative effort to address perchlorate issues in your region, as expressed in the
statements of intent signed by Mr. Woodley and representatives of the City of Rialto and
Inland Empire.
We were pleased to hear that you were able to acquire the pumps you were
seeking from the Defense Reutilization and Marketing Office through the State points of
contact provided by my staff. I hope that the information on our Strategic Environmental
Research and Development ProgramlEnvironmental Security Technology Certification
Program (SERDPIESTCP) will also be useful to you. I understand that Mr. Woodley, in
his capacity as the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Civil Works), is considering
treatment technology demonstration proposals for the Cucamonga County Water District
(enclosure 1).
The Department is currently in the process of characterizing perchlorate

contamination that might have resulted from DoD activities nationwide under our Interim
Perchlorate Sampling Policy (enclosure 2). For California, the Department recently
proposed a tailored approach, at the request of California Environmental Protection
Agency, for DoD facilities and formerly used defense sites in the state. The approach
proposes sampling, in coordination with an ad hoc workgroup of affected state regulatory
agencies and DoD Components, based on possible risks posed to water supply wells.
Since the City of Rialto, City of Colton, Chino Basin Watermaster, County of San
Bernardino, Fontana Water Company, and West Valley Water District have expressed a
similar interest in groundwater characterization within their regions, I am recommending
that each consider joining the ad hoc group to ensure the broadest representation of
interests in this effort.
. 7
With respect to your request for support from agencies outside the Department,
such as Bureau of Reclamation, Housing and Urban Development, Lawrence Livermore
Laboratory, and the U.S. Geological Survey, those requests should be made directly to
those agencies and organizations.
Lastly, with regard to the former Rialto Ammunition Storage Point (ASP), the
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers is currently conducting research into the histOI)' of the }
Rialto ASP to determine if operations that occurred while the property was in the
possession and under the control of the United States contributed to perchlorate
contamination detected within the area. You have my assurance that the Corps of
Engineers will-~ontinue to coordinate its inquiries and results with the City of Rialto, the
local water quality control board, county water interests, and state and federal regulatory
officials to the extent that it is feasible.
I look forward to our continued collaboration on this issue.
Sincerely,
Patrick J. Meehan, Jr.
Acting Assistant Deputy Under Secretary of Defense
(Environment)
Enclosure
file:///HI/My%20Documents/Enclosure%20I %20&%202.htm
file:/IIHI/My%20Documents/Enclosure%201 %20&%202.htm [10/1/2003 11 :07: 11 AM]

From: Bauermeister Fred
Sent: Monday, June 30,2 1:58 PM
To: Wleszel< Victor Mr OSD-AlL; Patricia Ferrebee
Cc: Sandy Cotter; Kowalczyk Daniel
Subject: {Fwd: Updated 02 Inventory Spread.heet]
Importance: High
RE: Updated 02 AF NPL with Usll!ile 02 SUrveyMilyOJ •
IrNentory Sprea... Jun03 - Waitt... WorkIng File....
Vic and Pat,
Per Sandy's request, please find attached the latest and greatest
spreadsheets for the perchlorate survey and inventory. One tile is the
more complete survey into which we have been compiling information OVer
the past few weeks; the other is a spreadsheet of NPL installations and
the informat~on we have to date conce~nin9 perchlorate sampling,"
resu~ts, e~posure pathways, etc.
As always, if you have any comment or questions, please let me know.
Thanks!
freQ
Unknown
From: Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL
Sent: Friday, June 27, 200312:04 PM
To: 'Bauermeister Fred'
Cc: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col, SAFflE; Ferrebee, Patricia, Ms, OSD-ATL; Cullison, Geoffrey D CIV; Van
Brocklin, Connie H Ms ACSIM; Wieszek, Victor, Mr, OSD-ATL; Carrillo, David, Civ, AFfILEVR;
Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL
Subject: RE: Updated 02 Inventory Spreadsheet
Fred,
Please send completed spreadsheets to both Pat Ferrebee and Vic Wieszek
by
COB Monday. The cover letters and other attachments are now over at
OMB
for coordination. I told them that attachments 4 and 5 would follow on
Monday.
I think we'll have to make a decision to go with what we have, but at a
minimum we want the exposure pathway information for the sites with
concentration data.
As far as I know, we're just missing that information for the Air Force,
is
that correct?
SC
-----Original Message----
From: Bauermeister Fred [mailto:Bauermeister Fred@bah.com]
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 4:36 PM
To: Cotter Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
Subject: Re: Updated 02 Inventory Spreadsheet
Sandy,
Nothing that I know of- the remaining holes in the spreadsheet need to
be
filled
to be complete- even if they are simply "Not Reported" or Awaiting
Results"
or
something of that nature. We need to show that we looked to find the
information, but that it wasn't there ... otherwise, I don't believe
anything
else is needed. If they have any additional information they can
forward it
to
me and fill you in upon your return.
If I don't talk to you before you go, have a great time away!
fred
"Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL" wrote:
> Fred,
> Jeff Cornell said he would work with Dave Carrillo to get additional
> information .... what else do we need?
>
> -----Original Message----

> From: Bauermeister Fred [mailto:Bauermeister Fred@bah.com]
> Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2003 11:11 AM

1
> To: Cotter Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
> Cc: Kowalczyk Daniel
> Subject: Re: Updated 02 Inventory Spreadsheet
>
> Sandy,
>
> The revised installation spreadsheet is attached- ~t includes the
exposure
> pathway information, changes provided by Connie that you forward me
> yesterday,
> and the information for Marine Corps updated yesterday by Geoff.
Geoff
> included
> question marks where he was unsure of the information for that cell
for
> example, if he was unfamiliar whether the installation had used any
> munitions
> containing perchlorate, he inserted question marks. I have left these
cells
> blank for our worksheet, since the question marks would just
clutter ...
>
> I haven't updated the other spreadsheet from what you have, simply
because
> there
> hasn't been any new information ...
>
> Please let me know if you have any questions or comments.
>
> Thanks!
>
> fred
>
> "Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL" wrote:
>
> > Fred,
> > I'm taking vacation next week ... I probably need to have someone here
> monitor
> > while I'm out. We still don't have authorization from Mr. Grone to
send
> out
> > Dingell Solis letter to OMB for coordination. I'll ask the front
office
> > where we are. How are we doing with the spreadsheets?
> >
> > -----Original Message----

> > From: Bauermeister Fred [mailto:Bauermeister Fred@bah.com]
> > Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 2:19 PM
> > To: Cotter Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
> > Cc: Kowalczyk Daniel
> > Subject: Re: Updated 02 Inventory Spreadsheet
> > Importance: High
> >
> > Sandy,
> >
> > Please find attached the second spreadsheet detailing the active
> > installations and sampling status. Please note that those cells
included
> > from other spreadsheets you forwarded are in yellow; those cells I
> consider
> > discrepant or inconsistent with the other spreadsheets I have
highlighted
> > in bright yellow.
> >
> > As always, please feel free to call or email with any questions or
> > comments.
> >
2
> > Thanks!
> >
> > fred
> >
> > "Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL" wrote:
> >
> > > Fred,
> > > This is much better. I expect to get pathway information no later
than
> > > tomorrow COB. Navy and Air Force may provide the information
today.
> > >
> > > -----Original Message----
> > > From: Bauermeister Fred [mailto:Bauermeister Fred@bah.com)
> > > Sent: Friday, June 20, 2003 5:22 PM
> > > To: Sandy Cotter
> > > Cc: Kowalczyk Daniel
> > > Subject: Updated 02 Inventory Spreadsheet
> > > Importance: High
> > >
> > > Sandy,
> > >
> > > Per our discussion, I have updated the attached spreadsheet to
> > > incorporate the information/clarification provided by Dave
Carrillo,
> > > Connie Van Brocklin, and the Navy. While more information may be
> > > forthcoming, I want to forward you a current version for your use.
> > > Those cells highlighted in yellow have been updated.
> > >
> > > I will work to update the Active Installations spreadsheet with
the
> > > information you provided, and will await the pathway information
you
> > > expect from Dave.
> > >
> > > As always, if you have any questions or comments, please let me
know.
> > >
> > > Thanks!
> > >
> > > fred
3
FACILITY NAME HAS FACILITY USED
EQUIPMENT, MUNITIONS
TYPE OF
EQUIPMENT,
I
HAS SAMPLING FOR RESULTS OF ANY
PERCHLORATE SAMPLING,
COMMENTS EXPOSURE PATHWAYS?
OR WEAPONRY BELIEVED MUNITIONS OR OCCURRED? INCLUDING

TO CONTAIN WEAPONRY USED DETECTION
PERCHLORATE LEVEL
ABERDEEN PROVING GROUND Yes Yes 0-23 ppb 23 ppb at the western Yes, Perchlorate has been
boundary well; 1 ppb at the found in drinking supply wells
City of Aberdeen well; GW 3.4 (ND- 5ppb) for the City of
to 10.9 ppb; soil 15 ppb; Aberdeen. Perchlorate has
product well water 0.4 to 5 been detected in the aquifer
ppb. that supplies water to the City
of Aberdeen,
AIR FORCE PLANT 4 Yes I Eiection seats. flares. I Yes NO
AIR FORCE PLANT 14 Not Reported

AIR FORCE PLANT 44 Yes
AIR FORCE PLANT 70 Yes
AIR FORCE PLANT PJKS Yes

ALBANY MCLB Not reported
ALLEGANY BALLISTICS LAB Yes
ANDERSEN AIR FORCE BASE Yes

ANDREWS AIR FORCE BASE No
ANNISTON ARMY DEPOT Not reported
ARDEC (PICATINNY ARSENAL) Yes 19.6 ppb at Open Detonation No known or suspected
Area; 605 ppb in pathway. One GW detection
isolated plume (site 142); of 19.6 ppb in Open
ND on southern boundary
Detonation area and a 605
(Areas K & I).
ppb detection in what is
thought to be an isolated, non
source aquifer. Perchlorate
also sampled at southern
boundary and none found.
ARKANSAS ORO PLANT Not reported

ATLANTIC CITY AIRPORT Not reported
AVCO'LYCOMING SF SITE Not reported
BANGORNSB Yes
BARSTOW MCLB Not reported
BEDFORD NWlRP No
BLAINE NAVAL AMMUNITION Not reported
DEPOT
BRUNSWICK NAS I Yes 1+"/,'/+ '" '" ,""/, Yes I Awaiting Results
CAMP LEJEUNE MCB [ Yes pyre, rockets, GP No I Not Applicable
ordnance, anti-tank
weapons, artillery,
mortars, etc.
CAMP PENDLETON MCB ( Yes IWaiting for HQ I Yes I ND
report identifying
specific eqpt,
munitions, or
weaponry known to
contain perchlorate.
CHERRY POINT MCAS I No (The Air Station I No ~ot Applicable

utilizes
pyrotechnics,
munitions, and
rockets/missiles.
Munitions assembly
is not conducted
aboard the Air
Station other than
the final assembly
efforts required to
ready munitions for
use (i.e. attaching
fins to missles).
COLTS NECK NWS EARLE Yes
I
CONCORDNWS No
CORNHUSKER AAP Not reported
DAHLGREN NSWC Yes
DD SAN JOAQUIN, SHARPE Not reported
FACILITY
DD SAN JOAQUIN, TRACY Not reported
FACILITY
DOVER AIR FORCE BASE No
DSC RICHMOND Not reported
EAU CLAIRE OP #1 Not reported
EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE Yes

I Rocket propellant
testing
EIELSON AIR FORCE BASE I Yes I Demolition & Burn I

No I Not Applicable
Facility
ELLSWORTH AIR FORCE BASE I Yes I EOD Range r Yes r ND

(munitions)
ELMENDORF AIR FORCE BASE ( Yes I EOD Range No Not Applicable
l(mUnitiOnS), Grenades
FAIRCHILD AIR FORCE BASE ( No I Not Applicable No Not Applicable

FORT DIX No
FORT EUSTIS Yes
FORT LEWIS Yes
FORT RICHARDSON No
Not Applicable No
FORT RILEY No
Not Applicable No
FORT WAINWRIGHT No
Not Applicable No
FRANCIS E WARREN AIR FORCE Yes
Mortars, cannons No
BASE
FTCROWDER No
Not Applicable No Not Applicable
HANSCOM AIR FORCE BASE Yes
Pyrotechnics. smoke No Not Applicable
grenades
HILL AIR FORCE BASE I Yes Rocket motor testing Yes 70 ppb
IL ORDNANCE PLT (CRAB Not reported

ORCHARD)
INDIAN HEAD NSWC
TI Yes
IOWA ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT Information Not Available
JACKSONVILLE NAS Yes

JET PROPULSION LAB Yes
JOLIET AAP • KANKAKE~ Information Not available
KEYPORT NUWC Yes
KINGSBURY ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
LAKE CITY AAP Yes
LAKE LOUISE Not reported
LAKEHURST NAWCAD Not reported
LANGLEY AIR FORCE BASE Yes
LARSON AIR FORCE BASE Not reported
LITTLE CREEK NAB Not rel'orted
LONE STAR AAP Yes Unknown. 8 ppb found in GW

by burning grounds and 9 ppb
found next to production bldg.
LONGHORN AAP Yes Yes GW < 4ppbto Perchlorate discovered in No human health exposure
247,000 ppb; 1999. GW treatment for determined. Perchlorate is
Soil 25.5 ppb to perchlorate since March 2001. not approaching drinking
163,000 ppb Eco studies and cleanup
-water sources. Installation
studies being conducted.
has defined nature and extent
of perchlorate contamination
at various locations on
Longhorn property. Nature
and extent of perchlorate
contamination in soil and
groundwater has been
identified. Monitoring of
surface water continues on a
quarterly basis per an
agreement with regUlatory
agencies. No determination of
a Human/Public exposure
pathway has been
determined.
LOUISIANA AAP Not reported
LUKE AIR FORCE BASE No
MALTA TEST STA Not reported
MANCHESTER ANNEX Not reported
MARATHON BAT PLT Not reported
MASSACHUSETIS MILITARY Yes
RESERVATION (MMR}
MCCHORD AIR FORCE BASE No

MCGUIRE AIR FORCE BASE No
MECHANICSBURG SPCC Not reported
MIDDLETOWN AIR DEPOT Not reported
MILAN ARMY AMMUNITION PLANT Information Not Available
MORGANTOWN OW
MOUNTAIN HOME AIR FORCE
BASE
NANSEMOND ORD DEPOT Not reported
NAV STATION TODD-TACOMA Not reported
NEBRASKA ORDNANCE PLANT No Not Applicable Yes 24 ppb Army reports EPA has been
investigating this site because it
was a fireworks manufacturing
factlity for approximately 20 years
subsequent to DoD use. There
has been no basis or historical
record to suspect DoD
perchlorate usage.
NEW HANOVER CNTY ARPT Not reported

NEW LONDON NSB Yes
NEWPORT NETC Not reported
NORFOLK COMNAVBASE Not reported
NORFOLKNSY Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE (DOE) Not reported
PANTEX ORDNANCE PLANT (TX Not reported
TECH)
PARRIS ISLAND MCRD Not reported The overwhelming Archive Search Report and
majority of Range Identification and
munitions used Preliminary Range
Assessment do not have any
aboard the Depot
specific reference to
have been small
perchlorate. The majority of
arms. In addition, rockets that have been fired
some mortar fire, on Parris Island (primarily
some artillery, during the 1930's) had solid or
grenades, rockets powder propellants. Not sure
and pyrotechnics. what types of munitions may
Artillery dates back have contained perchlorate as
to the early part of an ingredient.
the century, rockets
and mortars were
also fired until the
WWII timeframe,
grenades were
thrownlfired until
the mid-1990s.
PATUXENT RIVER NAS Yes

PEARL HARBOR FISC Not reported
PEARL HARBOR INACTSHIPDET Not reported
PEARL HARBOR NS Yes
PEARL HARBOR NSB No
PEARL HARBOR NSY No
PEARL HARBOR PWC Not reported
PENSACOLA NAS Not reported
PORT HADLOCK NOC PAC DIV DET Not reported
PORTSMOUTH NSY No
PUGET SOUND FISC BREMERTON No Not Applicable
PUGET SOUND NAVHOSP No

BREMERTON
PUGET SOUND NSY Not reported
QUANTICO MCB Not reported pyro, rockets, GP
ordnance, anti-tank
weapons, artillery,
mortars, etc.
REDSTONE ARSENAL Yes Yes 37-19,000 ppb Possible pathway exists
however sampling and
drinking water sources have
not been impacted. Elevated
levels of perchlorate have
been detected in springs that
empty into a creek that, in
turn, empties into the river.
This site is located one-mile
upstream of the arsenal's
drinking water intake. The
drinking water intake has
been analyzed for perchlorate
and the results are non
detect.
RIVERBANK ARMY AMMO PLANT Information Not Available
ROBINS AIR FORCE BASE Yes
ROCKY MOUNTAIN ARSENAL Not reported
SAN BER ENGR DEPOT Not reported
SANGAMO ORDNANCE PLANT Not reported
SOLDIER SYSTEMS CENTER Not reported

ST JULIEN'S CREEK ANNEX Not reported
STROTHER FIELD Not reported
SUNFLOWER AAP Not reported
TINKER AIR FORCE BASE Yes
TOBYHANNA AD No
TODD-SEATILE DRYDOCK INC Not reported
TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE No
TUCSON INTERNATIONAL Not reported
AIRPORT
lWIN CITIES AAP Not reported
TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE No
WAHIAWA NCTAMS EASTPAC Not reported
WASHINGTON NAVY YARO Not reported
WELDON SPRING ORD WORKS Not reported
WEST VIRGINIA ORO WORKS Not reported
WHIDBEY ISLAND NAS Not reported
WHITING FIELD NAS No
WIlliAMSBURG FISC CHEATHAM No
ANNEX
WILLOW GROVE AIR FORCE Yes
RESERVE
WILLOW GROVE NAS Not reported
WRIGHT PATIERSON AIR FORCE Yes
BASE
YORKTOWN NWS No Not Applicable No Not Applicable
YUMA MCAS Yes pyrotechnics, Yes <4-4.56 Note 1: The Camp Billy
munitions, rockets See Machen WTP located on
and munitions Notes the Chocolate Mountain
assemblies Bombing Range (CMAGR)
had a result of 4.21
microgram per liter (ug/L.
This is a ground water
system that is provided by
Imperial County.
Note 2: The Cannon
Complex WTP located on
the Barry M. Goldwater
Bombing Range had a
result of <4.00 ug/L, this is
also ground water system.
Note 3: The Main Station
WTP had a result of 4.56
ug/L, this is a surface
water system which
receives raw water from
the Colorado River. The
test were conducted using
the Environmental
Protection Agency (EPA)
method 314, with a
detection level of 4.00
ug/L.
MayOYDraft
DoD am Non-DoD Sit!'!!';
Component Facility Name City
State Test Site/Source Sampled Detected Comments Known Human Exposure?
Air Force
AmoldAFB Tullahoma
TN
yes Sed - Awaiting Resulls
Air Forre
BealeAFB Marysville
CA
yes GW
Air Force Buckley AFB Aurora CO no State is inquiring
Air Force
Cannon AFB Clovis
NM yes Soil, OW, SW- 25 ugllll 6.1 NMED State requirement: Unknown
uall March 1999 detect Anrll 1999
Air Force
Cape Cod AFS Sandwich
MA yes NO
Air Force
Davis Monthan AFB Tucson ~ yes 5011 (unconfirmed) Source - Explosives, Unknown
Propellant Disposal; stale
provisional soil cleanup levels
Air Force
Duluth. Reserve Center Duluth
MN yes NO None
Air Force
EdwardsAFB Edwards
CA Jet Propulsion Lab. North yes GW,soil Source - Rocket Research
Base (36.000 ug/L maximum level
detected in GW plume from
Air Force ElisworthAFB Rapid City
SO yes NO GWsampled
Air Force FE Warren AFB Cheyenne

VI(( no
Air Force HiIIAFB Ogden

UT yes Soil. Gw, OW - 70 ugll Tested Soil, GW. OW - GW
maximum level detected in found in installation mOnitoring
GW well
Air Force HollomanAFB Gallup
NM yes NO Source - Rockel Testing, GW. Unknown
SW soil/sedlmenl
Air Force Kirtland AFB Albuaueraue
NM yes NO
Air Force Lackland AFB San Antonio
TX ves Awaiting Results
Air Force Lanaley AFB Hamoton
VA ves Awaitina Results
Air Force MatherAFB Sacramento CA Closed
Air Force McClellan AFB Sacramento

CA Clased
Air Force McConnell AFB Wichita

KS yes NO Titan Sites - GW. soil sampled
Air Force Melrose Air Foree Range Melrase

NM yes Awaiting Resulls Source - Explosives; soil. OW, Unknown
SW
Air Foree MoodyAFB Valdosta
Gil. no
Mountain Home AFB ID no
Air Foree New Basion AFS Manchester, NH

Mil. yes NO
Offutt AFB NE no
Air Force OnizukaAFS Sunnyvale CA yes OW - Awaiting Results
Air Foree PatrickAFB Cocoa Beach Fl yes NO NASA had non-detect, too.
Air Force Plant 4 Forth Worth

TX yes NO
Air Force Plant 42 Palmdale
CA yes NO I
Air Foree Plant 44 Tucson ~ ves NO

Air Force Plant PJKS walerton CO yes NO
Air Force Poinsett Range ShawAFB SC yes GW - 8.4 ugiL maximum level
detected
Air Force Randoloh AF8 San Antonio TX no

Air Foree Sheppard AFB Witchlla Falls TX ves Awaitina Results
Air Foree TinkerAFB Oklahoma City OK no
Air Foree TravisAFB Fairfield CA yes OW - Awaiting Results Depl. of Health Services
sampled
Sed- N
wei er
GW - groundwater NO - non det. ct
OW - drinking water 10f6 OB/OD - open bum/ open detonab n
May 03 Draft
000 ant Non-Don ~it~~
Component Facility Name City State Test Site/Source Sampled Detected Comments Known Human Exposure?
Air Force Vandenberg AFB lompoc CA yes Soil, in GW max detect 517 Tested Soil, GW, OW - found
ugll in GW site 8, SlC4 in TCE
Air Force Westover AFB Chicopee MA no RAB, via state, is requesting
samolino
Air Force
Wright-Patterson AFB Dayton OH yes NO
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COA drinking water yes OW State has issued health
advisory for the City of
Aberdeen of 1 ppb perchlorate
in drinking water, State has
issued a Draft Administrative
Order to the APG to monitor,
evaluate, and clean up
perchlorate conlamination,
APG has ceased training w/ Yes. Perchlorate has been found in
munitions containing . drinking supply wells (ND- 5ppb) for
perchlorate in the affected the City of Aberdeen
area EPA Region III was Perchlorate has been detected in the
involved in the sampling. aquifer that supplies water to the City
01 Aberdeen.
Annv Aberdeen ProvinQ Ground Aberdeen MD COAwelifreld ves GW See above See above.
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD COAweils yes GW See above. See above.
Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford drinking water yes OW See above. See above.
Army Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD Harford well field no .See above. See above
Anny Aberdeen Proving Ground Aberdeen MD HarfordweUs yes GW See above See above.
Anny Badger Anny Ammunition Plant Baraboo WI yes NO state requested sampling
Anny Camp Bonneville Vancouver WA yes Soil,GW Camp Bonneville is listed by

EPA as a potenlial source for
perchlorate releases. Source •
Explosives, Propellant
Disposal, missile disposal
Anny Camp Bullis San Antonio TX OB/OO area yes GW Sampled in 2001 & 2002 due
to request from state
regulators
Army Camp Navajo Bellemont AZ. Detonation Pits yes GW
Army Dugway Proving Ground Dugway UT no Dugway is preparing a

proposal for perchlorate
assessment.
Annv Fort Meade Odenton MD OBIOO areas ves GW
Anny
Fort Wingate Gallup NM OB/OD areas yes GW BRAC site currently under
State Cleanup authority.
Source· Explosives Disposal
Anny Jefferson Proving Ground Madison IN Range boundaries yes Sample resuRs pending
QNQC
Anny
lake City Anny Ammunition Plant Independence MO yes GW No exposure pathway suspected 2
of 30 wells sampled With results 01 23
and 79 ppb - no drinkIng water
sources are known to be threatened
Anny lone Star Anny Ammunition Plant Texarkana TX Burning Ground yes GW Unknown 8 ppb found in GW by
burning grounds and 9 ppb found
next to production bldQ.
Anny
lone Star Anny Ammunition Plant Texarkana TX Production Bldg yes Soil See above.
Sed -- -- _..
ce water
GW - groundwater NO - non detect
OW - drinking water 20f6 OB/OO • open burn! open detonation
May 03 Draft
000 ::Inl Non-ODD Sites
Component Facility Name City State Test SitelSource Sampled Detected Comments Known Human Exposure?
Army Longhorn Army Aummition Plant Karnack TX yes Soil,GW,SW LHAAP is being used to test
No human health exposure
and study different perchlorate
determined. Perchlorate is not
cleanup technologies as well
approaching drinking water
as being used to stUdy
sources. Installation has defined
ecologicat effects of
nature and extent of perchlorate
perchlorate. Source-
contamination at various locatIons on
Propellant Handling
Longhorn property. Nature and
extent of perchlorate contamination
in soil and groundwater has been
identified. Monitoring of surface
water continues on a quarterly basis
per an agreement with regulatory
agencies. No determ ination of a
HumanlPublic exposure pathway has
been determined
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA MMR OBIOD areas yes GW EPA Region I has directed a
screening level of 1.5 ppb and
a cleanup level of 4 ppb.
Massachusetts Department of
Environmental Protection
(MDEP) has issued a heallh
advisory of 1 ppb in drinking Yes, Perchlorate has been detected
water for the Towne of in wells that supply the town of
Bourne. Towne of Bourne Bourne « 1 ppb) and in a private-
have been shut down and residence Bourne well (1.75 ppb).
Perchlorate has been found in a sole
USACE has built a pipeline
connecting Bourne with a source aquller located under MMR
upto 300 PPbl.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA Bourne water supply wells yes OW See above. See above.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA Gallow Skating Rink yes GW See above. See above.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA MMR Impact areas yes GW See above. See above.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA MMR Testing ranges yes GW See above. See above.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservalion Falmouth MA MMR Training ranges yes GW See above. See above.
Army Massachusetts Military Reservation Falmouth MA yes GW Source - OB/OD. See above. See above.
Army McAlester Army Ammunition Plant McAlester OK Brown Lake yes SW State and EPA Region 6
directed sampling of adjacent
lakes using RCRA 3004
authority. No sampling yet
conducted at the OBIOD
pending agreement between
state and EPA Region 6
Army McAlester Army Ammunition Plant McAlester OK OBIOD areas no See above.
Army McAlester Army Ammunition Plant McAlester OK Rocket Lake yes SW See above.
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX OBIOO areas yes SW State requires quarterly
sampling of, OBIOD siles and
there is a sampltng plan. State
has added perchlorate to
RRAD's TPDES permit State
has asked RRAO to develop a
Pollution Prevention Control
Plan (ppep) to address
perchlorate
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX Sanitary Sewage Plant yes Soil,GW See above.
Army Red River Army Depot Texarkana TX yes GW Source - Propellant Handling
See above.
Sed - ·01.... ,ICl~ water
OW - drinking water 3of6 OBiOO - open burn! open detonation
May 03 Draft
nnn",n, Nnn-DoD ~it.. c::
Army Redstone Arsenal Huntsville Al yes GW There are two known plumes sampling and drinking water sources
of perchlorate with elevated have not been impacted Elevated
levels of perchlorate. Currently levels of perchlorate have been
no drinking water sources are detected in springs that empty into a
threatened. creek that, in tum, empties into the
river. This site is kJeated one-mile
upstream of the arsenal's drinking
wate, intake The drinking water
intake has been analyzed for
perchtorate and the results are non-
detect.
Army Seneca Army Depot Romulus NY no Seneca Army Depot has been
directed by regulators to
assess for perchlorate.
Seneca is evaluating the
request, but there is no action
yet. Regulators are targeting
the OBrOD grounds.
Army Whrte Sands Missile Range las Cruces NM yes Soil Source - Rocket Testing
DOE los Alamos National Lab los Alamos NM yes GW,DW Source - DOE Lab Chemicals
DOE Sandia National Lab NM

DOE Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory Tracy CA yes GW Source - DOE Explosives
Srte 300 Research
DOE Energy Technoloav Enaineerino Center CA
DOE PANTEX Plant Amarilla TX ves GW Source - EXPlosives
FUDS Kerr-McGee Perchlorate Plant Henderson NV yes GW,SW,DW Source - Chemical
Manufacturina
FUDS Nike 14 Launcher Area CA yes Records search will address
potential FUDS eligibility for
emergent chemicals identified
in leuer ree'd from reg agency.
FUDS Pyrrte Canyon Glen Avon CA Need to establish FUDS

eligibility. Records search will
also inclUde checking ff any
perchlorate containing item s
were storedfassembled, etc on
site or ff site usage during
FUDS time era could have
contributed'to conditions.
FUDS Rialto (formerly Rialto Ammunition Supply Rialto CA Drinking water supply yes (by Army or OW Source - Fireworks Faeility(?),
Point) wells others) BF Goodrich, Rocket
Research and Manufacturing
FUOS Shumaker NAD Camden AR SurfICial Aquifer yes GW USACE has conducted PRP
investigations that have
determined the Navy did nat
use perchlorate at the srte.
Post-Navy tenants at the site
have used perchlorate.
NASA NASA - Jet Propulsion Lab Raymond Basin Pasadena CA yes OW Source - RQCket Research
Navy Brunswick NAS Brunswick ME EOD Range yes Awarting Results
Navy China Lake China lake CA Test and Training Range yes yes
NaVY Concord Concord CA no

Navy Corona Corona CA yes Awaiting Results
Navy Crane Crane IN yes Awaiting Results

Sed bnim..nt ~w _."ri", water
ow - drinking water 4 afB OBfOD - open burn! open detonalion
May 03 Draft
non ;:ml Non-non !=:itpc>
Component Facility Name City Siale 'Test Site/Source Sampled Detected Comments Known Human Exposure?
Navy Dahlgren Dahlgren VA no
Navy EI Taro Irvine CA EOD Range yes GW BRAC
Navy Indian Head Indian Head MD propellant handling yes GW,SW
Navy Lualualei, Rocket Test Facility Lualuale; HI yes no
Navy McGregor Naval Weapons Plant McGregor TX propellant handling yes Soil,GW,SW Closed
Navy Nomans Island MA bombing range yes Awaiting Results Transferred
Navy San Nicholas Island Ventura County CA EOD Range yes GW
Naw Seal Beach Seal Beach CA ves Awaitino Results

Navy South weymouth EX-NAS Weymouth MA EOD Range yes Awaiting Results BRAC
Navy I/\Ihite Oak Fed. Research Center (Naval Silver Spring MD propellant handling yes GW BRAC
Surface Warfare Centerl
Non-DoD Aerodyne Gila Rivel Ind. Res Chandler AZ yes GW
Non-DoD - Aerojet General (affect's Mather AFB) Rancho Cordova CA yes GW,DW Source - Rocket
Manufacturino
Non-DoD Allegheny Ballistics Lab Rocket Center WI yes GW Source - Rocket Reseelch,
Production, OBOD
Non-DoD- Alliant Tech Systems Magna UT yes OW Source - Rocket
Manufacturina
Non-DoO- Alpha Explosives Lincoln CA yes GW,SW Source - Explosives
Manufacturina
Non-DoD American Water Work Service Greenwood IN yes OW (unconfirmed)
Non-DoO- American Water Work Service Clinton IA yes OW (ljnconfirmed)
Non-DoD American water Works Service Clovis NM yes OW (unconfirmed)
Non-DoD American Water Works Service Yardely PA yes OW (unconfirmed)
Non-DoO- Apache Nitrogen Products Benson AZ yes GW Source ~ Explosive

Manutacturino
Non-DoD - Allantic Research East Camden AR yes Soil,GW, SW Source - Rocket
Manufacturino. OBOO
Non-DoD •• BaeingiRocketdyne, NASA at Santa Santa Susana CA yes GW Source - Rocket Research,
Susana Field Lab USOOE T estin~ and Production
Non-DoD" Ewart IA Ewart IA ves GW
Non-DoD" Herington, KS Herington KS yes GW Source - Ammunition Facility
Non-DoD" ICI Explosives Joplin MO yes GW Source.- Explosives Facility
Non-DoD" ITC United Technoloaies San Jose CA yes GW Source - Rocket Testina
Non-DoD" Lewiston, NE lewiston NE yes OW Source - Agricultural Chemical
Facilltv
Non-DoD" Lockheed Propulsion Upper Santa Ana Redlands CA yes OW Source - Rocket
Vallev Manufacturino
Non-DoD Mead, NE Mead NE yes GW Source - Fireworks Facifjty
Non-DoD .. Napier, IA Napier IA yes GW Source - Agricultural (?)
Non-DoO- PEPCON Henderson NV yes GW Source - Chemical

Manufacturina
yes
Sed· ,~h\E!??0"
San Fernando Valley Glendale CA GW Source - Rocket
SW-surfa water
Manufacturina
GW-. detect
OW· drinking water 50f6 OB/OO - open bum! open delonallon
May 03 Draft
DoD ;lnl Non-DoD ~ ~itp~
Non-DoD San Gabriel Valley Baldwin Park CA yes GW,DW Source - Aerojet, Rocket
Manufacturing
Non-DoD - Thiokol Promontory UT yes DW Source - Rocket
Manufacturina
Non-DoD - Unidynamics Phoenix Inc. Goodyear AZ Phoenix Goodyear Airport yes GW Source - Explosives,
Ordnance Disposal
Non-DoD - Unidynamics Phoenix Inc. Goodyear AZ VvIlite Tanks Disposal yes Soil. DW (unconfirmed) Source - Explosives,
Area Ordnance Disposal
Non-DoD Universal Propulsion Phoenix AZ yes Soil Source - Rocket
Manufacturino
Non-DoD - Westhampton Westhampton NY yes GW,DW Source - Agricullural (?)
Non-DoD - VvIlillaker Ordinance Hollister CA yes GW,DW Source - Ordnance

Manufacturina
Non-DoD VvIlittaker-Bermlle Ordnance Santa Clarita CA yes DW Source - Ordnance
Manufacturino
Non-DoD- Yaphank Yaphank NY yes GW,DW
- Non-DoD source information obtained from Mayer USEPA dala
', 111
I~ -,
Sed - sediment SW - surface waler

GW - groundwater ND - non detect
DW - drinking water 60f6 OBIOD - open bum! open detonation
Unknown
•
From: Kowalczyk Daniel
Sent:
wednesday, June 11. 200312;24 PM
To;
Sandra Colter
Ce:
Shah Choudhury; Col Dan Rogers: Lt Col Jeff Cornell: Rlehard Balzer
SubJect:
Additional Input for Henke Request
eackgroulld Henb!
SACv2.doc
Sandy,
PleaSe tind a revi~e? document for you to review. Hope it helps.
vir
Dan
Daniel Kowalczyk
Bocz Allen Hamilton
8283 Green;boro Dr
McLean, VA 22102
(ph)
(faxl
Unknown
From: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD~ATL

Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 11: 11
To: Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL: SUllivan, Maureen, Ms, OSD-ATL
Cc: Miller, Edmund, Mr, OSD-ATL
SUbject: cover letter for sampling policy.doc
cover letter for

sampling polL ..
Mr. Grone wants to put a "cover letter" on the perchlorate samp:i~g
policy. I have attached a proposal. Comments?
Kurt
1
Plna, Devon, eTR, 000, aGe
From: Cotter, Sandra. Ms, OSD·ATL
Sent: Thursday, June 26. 200310:22 AM
To: Rogers, DanIel, Col. AFLSAIJACE; 'Kowalczyk Daniel'; Comell, Jeff, Lt. Col. SAF/IE: 'Richard
B. Belzer PhD'
C'l: Kratz, Kurt. I OSD·ATl; Ferrebee, Patricia, Ms, OSO-ATl
SubJect: FW: 2003·0313·I'E··New Asstgrvnent
Importance: High
FOIA%2003F1442.
pdt
AlL
- .
Are we close to completing informacion collection for this aotion?
Please let me know.
SC
From: Espinal John M Civ 11 CS/SCSL (FOIA)
Sent: Wednesday. June 11, 2003 1:42 PM
To: Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL
Subject: FW: 2003-03l3-I!--New Assignment
Inportance: High
Ma'am, if you are requesting the AF to search or provide documents
relating to the subject FOIA, you must go through OSD'S FOIA. They will
in-curn task our office. If you have any questions, please contact OSD
FOIA for guiaance.
I ca.n be reached at • • • • ThanKS • .John.
-----Oriqinal Messaqe----
From: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col, SAF/IE
Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 12:14 PM
To: Cotter. Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL. Ferrebee. Patricia, Ms, OSO-ATLr Kratz.
Kurt, , OSD-ATL
ee: Espinal John M eiv 12 CS/SCSL (FOIA); Cox, Kerri. Civ, SAF/GCA;
Rogers. Daniel, Col, AFLSA/JACE: Daly, ?atrick, Col. AF/ILEV: Ashworth,
Richard, col, SAF/lE; Koetz, Maureen, SES. SAFflE; Groner. Laurence,
Civ, SAF/GCN; Ross, Elaine, Ms, SAP/lEE; Lowas, Albert, BES. AFRPA;
Beda. CarolAnn, AFRPA: Whitten Rodney Civ AFBCA/EV; Carrillo, David.
Civ, AF/ILEVR
Subject; FW: 2003-031)-IE--New Assignment
Importance: High
Sandy: pleaso let me know &8 soon as we have an extension date for this
FOI, WQ would like 30 days from. the time that we reoeive4 the r.que~t (5
Jul03). Also, I have been working hard to try and find the correct
procedures for a FOIA request af this tlEi' g'omehow, someway our FOIA
office (11 CS/SCSL(FOIA). John Espi~l, . . needs to receive some
contact from the OSD FOIA office for us to process this according to law
(and with the confidence of their professlona1 expertisel. please help
me make this contact happen .•. if you have POC info for ,the right fo1~s
at OSD, please pass it along so Mr. Espin~l can help us Qut by handling
the taskings and legal review. 1!Y the way this is not preventing our
work on this ..• heads up has been given to affected agencies, b~t its my
underst.anding' {from conversations with SAF/GCN and GCA) that we'll need
to close official loops to have the info ~eviewed and released.
1
jeff
Lt col Jeff cornell. USAF, BSC. PhD
Cleanup & MUnitions RespOnQe Program Manager
From; Cotte~. Sandra. Ms. OSD-ATL
Sent: Thursday, June 05, 2003 9:05 AM
To: Rogers, Daniel, Col. AFLSA/JACE; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. col. SAF/IE; Dan
Kowalczyk
Ce: Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGC; Kratz, Kurt, • OSD-ATL
subject: FW: 2003-0313-IE--New Assignment
Attached is a FOIA for all information related to perchlorate. I think
we can safelY exclude any drafts or pre-decisional document$ and any
instance/document involving deliberationa by counsel.
Response is due the 10th. please provide preliminary thoughts on
documencs you feel should be released under this request by COB today.
SC
-----original Message--·-
From: Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL
Sent~ wednesday, June 04, 2003 6:47 PM
To: cotter. Sandra. M$, OSD-ATL
Subject: FW: 2003-0313-IE--New Asaignment
<1 Jun 03
Sandy--another perchloraee action. I have not done anything with this,
nor have I told Sarah to change AO to you.
Shah
-~---Original Message----
From: lE_Task_Track@acq.osd.mil Irnailto:IE_Task_Trackiacq.osd.mill
Sent.:iliTuiiieiis~d.a~y.,.Jiiu.niie_oii3.,.210iiOj33 147 PM
To: ~
Subject: 2003-0313-IE--~ew ~~si~nt
This is an automatic notification. Please do not repl~.
You have been assigned a task:

- Item 10: 2003-0313-IE
- ATL Task? No
- Red Taogged? ~o
- Tasker Org: IE
- Task~d Orglsl: IE
- Tasked Person: Shah ChoUdhury
- Task Due Date 6/10/2003
- Tasker Tele~hone:
- Open Initials: sh
- When Added: 6/3/2003 3:39:40 PM
- Task Track URL:
https://lewis.acq.osd.mil/tasktrack/ie.nsf/···*-/160FF5D3C5CB392385256D3
A006C005
- Subject: FOrA 03-F-l442, 000 Perchlorate Assessment Policy. Guidance

and/oJ;' Cleanup
- Comments: On 6/3/2003 l5:50:45. Sarah Haqan wrote: Hard copy placed
in
CL box.
2
3
Control Nllmber and Date: 03-1'-111:42

;U·...y·03
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DIRECTORATE FO~ FREEDOM OF INFORMATION a.late12 c.... n/a
AND SeCURITY REVIEW TOP Secret: Hu'illbex n,.
Action Altlaned to:
.I~ Installations & Environment IARAHHAGAH
3:1791
FREEDOM OF INFORMATION
ACTION
Under Provisions of the FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT (5 USC 552) and 000 Directive 5400.7,
respond no later thsn: 10.JUN.Q3
READ AND FOLLOW THESE SPECIAL INSTRUCTIONS
1, Handlo this material 86 a package. Do not break it up or allow It to become seplilreted from this
cover.
2. H.ead the FOIA Infannatton Sheet. If there is anything you dO not fully understand or need clarified,
phone DIRECTORATE FOR FREEDOM OF INFORMATION AND SECURITY REVIEW ACTION
OFFICER AT THE EXTENSION PROVIDED:
LtCol RENONA J. ETTER-TROTTEa., Rm.2C'7$7, _
e-mail t uncla•• ifiec1 Fax _
3. When complete. do not piece in Distribution Courier Service. Call for pIckup or deliver directly to
Room 2C757.
SD FORM 466, FEB 1998 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE.

~,
REPOH I CONTROL
RECORD OF FREEDOM OF INFORMATION (FOil PROCESSING COST SYMBOL
Please read instructions on back befale completing falm.
DD-DA&M(A)1365
3. DATE coMPLETED IYYVYMAfDDi
". ACTION OFFICE
1. REQUESl' NUMBER
I03-F
~.
j'-/'1d. ~ a. INITIAL n
TVPE OF REQUEST (X one)
b. APPEAL
FEE
5. CLERICAL HOURS (E·9IGS·8 and below) 11 I TOTAL HOURS 121 HOURLY RATE 131 COST
CODE
,
a. SEARCH
b. REVIEW/EXCISING 2 X UO.OO
-
c, OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS 3
e. PROFESSIONAL HOURS (0·1. ·0·6ICS·9·GS·151/CONTRACTOR (0 TOTAL HOURS 121 HOURLY RATE 13I COST
... S~AJ:lCIol 1
b, REVIEW/EXCISING
c. OTHER/COORDINATION/DENIAL
2
3
X $44.00 -
-
III TOTAL HOURS (21 HOURLY RATE (3) COST
7. EXECUTIVE HOURS (0·7· ES 1 and above)
e, SEARCH ,
b. REVIEW/EXCISING
c. OTHER/COORDINATION/DENIAL
2
3
X $75.00
-
...
R. C':OIVlPI ITFR ~FARC':H (1) TOTAl. TIME l2) RATE IJI C08T
.~"""'"
I, MACHINE TIME (NUl PC, rJusAtop, laptop) 4
f!;~~f~1~:~!f~ffif~J~jiJ1!:f~~;~i[J~~
b. PROCiRAMMER/OPERATOR TIME (Humlln)
(1) Clerical Hours

,'ii:
1
l!T¥'m·:L ...,
X
$20,OO/hr -
(2) Professionel Hours , $44.00/hr
9. OFFICE MACHINE COpy REPRODUCTION (1J NUMBER (2) RATE (3) COST
a. PAGES REPRODUCED FOR FILE COPY
b. PAG~S RELEASm
3
E
X
.16
.1S -
10. PRE·PRINTED PUBLICATIONS OJ TOTAL PAGES 121 RATE 131 COST
a. PAGES PRINTED
11. COMPUTER PRODUCT OUTPUT/ACTUAL COST CHARGES
6
(1) NUMBER
X .02
(2) ACTUAL COST
- (3) COST
a. TAPE/DISC/CO 8
b. PAPER PRINTOUT ~
X
-
12, OTHER ADMINISTRATIVE FEES n) NUMBER 121 ACTUAL COST (31 COST
a. ALL POSTAGE/ADMINISTRATIVE (See insTrvctions)
13, AUDIOVISUAL MAfERIALS
3
{II NUMBER
X
121 ACTUAL COST
- 131 COST
a, MATERIALS REPRODUCED
14. SPECIAL SERVICES

4
III NUMBER
X
I2t ACTUAL COST
- 131 COST
a. ALL SPECIAL SERVICES (See insTruCTions) 8 X
-
15. MICROFICHE REPRODUCED 5 X .25 -
, FEE CODE5
Chargeable to 'commercial" requeSters. Ch_geable to "other"
16. FOR FOI OFFICE USE ONLY
I. TOTAL COLLECTABLE FEES
reQueuers after deducting 2 hours.
2 Charoeable to "commercial' requesters onlv. b. TOTAL PROCESSING FEES
3 Not chargeable to any tee cetegory.
4 Chargeable to "commercial". Chergeable to "other' after c. TOTAL CHARGED
deduction of the equivalent 01 2 hOLlrs. (Exemple: deduct d. FEES WAIVED/REDUCED (X one) Ves No
$88.00 prof.sslo"al rate.)
5 Chergllllble to all fee categories after deduction of 100 pages e. FEES NOT APPLICABLE fX one) Ves No
IDOES NOT Include "commercill"),
6 Chargeable to all fee categories. No deductions. See Chapter 6, Fee Schedule, DoD 5400.7·R, to determine appropriate
assessment af fees.
DD FORM 2086. JAN 2003 PREVIOUS EDITION IS OBSOLETE.
05/15/03 11:40 FAX 808 388 8024 Press ED~erpr15e ~OOI
I •
DoUGLAS E. BEEMAN
THE PRESS-ENTERPRISE
Staff Writer
May 15, 2003
Mr H.J. McIntyre
Direotorate of Freedom of Information
and Seeurity .Review
Room2C757
1] 55 Defense, Pentagon
Washington. D.C. 20301-1155
SUBJECT: Freedom ofTnfonnation Request
DeaT Mr. McIntyre:

I
This is a request under the Freedom oflnformation Act, 5 U.S.C. Sec. 552. , request that a copy of the
following documents be provided to me:
Documents inc1u.dm,g but not limited to letters, e-mails, memoranda, reports, or minutes from any
meetingslbricfings. diacullsin&, the Department ofDcfensc Perchlorate Aascssmemt Policy. guidance (or
interim guidanec) on perehlorak !lIampling. analysis. testin2 and/or o1elm-up. This includes any
memoranda, letters, e-mails or reports since 1999 discussing the Dcpar1ment ofDetensc's position on
perchlorate clean-up at Defense Components or Defense contractor sites. This request includes any
documents from or to Mr. John Paul Woodley Jr., Assistant Dep\llY Under Secretary ofDcfcnsc
(Environment); Mr. Shah A. Choudhury; Ms. MAureen Sullivan; and. Mr. Raymond F. DuBois, Ueputy
Under SceretalY ofDefcnse (Installiltions It Environment).
I request a waiver of all fees for this request. I am a member orthc news media, and di»clolllUR: uf 11K;
requested inf~tion to mt. is in the public in~st bec:au5e it is likely to contribute significantly to
public understanding of the operations or activiti~ of the govlIIJ'DJnent. It is Dot primarily in my
cummcr"iid in~~~t, nor Am 1 A bWlin~5 t:ryiJ:lg to con.at informa.tion on iDdw:trial eomperitor£:.
Copies of the documcuts I seck may be mailed to: Doug1a.5 E. Beeman, stat! W1'iter, The Press·Enb:rprise,
3512 Fourteenth St., Riverside, CA 92501-3878. If you have any questlOJ1S, please call me at (909) 368·
9549.
Sincerely.
Dougl
Staff r
The Press-Enterprise
P.O. Box 792
Ri "",,.:;iuc. C uljf. 92502
(9r,Q) :lM;.l)~49
I
3512 Fourteenth Street. Riverside. CA 92501-3878.909/368..9549. email: dbeemol.l@pe.com
I
--_ .._. - - - ' - '

Unknown '3,/..'1
1'10111: Bannerman ErIc
II4Inl: MondJy. se;mb'r OS. 20(» "2;34
'1"0:
Srb/eCl:
~
cO/110,...) ....R
.1'll'M....ftd..,p. ..
1l.~J.",
0tI behalf of Olln,\ kO'loll.lc¥~k, J Iva Ott'Ch8(l ill cOpy at: tn_
",?Zl3::"'· "
i .....
C.l1:c.nJ.. In.t..n"Uons and Properti-.. dll:udaheet. Ple~4e feel free t.p
contact ""e ~:t' .o.rI. if yOI1 h.".

any question...
.lit..,.,
t'hlin.k~ you,
tr.1oa 84nna~lIan
Iloo~ Alla" a"",ilt/)I'I
9283 C"•• noboro tlr
~
2102
(phi
(e.x)
FFID Installation Component Program Sampled Detected Comments Known

Human
Exposure
CA99799F694000 (CAFS) FAMILY HOUSING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F694100 (CAFS)HEARST RANCH AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03400 11TH NAVAL DISTRICT HQ/SUPPLY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526100 29 PALMS BOUNDARY/CONDOR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA05700 33RD BRIGADE- ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547500 AAA BATTERY 95 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534900 AAA LOS ANGELES SITE #60 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524000 AAA SITE NO. 55 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F535100 ABALONE POINT FC STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F754100 ACCESS ROAD FOR EL CENTRO ROCKET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEIM
TA
CA99799FA36000
ADEL PRECISION PRODUCTS CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F978400
ADVANCED BASE DEPOT-RIFLE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36100
AEROJET ENGINEERING CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530400
AF PLANT #14 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530600
AF PLANT #42, K9 ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527900
AF PLANT #70 (AEROJET-GEN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F528000
AF PLANT #71 (AIR PROD&CHE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB1300
AFRC FRESNO ARMY DERA
CA99799F535300
AGF&ASF REDISTRIB STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531000
AIR FORCE PLANT # 72 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530500
AIR FORCE PLANT #16 (NASA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F535400
AIR FORCE PLANT #19 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530900
AIR FORCE PLANT #64 (NASA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531100
CA99799F535200
CA99799F532700
AIR FORCE PLANT 10 (NORTHORP) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532600
AIR FORCE PLANT 15 (NAA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957172462700
AIR FORCE PLANT 42 AIR FORCE DERA Yes Not detected
CA957172532300
AIR FORCE PLANT 70 AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799FA06100
AIR TRAINING SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36200
AIROX COMPANY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F522600
ALAMEDA AIR DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569400
ALAMEDA MOLE GUN EMP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
I
;A917002323600 ALAMEDANAS NAVY BRAC
:A917002423000 ALAMEDA NMCRC NAVY DERA
:A99799F689400 ALCATRAZ FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
:A99799FA31100 ALCATRAZ ISLAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
::A99799FA27600 ALDER PEAK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
::A99799FA01200 ALEXANDER LEAD MINES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
::A99799F996800 ALHAMBRA AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
~A99799F535500 ALLEN AUX FIELD #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F590000
ALMADEN AIR FORCE STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534300
AME ROCKWELL EL SEGUNDO AUXILI FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F688500
AMPHIBIOUS TRAINING BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F535600
AMTB BATIERIES 3&4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA34300
ANAHEIM AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799F525000
ANGELES NATIONAL FOREST FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA05500
ANTI-AIRCRAFT TRAINING STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30900
ANTIOCH BOMBING TARGET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569500
ARBUCKLE PRI OF WAR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F998800
ARMY AIR BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA35200
ARMY CAMP (SANTEE) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F991700
ARMY RECREATION CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569600
ARMY-NAVY DIST CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36300
ASSOCIATED MANUFACTURING CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03000
AUXILIARY LANDING FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36400
AVIATION GASOLINE FACILITIES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36500
AXELSON CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524300
AZUSA DUMP SITE OWL 4X PL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002755100
AZUSA NCCOSC MORRIS DAM FACILITY NAVY OEM
CA99799FA36600
BAASH-ROSS TOOL COMPANY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA ,.
CA99799FA35400
BAGDAD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F535700
BAKER GAP FIL AX M128F FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36700
BAKERSFIELD GAUYULE PROCESSING MILL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
DERA
CA99799F535600
BAKERSFIELD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
DERA
CA99799FA36800
BAKERSFIELD VEGETABLE DEHYDRATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
DERA
CA99799F569700
BALLICO AUX FLO #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
DERA
CA99799FA35500
BANNING AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES
DERA
99799F536000 BANNING GENERAL HOSP
FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
99799F536100 BANNING PARK CAMP
99799F536200 BANNING RIFLE RANGE
.99799FA03100 BARNES AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
,917302426100 BARSTOW MClB NAW DERA
.99799FA35100 BARSTOW NORTH DISPOSAL SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
,99799FA00700 BASIC MAGNESltlM SALT SPRINGS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
\99799FA26100 BASIC TRAINING CENTER NO.8, FRESNO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
\99799F524700 BAYWOOD PARK TRAINING AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
\99799F536300 BEACON SITE #1 MF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
~99799F536400 BEACON SITE #2 MF
~99799F536500 BEACON SITE #3 MF
1ll99799F536600 BEACON SITE #4 MF
A99799F570800 BEALE AFB TVOR ANX
FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OEM
A957212450800 BEALE AIR FORCE BASE
AIR FORCE DERA Yes In Groundwater No exposure
492 ugiL. max detect at pathway.
site 16, OB?OD Groundwater
monitoring well not used for
drinking
water
;A99799F528100 BEALE ILS OUTER ~AR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
;A99799F569900 BENICIA ARSENAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
::A99799F526500 BERTH 206-215 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
::A99799F995400 BETHLEHEM SHIPBUILDING CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
GA99799FA35600 BIG BEAR AUXILIARY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527200 BIG LAGOON INDIAN RESERV FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49200 BIG LAGOON TARGET RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F536700 BIRMINGHAM ARMY HOSP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570000 BISHOP AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F536800 BISHOP GFA SM164D FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F528200 BLACK POINT COMM FAC ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F536900 BLYTHE MF 8EA SITE #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537000 BLYTHE MF BEA SITE #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537100 BLYTHE ARMY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537200 BLYTHE BEACON SITE ACCESS ROAD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30000 BODEGA HEAD RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570100 BOLINAS MIL RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
. .
CA99799F537300 BOLSA CHICA MIL RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F591300 BOMB MANUFACTURING/STORAGE PLT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F744200 BOMB STORAGE AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755900 BOMB TARGET (#76) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756000 BOMB TARGET (#79) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F7276QO BOMB TARGET NO.5, HOLLISTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA997g9F754700 BOMB TARGET SITE ANDIOR EMERGENCY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
F
CA99799F754600 BOMB TARGET SITE AND/OR EMERGENCY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
F
F
F
F
F
CA99799F596900 BOMB TARGET STANISLAUS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F753800 BOMBIMG TARGET YUMA RECLAMATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
PRO
CA99799F596500 BOMBING TARGET SAN JOAQUIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F753600 BOMBING TARGET (SAN FELlPE)(#67) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50400 BOMBING TARGET (STEWARTS POINT) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F593500 BOMBING TARGET JENNER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50000 BOMBING TARGET NO.6, CROWS LANDING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F596600 BOMBING TARGET SITE SONOMA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F753700 BOMBING TARGETS IMPERIAL DUNES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756100 BOMD TARGET(#103) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F813400 BORDER FIELD STATE PARK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537400 BORON AIR FORCE STATION Z-59 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F774300 BORREGO SPRINGS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F600200 BRAZIL STREET DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537700 BREA FLOOD CONTROL BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302756100 BRIDGEPORT MCMWTC NAVY DERA
CA99799F600000 BROWN FIELD BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA24900 BROWN FIELD NAVAL AUXILIARY AIR STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531200 BUAN AIR FORCE STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA36900 BUFFALO SPRING AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570200 BULK FUEL STORAGE FAC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA32800 BULLION MOUNTAINS AERIAL GUNNERY RA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570300
BYRON HOT SPRINGS INTER CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537800
CADIZ LAKE A TO G GUNNERY RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F538000
CADIZ LAKE SONIC TAR #10 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F538100
CA99799F538200
CA99799F538400
CA99799F537900
CADIZ LAKE SONIC TARGET #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F538300
CADIZ LAKE SONIC TARGET #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OEM
CA99799F538500
CA99799F538600
CA99799F538700
CA99799F538800
CA99799F994600
CAL MARINE INDUSTRIES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F538900
CAL-AERO AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539000
CALIF WING CIVIL AIR PATROL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA37200
CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA37300
CALIFORNIA ROCK SALT CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA37400
CALIFORNIA YACHT CLUB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570400
CALISTOGA RAD BEACON ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570500
CALL MT RAD REL ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532900
CAMARILLO AIRPRT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539100
CAMBRIA AIR FORCE STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531300
CAMBRIA COMMUNICATION FAC ANNX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570600
CAMP ASHBY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570700
CAMP BEALE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F736400
CAMP BEALE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA35700
CAMP C.J. MILLER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539300
CAMP CACTUS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539400
CAMP CALLAN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA37500
CAMP COMMANDER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539500
CAMP COOKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
I
CA99799F539600 CAMP COXCOMB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539700 CAMP DAMBY (CAMA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526700 CAMP DUNLAP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527500 CAMP ELLIOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539800 CAMP ESCONDIDO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539900 CAMP ESSEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F570900 CAMP FLINT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F813200 CAMP GRANITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540000 CAMP HAAN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540200 CAMP IBIS (CAMA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F224600 CAMP IRON MOUNTAIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA01300 CAMP IRWIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FAOSOOO CAMP KIDD NAVAL TRAINING STAT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F906600 CAMP KOHLER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540300 CAMP LA MESA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524500 CAMP LOCKEn FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F979900 CAMP LOCKEn FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F743900 CAMP MANZANAR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571000 CAMP MCQUAIDE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571100 CAMP MIRAMAR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA05600 CAMP MIRAMAR- MARINE CORPS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571200 CAMP MONTARA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA06100 CAMP PENDLETON- MARINE CORPS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302353300 CAMP PENDLETON MCB NAVY DERA
CA99799F540400 CAMP PILOT KNOB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571300 CAMP PINEDALE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FAOO900 CAMP RICE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F691900 CAMP ROBERTS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921180637500 CAMP ROBERTS ARMY. DERA
CA99799FA37900 CAMP RUBIDOUX - ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F688000 CAMP SAN LUIS OBISPO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F998300 CAMP SEASIDE- ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540600 CAMP SEELEY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540700 CAMP SEELEY COMBAT FIRING RG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540900 CAMP SEELEY ORD TRG CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540800 CAMP SEELEY ORDNANCE PROV GRD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541000 CAMP SHAFTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
C"
CA99799F571400
CAMP STONEMAN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571500
CAMP TANFORAN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA06500
CAMP VISTA- ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38000
CAMP WALTER R. TALIAFERRO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08800
CAMP WEBER- ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541100
CAMP YOUNG (CAMA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F523600
CAMP/FT FREMdNT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571600
CAMPBELL AUXILLARY FIELD #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530700
CANOGA AVE FACILITY (AFP#56) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571700
CAPETOWN GAP FIL AX Z-33A FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541200
CARBON CANYON FLOOD CONT BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541300
CARLSBAD VHF STATION 3KI FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F798100
CARRIZO IMPACT AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541400
CARROLL CANYON DEMOLITION AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957002455100
CASTLE AFB AIR FORCE BRAC
CA99799F528300
CASTLE COMM ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F571900
CASTLE ILS OUTER MARK ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572000
CASTLE RAD BEACON ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572100
CASTLE TVOR ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572200
CASTROVILLE-AMPH TNG AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38300
CATALINA TERMINAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA23400
CATALINA TRAINING BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002438300
CENTERVILLE BEACH NAVFAC NAVY DERA
CA99799F996700
CENTRAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572300
CENTRAL SIERRA SNOW LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531400
CHEll AFS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA32400
CHEMEHUEVI INDIAN RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541500
CHERRY VALLEY HOSP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572400
CHICO ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572500
CHINA BEA BIV AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F695600
CHINA LAKE ANNEX 1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002315200
CHINA LAKE NAWS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA38400
CHINO PRISONER OF WAR CAMP - ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F525300
CHOCOLATE MT AERIAL GUNNERY RG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38500
CHRYSLER MOTORS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572600
CIV WAR HOUSING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541600
CLAREMONT RIFLE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA33500 CLARK'S PASS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572700 CLASSIFICATION YARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F541700 COACHELLA RAILHEAD(CAMA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997600 COAST ARTILLERY CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA04100 COAST GUARD AIR BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08900 COAST GUARD STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38600 COMPAK FOODS' FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F572800 CONCORD ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002452800 CONCORDNWS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA08700 CONCRETE SHIP YARDS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA32600 CONDOR FIELD #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA32700 CONDOR FIELD #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38800 CORCORAN PRISONER OF WAR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50700 CORN SPRINGS GAP FILLER ANNEX SM-16 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F599900 CORONA ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA917002471200 CORONA NOC NWAD NAVY DERA Yes Awaitin9 Results
CA99799F541900 CORONADD BEACH MIL RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002313000 CORONADO NAB NAVY DERA
CA957282463800 COSTA MESA AIR GUARD STATION AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F993000 COUNTY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F993100 COUNTY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F993400 COUNTY LANDING FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542100 COYOTE FLATS AIR STRIP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F591700 COYOTE WELLS BOMB TARGET NO.77 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542200 COYOTE WELLS GAP FIL AX P76B FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F539200 CP ANZA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F540500 CP ROSS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002757500 CROWS LANDING NALF NAVY BRAC
CA99799F525700 CUDDYBACK GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542300 CUYAMA AUX FIELD #7 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA38900 CUYAMACA TRAINING AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542400 DAGGETT ARMY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
I
i
CA997152083200 DD SAN JOAQUIN. SHARPE FACILITY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY DERA
CA997150682700 DD SAN JOAQUIN. TRACY FACILITY DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY DERA
CA99799FA39000 DEATH VALLEY NATIONAL PARK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA02400 DEATH VALLEY SALT PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F591200 DEL AMO HAZARDOUS WASTE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F711800 DEL MAR ARMY BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542500 DEL MAR-ENCINITAS FCS #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574000 DEL NORTE COUNTY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542600 DELANOARPT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542800 DESERT CENTER DIVISION CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542700 DESERT CNTR ARPT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573000 DEVILS SLIDE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573100 DEWITI GENERAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573200 DIBBLE GENERAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F591600 DIVE BMB TAR C -e FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
i,
CA99799F597300 DIVE BOMB RANGE - TRINIDAD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002327800 DIXON NRTF NAVY DERA
CA99715DL60000 DNSC MOSS LANDING DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY DERA
CA99799F542900 DOD PROJECT 112 SITE 4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F995800 DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT CO., ENGR. & RESEA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531500 DOUGLAS AIRCRAFT PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799FA39100 DOW CHEMICALS CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531600 DOWNEY FAMILY HOUSING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592300 OPT RES PLT (CA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F600300 D-Q UNIVERSITY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA29900 DRAKES BAY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543100 DRY CANYON ARTILLERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F537500 DUNLOP AUXILIARY FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573300 DURANT PARK MANEUVER AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F996600 DYCER AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F560000 DYKE-SAN DIEGO HARBOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573400 EAGLE AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F754500 EAST BOREGO BT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921402005500 EAST FORT BAKER ARMY BRAC
CA99799F525400 EAST MESA BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F525500 EAST MESA SO BOMB RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
'j'
':!!':
I
CA99799F573500 EDW CRK DRY LK TEST ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543300 EDWARDS AFB PROJ ROUND UP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957172450400 EDWARDS AIR FORCE BASE AIR FORCE DERA Yes Groundwater, soil Source - Rocket No exposure
Research 300 ppb pathway.
detected in Groundwater Groundwater
plume. An innovative not used as
ion exchange drinking
perchlorate treatment water.
technology is currently
being demonstrated at
Edwards AFB. The
groundwater underlying
Norlh Base is
contaminated by both
perchlorate and organic
solvents.
CA99799F522900 EDWARDS MILITARY AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes Detected in soil (max
detect 36000 ugiL in
plume from jet
propulsion lab)
CA99799FA35900 EGAN RG MICROWAVE RELAX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543500 EL CAJON HEIGHTS PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F754300 EL CENTRO BOMBING TARGET SITE (GILB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA07400 EL CENTRO MARINE AIR CORPS BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917oo2453000 EL CENTRO NAF NAVY DERA
CA99799F754000 EL CENTRO ROCKET TARGET NO.2 (#93) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F753900 EL CENTRO ROCKET TARGET NO.1 (#92) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
C·A99799F535000 EL SEGUNDO BATIERY SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531700 EL SEGUNDO STORAGE ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302320800 EL TORO MCAS NAVY BRAC
CA99799F573700 ELK GROVE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F863800 EMERYVILLE ORDNANCE DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39200 EUCALYPTUS PARK - ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543700 F C #2 BLUFF COVE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574100 F-83 DOS PALOS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544000 FACTORY TRAINING SCH/DOUGLAS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574200 FAIRFIELD ARMY STOR SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917000039600 FALLBROOK NOC PAC DIV DET NAVY DERA
CA99799F544200 FAMOSA AUXILIARY FIELD #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F917400 FARALLON ISLANDS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543800 FIRE CONTROL SITE#19 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543900 FIRE CONTROL STATION #12 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39300 FIRESTONE TIRE & RUBBER CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997100 FIRST MOTION PICTURE UNIT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F727800 FMC CORPORATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799F828900 FORMER NIKE SITE LA-14, LAUNCHER AR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F868600 FORT BAKER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F689300 FORT BARRY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F689700 FORT CRONKITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544600 FORT EMORY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F986100 FORT FUNSTON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921042043600 FORT HUNTER L1GGETI ARMY DERA
CA921402043600 FORT HUNTER LIGGETT BRAC ARMY BRAC
CA921402044600 FORT IRWIN . ARMY DERA
CA99799F533900 FORT MACARTHUR (UPPER RES) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F868500 FORT MASON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F582200 FORT MASON PORT OF EMB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA35800 FORT MOJAVE RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574500 FORT ORD AMB TRNG AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03900 FORT PIO PICO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544300 FORWARD RELAY STATION 1-MS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574600 FRANK VAL MIL RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574700 FRANKLIN AUX FLO #6 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE .SITES DERA
CA99799F544400 FRAZIER MT RADIO RELAY ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544500 FREDA RAILHEAD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957282590900 FRESNO AIR GUARD BASE AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F574300 FT MCDOWELL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544700 FT ROSECRANS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F533800 FT. MACARTHUR LOWER&MIDDLE RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544800 FULLERTON DAM-E FULLERTON CREE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39400 FURNANCE CREEK AIRPORT(OLD AIRPORT) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F992500 GARDNER AUXILIARY #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F544900 GARDNER FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39500 GAS STATION RESERVIOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545000 GAVILAN PLATEAU MANEUVER AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526800 GEN ENGRG & DRYDOCK CO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39600 GENERAL CHEMICAL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA39700 GENERAL METALS CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957002445300 GEORGE AFB AIR FORCE BRAC
CA99799F531800 GEORGE AFB OUTER MARKER ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F574900 GGNRA NATIONAL CEMETERY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799FA39900 GLENN COUNTY FARM FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40000 GLOBE ASBESTOS CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545100 GOFFS CAMPSITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F522200 GOLDEN GATE NATL REC AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40100 GOLER AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40200 GOLETA ARMY AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575000 GRANADA CANTONMENT AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545200 GRAND CENTRAL AIR TERMINAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F988900 GRANITE CANYON MARINE LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575200 GREAT HWY MIL RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545300 GREY BUITE AUX FLO #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545400 GRIFFITH PARK EXPERIMENTAL LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545500 GRIFFITH PARK PHOTO CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587200 GRIZZLY CREEK CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575300 GRIZZLY PEAK VHF STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592800 GUALALA BOMBING TARGET CAL. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575400 GULL LAKE REC CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA29700 GUSTINE BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921082228800 H.F.RADIO RECEIVER, SANTA ROSA ARMY DERA
CA99799F575600 HALF MOON BAY FLI STRIP FORMERLY USED DEF ENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575700 HALF MOON BAY RAD L-82 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F990500 HAMILTON - AMMO HILL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F990400 HAMILTON - PHASE II, CONTRACT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F990600 HAMILTON - WAF HILL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
oj.
CA99799F902400 HAMILTON AAF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921402303800 HAMILTON ARMY AIR FIELD ARMY BRAC
CA99799F523000 HAMILTON NORTH ANTENNA FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575800 HAMILTON TRNG ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F990300 HAMILTON-PHASE II, IN-HOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F575900 HAMMER FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576000 HAMMOND GENERAL HOSP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F991300 HANCOCK AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F863600 HANFORD WAREHOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545600 HANSEN FLOOD CONTROL BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595600 HARBOR DEFENSE UNIT, CA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40400 HARBOR VIEW HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40500 HARPERS DRY LAKE TEST ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F531900 HARVEY MACHINE CO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545700 HAWES AUXILIARY FIELD #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40600 HAWTHORNE HOUSING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F545800 HAWTHORNE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576100 HAYFORK GAP FIL AX SM157C FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576200 HAYWARD AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F999600 HAYWARD BOMB PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957262590800 HAYWARD MUNICIPAL AIRPORT AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F545900 HEAPS PEAK RAD REL STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F593000 HEATH FLD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576300 HELM AUX FLD #6 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546200 HIDDEN HILLS LAKE TEST ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40700 HIGHLAND AVE. AUXILIARY FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA07700 HILTON CALCITE MINE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546300 HOFF GENERAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526500 HOGAN DAM SURVIVAL TRNG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F626000 HOLDING AND RECONSIGNMENT POINT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
DEP
CA99799F593100 HOLLISTER NAAS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755700 HOLTVILLE ROCKET TARGET 1R (#94) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50500 HOLTVILLE ROCKET TARGET RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755600 HOLTVILLE TARGET (BT) NO.3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755400 HOLTVILLE TARGET(BT) NO.1 (#68) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F525200 HONEY LAKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546400 HOPKINS WELL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40800 HOTEL DEL CORONADO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F996100 HOWARD HUGHES AIRCRAFT MFG. CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA40900 HQ SOUTH DIST., 9TH SERVICE COMMAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546500 HQS WESTERN AREA ENG OFF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49600 HUMBOLT BAY TARGET AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592900 HUNTERS POINT ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799Fn8000 HUR SUPPORT RES. SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576400 HURON AUX FLO #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576500 HYDE WHARF STO SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002378900 IMPERIAL BEACH OLF NAVY DE~
CA99799FA01700 INDEPENDENCE AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F806000 INDEPENDENCE WAREHOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576600 INDIAN AUX FLD #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546600 INYOKERN AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F525600 IRON MTN & KILBECK HILLS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F995200 IRVINE PARK- ARMY CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576700 JACKSON BUTTE RAD REL ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA06400 JACUMBA A1RPORT- NAVY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576900 JANES GAP FIL ANX Z-157A FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546700 JET PROPULSION LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes Drinking water Source - Rocket
Research
CA99799FA02500 JOHANNESBURG LANDING FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA01500 JOHANNSEN REDUCTION PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA01600 JORGENSEN REDUCTION PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41000 JOSHUA HENDY IRON WORKS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546800 JOSHUA TREE GAP FILLER AX Z59C FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F546900 KAISER SHELL CASING PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755800 KANE SPRINGS SBT (#62) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F543400 KEELER PEAK RADAR ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547000 KEELER PEAK SHORANANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA02200 KEELER SODA PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA02100 KEELER TALC PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547100 KERN COUNTY AUXILIARY FIELD #5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41100 KERN COUNTY DEHYDRATING PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547200
KERN FIELD AUX FIELD #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532000
KINNER MOTORS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41200
KINNEY ALUMINUM CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F577000
KINSBURY AUX FLO #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F577100
KIRKLAND YD SF POE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F577200
KIRKWOOD AUX lAND FLO #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SiTES DERA
CA99799F528600
KLAMATH COMM'ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532100
KLAMATH WSS ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547300
KOBE INC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA00300
KRAMER POTASH PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549600
L.A. DISTRICT ENG OFFICE 8.YARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41300
L.S. DIST CONSTRUCTION PROJ OFFICE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS47400
LA AIR RES TRG CNTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799F547700
LA DEF AREA NIKE 88 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F548100
LA DEF AREA NIKE BAT40 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F548400
LA DEF AREA NIKE BATT 32 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS48200
LA DEF AREA NIKE BTRY 96 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547600
lA DEFENSE AREA HOUSING SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS48S00
LA DIST ENG CON PROJ OFF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F548700
LA DIST OFF 8. STRG YD-RIV FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41400
LA DlST. ENGINEER OFFICE AND YARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F548800
LA JOLLA AWS STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549300
LA PORT OF EMB WAC HSG AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549200
LA PORT OF EMBARK STA HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549400
LA PORT OF EMBARKATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41500
LA QUINTA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA I
CA99799F549S00
lA RIVER IMPR SEC VII FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549700
LAGUNA DOMINGEZ Oil SF PORT AR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS49800
LAJOlLA HERMOSA FCS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F978S00
lAKE CASITAS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS91400
LAKE CHABOT MACHINE GUN RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FAS1100
LAKE HODGES SCAR ROCKET RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS77400
LAKE PillSBURY REST CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41600
lAKESIDE UNION SCHOOL DISTRICT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FS49900
LAMONT PRISONER OF WAR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA02900
LANDING FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FS50000
LANDING Hill FCS #10 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F550100 LAWNDALE ARMY MISSILE PLANTI FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F590800 LAWR LIVERMORE NATL LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F577600 LAYTONVILLE GFA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F577900 LEM AX FLD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F578100 LEM EMER LANDING FLO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5776QO LEMOORE AUX FLD #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F578000 LEMOORE BAS FLy SCHL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002438100 LEMOORENAS NAVY DERA
CA99799F578200 LINCOLN AUX FlD A-2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41600 LINCOLN FOUNDRY CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F578300 LINCOLN LABORATORY SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F578400 LINCOLN RADIO ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA1l9799F594000LINDA VISTA MESA FIELD BOMB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA05900 LINDA VISTA VALLE'(AUX. LANDING FIE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F578500 lITILE DEVIL'S SLIDE MR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F593600 LIVERMORE GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30600 LIVERMORE RiflE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576600 LOCKWOOD GAP FIL AX Z-2A FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F550600 LOMITA FLIGHT STRIP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F550300 LOMPOCAFSZ15 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921402101200 LOMPOC BRANCH DISCIPLINARY ARMY BRAC
BARRACKS ' .1
CA99799FA02000 LONE PINE AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F550500 LONG BEA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA41900 LONG BEACH AMMUNITION LOADING PIER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F550400 LONG BEACH CA BRIGADE SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002726700 LONG BEACH NH NAVY BRAC
CA917002727200 LONG BEACH NS NAVY, BRAC
CA917002755400 LONG BEACH NS SAN PEDRO NAVY BOTH
CA917002319000 LONG BEACH NSY NAVY BRAC
CA99799F532200 LOOKOUT MT AFS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F550700 LOPEZ FLOOD CONTROL BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921180625000 LOS ALAMITOS ARMED FORCES RES. CTR. ARMY DERA
CA99799F557100 LOS ALAMITOS RADAR BOMB SCORIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F550800 LOS ANGELES AFS ANNEX NO.1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957172629600
LOS ANGELES AIR FORCE BASE AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F550900
LOS ANGELES MEDICAL DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F549000
LOS ANGELES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002316600
LOS ANGELES NMCRC NAVY DERA
CA99799F549100
LOS ANGELES ORDNANCE DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA42100
LOS ANGELES SIGNAL DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA42200
LOS ANGELES U:S.N. REPAIR DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F551 000
LOST HILLS AUXILIARY FIELD #8 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA33100
LUCERNE LAKE BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F551100
LYTLE-CAJON CREEK CHANNEL IMPR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576800
MADERAAFBZ-74 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F576900
MADERA AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594500
MADERA BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA42300
MAGNOLIA HOUING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F534600
MAIS CANYON SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F551200
MANHATTAN BEACH RAILWAY SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F551300
MANHATTAN BEACON RADAR SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA01800
MANZANAR AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA957212452700
MARCHAFB AIR FORCE BOTH
CA99799FA42700
MARCH AFB - POORMAN GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F532400 MARCH AFB ILS OUTER MARKER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F551400 MARCH AFB RIFLE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5323oo MARCH COMMUNICATION ANNEX #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA42600 MARCH DROP ZONE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F999100 MARCH FJELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F688100 MARCH LIGHT ANNEX NO.2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F523200 MARCH MILITARY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F551500 MARCH rvOR ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F551600 MARCH WATER SYSTEM ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F5941 00 MARE ISLAND NAV SHIPYARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA917002477500 MARE ISLAND NSY NAVY BRAC
CA99799F9921oo MARICOPA AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F599400 MARINE CORPS AIRSTATION MOJAVE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA03600 MARINE CORPS BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F695100 MARINE CORPS LOGISTICS BASE, BARSTO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
I,
500
f
CA99799FA06700 MARINE PARACHUTE SCHOOL LA MESA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594400 MARITIME SHIPYARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532500 MARQUARDT RAM JET DEV FACILITY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579000 MARYSVILLE ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579100 MARYSVILLE JAP REC CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957002474300 MATHERAFB AIR FORCE BRAC Mather AFB was a
BRAC round I closure
and the base is a NPL
site, so we are
performing
environmental cleanup
under the CERCLA
process with State and
Federal regUlator
oversite. We have a
groundwater plume
under Mather as a result
of AerojeUBoeing past pr
CA99799F523300 MATHER MIL AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F528800 MATHER STORAGE ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579200 MAYBERRY SLO MOORING AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534100 MC CLELLAN SRC AUX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F598800 MC SUPPLY FORWARD AX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F844900 MC SUPPLY FORWARDING ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F598500 MCASEL TORO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes Groundwater 380 ppb BRAC No exposure
pathway.
Groundwater
not used as a
drinking
water source.
CA99799F598700 MCAS HOLFMILE FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F599000 MCAS SANTA ANA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957172433700 MCCLELLAN AFB AIR FORCE BRAC
CA99799F523100 MCCLELLAN AFB OUTER MARKER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49300 MCCLELLAN AFB TEMPORARY HOUSING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
"r,:.,;,
CA99799F52B900 MCCLELLAN COMM FAC ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552500 MCPHERSON PK MICR ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA ;,
CA99799F579400 MEDICAL STORAGE DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F551700 MEMOENHAlL PEAK CAMP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43000 MENASCO MANUFACTURING CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579500 MERCED AF & AUX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579600 MERCED AUX A-3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579700 MERCED AUX FLD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579BOO MERCED AUX FLD #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F579900 MERCED JAPANESE REC CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43100 MERCO CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F224800 MEXICAN BORDER FC STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F551800 MEXICAN BORDER FCS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43300 MIDWAY DRIVE (A.KA CAUSEWAY) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OEM
CA99799F591100 MIDWAY VILLAGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA07300 MILITARY RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F6BBBOO MILL VALLEY AFB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F551900 MINTER FIELD AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552000 MIRA LOMA AIR FORCE STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552100 MIRA LOMA ENGR SUB-DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552200 MIRA LOMA QUARTERMASTER DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552300 MIRAGE AUXILIARY FIELD #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552400 MIRAGE LAKE GLIDER SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA91 7309B76500 MIRAMAR MCAS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA50300 MODOC AERIAL GUNNERY& BOMBING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
RANGE
CA917002323BOO
MOFFETT FIELD NAS NAVY BRAC
CA99799F523900
MOFFEIT MIL AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA01100
MOHAWK LEAD MINES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43500
MOJAVE ANTI-AIRCRAFT RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43600
MOJAVE GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA26200
MOJAVE GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580100
MONTAGUE MUN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F978600
MONTEREY BAY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49700
MONTEREY BAY BOMBING RANGE NO. BA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002229BOO
MONTEREY NPGS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA20500 MONTEZUMA SLOUGH FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552600 MORENO GAP FILLER ANNEX P76E FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50200 MORRO BAY-SAN SIMEON MANEUVER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
AREA
CA957282963200 MOUNT DISAPPOINTMENT RADIO RELAY AIR FORCE DERA
STATION
CA99799F590900 MOUNT LAGUNA'AF STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552700 MOUNT ORIZABA SITE 1K2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA22900 MOUNT SHASTA GAS DISPERSION TEST Sf FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580200 MT CAMPBELL RIFLE RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F524800 MT LAGUNA (GATR) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F688200 MT LAGUNA COMM FAC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580300 MT OWEN RIFLE RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OEM
CA99799F580400 MT PIERCE RAD RELY AX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552800 MT SOLEDAD VHPS & FC STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580500 MT VACA RAD RELAY STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F744000 MT. WHITNEY MILITARY RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580700 MUSSEL ROCK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526900 NAAS ARCATA-BOMBING RNG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F600100 NAAS SANTA ROSA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30300 NAAS VERNALIS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597700 NAAS VERNALIS BOMB RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592200 NAB CORONADO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F591900 NAD PORT CHICAGO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592400 NAF SALTON SEA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527400 NASALAMEDA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573900 NASARCATA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F591800 NAS COYOTE WELLS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F593800 NASLEMOORE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30500 NAS LIVERMORE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594200 NAS MIRAMAR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594300 NAS MOFFETI FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594600 NAS OAKLAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530800 NASA AREA 2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F552900 NASA FLIGHT RES CTR(EDWARDS) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43700 NATIONAL AIRCRAFT EQUIPMENT CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA43800 NATIONAL CYLINDER GAS CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F522300 NATL SEASHORE-WLDCAT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F993700 NAVAL AIR BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994800 NAVAL AIR STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03700 NAVAL AIR STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F600400 NAVAL AIR STATION MONTEREY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA07800 NAVAL AUXILIARY AIR STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F962800 NAVAL AUXILlARY AIR STAnON WATSONV FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F833100
NAVAL AUXILLARY LANDING FIELD· CRO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08200
NAVAL DESTROYER BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997700
NAVAL DIRECTION FINDER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F991400
NAVAL DIRECTION FINDER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994100
NAVAL DIRECTION FINDER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F533700
NAVAL DISPENSARY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44100
NAVAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA04900
NAVAL HOSPITAL & SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44200
NAVAL HOSPITAL UNIT 6 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44300
NAVAL HOSPITAL UNITS 2, 4 & 5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597100
NAVAL INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH AP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA ,.
CA99799F993900
NAVAL LANDING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994300
NAVAL LANDING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597200
NAVAL MATERIAL REDISTRIBUTIOIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594800
NAVAL MISSilE FACILITY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597000
NAVAL NET DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597800
NAVAL ORDNANCE LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03300
NAVAL ORDNANCE TEST STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F991800
NAVAL PETROLEUM RESERVE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08300
NAVAL RADIO COMPASS STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA05100
NAVAL RADIO STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997500
NAVAL RESERVE ARMORY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997800
NAVAL RESERVE BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595800
NAVAL STATION SAN DIEGO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594900
NAVAL TRACKING STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03500
NAVAL TRAINING STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527300
NAVAL WEAPONS CENTE CHINA lAKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes Yes No exposure
pathway.
I
CA99799F595300
NAVAL WEAPONS INDUST RES PLT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592100
NAVAL WEAPONS STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44500
NAVY ATHLETIC FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA06000
NAVY DIRIGIBLE BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F744100
NAVY SECTION BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44600
NAVY TRAINING SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553000
NEEDLES DNISION CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553100
NEEDLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553200
NEEDLES STATION HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527800
NEEDLES-LAND MGMT AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580800
NEW JERUSALEM fJV< FLO #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F580900
NEW MERCED MUN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA!19799FA44700
NEWHALL AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553300
NEWPORT BEACH FCS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F534200
NIKE 94 MCA HOUSING SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547800
NIKE BAlTERY #57 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F548300
NIKE BAlTERY 14 - SILOS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes (not Groundwater Records search will Exposure
sampled address potential FUDS pathway
by DoD) eligibility for emergent suspected.
chemicals idenlified in DoD
lelter rec'd from reg confirmation
agency. is pending.
CA99799F548000 NIKE BAlTERY 29 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F547900 NIKE BTY7.0 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F598000 NIR REPAIR OAKLAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F594700 NIRF (UNDERSEA CENTER) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595700 NIROP SACRAMENTO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527100 NIRP BERKELEY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595900 NIRP SAN FRANCISCO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597400 NIRP TAYLOR FORGE LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F527600 NIRS ALAMEDA FORGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F744300 NORCO USARC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F523500 NORTH AMERICAN AVIATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957282587800 NORTH HIGHLANDS ANGS AIR FORCE DERA
CA917009999900 NORTH IS NADEP NAVY DERA
CA917002311800 NORTH ISLAND NAS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA44800 NORTHERN TRANSPORTATION CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
.I
CA957002434500 NORTON AFB AIR FORCE BRAC The former Norton AFB
is adjacent to known
perchlorate plume
(Crafton-Redlands
Plume). Lockheed
Martin is the "owner"
(PRP) of the perchlorate
plume. They work with
federal and stale
regulatory agencies and
local water purveyors on
monitoring the nature
CA99799F534400
NORTON AFB ILS OUTER MARKER AN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F553500
NORTON AIR FORCE BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F686400
NORTON COMMUNICATION FACILITY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553600
NORTON RADIO RELAY AX. #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F532800
NORWALK AF POL DIST STATION #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553700
NORWALK AF POL RETAIL DIS #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA44900
NORWALK AIRPORT - ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002727500
NOVATO DOD HOUSING FACILITY NAVY BRAC
CA99799F527000
NSC BARSTOW-DAUGETTE ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595000
NSC POINT LOMA ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595500
NSC ROUGH & READY ISLAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F592700
NWS FALLBROOK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F596000
NWS SEAL BEACH FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes Awaiting Results
CA99799F581000
OAK AREA HOS DET HOU SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F581100
OAKLAND AREA HOSP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921352066100
OAKLAND ARMY BASE ARMY BOTH
CA99799F598100
OAKLAND DOCK & WAREHOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002477600
OAKLAND FISC NAVY BRAC
CA917002755600
OAKLAND FISC ALAMEDA ANNEX NAVY BRAC
CA99799F581200
OAKLAND MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002725400
OAKLAND NAVMEDCOM NWREG NAVY BRAC
CA99799F553800
OASIS GAP FILLER ANNEX SM164C FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F553900
OCEAN BEACH FIRECONTROLSTATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F554000
OCEANSIDE CAMP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45000
OCEANSIDE MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F554100 OCEANSIDE RADAR SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA26600 OFFICE OF STRATEGIC SERVICES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F554200 OJAI VALLEY CLUB. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45100 OLANCHA AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957112573600 ONIZUKAAS AIR FORCE BOTH Yes Not detected
CA99799F554300 ONTARIO A.N.G. TRAINING SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F686800 ONTARIO ARMY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957282591 000 ONTARIO lAP AGS AIR FORCE BRAC
CA99799FA49000 OPERATIONAL SITE NORTON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F554400 ORANGE COUNTY ARMY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581300 ORLAND AUX FLD #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581400 OROVILLE ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581500 OROVILLE GAP FIL AX P-58B FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581600 OROVILLE PRECISION BOMB RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F554500 OTAY MESA INSTALLATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49500 OUTER LANDING FIELD, COTATI FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526300 OWLS HEAD MOUNTAINS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FAJ3200 OWLSHEAD MOUNTAIN AERIAL GUNNERY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
RA
CA99799F554600 OXNARD CONTRACT SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F554800 OXNARD ILS OUTER MARK ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555000 OXNARD SEACOAST BATTERY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581700 PAC OVERSEAS AIR SVC COM FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45200 PACIFIC AVIATION INC. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA02800 PACIFIC COAST BORAX PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002454400 PACIFIC GROVE CA NRC NAVY BRAC
CA99799F595200 PACIFIC MISSILE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F581800 PACIFIC ORD STEEL FOUNDRY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45JOO PACIFIC PUMP WORKS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45400 PACIFIC STATES OIL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555100 PALM SPRINGS ARMY AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555200 PALMDALE ARMY AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555300 PALMDALE CANT AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555400 PALOS VERDES GAP FIL AX SM162D FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555500 PALOS VERDES PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F544100 PALOS VERDES WHF CONT CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
.. '
CA99799FA33400 PANAMINT BOMBING & AERIAL GUNNERY R FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F533000 PANAMINT DRY LAKE TEST FQBMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F535900 PANAMINT FLAT DRY LAKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555600 PARKER AUXILIARY FIELD #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50600 PARKS AIR FORCE BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921042213000 PARKS RESERVt:: FORCES TRAINING AREA ARMY DERA
CA99799F582000 PARR RIC TERMINAL #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F555700 PASADENA AREA SUPPORT CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917006211300 PASADENA MCRC NAVY DERA
CA99799F543600 PASO ROBLES MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA30800 PETALUMA BOMBING TARGET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA92104CAOO700 PFC LOUIS T BACCIGLIERI AFRC ARMY DERA
CA917302755300 PICO RIVERA MCRTC NAVY DERA
CA99799F582100 PILLAR POINT RESERVATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45500 PINE VALLEY CAMp· ARMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45600 PINTO PEAK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F555800 PLAYA bEL REY FIRE CONT SITE#1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45700 PLEYTE, CAMP NAVAL REPAIR BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595100 POC POINT MOLATE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957212428000 POINT ARENA AIR FORCE STATION AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F533100 POINT LOMA MISSILE TEST SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002756300 POINT MOLATE NAVY FUEL DEPOT NAVY BRAC
CA917002727100 POINT MUGU NAWS NAVY DERA
CA99799FA30100 POINT REYES GUNNERY RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556700 POINT SAL ATG GUN RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA917002422500 POINT SUR NAVFAC NAVY DERA
CA99799F556800 POINT VICENTE MIL RES FC SITES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F998900 POLARIS FLIGHT ACADEMY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F595400 POLLOCK STOCKTON SHIPBLDG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA45800 POMONA AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002421800 POMONA CA NAVRESCEN NAVY BRAC
CA917002309800 POMONA NIROP NAVY BOTH
CA99799F556000 POMONA QUARTERMASTER DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002227500 PORT HUENEME CA ENGSRVCEN NAVY BRAC
CA917002332300 PORT HUENEME NCBC NAVY DERA
!
CA99799F556100 PORT HUENEME S/COAST DEF SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F582300 PORTERVILLE ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556200 POSO AUXILIARY FIELD IIfJ FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F582400 POTTER AUX flO #5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556300 PRADO FLOOD CONTROL BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49100 PRC PATTERSON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921372060600 PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY ARMY DERA
CA921372067600 PRESIDIO OF MONTEREY (FORT ORO ANN) ARMY BRAC
CA921402079100 PRESIDIO OF SAN FRANCISCO ARMY BRAC

' "
CA99799F757900 PRESUMED BOMBING SITE FLOATING TARG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F758000 PRESUMED BOMBING SITE SAFETY AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799FA45900 PRISONER OF WAR CAMP - CAMP COOKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46000 PRISONER OF WAR CAMP (GOLETA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556400 PRODUCTION FliGH TEST AF PLT42 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F542000 PRODUCTION ROCKET ENGINE ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F757700 PROPOSED SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F757600 PROPOSED SALTON SEA BOMBING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
TARGET
CA99799F529200 PT ARENA COMM ANX #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556500 PT ARGUELLO LORAN STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F556600 PT ARGUELLO RAD SITE B-30 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99T99F582600 PT CABRILLO RAD ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F582700 PT LOBOS SEA POSiTION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99T99F582800 PT REYES OAT & ACCESS RD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99T99F582900 PT REYES LIGHTHOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F788600 PYRITE CANYON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA No Need to establish FUDS
eligibility. Records
search will also include
checking if any
perchlorate containing
items were
stored/assembled, etc
on site or if site usage
during FUDS time era
could have contributed
10 conditions.
CA99799F556900 QUARTERMASTER STORAGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA92104CA02100 QUINONES AFRC ARMY DERA
CA99799F557600 RAD STA B-5 CAM SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OEM
CA99799F557300 RADAR BOMB SCORING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583100 RADAR SITE B-76 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F557400 RADAR SITE J-41 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F557500 RADAR SITE L35 CAMP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F557000 RADAR STATION L-6 MISSION BECH FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583200 RAF VILL FAM HOUS ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F596400 RAMONA BOMBING TARGET/EMERGENY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08400 REAM AIRPORT- NAVY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583400 RED BLUFF AFS Z-157 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583500 RED BLUFF HOUSING ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F526400 RED MOUNTAIN SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583600 REDDING ARMY AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA20200 REDWOOD CITY GIBSON ENVIRONMENtAL, FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F557700 REFUGIO PASS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F522400 REQUA RADAR STA-UST FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F557800 RESERVATION POINT LA HARBOR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA '.
CA99799FA46100 RHEEM MANUFACTURING CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
t
/'j
/
..
".~~
CA99799F557900 RIALTO AMMUNITION STORAGE POIT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA Yes (not Drinking water >4 ppb to Source - Fireworks Exposure
sampled 811 ppb Facility, BF Goodrich, pathway
by DoD) Rockel Research and suspected.
Manufacturing DoD
confirmation
is pending.
CA99799F558000 RICE AIR FIELD ' FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F525800 RICE VALLEY SAND DUNES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F529500 RICHFIELD STORAGE ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583800 RICHMOND RAD BEA ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F583900 RICHMOND TANK DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA "
CA921406GB8500 RIO VISTA RES TRNG AREA ARMY BRAC
CA99799F529600 RIO VISTA STORAGE ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA921382075900 RIVERBANK ARMY AMMO PLANT ARMY DERA
CA99799FA03800 ROCKWELL FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA08600 ROHR AIRCRAFT CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES D~RA
CA99799F993600 ROOSEVELT NAVAL BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA22800 ROSEVILLE RAILROAD YARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46200 ROSS FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F980000 ROYCE DEL METALS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584000 RUCK-A-CHUCKY DAM FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584100 RUSSIAN GULCH CAMP SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994500 RYAN AERONAUTICAL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA04500 RYAN AIRCRAFT CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F999400 RYAN AIRCRAFT SCHOOL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F522700 SAC AIR DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584200 SAC ENG DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F573800 SAC ENGR AREA - WEIR AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584300 SAC MUN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584400 SAC SIGNAL DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921382078000 SACRAMENTO AD ARMY BRAC
CA99799FA50100 SACRAMENTO MUNIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F522500 SADDLE PEAK N1KE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584500 SALINAS ARMY AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584600 SALINAS GARRISON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558100 SALINE VALLEY ATA GUN RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756500 SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET (FBT 11 )(#52 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
,.
'.:i.
CA99799F756900
SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET (FBT 15)(#56 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F757000
SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET (FBT 16)(#57 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756400
SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET(1 0)(#51) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756300
SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET(9)(#50) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756600
SALTON SEA BOMB TARGET(FBT 12)(#53) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F756700
CA99799F756800
SALTON SEABOMB TARGET(FBT 14)(#55) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F757100
CA99799F757200
CA99799F757300
CA99799FA50800
SALTON SEA MECCA AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F757400
SALTON SEA SKIP BOMB TARGET (#61) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002755200
SALTON SEA TEST RANGE NAVY B~C
CA99799F558400
SALVAGE SEGREGATION CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561500
SAN ANA AIR NG RADAR RELAY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558600
SAN ANTONIA/CHINO CREEKCHANNEL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558500
SAN ANTONIO DAM FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558700
SAN BER ENGR DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558800
SAN BERNARDINO BASE GEN 0 RR#1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F558900
SAN BERNARDINO BASE GEN 0 RR2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559000
SAN BERNARDINO CWS PL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559100
SAN BERNARDINO ENG SUB-DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559300
SAN CLEMENTE ISL RADAR STA B-3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559400
SAN CLEMENTE ISL RS J-4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559500
SAN CLEMENTE ISL VHF SITE 8K2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F533200
SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND AFS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559600
SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND AFS P-39 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002753000
SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND NALF NAVY DERA
CA99799F998100
SAN CLEMENTE ISLAND NAV. RES. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559700
SAN CLEMENTE RADAR STATION X40 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559200
SAN CLEMETE ISL CAMP SITE B-3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559800
SAN DIE AF RES RECOV CIR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F559900
SAN DIEGO BARRACKS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002429000
SAN DIEGO FASWTC PAC NAVY DERA
CA917002437800
SAN DIEGO FCTC PAC NAVY DERA
CA917002428800
SAN DIEGO FISC NAVY DERA
CA99799F560100
SAN DIEGO GUN TOWER #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
{
CA99799F560200 SAN DIEGO GUN TOWER #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F560300 SAN DIEGO GUN TOWER #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5604oo SAN DIEGO GUN TOWER #4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F560500 SAN DIEGO MANUFACTURING PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302257300 SAN DIEGO MCRD NAVY BOTH
CA99799F5606oo SAN DIEGO MFG PL AX DPC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F560700 SAN DIEGO MUNlcAPL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002314400 SAN DIEGO NAVMEDCTR NAVY DERA
CA91 7002475000 SAN DIEGO NCCOSC NAVY DERA
CA9170024B0400 SAN DIEGO NCTS NAVY DERA
CA91700247B600 SAN DIEGO NISE WEST NAVY DERA
CA91700242B900 SANDIEGONS NAVY DERA
CA917002455500 SAN DIEGO NSB NAVY DE~
CA917002320200 SAN DIEGO NTC NAVY BOTH
CA99799F560BOO SAN DIEGO RIVER/MISSION BAY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA91700660 7900 SAN DIEGO SPASURFLDSTA NAVY DERA
CA99799F560900 SAN DIEGO VHF SITE 3HK3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46300 SAN DIEGO WAR HOUSING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561000 SAN FERNANDO PLAYGROUND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F599100 SAN FRANCISCO NIKE 31 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561100 SAN GABRIEL RIVER IMPROVEMENTS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F991000 SAN LUIS OBISPO AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561200 SAN MIGUEL REC SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46500 SAN MIGUEL WAR HOUSING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561300 SAN NICHOLAS AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F998000 SAN NICHOLAS ISLAND NAVAL RES. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002464000 SAN NICOLAS ISLAND OLF NAVY DEM Yes Groundwater 16 ppb No exposure
n:3thl."'::l\l
CA99799F533400 SAN PEDRO AIR FORCE STATION FORM\=RLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5B4700 SAN RAFAEL BIV AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561400 SAN YSI GAP FIL AX P76B FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561600 SANTA ANA ARMY AIR BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561 BOO SANTA ANITA ORD TRAINING CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561700 SANTA ANITA ORD TRNG CT RIF RG FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F561900 SANTA BAR L1GHTHOU RES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F691200 SANTA BARBARA MUN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F799100 SANTA BARBARA WATERFRONT UST FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA26500 SANTA CATALINA AMPHIBIAN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F596300 SANTA CATALINA IS BOMBING AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562000 SANTA FE DAM FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562100 SANTA MARIAAAF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562200 SANTA MONICA AAF REDIS STA 113 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46700 SANTA MONICA HOUSING PROJECT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F590100 SANTA MONICA MOUNTAINS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562300 SANTA MONICA MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F599200 SANTA MONICA USAR CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524400 SANTA ROSA AAF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F528400 SANTA ROSA FEDERAL CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F691700 SANTA ROSA FEDERAL RESERVE CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F533500 SANTA ROSA ISLAND AFS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534500 SANTIAGO PEAK RAD REL AX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921402282300 SAT COM ARMY DERA
CA99799FA46800 SCHRILLO AERO TOOL ENGR. CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002449100 SEAL BEACH NWS NAVY DERA
CA99799F557200 SEAL BEACH RADAR BOBM SCORING FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562400 SEARCHLIGHT BATTERY SITE #35 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F563300 SEARCHLIGHT POSITIONS 26 & 27 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA12700 SECTION BASE, S~APLANE BASE, L1GHTE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562500 SEMITROPIC AUXILIARY FIELD #5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA957282886800 SEPULVEDA AIR GUARD STATION AIR FORCE DERA
CA99799F562600 SEPULVEDA: FLOOD CONTROL BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F533600 SERYACO PEAK RADAR RELAY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584900 SF AM BATT 12 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEM
CA99799F585000 SF AM BATT 40 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F585100 SF AM BATT 61-N FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F584800 SF AF RES REC CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586100 SF MUNICIPAL AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F585200 SF NIKE 08-09 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F585300 SF NIKE 25 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F690100 SF NIKE 51 (SWEENY RIDGE) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F978700 SF NIKE 51, MALAGRA RIDGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F585400 SF NIKE BATT 37 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
"f'
CA99799F586000 SF SITE 61-R FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586200 SF TRA OCE REC STA SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F529700 SHAFTER AIR FORCE STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562700 SHAFTER AVIATION TEST ACTICITY FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F529800 SHAFTER COMM FACILITY ANNEX #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562800 SHAFTER GAP FILLER ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586300 SHARPE ARMY DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586400 SHARPE GENERAL DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F562900 SHAVERS SUMMIT AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA33000 SHEEP HOLE MOUNTAINS SONIC BOMB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DEf.'lA
TAR
CA99799FA32900 SHEEP HOLE MOUNTAINS SONIC BOMB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
TAR
CA99799FA46900 SHELL OIL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA50900 SHELTER ISLAND FIRING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F990700 SHERWOOD FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA03200 SHOSHONE LEAD MINES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921382084300 SIERRA ARMY DEPOT ARMY BOTH
CA99799FA47000 SILVER LAKE AIRFIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F828700 SILVER LAKE TEST ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5262110 SILVER PEAK NIKE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F596700 SISKIYOU BOMBING TARGET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586500 SISKIYOU COUNTY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F529900 SISKIYOU POL ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002431700 SKAGGS ISLAND NSGA NAVY DERA
CA99799F563000 SODA LAKE AIR-T'GROUND GUN RGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586600 SOLEDAD PRISONER OF WAR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F563100 SOUTH LAKE TEST CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA47100 SOUTHERN CAL. GAS CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA47200 SOUTHWESTERN ENGR. CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F563200 SPADRA GENERAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F996300 SPERRY GYROSCOPE CORP. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA47300 STANDARD OIL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F586900 STATE FAIRGROUNDS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F998600
STATE GUARD AIR FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F824400
STEAD AFB-FRENCHMAN CREEK CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587000
STINSON BEA FIRE CON STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587100
STO DIV CAN & CAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917006211700
STOCKTON CA NAVRESCEN NAVY BRAC
CA99799F523400
STOCKTON MIL AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002438200
STOCKTON NCS ' NAVY DERA
CA99799FA30400
STOCKTON ORDNANCE DEPOT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA47400
STOVEPIPE WELLS AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F863700
SUNNYVALE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002291500
SUNNYVALE NIROP NAVY DERA
CA99799F587300
SURVIVAL TRG AX SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA47500
SWEETWATER AUXILIARY FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OE~
CA99799F691100
SYCAMORE CYNfTlERRASANTA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F997000
SYNTHETIC RUBBER PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F991900
TAFT AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F563400
TECATE GAP FILLER ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA47600
TELESCOPE PEAK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA49400
TEMECULA BOMB TARGET #107 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA47700
TEMECULA BOMBING RANGE #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA47800
TEMECULA BOMBING RANGE #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F563500
TERINALM IS BAR BALLLON SHE A FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F563600
TERMINAL IS BARRAGE BAL SITE B FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F563700
THERMAL GRD AIR STA BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F587400
THIRD & ARMY ST PROP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F587500
THORNTON BEACH FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA47900
THREE SISTERS LAKE TEST ANNEX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F563800
TIERRA DEL SOL GAP FIL AXZ76C FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F599600
TITAN l-A, LINCOLN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F569800
TITAN l-B, SUTTER BUTIES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F599700
TITAN l-C, CHICO FORMERLY USED DEFENS E SITES OERA
CA99799F525100
TODD SHIPYARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F526600
TODD SHIPYARDS CORP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799FA30200
TOMALES BAY/ABBOTIS LAGOON FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
BOMBING
CA99799F563900
TORNEY GEN HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F996400
TORRANCE ALUMINUM PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
I
CA99799F996900 TORRANCE CITY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587800 TRA AFB DEF AREA HOU SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587900 TRA AFB NIKE 10 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F5881liO TRA AFB NIKE 53 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F588300 TRA RADIO BEACON AX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534700 TRABUCO BOMBING RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F587700 TRACY AUX FLD #5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F530100 TRAVIS ADM SOLANO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957182457500 TRAVIS AIR FORCE BASE AIR FORCE DERA yes Groundwater. Site 12 Dept. of Health Services No exposure
sampled pathway.
Groundwater
not used as a
drinking
water source.
CA99799F530200 TRAVIS TRAINING ANX FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F564000 TRAVIS TRAINING ANX #2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002333000 TREASURE ISLAND NS NAVY BRAC
CA917002278400 TREASURE ISLAND NS HUNTERS PT ANNEX NAVY BRAC
CA99799FA30700 TRINIDAD BOMBING TARGET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799FA00600 TRONA POTASH PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA29800 TUBBS ISLAND FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F914800 TULE LAKE POWC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F603600 TULE LAKE RECEPTION CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F588400 TURLOCK BOMB LOAD PLANT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F588500 TURLOCK REH CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302478300 TUSTIN MCAS NAVY BRAC
CA99799F564100 TUSTIN NATIL GUARD RIFLE RANGE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917302434900 TWENTYNINE PALMS MCAGCC NAVY DERA
CA99799F588600 TWO ROCK RANCH STA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F565100 U.S. ARMY RES CENTER PACOIMA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F564200 U.S. ARMY RESERVE DROP AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F992800 U.S. AUX. LANDING FIELD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48100 U.S. COAST GUARD PATROL BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
C"
CA99799F995100 U.S. NAVAL HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48200 U.S. NAVY BARRACKS (WAVES) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA02300 U.S. VANADIUM TUNGSTEN MINE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F564400 U.SAR. HUNTINGTON PARK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F564900 U.S.ARMY RESER CEN LONG BEACH FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F59gaOO UCSD (CAMP MATTHEWS) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F691300 UNIV OF CAL, SANTA BARBARA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F81 0900 UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SANTA BARB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524900 UPPER LAKE DIST NAVY CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F588800 US ARMY RES CTR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F868700 US COAST GUARO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F564300 USAR CENTER SAN DIEGO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DE~
CA99799F564500 USAR OUTDR TRAINNG AREA WH NAR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F564600 USAR TANK TRAINING MIRAMAR FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB0200 USARC BAKERSFIELD ARMY DERA , ,I
CA99799F564700 USARC BELL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB0400 USARC BELL (AMSA 15) ARMY DERA
CA921046BBOSOO USARC CAMP PENDLETON ARMY DERA
CA9210461B0600 USARC CHICO ARMY DERA
CA9210461B0700 USARC CLOVIS ARMY DERA
CA921046BB1000 USARC EL MONTE ARMY DERA
CA921046GB2600 USARC FORT ORO (AMSA 14) ARMY DERA
CA921046BB1200 USARC FRESNO (AMSA 14-G) ARMY DERA
CA99799F564800 USARC LOMPoC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB2000 USARC LONG BEACH ARMY DERA
CA921046CB2200 USARC LOS ANGELES 01 ARMY DERA
CA921046BB2400 USARC LOS ANGELES 02 ARMY DERA
CA9210461B2800 USARC MODESTO ARMY, DERA
Ci\9210463B3000 USARC MOUNTAIN VIEW ARMY DERA
CA921046BB3300 USARC NORCO ARMY DERA
CA921 042288800 USARC OAKLAND (HEROIC WAR DEAD) ARMY DERA
CA99799FS65000 USARC OUTDOOR TRNG SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB3400 USARC PASADENA, CA ARMY DERA
CA921046BB4200 USARC SAN BERNARDINO (AMSA 19G) ARMY DERA
CA921046BB4400 USARC SAN DIEGO ARMY DERA
CA921046GBS200 USARC SAN JOSE (AMSA 12) ARMY DERA
CA921046GB5600 USARC SAN PABLO ARMY DERA
CA99799F565200 USARC SANTA ANA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921046BB6000 USARC SANTA ANA ARMY DERA
CA921046BB6200 USARC SANTA BARBARA ARMY DERA
CA9210461B6600 USARC SANTA ROSA ARMY DERA
CA921046BB7100 USARC STANTON (GARDEN GROVE) ARMY DERA
CA921046GB7200 USARC SUNNYVALE ARMY DERA
CA9210463B7600 USARC UPLAND ARMY DERA
CA9210461B7600 USARC VALLEJO ARMY DERA
CA921046BB6000 USARC VAN NUYS ARMY DERA
CA99799F593900 USNAS LOS ALAMITOS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F534600 VAN NUYS AAF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F565300 VAN NUYS AIR NATIONAL GUARD FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA921042123600 VAN NUYS MAINTENANCE SHOP ARMY DEM
CA99799F565400 VAN NUYS MET AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA957112514900 VANDENBERG AIR FORCE BASE AIR FORCE DERA yes Soil. In Groundwater, Tested Soil, No exposure
maximum detected was Groundwater, Drinking pathway.
517 ugiL water - found in
Groundwater sile 6,
SLC4 in TCE plume.
CA99799F565600 VANDENBERG ILS OUTER MARKER AN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA46300 VARDS, INC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F997300 VEGA AIRCRAFT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569000 VER NAL AF SEIS LAB FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49600 VERNALIS BOMBING TARGET NO.6 FORMERLY US.ED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA49900 VERNALIS DIVE BOMB& ROCKET RNGE.7 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569100 VERNALIS PRI OF WAR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F569200 VHF SITE 4K4 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F605600 VICTORVILLE AIR FORCE BASE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F565600 VICTORVILLE PBR N-2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F565900 VICTORVILLE PBR N-3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F566000 VICTORVILLE PBR NO 1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F566400 VICTORVILLE PBR NO 13 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA '.
I~
r
CA99799F567600 VICTORVILLE PB'R NO 6 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F567100 VICTORVILLE PBR NO.2 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F567200 VICTORVILLE PBR NO. 20 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F567700 VICTORVILLE PBR NO, 7 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F566100 VICTORVILLE PBR NO.10 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568000 VICTORVILLE PBR Y FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA33300 VICTORVILLE PBR Z FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA "
CA99799F565700 VICTORVILLE PRE BOMB RANGE N-1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F567500 VICTORVILLE PRECISION BR NO 5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568200 VICTORY PIER LA POE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568300 VIDAL JUNCTI GAP FIL AX M-12BA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F589400 VINA AUX FLO #3 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F589500 VISALIA AF FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA917002752800 WARNER SPRINGS SERE CAMP NAVY DERA
CA99799F568400 WASCO AUXILIARY FIELD #1 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48400 WEBER SHOWCASE AND FIXTURE CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F589700 WEST AUX FLD #5 FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568500 WEST BASIKFIRE PROTECTIONAREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994700 WEST COAST AIR TRAINING CENTER FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568600 WEST LA AREA STATION HOSPITAL FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568700 WESTERN AIR LINES FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597600 WESTERN GEAR WORKS OF CA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F597500 WESTERN PIPE AND STEEL CO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA j' :
CA99799F589800 WESTERN REMOUNT AREA FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F811600 WHITE POINT NIKE SITE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F524200 WHITEMORE GF ANX SN-157B FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568800 WHiniER NARROWS FC BASIN FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F568900 WILEY WELLS WATER POINT (CAMA) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F590300 WILLOWS MUN AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
'"t
'I,
'U';
'-A~~ f99F569000 WILMINGTON CLA & HOLD YO FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48500 WILMINGTON COMMISSION WAREHOUSE FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F994400 WILMINGTON SHIPYARD- CONSOLIDATED S FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48700 WILSHIRE OIL CO. FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA

CA99799F728500 WILSON PARK FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA51000 WILSON ROCK ROCKET TARGET FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F590400 WINDSOR POW LABOR CAMP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755200 WINONA BT 1 (#90) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F755300 WINONA BT 2 (#91) FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799FA48800 WINTERS-DAVIS LANDING STRIP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F978200 WOMEN'S AIR CORPS FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F813300 WOOD DUMP SITE, LOMPOC FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
CA99799F845600 WOOD DUMP SITE-US FEDERAL PENITENT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F569100 WYLIE RADIO STATION FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA

CA99799F590600 YERBA BUENA ISL PROP FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F569200 YERMO HOLO & RECONS PT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F530000 YOLO COUNTY AIRPORT FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES OERA
CA99799F590700 YREKA GAP FIL fJ\)( TM180A FORMERLY USED DEFENSE SITES DERA
7
24
39
45
61
62
64
68
82
110
150
220
363
364
415
416
422
423
424
441
496
508
510
511
555
557
558
566
567
568
605
759
792
1088
1089
1210
1421
1473
1478
1479
1498
1499
1501
1502
1503
1505
1541
1542
1635
1636
1637
Belzer Documents
Unknown
From: Richard B Belzer [rbbelzer@cox net]
Sent: Monday. March 22.200404.23
To: Sandy Cotter: Col Dan Rogers. Daniel Kowalczyk. Joe Willgrng, 'Kurt Kratz' 'Jeff Cornell
Subject: draft letter requesting EO 12866 review of perchlorate RID
Untitled Attachment 040321 DOD 040321 DOD

rTER RIA ON PERCtfTER RIA ON PERCf
Message P:.l~C I of 1
Unknown
Per various requests, a solid draft. This is based on the Initial request to target the letter- to
OMS, though recent con~ersations have hinted at other audiences.
Quantified cost estimates can be made more explicit as desired. The "uncertainty factor"
approach to cost estimation is a fun concept.
A discussion of precisely what remedy DoD would seek from OMS in this letter would be
worthwhile.
':':' ...... :;: ~ ..
Richard B Belzer Regulatory Checkbook

p!eslael1~ P O. 60, .3::;:
Me. Vernon, VA ::::::::
tel. 703·78::;· ::
fax' 202·478· 2
Be ':er~::: Reg uiatc eve 'lee -<COOK. Or;: ~oblle: 70:3·20C.. v
; '-'.'. ~~'.-.;"': '

Dr. John D. Graham
Admmistrator
Office of Information and Regulatory AffaIrs
Office of Management and Bude-et
V;ashmgton. DC 20503
Dear Dr. Graham:
The Department of Defense (DoD) hereby requests that the .office of
Informatwn and Regulatory AffaIrs (OIRA) direct the Environmental
ProtectIon A.gency (EP.-\) to submIt for formal review its Reference Dose (RID)
for perchlorate, along wIth all related gUIdance documents concernmg how
the RID may be used for assessment actIvitIes, site remediation. or any other
purpose. ThIS RID is a regulator~' actIOn as that term IS defined in SectIOn
3(e) of the Order. and it IS an economIcally significant regulatory actIon as
defined by Sections 3(D(I). (2) and (4). The RID must be reviewed before it is
re'proposed. Issued. dissemmated or lIsted on EPA's Integrated Risk
InformatIOn System (IRIS).
The RID for perchlorate abo should be subject to regular rulemakmg
procedures a~ set forth under the .-\drmmstratIve Procedure ,Act (APA). 5
C.S.C. 5{)3 ..-\5 mdicated below. the Issuance. dissemmation or listIng of the
RID wIll have substantIal dIrect and mdirect effects that are automatIcally
trIggered by [he operatIon of eXIstmg federal law and regulation. There are
no other procedures under federal law to ensure due process. If necessary. the
Department respectfully request:; that OIRA. seek a written opinion from the
Department of Justice that make~ an affirmative determination that thIS
actIOn constItutes a rule or s:.tate,,; clearly why It does not.
1. ExecutIve order 12866 applies to EPA's proposed Reference Dose for

perchlorate and its generally applIcable site remediation standards.
A. The perchlorate RID and !!ener3l/~'applicable interim site

remediation standards are regulatory actions under EO 12866.
The RID for perchlorate IS clearl~' covered by the express language of

ExecutIve Order 12,866. CentralIzed renew procedure~ apply to "regulatory
actlOn:-;" that meet certam mInImUm standard~ of scope. scale or effect.
SectIOn 3(e) defines the term regulatory actIOn as meanmg
any substantIve actIon by an agtmcy (normally published in the
Federal Register that promulgates or IS expected to lead to the
1 of 9
promulgatlon of a final rule or regulatIOn. mcludmg notices of mq Ulr~'
advanced notIces of proposed rulemakmg, and notIces of propo:'E'd
rule making.
See 58 Fed. Reg. 51737-8.
The selection of an RID IS not a mere scientific exercise, but rather a
substantlve policy deCiSIOn. EPA defines the RID as
[a]n estimate (wah uncertamty spanmng perhaps an order of

magmtude) of a daily oral exposure to the human populatIOn
(mcluding sensitIve subgroups) that IS likely to be without an
apprecIable risk of deleterIOUS effects during a lifetime.
See EPA IRIS Glossary, hrrp://www.epa.govliris/gloss8.htm#r. EPA
specifies the magmtude of uncertamt~- as ten -fold ("an order of magmtude").
However. EPA does not spec1f\' whether thIS tenfold uncertainty lIes above
the RfD or below it. nor does it explam the scientific meaning of the qualifier
"perhaps". This Imbues the RfD WIth substantive policy judgment. 1\1ore
sIgnificantly. the definitIOn concerns an "appreciable" risk of "deletenous
effects"-terms for which there IS no scientific meamng and therefore is
clearly a polIcy matter. The RID is especIally rich in policy judgment
concernmg the approprIate degree of precaution.
The RID for perchlorate 1:' expected to lead to two types of regulatlons:
first. a pnmary drmkmg water standard for perchlorate under the Safe
Dnnkmg \Yater .-\ct (SD\YAJ If EPA determines that such a standard is
warranted. and second, enforceable regulatory standards for site remedIatIOn
under the ComprehensIve Ennronmental Response, Compensation and
LIabIlIty Act of 1980 (CERCL-\) and the Federal Facilities Compliance Act of
199~ (FFCAJ.
Promulgation of the RfD is an essentlal element of ascertaining

whether the magmtude of the hazard posed by perchlorate and the level of
enVIronmental exposure are sufficIenr to warrant elevation of perchlorate
from the Contaminant Candidate LIst to formal regulatory development. A
prImary dnnkmg water 'standard for perchlorate IS very likely to be
"economIcally SIgnificant" under Executlve order 12866 and "major" under
the CongressIOnal RevIew Act. Further. the RID is almost certain to be
mterpreted as an authoritanve reference for determInIng the magnitude of
baselIne human health rIsks (relevant for deciding whether regulatIOn IS
warranted under SDWA) and as the baSIS for estlmatmg benefits pursuant to
Oi\lB CIrcular A -4.
EPA has Issued generally applIcable sIte remediation standards for
perchlorate m 1992. 1995. 1999. and :2003. Although they are labeled merely
:2 of 9
as assessment f!uideJines, they contain "prO\"lSIOnal" RIDs and explIcIt
msuuctlons concernmg how to convert them into drmking water equIvalent
levels (DWELs), EPA RegIOns and States routmely use D\YELs derIved from
RIDs as the basIs for setting sIte"specific cleanup standards, \Yhether EPA
intended these documents to be mterpreted as regulator~' standards IS
irrelevant: it was hIghly predIctable that that they would have sI(,mificant
regulatory impacts and such predIctIOns have proved accurate
B. EfJA s draft RID and f!eneral~t, applicable inrerim sire remeduulOn

scandards are ripe for Executive order 12.866 review.
At such time as EPA decldes that regulatlon under SD\\'A is

warranted. it will be extremel~' difficult for any affected party to reopen
consideratIOn of the substantlve polIcy Judgments mherent m alternatIve RID
values as they relate to alternatIve drmking water standards. SimIlarly.
O,MB IS unlikely to be able to rensIt the merits of policy chQices embedded In
the RID once it IS finalized. Therefore. ExecutIve order review of'EPA's
proposed RID for perchlorate IS npe now. Failure to review it now is likely to
irreparably harm O~'1B's capacity to fully review the significant policy
Judgments embedded in a draft proposed drinking water standard.
Executive order 12.866 doe~ not provide any other mechanism for the
reVIew of generall~' applIcable remedI.1tIOn standards. Such standards would
be generated almost automatIcally after the promulgation of the final RID.
EPA ha~ ImpliCItly promulgated mt·enm remedIation standards through its
as~e~:,ment gUIdance, and ha:, not submitted these documents to OMB for
renew despite the likely magnItude of theIr implicit regulatory effects.
Procedures for JudICial renew are slmilarl~' lacking. CERCL~ §
113(kH2) denIes potentially responsible parties an adjudicatory hearIng, and
§ 113(hl delays JudiCIal reVIew until such tIme as the remedy has been
completed, RemedIes that reqUIre perpetual groundwater treatment may
never he' elIgible for judicial renew. As a federal agency. of course. DoD
cannot a\'ail itself even of these lImIted remedIes.
Therefore. reVIew of both EPA's proposed RID. and ItS generally
applIcable sIte remedIatIOn standards IS npe at thIS tIme.
30f9
C Throuf!h its ref!ula tor. I , impacts on generE/I/I' applicable site
remediation standards. EPA. 5 RID could obt-iate the need /01' a
national primar.l' drmkmf! water standard and thereb,l' prenC'nr
centralized rel'iew ofan economical/I' sijmifjcant ref!ulator. l '
actJOn.
To the extent that an RID leads to generally applIcable sIte

remedIation standards that are applied m numerous specific mstances, the
extent of perchlorate contammation will declme, As the level of
contammation declmes the likelihood that a national prImary drmking water
standard IS "warranted" also falls. IndIrect regulation through the RID and
problematic gUIdance could cause perchlorate to be removed from the
Candidate Contaminant LISt. Should thIS happen. a number of undeSIrable
procedural outcomes would occur. FIrst. a major. economically significant
regulatory actIon would escape O),IB reVIew and Its social benefits and costs
would never be estimated. Second. controversial science policy issues would
never be aIred and resolved. ThIrd. deCIsions concerning the cost -effectiveness
of perchlorate regulation would not be subjected to any scrutiny before
extraordinary public resources were expended.
D. Re1'l'ewinf! EPA 5 RID now enables OAIB to ensure and maximize

the qualif.l' ofinfluentIal information.
Delaymg O?\IB renew untIl thp end of the regulatory process not only
spverely handIcaps Its effectlvcnb~. It would undermme important data
qualIty obJectIves. The RID IS hn"ed In part on an extensive scientific
lIterature. Howe\·er. the qualIt~· of thIS Information is highly variable and
heretofore hat' not been subject to renew to ensure that applicable
InfOrmatIOn quality standard~ apply. Three of EPA's mterIm generall~'
appllcable SHc remedIatIOn standards documents were disseminated prior to
the effecllve date for informatIOn qualIty guidelines. and the fourth such
document contamed no evidencC' of prc'dIssemmatlon reVIew.
O),IB re\'iew at thIS tIme' would enable these mformation quality Issues
to be full~' vetted and addressed pnor to the promulgatlon of a final RID.
ResolutIOn of mformatIOn quallt~, I:,:"ue~ now IS fully conSIstent with Ol\1B
gUldelme~ on pre-dissemmatlOl1 re\'lew. but delaymg resolutIOn until some
future date forces these Issues to he resoh'ed through error correction
procedures. If mformatIon quallt~· rp\'IeW were delayed until after a prlmary
dnnkmg water standard had been promulgated. error correctlOn claIms
shown to be SCIentIfically Justified would be legally ImpermIssible under
SD\\'A.'s antl"backshdmg prO\'lSIOns.
4 of 9
II. EPA's Rill and generally applicable mterim site remediatIOn standard:-
have economIcally sIgmfIcant Impacts.
The Rill and site remedlatlOn gUIdance based on it have economlcall~'

slgnifrcant effects. Whether the benefIts of these standards Justify the costs
(Executive Order 12,866. ~ 1(bH6») or net benefits are maximIzed (ExecutIvE"
Order 12,866, § Ha)) cannot be ascertamed without thorough reVIew of
whether the Rill accurately charactenzes "the degree and nature of the nsks
posed" (Executlve Order 12.866, ~ HbH4).
Generally applIcable mtenm sIte remediation standards issued b~' EPA.
in 1992, 1995, 1999 and 2003 would have economIcally significant impacts as
defined m Executlve Order § 3(fi, First. they would have annual effects
exceedIng S100 millIOn. Second. they "adversely effect in a material way" the
"sector of the economy" responsIble for the production and testing of military
and space systems that utilIze perchlorate (f' U. Third. they "create a serious
InconsIstency or otherWIse mterfere WIth" DoD;s miSSIOn, which includes
prOVIdIng the trammg needed to ensure combat readiness (f' 2). Fourth. these
generally applIcable site remedIatIOn standards "raise novel, .. policy issues
anSIng out of legal mandates. the PreSIdent's prioritIes, or the principles set
forth m thIs Executive order" ('- 4'
A. The appropriate reguJator,I' baseline includes zero prior effects.
The IndIrect effects of remedl:l tlon standards are usually ignored in

EP.-\·~ regulator~' anal)'sIs of th(' Impacts of pnmary drinking water
standard~. The~' are always Ignored for setting Rills and interIm site
remedIation standards
The usual JustifIcatIOn for L'xcludmg these impacts is that remediatIOn
cost.s are nttributable to the :\'atlOnal ContIngenc~' Plan (NCP) and not to a
dnnkmg water standard. The cost of the !\:CP is notOrIously underestimated.
but even the best analytIC effort could not account for effects that occur after
the :\CP I~ revu;;ed. For regulntory accountIng purposes, what matters is that
all regulator~' costs are counted preCIsely once. For both simplIcIty and
concretenes:-. site remedIatIOn costs assocIated with newly finalIzed RIDs
should be counted at the time EPA takes actIon on the RID.
Therefore. m prmclple EP.-\ should have estlmated regulatory impacts
m 1992. 1995. 1999 and 2003 when It promulgated generally applicable SIte
f(>medlatlon standards. Because It dId not do so. no regulatory impacts have
been accounted for to date. If EP.-\ were to deCIde not to promulgate a
natIOnal pnmary drmkmg water standard for perchlorate, there would be no
record of SOCIal costs and benefIts e\'en if a drmkIng water standard proved
;) of 9
unwarranted precIsely becCluse bIlhon~ of dollars had already been pXlwl1dpd
on site remedIatIOn.
For these reasons. a zero"nnpact baseline IS appropnate for estlmatIng
the regulatory Impacts of perchlorate regulatIOn.
B. Perchlorate ref!ulatJon has impacts exceeding S100 nllJiJon per

year.
EPA has not disseminated any estlmate of regulatory Impacts and

Ignores such informatIon when chOOSIng an RfD. As EPA's definitIOn makes
clear. the RiD IS mtended to be an estlmate of zero or near'zero nsk to every
member of the population. EPA. doe~ not account for costs, technical
feasibility, or other Impacts such as substitution risks in its selection of the
RID. At the same tIme. the RID has no statutory baSIS so there are no
statutory rest fictIOns govermng the CrItena EPA must use in chOOSIng among
alternatIve RfD values. SImIlarly. EPAs interim site remediation standards
do not Include any conSIderatIOn of these factors.
000 has esumated a subset of the likely costs assocIated with
alternatIve perchlorate RID D\\"ELs rangmg from 1 ppb to 200 ppb, for a
subset of likely cleanup sites. Acro~s 188 of 6xx sites, estImated costs rise
exponentlall~' as the D\\"EL approaches 1 ppb, reaching approximately £14
bil1lOn for IOn exchange and S3 billIOn for ex SHU bIOremediation. (Ion
exchangf.: IS likely to be reqUIred 11l any Instance where the water being
remedwted IS dnnkIng water. I
C lncorporatin{: unccrramt!· mw cost estimates.

These cost estImates are nece."saril~· uncertain, and In almost every
respect the likel~' effect of uncert[llnt~· IS to understate likely costs. \\"hen
choosmg an RID. EPA has an establIshed procedure for applymg several
uncertamt~· factors to a "pomt of departure" that itself was derived from
sCIentlfic endence ofnsk (usuall~' the Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level.
or LOAEL). Analogous method:- can be used to account for uncertamt~· on the
cost sIde.
1. Cncertamt~· with respect to the volume of groundwater
that must bf.' treated at each speCIfIC sIte (UFd.
For each sHe m DoD's Inventor!' for whIch perchlorate samplIng data
are avaIlable, groundwater equal to one acre·foot per acre IS assumed to
reqUIre treatment. The area of contammatIOn IS also uncertain due to limited
data. and perchlorate IS hIghly mohIl£' In groundwater. Based on the
expenence of 000 engmeers. uncertamty concernmg the volume of
6 of 9
~roundv\'ater requinng treatment defined a~ Cf\. IS likely to h0 factur of;-,'
10.
<) CncertaInty wIth respect to the number of sHes that
reqUlre treatment (Cfs).
DoD has sampling data from 118 installatIons mdlcatIng 1:28 separate
contammated sites. DoD IS mlssmg data from another 4xx mstallatIOns. In
some cases. no samplmg was performed because perchlorate was not expected
to he detected. In other cases. however. perchlorate IS likely to have been
detected If samplmg had occurred. Based on the expenence of DoD
remedIatIOn specIalists. uncertamty concernmg the number of mstallatlOns
at whIch perchlorate IS expected to be found once samplmg is performed.
defined as l':'fs. IS likely to be a factor of 3.
3. Cncertamty with respect to Formerly Used Defense SItes
(fCDSJ and Base Reahgnment and Closure (BR..-\C) Sites
(l'fr and Cfll).
TYPiCally. few data eXIst for FeDS and BRAe sites because
perchlorate was not a contamInant of concern when they were removed from
m\'entor~·. Of the 128 sItes In DoD':, sample with sampling data, 12 were
fl"DS of whIch 5 were POSltI\'l' One or more sItes at 12 out of 13 BRAC
mstallatlon:" also were POSltl\'C. Becausp there are thousands of FCDS at
whIch perchlorate mIght be detccf(·d the potential for massive mcreases in
cost cannot be understated. Thl' calculCHlOn below assumes that values for
l"f:: (uncertamty about thl' cost of JlPrchlorate remediation at FCDS) and
Cfj', (uncertaInty about the' cost of perchlorate remediation at BR..-\C sites)
an' each 3. hut they could easIl~' bl' much ~reater.
-1. l·ncertamt~· with respect to the cost of cleaning up other
medw beSIdes groundwater and ensuring source control
(L;Fo~l)
DoD's co:-;t estimates are hased on remediatmg groundwater only.

!\Ian~'sItes have contammated salls. and some have contammated surfacl'
waters. storm waters and sedIments. In addmon. all groundwater treatment
costs exclude the cost of sourcp contra}:; that would ue needed to ensure that
no addItlOnal perchlorate enters thp contamInated zone. ThIS uncertamty ..
defined as UFo~l. IS assumed to bl' a factor of 3 but could m fact be much
greater.
Ll. SummanzInl: the effects of uncertamty.
DoD's prehmmary estImate of the cost of compl~'mg with EPA's
proposed Rill for perchlorate (D\rEL equals 1 ppbJ at 118 installatIOns
covenng 128 sItes for whIch samplmg data IS available IS $3 billwn to S14
i of9
billion. depending on the technology applIed. r-.lethods analogous to what EP.-\
uses to derIve the RID can be applIed to derIve a cost estlmate that capt ure::
most uncertainties. This method yIelds the following cost range based on (l
composIte uncertamty factor of 243:
Cost range = ($3 billion to $14 billion) x UF\·x UFsx UFf x CFRX
UFOM.
= ($3 bilhon to S14 billion) x 3 x 3 X 3 x 3 x 3.
= ($3 bilhon to S14 billlOn) x 243.
= $729 billIon to $3.400 billion.
Remo\'ing excess preciSIOn by roundmg 243 up to 300 yields'
apprOXImate cost estImates of S900 billion to $4.200 billion.
D. Unquantified costs.
DoD acknowledges that ItS prelimmary cost estimates are highly

uncertam. However. no quantItatlve estlmates of cost are available for a
number of significant categories of cost. Examples include, but are not
lImIted to:
• Complex remedlatlOn sItuations. such as treating plumes
WIth cO'mIn?led contamInants
• PrIvate sector remedIatIOn costs
• Lmgatlon cost~. IncludIng litigation for property damages
and personal mJune~ as permitted by law
• Regulatory permit costs
• The cost of treatmg or replacing drinking water on DoD
installa tIOns and offsne where DoD activities are responsible
for contammatlon
• The cost of treatmg all water in the Colorado River if EPA
selects an RID below levels found therem
• Operational costs assocIated with changes needed to
manufacture perchlorate and develop. test. qualify. and use
of weapon system~ contaInIng perchlorate compounds m
ways that do not ~'Ield new contamination
• Costs of fully characterIzIng the occupational. operational.
human health envIronmental rIsks of potential alternatives
prIOr to theIr adoptIOn as replacement energetIC compounds.
mcludmg the cost of securing prior EPA approval
80f9
• The costs associated with the development. manufacture
test. qualificatIon. and use of alternatives to perchlorate
compounds prOVIded that the integrated. life'cycle risks of
one or more substitutes IS proved to be less than that for
perchlorate
III. A comprehensive Regulatory Impact Analysis must be prepared prior

to agency decision making.
Executive Order 12.866 requires that a complete Regulatory Impact

AnalysIs be performed prior to making critical regulatory policy decisIOns.
mcludmg polIcy decisions such as those embedded in the choice among
alternative RID values. As we indicated at the outset, even if the choice of an
RID IS mformed by science a host of nonscientific policy choices is also
included in such a regulatory actlon. Given the magnitude of effects likely to
occur as the result of selectmg an RfD for perchlorate. a highly
comprehensIve RIA mcludmg formal uncertainty analysis is warranted.
This RIA should use as its baselme for estimating effects the state of
the world prior to any matenal agency regulatory action, plan to develop such
actIOn. or the issuance of any gUIdance that triggered action. To the extent
feasible. the costs and benefits of each of EPA's generally applicable interim
SIte remediation standard (mcludmg the mternally referenced provisional
RID> should be assessed.
DoD proposes that an mdependent. external entity skilled in benefIt·
cost analysis be contracted to develop the framework for this RIA. Included in
thIS framework should be all matenal elements of OMB Circular A '4. The
RIA development process ought to be conducted publicly in a way that
exceeds the requIrements of the Federal AdVIsory Committee Act. From the
outset thIS framework should maXImIze adherence to the highest
government'wIde mformatIOn qualIty standards and incorporate early and
frequent peer reVIew in accordance with OMB's government'wide guidelines.
Once consensus stakeholder a~eement has been achieved on the
framework, the RIA should be performed (by the sa~e or another
mdependent entity) in a transparent. reproducible, and objective manner.
I\'. Conclusion
90f9
Message Page 1 of 3
Unknown
From: Atkins, Angela G Ms ACSIM/SMllnc.

Sent: Monday January 13. 2003 12 17
To: Newsome. Richard E Mr ASA-I&E. Cotter Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
Cc: Moeller Dale Mr ASA-I&E
Subject: RE Draft Testimony klk 0, -10-03 dOC
Our pnor testimony input is attached.
From: Newsome, Richard E Mr ASA-I&E
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 12:10 PM
To: Cotter, Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
Cc: Moeller, Dale Mr ASA-I&E; Atkins, Angela G Ms ACSIM/SMI Inc.
Subject: FVV: Draft Testimony klk 01-1O-03.doc
Importance: High
Rick
From: Moeller, Dale Mr ASA-I&E
Sent: Monday, January 13, 2003 11:37 AM
To: Newsome, Richard E Mr ASA-I&E
Subject: FW: Draft Testimony klk 01-10-03 .doc
Importance: High
Dale
-----Origina I Message----
From: Atkins, Angela'G Ms ACSIM/SMI Inc.
sent: Friday, January 10, 20033:53 PM
To: Read, Marcia W Ms ASA-I&E; Moeller, Dale Mr ASA-I&E
Cc: Garg, Malcolm J ACSIM/CH2M HILL; Ganta, Krishna Mr ACSIMi Holsinger, Shawn Mr; Mick Major (E
Message Page :2 of 3
mail)
Subject: RE: Draft Testimony klk GI-1G-D3.doc
MarciafDale
Angela G. Atkins
From: Read, Marcia W Ms ASA-I&E
Sent: Friday, January la, 2003 2:57 PM
To: Atkins, Angela G Ms ACSIM/SMI Inc.
Cc: Moeller, Dale Mr ASA-I&E
Subject: RE: Draft Te$timony klk 01-10-03.doc
OK. please talk to Dale and let him know what's going on. I need to leave for the day
Marcia
-----OrigHial Message----
From: AtkinS, Angela G Ms ACSIIIo1/SMI Inc.
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Read, 1'1arcia W Ms ASA-I&E
Subject: RE: Draft Testimony klk al-lO-03.doc
will be back at my
desk by 1500
-----Onginal Message----
From: Read, MarCia W Ms ASA-I&E
sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 2: 15 PM
To: Kingery, Kristine M Ms ACSIM; Moeller, Dale Mr ASA-I&E; Van Brocklin, Connie H
Ms ACSIM; Bell, David E Mr OGe; Atkins, Angela G Ms ACSIM/SMI Inc.; Holsinger,
Shawn M'r .
Cc:Buescher, John Mr ASA-I&E
Subject: FW: Draft Testimony klk 01-10-03.doc
Please revIew and provide cmts to Dale Moeller in this office ASAP
Thanks.
Marcia
From: Cotter, Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
Sent: Friday, January la, 2003 1:49 PM
To: Yaroschak, Paul J; Newsome, Richard E Mr ASA-I&E; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col.,
SAFIIE; 'Lillo, Dennis'
Cc: Cullison, Geoffrey D; Read, Marcia W Ms ASA-I&E; Buescher, John Mr ASA-l&E;
Rogers, Daniel Lt Col AFLSA/PR; Kratz, Kurt OSD-ATL
Subject: FW: Draft Testimony klk Ol-lO-c3.doc
Message Page 3 of3
sc
From: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL
Sent: Friday, January 10, 2003 1:25 PM
To: Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL; 'Kowalczyk Daniel'; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAFflE;
Richard B. Belzer, Ph.D.; Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGC
Subject: Draft Testimony klk Ol-lO-03.doc
Please comment Sanoy send to Services for coord

Thx.
Kurt
9 Januar, 200~
POI1\T PAPER
SUBJECT: Points about Perchlorate to be addressed during DOD Testjmon~ to the Califomia Senate:
I. Perchlorate serves as an oxidizer in rockets and missile fuel and in many pyrotechnic formulations.
Once released to the environment. the high water solubili~ and poor retention of perchlorate in soil
facilitates rapid leaching to groundwater Due to recent advances in the analytical quantification methods
for perchlorate it has now been found in at least 20 states and is being detected in the ground\\ ater at
some DOD installations. Perchlorate has high stabili~' in aerobic groundwater and tends to persl~t In
these eO' ironments for decades. Re\le\\ of the current literature on the toxici~ of perchlorate indicates
that the sole mechanism oftoxici~' of this compound involves inhibition of the nonnal absorption of
iodine. This inhibition primarily affects iodine uptake by the thyroid. .
-- :. The most serious DOD releases have occurred in conjunction with Air Force-contractor acti\·ities
involving maintenance and demilitarization of large rocket motors. The Air Force is the DOD lead
agenc~ in the evaluation of the toxici~ of perchlorate and has been involved in the effort to develop a
chronic oral Reference Dose (RID) for over a decade. The Anny and Navy are involved in the process
through a DOD perchlorate-working group
J. The US EPA and the State of Cali fomi a reg.ulatory community have independently developed draft
guidance for permissible levels of perchlorate 10 drinking water. The two draft Risk Assessments were
prepared at roughly the same time but represent di\ergent viewpoints. The USEPA selected a rodent
slUd~ (Argus Research Laboratories Inc. 20011 on which to derive their draft drinking water value of
Ippb. Although the study was well done and rigorous. serious questions remain about both the study
design and the methods used to collect the data In addition. rodents are believed to be poor models for
thyroid function in humans because of their greater sensitivi~' to thyroid toxicants. The California
regulators chose a recent study done \\ ith human \ olunteers as the starting point for derivation of their
RiD and corresponding drinking \\ater range of': ppb to 6 ppb. This study was unusual in that it used
human subJects and it also exammed the prtmar: effect (perchlorate inhibition of the active transport of
Iodine by the sodium'iodide symponer in the thyroid).
4. The DoD toxicolog.lsts consider the California Draft Risk Assessment to be superior to the USEPA
assessment for the purposes of deriving a regulator: limit for perchlorate in drinking water. However.
both risk assessments yield ver:' conser,atl\'e drinking water values. It is estimated that healthy adults
consuming a nonnal American diet would have no adverse effect from ingestion of drinking water even at
concentrations of perch 10rate of 2-80 ppb. The 10\\ er values seen in the draft risk assessments arise
primari Iy because of uncertainty factors employed In the risk assessments because of Icck of data on the
effects of perch lorate on individuals with thyroid disease and for the protection of the fetus during.
pregnanc~. Implementation of the current draft values would affect the use of perch lorate--containing
pyrotechnic devices in training at Army Installations. The affect on Air Force and Navy operations would
be much more serious as perchlorate is a major component in rocket fuel and efforts to find a substitute
compound have been unsuccessful.
5. 000 effons to obtain higher regulator: limits on perchlorate focus on improving the current draft risk
assessments advanced by the USEPA and the State of California. The 000 scientists of the perchlorate
working group and toxicologists representing the perchlorate industry met for two days in late December.
The 000 scientIsts were able to reach consensus on the majority of the scientific issues relating to
perchlorate and proposed a plan of action to work with the EPA to develop a bener and more realistic risk
assessment. At the close of the meeting Mr. Kratz (000 chief of cleanup) chaired a sessi~n where the
scientists and the public affairs representatives presented their progress. He was receptive to the idea of
, renewinoe our efforts with the EPA and said he would like to bel!in
_ these neootiations
e at his level
6. The 000 is no" considering whether it will ask the EPA to withdraw the current draft risk assessment
and their proposed drinking water value and allow the 000 to submit further research to bener address
the uncertainty in the toxic effects of perchlorate. The additional data will support a change to increase
the allowable limits of perchlorate in drinking water. The 000 perchlorate-working group is currently
preparing a position paper on the scientific issues and a plan for ney.· testing that will address the current
concerns of the EPA about gaps in the perchlorate toxicological database. Due to the potential for
disagreement berwee.n the 000 and the EPA on the establishment of regulatory values for perchlorate in
drinking water. the National Academy of SCience' s Comminee on Toxicology (COT) was tasked by the
Air Force to review the available data. make recommendations for additional studies and propose safe
human health exposure values if sufficient data exists.
7. There is currently no federal drinking water maximum contaminant level (MCl) for perchlorate, and
-'such regulatory values are normally required to justify the costs of sampling for the presence of toxicants
on military reservations. However. On 13 Nov 2002', Mr. John Woodley, Jr.. Assistant Deputy Under
Secretary of Defense (Environment). signed a memorandum stating that "000 components may ascertain
and assess for perchlorate if there is a reasonable basis to suspect both a potential presence of perchlorate
and a pathway on their installations where II could threaten public health." This memorandum was
provided to the Deputy Assistant Secretaries of the Army, Navy, and Air Force, in addition to the Support
Services Director of the Defense log.istics Agenc~. Implemertation of this directive has been difficult
because the existing validated method for quantification of perchlorate in drinking water could only
quantify perchlorate when present in concentrations equal to or greater than 4 ppb. Thus the EPA's draft
drinking water value of 1 ppb was not quantifiable. Since early 2002, the EPA laboratories and other
commercial laboratories have reportedly reduced the minimum reporting limit to 1-2 ppb and several
commercial labs are now detecting perchlorate ~t less than 1 ppb. Efforts to remove perchlorate from
drinking water have been successfu I and se\ era I methods are now available that can reduce concentration
in drinking water to non-detectable levels
8. In summar:. substantial changes are anticIpated 10 the areas of toxicology and in the risk assessment
and continued Improvement in the analytIcal methodology is anticipated. Withdrawal of the current EPA
risk assessment could be accomplished in the near tenn and new toxicity studies could be done in about a
year after the research plan is agreed to and funding for the work is secured. In the interim. DOD will
take prudent steps to learn more about \\ here perchlorate contamination exists and potential impacts on
human health.
Page I of~
Unknown
From: Cotter. Sandra, Ms. OSD-ATL

Sent: Wednesday, April 16,2003 1605
To: 'Richard B. Belzer PhD' 'Kowalczyk Daniel'
Cc: Pat Ferrebee (E-mail)W.eszek.Vlctor.Mr.OSD-ATL.Choudhury.Shah.Mr. OSD-ATL. Kratz Kun,
, OSD-ATL; Turkeltaub. Robert. Mr OSD-ATL
SUbject: FW FelDstein/Boxer/Reid Letter on Perchlorate
Rick, Dave.
Please see Army comments I'll be out of the office tomorrow, but will be back in on Friday Please revIse per
Ben Cohen's prepared testimony. sent to you orevlously. Paul Yaroschak's comments. and Army comments, and
provide reVised draft back to Pat Ferrebee and VIC Wleszek tomorrow, AM, They will send out revised version out
to components for review and comment
SC
From: Bell, David E Mr OGC [mailto
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 3:51 PM

To: Read, Marcia W Ms ASA-I&E; Teller, Craig E COL LITCTR
Cc: Holsinger Nathan S. [Shawn] [TRADOC) (E-mail); Lovejoy, James K COL OCLL; Mahon Jack Mr. (E-mail);
Steffen Phillip (E-mail); Ganta, Krishna Mr ASA-l&E; Buescher, John Mr ASA-I&E; Cotter Sandra (E-mail); Cohen,
Ben Mr DoD OGC
Subject: FW: Feinstein/Boxer/Reid Letter on Perchlorate
Marcia _
Please see my embedded comments and edits We need to be very careful NOT to fall into the trap that
perchlorate is per se a HS sUbject to CERCLA I also note my discomfort with suggesting that RCRA could be
used -- don't think It'S necessary to go there I would limit the response to one similar to Ben's testimony.
Dave
Ali-
Please review the attached proposed reply and prOVide cmts/concurrence 'to John Buescher by Thursday. April
17
Malt--Can you consolidate cmts and provide to Sandy Cotter?

MarCia
From: Cotter, Sandra Ms OSD-ATL
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 11:55 AM
To: Kratz, Kurt OSD-ATL; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAF/lE; Cohen, Ben Mr DoD OGC; Choudhury, Shah Mr OSD-ATL;
Marqusee, Jeffrey Dr OSD-ATL; Yaroschak, Paul J IE' Ganta, Krishna Mr ASA-I&E; Read, Marcia W Ms ASA-I&E
Cc: 'Richard B. Belzer PhD'; Cullison, Geoffrey D Mr OPNAV; Ferrebee, Patricia Ms
OSD-ATL; Turkeltaub, Robert Mr OSD-ATL; Wieszek, Vietor Mr OSD-ATL
Subject: Feinstein/Boxer/Reid Letter on Perchlorate
Page ~ of::
All,
Attached IS letter to SecDef from Senators Boxer, Feinstein, and Reid on perchlorate, and a preliminary man
response prepared by Booz-Allen The letter was apparently mistakenly directed to Army for SecArmy resporse
I've asked for Army to redirect the action to our office, as directed by Kurt and Will ask for an extension hOwev€"
It likely won't be extended much beyond Army's due date of tomorrow Please review and commen: on tile
response
Jeff Marqusee: Kurt asked that if nol mentioned In our response could you add language about 525 M the
Department has put towards technology development?
Thanks,
SC
04/16/03 11:14 FAX 703 614 5442 HQDA ODASA ESOB fl 003
r
SE~ '~.
*
~nitrb ~bIU9 ~mate
WASttIHOTON. DC IOI'~"
April 2, 2003
2l!l) Ar~ I 5 1:1 '2= Q2
The Honorable Donald Rurnsfeld

Secretary of Defense
DcpllI'tment of Defense
The Pentagon
Washington, DC 20301 .
Dear Secretary Rumsfeld~
We write you to request that the Departm.c:ct ofDefense take a more

aggressive: aDd positive role in cleaning up dcf~-related perchlorate
contaminated water 6upplics in as many as 22 states from Califomi.a and Nevada to
Massachusetts and Maryland
We arc s~l)' cOnc:med that the Department·, propo5Cld exmnption from

environmental laws wi111imit its responsibility to clean up PQn:h1orate.The slate
officials who are..swarn to protect their citizens' drinking water from perchlorate
and other threau have expressed alarm that tbel! efforts will be preempted by your
amendment. See Sbltcment of Ed wiD F.lowry, Director, California Dcpartmtnr of
Toxic; Sub:rtaDcos Control Prepared for the IlouEe Committ~P. on Armed Services,
~adiness Subcommittee (March 13,2003); Letter from Colorado Attorney
General Ken SalUllI' to the Honorable Bob Sqrith, Senate Cotmnittee on
EU'firUDLUCQt & Public Works (Dec. 30, 2002~. This is a itcrious matter, because
perchlorate can impair thyroid funcnonmg and affect the physical arid mental
development of children.
To the best of our knowledge, nearly all the perchlorate produced in the
United States over the last half century was used by the Department and our space
program. This means that if the Defense Department ducks Yasponsibility tor ItS
actions here, the bl.1rden will faU OD hundreds of America's oommunities, whose
residents will face not only contamination ofthcir drinkina water but the
staggering costB of cleaning up a problem they did Dot create. This is completely
unacecptable.
'U05615 03'
00/170'd
04/16/03 11:14 FAX 703 614 5442 HQDA ODASA ESDII [lj 004
The 1'Wn tnnh is that the Department ofDefense has loog been not only the
primary consumer ofperchJorate, but also intunately involved m its manufacturing.
For eumple, between 1951 and 1962 the U.S. Navy owned and contr&cted for the
operation of the largut perehlorate production facility in 1be COUDtry located in
Hendman. Nevada. EVtII after relinquishing its ownc:r&hip of the {eciIlty, the
Department and its contractors continued to be the primary custorDt:TS of its
pcrc.h1orate. Perchlor.ll.c: from this facility is l~3Cbing into LUe Mead and the
Colorado River, unpaeting water supp1J.C$ in California, Arizona and Nevada.
While aggressive cleanup efforts are underway at the site. we are very conc~ ._.-.•. -- '
that the DepartmeDt has not aeuvcly engaged in ctmtn"butiDg to that elanup.
The DcpartrneDt has also bee:n involved in many other aerious perchlorate
contamination sit~s in our states. The California Department of Hcaltb ServiceJ
11M detected perchlorate in 292 public groundwater wells. the majority of which
aTe 10cated near facilities operated by the Department OJ its contractors.
The Defense Department has said that it is not willing to start clean-up of
per-enlonte until there i& a national standard. but final..izing the standard is ourrently
projected to take years. It is unacceptable for the Defense Department to adopt this
delay strategy while private parties and drm.king water utiliuc£ adopt costly
DWiI~CS to assure the punty of dnnkinS "'l\~e,. &UPplic.s. Campania havoalreedy
spent millions on pnonty actions to reduce the rbrcat to AmcricaD! - and we urge
the Defense Department to do so as well.
One obvious priority effort is to try to stem the flow of~chlorate into the
Colorado River from the Htndcr30n facility dcsc:ribed above. Kerr-McGee, which
'operated the facility after the Defense Department, b.aa built & statc-of-1hc an ion
exchange facility and lakeD oth=- mcasl.ires in'an. attempt to addnlss the problem.
Yet the Def~ Department has done nothiJ1s. The fc:dcral SOVemment cannot sit
idly by where its ac;ooDs are affectiDg the qualITy ot our drinking water. .
We request that the Deparanont report bad to us on the top priority rites
around the COWltry for it to reduce perchlorate contamination in drinking Water,
and what initial measures the Department would take in Califomil, Nevada,
Anzona, Texu and other states, given available funding. We expect aserious md
detailed response as warrants II potential threAt to American!!' health.
8l:VS0'd
._-------------------------------
04116/03 1'1: 15 FAX 70:1 614 5442 ElQVA ODASA ESOU ~ ons
We hope that you will join us in the ipirit of cooperation to address this
important issue, We look forward to hearing.from you as soon as possible.
Sincerely,
£le/90'c
Dear Senator XXXXX,
Thank you for your recent letter in which you expressed concerns about the
relationship between the Department of Defense's proposed Readiness and Range
Preservation Initiative (RPPI) and perchlorate. Let me begin b~' stating that the
Department is committed to sustaining U.s. test and training capabilities in a manner
that fully satisfies fRa.+..its militar~; readiness mission, is protective of public health, and
provides exemplary stewardship of the lands and natural resources entrusted to the
DoD by Congress.
RPPI and Perchlorate
Some observers have expressed concern that the Department's proposed RPPI
legislation could intentionally or unintentionally affect our financial liability or cleanup
responsibilities with respect to perchlorate. Let me assure you that nothing in RPPI will
affect the Department's financial, cleanup, or operational obligations with respect to
perchlorate or any other chemical.
b nJer Section J Oh of the Comprehensive Environmental Response,

C()mpen~;iltion, and Liability Act (CERCL:\), EPA has the authority to "issu[e] such
ordeE; a~; ma~' be Ilecessar~' to protect public health and \ve1tare and the environment"
whenc\'er it "determines that thert:" R'hl~' bL' an imminent and substantial endangerment
ttl the public health or '....eHart:? or the elwironment becaw;e of an actual or tJ.'reoft'/Ied
reh:Wil' of a hazardow; substance from a facility." Such order!. are in addition to
injunctive relief, and are enforceable b~' finl'" of SJ5,OOO t1 day. Nothing in the program
affech EPA'!, authority to is!;ue !;uch orJcf!;. And because EPA'~; sweeping !;ection 106
authorit:,· ((weI'S not only actual but "threatened reJea!.e," our proposal 'Nould therefore
clearly' enable EPA to addres!i ground ..•..ater contamination hefort' the contamination
lea\'e~·j DoD land which b also the objective of DoD'~; existing management policies.
Section 100 would also clearly ((weI' on range threats fWA) perchlorate or any other
chemical.
In addition, nothing in RPPI affects the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), which
provides that EPA" upon receipt of information that a contaminant which is present or'
IS likely to enter a public water system or an underground source of drinking water may
present an imminent and substantial endangerment to the health of persons ... may take
such actions as [EPA] may deem necessary to protect the health of such persons,"
enforceable by civil penalties of up to 515;000 a day. Because this SDWA authority is
not limited to CERCLA "releases" or off-range migration, it clearly empowers EPA to
issue orders to address endangerment either on-range or off-range, and to address
possible contamination before it migrates off-range. In the event that perchlorate or any
other contamination from munitions migrates off range, states and citizens EanjJ~,e
Resource Conservation and Recoven' /\ct (RCRA) authority if the contamination i., Iwt
addressed under CERCU\, as discussed aboH'. Such RCgA authorit~' "...ould include
on range measures needed to retires:; the migration.
Some commentators have also expressed concern that our RRPI proposal would
create a legal regime that barred regulators from addressing contamination until it
reached the fencelines of our ranges, or that it at least reflects a DoD policy to defer any
action until that point. As the abo".e discussion makes clear, EPA's continuing
authority under the Safe Drinking Water Act to prevent likely contamination and under
section 106 of CERCLA to address threatened releases of hazardous substances clearly
empower the Agency to act before contamination leaves DoD ranges. In addition,
States and citizens exercising RCgA authority under our gRPI ReRA provision
addressing off range migration could use that authority to enforce on range measures
neces~;ary to redress the migration. Finally, it is most definitely not DoD policy to defer
action on groundwater contamination until it reaches the fencelines of our operational
ranges, when it will be far more difficult and expensive to address. To the contrary, on
November 13,2002, DoD issued a perchlorate assessment policy authorizing asessment
"if there is a reasonable basis to suspect both a potential presence of perchlorate and a
pathway on [ ] installation[s] where it could threaten public health."
The Use of Sound Science in the Risk Setting Process
Since 1997, the Department, in partnership with EPA, NASA, State and local
regulators, and Native American tribes, has worked aggressively to identify what the
hazard from perchlorate is to the American public, and to inform and involve
stakeholders about developments in the technical and regulatory arenas. Central to this
effort has been the commitment to use sound science to generate credible decisions,
including accurate risk characterization and appropriate risk management strategies.
The Department has been at the forefront of perchlorate research, and has
invested over 525 million to better characterize the potential human health and
environmental risks associated with perchlorate, and to develop innovative treatment
technologies. DoD worked closely with EPA to establish perchlorate study goals and
protocols, and has funded and conducted many independent studies to assess the
potential risks and effects of perchlorate exposure. As a result of this close cooperation,
the science needed to accurately characterize the risk ftom pechlorateperchlorate
exposure was generated in an accelerated manner, and the resulting perchlorate
database is more robust than many in EPA's lntegrated Risk Information System (IRIS),
as evidenced by estimations of overall confidence, size of uncertainty factor, and types
of available data. .
While DoD scientists do not necessarily agree with all of the conclusions stated in
EPA's January 2002 perchlorate risk assessment document, the Department continues to
work with EPA and other stakeholders to develop scientifically-defensible decisions
regarding perchlorate use, assessment, and cleanup. Scientists and officials from both
organizations are actively discussing how to obtain a disinterested, objective and
neutral interpretation of this increasingly rich database from the Nation's leading
scientists. Once this review is completed, EPA can move forward to finish its risk
assessment and to provide clear answers to State and local government leaders;- and
water utility officialsL and address public concerns about perchlorate.
Commitment to Protecting the Public
The Department is charged with protecting the United States - its people, values,
and resources. DoD is the environmental steward of over 25 million acres of land
some 1.1 % of the total land area in the United States - lands that have been entrusted by
Congress to the Department to use efficiently and to properly care for properl\". In
executing these responsibilities we are committed to more than just compliance with the
applicable laws and regulations. We are committed to protecting, preserving, and,
when required, restoring, and enhancing the quality of the environment. Through the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP)L we are cleaning up contamination
from past practices on our installations and are building a whole new program to
address unexploded ordnance on our closed, transferring, and transferred ranges.
The fact that the Department has invested in excess of $25 million on perchlorate
research and treatment technology development alone is a clear indication of the
Department's commitment to protect the public health of the American people. This
commitment is further supported by our partnership with EPA to ensure that the
Nation's leading scientists are provided an opportunity to review the perchlorate
database. Such a review will ensure that risk characterization and subsequent risk
management decisions are, in fact, based on sound science.
Let me close by reiterating that the Department is committed to sustaining US.

test and training capabilities in a manner that fully satisfies that military readiness
mission, is protective of human health, and provides exemplary stewardship of the
lands and natural resources entrusted to DoD by Congress.
Sincerely,
Unknown
From: Cornell Jeff Lt Col, SAFIIE

Sent: Monday June 02 2003 15 3~
To: Cotter Sandra, Ms, OSD·ATL
Subject: FW Food safety / perchlorate I western growers assoclatJor. - Comments on DuBoIs Letter's RRPI
Charactenzatlons
fyi - \[s, Koetis comment

-----Original Message····
From: Koetz, Maureen, SES, SAF/lE
Sent: Monday, June 02,20033:26 PM
To: Groner, Laurence, (Iv, SAF/GCN; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col, SAF/lE
Cc: Miclat, Marriane, (Iv, SAF/PAM; Rusden, MIChael, Col, AFMOA/SGZE; VanHook, Deneice, Col, AFMOA'SGZP;
Ashworth, Richard, Col, SAF/lE; Daly, Patrick, Col, AF/lLEV; Sheuerman, Philip, Civ, SAF/GCN; Guy, Gina, SES,
SAF/GCN; 'Brian LTC ASA-l&E Rogers (E-mail)'; White, Carolyn, Civ, AFLSA/JACE; McHugh, Paul, Civ,
AFLSA/JACE; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGC; Sheuerman, Philip, Civ, SAF/GCN;
'David Bell (E-mail)'
Subject: RE: Food safety! perchlorate i western growers assoCIation -- Comments on DuBois Letter's RRPl
Characterizations
From: Groner, Laurenc-€, Civ, SAF/GCN
Sent: Monday, June 02,2003 10:13 AM
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col, SAF:lE; Koetz, f>1aureen, SES, SAFflE
Cc: Mlclat, Marrtane, Civ, SAF/PAM; Rusden, Michael, Col, AFMOA/SGZE; ,VanHook, Denelce, Col,
AFMOA/SGZP; Ashworth, Richard, Col, SAF:lE; Daly, Patrick, Col, AF/ILEV; Sheuerman, Philip, Civ,
SAF/GCN; Guy, Gina, SES, SAF/GCN; Bnan LTC ASA-l&E Rogers (E-mail); White, Carolyn, Civ,
AFLSA/JACE; McHugh, Paul, Civ, AFLSAjJACE; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD
OGC; Sheuerman, Philip, Civ, SAF/GCN; David Bell (E-mail)
Subject: RE: Food safety! perchlorate.' western growers association -- Comments On DuBois Letter's
RRPI Charactenzations
Th<1n~, Jeff. \'en' IIllerestin<' corresp0ndenct.'

Larr\'
l.duh:"nl.L· ~1 Gror;cr
A~~oc),]te G,'nl'tal Counsel
l)" MI",~nl or !ilL' Air I'or,','
,,-..u TI:1 ~ : .. 'mnw,.:;t,ai.'·; I.' ;-r:;"I":".:fw ~~ .::t, '''n:' , .. ' .., ~"l .f:.. .:: J:f. 'rr.~-J" a~'r:( ,·i)mnUUiJ ..\J:t\'J;. L'r ~'ti..·.~ rn"Jl['~~'" m.7!l"n..:: [)" 'l.~: .j:~ "f."11nl1.:l ...
;J';/}/I"U: Nit' rn.', arrr:"~I"; ~\,':h:: A: .. ft'r,,·,.: (1·'i .. ~ • /C:..'I:,·r~I' Ct··;lt~",! .....
From: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col, SAF/IE
Sent: Friday, May 30, 20032: 17 PM
To: Koetz, Maureen, SES, SAFiIE
Cc: Miclat, F-1arriane, C,V, SAF;PAtv1; Rusden, Michael, Col, AFMOA/SGZE; VanHdok, Deneice, Col,
AFF-l0A/SGZP; Ashworth, Rlcharo, Col, SAF,'.lE; Groner, Laurence, (iv, SAF/GCN; Daly, Patrick, Col,
AF/lLEV
Subject: Food safety / perchlorate· western growers association
\r.
jeff
-----Ongmal Message----
From: Cotter, Sandra, tv1S, OSD-ATL
Sent: Friday, May 3D, 2003 11: 12 AM
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt, Col, SAFflE; Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGe
Cc: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; Rogers, Damel, Col, AFLSNJACE; Dan Kowalczyk; 'Richard B. Belzer
PhD'
Subject: FW: draft 2 WGA response
Please review the ar.ached response to WGA. and proVide your coordmaliOn
Ivlessage Pag(' I of I
Unknown
From: Ferrebee. Patncla Ms OSD·ATL

Sent: Thursday. April 17 2003 1449
To: Cohen, Ben Mr. DoD OGC. Cornel:, Jeff Lt Col.. SAFflE Choudhury Shah Mr OSD-ATL.
Ross. Elaine. Ms. SAFfIEE: Rogers, DanIel, Lt Col, AFLSNPR
Cc: Kratz. Kurt, OSD-ATL. C:Jtfer, Sandra Ms. OSD-ATL
Subject: FW Hot Issue for Woodley
Importance: High
All
Attached IS the first draft of a response to the Barbara Boxer questions on perchlorate Mr Woodley wOl.ld like to
see a draft of these tomorrow morning Please send any comments or revisions by COB today and copy Sandy
Cotter and Kurt Kratz. If I missed anyone that should see these. please copy them
Thanks.
PatF
From: Richard B. Belzer PhD [mailto:rbbelzer@cox.net]
Sent: Thursday, April 17, 2003 9:20 AM
To: 'Ferrebee, Patricia, Ms, OSD-ATL:; 'Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAFflE'; 'Rogers, Daniel, Lt Col, AFLSA/PR'
Cc: 'Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL'; 'Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL'; Dan Kowalczyk
Subject: RE: Hot Issue for Woodley
Importance: High
j..
First serious draft of suggested responses to Sen. Boxer.
RBB
--·--Original Message----
From: Ferrebee, Patricia, Ms, OSD-ATL [mailto
Sent: Thursday, 17 April 03 08: 18AM
To: 'rbbelzer@cox.net'; Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAFflE; Rogers, Daniel, Lt Col, AFLSA/PR
Cc: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL
Subject: F\"J: Hot Issue for Woodley
Richard
I understand from the e-mail below that you are working on a reply to 3 questions from Boxer. The draft
reply IS due today Could you please forward the draft responses io me and copy Kurt Kratz and Sandy
Cotter
Thanks,
Pat F
-----OriginaJ Message----
From: Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL
Sent: Wednesday, April 16, 2003 9:27 Pt'-l
To: Ferrebee, PatriCIa, Ms, OSD-ATl
Subject: Hot Issue for Woodley
Draft for reply to Boxer's 3 questions due back tcday. Would you query Rick Belzer and work with him
to finish this off Other help Would come irom Sandy Cotter Ben Cohen. Jeff Cornell, .BAH. and Dan
Rogers Might want to turn It over to Sandy if she is not still crashmg on t,e Femstem letter
Kurt
Questions from Senator Barbara Bo:$'r for
John Paul Woodle~,
~ominee for Assistant Secretary for C 1\ i I Worl,,,s, Depanment of the Arrn~
1, In Peter Waldman's aniele in the II all S/ree/ Journal on January 10,2003, "Defense Flrnlt$
Help Inquiry Into Industry Water Pollution," he outlined the agreement reached between
Goodrich Corp" a Defense contractor. and California agencies to clean perchlorate' contaminated
sites in California's Inland EmpIre and to share relevant company infonnation \\'Ith panle's
involved III the groundwater contaminatIOn issue
al Did you contact any California officials, including elected State Senators or
Representatives, their staO- members, or members of the region's Perchlorate Task Force
about the subject maner of this anIcle"
Tilt' chraslIJI..' n! Ihi,' ,,"n-!'Llri (II llIL' ((I/CSIlIJl) cermi/s ol1h "re,' or "no' W1S11 C/".I
llL'{iC!lu'lJ1g U!I 11It' T(JCD TilL' Ul/C\IIIJII Ol'k.\ ahoul £.'011/([('/,1 .\.tl' Woodle! [!lulU/eo'. IlOI
L'o!1/(IC/\ 1111/1 \Ir II Olhil,'l lilLi' II('r" illilimcd hl' oThcr,I
b I If so, with whom did you w.lh and what was the nature of your conversation(s):
,-117"11'('1'\ c/£'n£'l1d 11/1 ,17" L11~\\ll"'lti lUI If 1(1i \\'0,' "no, .. Ihen Ih; docs nm OUCh'
/5('110'-" rJwl1' Sen HU.'I:L'" 111,1', h, ri\l7(fl'.; u/' !lm'(' s{Jed!;£.' ill!OrmO/Iollrho/ slI£' ho{?e,1
\ /,' II (iUd/t'l It 'ill 1101 1'('1 t d,
c) What is your view about the 3~reem<:nt detailed in the aniele?
"The a~r<:cmt.'nl ~t't'I(':li (J\,,'-!:'\ch Jnd al.!encies of the State ofCalil'ornia is a

rrl\:lIe Jnatll'r hl'!\\l'Cll lI1L'~l' r:lnJC.' I lin not ha\'t"am' \'ie\\~ ahnut their
a~rel'mL'nt
d) The mfonnation obt3ined from GoodrIch as a result of the legal agreement with state
officIals could have been obtamed h~ the st:lte from the Depanment of Defense (DoD),
Wh: won'{ the DoD cooperate In the st:lte' s investigation?
"I d(l no( ~n()\\ I\hal Ill!l1rm:lll\)l1 (ali(omia ofliciab m;J\ ha\e ohlained from
(,oollrieh Theret'"rc, \ J,' nl1\ f..n()\\ \\hether anI ~uch Il1lorn1ation could have (or
[lcrh3Q::; h3S I r>Cl'n l1ht;Jllh.'"j rr()n~ till' DCpal1ll1elll n! Ikkn~c 11(1\\'c\'er. the
prel111Sl' of \our qUl''''lll1ll h rrllhkm:l!ic, fl1r tlk' Dl:panmel1! IS CooDL:nlllng fulh'
\1 ith statL' ofJi<:l:.lh Oil nlJtll'l.' rl'I:l!eJ II) :l!kL!:tlll1lb thaI OpO relea~cd [lerchlorate
on or at the propertlc" 111 LlllL'~tl\)n ..
e I \\'hat role have you played m decldml; whether. and 10 what extent. the DoD
cooperates')
"The Dcpanmenl oj' IkfL'n~c I~ full\' coopcratJn!.! with statc officials. and I fullv
support th()Sc cfion", ,.
-, The Depanment of Defense (000) and ItS contractors were the largest users olperchll1rJt~'
in California Perchlorate IS an explosi\ e salt used In rocket fuel It has been linked tn thyroId
hormonal Imbalance. affecting metaholism and braIn de\elopmem. pamcularl) among infant
children, During your tenure as the Asslstanl Deput~ Linder Secretaf) of Defense (En\'lronment 1.
you suhmmed \\Tinen testimony to a California State Senate comminee mvestigaImg perchlorate
contaminatIon that stated "Until we ha\'e agreed upon the best available scientific information
we should not commit scarce resources 10 cleanup to levels beyond what is necessaf) 10 prCllcct
human health and the en\'lronment'"
;)) Please explain the specific le\ el to which you are referring and how you helieve it
should be determined?
"Thl' maxJnlllnl Ie,,!.:] of rerchlnratl' exposure that poses no appreciable risk Inhuman
ilL'a 1111 and I hl' en\'1 ronml'nt I> current! \ unkn(l\\'Il, Hence. there is no .speci lie Ie\ cl'
ll' \\ hiL:h I rl'!eITed in 1m te~tInl\,n\, B;lsed on the results of an extensive research
pr\l!.!ralT1 Ihat [)(\/) scientlst~ tl~l\ l' thcrnseh'cs pcrfonned accordinu to the hi!!hest
rrnti:ssionJI and ethlC<l! st~lnJJn.k the Dcpanmcnt belie\'t~s that exposures aho,,\:: the
draJt propn:-,ed Refer\::ncc !)(1Sl' meet the defInition of fuIh protectin!.! human health
:.md the em Ironment. The lk'p:,mml'nt belie\'t~s that the hil!hest level that fulh
rnltccts human health and tIll: l'll\ IWllml'nt should he asccnained usin!.! the best
:J\:tilabk. hiuh-qua!11\ ~cll'nll)i~ II1r'omlation tllat has been fulh re\'i\::\\ed h\
Independent ~L:il'ntish, hlf 1I1~1\ re~l~()n, the: Depanment full\' supports the
\L!nll1l1:'lratl"ill1', ini\l~ltl\l' I" r~'Il': ,;pl'cllic matters ofscientitic contn)\ers\' to <J
ll)mmittce <l( thl.' \::lllllnJ! \<.:~\Jl'm\ 01' Sciences'"
hi In deternlining this Jewl. dl) ~ou nl'lle\'e that it should be set to protect the most
\'ulnerable populations~hiljrcn. rregn~nt women. the elderly. and low-income and
mInority populatIons:
"Till' ma\.lInum k\l'j <It Tll'rl'hlm:lll' l'\rhl~Url' that rose~ 110 appreeiahk ris!'; to
\ ulncrahk suhropu!;.Iuon<., I' n<11 cum,:nt!\ known, AscenainilH!. these values is
lnhcrl.'lllh much mprl' Ct)mrk\. "u-:ntificalh than den\ inL: such a value for the
~l'nl'ral pOTlUlaiIPn. and 111,k'l',L It CJTln\ll hl' donL' \\'itllOut !irst ans\\erill~ thi, "casier"
,,":icntiliL: question, ] nu~, Unlllllll' ":':J'\" question is ans"ercd it i~ imppssihk to
<lns\\ l'r thl'se harder Olll':>
.. \ Sl'rlOU~ cnmpl1catio!1 \" thalthl' iJl.:l1lificatlOn ot'\uJl1crabk suhropulJtions is not

<lS simpic :JS it ma\ sound, It I> nol Ir<ln"parl'll\ (lr oh\'iolls which suhpopu!atHH1S arl'
111 I~ct morl' "\lIlnerahk" ()nl' 'l1hp(\r\li~li<)11 \Oll do nol menlion-thL' de\'(,~lopin\!
h:IW'-l" \\ Ilkh helie\ l'J 1<' hl' \ Uilll'r<lhk III tllHoiJ II1jUT"\, Whether it is in {Jct more
\ ulncrahk to perchlorate, and i! "I', at \\ hal Joses and undcr \\ hat cin:umslanCl's. is
JL:lUalh <l hi!.:hh compll'\ ~Cil'nl1l'lc prohlem,
"'[ he [)epanml'nt helte\'Cs thJt It is Imponant to clearl\' distinl.!uish the m\L'sm7£'nT of

ns~ from policy dcc'lslom e<lnl.:l'mlll\! what risk manugement actions to take, This
pnnclnk j" nOT nl'\\: iT 113' r~ . :n :.In iI1Tc~r:.I! p:.In or' ri~~ :.Ina" 'I, rractlcl' 1,'- ='" ';.'.~"
[<ISh :1<;,l:'SSnlcnt" should t! ..: "rIC..:tl''''', rl:'Jil"Tl": Jnd ~cll:'ntificJII' hal~1I1l.'L'~ ,,' :::,::
~\\'l.'rnml:'nl oniCl~I!" t'ulh ap]'lr"''':I~ltl' ttlL' l'III1:-L'qut.'nl'L" ()t'thl.' n:--k mana!.2l.':11l'r.'
choirl." the." make ..
c) You refer to the lack of agreement on the scientific evidence on perchloratc Arc ~ au
aware of the scientific studies showing that perchlorate has ad\'erse affects on human
health down to levels of I pan per billIOn"
''In ,Lmual\ 200:. FP,,\ pllhll:-IH:d an ~X1('rn,,1 1'('\'1('\1 draf' documen: entltkll.
"Pl:'rchloratt.' Em lwnnll.'ntJl ( llntaminati()n: Toxicolol..!ical Re\ ie\' and R\<;~
Characterizatinn" ([hI.' "2()(J:2 Drat! Asst.'ssmL'nt" l. The document waspuhllsht.'d
hec~.IUsL' F PA ':-; pL'cr rl"'ic\l po Ilc' re(] ui res that external peer re\'ic\\'s [-IC conti uct",d in
puhlic "'ith opnortun!l' 1(1" rub/lc partiCirallon and comment, Tht.' document dol':- noT
stall:' that pachlnrate ha, ad\l~r"'l' ert'ecb on human health at an exposure k' 1.'11)1' I
I,
prh, RJthcr. thIS \alue tn .., JnnkJllL: \\'atcr egui,'alent level deri\ cd 1'rom the
Rl't'L'rL'nCC Dos", that 1-:1'.\ Crtlf1lJ1ed in that c,tcmal rc\ic\\ draft prior to pCL'r rl'\'ie\\ ,
'\t till:' hot Will 1)( L'ach pa!.2-:. l'P -\ ad\ ls~d all redders: "Draft--Do :\pt OUl)tt: or Citt:."
It 1" unl'llflunatL' that somt: rl'adL'r" ha\ e i~nored this caveat and chosen lP qU()lt: and
Clll' st:kctt:d in(onnatitlll I;(lll~ thl" draft document 3n\\\'a\' Tht.' Department is
l'nllCt:rned til;)! thi" rr:.Ictlcl' lTD'. unJ . . mlinc FP,.\·s peer rC\'ic\\ pro~rJm,"
d J Arc' ~ ou aware that o\'er tht: bst dc'cadL'. EPA has undertaken four re\'iews of the
sCIence regardIng perchlorate') '\rl' ~ I)U av,are that in the review published in 200:.
baseJ on the scienti fie e\'ldcnc:.:, EI>:\ recommended a reference dose of 1 part per
hilllOn'
"II: It' :?()():2 e\.h:mJI rl" ll'\\ ll:·.l!\ h,,',dtli :.J~sessnwnL EPA proposed a Ret'erellcL' DosL'
()j t)\I()I)()~ JnL: h~-J:I\, 11"- : r:.J!l rl'; bilillm, This dratl health aSSeSSlllenl "'as thell
re, Il'\\L'<.1 t'n an cx!(:rnai r.ml': rur:-.ual1t tt' FP;\'s reer re\'icw plllic' :.Ind proccdure",
That Danl'! i~<,ueu ih re(\nn Iii .IUllt,' :;(l()~. and as thl:' summa" of that n:ptlrl indicate~.
"pl'l'r rL'\'ie"L'r:- pn:senteJ tilL'I: 0\\'11 0pllllnl1:-- on technical topics: no ('ffons \',:ere
mad ..' t(\ rC:.Ich conscnsu' lIn :Hl' 1""Ul'" lhus. \,hik It is miL' that 1,,1>:\ proposed a
I\L'krL'I1C~' J)ost: that e'luatL" t( \ ~\ll l'r:l! n(\osure in drinkin~ walcr or I ppb. 1T 1:-- nm
th:.: case thaT the L'xH:rnal pL':.:r fl" Il'\\ p:llll'j L'ndtlrseJ ()f supported this pwpnsal,
"'\ numhL'r (11' sciemifil llUl"tllll1 ... !la' .., hel'n raised C(lnCL'mll1~ thL' :200:; c"tl'rnal
rl" Ie" dr:.Iti health aSSL':--sl1ll:'nt. YUl':--tltln, tilat til-: suhsequent I.'\tcrnal peel' re\ le\\ dlJ
nOl rL's()h'~, Then:rore, thl' ,\t.lll1ltllstr:J11l11l h:.I:- asl-eJ the '\ation~tl :\c:.luel1l' PI'
I..,cIl:nc\.'~ to re\il'\\ thesl' lIndl'rl' Jn~ "eIL'nCl' qUL'stitln" ttl pr<)\'idt: ~reall'r illLlmln~Hion
C(11l-:erntnL: "'hat eX\11lSurL" 1:\ ~'i ... ~lr ...' likL'h \(l proteC1 human heahh anu till'
I.'ll\ 1runmelll,"
e) Do ~ au agree that perclilorJtl:' has ad\'crse health effects at low levels?
"\\'ht:ther perchlorate ha' :JU\ erse effects at 10" I\:\'cls depends on the dt:1inllion or
,md \\hat 1l'\cl..; Jr~' und~'rstllnci tP rl' "in" .. Ther~' l~ ciL'arh an :\r(hl:r,
··:.J(hl'r~~'··
j.:\ L'] that (ll'mol1slrat'li\ ,Hi\L'r~C, hLl~ that k\ci is hcn~r ticscrirx:J a, llUll.
1:-.
"tlI~h"-t~'n~ t(1 hundn:d:-. 0; th(1u:-.anJ:-. ll! !lnll':-. hl!oChL'r than en\irOnmellld
~':":PtlSurl':> d:\'en in thi:-. casc. thl' erket, 1Il qUl'SlilJn arc therapeutic rather thJr~
adH:rSL' Inr rl'rson~ \\h(1 ar..: h\patll\TOlu., \\'hlCh specitic efkcb arl' hl'st
chamctcrized as ad\crsl' (as opposed to adapri\e or e\'L'n inconsequcntlal), and 1I11Jn
\\ hat conditions 10 which !oCrpup:, of rL'(lple. is one of the scientlfic I..jUCS!l(111' tl1:.1t th\.'
:\oministration ha:-. IncludeJ In It:-. Charue tll thl' .'\atlonal Acadl'n1\ .'
fl Wh~ In your statement to the California State Senate do you imply that the e\'idence
does not indicate that there IS a sIgnificant health effect from exposure to perchlorate0
"":..:posurcs in (aliform:l t(1 pl'rchlorate at levels aho\'e xx pph due l() [)e(l'ns~'
Ikpartmcnt ;;H.:ti\ ities h'l\l' hl'l'n clImInated. Therefore. the remainin!.!. scit:l1titic
ljlll':>tll\n I ' ,\ hether C:":PO>UI\.':-' t'leln\\ x\ pph mi!.!ht pose a risk to human Iwalth. anJ
11 ';(1. under \'hat condition, Irnmcalh. much of the discllssion of the perchloratl'
Issue h:l<; proceeded until'r th..: Inlpllcit hut enoneous assumption that actual
e\ rl'sure:, rem:.J1I1 hi!.!h It I' al"ll un!onunate that our si!.!niflcant df(1n~ t~, l'limmatl'
Instmces l)f hl!.!h e.\pOSUrl' P\ l'~ the D:.Jst se\'t;~raJ \'t~ars continue to he icnored.
,,' hl-'rc is srecific hasl" (l'r (lur current hdicfthat exposures hcJow xx pph do not
J
-::IW,,", J sl~nifi<.:ant health et't't:-:l I he human ~linical tri.al pc-rformcd hy the late
l nl\ l'rslt' Pt' Orecon cnd()LrJlh,J,\!..:I:-.1 \!llnte Greer and his colleal!ues SllO\\S that the
tfm:"hldJ 10r !()Jick unt:d,,' ll1hd"ltlll!; 1" ISO pph or £!reuter. We beliew that iodide
UJ1l,d'L' II1hihitlon j<; no! :.Jr~ :.J,h ,,'r:-,,' dt'cc1. und that it is in fact a mundanc. nonnal
~)_,! lllih rc\er:-.ihk hH,(ilerJ11..:.t1 nhL'nl l l11cnon. For JJl ad\'crse effl'ct to occur iodide
llT1lahe Il1U,! h... :'lIhst:U1lial/' 1:1i11t'llleJ Il)r:m sustained period: thi~. in tum. must lead
II :1 l:IE~l' and uncotnnen . . :llcj rl'nUl'h:llIPn in tlnToid honnon~' 1('\'e1s: and these
I
~ll<;[:tll1l'd, uncomncns~tl'J chan~l" in thnoid hormonc k\'cls must then impaci thl.:
Lll" l,jor1nL: ft:tlls. It' pcn:hl,'r;lll' C:\rll:-.lIn: i~ kept helow the threshold for iuJidc
UTlU!..l' II1hihitlon, thcll nil ad' l:r~~' l'rt~<':l:-' alon~ thi~ (','em path are e\'en ti:Jsible
hlTa~lse not e\ l'n adaptl\ l' llr trJ\ lulet'lccts can occur. All current drinkinl.! \\ater
l''\J1()~ure.; ;;tr~' well helo" thl' thrl'shll!d, and that 11 what ~i\'es the Dep:ml11cl1t
cl'nflcknL'C thut [nne '" nt' "i!oCI1II'ICIJ1! Ilt.'ulth cffl'ct from C\POSlIrt.' to perchlpri.lte:·
g) Do ~ ou agree that in protectln~ tht: health of the American people. the government
should err on the side of safet~ .3..'> OPPOSI:J to cost'.'
"[I is premi.lture to adJrl:~'; the ulIc,tllll1 pt'prcclsl.'h· whm risk m:.1ni.ll!crnCI1l dC:l.:ision"
ur~' h.. st. and in \'hat ClrCUI11"'IJn-:l', In ~eneral. Jl " prclcrahk that in protl.'ctin!.! the
health Ill' tn,,' o\mcrici.ln peppil' It I' n~'~t tt) reJucl' thl' amount n\ which \\1..' err h\
1!l'ttin~ the SCICIH.:e ril.!l1t ht.'lnn: \\l' cOlbider a rJJll.!e o(risk mana\letnl.:nt altcrnati\'t.'s.
"Th\.' Dl.'Qarttnl'nl IS concL'ml.'d that Jt.'cisions to cn on the sidL' of sal~l\ m:l\ also CIT
on thl' siJe of compromisin~ the Ilatlonal securtt\ of thL' ljnited States ThIS is a
tradcoffthat \\L' would allli!..l' to L1\oid, Ensurin~ that we get the sciencc right
ITIlniml7l'<; thl' ch:.Il1cl' lhal 1\:..' \\ i Ii hal e to !:lee ..;ueh tradl'(1!f, ..
h I The 000 has told local officials from the Inland Empire that the militar: \1 J" not
responsible for perchlorate contammation. Is It your \iew that the 000 and ItS
contractors are not responsible for the contamination"
"The SeeretJf\ or the Am\ ha~ Illl"nnned \ \YI thnt it nertormeJ :.In ntclbl\ e
rec()rd~ seJrch Jnd di'L'n\ ereJ nl' e\'ldence that it<; actl\itle~ at thl' 1\1mle!' Rdtl 1
:\rm\ A.mmunition I'lJnl rl'ka-;l'd anI perchlorate durin!.! till' 1Q.;h-\ pcrJ(ll,.i In "hlcl~
it ()per~teJ the sit. .-"\-; \OU 1-11\1\\. thIS plant \\'as used for the transshlrment l)!
mlll1itinn~ tp the Pacific ThcatcT durin!.! \\'orld War 11 and was not en!.!<l!.!cd in th:..'
manufacture or perchlorate or 11:' munitions."
i) I f the 000 and its contractors an: responsible for contamination. do you belIe\'e the
DoD and its contractors should pay for the clean-up':'
··Whether. and if Sl). tn \\ hal e\.ten:. the Department or Defense is Iwbll: felr ckanur
COSb i~ J maller 01 senkJ la\1 Thl' f)ep:mmc:nt \\ ill fulfill its lel!al responsibilitks
a> those responsihiJitle, Jrc ~IJILIJICa!l'J tn accordance with applicahle law. It \-\ould
he 111:lpprnpriatc lor the Ikr:.mI11t:nt tl' mahc specific commitments. \\'hether in
!'!l'nt:ra! nr in re!.!ard to 'rt:L'lli, 'I!l'>, \\ 11Ich either Jdd to or take aW<.l\ (rom what th~
I~l\\ rTl1\ ldt:~.·'
_. In your response to Senator .kffl)rd~" ~u~stlon regarding perchlorate. you answered: "In
111: c~r,h:it: a::, ASSIstant Deput: l'nJt:f ~t:cretary of Defense (Environment). I have been
In\(11\ed In working with represent:J.\l\t:~ oflht: military services and state and federal
regulator: agencies to enhance our unJerst:mdrng of the nature and toxicity of perchlorate
and thc extent of perchlorate cont:J.mmatlOn on military facilities. As a matter of pollution
rrt:\ ~nllon. I also ha\'e encouraged dc\ elopment of cleanup technologies and research into
rOlt.'ntl~1 altem:ltl\'e substances to rerchlorate In military munitions:'
a I Please be more specific \\"l1h regard to : our work to "enhance our understanding of
the nature Jnd toxiclly of perchlorate :md the extent of perchlorate contamination on
military facilities."
"Thl.: Ikpartmcnt of f)cfl'n~l' h,l" '11:..'nt ()\ er s:~ millil'n to dt:velor thl' s<':lentitic
I-.no\\!edl.!(, that would 1'\:\1.::11 till' l'\.t1'11t tll "'hlch Ip\\-k\t:1 exposure tel pcrchlorml'
pI)se:-- an\' risl-. to human hl'~ltl1 ~.II1d th:..' t:11\'lrPIlI11t:nt rhis amount \ a~t" c."Cl'l'ds
wh:Jt ali otht:r federal a~t:nCIl'-. cnmhlned h:1\(' dl'\,oteJ tl) anS\\l'rJn~ the..;:..' ,clcntilic
9 uc"tl(ln~
., rht: Deranment has abo spent P\ ef S.'\ mi II ion dollar:-- !<lr research and
de\ elOf1ment int(1 pt:rchle 1rJtl' lreatment tl'chnoh)~ies Thi~ amount \Jsth cxcct:ds
\\hat 3.11 other federal a!..!enclt:'\ cOl11h1l1ed ha\l' devoted tn answcrin!.!. these: tt.'chnical
and enl.!Jnl'erin!.!. question, ..
hi Pleas~ be mor~ specific "jth regard to your encouragement of clean-up technllio~\
development and research into potentIal altemati\'e substances to perchlorate In milltar:
munitions,
"The Department has de\ oh:J addiucmal fund:' for R&D inw Pl)ssihk suhs\1lLlte~,
CUITenth ::l\aiJahle suhstitutes pose much !,!I"t~ater riSk to our s()ldll'r~, S:Jilor~ :Jnd
a.lm1el1 Indeed, perchlorJtl' ma\ ht' the least risk\ enereetic compounJ \.:r1l)" 11
"Research tnW alternati\ es ml~ht heJr fruit sometime in the futun.:. hut al! slH1ulJ
keep 111 mind thaI ~nerL!eli,,' (()mpounds C:JIT\ inherent dan!!ers h\ \'inue of the
chemical reJctions h\ \\'hl(h thl'\ "ur\.:, In addition, an\ alternalI\'C t}lal look:;
promisinf.! from an operJl1onal :,tandroint will ha\'c to he thorou!.!hl\ and
comprehen:'i\l'h studied T<1 :l,,(enain wheTher iT poses a risk to human health and the
ell\ Ironmenl \\ e real lie that there is L!reaT interest in \'arious quaners in possihle
altl'malI\ e:" HO\\'l'\ eL thl' Ikpal1melll j:, not" illing to suhstitute an altemati\ t'
compound for which rish 1<' human healTh and the ~O\'jronment are either unkn0wn
00 are known tll pose L!re:lll'r ""k" tl1:111 perchlorate,
c I \\'hat were the outcomes of ~our effons:
"Thl'~:: effolb are nllL!lltnL!, a" til ... re:--earcl1 and de\ elopment proces:-- is a painstakim!.
~
d I H0\\ was your underst;mdll1t: (\1' the nature and toxicity of perchlorate enhanced?
"111,,' I kranment ha~ :--h:lrell ll1l' re..,ulh (\:' It~ research widel\. first \\ ith th,'
In .. lrpnm-:nt<.ll Prntl'c!Jl)r, \c:en~'\, :mJ th;"n "'ith th,' entire membership of the
Inll'rL!(1\ l'mmcnwl Perchlprat,' "'tl'l'nl1~ ('pmmItlC'l'. on which sit sc\'(~ral
n.:pn:~entat:\\l\'e~ oJ stat..: rl'~111:1ton <.lL!-:I1Cle~, Finalh. DoD scil'misb ha\ <.:
panlelp~Jlt:'d in nUl11ertlu~ ((lnll'rl'nCl'~ :.lI1-i ,,\ mrosia on maltt:rs rt:lated to perchlorate,
"Iklpr,,' hl'!.!innJn~ In\ :'C'I'\ 1,,',,' ~l~ DeQun l I1der Secret~!\ of Defensc (1-:I1\'lron111(:l1t ).
I hnl'" \en IIllIe:lt all ahplJlthl' n:lllIrc and tP"lei" ofp-:rchlor~te, I am not h\
trJIl1lllC a S(lemlst In\sd: l.earnmc: Ll:- mud) a:-- I ppssihh can ha.~ he<.:n a \ ita] mlrl or
m\ r-:sponsihilltil'::' j hJ\ l' re:l,,',J Ill'a\ li\ (\n the OLJtst~l1dil1!! l'''\p<.:nisl' ofproJ\:ssional
"Cll'ntISt:; \\ ithin and JSS()(I:ltd "ith Til: I kpanmem \ 1:.In\ (\f thesl' scientists hJ\'l'
actualh preformed the pnman rc,,-::m:h (\n ",hid) the re!.!ulmon itl.!l'IH.:ie:-- rch t(\
de\'elop their OWI1 understJnJrn" III til;,' ILlture and t(\'.leit\ ofpercl1l\.lrate, I ha\'e heell
pn\ ilceed to h:1\ e more <..lJrl'cT ;,lL'Cl'~~ III till' \i<.:\\~ ()f these :--cientislS and therefore
hl'cl1 ahle tt' dlscem \\ h\ ~C1l'I1Iht" d1"':!L!re..: tln SOl11l' lair" Imronant iS~Ul':-- relJt~d tl1
perchloratl.: ..
e I What did the Department of Dclt.:nse dt.:terrnme with regard to the extent of
perchlorate contamination on military facilities')
From: Kratz. Kurt.. OSD-ATL
Sent: Thursaay. November 13. 2003 12:28
To: Belzer@RegUlatoryChecl<.boOk..org
Cc: 'Kowalczyl< Dame!': Cotter. Sandra. Ms. OSD-ATL
Subject: HOTI - ACTION draft EPA perchlorate response
Importance: High
EPA RFC 11702

draft response 1...
Hot suspense. Comments on reply?
Kurt
::'::-om:
November 13, 2003 12:01 PM
SubJect: ACTION Ora
Importance: High
Note to Interagency Workgroup on Perchlorate:
FYI, attached below is an Information Quality Guidelines Request on

perchlorate advisory levels and EPA's f~nal draft response. please send
any comments on the draft response to me by 5:00 pm Friday, November 14.
Thank you.
(See attached file: EPA RFC 11702 draft response 11.7.wpdl
:ncorn~ng request:
ht~p://www.epa.gov/oei/qualityguidelines/afreqcorrectionsub/11702.pdf
:"::.sa Mat::hews
~xecut~ve Ass~stant to :he Science Adv~sor
:.1.S. Env~ronrnen~al Protection Agency
EPA draft as of 11/7/03
[On EPA OElletterhead]
November 7. 2003
Dr. George Seaver

19 Mystery Lane
Cataumet, MA 02534
RE: Response to Request for Correction (RFC) pursuant to United States (U.S.)
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Infonnation Quality Guidelines (RFC #11702)
Dear Dr. Seaver.
This letter is in response to your request for correction dated July 5, 2003 raising concerns
about what you describe as differing "advisory levels" regarding perchlorate at EPA headquaners
and at the EPA Regional level (specifically, Region 1). Following a thorough review. we believe
your request is incomplete according to the Guidelines for Ensuring and Maximizing the Quality.
Objectivity, Utility and Integrity of Infonnation Disseminated by the Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA Information Quality Guidelines). In your request, you state that "THE FEDERAL
AND THE REGION 1 EPA HAVE DIFFERENT ADVISORY LEVELS FOR PERCHLORATE
(4 TO 18 ~S 1 PPB)." I would like to take this opportunity to reiterate EPA's assessment
guidance on perchlorate and provide you with further guidance should you wish to submit a
future request for correction.
EPA does not have disparate guidance for perchlorate as you suggest. EPA issued a
memorandum at the beginning of this year to update infonnation concerning the status of the
Interim Assessment Guidance for Perchlorate originally transmitted on June 18. 1999 (Noonan,
1999; Horinko. Jan. 2003 and cHuifying memo Mar. 2003). EPA developed the 2003
memorandum because EPA regional offices and states have sought advice as the number of sites
identified as potentially contaminated with perchlorate has increased. This document provides
guidance to EPA staff involved in environmental cleanups. It also provides infonnation to the
public and the regulated community on how the Agency intends to assess possible perchlorate
contamination. It reaffinns the recommendations in the 1999 Interim Guidance regarding
perchlorate-related assessment activities. The 1999 Interim Guidance recommended that Agency
risk assessors and risk managers continue to use the standing provisional reference dose ("RID")
'range of 0.0001 to 0.0005 mg/kg-day for perchlorate-related assessment activities. The ] 000
guidance stated. "If environmental authorities decided to pursue site-specific clean-up or other
water management decisions based on this RID range by applying the standard default bod:
weight (70 kg) and water consumption level (2 uday). the resultmg provisional clean-up levels
or action levels would range from 4-18 pans per billion (" pp b")". This guidance is not a
regulation and does not substitute for CERCLA. RCRA. or other EPA regulation. More
mformation on the status of the guidance and a set of frequently asked questIOns can be found at
the Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse web site
http:'IW\.\'w.epa.2:ovlswerffmdocuments'perchlorate merno.htm and
hnp: '\\,rww.epa.go v swerffrr'documents 'perchlorate qa.htrn.
-
The EPA Irifonnation Quality Guidelines apply to infonnation the Agency disseminates
to the public that is prepared by the Agency to support or represent an EPA viewpOInt or to
formulate or suppon a regulation. guidance or other Agency decision or position. in thiS
particular case. the IQGs apply to the mformatlon that EPA relied upon to fonnulate EPA
guidance on perchlorate. EPA cannot detemune whether or not the EPA or OMB information
Quality GUidelines have been satisfied because your request does not reference any infonnatlon
subject to the IQGs. Should you wish to file a future request on this topic. in additIon to other
items. EPA requests that you include specific reference to infonnation that EPA relied upon to
develop the perchlorate guidance and how you may believe such infonnation does not comply to
the EPA or OMB lQGs. Please refer to Section 5.3 of the IQGs for further descriptIon of when
the IQGs apply. You can download the IQGs at: http:'ww\.\·.epa.gov'oei/quaJitvguidelines.
Thank you for your interest In thiS Issue Should you wish to submit a new Request for
Correction under the lnfonnation QualIty GUIdelInes. please provide the following:
a descnption of the mfonnatlon you believe does not comply with the Office of
Management and Budget or EPA IQGs. including specific citations to the
infonnauon and to the guidelines. if applicable
an explanation of how the mfonnatlon does not comply with the IQGs
a recommendation for corrective action
an explanation of how the alleged error affects or how a correction would benefit
you
Sincerely.
Mark Lunner. Director

Office of lnfonnation Collection
Unknown
From: Cotter. Sandra. Ms. OSD-ATL

Sent: Fnday May 23. 2003 11 03
To: Choudhury Shan. Mr OSD-ATL Rogers Daniel COl AFLSAIJACE
Cc: Cornell, Jeff Lt Col SAFflE Kratz Kun OSD-ATL Ferrebee PatnCla Ms OSD-ATL Led Detter
George COL. 000 OGC Dan Kowalczyk 'Richard B Belzer PhO'
Subject: RE Dmgell-Solls Letter--DoD Percnlorate Samplmg
Does anyone have a copy of tne enclosures mentioned In our draft response lattached)?
-----Ongmal Message----
Fro'!': Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL
sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 2: 12 PM
To: Rogers, Daniel, Col, AFLSA!JACE
Cc: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAFIIE; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; Ferrebee, Patricia, Ms, OSO-ATL; Cotter,
Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGC
Subject: Dlngell-Solls Letter--DoD Perchlorate Sampling
Importance: Hlgn
20 May 03
Dan-please draft a response for tne attacnec letter from RepresentatIves Dmgell and SoliS by COB 21
May 03 I will be tne Cleanup Office action officer Please cc Kurt Kratz. Pat Ferrebee and Sandy
Cotler on the draft response
This IS tne letter mentIOned m 19 May 2003 Wa'i Street Journal article that rylr Woodley discussed
yesterday With you and I Tne planned response for tne attached should parallel the diScussion m the
:ransmiltal of the Intenm draft occurrence aata to EPA as directed by Mr Woodley's yesterday
TnanKS St-,ah
~.
-----tnglnal Message----
From: Ferrebee, PatriCia, Ms. OSD-ATL
sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 10:18 AM
To: Hagan, Sarah, Mrs, OSD-ATL
Cc: Krat2, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; Choudhury, Shah. Mr. OSD-ATL; Cotter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL
Subject: FW: Is the attached a Cleanup Action
Importance: High
Saran
Yes tnlS IS our actIon
PatF
-----Onglnal Message----
From: Hagan, Sarah, Mrs, OSD-ATL
sent: Tuesday, May 20, 2003 8:56 AM
To: Ferrebee, Patncla, Ms, OSD-ATL
Subject: Is the attached a Cleanup ActIon
Importance: High
Need to turn this back tOday If It Isn't ours Let me know Thanks
Saran
The Honorable John D. Dlngell
Rankin; \lemoe'F
Committee on Energy and Commerce
L:S, House of Representatl\c:
Washington. DC 205 J5-6 J J:;
Dear Representative Dingell:
Thank ~'ou for your Ma~ 16. 2003. letter to Secretary Rumsfeld regarding the
Department's perchlorate sur\'e~ In Januar; 1998. representatives from the Department
of Defense (DoD). l"S EnvIronmental Protection Agency (EPA) and other interested state
regulator; officials and stakeholders .I0lned together to form the Inter-Agency Perchlorate
Steering CClmmlttee (IPSC l. The chJrter of the IPSC is to facilitate and coordinate
-
accurate accounts of related technolo!!lca! issues (occurrence. health effects. treatabilit\,.
and waste stream handling. analytical detection. and ecological impacts) and to create
informatIon transfer links for Interah'enc~ and Intergovernmental activities regarding
these area~ of concern.
Shortl~ afterformmg this mno\ 3tl\ e !urtnershlp. EPA mfom1ally requested DoD
to pro\'lde informatIOn related to the use. stor:.tge and treatment of perchlorate associated
rocket and mIssile systems throu~houl the l 'mted States, 000 completed an initial data
call lrom the sen'ice components anJ pnl\lded that infom1ation to EPA (Enclosure J I In
\1a~ of2000. a \\orkmg group In the Department of Defense undertook a more
comprehensl\'t: request for mformallon from our active Installations. The vo]untar;'
sur\'e~ request mcluded a number of questIons mcluding those listed in your leiter. Our
Intent was to determine whether mSl311atlons haJ sampled for or been requested by the
regulator; community to sample for perchlorate Additionally, we were seeking
infom13tion ahoUl propellant disposal areas. t'pen-hum-open detonation areas. ordinance
or solId rocket tesung and or maintenance (:lcilltl~S, We alst) asked for information
regarding items containing perchlor:lt~ swred used housed at the mstallatlon,
At the end of May 200::, the ..\Ir Force asked ARA.. the contractor (or
consolidating the survey inputs. 10 tinallz-: th~ contract e\'en though responses from DoD
facilities were Incomplete. Per your r-:quesl. the incomplete data IS attached (Enclosur~
21. The maps you requested are alsl) attached tEnclosun: :; I. The Depanment is
concurrentl:- pro\'1dlrtg thiS data to EPA. Indcp~ndent from the comract~d sur\'ey. the
Department has been tracking additlon:ll Information on DoD related p~rchlorate
acti\'ltles (Enclosure 4)
Over the past three years. DoD has been proactive in providmg leadership to the
Inter-Agency Perchlorate Steering Committee by providing resources to expand the
natlon's understanding of analytical capabilIties to detect perchlorate. research It:-
potentIal health effects. develop IODll\ atne technologIes for future treatment and
remediation. and evaluate possible e..:o-system Impacts 10 areas where perchlorate hJ:
been released mto the environment All of these effons haw been possible through the
cooperatJ\'e relationship and personal dedIcatIon of the entire membershir of the' J PSC
A similar lener is being sent to Representatlw Solis,
Smcerely.
Enclosures
As State'd
cc:
Honorable W. J. "Billy" Tauzin.
Chair. Comminee on Energy and Commerce
Honorable Paul E, Gillmor

ChaIr. Subcomminee on Environment and Hazardous Materials
COOR.DI~A TIO~ RECORD
SL'BJECT: Response 1'0 RepresentJtJ\es Dmgell and Salls on DoD'Perchlorat:? Sur.e;
AcqUisition Resources & AnalysIs
OSD Legislative Affairs
ODGC (£&11
~a\'\
Air Foret:
From: Kratz. Kurt, . OSD-ATL
Sent: Monday, April 14, 200316:13
To: Cornell, Jeff. Lt. Col., SAFflE
Cc: Choudhury, Shah. Mr, OSD-ATL: Cotter, Sandra. Ms. OSD-ATL
Subject: FW: NAS QuestionsfObservations
Jeff,
Mr. DuBois has asked for'the latest update of the NAS charge and venue
issue. Can you give me an update?
Thx,
Kurt
From: Rogers, Daniel,....Lt Col, AFLSA/PR
Sent: Sunday, April 13, 2003 1:52 PM
To: 'Richard B. Belzer PhD '; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATLi Cornell, Jeff, Lt.
Col., SAF/IE; 'Dan Kowalczyk '; Rogers, Daniel, Lt Col, AFLSA/PR
Cc: 'Jonathan Glledhill '
Subject: NAS Questions/Observations
Rick, Dan and Jonathan,
Here are some observations made by an expert friend on the NAS review:
Questions for the NAS----

In the summary paragraph.
will the committee evaluate the extensive reports on the toxicity and
medical use of perchlorate in humans?
The human data base for perchlorate is extensive. It includes clinical
evaluations, occupational studies, and epidemiological investigations.
Perchlorate has been used as a medicine for different conditions and has
been given to children to test for thyroid function. Moreover, other
credible organizations have used human 1ata as a basis of their
perchlorate RfD. Important expertise on the panel would be epidemiology
and clinical medicine, with an emphasis on thyroid problems.
In the technical background text; paragraph beginning with "Toxicity
testing ... n
IS the NAS panel also going to view the critical background studies to
EPA'S draft toxicology review and risk characterization?
As the NAS states, the principal target organ is the thyroid gland as
demonstrated with extensive experimental animal testing. However, in
the studies that NAS cites, perchlorate is not a "regular" developmental
toxicant in 2 species, nor a reproductive toxicant. Nor has its
\ (·0
immunotoxicity been demonstrated in two studies that specifically look
for this (Joan, please check this statement .on immunotoxicity. Thanks.
Mike). Its developmental neurotoxicity is suspected, and rightly so,
since thyroid toxicants can cause severe brain damage. However, this
effect is has not been unequivocally demonstrated in experimental animal
studies due to methodological issues. Many additional data and
interpretations of existing studies were given in public comments that
would aid the panel's evaluation. Important expertise on the panel
would be evaluation of experimental animal tOXicity studies.
In the text on plan of action.
Is the NAS panel going to review the extensive human information and
state its opinion as to whether the rat is the correct animal for EPA's
model?
EPA developed a model which principally used experimental animal results

to indicate likely effects in humans. The animal model used. the rat,
is known to have a very different response than humans to thyroid
disrupting chemicals. Other scientists feel that the extensive human
data should be used as the basis of the RfD instead. Important
expertise on the panel would include scientists that have experiences is
both human and rat thyroid work. (Note to Dan: Kurt Klaassen might be
good here. He chaired EPA's first panel review.)
Will the NAS panel review the protocols for the brain morphometry
studies and give an opinion on the reliability of the resulting data?
Changes in brain morphometry in rats are controversial due to incorrect

protocols used in the principal study monitoring these effects. In
order to understand the controversy, the NAS panel will need expertise
in this brain morphometry.
Will the NAB panel review the findings of scientists of different

expertise and affiliations that are found in the public comments to
EPA's 2002 draft toxicology review and risk characterization text?
Public comments to EPA's draft RfD are extensive and support, or take
issue with, many of EPA's key decisions. The NAS panel will need
experts in RfD determination in order to evaluate and integrate this
mass of information for the critical effect and appropriate use of
uncertainty factors. .
Will the NAB panel attempt to relate iodine uptake inhibition and
hormone changes in humans?
Inhibition of iodine uptake is recognized in EPA's text and by

scientists elsewhere as a precursor to the critical effect of hormone
change in pregnancy. These two effects, however, have not been
correlated to date. Moreover, depending on a precursor to a critical
effect as a basis of an RfD is not cons~stent with current EPA methods
for determining RfDs. Again, the NAS panel will need experts in RfD
determination in order to evaluate this issue.
In addition to specifying future research. will the NAS panel review the
ongoing research efforts of scientists that are specifically
investigating areas of uncertainty in the perchlorate RfD?
Epidemiological investigations of pregnant women in naturally occurring

perchlorate-exposed populations, and long term clinical perChlorate
administration are ongoing. Interim results will be available during
the time of the NAB reVlew. Other publications are likely to appear on
various aspects of perchlorate, toxicity during the time of the NAS
revlew as well, including the development of an RfD for perchlorate by
an independent, non-profit organization.
2
Message
Unknown
--_._-- --~--- ----- ,,- _.'_.
From: Cotler Sancra Ms OSD·ATL

Sent: TueSda, Mav 13 20:3 1: 2S
To: Racers Daniel Co:' AFLSA;JAC~
Cc: Belzer IE-malli
SUbject: RE 000 revISlonOIRAejl~'"
Tna'1t<s Dan
-----Or/glnal Message····
From: Rogers, Daniel, Col, AFLSA, JAC:
Sent: Tuesday, May 13, 2003 9:41 AI'~
To: Cotter, Sandra, f\15, OSD-A"T~
Cc: Belzer (c-ma:!)
Subject: RE: DoD revlslonO!RAedl:ll:
I offer the following
Tne Initlai 8 studies done In 1998'99 bv DoD/EPA and the Industry group focused on the full
range o· possible healtn effe::s. As a result of comments by the 1999 EPA Peer review, follow
0,1 work done Ir 2000/2001 bv tile same group focused more closely on determining the extent
to wheh the fetus IS eSDeciall'" vu'neraDie. To me, that is fully consistent with beIng "focused on
sensitive SUDpopulatlor:s." I: 2150 ce"lonstrates/Validates our commitment to the scienc~',data
Dase 0" perchlorate- researcr.
More times than not we should be more inclusive in our answers rather
than Just answer the QueSTiOn p"'esented. I'" do my best to help,
thanks
Col Dan Rogers

:\:r !'llrcc'utflCC (If l'r():~',slclnJ; 1{::':'0:1':"':lil\
AFLSA PI,
()r
Chid' En\lronrncnwl La\~ and Llllg:ItIN'

, ·\Ci:
·····Origmal Message·--··
From: (otter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL
Sent: Tuesday, May 13,2003 E'46 AM
To: Cornel!, Jeff, Lt. Coi., SAFflE; Rogers, Daniel, Col, AFLSAjJACE
Message
Subject: FW: DoD reviSlonOIRAedlt111
Jet Dan
Is RIchard's statement conslster,t wltn wnat VOu Know aDOu: ou' researCh';'
Sanoy
-----Original r-1essage----
From: Richard B. Belzer PhD [mallto:rbbelzer@cox.netJ
Sent: Monday, May 12,20035:57 PM
To: '(otter, Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL.'
SUbject: RE: ODD revlSlonOJ RAedltlll
As I understand it, DoD-funoec perchlorate health effects research has been focused on
determining the extent to which the fetus is especially vulnerable. T6 me, rna: IS fully
consistent with being "focusea on sensitive sUbpopulations." Indeed, since there Isn't any
risk to healtny aaults (anC EPA does not claim that any such risk exists), virtually all of
tne researcn has Deen so focused.
RB6
-----Onginal Message--'-
From: Cotter, Sandra, r'-1s. OSD-ATL
Sent: Monday, 12 May 03 16:27PM
To: 'regcheck@mail.con'"
Cc: Kratz, Kurt. , 050-:"-;_
SUbject: RE: 000 revlslanOJRAeditlll
Thanks Rick gooe ::c~-ne~ts 1'1 Include In our craft reSDonSe
·----Onglnal r-.'essage-····
From: Richard E, Belze' PhD [mallto:rbbelzer@cox.netJ
Sent: Monda,,·. r-1av L:, 2003 4:14 PM
To: Sandy Cctter
Subject: DoD revlslonOlRAed,t1l1
Importance: High
My comments In double underlined and double strikethrough. Please

forward as appropriate.
RBB
Unknown
From: Kratz Kurt OSD-ATL

Sent: Monday, June 02 20030904
To: Cornell. Jeff. Lt Co.l. SAFflE
Cc: ChQudhury. Shah, Mr OSD-ATL Cotter, Sandra. Ms., OSD-ATL. Cohen, Ben M·· Dc::J OGe
Subject: RE. NAS PerChlorate Proposal and IWG mtg on June 3
.... '2 : : ,
.. .
! .. ;..... -•.
, .:.::. - .•
~
. . ,.....-..=
-.-. ....-"-. -..........
- ._.J
--,>Y
·JS:- -.:'.::"
Tc: ?au: _
~r
v. :'Jne _
::na:
:-cS~ .
~;e:: :
: :; .....- . ~ ....: :: ,
............. _ ,. 9 ...
= '.:-.~ ~ ~ tiop:.nq
5S
-:';',:: ::13.: os: . do:eed :0 a
··.:ou
-----:~.:..8.:.::2. ..
~ ~.'~
?:-°PCSc':' _ ,I": ", ... ...1 .........
=~por~a~:e: ~:c~
?e:-::: . . . .:.o~a":e :
per=~_~~a:~ =e~le~. ~ ... ea..se

~~ ~~e pe~so~~el a~d
:S~e ~::achej ::le: ~~:.Ferc~~o~a:~ :~;~S~10~.~e~nessey.do~)(See

a::2.:::;e:: :.:._e: Pe:::::-.~cro:.e. key
pe::scr;"e:. ::cc. >:ls: (See attached :lle:
3loske:c~ v_ ~_~e~ A.80C' (See c::a=~e~ ~ __ e: ?e~~hlo=ate Inges~io~.=~~e~
Pa~e.c=: :Se~ a::a::hec :.:._e: ?:::p:5a:.~e==~_o=a:e.RevlsecAp::ll '7
~_s: a:-a=~e~ fo= =e~':e~ a~e =c=u~e~:s :~: the pe:chlo:a:e

:~~ 2~=~6:
:a5;:. ?_ease fo:~s vc~~ rev:ew 2:ceptabll::y of p=oposet laoo~,
C~ :~e
:ra~r2: a~c c~:s. Dc you co~s:~e~ :~e ~u~be~ and mix of people to be
Gpp=o~:i3:e: A~e ~r;e ~~u~be~ a~c c~=a::~~ ~; :~:cs reasonable? Is the
--""... -
'_.'_"_~'.~"- ...
:;,ee ._ • I .:~~e ::. :rom 3: CC :0

~~.:'.3 :e::nnlcal p:rcposal.
~:c'';:- represe~~2: t i ve h'':' __ ..:.
c:: :ne pro~ose':'
...
....... -
. t.-:p d' ; See a,:: a .: .'l-= S :.:. _ e :
. _........ - - : ' :::(0 ~_. ::",~eme,;~ c: -,-;c:-'., :~.~ aae;:Cl6'S w:l~ be

S;:',:~.:::::-.:.r.-;
cccc~:u;:::~ ::o~.:.;:a:e :a::=_~~-0~ ;-. cc::s:ce::a:':'CG by the NAS
~s :e~:e~ ?6~~: ne~~e=s. A~y ~o~:~a:.~~~ ~_t~ a:. a=co~~anYlriq cv: ~eec
~- F~2~'_ae~ :c ~n8 NAS ~.:.:~:~ :~:E ~~}:: :~~ ~eeKS. We ~~:_ diSCUSE
:... .. 50 >~a::-:;e· ...' s
~?A :o~:~a~::~; O~~ice~ls Re~~ese~:5::'!~
2
Un'known
From: Cotter. Sandra, Ms, OSD-ATL

Sent: Wednesday, May 07,200311'15
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col .. SAF/IE, Choudhury. Shah, Mr OSD-ATL. Cohen, Ben, Mr Do:' :.::;:
Ledbetter, George, COL, 000 OGC; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL. 'RIchard B. Belzer PnC Oar
Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and ReId Letter
In addition to changes suggested in the attachments, OIRA also had general comments
= ? : :. s- : ;::::. til";
Recore ?ype: Reco.::e
To: ~. Holl~ ~~~:e.::/O~E/EO?@EO?
=c: See :~e d~S~~~bU:io~ l:s: a~ :~e 28::0~ 0: ~his message
b~"'"
Subjec:: Re: DoC Response to Sena:cr Boxer o~ Perchlorate (Documer.: _:nK: _.
Hol_) ::..::er'
Hc:"ly
Attac~e= a=e 5~gges~ej
edlts tc :h~ ~:: ~esponse. In addition ~o these ed~ts, we ~ave some
Droaae~ =c~~e~~3 WE would like :c see a=~~e5sed:
- the ~es~2~se G~es no: =esponc :c :~~ 5:~~eIe~: ~na: "nearly" all ~he per2~:orate
p.::oc~=ec :..~. :~: .= :"5 usee cy oe~ense a~c s~a=~ programs. Is this true? can DoD pro~lde
'..J.S v.;.:.:.~. c S:'a:':"S:':': (~\.1sage). :.r:.:...= I,.yl2_~:: :;,~ :~:':orrrla:.ivE::.
-~0~ ~ss;o~se 80~~ ~2: ad~=ess :8~=e~~E ~e~:==:~g ~he Colorado Rive~ a~d He~oe~so~
:a:~~::~. Jc: s~c~~c d~scuss whc: :5 ~5~~E~:~~ a~ ~ha: siLe.
-·:ne ~espc~s~ S~O~:8 ~o=us ~c~e C~ :_~~~~~ e~forts and what ~s curren:l~' being' aone.
:~e Dcxe~ _~::e: ~a:Ks abo~: cc~=e:~5 re~ar~:..~; cleanup re~ponsibilitles as we:l a~ delays
.:.~ =lc:",~:'''::::- ..;~. __ ;c: v-:a:"::";.g toY" a ~;::":-.,::":-,:: wa:",r s:a:-;daY"d. DoDs response to :he aela~' co:;cern
s:a:e~ C~_" :~a: :ne~ suppor: EP~ t:~cr:E := ~cv'" forward. I : would be beneficial fer DoC
:c ~esp~~c ~c :~~5 ~~ a pos:::ve ~as~:c~. b~' me~::o~lng ~ne types of clea~up5 ~nat are
::u==e;.:':'~. c:::=~:-:::-::l:;.
7:--. .:.s cot.,;,.1:;, :..:.e ':":-.:: :'~.€- se::.:.:>r. whe:re DoD discusses -:.he S25·ffi:...':'lion
::ney spe::c. ....... :':--S6:.;r,en:. t.ec~n;) .... og~:.
::ianks,
..m
'
Unknown
From: Cotter. Sandra. Ms, OSD-ATL

Sent: Wednesday, May 07. 200311'15
To: Cornell, Jeff. Lt. Col, SAFflE: ChOudhury, Shah. Mr. OSD-ATL: Cohen. Ben. Mr DoD OG2
Ledbetter, George, COL, DoDOGC; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; 'Richard S. Selzer P~J ':Ja~
Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein,Boxer. and Reid Letter
In addition to changes suggested in the attachments, OIRA also had general comments:
Nancy Bec~: 507

05/07/2003 09:19:22 N~
Record Type: Record
To: ~. Holl~ Fltte~/OMB/EOP@EOP

See tne Glstrlbutio~ l:st at the cct:ore o! this message
Subject: Re: DoD Response to Senato~ Boxer o~ Perchlorate (Document link: ~.

Ho':"l'/ :'::te:-,
Holly
At~ached are s~ggested edi~s to the ~o: ~esponse. :n addition to these edits, we have some:
broader conce~ns we would like to see ad~ressed:
- tne respe:-lse does no: respond to the s:a:eme:-.: that "nearly" a:: the percr.2.orate
p~od~ced l~ :ne C~ :s used by defense a~G space programs. Is this t~ue? can 000 provlde
-lS \t,;: :t-'. c s::.a-:is,::-:: (>Cusage:. t.:-.:.s wc·.... _::: Do:: :~.:2:-rr.at.ive.
-:ne respense snc~:a ~ceus

more o~ J:: :_ea~~~ e~forts and what is currently being done.
~~e DO}:e~ _~:~e= :c~KS
aboc: 2c~=e~~~ ~e~~:~:~~ ~~eanup responsibili~ies as well as delays
~:- ~:ean~~ ~~::~ wa~::ng fo~ a a~~~~:~=~ ~a:e: s:anda~d. DaDs response ~c the aelay concern
states O!.~~ :na: :ney support EP~ e~~o~~s :: reeve forward. It would be beneficial for DoD
:0 respond :0 :n:s ~n a positive !as~:o~ ~y me~::on:ng the types o! cleanups that are
cu~rently eccurr:n~. ~r.1S could :le in:: :ne sec::on where DoD discusses the S25milllon
:ne~' speno on treatment technolo?y.
:~janks ,
t~a:1:'~:
See a::a=~e~ ~ __ ~: D
,...0
r-f~ __
Unknown

Sent: Wednesday May 07, 20031413
To: 'regcheck@mail com'
Subject: RE OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
-----c::- ..:..g:!"";b._ ~'1essag-=-----

B~':":e:-
'i r\
Se~: K~~~.esc3~1 Ma~
r'\
L .....' \..., .:. : \..-' ~
Tc': 'CJ:rE':, 5a:-.:::-.=., 8S[-.:':::" I
.::-.7":.'- .."""r:::--
' "'" - _.. , 3Clxe::-,
0 ' ,..
-----:~:;:~~. ~eS5aJe-----
:: 7..:.:--.s:ei::, Box'2!:' , and Re2-c
.:':::.- ,
30xe r , an:: Held
sc:-,e ::..::' "'~'
~..:..~:~a: ~essac~-----
s ~ :::.: :.~ .~ :l:-. t S :::: s ::' I..;
Cc:-:->,:,-~:, je::, :c':'. -.--,

_,
.. ..
..........
~ ~ .. -.
'..I . . . . . . . . .~ , ::JSJ-l'.'":'L:
0:;:; ~e:ibe:~e:- I Krac:::, FU:-i::,
.:::::" ......... c..- .•
'-'............
~ ' ' ",~,-• . f:):" responses v .. ::;;'0 :o:::.::-.s:.e:r-., Soxer, 6r:C Re_G ':"'e!ter
vIne:; : :00: ::OJ ?r~-3:0C t:astern T.:.me

:US &
::ar.3dc:
;~; her c:: 3 :-~. r: ~
We've re'::e.:. ve:: ::..~.-., '••~ 7
mee: PI"
- :::::. • • I _.. _---"'

~-
\.;:: :...
\.: - -=~.
<. < ...... - - - -
2
Honorable Harry Reid
United States Senate
Washington. DC. 20510
Dear Senator Reid,
Thank you for your recent letter in which you expressed concerns that the
Department of Defense's (DoD's) proposed Readiness and Range Preservatio.n Initiative
(RRPI) legislation will limit our legal responsibility to address Defense-related
perchlorate contamination in drinking water supplies. The Department is committed to
sustaining our test and training capabilities in a manner that fully satisfies the military
readiness mission. is protective of public health both on our installations and in
neighboring communities. and provides exemplary stewardship of the lands and natural
resources entrusted to the 000 by Congress.
Perchlorate regulation may impact the ability of the Defense Department. National
Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). and other agencies to execute
fundamental aspects of their missions. (OIRA Suggest deleting: As you know,
perchlorate salts are used as a combustion accelerant and explosives in solid-fueled
rockets and missiles. munitions. explosives. and pyrotechnics. 000 and NASA are far
from the only users of perchlorate: it has been used in numerous other items. including
fireworks. flares. automobile airbags. phannaceuticals. and nitrate-based fertilizer
products. and replace wi agreed upon usage language: Perchlorate is a chemical that
has been used in various items, including missile and rocket propellants, munitions,
fireworks, flares, fertilizer, automobile airbags, and pharmaceuticals. Perchlorate has
important applications for national defense and space exploration. In addition, the
response does not respond·to the statement that "near(r" all the percltlorate produced
in tlte US is used by defense and space programs. Is this true? can DoD provide us
with a statistic (%usage). this would be informative.)
-(EPA: Factually inaccurate. It is only in some caliche containing fertilizers. EPA
study conducted with the fertilizer institute has shown restricted usage of this type
of fertilizer for major crops. Manufacturer of Bulldog Soda (SOM) claims to
changed content as well. Suggest: and some caliche-based fertilizer products of
restricted usage.)
(OIRA suggests deleting this paragraph: This is not necessary as a

question/statement regarding perchlorates national defense applications and national
security was not mentioned in the letter.) It is. however. correct that perchlorate' s
national defense applications are of fundamental importance to national securit~ ,
Perchlorate salts are the primary oxidizers in composite propellants and explosi\'es, The:
are critical to the safe and effective perfonnance of systems ranging from tactical missiles
such as Sidewinder. AMRAAM. and Tomahav.'k to strategic missiles such as Minuteman.
the Space Shuttle boosters, and all boosters in development for national missile defense.
Over 100 rocket motors currently in production use perchlorate. as do a ver: large arra:
of weapons and weapons systems ranging from smoke. obscurant. flare. and illumination
devices to grenades. projectiles of all kinds. mines. high explosives. and even
cartridges-hundreds of types of munitions and weapons in all. No satisfactor:
substitute for perchlorate in these applications currently exists. (EPA: 1\ ASA article
(see attached) suggests paraffin-based replacement offers increased control of burn
and is better for environment.)
Your letter expresses concern that the Department" s proposed RPPI legislation
could limit its financial liability or cleanup responsibilities with respect to perchlorate.
Nothing in RRPI affects the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). which gives the US
Environmental Protection Agency broad authority to take such actions as it "may deem
necessar:' to protect the health" of persons facing "an imminent and substantial
endangennent"' resulting from a contaminant that is present in. or is likely to enter. a
public water system or an underground source of drinking water. These actions are
enforceable by civil penalties of up to S15.000 per day. Because this authority is not
limited to CERCLA "releases" or off-range migration. it empowers EPA to issue orders
to address endangennent either on-range or off-range. and to address possible
contamination before it migrates off-range.
Some observers have also expressed concern that RRPI could protect DoD
contractors from liability for cleanup of perchlorate or other chemicals. This was not the
intent of our proposal. and as DoD testi fied recently before Congress. EPA and DoD have
developed revised legislative language making this point unambiguously clear.
Since 1997. the Department. in partnership with EPA. NASA. State and local
-
regulators. and Native American tribes. has worked agl2:ressivelv
_..... .. to detennine whether
(EPA) low le'f'el ambient contamination (what is a '''Iow'' level for endocrine
disruption when hormones b)' definition are designed to act at nanomolar and
picomoJar levels?) of perchlorate pose e:tiposure poses a hazard to the American public.
and to infonn and involve stakeholders about research developments in this area. The
Administration is committed to developing health risk assessments that are objective,
realistic. and scientifically sound bola need. to serve as the basis of credible and basing
risk management decisions on this scientific foundation.
(DIRA: This paragraph leads the reader to believe that most ofthe 29$ million is
spent on human health research, where ill fact 25$ million goes to Ireatmen~
,technology development. thus it needs 10 be reworked. Suggested edits are: The
Department has been at thejD,e!Ff:mt ~factively involved in research into the potential
health effects of perchlorate. the conditions under which these risks might arise. and to a
limited extent, whether the extent to whieh there may be subpopulations of special
vulnerability (EPA: DoD asked that the studies addressing special vulnerabilit~ be
thrown out. e.g., the developmental neurotoxicity studies). DoD has invested over
$29 million 10 develop innovative treatment technologies and helped Ie- better
characterize the potential human health and environmental risks associated with
perchlorate. and f.8 del>'elep inneyati.'e 1FeatIHent technelegies (EPA: the majority of
this cost is for treatment technolo~' used for'recovery and not for "low" level
operations.). Tlte Department has Iflade a significant iRyestIHent in pel'chkn'ate,
rehlte« I'eseal'ch. In doing this. DoD worked closely with EPA to establish the research
agenda and study protocols. DeD scientists haye thelflSelYes cenihlcted lflallJ'
independent studies 18 RSsess the petentia! I'isks anti effeets efpel'chwl'ate expesure.
(DIRA: This paragraph is not necessary. Perchlorate is not on the IRIS

database thus comparing a draft assessment to this database is irrevelant. Suggest
deleting it all.) As a result of this close cooperation and DoD's proactive participation.
the science needed to characterize the potential risk fI=&m associated with ffiw- ambient
levels of perchlorate exposure was generated in an accelerated manner. The resulting
perchlorate database is more robust than many in EPA's Integrated Risk Infonnation
System
- (IRI S). as evidenced
. .
by estimations of overall confidence. size of uncertainty
factor. and types of available data. Particularly helpful is the availability of the
developmental neurotoxicity studies which assess the ke)' endpoints of concern and
human pharmacokinetic data that allowed the AFRL to develop interspecies
extrapolation models. human clinical trial data whicb permit the derivation of safe
exposure levels without ha,'ing to rel~' on highl~' uneertain and eonsen'ati,'e
extrapolations from animals. in this ease rats. ( EPA:-Disagree. The extrapolations
were far from 'highly uncertain' and 'conservative' because: (I) The human and
lab animal data give the same estimates (2) the human data tell us nothing about
susceptible populations (3) rats are not sensitive for neurotoxic effects, in fact, they
ma~' be insensitive (4) these. are not clinical trials designed to give pharmacokinetic
information for modeling'puposes and (5) the RID estimate is not an estimate of a
"safe exposure level.")
(DoE: ... rrhis paragraph is] .
r
d
D6D scientists have genuine and well-founded disagreements with S6HIC ofthe
inferences and c6nclusi6ns in EPA's January' 2()()2 dra/tperchloFate health
assessment document, which C611tains preliminary' risk estimB1es that c6uld be used t6
establish an efficial Reference D6se (RfD). Enclosed. please find a copy of the
testimony that the Department presented to the California State Senate concerning
perchlorate research 61.1 this f/ueS#61l. The Department continues t6 work with EPA and
other stakeholders to develop scientifically-defensible decisions regarding perchlorate
use. assessment. and cleanup.
With the full support of DoD. NASA. and the Department of Energy. EPA hBS been
w61king t6 revise the 2()()2 dHJft healt-h BSsessment, and has decided to submit the
perchlorate health science issue to the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) in order to
resolve several underlying scientific questions (DIRA Incorporates DoE comment.)
EPA has infonned us that it will complete and disseminate a final risk assessment when
the NAS scientific review is concluded and the 2002 peer and public review comments
as well as the NAS comments are addressed. (EPA: Let us not forget EPA still has the
last review panel comments to incorporate)
Your letter expressed concern that a perchlorate standard might be years away
because of the time necessary to complete a SDWA standard. in addition to the time
required for the NAS study to be completed. We understand this concern, and support
EPA's efforts to move forward to promulgate a standard as expeditiously as possible. In
the meantime. we will work with EPA and the States to address any situation where there
is agreement that perchlorate poses an imminent and substantial danger to the public.
(DIRA: Perhaps it might be use/ulto say something here about JlOw the provisional
range can be used as a screening tool in site-specific risk assessment activities, ie/or
cleanups conducted under CERCU. Thus moving the/ocus away/rom the l~lCL
which is years away, but/ocusing on the/act that cleanups can currently be conducted
where necessar.y. More should be mentioned regarding current cleanups as well as
actions being taken at the Henderson/aeilit)'. )
You also expressed concern that the Department is not currently participating in the
funding of private cleanup activities at sites such as the Henderson facility. As you
know. existing laws provide well-established mechanisms by which private parties can
recover from the Department cleanup costs that are our responsibility. which are
available to private parties who believe that the Defense Department should participate in
the cost of perchlorate cleanup activities. Our RRPI proposal would have no effect on
these provisions. (DIRA: ...does not address concerns regarding the Colorado River
and Henderson/aeilit)'. DoD should discuss what is happening at that site.}
Finally. you have requested a detailed response on high-priority sites ihvol\'ing
perchlorate in drinking water. and the initial measures the Department might take to
address them. given available funding. This infonnation is currently being collected. I
have asked the Deputy Under Secretary (Installations & Environment) to provide a list to
you of active installations containing the infonnation you requested on an expedited
basis. which I expect would be by late May. (OIRA: the response shouldfocus more
on DoD cleanup efforts and what is currently being done. The boxer letter talks about
concerns regarding cleanup responsibilities as well as delays in cleanup while waiting
for a drinking water standard. DoDs response to the delay concern states on(r that they
support EPA efforts to moveforward. It would be beneficialfor DoD to respond to this
.in a positive fashion by mentioning the types ofcleanups that are currently occurring.
This could tie into the section where DoD discusses the $25mil/ion they spend on
treatment technology.)
The Department is the environmental steward of over 25 million acres of land that
have been entrusted by Congress to the Department to use efficiently and to care for
properly. In executing thes~ responsibilities we are committed to full compliance with
the applicable laws and regulations. We are committed to protecting, preserving. and,
when required. restoring. and enhancing the quality of the environment. Through the
Defense Environmental Restoration Program (DERP). we are cleaning up contamination
on our installations and are building a new program to address unexploded ordnance on
locations off of operational ranges.
The fact that the Department has invested in excess of $29 million on perchlorate
research and treatment technology development (EPA: as previously stated, probabl)'
only 50% of it was devoted to helath studies) is a clear indication of the Departmenfs
commitment to protect the health of the American people. This commitment is further
supported by our continued partnership with EPA to ensure that the Nation's leading
scientists are provided an opportunity to review the perchlorate database. Such a review
will ensure that risk characterization and subsequent risk management decisions are. in
fact. based on sound science.
The Department is committed to sustaining U.S. test and training capabilities in a

manner that fully satisfies our military readiness mission. is protective of human health.
and provides exemplary stewardship of the lands and natural resources entrusted to 000
by Congress. A similar letter has been provided to Senator Feinstein and Senator Boxer.
Sincerely.
Enclosure
Unknown
From: Cotter, Sandra, Ms. OSD-ATL

Sent: Wednesday. May 07, 2003 16:08
To: Cornell, Jeff. Lt. Col., SAFIIE: Choudhury. Shah. Mr. OSD-ATL: Cohen, Ben. Mr. DoD OGe
Ledbetter, George, COL, DoD OGC. Kratz. Kurt, , OSD-ATL. 'Richard B. Belzer P"'C' 'Oa
Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
Ive Inserted the responses we discussed (blue text) Into the redline/strikeout version containing OMB/EPA/Do s
~ 5d1
comments and changes, for use with OMB.
-----Original Appointment----
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAF/IE; Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter, George,
COL, DoD OGC; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; 'Richard B. Belzer PhD'; Dan Kowalczyk
SUbject: OMB/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
When: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US & canada).
Where: 3C765
Vo.'e'\'e r-e:::e::.ve:::: :::cr[une,.:s :r-o:; O!<::, ::::-8IT O::R;., EPA, and DoE. We'd 2.ike t.o meet to
d':'S::'.lS5 ccrr..:;~e:-::s ar-.c c;.::- =es!=~r:s"2.5 a: :: 0: PM today i : possible, ir. Kuyt Kratz 1 s
c::::.:::e. R::.:::k, Dc:--., we ca,. ::::-y : : ::.::::::'uae you by phone, if you wish.
« File: DOD Draft Response to Boxer 050503_comments,wpd» «File: Draft Response to

BoxerOlRAediLdoc» «File: DoLdoc »
Washington. DC. 20510
Dear Senator Reid,
Thank you for your recent lener in which you expressed concerns that the
Department of Defense's (DoD' s) proposed Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative
perchlorate contamination in drinking water supplies. The Department is commined to
neighboring communities. and provides exemplary stewardship of the lands and natural
resources entrusted to the DoD by Congress.
fundamental aspects of their missions. (OIRA Suggest deleting: As you know.
rockets and missiles. munitions. explosives. and pyrotechnics. DoD and NASA are far
from the only users of perchlorate: it has been used in numerous other items. including
fireworks. flares. automobile airbags. pharmaceuticals. and nitrate-based fertilizer
jireworks,flares,fertilizer, automobile airbags, and pharmaceuticals. Perchlorate has
important applications for national defense and space exploration. [Ok~~'. wilh till'
changt.'.IIn addition, the response does not respond to the statement that "nearly" all
the perchlorate produced in the US is used by defense and space programs. Is this
true? can DoD provide us with a statistic (%usage). this would be informative.) [What
\\ t' can say is ""'hile it is clear thai defensl' and span' USl'S dominatl' perchlorlltl' pmdm'tioll, the
numhl'" of sites at which low le\'els of perchloratc ~rl' dl'tl'cll'd is incn'asilll!l~ assol'iatl'd with 000
dl'fl'nsl' alld non-spacl' uses."1
changed content as well. Suggest: and some caliche-based fertilizer products of
restricted usage.) I\\-t.' han the ~\' Stall' I)l'pal"tment of He~lth and USGS studies, that do Dot
lI!!rt.'e with EPA's statement!'>. ,\0, thb ('ontrlldkts a~n·t.'d upon s()un't.'s of information. rF'·\ liJ,.c"
to t'iH' this stud~. seeming to sid(' "ith a trade commissionl
(DIRA suggests deleting this paragraph: This is not necessary as a

question/statement regarding perchlorates national defense applications and national
security was not mentioned in the letter.) IThis information provides the neecessal~ blllann',
01' a (·ounterhalance. to the science emphasis place on this issue in thc !t·tter.] It is, however.
correct that perchlorate's national defense applications are of fundamental importance to

national security. Perchlorate salts are the primary oxidizers in composite propellants
and explosives. They are critical to the safe and effective perfonnance of systems
ranging from tactical missiles such as Sidewinder, AMRAAM. and Tomahawk to
strategic missiles such as Minuteman. the Space Shuttle boosters, and all boosters in
development for national missile defense. Over 100 rocket motors currently in
production use perchlorate. as do a very large array of weapons and weapons systems
ranging from smoke. obscurant. flare, and illumination devices to grenades, projectiles of
all kinds. mines, high explosives, and even cartridges-hundreds of types of munitions
and weapons in all. No satisfactory substitute for perchlorate in these applications
currently exists. (EPA: NASA article (see attached) suggests paraffin-based
replacement offers increas'ed control of burn and is better for environment.) IDo not
accept. rPA b not an authority on thi~ suhi('d and should not attempt to opifll' on possihlt'
llltCl"flllti\ e~. DoD is in thc process of' c\'aluating lliternativei!>. but then' arc arc llO cunent i!>lIfl'
sub~titlJtes·1
Your lener expresses concern that the Department's proposed RPPI legislation
could limit its financial liability or cleanup responsibilities with respect to perchlorate,
Nothing in RRPI affects the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA), which gives the US
necessary to protect the health" of persons facing "an imminent and substantial
endangerment" resulting from a contaminant that is present in. or is likely to enter. a
public water system or an underground source of drinking water. These actions are
enforceable by civil penalties of up to $15,000 per day, Because this authority is not
to address endangennent either on-range or off-range, and to address possible
Some observers have also expressed concern that RRPI could protect DoD
contractors from liability for cleanup of perchlorate or other chemicals, This was not the
intent of our proposaL and as 000 testified recently before Congress. EPA and 000 have
Since 1997, the Department, in partnership with EPA, NASA, State and local
regulators, and Native American tribes. has worked aggressively to detennine whether
(EPA) low le'f'el ambient contamination (what is a ·'Iow" level for endocrine
disruption when hormones by definition are designed to act at nanomolar and
picomolar levels?) I DoD has three prohlem~ \\ith the..e changes: 11 the notion th:lt FP\ j,
ach ant'ing that an~ 1(', el of perchlorau.· could be a l"isk. not recognizing that then' could bt: ;1
threshold at '" hich pt'rchloratc could C:IUSt' a risk: h('nt'c the tt'rm. "ambit'nt" a!'o OPPO~l"tJ to "Im\
It'nr·. 2) thai perchloratl' is an endocrin(' disruptor: tlWrt, is no (" idem·t' to thaI <.'ffet't. alld 31 t!H
use of Iht, terlll conlamination. instead of t'xposun', I perchlorate pose exposure poses a
hazard to the American public. and to infonn and involve stakeholders about research
developments in this area, The Administration is committed to developing health risk
assessments that are objective, realistic. and scientifically sound balaneed. to sern as
the basis of credible and basing risk management decisions on this seientifie
foundation. I Suggest \~(' present' September 200] O\-lB guidance on regulator~· re\'ie\\. tlrat
requires ··s('ientificall~· hnlanced' and "b:tsing risk management det'isions on these ohjl'ctin.
realistit.. and scientifically balanced" assessmenb.1
(DIRA: This paragraph leads the reader to believe that most ofthe 29$ millioll is
spellt 011 human health research, where in fact 25$ million goes to treatment
technology development, thus it needs to be reworked. Suggested" edits are: The
Department has been at thefa1'efhmt o}actively involved in research into the potential
limited extent. whether the extent to whieh there may be subpopulations of special
vulnerability (EPA: DoD asked that the studies addressing special vulnerability be
thrown out. e.g.• the developmental neurotoxicity studies). 000 has invested over
$29 million to develop innovative treatment technologies and helped Ie- better
perchlorate. lind te develop inllevalive l1'eaU"ent tec!tHelegies (EPA: the majority of
this cost is for treatment technology used for recovery and not for ""low" level
operations.). The DeplInmeNt hlls mllde a significant investment in pe1'Chle1'lIte
1'elaled 1'esea1'ch. In doing this. 000 worked closely with EPA to establish the research
agenda and study protocols. DeD scientists hal'e themselves cenducled mllllY
independent slHmes t6 assess the petelltilllris!is lIlId effects e-!pe"e!,le"lIle expeSUFe.
IAgn.'l' in part: \\t' will re\'ise tire lirst Sl'ntellt't' til n'ad "Thl.' Ikpartml.'nt ha5> spent some S~ million
011 n.'sear·ch into the potential health effl'ct~ of perchlorate. the t'onditions under which tlrest' risk...
might arise. and tire t'xtent to \\ hit'h tlrt'rl' ma~ ht, .. uhpopulations of special ,·ulnenlhilit~:· "III
doin~ thi~. 1)01) worked c1osel~ with EPA to estahlish tht' research agenda and stud~· protot'ols,"
(ad,1 the following from the next paral!raph "As a rl.'sult of this close cooperation and DoD's
proactin participation. the science needed to chanlcttTin' the potentia! risk associated with I,m
len'ls of perdllor'ate exposure was gellt'nltl.'d ill an accelt'l'atl'd mannc,.:· "1)0J) hm also in\'ested
Il\er S25 million til develop illno\'ati\l' trcatml'nt ll'chnologit,s for' pcn·hlonttl'. ilTespccti\l' of
\\ hether' thl' t'hemical posed :t risk. "J
(DIRA: This paragraph is not necessar....'. Perchlorate is not on the IRIS
database thus comparing a draft assessment to this database is irrevelant. Suggest
deleting it al/.) IOk.:I~·] As a result of this close cooperation and DoD's proactive
participation, the science needed to characterize the potential risk fF6.m associated with
I6w- ambient levels of perchlorate exposure was generated in an accelerated manner.
The resulting perchlorate database is more robust than many in EPA's Integrated Risk
.
Infonnation Svstem (IRIS), as evidenced bv. estimations of overall confidence. size of
uncertainty factor, and types of available data. Particularly helpful is the availabilir: of
the developmental neurotoxicity studies which assess the key endpoints of concern
and human pharmacokinetic data that allowed the AFRL to develop interspecie~
extrapolation models. human clinical trial data which pernlit the deri~'ation of safe
exposure leyels without haYing to rely on bighl~' uncertain and eORserYath'e
extrapolations from animals, in this ease rats. ( EPA:-Disagree. The extrapolations
were far from 'highl~' uncertain' and 'conservative' because: (1) The human and
lab animal data give the same estimates (2) the human data tell us nothing about
susceptible populations (3) rats are not sensitive for neurotoxic effects. in fact, the~'
may be insensitive (4) these are not clinical trials designed to give pharmacokinetic
information for modeling puposes and (5) the RID estimate is not an estimate of a
"safe exposure leveL") IEPA 'l!> point~ an' true onl~ if ~:ou manipulah.' th(' uncl'rtainl~' factol'!-.
This is tht.' hl'art of ou .. dispute. \\ e don't bdievt.' thl' extrapolation models arc appropriate.
EPA'~ chan~ed text slie" the facts. sug~estin:.: that the human dnta was only intended to populak
Ihl'ir animal model. \\ e'n' not heen persuaded this point is true ~lt all.,
(DoE: ... [This paragraph is]
r
DoD scientists !zRl'e genuine Rn" wel!:f9unde" "isRg"eements with some 9fthe
illfe"ellces RIl" conclusions in EPA's umuBFy 2(}(J2 di"Rjtpero!lIo1'R1e heBlth
RSSessmenl document, w!Iich con1Ri~,s preliminRFy risk estimBtes thRt coulfJ he used to
estRhlish Rn effieiRI Reje"ence Dose (RfD). IThi~ is an important point for DoD: II has bl'l'n
reported in the pl'ess, that thl' only thin:.: Don cares about is thc mOlle~' it will cost to cleanup thesl'
.. ites. Thi<; .iust isn't tht, case. If EPA doesn't want it to appear that th('~' agret' with this statemt'nt
suggest changing the sentcnn' ~I!\ follo\\!-: "))0)) and scil'ntists have si~lIiticant disagrecffient!- with
SOffil' of thl' inrerellces and conclusiolls in EPA'~ ,Ianuar~ 211112 druft perchlorate Iwalth aSSl'ssml'nt
document. which contains preliminary riSk l'stimatl's that could he lIsed to estahlish all official
RcI'erence Dose (RID). Enclosed, please find a copy of the testimony that the Department
presented to the California State Senate concerning perchlorate research on this
question. lok.. y] The Department continues to work with EPA and other stakeholders to
develop scientifically-defensible decisions regarding perchlorate use. assessment. and
cleanup.
With the full support of 000. NASA. and the Department of Energy, EPA hRS been
working to "e.'ise the 2(}(J2 dTll/t heR/til RSSessmenl, Bnd I okaYI has decided to submit the
resolve several underlying scientific questions (OIRA Incorporates DoE comment.)
the NAS scientific review is concluded and the 2002 peer and public review comments
as well as the NAS comments are addressed. (EPA: Let us not forget EPA stHI has the
last review panel comments to incorporate) I Do not agree with EPA's change to
this sentence. DoD is concerned what EPA might be inferring with this change~ it'
could suggest that EPA is leaving open the option of trumping the Academy with
other data. We have all agreed that agencies will submit comments directly to l\AS.
not only EPA. I
Your letter expressed concern that a perchlorate standard might be years away
because of the time necessary to complete a SDWA standard. in addition to-the time
required for the NAS study to be completed. We understand this concern, and support
EPA's efforts to move forward to promulgate a standard as expeditiously as possible. In
the meantime. we will work with EPA and the States to address any situation where there
is agreement that perchlorate poses an imminent and substantial danger to the public.
(DIRA: Perhaps it might be useful to say something here about how the provisional
range can be used as a screening tool in site-specific risk assessment activities, ie for
cleanups conducted under CERCLA. Thus moving thefocus away from the MCL
which is years away, but focusing on the fact that cleanups can currently be conducted
where necessary. I Can't agree 10 this a:- a matter uf la\\.1 More should be mentioned
regarding current cleanups as well as actions being taken at the Henderson facility. ) I
"'hat \\l' (ll"Ovidl' in the .follm\ ing I)anl~ra(lh is ~IPJlrClpriatc. \\"c do not h~,,'(· cleanup rl'sp()nsihilit~
:It IlwJh'nd('r~on facifit~. at least f101 (Iirl:'ctl). Thi~ is a matter to bring to Kerr-McG('("s attention.
not Ihl' Ikpartmcnt.1
You also expressed concern that the,Department is not currently participating in the
funding of private cleanup activities at sites such as the Henderson facility, As you
know. existing laws provide well-established mechanisms by which private parties can
recover from the Department cleanup costs that are our responsibility. which are
available to private parties who believe that the Defense Department should participate in
the cost of perchlorate cleanup activities. Our RRPI proposal would have no effect on
these provisions. (DIRA: ...does not address concerns regarding the Colorado River
and Henderson facility. DoD should discuss what is happening at that site.) I Sec
('omm('nt !ll'o\'idl:'t1 :1ho\'l:'.1 .
Finally. you have requested a detailed response on high-priority sites involving

perchlorate in drinking water. and the initial measures the Department might take to
address them. given available funding. This infonnation is currently being collected. I
have asked the Deputy Under Secretary Onstallations & Environment) to provide a list to
you of active installations containing the infonnation you requested on an expedited
basis. which I expect would be by late May. (DIRA: the response shouldfocus more
on DoD cleanup efforts and what is current(r being done. The boxer letter talks about
From: Cotter, Sandra, Ms. OSD-ATL
Sent: Wednesday. May 07. 2003 11 :15
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAF/IE: Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL. Cohen, Ben. Mr. 000 OGC.
Ledbetter, George, COL, 000 OGC; Kratz, Kurt, , OSD-ATL. 'Richard B Belzer PhD'; 'Dan
Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
In addition to changes suggested In the attachments. OIRA also had general comments:
Nancy Beck
05/07/2003 09:19:22 AM
Record Type: Record
TO: E. Holly Fitter

cc: See the distribution list at the bottom of this message
bcc:
Subject: Re: DoD Response to Senator Boxer on Perchlorate (Document link: E.
Holly Fitter)
Holly-
Attached are suggested edits to the DoD response. In addition to these edits, we have some
broader concerns we would like to see addressed:
- the response does not respond to the statement that "nearly" all the perchlorate
produced in the US is used by defense and space programs. Is this true? can DoD prov'i,de
us with a statlstlc (tusage). this would be lnformative.
-the response does not address concerns regarding the Colorado River and Henderson
facility. 000 should discuss what is happenlng at that site.
-the response should focus more on DoQ cleanup efforts and what is currently being done.
The boxer letter talks about concerns regarding cleanup responsibilities as well as delays
in cleanup while waiting for a drlnklng water standard. DaDs· response to the delay concern
states only that they support EPA efforts to move forward. It would be beneficial for DoD
to respond to th~s in a positive fashion by mentioning the types of cleanups that are
currently occurrlng. This could tie into the sect~on where DoD discusses the $25million
they spend on treatment technology.
thanks,
Nancy
(See attached file: Draft Response to BoxerOIRAedit.doc)
Unknown

Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 16'54
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col. SAFflE, Choudhury, Shah, Mr OSD-ATL; Cohen, Sen, Mr DoD OGe
Ledbetter. George, COL. DoD OGC, Kratz. Kurt.. OSD-ATL. 'Richard B Selzer p. =' 'Da~
Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMS/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstem. Soxer. and Reid Letter
If you agree with the attached responses and reVised letter. I'll forward to OMS,
51/
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 4:08 PM
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAF/IE; Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter, George,
COL, DoD OGC; Kraa, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; 'Richard B. Belzer PhD'; 'Dan Kowalczyk'
Subject: RE: OMB/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
I've inserted the responses we discussed (blue text) into the redhne/strikeout version containing OMS/EPA/DoE's
comments and changes, for use with OMS. «File OMS-EPA-DoE with DoD responses.doc »
-----Original Appointment----
Sent: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 10:50 AM
To: Cornell, Jeff, Lt. Col., SAF/lE; Choudhury, Shah, Mr, OSD-ATL; Cohen, Ben, Mr, DoD OGC; Ledbetter,
George, COL, DoD OGC; Kraa, Kurt, , OSD-ATL; 'Richard B. Belzer PhD'; Dan Kowalczyk
Subject: OMB/EPA/DoE responses on the Feinstein, Boxer, and Reid Letter
When: Wednesday, May 07, 2003 2:00 PM-3:00 PM (GMT-05:00) Eastern Time (US & canada).
Where: 3C765
V;"".''C' cece:.vec COITy-ne:-::::: ~-~- O,':=:, ::-cr. OIRK, EPA, and DoE. We'd llke to meet
:.~ d:,s:l:sS ::orruTler.~s a:-.:: ="2s~::~ses a:. 2: 00 PM today l: possiDle, if: Ku.rt:
":.:-",:::'5 :::::.ce. E:'CI~, :'''':-., ,,''C' 22::-. ::-} :c include yo\.; by phone, i: yo\..: wish.
s:
«File: DOD Draft Response to Boxer 050503_comments.wpd» «File: Draft Response to
BoxerOIRAedit.doc» «File: DoE.doc »
Washington, DC. 205 10
Dear Senator Reid,
Thank you for your recent letter in which you expressed concerns that the
Department of Defense's (DoD's) proposed Readiness and Range Preservation Initiative
perchlorate contamination in drinking water supplies. The Department is committed to
neighboring communities, and provides exemplary stewardship of the lands and natural
resources entrusted to the DoD by Congress.
fundamental aspects of their missions. (OIRA Suggest deleting: As you know,
rockets and missiles, munitions. explosiYes, and pyrotechnics. DoD and NASA are far
from the only users of perchlorate: it has been used in numerous other items, including
fireworks. flares. automobile airbags. pharmaceuticals, and nitrate-based fertilizer
jireworks,flares,fertilizer, automobile airbags, and pharmaceuticals. Perchlorate has
important applications for national defense and space exploration. IOka~" wilh tht,
changt. J In addition, the response does not respond to the statement that "nearly" all
the perclzlorate produced in the US is used by defense and space programs. Is this
true? can DoD provide us with a statistic (%usage). this would be informative.) [What
\\ t' can say is "\\'hilc it is clcar that defense and span' USt'S dominntt' flcn'hlomtt' IU'odlll,tion, tlu.'
numlwr of-silcs al which low Icnls of pcrchloratl' art dttt'ctt'd is inereasingl~' assoeiatt'd Wilh oon
Ikft'nSl' a IIlI non-sflace IIses."1
changed content as wen. Suggest: and some caliche-based fertilizer products of
restricted usage.) IWI.' hUH the ,\,y ~1:Jlt' f)qlUl'lmt'nl of Ht'alth and l'SeS Sllldil':--. Ih:ll do IIl1t
agl·c!.' with EPA'!> statements,l
(OIRA suggests deleting this paragraph: This is not necessary as a

question/statement regarding perch/orates national defense apjJlications and national
security was not mentioned in the letter.) IThis information prmides tht, nI.'Cl't'SS:t,~ halanl't'
to the sciellt'e emphasis phll'l' 011 this issue in the lettel'./ It is. however. correct that
perchlorate's national defense applications are of fundamental importance to national
security. Perchlorate s'J,lts are the primary oxidizers in composite propellants and
explosives. They are critical to the safe and effective performance of systems ranging
from tactical missiles such as Sidewinder. AMRAAM. and Tomahawk to strategic
missiles such as Minuteman. the Space Shunle boosters. and all boosters in development
for national missile defense. Over 100 rocket motors currently in production use
perchlorate. as do a very large array of weapons and weapons systems ranging from
smoke. obscurant. flare. and illumination devices to grenades. projectiles of all kinds.
mines. high explosives. and even cartridges-hundreds of types of munitions and
weapons in all. No satisfactory substitute for perchlorate in these applications currently
exists. (EPA: NASA article (see attached) suggests paraffin-based replacement
offers increased control of burn and is better for environment.) 100 not al·Cl.'pl. 000 is
in til(: process of ('\'aillatill:! altcrn~lti\ t·.... hUI Ihen' art' 110 runent safe suhstitutes in USI.' at this
timc.]
Your letter expresses concern that the Department's proposed RPPI legislation
could limit its financial liability or cleanup responsibilities with respect to perchlorate.
Nothing in RRPI affects the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA). which gives the US
necessary to protect the health" of persons facing "an imminent and substantial
endangennenC resulting from a contaminant that is present in. or is likely to enter. a
pUblic water system or an underground source of drinking water. These actions are
enforceable by civil penalties of up to $15.000 per day. Because this authority is not
to address endangennent either on-range or off-range. and to address possible
Some observers have also expressed concern that RRPI could protect 000
contractors from liability for cleanup of perchlorate or other chemicals. This was not the
intent of our proposal. and as DoD testified recently before Congress. EPA and DoD have
Since 1997. the Department. in partnership with EPA. NASA. State and local
regulators. and Native American tribes. has worked aggressively to determine whether
(EPA) low le~'el ambient contamination (what is a ""low" level for endocrine
disruption when hormones by definition are designed to act at nanomolar and
picomolar levels?) I DoD has thrl'e prohlems with these changes: 1) the notion that F.P\ j,
ad,·ancinl! that any Inel of perchlorah: could be a risk. not recognizing ttmt there coulel he: ~I
threshold at \\ hieh pt'rchlorate could caust· a ri~k; ht'nce tht' tL'rm. "ambit'nt" as 0pposl'd 10 "ltm
level". 2) that pl.'rchloratc is an t'mlocrilH' disruptor. whl'J1 therc is no clear evieknee to that dln'l,
and 3) tht, usc of the term contamination. instead of t'xposure is pejoralive. I perchlorate pose
exposure poses a hazard to the American public, and to inform and involve stakeholders
about research developments in this area. The Administration is committed to
developing health risk assessments that are objective. realistic. and scientifically sound
balanced. to serve as the basis of credible and basing risk management decisions Ofl
this scientific foundation. I Suggest WI.' presene langu~l~c taken from the September 2001
OMB guidance on regulatory re\'ic\\. that requires "scientifically balanced' and "hasing I'isk
manaOemt'nt
~
decisions on thcsl.' obJ' cctive. realistic. and scientificalh
. '
balanced" asseSS11It'nts·1
(DIRA: This paragraph leads the reader to believe that most ofthe 29$ miJJioll is
spent on humall health research. where infact 25$ miJJion goes to treatment
technology development, thus it needs to be reworked. Suggested edits are: The
Department has been tlt the feTe/Unit ojactively involved in research into the potential
limited extent. whether the extent to ~';Hieh there may be subpopulations of special
vulnerability (EPA: DoD asked that the studies addressing special vulnerabilit)' be
thrown out. e.g.• the developmental neurotoxicity studies). DoD has invested over
$29 million to develop innovative treatment technologies and helped HJ- better
perchlorate. Rnd to de~el-ep inno~alive tretltlflenttechn6f.8gies (EPA: the majority of
this cost is for treatment technology used for recovery and not for ""low" level
operations.). The DeptlTlHlenl htls Ifltlde tl sigr-lijiCtlnt iHl~estmelft in pe1'Chf.6"Rte
~ .
relflted Tesetlrch. In doing this. DoD worked closelv with EPA to establish the research
agenda and study protocols. D6D scientists have themselves C6HRUe1eR mtlllJ'
indepemlem studies to Rssess the pote:ltiBI risks and effects tJ-jpe1'ChhJTtlte eXp6SH1'C.
IAgree in part; we will re\'ise the first sentcJlCt' to read "The Dep~lrtmt'nt has spent sOllie S~ million
on research into the rotcntilll health effect" of pcrchlonlte. the conditions under which thest' risk.,;
might arise. and the extent to \\ hich there m.. ~ be suhpopllilltions of special ,·ulnel'abilit~." "',,
doin~ this. DoD worked c1oscl~ with EP.-\ to I.'stahlish tht' rt'seal'ch agenda amI stud~· pl'otol'ols,"
(add tht, following from the next paragraph "As a result of thilo dost, cooperation and DoD's
proacti,t, participation. the science nel'ded to char-actcl'izt, thl' ro(ential I'isk associated wit h !em
le\'cls of pen'hlOl'ate exposure "as gener:ltt'd in an accelt'nlted manner." "DoD h~I'" also jll\'l'sted
over S:!5 million to dcn'lop inno\'llthe trcatmt'nl tt,t'hnologit,s I'm' pen'hlomtc, il'l'especti,·e of
whether tht, chemical posl'd II risk. •• ,
(DIRA: This paragraph is not lIecessary. Percltlorate is not on the IRIS
database tit us comparing a draft assessment to this database is irrevelant. Suggest
deleting it aU.) IOkll~·] As a result of this close cooperation and DoD's proactive
participation. the science needed to characterize the potential risk .fF6m associated with
lew- ambient levels of perchlorate exposure was generated in an accelerated manner,
The resulting perchlorate database is more robust than many in EPA's Integrated Risk
Information System (lRlS). as evidenced by estimations of overall confidence. size of
uncertainty factor. and types of available data. Particularly helpful is the availabilir;. of
the developmental neurotoxicity studies which assess the key endpoints of concern
and human pharmacokinetic data that allowed the AFRL to develop interspecie~
extrapolation models. human elinieal trial data whieh permit the deriYatioB of Stlfe
exposure levels without ha~ting to rely on highly uneertain and eonser'lath'e
extrapolations from animals, in this ease rats. ( EPA:-Disagree. The extrapolations
were far from "highly uncertain' and "consentative' because: (1) The human and
lab animal data give the same estimates (2) the human data tell us nothing ~lbout
susceptible populations (3) rats are not sensitive for neurotoxic effects, in fact, they
may be insensitive (4) these are not clinical trials designed to give pharmacokinetic
information for modeling puposes and (5) the RID estimate is not an estimate of a
'"safe exposure level.") IEPA'~ point!- an' true onl~ if~"ou manipulate th(' uDl;l'rtaint~ fal'tur~.
This is the hl'art of our disputl:. \\e don't hdievc thl' extrapolation models an' appropriate.
EPA's changed text ske"" the fUl,ts, suggl'sting that tl\(' human data was onl~' intended to populatl'
the animal model. We'\C not heen persua<kd this point is true at all.1
(DoE: ... [This paragraph is]
r
DoD scientists ha....e genuine and well-faunded tlisagFeements with some 9fthe
i~fereHces Bud conclusions in EPA's J·a}fUa'J' 20(}2 drajtperellHJHlte hea/III
assessment document, which contains preliminary risk estimates that cou.vJ he used to
es1flhlish an official Reference Dose (RfD), IThis is an important point for DoD: It has bl'('n
n'portl'd in the prl'ss, that thl' onl~ thing DoD can's about is the mOlle~' it willl~ost to c1l'anup thesl'
sites. This just isn't the case. We will chanl!l' till' sentence instead as follows: "000 and scientists
ha\(' significant disagn'l'ml'uts wilh some of the inf('n'nces and conl'lusions in EP:\'s J~lDuar~ 200:!
draft perchloratl· health aSSl'ssmcnt document. which c(lntains prcliminal'~' risl.. estimatl's that
l'ould hl' uSl'd to ('stahlish an official I~rfl' ..el\l·l· 1)0"(' (Rfl». Lnclosed. please find a copy of the
testimony that the Department presented to the California State Senate concerning
perchlorate research on this lJuestiOlf. IO~I~'l The Department continues to work with
EPA and other stakeholders to develop scientifically-defensible decisions regarding
perchlorate use. assessment. and cleanup.
With the full support of DoD, NASA. and the Department of Energy. EPA hifS heen
working to re....ise tile 20(}2 drRft health assessment, and I oka~'1 has decided to submit the
resolve several underlying scientific questions (DIRA Incorporates DoE comment.)

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 I

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

CREW: Department of Defense: Department of The Air Force: Regarding Perchlorate: Scanned Perchlorate October 2008 I

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Regulatory

Service I Facility , Site j

IE3CX;~~ (otential pathway under residential

Potential pathway under residential

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Researctl, Development. Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Potential pathway under residential

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Researctl. Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwater1 Research, Development, Testand

Potential pathway under residential

Navy I IVVhite Oak Surface

Navy I VVhite Oak Surface 46Groundwaterl Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy I 'I~ite Oak Surface

Service I Facility I Site I

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface

Navy! VIAllte Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, DeVelopment, Test and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research. Development, Tesl and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! VIAlite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! sl~ite Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Developmenl, Tesl and

File; PercData_A1ISvcs_April 2217_

Service I Facility I Site I

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy! While Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Potential pathway under residential

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Groundwater2 Research, Development, Test and

Navy ! White Oak Surface Research, Development. Test and

Navy! White Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Navy! V\l1ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Navy! V\l1ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Navy! V\l1ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Service I Facility I Site I

Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Tes1 and

Marine Corps Warfare Center Water205 Evaluation

Navy! V\11ite Oak Surface 46Surface Research, Development, Test and

Marine Corps warfare Center Water207 Evaluation

Army Perchlorate Survey - EnvIronmental Restoration - Cleanup. Other

File; PercData_NISvcs_April 2217_

Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Surrflower Army Surface RCRA Correclive

Surrflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective

Sunflower Army Surface RCRA Corrective