DE LA SALLE SANTIAGO ZOBEL SCHOOL

ENGLISH Y3 PERFORMANCE TASK RUBRIC

Criteria
1. Oral Defense

2. Conclusion

3. Structure

4. APA Citation
5. Shared Task
(In this criterion, please write
your name and your partners
name, then grade yourself and
your partner based on the
given standards. Be honest!)
Researcher 1:
Researcher 2:
Researcher 3:

TOTAL : 20 points

Exceeds Standard
(4)

Meets Standard
(3)

Near Standard
(2)

Below Standard
(1)

The researchers displayed expertise

through an exceptional presentation
resources that helped the audience
understand the topic, and gave a
detailed and a well-explained points of
the topic within the given time limit.
Thus, they answered questions clearly
and accurately with excellence.
The research paper included concise
summary and excellent findings that
led to a well-explained
recommendations.
The research paper followed correct
APA style in all areas. Hence, all parts
of the discussion had branched up
logically from the thesis statement
underscoring the findings and
recommendations.
All sources were documented
following the correct APA format.
The researcher displayed excellence
and enthusiasm in accomplishing all
the tasks given to him/her.

The researchers showed a wellprepared presentation through an

adequate presentation resources that
helped the audience understand the
topic, and gave a detailed and wellexplained points of the topic within the
given time limit. Thus, they answered
questions clearly and accurately.
The research paper presented a
summary and research findings that led
to an adequate recommendations.

The researchers presented the topic

through a presentation resource with
some inadequate details, mostly
reading the content to explain the
topic well-enough. Thus, they
answered questions with hesitations
that showed little expertise of the
given topic.
The research paper showed
incomplete summary and inadequate
findings with imprecise
recommendations.
The research paper followed APA
style with errors to 2-3 areas. Hence,
some parts of the discussion had
branched up from the thesis statement
in line with the findings and
recommendations.
Sources were documented with an
incorrect format on most of the areas.
The researcher accomplished some of
the tasks given to him/her.

The researchers basically read what

was written on the poorly
constructed presentation resource,
and showed inanity of the topic
given. Thus, none of the questions
were answered well.

The research paper followed APA style

with an error to one area. Hence, the
discussion had branched up from the
thesis statement featuring the findings
and recommendations.
Sources were mostly documented
following the APA format.
The researcher accomplished all the
tasks given to him/her.

The research paper contained vague

summary and unclear findings with
poor recommendations
The research paper failed to follow
APA style. Hence, all parts of the
discussion deviated from the thesis
statement and were not in line with
the findings and recommendations.
Sources were documented
incorrectly.
The researcher did not accomplish
any task given to him/her.