Professional Documents
Culture Documents
DISCLAIMER
Any statement, opinion, prediction, comment, or observation made in this
presentation/publication are those of the presenter/author only and in no condition
should be construed necessarily representing the policy and intent of Reliance
Industries Ltd. (RIL).
The information presented herein are of the presenter/authors own and in no way
RIL attracts any liability for any inconsistency or irregularity in terms of the accuracy
completeness, veracity, or truth of the content of the presentation/publication. In
addition, RIL shall not be liable for any copyright infringement and
misrepresentation for the presented content as the content is presumed in good
faith to be a creation of presenters/authors own mind.
The scope of this presentation/publication is strictly for knowledge sharing
purposes and not necessarily to provide any advice or recommendation to the
audience/readers. Any endorsement, recommendation, suggestion, or advice made
by the presenter/author shall be in his personal capacity and not in professional
capacity as an employee of RIL. Any person acting on such endorsement,
recommendation, suggestion, or advice will himself/herself be responsible for any
injury/damage.
Reliance Industries Ltd., 2016
RELIANCE PERFORMANCE
Performance;
(For Year 2014-15)
$ bn
Revenue/turnover
62.2
Exports in refining
product
32.5
EBDIT
6.3
Cash profit
5.1
Net profit
3.8
Segment performance
Refining
Petrochem
Others
Revenues
11,534
339,890
96,804
5,507
EBDIT
3,181
15,827
8,291
1,250
in Rs (Crore)
GROWTH PLANS
Jamnagar
Ethylene
MEG
Dahej
PTA
(Figures in 000 tonnes per
annum)
PET
(Figures in 000 tonnes per
annum)
PE
(Figures in 000 tonnes per
annum)
Hazira
Silvassa
PBR/SBR
PFY/PTY
PX
INTRODUCTION
PROBLEMS:
1. VADODARA MANUFACTURING DIVISION,
BUTADIENE PLANT DEGASSER PERFORANCE
REDUCTION ISSUE.
2. PATALGANGA MANUFACTURING DIVISION,
LAB PLANT, PARAFFIN COLUMN
PERFORMANCE REDUCTION ISSUE.
Afte r Washer
RUP
M ain Washer
RLP
C- 24
13-503
V A to
Flare
Degasser
C-22
13-502
13-504
13-505
C4R
M X-C4
Fe ed
Propyne
Column
C- 41
P 33
Degasser fee d
flash drum
C- 45
V-22
K.O. Drum
CC-31
Compressor
V-31
1:3
BD
CIS
Final Column
PROBLEM 1:
Introduction:
The Degasser column of Butadiene Plant in VMD is a packed column with six
beds.
It is required to maintain solvent quality.
By Design all the Beds had same packing.
In April shutdown some packing were changed.
After start-up column performance deteriorated.
Temperature profile changed and PDI increased
PROBLEM 1:
Trouble-shooting using Aspen Plus: Given to the seriousness of purpose a team
started working towards the issue.
Aspen Plus simulations were done both in Equilibrium and in Rate-based models for
the design case.
In the Equilibrium case, the column was modelled as a tray column and Murphree
efficiency was tuned
As this column is an absorber, to have a more realistic approach we did the
simulation in Rate-Based mode and Interfacial Area factor, Mass transfer coefficient
factor and heat transfer coefficient factor were tuned.
However both the models gave very similar results.
PROBLEM 1:
Trouble-shooting using Aspen Plus: contd..
The same tuned models were used to evaluate the disturbed case.
PROBLEM 1: INFERENCE
PROBLEM 2:
Introduction:
Paraffin Column is Heart of any Linear Alkyl benzene (LAB) Plant.
It is a packed column operating under vacuum.
The Top product is recycle paraffin & the Bottom product of this Column
is the Final LAB Product of Plant.
After May15 turnaround of LAB Plant, when Plant was started, both the
Top and Bottom Products of this Column were observed out of
specification limits.
No activity was carried out in this Column during the turnaround.
Operation team adjusted reflux, reboiler duty etc but specs could not be
15
met.
Reliance Industries Ltd., 2016
PROBLEM 2:
Trouble-shooting using Aspen Plus:
a. A simulation model of the column was available, tested for design case
and stable operation case.
b. A dedicated team went to site for quick access of operating data.
c. The validated model was used to match the disturbed scenario, tuning
Murphree Efficiency.
d. An incredible reduction of efficiency indicated that some unprecedented
problem had occurred inside the column.
e. Shutdown was taken the following day largely on the basis of simulation
results to inspect the column internals.
f. Certain internals showed deviation from design.
g. These issues were rectified.
h. After start-up column performance was restored.
Reliance Industries Ltd., 2016
16
PROBLEM 2: INFERENCE
THANK YOU
Reliance Industries Ltd., 2016
19