Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O
A B S T R A C T
Article history:
Received 24 May 2014
Received in revised form 31 July 2014
Accepted 10 September 2014
Keywords:
Anionic surfactants
Coagulationocculation
Ultraviolet photolysis
Response surface methodology
Laundry wastewater
Introduction
Surfactants used as surface-active matters can effectively
decrease the surface tension of liquids. Those surface activities
of surfactants derive from the amphiphilic structures that posses
both hydrophilic and hydrophobic parts in one molecule [1].
Synthetic surfactants are widely used in many industrial
applications such as metal processing, textile, food, pharmaceuticals and paper industries [2]. Surfactants are can be
classied into four groups depending on the charge of the
hydrophilic part: nonionic (0), anionic (), cationic (+) and
zwitterionic () [3].
Linar alkylbenzene sulfonate (LAS) is a typical anionic surfactant, which are extensively used in household products, detergents,
personal care products, industrial processes and pesticide formulations [4,5]. It can also be found in the sewages of many enterprises
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 411 84706172; fax: +86 411 84706328.
E-mail address: guoquanz@126.com (G. Zhang).
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.09.011
2213-3437/ 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
2112
Table 1
Chemical components of the mineral ash.
Component
SiO2
Al2O3
Fe2O3
MgO
CaO
SO3
TiO2
MnO
K2O
Na2O
Content (wt%)
50.64
37.57
5.15
0.80
1.72
0.30
1.15
0.068
0.67
0.44
Experimental procedures
Coagulationocculation experiments
Coagulationocculation experiments were carried out in a
classical jar test apparatus. ZnCl2, mineral ash and P-650 were
added successively into 400 mL wastewater. Then, the wastewater
was vigorously mixed for 5 min at 200 rpm, followed by slow
mixing for 30 min at 30 rpm, and allowed to settle for 30 min.
Finally, the supernatant was taken out for measurement and
subsequent ultraviolet photolysis. After the optimization of three
components dosages through RSM, three parallel coagulation
occulation/ultraviolet photolysis experiments were carried out
with the actual laundry wastewater obtained from the launderette
in Dalian University of Technology, China. The initial composition
of the laundry wastewater is shown in Table 2.
Response surface methodology
The dosages of ZnCl2, ash and Praestol-650 were optimized by
the RSM in order to obtain the maximal removal efciency of AS. A
BoxBehnken design [21] was chosen to evaluate the combined
effect of three independent variables. The contents of ZnCl2, ash
and Praestol-650 were termed as X1,X2 and X3, respectively. The
minimum and maximum ranges of variables were investigated and
the full experimental plan with respect to their values is listed in
Table 2. The coded values of the three independent variables
together with the responses are shown in Table 3. An empirical
second-order polynomial model for three factors was in the
following form:
Y i b0
n
X
i1
bi X i
n
X
bii X 2i
i1
n
X
bij X i X j e
(1)
i<1
Photolysis experiments
Ultraviolet photolysis experiments were carried out using a high
pressure mercury lamp (quartz tube, power supply 220 V/36 W,
frequency = 50 Hz, l = 253.7 nm) as the light source at room
temperature. The distance between the lamp and wastewater
was 5 cm. The volume of wastewater was 200 mL, the width of the
wastewater layer was 3 cm and the irradiation time was 30 min.
Table 2
The initial composition of the laundry wastewater.
Laundry wastewater ingredients
Concentration (mg/L)
LAS
Suspension substances/optical density
Oil products (oil P)
Chemical oxygen demand (COD)
pH
19.68
126.6/0.76
3.70
280
9.09.5
Coded
ZnCl2 (mg/L)
Ash (mg/L)
Praestol-650 (mg/L)
X1
X2
X3
2113
Table 4
The design of RSM and its actual and predicted values.
Levels
1
4
0
30
17
1000
115
30
2000
200
Analytical determinations
The determination of LAS was conducted by the liquid
uorescent spectrophotometry method (RF 5301 PC, Shimadzu).
The excitation wavelength is 261 nm and the emission wavelength
is 315 nm. Firstly, LAS ions with the uorescent stain (acridine
yellow) were extracted from sample using chloroform, and then
the concentration of LAS was measured according to the
uorescence intensity of the extract. The zeta potential value of
the complex aggregate was measured by MALVERN ZETASIZER
(3000HS, UK). The suspension substances in actual laundry
wastewater was measured by the gravimetric method, where
the wastewater sample rstly passed through 0.45 mm lter
membrane and then dried to constant weight at 103105 C. The
optical density and COD of the actual laundry wastewater were
determined by LS117 (Linshang Technology Ltd., China) and
microwave digestion method. The oil products in wastewater
was also measured by the gravimetric method, where the water
sample was rstly acidized by sulfuric acid, then it was extracted
by petroleum ether, and nally weighting the extractants after the
petroleum ether was evaporated. an p=-meter HANNA 213 was
used to determinate the solution p=. The presence of ketones
(acetones), alcohols, fatty acid (E2E10) and (E8E22) was
determined by the gas chromatography (GC, HP 5890). The
detector was the ame ionization detector (FID), and the carrier
gas was nitrogen. The substances concentrations were determined
according to the chromatographic peak height as compared with
the standard peak.
Results and discussion
Optimization of coagulationocculation experiments
LAS are present as both micelle and ion-molecular states in
actual wastewater [2]. Taking into consideration the fact that the
colloid particles of LAS is negatively charged, thus Praestol650 which contains the positively charged ions (Fig. 1), was chosen
as the cationic occulants due to the occurrence of ion-ion
interaction. The partial hydrolyzations of the coagulant components can efcient adsorb the charged particles either in colloid
state or dissolved in water environment. Therefore, the industrial
mineral ash from the thermoelectrical plant was used as a solid
coagulant. On the other hand, in order to reduce the occulants
Number
X1
X2
X3
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
17
4
30
17
30
17
30
17
4
4
17
30
17
17
4
17
17
1000
2000
2000
0
1000
2000
0
2000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
1000
0
1000
0
115
115
115
200
30
200
115
30
30
200
115
200
115
115
115
115
30
R (%)
Experimental
Predicated
48.53
36.94
60.75
65.57
44.65
62.97
55.26
34.87
23.02
56.34
48.53
69.6
48.53
48.53
42.93
48.53
33.86
48.53
36.96
60.46
65.24
44.61
62.91
55.24
35.2
22.67
56.38
48.53
69.95
48.53
48.53
43.22
48.53
33.92
(2)
Table 5
Analysis of variance table.
Source
Sum of
squares
Model
X1-ZnCl2
X2-ash
X3 -P650
X1X2
X1X3
X2X3
X12
X22
X3 2
Residual
Lack of
t
Pure
error
2429.97
630.66
0.55
1742.86
Cor total
df
Mean
square
9 270.00
1 630.66
1
0.55
1 1742.86
32.95
17.51
3.26
0.24
1.93
0.05
0.64
0.64
1
1
1
1
1
1
7
3
32.95
17.51
3.26
0.24
1.93
0.05
0.09
0.21
0.00
0.00
2430.61
16
F value
2951.81 <0.0001
6894.86 <0.0001
5.97
0.0445
19,054.35 <0.0001
360.21 <0.0001
191.48 <0.0001
35.62
0.0006
2.60
0.1511
21.13
0.0025
0.56
0.4798
2114
Fig. 2. The effects of ZnCl2 and ash (P-650 = 115 mg/L) on LAS removal efciency: (a) surface graphs and (b) contour plots.
2115
Fig. 3. The effects of ZnCl2 and P-650 (ash = 1000 mg/L) on LAS removal efciency: (a) surface graphs and (b) contour plots.
SO3Na
SO3
Zn
2+
Zn
+ 2Na+
(3)
2116
Fig. 4. Surface graphs of the effects of ash and P-650 (ZnCl2 = 17 mg/L) on LAS removal efciency: (a) surface graphs and (b) contour plots.
Table 6
The average removal efciencies of LAS, COD and suspension in the three replicate coagulationocculation experiments. Conditions: pH 9.0, the dosages of ZnCl2, ash and
P-650 was 29.54, 1936.35 and 196.38 mg/L, respectively.
No. test
LAS
Residual concentration (mg/L)
1
2
3
Mean result
3.56a , 5.12b
4.05a , 4.83b
4.29a , 5.06b
74.21a , 73.98b
70.68a , 75.46b
68.90a , 74.29b
71.26a , 74.58b
89
82
80
68.21
70.71
71.43
70.12
51.4
54.8
52.6
57.16
54.33
56.17
55.89
a
b
COD
Suspensions
2117
Fig. 5. (a) Stabilization of emulsion and suspension in presence of LAS; (b) the
coagulation scheme of colloid particles by Zn(OH)+ ions.
Fig. 7. (a) The formation scheme of the intermediate aggregates after the
adsorption of contaminants on ash particles; (b) the macro-aggregates in
wastewater in the presence of Praestol-650 occulant.
2118
Table 7
Results of gas chromatography.
Parameters (mg/L)
Ketones (acetones)
Alcohols
Methyl
Ethyl
Isopropyl
0.162
0.244
0.55
0.0984
0.135
0.0198
0.174
0.099
0.25
[29,30]
0.0367
0.127
0.0377
0.126
0.55
0.55
0.55
1.0
[30]
0.00494
0.049
0.315
0.034
0.24
0.138
1.0
1.0
1.0
[30]
Conclusions
In this study, a combined chemical coagulationocculation/
photolysis process was proved to be a suitable treatment strategy
for dealing with LAS in laundry wastewater. Mineral ash, ZnCl2,
and P-650 were chosen as coagulant-sorbent, complex former
and cationic high molecular occulants, respectively, in the
coagulationocculation process. Their dosages were optimized
by RSM. Under the condition of the optimal parameters of
ZnCl2 = 29.54 mg/L; ash = 1936.35 mg/L and P-650 = 196.38 mg/L,
71.26% and 74.58% of LAS were removed from the self-made LAS
wastewater and the actual laundry wastewater, respectively. The
coagulationocculation process was consistent with the destabilization and the extraction of LAS by the high-molecular
occulants through the combined mechanisms of charge
neutralization and bridging. The alkaline environment is benecial to LAS photolysis removal. Results indicated that the
combined chemical coagulationocculation/ultraviolet photolysis process is an environmentally friendly strategy for laundry
wastewater treatment due to its efcient and rapid treatment rate
and novel charge neutralization/extraction mechanism.
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge the nancial support from the National
Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 21177017) and the
Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.
DUT13LK50).
References
[1] C.A. Basar, A. Karagunduz, A. Cakici, B. Keskinler, Removal of surfactants
by powdered activated carbon and microltration, Water Res. 38 (2004)
21172124, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.001. 15087193.
[2] Y. Kaya, C. Aydiner, H. Barlas, B. Keskinler, Nanoltration of single and mixture
solutions containing anionics and nonionic surfactants below their critical
micelle concentrations (CMCs), J. Membr. Sci. 282 (2006) 401412, doi:http://
dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.memsci.2006.05.047.
[3] G.G. Ying, Fate, behavior and effects of surfactants and their degradation
products in the environment, Environ. Int. 32 (2006) 417431, doi:http://dx.
doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2005.07.004. 16125241.
[4] I. Ciabattia, F. Cesaro, L. Faralli, E. Fatarella, F. Tognotti, Demonstration of
a treatment system for purication and reuse of laundry wastewater,
Desalination
245
(2009)
451459,
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
desal.2009.02.008.
[5] I. Kowalska, M.K. Korbutowicz, K.M. Nowak, T. Winnicki, Separation of anionic
surfactants on ultraltration membranes, Desalination 162 (2004) 3340, doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0011-9164(04)00024-4.
[6] G.S. Fomin, Water: Control of Chemical, Bacterial and Radiation Safety to
International Standards (An Encyclopedic Reference), Goskomstandart,
Moscow, 2000, pp. 750.
Standard
[7] A.K. Mungray, P. Kumar, Mass balance of anionic surfactants through upow anaerobic sludge blanket based sewage treatment plants, Process
Saf. Environ. Prot. 87 (2009) 254260, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
psep.2009.03.004.
[8] J.K. Braga, M.B.A. Varesche, Commercial laundry water characterization for
anaerobic treatment in uidized bed reactor, X Ocina e Seminrio Latino
Americano de Digesto Anaerbia (DAAL), Ouro Preto, MG, 2011.
[9] T. Cserhti, E. Forgcs, G. Oros, Biological activity and environmental impact of
anionic surfactants, Environ. Int. 28 (2002) 337348, doi:http://dx.doi.org/
10.1016/S0160-4120(02)00032-6. 12437283.
[10] S. ostar-Turk, I. Petrini
c, M. Simoni9
c, Laundry wastewater treatment using
coagulation and membrane ltration, Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 44 (2005)
185196, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.11.002.
[11] M. Rosu, A. Marlina, A. Kaya, A. Schumpe, Surfactant adsorption onto activated
carbon and its effect on absorption with chemical reaction, Chem. Eng. Sci. 62
(2007) 73367343, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2007.08.027.
[12] A.H. Mahvi, A. Maleki, B. Roshani, Removal of anionic surfactants in detergent
wastewater by chemical coagulation, Pakistan J. Biol. Sci. 7 (2004) 22222226,
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3923/pjbs.2004.2222.2226.
[13] W. Kong, B. Wang, H. Ma, L. Gu, Electrochemical treatment of anionic
surfactants in synthetic wastewater with three-dimensional electrodes, J.
Hazard. Mater. 137 (2006) 15321537, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.04.037. 16730897.
[14] Y.Y. Eng, V.K. Sharma, A.K. Ray, Photocatalytic degradation of nonionic surfactant,
Brij 35 in aqueous TiO2 suspensions, Chemosphere 79 (2010) 205209, doi:
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.01.042. 20171712.
[15] I. Kowalska, Surfactant removal from water solutions by means of ultraltration and ion-exchange, Desalination 221 (2008) 351357, doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.01.094.
[16] F. Aloui, S. Kchaou, S. Sayadi, Physicochemical treatments of anionic
surfactants wastewater: effect on aerobic biodegradability, J. Hazard. Mater.
164 (2009) 353359, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2008.08.009.
18799262.
[17] D. Prats, F. Ruiz, B. Vazquez, M. Rodriguez-Pastor, Removal of anionic and nonionic surfactants in a wastewater treatment plant with anaerobic digestion. A
comparative study, Water Res. 8 (1997) 19251930.
[18] J. Kaleta, M. Elektorowicz, The removal of anionic surfactants from water in
coagulation process, Environ. Technol. 34 (2013) 9991005, doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1080/09593330.2012.733415. 23837351.
[19] T. Chatterjee, S. Chatterjee, D.S. Lee, M.W. Lee, S.H. Woo, Coagulation of soil
suspensions containing nonionic or anionic surfactants using chitosan,
polyacrylamide, and polyaluminium chloride, Chemosphere 75 (2009)
13071314,
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2009.03.012.
19345394.
[20] A.M. Amat, A. Arques, M.A. Miranda, S. Segu, Photo-Fenton reaction for the
abatement of commercial surfactants in a solar pilot plant, Solar Energy 77
(2004) 559566, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2004.03.028.
[21] A.M. Amat, A. Arques, M.A. Miranda, R. Vincente, S. Segu, Degradation of two
commercial anionic surfactants by means of ozone and/or UV irradiation,
Environ. Eng. Sci. 24 (2007) 790794, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/
ees.2006.0030.
[22] T.P. Delforno, A.G.L. Moura, D.Y. Okada, M.B.A. Varesche, Effect of biomass
adaptation to the degradation of anionic surfactants in laundry wastewater
using EGSB reactors, Bioresour. Technol. 154 (2014) 114121, doi:http://dx.doi.
org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.102. 24384318.
[23] C.A. Basar, A. Karagunduz, A. Cakici, B. Keskinler, Removal of surfactants by
powdered activated carbon and microltration, Water Res. 38 (2004) 21172124,
doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2004.02.001. 15087193.
[24] G.E.P. Box, D.W. Behnken, Some new three level designs for the study of
quantitative variables, Technometrics 2 (1960) 455475, doi:http://dx.doi.org/
10.1080/00401706.1960.10489912.
2119
[29] K.E. Lee, N. Morad, T.T. Teng, B.T. Poh, Development, characterization and the
application of hybrid materials in coagulation/occulation of wastewater: a
review, Chem. Eng. J. 203 (2012) 370386, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.
cej.2012.06.109.
[30] Discharge standard of pollutants for municipal wastewater treatment plant,
the national standard of the Peoples Republic of China, GB 189182002.
[31] Environmental quality standards for surface water, the national standard of
the Peoples Republic of China, GB 38382002.
[32] World Health Organization Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality third
edition. Vol. 1, 2004, Geneva.
[33] EUs Drinking Water Standards. Council Directive 98/83/EC on the quality of
water intended for human consumption. Adopted by the Council, on
3 November 1998.