Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Vol16 Iss02
2300
2250
2200
2150
2100
2050
2000
1950
$1156.35
$1085.40
$1150.35
1900
High
Low
Last
200D M.A.
DJIA
16516.22 15766.74 16204.97 17338.84
DJUA 626.64 578.66 624.62 576.26
NASDAQ 4685.92 4363.14 4363.14 4937.90
S&P 500 1940.24 1859.33 1880.05 2040.81
1850
1800
1750
1700
1650
1600
AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN FEB MAR APR MAY JUN JUL AUG SEP OCT NOV DEC JAN
2014
2015
Current: 20.7
88 yr Avg: 17.0
AL
I
EC
SP
If it Looks like one Walks like one and Growls like one
(Technically A Confirmed Bear Market)
For more than 12 months, as technical warning flags have increased, we have been steering a more defensive course in
both our strategy and portfolio allocation. In hindsight, our only regret was not fighting the bullish headwinds more
decisively. But the sirens of Wall Street have been compellingly convincing, even to the seasoned investor:
MarketWatch 12/2/15
MarketWatch 12/4/15
Bloomberg 12/12/15
Barrons 12/22/15
150
120
Total Days
Day-to-Day Volatility
DJIA
90
60
30
0
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
00
05
10
15
InvesTech Research
Yet at the same time that technical evidence of a bear market seems overwhelming, most leading economic indicators
are resilient in not forecasting any recession on the horizon. So either this is a market-induced decline (or bear market)
that might not have too many more months to run, or we should soon start seeing confirming negative signals on the
macroeconomic side that Main Street is heading for trouble too. Inside, we tell you where to watch
EDITOR: JAMES B. STACK
Extended bull markets always create excesses. And those excesses can take many forms in valuation, speculation,
margin debt, and simply investor complacency. Historically, 5-10% corrections are a healthy part of every bull market.
And the longer a bull market runs without a significant correction of 10% or more, the more likely the end result will be
a [sizable] bear market.
2009
2002
1990
1987
1982
1974
1970
1966
1962
1957
1949
1947
1942
1938
1935
1932
84 mo.
55 mo.
44 mo.
40 mo.
37 mo.
Average = 3.8yrs
Median = 3.6yrs
10yrs
InvesTech Research
6.7yrs*
2009
2001
1991
1982
1980
1975
1970
1961
1958
1954
1949
1945
1938
1933
1927
1924
1921
1919
1914
1912
1908
1904
Average = 3.8yrs
Median = 3.1yrs
InvesTech Research
10yrs
*through 2/12/16
After more than 6 years of seemingly continuous rising stock prices, the R word was rarely mentioned in any discussions
or forecasts from economists and Wall Street analysts last year. But what a difference a volatile month of declining stock
prices can make:
Last Oct
Citigroup urges investors to be brave as it forecasts
a 20% gain in global equities by end-2016
Today
Citi: World economy trapped in death spiral
CNBC 2/5/16
Over the next few pages, we explore the dichotomy between leading technical and economic indicators, and lay out our
strategy for navigating the current Wall Street conundrum
Its been 26 years since we developed our Negative Leadership Composite (NLC) to help identify the best buying
opportunities, as well as the highest risk markets. Its pure common sense that broad upside leadership (and absence of
downside or negative leadership) signifies or confirms a new bull market. It usually does the same for second or third
bull market legs. This is shown when a bullish SELLING VACUUM [*1] appears in the NLC. Conversely, broad and
increasing downside leadership shown by DISTRIBUTION [shaded region *2] will always confirm high risk early in
a bear market by dropping to -100.
Our challenge, at times like this, is distinguishing whether DISTRIBUTION might be caused by temporary factors,
which was the case three times in the current bull market the Congressional showdown over the debt limit, the
markets Fed taper tantrum, and the oil price collapse over a year ago. Judging by the depth, duration, and
broadening sector contribution to the DISTRIBUTION in leadership, we must conclude that Wall Street is currently
in a bear market.
S&P 500
2000
[2 DISTRIBUTION
[-BEARISH-]: This
signals that investors
are anxious to sell
stocks regardless of
whether their position
is at a loss, or the stock
market is tumbling to
new lows. It carries
bearish implications
as it suggests investors
will use any rallies to
get out of the market.
1500
1000
800
600
400
Bull Market
"launching pads"
[1 SELLING VACUUM
[-BULLISH-]: This
confirms the absence
of negative or
downside leadership.
It is normally a very
bullish signal since
a stock market
without any downside
leadership is destined
to move much higher.
300
200
100
70
50
Log Scale
67
69
71
73
75
77
81
83
85
87
89
95
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
Apr
2015
Margin Debt
11
13
15
1SELLING VACUUM
(very bullish)
InvesTech Research
-100
(% Nominal GDP)
2.8%
2.4%
Next Release
~Feb 24
2.0%
1.6%
1.2%
0.8%
0.4%
67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
Source: Ned Davis Research
S&P 500
2200
Market
Peak
Market
Peak
Market
Peak
1500
1000
600
Market
Peak
400
300
200
93
false
signal
0
-50
-100
0.0%
91
false
signal
80
60
40
20
0
79
Market Market
Peak Peak
Market
Peak
100
70
50
Log Scale
67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
3 /InvesTech
Research
February 12, 2016
Two (almost three) major U.S. indexes already qualify as bear markets
Investors might be surprised to learn that most
foreign stock markets including Londons FTSE
(Financial Times Stock Exchange) Index, the
German DAX, and Tokyo Nikkei are all off
more than 20% from last years highs. Chinas
Shanghai Composite has tumbled 46% from its
peak last June.
-13.1%
1400
1200
1000
800
600
500
400
S&P 500
2200
1800
Log Scale
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
NASDAQ
6000
5000
-17.9%
4000
3000
2500
2000
1500
1200
1000
Log Scale
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
DJTA
11000
9000
-24.2%
7000
5000
4000
3000
2500
2000
1500
Log Scale
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Russell 2000
1300
1000
-25.6%
800
600
500
400
300
200
Log Scale
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
Advance-Decline Line
+400K
+360K
+320K
+280K
+240K
+200K
+160K
+120K
+80K
+40K
0
-40K
3500
2500
1500
1000
700
500
Market
Peak
Market Market
Peak
Peak
Market
Peak
Market
Peak
S&P 500
300
200
100
60
Log Scale
87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
The Coppock Guide, which has been weakening for almost 2 years, is now confirming a bear market. Thats bad news for
the market in the near-term, but has positive implications down the road. This important indicator was developed more
than 50 years ago by Edwin S. Coppock and has often been described as a barometer of the markets emotional state. As
such, it methodically tracks the ebb and flow of equity markets, moving slowly from one emotional extreme to the other.
By calculation, the Coppock Guide is the 10-month weighted moving total of a 14-month rate of change plus an 11-month
rate of change of a market index. While that sounds complicated, its actually an oscillator that reverses direction when
long-term momentum in the market peaks in one direction or the other.
Historically, the value of the Coppock Guide lies in signaling or confirming low risk buying opportunities that emerge
once a bear market bottom is in place (black dotted lines on the graph below). And since market bottoms are typically
sudden V-shaped reversals, it works amazingly well as it did shortly after the bottom in 2009.
Coppock Guide
-Double Tops+60
+40
+20
-0.7
-20
false
signal
-40
20
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
1000
600
400
200
100
60
40
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
00
05
10
15
S&P 500
2000
false
signal
1-8
NOTE: Double Tops have preceded 1929, 1969, 1973, 2000,
and 2007 - five of the biggest bear markets this century.
20
8
4
NOTE: S&P 500 estimated prior to 1928 by correlation with a similar index.
Log Scale
20
25
30
InvesTech Research
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
85
90
95
00
05
10
15
Unfortunately, the Coppock Guide is generally not as useful in identifying market peaks. One reason is that bull market
tops are usually slow, rounding formations in which momentum and the Coppock Guide peak up to a year or more
ahead of the market. Yet there are certain instances when it has proven invaluable at a market top
In the late 1960s a technician named Don Hahn observed another phenomenon about the Coppock Guide. When a
double top occurs without the graph falling to 0 a phenomenon that Hahn referred to as a Killer Wave it confirms
an extended bull market where psychological excesses can reach extremes. In those situations, the appearance of a second
peak generally means a bear market has just begun or is not far off (see red dashed lines). The late 1990s was an exception.
Killer Waves are rare, and they can be dangerous. This is only the 8th bull
market in the past 95 years to see a double top in the Coppock. The table at
right shows that in 5 of the previous cases the second peaks were associated
with the start of the more notorious bear markets of the past century: 1929,
1969, 1973, 2000, and 2007.
Coppock Guide
2nd Peak
in Coppock
1 Oct 1929
2 May 1946
3 Feb 1969
4 Jan 1973
5 Sept 1987
6 Apr 1998
7 Jul 2007
8 Mar 2014
Start of
Bear
S&P 500 Bear Market Loss
Sept 7, 1929
-86.2%
May 29, 1946
-28.8%
Nov 29, 1968
-36.1%
Jan 11, 1973
-48.2%
Aug 25, 1987
-33.5%
Mar 24, 2000
-49.1%
Oct 9, 2007
-56.8%
May 21, 2015?
?
5 /InvesTech
Research
February 12, 2016
The investing dilemma today is that leading economic evidence is not pointing to an imminent recession. In fact, for
the most part, economic indicators are showing no recession on the horizon. The U.S. Leading Economic Index [see the
January 29, 2016 Interim Bulletin] has barely turned down, and is considerable distance from falling under its 18-month
moving average a warning flag that typically occurs 4-12 months prior to the start of recession.
Consumers also commonly provide early confirmation of an imminent recession with a drop in confidence. There are
two gauges for measuring this from the Conference Board (top graph) and the University of Michigan/Reuters (bottom
graph). Both are holding up surprisingly well.
The two caveats we have in tracking these gauges are:
Sometimes consumer confidence doesnt fall significantly until the recession is well underway (1981 and 1990).
Even though consumer confidence leads the start of recession, that does not mean it leads the stock market. Very
often confidence will start falling after the peak on Wall Street.
That makes the upcoming reports on consumer confidence and sentiment particularly important.
Consumer Confidence
160
120
80
40
0
Next Release
Feb 23
49-yr
average
RECESSIONS
Conference Board
67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
Consumer Sentiment
120
100
Next Release
Feb 12
80
60
40
49-yr
average
RECESSIONS
University of Michigan/Reuters
67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
60
60
50
40
30
20
RECESSIONS
10
0
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
11
13
15
One area of confidence that is NOT holding up lies in the Conference Boards survey of corporate CEO confidence.
This recent drop is significant, and unrelated to political showdowns in Washington like the previous two drops in
this recovery. More importantly,
that December quarterly survey
CEO Confidence
doesnt include the effects of the
80
market rout since the start of the
70
year, or what CEOs are revealing
in their earnings calls:
60
50
Reuters 2/2/16
40
30
20
fear of
fiscal cliff
fear of
debt ceiling
showdown
RECESSIONS
Conference Board
77
79
81
83
85
87
89
91
93
95
97
99
01
03
05
07
09
11
13
15
The Institute for Supply Management (ISM) surveys are also not confirming a recession yet. The ISM Purchasing
Managers Index for manufacturing has dipped below 50. But that is not uncommon in mid-cycle slowdowns of past
economic recoveries.
80%
70
60
50
48.2%
mid-cycle
slowdowns
40
30
20
RECESSIONS
49 51 53 55 57 59 61 63 65 67 69 71 73 75 77 79 81 83 85 87 89 91 93 95 97 99 01 03 05 07 09 11 13 15
70%
65
60
55
50
45
40
35
30
53.9%
RECESSIONS
Institute for Supply Management
97 98
99
00
01
02
03
04
05
06
07
08
09
10
11
12
13
14
15
In Summary
Technical evidence is confirming that we are in a bear market that will likely take blue chip indexes to at least a 20%
loss. However, the most leading economic evidence is not signaling a recession on the horizon which Fed Chair Janet
Yellen confirmed this week in leaving the possibility of further interest rate hikes on the table.
Our Model Fund Portfolio shown below is already the most defensively positioned since the start of this bull
market in both cash allocation and sector weighting. If technical evidence continues to deteriorate, or leading
economic indicators finally confirm the possibility (probability) of recession, then we will take increasingly defensive
steps in our Model Portfolio.
PERCENT FUND
SYMBOL
19%
5%
14%
7%
2%
17%
9%
16%
3%
8%
52-WEEK
Hi
Low
INIT. RECOMMENDED
Date
Price
International
3%
Health Care
17%
FOR NEW SUBSCRIBERS: Purchases after our initial recommendation must be made
at your discretion. We currently advise bringing your portfolio in line with our recommended
allocation by phasing into the market over approximately two to three months.
Industrials
9%
RECENT
PRICE
------- -----------------------------------------------------------------------------
XLY
81.43 70.16 11/18/11
35.54
70.16
XLP
51.24 45.07
7/1/11
27.82
49.63
XLE
81.02 51.77
7/1/11
69.13
55.94
XLF
25.29 20.85
6/8/12
13.21
20.95
XLV
76.61 64.01
7/1/11
33.28
64.40
XLI
56.94 48.01
7/1/11
34.48
50.04
XLK
44.34 37.34 11/18/11
23.34
39.50
MACSX
18.48 14.90
5/8/09
9.52
15.53
SH
23.31 20.38 12/15/15
20.91
22.54
Cash
19%
Technology
16%
ALTERNATE FUNDS
Money Market Fund
7 /InvesTech
Research
February 12, 2016
PERSONALPERSPECTIVE
USA TODAY
Jan. 4, 1988
An important consideration today is to recognize that you have total control over your own investment odds.
Following a blind 100% invested allocation in the 7th year of a bull market is a high-risk strategy. That is why we
have been gradually, yet methodically, moving toward
a more defensive position when the first technical
Bear Market Repos
warning flags started appearing early last year.
S&P 500 Bull Market Gains
Repossessed by Subsequent Bear Market
We also recognize the potential downside risk of this
bear market if economic evidence starts to confirm
2007
a probable recession. In that case, it would most
2000
1990
likely not be just the 20-25% decline that one might
1987
anticipate. Over the course of the past 85 years,
1980
bear markets have typically repossessed one-half or
1973
more of the previous bull markets gain. The table
1969
1966
at left which we have shown several times over
1962
the past year is another important reminder to not
1956
underestimate the risk of this bull market if bearish
1948
evidence continues to mount. Based on the S&P 500
1946
1938
gain during this bull market from the March 9, 2009
1937
low to the May 21, 2015 peak, if the next bear market
1933
repossessed half of that gain, it would equate to a
0
1/4
1/2
3/4
All
-34.1% bear market.
InvesTech Research
Although that might sound scary, its also important to know that: 1) We are defensively positioned, and our
portfolio is currently holding up much better than the broad market. And 2) Were fully prepared to move more
defensive if evidence reveals this bear market will turn into a bigger one. And lastly, on an encouraging note,
we want to re-emphasize the message conveyed by the 95-year Coppock Guide graph (inside) that this bear will
ultimately lead to the best buying opportunity in this decade.
The INVESTECH RESEARCH newsletter is published 13 times per year and includes access to the weekly InvesTech Financial Hotline, as well as Online Interim Bulletin available between issues. This
publication is not a solicitation to buy or offer to sell any of the securities listed or reviewed herein. The contents of this letter have been compiled from original and published sources believed to be
reliable, but are not guaranteed as to accuracy or completeness. James B. Stack is also President of Stack Financial Management (SFM), a registered investment advisor, and a separate company from
InvesTech Research. Clients of SFM and individuals associated with InvesTech Research may have positions in, and may from time to time make purchases or sales of, securities mentioned herein.
Please remember that past performance may not be indicative of future results. Different types of investments involve varying degrees of risk, and there can be no assurance that the future performance
of any specific investment, investment strategy, or product (including the investments and/or investment strategies recommended or undertaken by InvesTech Research), made reference to directly or
indirectly in this newsletter will be profitable, equal any corresponding indicated historical performance level(s), be suitable for your portfolio or individual situation, or prove successful. Due to various
factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may no longer be reflective of current opinions or positions. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or
information contained in this newsletter serves as the receipt of personalized investment advice from InvesTech Research. Please refer to our website at www.investech.com for full disclosure information.
SUBSCRIPTION RATES (U.S. dollars): InvesTech Research . . . . . . . . . . . . $295/yr (Foreign add $2.00/mo)
THIS NEWSLETTER IS PROTECTED BY COPYRIGHT LAW. UNAUTHORIZED DISTRIBUTION AND/OR REPRODUCTION BY PHOTOCOPY OR ANY OTHER MEANS IS STRICTLY PROHIBITED
AND PUNISHABLE BY A FINE OF UP TO $25,000. Offenders risk non-refundable cancellation of their subscription. For additional guidance, please contact our office at 406-862-7777.
Why use a bear fund instead of selling positions and raising cash?
Increasing cash in the portfolio is an important part of a defensive strategy, but there are several reasons for maintaining
select long positions and partially offsetting them with the insurance policy of a bear market fund:
Diversification: Bear fund insurance allows you to hold onto more stocks in a portfolio, thus maintaining
greater diversification while counteracting the impact of a stock or sector that doesnt perform as anticipated.
Lower portfolio volatility: Market volatility usually increases as risks rise. A strategy that manages risk
is inherently less volatile, and by neutralizing a portion of the portfolio, volatility is reduced.
Dividends: Dividend payments continue for the positions that are maintained in a portfolio.
Reduce capital gains tax: In taxable accounts, selling stocks can create sizeable realized gains. Limiting
sales can lessen the tax bite.
Prepare for the next bull market: When risks begin to resolve and the time is right to increase market
allocation, new additions for the portfolio must be properly vetted prior to purchase. In the meantime,
exposure can be quickly increased by removing the bear fund, which de-neutralizes a portion of the
portfolio to participate in the market recovery without delay.
InvesTech Research
Model Fund Portfolio
The net long position in the Model Fund Portfolio is currently 65%. Fully one-third
of the portfolio is not exposed to the downside effects of the market due to the
protective cash and inverse index (short) bear fund. But how does this all add up?
As illustrated in the chart at right, current holdings include 73% long funds (blue), 8%
short bear fund (red), and 19% cash (yellow). The bear fund effectively neutralizes
or offsets the impact of an equivalent position of long holdings (shaded blue area). In
other words, if the long position moves down, the bear fund moves up and the return
on that combination should be negligible for the day. Therefore, the net long position,
or overall exposure to the equity market, is the 73% long position minus the 8% short
position which is equal to a 65% net long position.
100%
90
80
70
Cash 19%
Unaffected by
Market Movements
Bear Fund 8%
60
50
40
30
Long Funds
73%
Net Long 65%
20
10
0
*2/12/16
Why was the ProShares Short S&P 500 ETF (SH) chosen for the Model Fund Portfolio?
We recommended SH for a number of reasons. Our portfolio holdings are based on S&P 500 sectors, so its appropriate to
select an inverse index fund correlated to this broad market Index. ProShares Short S&P 500 was incepted in 2006 and
has a solid track record through the last bear market. It is the largest and most liquid inverse S&P 500 fund, currently
holding over $1.6B in assets. We also like some of the advantages ETFs have over mutual funds such as lower expense
ratios and the ability to trade throughout the day. Notably, on August 24 last year, when intraday volatility impacted the
liquidity of some exchange-traded funds and left investors asking, What the E-T-F happened?, SH continued to trade
smoothly throughout the day. (For more detail on ETF action that day, see our September 18, 2015 issue).
Finally, this fund is passively managed to inversely correlate to the Indexs daily returns. Actively managed funds typically
focus on profiting from shorting individual stocks, frequently use resource holdings, and may concentrate on attempts to
time the market. Performance can vary depending on the managers ability to pick the right stocks to short. Thus, for a
safety-first strategy, a more predictable passive fund is the best choice for our purposes.
February 12, 2016
(Over, please)
Weve assembled a list of some of the larger funds that have longer track records, including both ETFs and mutual funds.
Before purchasing any on the list, you should perform your own due diligence to determine the suitability for your
portfolio. Reasons for providing these
additional choices include:
Bear Market Funds
Some retirement accounts are limited to
mutual fund investments only.
Fund
Net Assets
Inception
Fund Name
Type
Fund Objective
($MM)
When using a passively managed
ProShares Short S&P 500 (SH)
ETF
Inverse S&P 500
$1,650
Jun 2006
fund, its best to choose one based on
ProShares Short Dow 30 (DOG)
ETF
Inverse DJIA
$327
Jun 2006
an index that most closely matches your
ProShares Short QQQ (PSQ)
ETF
Inverse Nasdaq
$254
Jun 2006
portfolio holdings.
Rydex Inverse S&P 500 (RYURX)
Mutual Fund Inverse S&P 500
$126
Jan 1994
If you are willing to accept the added risk
PIMCO StocksPLUS Short (PSSAX) Mutual Fund Total Return
$2,100
Jul 2006
Grizzly Short Fund (GRZZX)
Mutual Fund Total Return
$268
Jun 2000
that comes with an actively managed fund,
S&P 500
1600
1400
Due to the compounding of daily returns, performance over periods longer than
one day will likely differ from the inverse of the target index. To demonstrate, lets
look at an exaggerated example of how compounding affects returns.
1200
1000
-56.8%
800
600
$110
+57.4%
2007
2008
2009
2010
100
90
+92.3%
-43.5%
80
70
60
50
40
Bear Market
2007
2008
Bull Market
2009
2010
Assume that both ProShares Short S&P 500 (SH) and the S&P 500 start with a value
of $100. On Day 1, the S&P 500 loses 10% causing SH to gain 10%. The S&P 500,
therefore, ends Day 1 with a price of $90, while SH has grown to $110. If on Day 2
the S&P 500 loses 10% again, its price drops to $81 and SH increases to $121. While
achieving perfect correlation on a daily basis, after two days the S&P 500 is down
19% and SH is up 21%.
If the stock market continues to decline after purchasing a bear fund, gains can be
much more than you might expect due to progressively larger dollar changes based
on the increasing value of the investment. On the other hand, if the stock market
rises persistently after a bear fund is purchased, the daily percentage changes result
in progressively smaller dollar changes as the value of the investment decreases.
Hence, investors lose less than they might expect when the funds return over the
course of the rally is calculated.
This point is illustrated in the graphs above, which show the S&P 500 and SH after the stock market peak in October 2007.
Clearly, bear funds can serve as valuable insurance in a declining market, even if the position is held past the market
bottom. One important note: bear fund performance in trendless, volatile markets is less predictable than in markets
persistently trending up or down. In fact, due to compounding effects, an inverse index fund may even decline as the
market remains flat.
A leveraged bear fund is designed to go up two or three times as much as its benchmark goes down on a daily basis.
More might sound better to the average investor; however, trying to time bear markets or corrections rarely works, and
one can easily get burned with leveraged funds if the market doesn't move as anticipated and the compounding effect is
magnified. With this in mind, wed avoid the leveraged bear market funds due to the increased volatility and risk.
Summary
Bear market funds should be used to neutralize portfolio risk and help you sleep at night not as a tool for speculative
short-term trading. With a safety-first investment strategy, an inverse index fund can serve as an effective, low cost
insurance offering an efficient way to offset rising market risk and reduce portfolio volatility. When considering a bear
fund, the following guidelines should be helpful:
Use bear funds as an insurance to offset a portion of your portfolio investments.
Stay with the passively managed bear funds that inversely correlate with the broader indexes.
Choose the larger more liquid funds with longer track records.
Gradually implement a bear fund position as a bear market becomes more likely.
Do not use leveraged funds.
If bear funds are not an option for your portfolio, the alternative is to reduce your long positions to reach the target net
allocation and hold the balance in cash.
Offer
Expi
r
Soon es
!
InvesTech Research is the most detailed, thorough, and objective information resource you can use for
safely managing your portfolio. We pride ourselves on recognizing the best prot opportunities during bull
markets, and no one is better at protecting those prots during bear markets. And now youre invited to take
advantage of the same low subscription rates we oered in the 1980s.
4-year Charter Renewal Only $540. A $640 discount off a full-price subscription.
3-year Charter Renewal Only $425. A discount of $460 off a full-price subscription.
25000
Afghanistan War
20000
15000
10000
5000
4000
SELLING VACUUM
(very bullish)
Stock Market
InvesTech Research
Inflation
DISTRIBUTION
(high danger)
2000
S&P 500
800
600
500
1500
100
60
50
Log Scale
62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Black Tuesday
(market falls -11.7%)
500
Korean War
400
100
Social Security
Act
Collapse of German
banking system
Securities &
Exchange Act
50
40
30
Fall of France
Germany invades
Austria
Rome-Berlin
Axis formed
Smoot-Hawley Act
Tariffs rise 44%
Watergate scandal
Pres. Nixon resigns
Pres. Kennedy
assassinated
NATO established
14
13
12
AT&T divestiture
Gore contests
Presidential Election
outcome
200
150
100
U.S. takes
over AIG in
$85 billion bailout
Russia defaults
on foreign debt
80
70
60
Japan experiences
several 1930s-style
"run-on-banks"
50
40
Nuclear disaster
at Chernobyl
Investment
Advisors Act
of 1940
30
Mexican Peso
collapses
-40% in 2 wks
20
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
Inflation
Gold hits
$1000/oz
Gold hits
$1895/oz
U.S. abandons
gold standard
Wage/price freeze
OPEC "quarrels"
Oil drops from
$30/bbl to $13/bbl
Oil hits
$77/bbl
Oil hits
$145/bbl
Oil hits
$44/bbl
SFM
15
14
13
Peak in Real Estate Prices
(Housing bubble pops)
12
11
Recessions
10
9
8
Discount Rate - %
10
Fed Funds Rate
Target Range
0% to 0.25%
5
4
3
2
1
0
Fed revises
Discount Rate
calculation
10
+14
+12
+10
+8
+6
+4
+2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
16
11
300
Congress passes
NAFTA
Alaska/Hawaii
become states
16
15
Republicans control
Senate & House
USSR dissolves first time in 40yrs
Chinese Tiananmen
Square incident
Space shuttle
Challenger explodes
United Nations
established
Log Scale
10
Pearl Harbor
U.S. declares war
Lindbergh makes
first solo
transatlantic flight
Armstrong walks
on moon
Battle of Midway
Roosevelt declares
"Bank Holiday"
+14
+12
+10
+8
+6
+4
+2
0
-2
-4
-6
-8
-10
-12
-14
Gramm-Rudman
"balanced budget" bill
Germany surrenders
D-Day - Allies invade
Normandy
Lehman Brothers
collapses
Warsaw Pact
600
400
150
1500
800
JPMorgan Chase
acquires collapsed
Bear Stearns
Bay of Pigs
3000
500
World War II
200
5000
1000
BP oil spill in
Gulf of Mexico
S&L bailout
estimated to exceed
$350 billion
300
GM files for
bankruptcy
British/Argentine
conflict in Falklands
6-Day Middle
East War
8000
7000
6000
2000
Enron bankruptcy
largest in history
Alan Greenspan
appointed
Federal Reserve Chairman
U.S. invades
Grenada
600
Federal Reserve
arranges bailout of
LTCM hedge fund
U.S. launches
Operation Desert Storm
Vietnam War
800
20
Superstorm Sandy
strikes Northeast
Stock Markets
closed Oct. 29-30
80
10000
4000
200
1000
80
70
60
Nasdaq
loss = -78%
1987 Crash
"Black Monday"
Market falls -23%
400
150
2000
15000
Janet Yellen appointed
Federal Reserve Chair
2010
Flash Crash
300
3000
Terrorist attacks
on WTC &
Pentagon
American Economy
Wall Chart
1925-2016
Interest Rates
1500
1000
20000
Iraq War
60
40
20
0
0
-50
-100
2500
8000
7000
6000
25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08 09 10 11 12 13 14 15
(Over, please)
Be Our Guest at
For the current bull market to extend through 2016, it must become the second longest bull market
in U.S. history. What are the historical odds of that occurring, and what could derail it into a
ferocious bear market? More importantly, how should you change and adapt your investment
strategy in this election year? James Stack and his Portfolio Team will explore tactics that are most
successful in capturing late-stage bull market profits, and lay out a road map for negotiating the
next major market decline.
To make better investing decisions in the coming months, we also encourage you to attend this special educational
workshop offered by members of the Stack Financial Management Portfolio Team:
The Best Stocks of a Generation:
Evidence from the Past, Ideas for Today!
Thursday, March 3 3:20-4:05pm
SFM Portfolio Management Team
What are the best performing stocks of the past 10, 20, and 30
years? Why have they consistently outperformed the market?
More importantly, what clues do they give us for finding
actionable investment ideas today? Join the Stack Financial
Management team of Annell Danczyk, Brian Lazorishak, and
Eric Vermulm as they detail what DNA the great companies of
the past shared, and which current stocks have these same
genes. Come hear SFMs top recommendations and you
may discover one of the best companies of the next decade!
Brian Lazorishak
CFA, CMT, CIPM
For complete conference details and to register for FREE admission, call MoneyShow toll-free 1-800-970-4355 or visit
their website at www.orlandomoneyshow.com (please be sure to mention priority code 040243).