You are on page 1of 5

>> Home >> Magazine >> This page

>> 500+ other articles are available in our archive

Low Viz Camouflage Variations and Colour Accuracy

n by Rafi Ben-Shahar

Like you, all scale modellers would want to have their creations to represent the real object as accurately as it can possibly be done.
Many hurdles stand on the way to perfection. One of the major and probably most frustrating obstacles is getting your colours right.
The different colours that we see are reflections of light from objects. The spectrum of light reflected depends primarily on the
substance that covers the object and in our case, the paint coat.
As you probably know, if you manage to get an authentic colour chip and match your paint with the chip, the scale model will not
look right once the correct paint is applied. A lot has been written about the supposedly exact colours of the camouflage patterns,
including the amount of variation with respect to the original tone due to weathering or wrong paint applications on the original
aircraft. Useful as it might be, this kind of reference material represents only the tip of the iceberg.
Other articles have been devoted to the idea of colour compensation, or so-called scale effect. Based on the idea that colours
viewed from the distance appear lighter, it is claimed that the representation of colour on your model needs to be lightened to
compensation in scale to the viewing distance from the subject. Traditionally, adding 20% of white is often stipulated for 1/48 scale
model.
The reason why the supposedly accurate rendition of colour hues in relation to scale do not reach the desired objective stems from
the existence of other factors not incorporated in the colour mixing process. Variations in weather conditions, angle and temperature
of light, humidity, background colours are only a few environmental factors that obstruct our way to perfections. Other factors depend
on instruments of measurement, namely cameras, processing, editing and presentational means. The latter stands for the mean of
observing the object, such as the computer screen or a photograph. It also means under which conditions your model would be
presented. Artificial lighting is a crucial issue as well as varying degrees of exposure to sunlight.

So, how do we get out of this mess and mix the colours right?

I chose here a problematic issue to demonstrate an easy way to be satisfied with your efforts. US naval aircraft have been painted
with low visual camouflage schemes for over two decades. The schemes include two or three tones of grey that have specifications
anchored in regulations according to the Federal Standard 595B. I noticed variations to the standard schemes, but for our
discussions let's assume that we have done a thorough research and that the right FS colours for the particular aircraft are available.
Now, if you dilute the paint with 20% white, your results are unlikely to be satisfying. Why? As noted above, too many factors are
involved and were not incorporated.
What do you do now? Do yourself a favour and do not apply the decals and stash the model in a remote corner of your display
case. Take the decals (preferably, before applying the paint coat) and compare the (normally two) grey tones of decals with the
colours of your choice (by the way, it seems to me that for the Harrier, Hasegawa got it wrong). Now, the decals that go on the
sides of the fuselage and lower surfaces should be somewhat darker by comparison to the surrounding background. The decals on
top surfaces should be lighter by comparison to the surrounding background. These tonal differences are actually more crucial for
the final looks of your model than the exact shades of the camouflage!

Typically, you would be building Hasegawa kits for US naval aircraft and will probably use the accompanying decals that may not be
in the right grey shade. Getting the appropriate grey shade decal is a daunting task and may cost you time and money. Therefore,
adjusting the grey tones of your paints in relation to the available decals would produce the best result. Hence, contrast is the name
of the game for grey paints.
All this could be summarized as one more reason why I prefer to paint late War Luftwaffe schemes. Nobody can tell the true colour
combination - they always look good!

This page: "Low Viz Camouflage Variations and Colour Accuracy"


Has been last updated: 2008-02-03
The URL of the page is: http://www.ipmsstockholm.org/magazine/2008/01/low-viz.htm
Downloaded at: 2012-12-01 14:52

Copyright 1997-2006 by IPMS Stockholm and the Community Members. All Rights Reserved.
The layout and graphics of this site, HTML and program code are Copyright 1997-2006 Martin Waligorski. Used by permission.
Terms of use: This site is an interactive community of enthusiasts interested in the art of scale modelling of aircraft, armor, figures, spacecraft and similar
subjetcs. All material within this site is protected under copyright, and may only be reproduced for personal use. You must contact the Author(s) and/or Editor
for permission to use any material on this site for any purpose other than private use.

You might also like