Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 6
Contents
Introduction
Background
Matters to be considered if existing ladders are not to be maintained
Relevant legal requirements
References
Further information
Tables 1 and 2
Appendix A
Introduction
This sheet advises duty holders that a change in the means of descent to sea will normally comprise a material
change to the safety case , requiring submission of a revised safety case to HSE. In addition, for any such
change, a number of matters will need to be considered, to ensure continuing compliance with the Offshore
Installations (Prevention of Fire and Explosion, and Emergency Response) Regulations 1995 (PFEER). This
sheet provides guidance on these matters, where the intention is to replace ladders to sea with an alternative
means of descent to sea.
Background
Fixed ladders (which may include some associated gangways and/or stairways) to sea are often provided as part
of compliance with PFEER Regulation 16. Such ladders are subject to corrosion and wave impact, and there is
expense and risk involved in maintaining them. Some duty holders may consider not maintaining the ladders,
instead relying on alternative means of descent to sea. There are a number of matters which will need to be
considered to ensure continuing compliance with PFEER.
PFEER Regulation 16, and the Approved Code of Practice and Guidance1 for this regulation are given in
Appendix A. Other relevant PFEER Regulations are identified in Table 1.
Means of escape from an offshore installation normally comprises two elements: (1) a means of descent to sea
level, and (2) something which offers some protection from the elements and avoids the need to enter the sea
directly.
Means of descent to sea provided on UK offshore installations vary widely, depending on the installation and
circumstances. Such means may include fixed ladders, retractable ladders, stairways, liferaft davits, chutes
(typically Skyscape), and/or personal descender devices.
Liferafts are usually provided for protection from the elements and to avoid the need to enter the sea directly.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010
Page 2 of 6
Historically, the means of descent provided have included knotted ropes or scramble nets. However, these are
not regarded as a suitable primary means of descent to sea, because not all persons working offshore will have
the physical capability to safely use them. HSE has not required these means of descent to be removed from
offshore installations, but it is necessary to provide other means of descent to satisfy PFEER Regulation 16.
Means of escape are provided as a back up system in case the arrangements for evacuation fail. Means of
escape are not required to provide the same level of protection from hazards as the evacuation system, and do
not necessarily include motive power or other means to enable persons to move quickly away from the
installation. Note that lifeboats, gangways between installations, and marine transfer systems are normally
provided as a means of evacuation, rather than a means of escape.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010
Page 3 of 6
means of descent, and will depend on the numbers and likely locations of persons on the installation. The
number who may need to escape at any one time is likely to be less than the total POB, but the duty holder
will need to ensure appropriate access to sufficient means of descent to sea both for the largest groups
who may need to escape (mass escape) and for isolated individuals. For example, the largest group who
need to escape may be the full complement of a lifeboat which is found to be unavailable. In some cases, it
may be appropriate to provide two means of descent to sea, one for mass escape at specific locations, and
another more distributed means of escape for individuals.
9. The means of descent will need to deliver escapees to a point at which they can board a liferaft (assuming
that liferafts have been selected as the means of providing protection from the elements, and avoiding the
need to enter the sea directly).
10. If ladders are no longer in a safe condition, the duty holder must ensure that appropriate arrangements are
in place (i) to fully inform the workforce, (ii) to prevent use of the ladders, and (iii) to ensure that any
remaining parts of the ladders do not present a risk should they fall off.
11. In addition to the requirements related to PFEER Regulations 5 and 16, the duty holder must ensure that
the replacement means of descent complies with other relevant PFEER Regulations, as per Table 1.
[2]
[1]
Regulation 14(2)
References
Prevention of fire and explosion, and emergency response on offshore installations Approved Code of Practice
and Guidance 2nd edition L65 HSE Books 1997 ISBN 0 7176 1386 0
Further information
Any queries relating to this information sheet should be addressed to:
Health and Safety Executive
Hazardous Installations Directorate
Offshore Division
Lord Cullen House
Fraser Place
Aberdeen AB25 3UB
Tel: 01224 252500
This information sheet contains notes on good practice which are not compulsory but which you may find
helpful in considering what you need to do
Tables 1 and 2
Table 1. PFEER Regulations applicable to the means of descent to sea
(See PFEER Regulations for precise wording)
PFEER Regulation
5 Assessment
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010
Page 4 of 6
PFEER Regulation
The use of the means of descent must be adequately covered in the Emergency
Response Plan, and associated drills and exercises.
16 Means of escape
18 Suitability of personal
protective equipment for use in
an emergency
This regulation places responsibility on the duty holder to provide suitable personal
protective equipment for use in an emergency.
The means of descent to sea and any protective clothing provided for use in an
emergency must be compatible.
The means of descent must be suitable for the purpose for which it is used or provided.
There must be arrangements to maintain the means of descent in efficient working
order and good repair.
It is expected the means of descent will be designated as a safety critical element, and
as such must be covered by a suitable written scheme for the systematic examination
by a competent and independent person (the ICP).
Table 2. Example of a qualitative risk comparison between fixed ladders and personal
descender devices
Risk
Ladder
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010
Page 5 of 6
Risk
Ladder
Risk due to
unavailability of
means of
escape
Very small.
Risks from
installation and
maintenance
Appendix A
Guidance and the Approved Code of Practice associated with PFEER Regulation 16
(taken from HSE Books document L65 Second Ed[3].)
PFEER Regulation 16 "Means of escape"
The duty holder shall provide such means as will ensure, so far as is reasonably practicable, the safe escape of
all persons from the installation in case arrangements for evacuation fail.
Guidance
The regulation requires the duty holder to provide means of escape so that persons may escape from the
installation in the event of the failure of the evacuation system in a catastrophic incident when a planned and
orderly evacuation cannot be achieved.
This paragraph explains some of the terms relevant to the regulation:
escape means the process of leaving the installation in an emergency when the evacuation system has
failed; it may involve entering the sea directly and is a 'last resort' method of getting persons off the
installation;
means of escape cover items which assist with descent to the sea, such as davit-launched life-rafts,
chute systems, ladders, and individually controlled descent devices; and items in which personnel can
float on reaching the sea, such as throw-over life-rafts.
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010
Page 6 of 6
http://www.hse.gov.uk/offshore/infosheets/is10-2009.htm?ebul=offshore/jan-2010&cr... 27/01/2010