NO.

________________

IN THE
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES

THE PEOPLE
Including Susan Herbert, The US Military And The Employees of SCOTUS

BARACK OBAMA
And The
Sitting Officers Of The US

Susan Herbert, pro se and pro bono

1100 Seagate Avenue 101
Neptune Beach, FL 32266

AFFIRMATION

TO THE HONORABLE JOHN ROBERTS, CHIEF JUSTICE OF THE SUPREME

COURT: Pursuant to Rules 22 and 23 of the Rules of this Court and 28 U.S.C. §§
1651(a) and 2101(f), Petitioners, The People, respectfully request a stay of
enforcement of the judgment below pending the disposition of a petition for a writ of
certiorari to the Supreme Court of the US as this then makes this case a case of
constitutional authority and original jurisdiction to be heard in person by the Supreme
Court of the US. This would also prevent the world court from adjudicating the
innocence or guilt of SCOTUS employees via a finding of fault as a world court
petition has already been filed. The decision below violates the entire Constitution
namely the very essence of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the
Fourteenth Amendment as well as the Declaration itself thus it violates the spirit of
our law absolutely and wholly; it violates The People. A stay pending this Court’s
review of the substantial federal question/s present is essential to prevent Applicants
from suffering irreparable injury as a direct result of the wrongly decided point of law.
Petitioners or Applicants Susan Herbert acting on behalf of The People who gave
their consent, respectfully submits to this honorable court, having exhausted all
available remedies so that she became the very first citizen to exhaust the process
entirely as proven by prior SCOTUS filings as she directly entered this court for the
first time since 1803 with Petition 08-6622 that there is no other jurisdictions available
to her to review. In her case as she is a woman she is a member of the class not yet
accorded equal protection of the law as the Executive is and has been exclusively
male and in her unique case she is the citizen who filed and pressed the case in the
name of The People against Barack Obama as he does not qualify under the terms
of The Constitution and the other candidates upon the Presidential ballot as they

1
lacked the human ability to keep The People safe, and later every sitting Officer thus
recently Barack Obama himself used a US Marshal to threaten her life directly also
threatening that she would be falsely imprisoned and even killed if she ever filed the
truth again in any federal court including US Supreme Court thus he then threatened
this court and its employees as well. Also: now that US Marshal’s life is at stake as is
the police officer witness as the false belief that Obama and the Officers possess is
that I can never, ever connect them to this crime if they murder the people who are
the chain of causation. The unjust persons involved truly believe you can murder the
truth if you murder the messenger when you cannot. The People then have no other
recourse. Petitioner Susan Herbert submits to this court that the very survival of the
Republic is at stake as Article 4 Section 4 has fallen save her one person and The
People who have joined the class. This matter reflects a vitally important issue of
public interest, Is the constitutionally set government The People or The Officers, and
presents a unique Constitutional question of first impression as to the final test of
Marbury as the refusal to deliver the paper commission itself – a refusal to hear the
case in person that entered directly upon a violation of Marbury by this very Court -
has now become the violation of the right itself as it effectively removed The People
from the Constitution and replaced them with paper, law licenses and money, and it
also addresses the significance of the “natural birth” term as enumerated in Article 2,
Section 1 as a qualifier and qualifier for all who seek the office of the President of the
United States. Lastly it addresses a gross violation of separation of powers by the
sitting Officers as a two party monopoly arose that then allowed the very persons
seeking this office, Senators, to then Resolve to violate this term thus creating an
impossible Catch-22 legal situation for all harmed as this then would arise as a court
challenge via chain of command to the sitting President – impossible as the very
beneficiaries of Res. 511 now sit. All of these actions target women and the ethical
and targeted me specifically and exactly as I am unique: I’m the proof. A stay is also
consistent with this Court’s decision to obey an Executive Order issued by my person
in Petition 07-9804 thus I already moved the Court equaling myself to any lawyer,
any Officer, any SCOTUS clerk and any Justice. The Court may treat this application
as a petition for a writ of certiorari and precedent to do so was established by Bush V
Gore and Donofrio V Wells. Extraordinary circumstances exist, including a Resolution
made by the state of GA that charges 5 Justices of the Supreme Court are guilty of
treason and which The People now truly believe to be fact and law due to Barack
Obama’s recent attack upon the Supreme Court and BVG. I, Susan Herbert, possess
no conflicting interests. See, BVG, 2000 e.g., Barefoot v. Estelle, 463 U.S. 880, 887
(1983); Nebraska Press Ass’n v.Stuart, 423 U.S. 1011, 423 U.S. 1027 (1975);
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. Volpe, 400 U.S. 939 (1970), 401 U.S. 402,
406 (1971)

2
 Opinions

The opinions of the Northern District of Iowa which ignored all fact and law plus all
US case law are attached. The most recent ruling is an actual judgment in a civil case
that strikes The People from The Constitution; no US attorneys were present nor was
I or any other person. It constitues a court of admiralty, a civil conviction without any
trial or jury and this is one of the unjust actions our Founders meant to end with our
Revolution and founding as a government of People not titles. The Seventh
Amendment’s original intent was to ensure trial by jury and Gideon was meant to
ensure a defense if any criminal charge is pressed against you. The date of this
judgment is very telling: March 22, 2010: The day after “Obamacare” was
unconstitutionally and even criminally forced upon The People. This is not an
accident or a mistake; it was deliberate and I can and will prove it. This is significant
in light of the facts of my case which is then The People’s case. Other opinions are
the opinions of this very court, Petitions 07-9804, 08-6622 and 09-6777 as they
denied The People standing by denying their humanity thus erroneously not wrongly
awarded power and authority to titles, lawyers and money.

Relief Requested

A gag order against Barack Obama and the sitting Officers as a clear and present
danger exists – a facist government now sits thus the form is changed to that other
than a constitutional Republic as Obama is not natural born and as I can and will
prove a plot existed ot then replace The People thus the Republic with money in
various forms like law licesens thus the wealthy as the power and authority - and a
hearing in person before the Supreme Court to then adjudicate the paper commission
itself thus informing The People and forcing delivery of the actual paper, a SCOTUS
ruling for The People and for Susan Herbert plus the delivery of the founding
documents to The People espcicially women thus equality is achieved and SCOTUS
is made a lawful institution as Marbury is proven to be law while our founding
documents are proven to be elegant. The Founders experiment has ended; it did so
at BVG and so We are the proof the Founders said would one day exist as I, Susan,
rose to the level of proof by engaging this very Court and so successfully moving this
Court with an Executive Order thus usccessfully defending The People. Contrary to
what the Officers believe and contrary to what some of The People believe the
Republic did not fall as I assumed the risk and so floated our living government until I
could return in defense of The People as this lawsuit ripened when Obama directly
injured the People during the State of the Union Address and then when he then
directly threatened me on or around February 14th, 2010 when I served him and all in
his employ notice. I also ask that my name be placed on the 2012 ballot for President
and my solutions as to how the injury stopped or rather chain of causation can be

3
seevred and then the damage healed be considered even if they are unique as if you
have not discovered the naswer yet in over 200 years than maybe I have as I have
proved ability and capability by acting to fulfill the oath of office thus proving our one
vote makes every person a power of one so noe The People must test and prove
their own persons. My solution makes it possible for any person to secure a plce on
the ballot, any ballot.

Statement of Facts/Legal Argument

I have totally exhausted the process thus I am a first in US history. I was born into
injury and harm in December of 1967. In 2005 I finally exhausted the process in three
states: FL, PA and NY. My case left FL; it traveled in and out of several states. In PA
I invoked Marbury, forcing PA top uphold the law on behalf of women. PA refused
and acted upon unconstitutional policy targeting women and their children to then
keep my children from me and later to award the case to NY in spite of contract law.
It landed in NY in 1998 and went to PA; NY then criminally claimed jurisdiction over
again in 2001 solely to then make what was and is a kidnapping and the human
trafficking of my person and my children “legal” by upholding it with falsified and paid
for court orders. In NY and indeed in every state this corruption was endemic but in
NY it is criminal: Lawyers were allowed to enter filings when I did not want or need
representation and when I fired counsel; these filings contained lies and fabrications.
The NY Appellate then issued a ruling and order in which the Bill of Rights was
violated. I myself went back over the evidence and was able to prove graft, corruption
and bribery; it is a proven, known fact that every other NY Appellate has been caught
committing crimes in custody cases and then I, myself proved the only Appellate not
yet caught was engaged in the very same activity. Because an overwhelming male
majority exits and has existed since our founding and because women have never
receive equal protection of the law and because of the rise of the undue influence of
privateers and a protected class, politicians and lawyers, and because Marbury has
never been tested, I found not one authority was willing to obey the law in my case.
This meant that this corruption had to extend into SCOTUS due to BVG. I worked my
way up chain of command finally landing at SCOTUS; in this case you may enter
SCOTUS as a right or else the denial of hearing in person then becomes the violation
of the right itself as it makes the Officers the constitutionally set government thus no
power and no authority would belong to The People.

I secured this as a right by first contacting SCOTUS in February of 2007 and arguing
US case law and then contacting the US Military who informed me that they would
honor my legal standing if I lived it out by acting to enter SCOTUS and so standing
down the Chief Justice and/or sitting President in person in a court of law. At that
moment this case then revolved around testing Marbury V Madison as exactly like

4
Jefferson predicted an oligarchy had arisen. If all courts have been exhausted and
not one authority is willing to obey and enforce the law on behalf of women thus The
People then the only court left is SCOTUS thus The People as they must be granted
informed consent. Upon Petition 07-9804 being denied Marbury itself is violated so I
petitioned again, 08-6622, and entered directly. I entered no lower court at all. Upon
direct entry hearing in person is then the only remedy and relief or else SCOTUS is
criminalized as the lower courts now are or else no BVG and no violation of the
natural birth term. “Lawyer” then becomes privileged class with rights and honors no
other persons have thus we are now a dead institution. The Officers of the US never
responded to 08-6622 thus proving my case for me - not against SCOTUS but for
SCOTUS and for The People. However on 11/20/08 upon being informed that the
Officers defaulted SCOTUS employees then injured their own person by acting to file
the case for conference but not filing the emergency stay and instead returning it to
me. As one ethical clerk then acted to protect all clerks and Justices thus The People
I realized I might be facing another problem: If the clerks and Justices are not aware
of an injury they suffered and may have suffered from this injury back to antiquity, the
dawn of patriarchy, but that was only realized in the US at BVG then they may not
know of their own injury as it is about self-awareness. As I’m the very first citizen to
test Marbury and I am a nonlawyer and woman they might not know something. I
then accessed the Federal Appellate, the only court that I never entered, to prove to
the clerks and Justices that not one Officer was willing to enforce the law and would
willingly harm themselves rather than rule against the sitting Officers. I returned to
SCOTUS with Petition 09-6777 and found SCOTUS was still not aware of the injury:
A fascist regime had now risen as I was not accorded my protected rights in
2007/2008 when I first exhausted the process as I placed my knowledge of BVG on
the court record in 2000, in a Philadelphia County Court, as every right had been
violated then as my sons were injured before they were born and I was born into
harm and later one of my sons retained his legal status as an unborn person. The
case for equality is the case for all human beings not only women; are SCOTUS
employees of The People? Does SCOTUS answer to The People? Upon exhausting
SCOTUS once more thus justice is made impossible for The People or for SCOTUS
employees themselves an event transpired: conditions changed as the Nobel was
erroneously awarded to Obama, the second erroneous award to an American as the
Nobel committee had to violate its own rules and as “climategate” is now exposed:
Scientists were caught changing numbers and skewing evidence to then force their
political agenda upon us. No reputable scientist supports any of this activity and
many have called for these persons to be prosecuted and it irreparably harms good
science. See 07-9804 as I named the Nobels and their original intent; in my now filed
world court petition I offered to give Norway thus the planet my knowledge regarding
nuclear physics, when life begins in the womb and systems of elegant government
and law.

5
 I knew that the rise of fascism which I first witnessed in 2004 at a political rally was
here; that it had indeed spread into and was now consuming the Office of the
Executive, that I might be the only one who knows and that I would learn how Hitler
broke the will of the individual as “Hitler” is an idea and a plan of action not one
person. I could not know if fascism and treason infiltrated SCOTUS until or unless I
engaged SCOTUS directly; BVG may have been our saving grace as I know the
good math and all of the correct application no other American not even a trained
lawyer knew. I could predict: As it injured the clerks and targeted them as lawyers the
injury stops at the clerks; only some might be injured to a point of incapacitation and
if they have only harmed lawyers then I’m the test thus I’m the proof as the only
paper I have is what I create and enter to SCOTUS so the docket them will become
my law license. I could predict once I did make it to the case conferencing list with
07-9804: Barack Obama will have to directly confront SCOTUS and attack my person
due to my actions all meant to drive him into international waters as he is not natural
born and is a criminal (he threatened me directly thus I own this knowledge this is
now criminal as I’m the victim) thus I would have to allow SCOTUS to violate my
rights once again and then attack Obama from within world court; upon him acting to
injure SCOTUS and upon him attacking me directly? If I could secure proof of life
from him; as that is chain of command theory then I would be back at SCOTUS thus
here I am, again. An odyssey begun over three years ago to test the law absolutely
and wholly and to test Marbury is now at its end; if this case is not heard in person
and The People are not informed then they cannot and will not give informed consent
thus cannot stop fascism nor fulfill the oath of office; they have no means to protect
and defend their own persons nor will it exist in the future.

In this case the three branches of government and the Officers thereof have violated
every word and clause of US law including the entire Bill of Rights via use of courts of
admiralty, unconstitutional acts and police power or fear, intimidation and threats
along with endemic violence; women receive no protection of the law thus are subject
to the whim and will of the individual thus are subjected to mass violence unless they
agree to become the willing victims of the Officers and of unconstitutional policy; the
Officers then violated every single solitary US case law I cited including the one case
I waited to cite as it serves as proof of life: Gideon, as the only way to convict me
thus falsely imprison me and/or kill me is to commit premeditated, 1 st degree murder
and/or violate Gideon which Obama would have to do himself as we would then be
“past” Marbury only he would have to do it in secret thus could and would manipulate
a US Marshal or other federal agent. The threat was made against my person in the
form of a US Marshal; I know this order came directly from Obama due to my own
actions, prior action of SCOTUS, chain of command theory and the complex

6
concepts of law and its application the US Marshal was citing which he could not
know otherwise; it was not humanly possible for him to know and I will prove it.

Not one sitting Officer is willing to obey and enforce the law as to do so would mean
that they, Officers, would on longer be a privileged class. Currently they hide behind
their ability to access SCOTUS or to deny The People access to SCOTUS as on
American citizen has yet risen to power on their own, without money, without a
lawyer and without the help of a political party, until I did it. I deliberately, knowingly
and willingly plotted and conspired to be able to prevent these unjust persons from
overthrowing The People when this time arrived; I forced the Federal Judiciary to
issue a paper ruling which strikes The People form the Constitution and replaces The
People with paperwork and money. I entered SCOTUS first in 2007 asking the
natural birth question and asking if it constitutes treason to organize and collect
money with for the sole intent of overthrowing The People via foreingization.

I knew I could and would represent the class as I owned unique knowledge of the
US, the injury, systems of government, systems of currency, Native America,
theology, chain of command theory, the US Military, women, pregnancy and
childbirth and then the world itself. You need not hold a law license if you are the only
person to be of the ability to sue in defense of the class, The People. If I am the
victim and so are The People as a whole class and then I know and we know if a
crime has been committed but I alone can and will prove it conclusively as I resolved
Uniformity and made the case for equality and in so doing became this nation’s Chief
Law Enforcement officer via my actions as I needed no crutch and so no paper:

There are cases in which no existing writ covers the point of law such as an authority
case that is pro se; the closet precedent is Marbury and BVG in which the emergency
stay was granted hence paving the way for Certiorari but in the case of BVG? The
lawyers brought a fictitious case forward thus committed what constitutes treason as
they exploited their knowledge of the law and the process. As no pro se petitioner
who is not a lawyer has been allowed to argue before SCOTUS in person? It makes
justice impossible for The People as BVG then made all lawyers bereft of any legal
standing in the case of the natural birth clause. This is the test of Marbury V Madison
and also the test of our form of government; it proves the form the US is as a
Republic of living People under a Declaration and Constitution is elegant. It also
answers whether or not SCOTUS Justices can be guilty of treason or not as all law
arises form the will of The People thus SCOTUS Justices and Presidents arise from
The People. It proves life not paper is the proof in any constitutional Republic and
that all power and authority belongs to The People not any Officer or group of
Officers as the legal presumption is ignorance is not an excuse under the law. Finally
it asks and answers if The People ever had an actual opportunity to govern

7
themselves as humans are not equal under our law although the document, the
paper, says that they are equal. Does paper prove itself or do we prove the paper?
As I exhausted both chains of command I then will be arguing or adjudicating –
proving - both founding governing documents, the originals not the 1871 version of
our constitution as that was no longer valid once the Officers defaulted on 11/05/08.

As I have proven over and over that I am this nation’s smartest living person, that I
possess the most intelligence thus I myself am the proof that the discrimination of
women is reality then denying me entry to any court of law in person to adjudicate the
“natural birth” clause constitutes unique discrimination of my person. Olech V
Willowbrook clearly states that I may be a class of one; in this case I am a class of
one who then represents the class of many. I am the living embodiment of the law
then I will make constitutional I am statements not third person statements. My legal
arguments therefore are one legal argument: I am a declaration and constitution; I
am a power of one, a person with the power and authority to issue an Executive
Order.

Judicial review is the myth of fingerprints. Paper proves nothing for The People live to
prove the theories contained upon the paper are law or not. We prove if the Supreme
Court has hit upon the correction application of the law by living out its rulings thus
conducting the experiment. Words and actions are empty devoid of proof of life:
whose person matches the Declaration and Constitution and who’s does not? Who
secures and engenders liberty thus acts for The People as the living embodiment of
the Constitution while who denies liberty to all but the Officers?

Barack Obama is not natural born and he knew he did not qualify for the Office but
sought it regardless for selfish, self-serving interests. He set out to violate the rights
of all natural born persons targeting women. He fully understood that he was
committing a crime but was assured that not one person could or would prosecute
him and that even if a person did enter SCOTUS that he could then send an attorney
to represent his person. I ran Obama and his cronies through their places defeating
them each time until we came to the end in Sioux City Iowa. This included all of the
ex-Clintonites he immediately installed upon buying the seat but making it seem as if
he was legally elected thus going back upon every promise he ever made and
exposing himself for what he is, a fascist. He is delusional as he was raised to
believe that he is the exception to the rules and the law, always changing who he is
so that he could conform. He believes his own greatness when not one person can
point to anything he ever did on his own without a favor or a hand up; Obama never
earned any privilege or honor he was subsequently awarded. Obama presents empty
titles like “President of Harvard Law Review” as proof when Harvard cannot tell us
what that is and means and what Obama ever actually did on his own while there.

8
Students he had cannot tell us a thing he taught them and classmates cannot tell you
they even remember him. Nobody recalls his birth. His record of achievement? It is
nonexistent. My service record is my life; if Obama truly believes proof is paper then
why won’t he produce the paper? The People gave Obama several opportunities to
produce the paper while I gave him at least half a dozen: he could produce a long
form birth certificate or a SCOTUS answer, as he must answer a case of
constitutional authority entered against him. He and his lawyers never counted upon
this application of Marbury V Madison as they forgot: Marbury the man confronted
Madison not Jefferson over capacity, duty or “must”, and then legality or “may”! It
rose to Jefferson via chain of command that Madison never had to obey; Marshall
answered if James Madison as Secretary of State or if any person – any voter - was
compelled to obey any single order of any commanding officer. As I did it first and as
the only precedent is Marbury then he must answer; he failed as he is one of the
Officers who defaulted on 11/05/08 and as all you may not do is fail to make an
attempt and Obama made no attempt at all in any form to answer my suit; even bob
Bauer, Obama’s lawyer of record, has never once contacted me when he did contact
all other petitioners seeking to adjudicate this point of law.

Upon my last notice in federal court that also went after and convicted Bauer and
then his entire law firm who has interests in Laos among other foreign nations a US
Marshal came to my home and told me to my face that “they the US government”
had targeted me and that if I made any attempt to tell anyone the truth that I would be
criminally charged but w/o any trial and so falsely imprisoned; that I would be denied
any defense. This Marshal described various scenarios as if he had been told what
will happen and he finally told me that Gideon would be violated and that John
Roberts thus The People would be thrown to the lions. He used different words; he
did not realize he was describing various violations of US common law, the Bill of
Rights and several US cases like Gideon, and that these violations had to take
certain forms like a court of Admiralty. As I have been directly engaging Obama and
his cronies since 1996 I always knew where this would end as all I ever had to do to
act in defense of myself thus The People and the employees of SCOTUS was to
enter SCOTUS directly upon an Executive Order thus make it to the case conference
list as then all Americans would be informed and whoever rose to power criminally,
either Bush Jr. or Obama or McCain or even Ralph Nader, would be removed -
eventually. I knew I would someday position myself in a kill or be killed stand off and
that The People would win the day so that The Republic would not fall. To force this
stand off I engaged SCOTUS and the other federal judiciary now endemically
corrupted and even criminal itself. I forced situation upon situation constantly
leveraging power and authority back and forth until I was at my end with Obama: I
dealt the final blow in Sioux City Iowa; I made it permanent by then filing in world
court; upon receiving the paper judgment from Sioux City I am back at SCOTUS as

9
the US Marshal told me that The People would be stricken from the Constitution and
they were: The Sioux City Iowa judgment reads that The People are to be
stricken from The Constitution and replaced with paper namely money.

I can and will prove a concerted effort to “own” The People thus change our form of
government has existed since 1871 but that it was only realized with Bill Clinton and
Obama; I can and will prove absolutely as early as October of 2005 Obama and
Biden were positioning themselves to secure the Office via purchase and
propaganda but unfortunately for all unjust persons I am Susan of In Re Susan
Herbert and of Susan Herbert V Barack Obama, SCOTUS, and upon first hearing
Marbury was violated and upon second hearing? A response was due on November
5th, 2008 and no response came; as of Friday, November 7th, 2008 there was still no
response thus the US, the Officers, have defaulted. The violation of Marbury and
failure to respond by the US is then an automatic judgment of default for The People.
This then led me to then be forced to appear in local district family court, Rennselaer
County, NY, on October 24th, 2008 in the state and in the exact court with the exact
persons that violated me wholly and absolutely and upon the same claim now before
US Supreme Court. This local district family court action was filed within my 25 day
window to petition to be reheard and it was then held even after the US Supreme
Court acted to address the violation of Marbury by re-docketing my case. As the
plaintiffs and the FAMILY COURT judge as family court is the most fundamental
court cited my human ability to enter the Supreme Court and the Court itself for
refusing to accord me any and all remedy and relief thus deny my humanity in
defense of me naming my commission then they too named failure to deliver the
paper commission as the REASON to violate my rights and my children’s rights so
then the Officers of the US are at fault for my injuries and now The People’s injuries.
These injuries are unending and ceaseless until addressed:

The clerks and Justices of the Supreme Court do not know they themselves are the
target of a crime; that the fascist regime now seated was put in play expressly to
defeat SCOTUS thus shatter the faith of The People and so break their will. As
persons with socialist agendas could not get their way time and time again they
enacted a new plan: Instead of voting for any one party they began encouraging
unjust people to look for a personality type to then elect as President. At a Harvard
lecture that was more political rally than lecture “Bill Clinton” was mentioned as a
“young hopeful” out of Arkansas. I entered this eyewitness statement to federal court.
Later the very persons with the socialist agenda, the wealthy and actual foreigners,
basically anointed Bill Clinton at the annual meeting of the Bilderberger group. No
American except those in Arkansas had ever heard of Clinton and yet he was then
placed upon the Presidential ballot. We know who and what Clinton is. Next came
John Kerry with all of the same character defects and worse. And now we have

10
Obama, a lawyer exploiting his knowledge of the law and when he knows he is not
natural born and not a victim but uses propaganda to convince others that he is. His
thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs are alien to our Constitution. These people are
liars; they are manipulators and predators. These people rule via power and control
and to elect a person with these defects then allows those who bought him the Office
the ability to control him thus wield the legal power of the Executive but from behind
the scenes. It is a cabal, exactly like the Nazi regime was. It is meant to enslave The
People.

No matter what you say to these people or how you say it they are thoroughly
convinced that socialism will work in the US when socialism will never work in the US
as it will always be realized as fascism not socialism. Call it Fabian socialism; call it
whatever you wish as due to our system of government it will be realized as fascism.
Some of these people openly advertise that their prize, the ultimate prize, is control of
US and to do that you then need to control The People as the government is The
People. Thus you end up with politicians and businessmen who are Marxists and
their Nazi-like enforcers – those who have badges and guns - who pit The People
against “they the US government” as if we are enemies. Everybody knows Obama is
a socialist and is not natural born; why do federal agents like the Secret Service then
protect him? Two Secret Service agents told me why: They insist that unless the
Supreme Court hears the case then they have no choice. Every agency told me why:
They are waiting for the Supreme Court to adjudicate the delivery of the paper
commission as failure to deliver a ruling upon natural birth is now the violation of the
right thus press the final test of Marbury, the very test I began. As the Supreme Court
did not know it had been targeted? The clerks and Justices found themselves in a
position in which they too had their rights violated.

I, Susan, forced the clerks and Justices to violate me thus deny themselves delivery
of the paper commission to then force Obama into international waters. As People
who are black and people who are incapacitated by the injury known as the domestic
violence named in Article 4 section 4 and as the employees of SCOTUS had a pre-
existing injury they did not know of I then had to do this to then get Obama, the
lawyer, before John Roberts – that exact person – but not inside SCOTUS as Obama
knows he can never go there ever thus I knew that he would have to fabricate the
venue a la Clarence Thomas/Anita Hill. To topple SCOTUS he would have to do it
publicly thus hold a criminal trial before The People; it would have to be a civil
conviction that is wholly unjust; he would have to indoctrinate The People thus make
them believe the Justices are guilty while he is not. By running him into international
waters the whole world gets a good look at the truth as his own words and actions he
himself will then be the proof The People need to know he is not natural born and not
a Constitutionalist as fact and law. I have already filed in world court to then prevent

11
any of these people from escaping to another country as actual Nazi war criminals
once did; I made certain they would find no safe harbor so that their only safety rests
in telling the truth to The People. Also I will then give The People the only criminal
trial they might ever receive as SCOTUS is not a criminal court, as we do not press
charges of treason against foreigners and as we do pres charges of high treason
against those who act against the Crown which Obama did. So I deliberately, willingly
and knowingly did all I did; in Sioux City I made certain to let Obama know his
biggest fear is military custody thus he would have to pit the People with the Chief
Justice against the military via Congress. “Congress” would be the fabricated venue.
See my prior petitions as I named the Congress’ influence over the military via
allocation of funds as destructive. I named Eisenhower’s military-industrial complex
realized as ALL military contracts are politically motivated today and the US Military
falsely believes it has to appease the sitting Officers of Congress.

“I lied in wait.” I lied in self-defense as the biggest fear Obama has is not US Military
custody but British Military custody as both he and Joe Biden acted against the
Crown – Kraft just bought Cadbury which should be impossible if the US were yet a
Republic not fascist – and Biden openly admitted he plagiarized a British speech but
never suffered the consequences and now the British People are forced to suffer this
insult. Biden used that property to then harm the US and British People but yet he is
not on any US Marshal’s watch list as there is no outstanding warrant against him;
another American who did the very same thing is so as Biden was granted favored
status he has been made an expectation to the law like every other politician criminal
I know – a privileged class has risen - as no judge would allow any citizen to
prosecute Biden not even civilly. The People have been denied entry to the courts as
the Republic fell. I proved this is now a done deal; it is endemic as I exhausted the
entire Judiciary branch thus only SCOTUS is left because:

The unjust persons colluding and conspiring against us did not count upon Bush V
Gore, a separate crime itself, thus did not count upon the Justices ruling in such a
way it left the door open for any citizen to then press suit to assume the Office if they
had pure and absolute standing nor did they count upon I, Susan, as they do not truly
believe in US law or ideals thus never imagined that a lone voter could rise to power
via equal protection and due process. They did not believe a woman could defeat
them nor did they believe anyone could become President and Commander in the
US; that all you needed was your one vote. For years and years they have been lying
to us claiming that any person at all could ascend to this office when they knew they
had made it impossible but BVG and my injury changed that. They refused to believe
in the vote as they do not believe in The People or that the vote leveled the playing
field. The other thing they did not believe? That clerks would act ethically thus when
they denied the clerks their right of equal protection and due process in BVG by filing

12
as an emergency stay thus circumventing the clerks they assumed they had broken
the clerks. They, like the puppet they support, Obama, are afraid of the clerks in that
they might be as intelligent as they but act ethically? They assumed that no clerk
ever would or else Obama would have been stopped by adjudication of the natural
birth clause. Obama and his cabal knew my case is the case that defeats them thus
they assumed as I had not proceeded that it had to be the clerks. The People took on
this belief and later The People began to believe the Justices were and are actively
protecting Obama. I let Obama and all of the unjust persons around him believe that
and even used it against them. As their game is placing blame as that is what all
domestic violence is I engineered a case in which I pitted the clerks against each
other to bring the injury current so that the clerks might then be aware of it and then I
pitted the clerks against the Justices to do the very same thing, make the injury
current. I’m the constant and I own the knowledge so I had to do this to then define
the depth and magnitude of the injury. I was creating the record thus proving it was
not the clerks or Justices no matter their actions but the crime the clerks and Justices
were not aware of then affecting them and in so doing leveling the playing filed in
such a way it became a stand off between my person, John Roberts and Obama.

Proof is: Millions of Americans are behind me. After the State of the Union Address
some of these people began calling me and writing to me in anger. They insisted:
The clerks are guilty! The Justices are guilty! They know! I said they do not know as I
have not old them something yet. They responded: They know; we have a videotape
of Orly Taitz confronting John Roberts and being told his clerks are guilty. I asked:
and what did he say? Nothing. I said, Exactly! If you are a lawyer and you walk up to
John Roberts who is CHIEF JUSTICE and tell him that his clerks are guilty then he’d
say nothing as if that is the case then he’d be the first to know as that’s chain of
command theory. They cut me off: THEY KNOW AS THEY ALL SEE AND HEAR
OBAMA! OBAMA IS THE PROOF! If the clerks weren’t guilty then Obama would not
sit. American People: Yes he would as 1, Only I have the whole case as only I cut
Obama and Bauer off at the pass, Petition 07-9804, and as 2, The clerks never got
Bush V Gore; the LAWYERS WHO ARE GUILTY brought it in as an emergency stay
to circumvent the clerks thus deny them their rights and obstruct justice. As the only
lawyers in the US who had standing to sue for third party standing are the clerks of
SCOTUS most or all of whom are licensed lawyers and as the only men in the US
who had standing to sue are those same clerks then the SCOTUS clerks were
denied delivery of the paper commission, the suit known as Bush V Gore. If they
handled it they probably would have caught it thus returned it to the bush and gore
lawyers unfiled as it is fiction and as it denied all of us equal protection and due
process unless Bush and Gore stand thus argue pro se or they could have
deliberately injured those lawyers forcing a suit against a single clerk; the clerk
himself then answers as a pro se case of constitutional authority and original

13
jurisdiction testing Marbury V Madison thus making himself legal: The Supreme court
is made law but ‘enshrined’ or ‘ensconced’ in a ruling issued by the Chief Justice not
the constitution thus it answers to The People and so pro se cases then proceed thus
‘lawyer’ is on longer a protected, honored, privileged class so his own job is secure
and he…ascends to the Office of the Executive.

When the clerks rights were violated The People’s were, Justices and clerks being
People, and lawyers did it and are still doing it as I told Taitz and several others that
chain of command is a clerk can do anything to you and it is not a crime unless you
enter SCOTUS itself, say it to their face and prove motivation and intention. No
matter what a clerk does if he pits himself against you then it is constitutional
authority not a crime unless you prove motivation and intention and if you are a
lawyer? You can NEVER prove that as criminal since Bush V Gore was heard and
until Susan V Obama is heard and I, Susan, can prove it is not criminal: I forced this
on purpose, with full knowing and willingness, thus anything that happened to me
even 11/20/08? I meant for it to happen. I crated the parameters making it best or
worst case scenario then argued it both ways plotting who did what to whom and
when knowing that it could not be the clerks fault as one crime was already in
progress when another came at them. At the point of intersection when the clerks
were denied handling Bush V Gore as an appeal from the FL courts, Gore V FL, they
lost the human ability to do anything else but did not know it. Clerks: I know you truly
believe you were choosing your actions in my case but you were not as each time
you or a Justice or both could not know something that I could not yet tell you as no
record existed and as life is proof. As long as I always found at least one willing
person then even if it seems as if some clerks injured another that is not the truth as
until my person, Roberts and Obama were equalized nothing else was ever going to
transpire as it’s physics. As long as I never veered from my course I could prove any
and every action was not criminal, it was not wrong, and actions like 11/20/08
actually helped me thus helped The People as they led Obama to believe he is
invincible thus “expediting” this case: you have to crash and burn before you rise; I
forced us to crash sooner – before physical violence erupted - rather than fall into
WWIII. That EXACTLY as Hitler rose he then rose and exactly as Europe lauded
Hitler he was being lauded. I mistakenly thought I had every answer until the Nobel
Prizes were announced. When even Obama’s closest associates were floored that
Obama now truly believed his own delusion, Obama truly believed that he had ability
and capacity he never had but was flattered into believing he had, I realized I did not
have a few answers such as “If I know how they make the will of the individual
become the will of the crowd, do I know how they then make the liberty of the
individual become indifferent?” and “How did Germany keep ethical Germans inside
its borders so that they could not escape and tell the world?” I did not. And: “What

14
does Norway not know as it has awarded two Nobels, Gore and Obama, in error and
against their own rules?”

I originally phoned my case in as I argued US case law with a SCOTUS clerk named
“Will” or so he said. I NEEDED to hear his truth, as I know the Constitution’s truth as I
lived the case. He told me the truth. Thus I had an injury I could cite against SCOTUS
but then I had to define the parameters to know if it was with motive and intention. I
next called the Military; the Military told me that it would recognize me as the
constitutionally set Commander if I could secure the paper from SCOTUS. That’s not
legal – in the US you need no paper - but then that made it a case of adjudicating the
paper commission thus testing Marbury. I made an attempt to tell the clerks that I
needed to place blame back and forth to then define the parameters and to discover
if the Federal Judiciary was endemically corrupted and maybe criminal but I may
have failed, as I could not tell them they were injured – yet. I soon realized that I
would have to let the injury happen and then I might have to let it escalate to a
Justice due to the process and the process was an issue due to no nonlawyer
arguing before SCOTUS thus paper came to replace People as the government and
as due process itself was denied the clerks. I knew the clerks did not know of their
injury when a lawyer reported that William Suter had taken a vote upon which writ to
issue, as in which to apply for and so ask for. This lawyer said that Suter told him no
writ existed so it is impossible. Correct as this lawyer wanted a writ to then defend
several dead institutions: his license, his law firm, his partner’s dead name, his
partners dead body and then the law itself – the pieces of paper. He had a living
victim but she was his last concern or so I read thus he made it sound as if Suter
actually took a live vote while he was o on the phone waiting. As it did not occur to
Suter to force the test of Marbury I knew that the clerks did not know and perhaps
could not know. I tried to provoke him into knowing by telling him: William Suter, are
you the same Will I spoke to? That Will tried to deny me paper when nobody needs a
writ or the rules. The Chief Clerk does not take popular votes! I could not outright tell
him what I knew or else he would not have insight; he had to have the life experience
of me first that he was denied in BVG. Susan would have told this lawyer, if he ever
told Suter his real reasons thus all of his fact, that “No, YOU can’t have one. YOU
alone may not have a writ. YOU can’t file that case. YOU are the reason.” Hopefully
he would realize that he had TWO clients, his client whose name is on the paper and
then himself, people not paper. Paper is a holdover from our days as a British colony.
So is the bar, the British accreditation registry. I’d make him sue me, a clerk or the
Chief Clerk, to test Marbury thus prove our law is elegant as: first one back to the bar
wins! If it is the American bar, our Declaration and Constitution plus US case law
and so American common law then we are elegant but if it is not – if SCOTUS has
overthrown The People or if a sitting President has - then it is then the Founders
experiment has failed as the Founders said all you NEEDED is one vote.

15
Constitutional authority means you never need to cast an actual vote if you own the
knowledge as your action or life then is the proof. The proof that BVG, Bush’s
installation is Commander, is not legal? 9/11 and the bad declaration of war thus the
war itself as the 9/11 hijackers are Saudis and as I know why it is unconstitutional to
assassinate a foreign leader thus I could have removed Hussein w/o any legal
problem and w/o a war.

As I forced the action on 11/20/08 thus knew it could be either/or but that it was not
guilty I then argued it both ways; I argued it to then gain leverage until I had the
proof. In my world court petition you read that I am arguing for or against, I often say
“guilty” or “innocent” as I had to do that until I had the proof some of which is proof of
life so I had to secure it myself. If I named both extremes, guilty or not, then I could
prove intention and motivation as we lived history and I’m the constant. For instance:
A piece of evidence rising to proof that clerk Clayton Higgins sent me now
exonerates the clerks but in my world court petition as I had not received the Sioux
City judgment it reads that it proves guilt. Later I used it to fool lawyers bent upon
escaping the consequences of their actions. I forced the case to force my own case
as my children and I, The People, are incessantly abused thus I myself volunteered
to suffer some injury but now Obama himself is doing it to me directly and I never
volunteered to suffer at his hands.

I came to know lawyers are at fault as they have injured The People grossly, by
grossly violating the separation of powers and via exploiting expert knowledge plus
they make up almost all judicial seats and ‘craft’ all law – acts, Executive Orders and
signing statements - so we now have a system of lawyers protecting lawyers. No
President has fully understood what he is or is not signing in decades and Congress
does whatever it wants to do thus no checks and balances exist anymore. Eventually
lawyers played their game so many times in courts that even other federal judges
were engaged in actively committing crimes from the bench against the pro se. They
conditioned themselves by reading documents in the third person but never in the
first thus first person pronouns confused them and caused them to deny reality. By
the time I came along? Judges got a shock as I know US law and case law; I know
application. I entered an airtight case and had an answer for every excuse they made
to keep me out unconstitutionally. In my case it was criminal very early on as a judge,
fully aware I had a case of original jurisdiction for the Supreme Court, sent discovery
papers to my house thus acknowledging my case had merit but not realizing: This
judge asked me to issue a motion of discovery against the Justices and clerks thus
The People to then produce: The original Declaration and Constitution. As this judge
and I know the truth of what he did as there are “hidden” facts known only to us – he
made what was not personal then personal due to secure communication meant only
to protect and defend The People especially those who are defenseless I then moved

16
on to SCOTUS all by myself as judges were now creating an impossible Catch-22
situation by openly stating that they would not hear the case because the Supreme
Court would not or never had yet but that they would not send your case ahead. I
entered my own ‘ruling’ and one other; there are hundreds and may be even
thousands but this one names thus exactly blames SCOTUS: SCOTUS may not
make “lawyer” an honored and privileged class and neither may other lawyers as
eventually it will harm SCOTUS thus The People. It did. But before it harmed
SCOTUS? It harmed the US Military, also of The People.

At Petition 09-6777 in November/December 2009 I had to collect more evidence

rising to proof and then go back to Sioux City Iowa as I named it as the one and only
ethical federal court I came across at all in America and so Obama then announced
he was restructuring the federal court system beginning with: Sioux City Iowa. As
Obama and Bauer and every crony knew I was the enemy who could deliver a fatal
blow to them I played them like puppets but they did not know it. They truly believe
I’m their slave but I’m their slave master. I’d write something and enter it and they
react. See my prior complaints and petitions as I wrote “federal judges use my
complaints like they are instruction booklets in how to harm Susan”. I crafted the
recent Sioux City complaint to then end this as at Bush V Gore this game of chess
was over. As US law is elegant all you had to do was know to enter an authority
case; that is then like a super magical square on a chessboard. Ben Franklin found a
super magical square. The knight lands on one square each time eventually leaving
the chess board where he began thus I would make my last move first; I would enter
and exit upon the same square: The Supreme Court as an authority case of original
jurisdiction as once Obama publicly accused and tried and convicted the Justices of
treason and came to have Americans come to truly believe it? As if it really is as fact
and law? I had him, as that would be Obama arguing against the constitution and
against the equal protection and due process clauses. If the Justices are guilty of
treason then the clerks are thus where do you go to adjudicate this? SCOTUS as that
then makes me the defense attorney for The People and the clerks and Justices of
SCOTUS. As I’m the only person in the world who can represent the class then I or
We may proceed. I had to wait upon one last thing: The paper ruling from Sioux City
as the Marshal said it would strike The People from the Constitution thus would serve
as Obama’s written confession for The People as he tried the Justices but denied
them any defense so that The People would be denied any defense and we were: If
you look the Sioux City ruling is also a judgment; the judge who is in default thus
could not issue any ruling against says that the point of law is paper not People, and
even names money, and then when there are no issues or any merit issues a
judgment ordering the clerks to strike it form the record. If there’s no issue why would
you ever go to judgment??? An admiralty court might and if there are no US
Attorneys present and I am not present? This judge means to trick the clerks as they

17
would not know it is an attempt to secure a civil conviction against The People as the
US Marshal told me not them so that he, the Judge, can later blame them via
invoking Marbury when Obama himself ordered this and I can prove it: As soon as
this arrived, after the State of the Union Address in January, I informed The People
that we had been tried and convicted thus stricken from the record. The US marshal
was at my home on or around February 14th, 2010. As soon as he left I informed The
People “I just volunteered to be Obama’s test case”. Then I began my world court
petition as I had to hold the clerks and Justices ‘guilty’ until the paper ruling arrived
thus I had to mail it before the paper ruling arrived to then be able to prove motivation
and intent was not present thus it is not guilty; in this case I, Susan, had to keep
holding you guilty until proven innocent by Obama himself. The legal presumptions
are turned on their heads as we are now a form opposite a Republic. So if you check
the dates and if you know chain of command theory plus that the Post Master
General has special privileges and immunities in this case so you invoked them to
then grant them to SCOTUS and The People then Obama had to issue the order.

Once you deliver the paper into the custody of the post office as The People fund it
and you are acting for The People it is a direct, two party contract. There is no
middleman. It has to be one of two people who cast a legal vote in election 2008. I
had to be acting with pure and absolute intention and motivation; no matter the route
it then takes it HAS to land at Obama as it is now between me, Roberts and Obama.
The chain reaction or chain of causation: If I slug Obama then he will slug Roberts.
Then I go for Obama directly and so Roberts will slug me, he’ll act in defense of the
People, and I go back to SCOTUS. I slugged Obama in December in Sioux City; he
then hit Roberts with the State Of The Union Address; next I slugged Obama
meaning to land on his desk thus he then sent a Marshal to threaten me so I then
entered world court, writing down my special privileges and immunities argument for
the first time thus my motive and intent was purest so Roberts received those
privileges and immunities even if he did not know it…Roberts, w/o any knowledge of
my world court petition, defended himself thus The People by speaking out regarding
Obama’s speech thus paving the way for another SCOTUS filing as I told world court
I would make one last attempt. I proved chain of command theory is law not theory
as the theory is you need no institutions as you can send the idea instead of your
person; ideally you should not need any paper. It’s a matter of physics. Writing it
down caused it to land at Obama exactly, as I had to ensure he would get it as then
we would have proof of life – Obama himself would prove he received it with his own
words. I stated this prediction, my knowledge as I owned it, in my petitions.

Read the Sioux City complaint: I said, As we are now at the adjudication of the
Declaration and Constitution as that is what adjudicating the natural birth clause then
is, put the documents on the back of a truck and drive them out to Sioux City;

18
Roberts can appear and adjudicate them here as Obama and Co. may keep
Washington DC and everything in it as we do not want or need the trappings of
power. I slugged Obama at the back of his knee, a weak spot for any man as but
even weaker for those who are fascists as fascists are wholly unaware of their
environment. I told the court this; I told Obama this yet he still fell for it. I told The
People: A flamingo’s knees are inverted; a flamingo might see you coming thus
mount a better defense but a Nazi can’t. The Sioux City complaint got to him as I
planned as the State of the Union Address and the US Marshal’s action and words
are my proof. First I stood aside Roberts by directly engaging him; then Obama
conspired to attack Roberts at the State of the Union Address as other the Justices
might not appear but Roberts would and usually most Justices do so he could count
upon a few being there like: Samuel Alito and Sandra Sotomayor who I named. He
conspired and then he acted to do it as I named Roberts and the truth as my
price.

Each time any federal agent who harassed me asked me to name my price I named:
John Roberts and the truth. You may ask two Secret Service Agents and a US
Marshal named Mike Sanford. The last US Marshal was not Sanford and I knew it
would not be. But when asked for a reference by the Secret Service I said, John
Roberts. They looked at me; I have two cases on the case conference list; call him. If
I’m wrong why is the Secret Service here asking me about John Roberts? Your proof
is if Obama is natural born and I’m not the constitutionally set President and
Commander then you would not be here asking about Roberts as you’re Secret
Service. You would only be here if I am right and Obama is a foreigner as that then
makes it a stand off between me and Roberts so you’d protect us not Obama. When
US Marshal Mike Sanford asked me what it would take to STOP me from securing
justice (you’re never supposed to stop acting to secure justice or else you’d be
inherently unjust) I said, I need to hear John Roberts tell me that he did or did not
hear the case as that’s proof. I did this as a fascist defines what your price is and
then tries to use it against you; usually they create fear or make you afraid. They also
use bribes. Obama CAN’T go before SCOTUS via due process so I kept naming
“John Roberts” knowing Obama would have to make an attempt to get him thus get
me sooner or later as he had to go through us to overthrow The People.

I did something else too: as I had to prove to The People that Bush V Gore is not
treason on the clerks and Justices part as they do not understand it I then went back
to SCOTUS with 09-6777 naming Roberts and Alito, the two Justices appointed by
Bush. I named them ahead of time – long before Obama attacked them - for several
reasons but one reason is that then The People would have a record they could fact
check. Any person can now go look at the record him or her self thus come to
ownership of the knowledge. I stated that If Bush is not legal then they are not. I told

19
the People within 09-6777: I make Roberts and Alito legal; they make themselves
legal and I make myself legal; we then make each other legal. The Constitution is
reciprocal. The People may not remove them as you truly believed they were legal if
you went before them and your action is the proof according to Marbury. If you were
denied justice? You had other choices such as world court. This was in 2009; so who
did Obama then reach out and touch in January of 2010? Roberts and Alito. I was
able to tell The People this once I mailed out the world court petition so that they
could begin checking the record I have been creating for over three years. It extends
back to 1997 and 1998: I named “unjust taxation” in NY in 1998 as I and other
women are humanly trafficked by the states across state lines in cases of domestic
violence but for the last three years I have been creating it double time and all alone.
I said, It’s proof Obama is running from me. It’s proof they are legal as Roberts went
to the press so that’s correct chain of command theory as he went to The People and
Alito issued the dissenting opinion or so the oppress told me as the press says he
mouthed the words “not true”. Not true? It’s wrong as Obama conspired to do this -
he planned it and it was calculated; he meant to injure The People - and I can and
will prove it. Wrong it is only it is Obama not the Justices, not The People and not
the ruling.

Obama used corporate money to buy the Office as all US dollars are corporate as
the Federal Reserve is a private corporation and Dc incorporated in 1871. So the
Supreme Court says it will level the playing field by allowing corporations to donate
more – The People can do what Obama did – and Obama says the Justices wrongly
decided the case. I, Obama, can and may do it but you may not or you’ll unseat me
and my fascist friends. That’s Barack Obama arguing against the equal protection
and due process clauses exactly as I told him he would have to do; I said, “Do you
know what you’ll have to do? You’ll have to find a way to argue against The
Constitution.” The press ran with it. The Justices are wrong, and The People believed
it as they did not hear it: to wrongly decide a case is treason. Obama made a
mistake:

I, Susan, never said the Justices decided BVG wrongly; I said The People did. In
Petition 07-9804 I supported the Supreme Court plus I had evidence and proof it is
The People: On her talk show Rosie O’Donell said that the absentee ballot she
received was defective and she did not know who she voted for thus warning The
People. Then The People did not vote and then they did not rise up to sue in their
own defense when the election did end up in a court of law. Not one person knew the
difference between absolute and whole numbers or that the chief Justice and
President stand each other down or that the oath of Office reads “I will”. You MAY
accuse a Justice of treason but if you do? That’s moral authority thus vertical checks
and balances thus you are arguing that you are the Chief Justice or the President. If

20
the election itself is in SCOTUS or if the clause you are arguing is natural birth? You
then are arguing you’re the President. you go to SCOTUS; it’s between you, the
Chief Justice and President; you stand aside the Chief Justice and then you stand
down the President for if the chief Justice is not guilty then the President is and WHO
appoints Justices? The President so if it goes past a sitting Chief who began it or did
it, thus a new Chief sits? It has to be the People thus Bush Jr. is not guilty but the
People are responsible. And if Obama used propaganda and assaulted and battered
The People to then assume the Office illegally by denying them informed consent
and even incapacitating them? The People, of which clerks and Justices are, are not
guilty but Obama is guilty. Obama knew In Re Susan sat on the docket; he was
served over and over. An authority case never needs to be heard in person as there
is no argument against it in the case of Marbury or BVG. The math of BVG is wrong.
The Latin of BVG is misleading. Math and Latin are dead; they never change; they
are. It’s why we use math and Latin: you can’t corrupt them. Obama is a
constitutional law professor or so he claims. He read my case and he knew; he
always knew he did not meet natural birth and he was assuming that nobody would
ever know or that if they did they could never prove it. He and his team of lawyers
provided by the Democratic Party mostly deliberately planned this assuming they
were invincible. They not once accounted for the will and liberty of Americans when
the odds are set against them. They never had faith in US law.

I did; I found a 400 year old contract within the Louisiana Purchase that we never had
an opportunity to enforce so it sat on a shelf in Spain unajudicated. This contract
allows Susan to establish an actual allodial title on behalf of the Sioux who have a
rare X gene linking them to China and the trip across the Pacific via Polynesia not the
Bering Strait. I can use the Iroquois to connect us to the people who came across
the strait thus establish the Iroquois Confederacy has its roots in the biblical tower of
Babel story. All four races went their separate ways; only the Iroquois completed the
journey north and down again. The promise The Creator made is that we would all
meet again. The Iroquois Confederacy is our direct legal relative as the Magna Carta
is indirect as it protects the aristocracy; Franklin proposed this with the Albany Plan.
The Confederacy protects The People as you vote and as the checks and balances
go form one person or one vote up into the Office of the Chief. If you follow that one
contract in the LA Purchase backward and forwards you find yourself at The Creator,
as you go through Abraham as this contract is based upon land grant from the King
who got it form the Pope. If you can keep going thus resolve evolution and Uniformity
you then end up at the creation of the universe. This then connects all of us to each
other as I can use it to undo contracts back to the explosion of the Godhead into
time. Allodial title means that you may not make any improvements as The Creator
created it perfect so if you make an improvement allodial title is dissolved. As I’m the
constitutionally set President I can adjudicate all the paper thus give the Sioux their

21
land back but as they do not possess allodial title w/o me? They join the class thus
becoming legal persons under the law and as the land is already a National Park?
They then automatically own it again! A more perfect form? It’s most perfect or
elegant thus I establish man does have sovereignty over the earth and so his own
person; will and liberty is an actual endowment made by God thus we are actually
created equal but biologically distinct as men and women. And guess what?

In an interview Obama answered a question with this: “The LA Purchase is the thing
that will help the earthquake in Haiti.” That’s an actual Freudian slip; it’s a unique
identifier you may apply only to me of all 6 billion people on earth thus Obama
confessed. I can prove this as he said it so everybody heard it plus a fascist can
never be w/o notes or he then tells his truth; he says his actual reasons…the real
reason Obama uses notes all of the time is he can’t have anybody knowing his truth.
It’s not the same as Regan using a speechwriter at all. The US Marshal who
threatened me proved this as he read only three phrases from the paper and then
went to town telling me the truth not what was on the paper. A Freudian slip is deep
not what most Americans think it is. I myself made on in this case: On April 4 th, 2007 I
entered the name Jackson instead of Johnson and was stunned; it scared me. I had
al of this but still did not have one piece: Andrew Jackson taking this part of FL
illegally as that makes my standing to sue perfect. I’m sitting in Jacksonville the city
not realizing the connection in 2008 or even 2009. I said his name and someone said
there’s a statue of old hickory downtown and it hit me: JACKSONville; I lived in New
Orleans; Jefferson knew Spain would not be able to secure FL thus fall into our
hands like ripe fruit. A lawsuit is ripe; I saw the rise of fascism or Hitler ripen in that
stadium in 2004. This suit will ripen when Obama attacks Roberts thus The
People directly.

More proof is: The action taken on 11/20/08 seems to be a crime. Is it? The Officers
created an impossible standard for the clerks and Justices by defaulting on 11/05/08
and by colluding to pass Resolution 511 thus making the ballot wholly criminal as
then the two major party candidates sponsored it and/or were the subject of it and
were violating natural birth thus targeting women as well as the clerks and Justices
as it would have to be heard in SCOTUS. It is a legislative action from which women
cannot escape as one of those persons then would become the President thus never
side with women if it meant they must leave office to hear the case for equality. They
defaulted with deliberation and at least two of them are lawyers, Clinton and Obama
so they knew exactly what they were doing but exploited their knowledge regardless.
So I created my own standard in The People’s defense: I made it DIFFICULT for the
clerks or Roberts to act to file the paperwork: I had John Roberts and I, as Thomas
Jefferson, traipsing through PUERTO RICO looking for the Chupacabra in an
attachment as it is about belief versus true belief and life as proof – people are the

22
proof - and as I was targeting but not unjustly Sandra Sotomayor as Obama and his
cronies are out to corrupt the Court so needed to target her as she places Hispanic
above American and I knew it. The same fireman issue she had before her we had in
Jacksonville only in reverse. As her ruling was going to be overturned Obama
targeted her for reasoning: To make her seem to be stupid and incapable and to
make her look like a racist thus causing dissent among The People and between The
People and the Court. So I beat him to the punch naming PUERTO RICO or
Hispanic as I witnessed kids who identify with Hispanic place themselves last when
they were asked what others thought about them and what they thought about their
own person. As Obama must do something to shake the faith of The People but at
the same time create a you versus they attitude he would choose Hispanic and a
person who is a judge who had a case coming before SCOTUS. Every person has
been saying Obama will seat more Justices then any other President thus the
fascists need to keep him in power to do what they want to do. When he named
Sotomayor? I could then use her name to prove him guilty by entering my
foreknowledge and knowledge of this issue to world court.

I was especially harsh in the world court petition as I said “Sandra Sotomayor” is the
worst, most dangerous thing that ever happened to those firemen. I also said people
are people; they aren’t right or wrong. I meant that an idea was the worst thing: If you
can’t achieve then nobody can. I told the world court about the SCOTUS case re is
Hispanic a class the same as white thus is TX guilty of school segregation? When
Obama named the LA Purchase he was naming Hispanic as: De Soto marched
across New Mexico. Before New Mexico it was Mexico thus Hispanics were present
when the golden spike was driven into the tracks of the transcontinental railroad
connecting all four races once again. I was raised in Troy, NY, home of Uncle Sam
who got his name by stamping property of the US on meat. Obama truly believes we
have “property of US” stamped on your forehead; do you or is property of the US
stamped upon your heart?

Obama’s answer to the reporter was more than telling; it made no sane or rational
sense so I had another answer: to break the will of the individual you must get them
to begin doubting their own sanity. Then the individual begins rationalizing and
justifying their words and actions; they deny reality as ethical Germans did. When
The People heard Obama they began talking about it; they said they knew they
elected a “lunatic” but what was wrong with the reporter for not asking Obama what
in the world his words meant? At last a person said: No matter how I rearrange his
words and no matter how I define these words they make no sense at all. Can
somebody please tell me what these words might mean as I can’t make any sane or
rational sense out of them? That’s how it is done; do it over and over so much
everyone begins to deny reality including the press and then when no person

23
supports the dissenters even the dissenters give up. Indifference sets in. and in the
US as the US Marshal’s service keeps you from leaving the country then it would
stop me from leaving so the ethical Germans that wanted to leave could not. I caught
this person; I posted that he or she might want to look at a lawsuit on the SCOTUS
docket that was posted online; he or she could read the suit. I said Obama might be
referring to this lawsuit as a part of it revolves around the LA Purchase and Jefferson.
I did not tell this person what Obama meant; all he needed to know is that in
Obama’s world those words did make sense. I knew but he was going to have to
figure it out for himself: Didn’t Obama try to condition The People via use of
Jefferson’s image? And if I designed a lawsuit so that he had to see it as it then went
to him, it landed at his desk, and I have been in two earthquakes and I referred to
myself as an earthquake then if Obama said this he had to be claiming ownership of
the knowledge even it was a Freudian slip. Obama purchased the election thus
purchased The People and so sold us into slavery via Marxism, a philosophy of
business not government. He can’t get around I, Susan, the person who entered the
LA Purchase so can’t help the world as I can and will as I knew our American destiny
thus our fate had indeed manifested at long last.

The Obama birther conspiracy theory? A conspiracy is or is not; there’s no such thing
as a conspiracy theory. Is Obama sitting as President when he is not constitutionally
set at all in any way? Yes so the conspiracy is. You may have a conspiracy
hypothesis. My “Obamacare” conspiracy hypothesis? “Obamacare” is a ten trillion
dollar ransom note.

Congress truly believes we are property. Recently it sold us into slavery with the
healthcare scam. 18 states are already suing. I can save them some money:
Congress used reconciliation to insert a right into our law as they can’t pass an
amendment naming it as a right. It’s not possible to reconcile unless you first concile.
Congress has yet to act conciliatory after declaring war based upon bad evidence. I
pre-empted Congress: About 8 months ago I, the constitutionally set President and
Commander, convened the lawful, constitutionally set government of The People. We
were in congress at the library. You may fact check this with meetup.com and the
Beaches Library. I posted public notice: The issue is Edmund Burke’s “Conciliation
with the Colonies” – People as a dollar amount - and we might answer this question;
“Is Thomas Jefferson a right wing conservative nut?” as The People do not know
English words have an old usage and a modern usage. Latin never changes. Thus if
Congress uses reconciliation to pass healthcare after BVG, after a war they declared
wrongly and after they installed Obama? They are voting to suspend the rules or:
voting to suspend the Presidential vote. Edmund Burke said: “All that is
necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing.”

24
The Congress has voted to suspend the vote and it did it after Obama attacked the
Justices with Congress sitting as judge and jury. Congress is a fabricated criminal
venue and that action was meant to convince thus indoctrinate The People so that
they truly believed they are helpless and powerless. Hopeless. John Roberts went to
The People; Alito issued the dissenting opinion and…as this is the second time in his
life that false criminal charges were pressed against him in a fabricated venue
Thomas’ wife announced she would form a political party or so I legally presume as
this time Thomas could not defend himself so she did as he was gagged like Benson
of Benson V US found within and attached to my Sioux City lawsuit. I wrote “clear
and present danger” on it, as that is absent from the ruling. It’s a civil conviction. Why
gag him? So nobody would know the truth as the federal judge and US Attorney/s
involved would have no salary if the truth was let loose. The truth is that judge and
the involved US attorneys had several other choices. They never had to go here as if
organized tax collector’s who are robbing you are your legal problem as they are now
a mob who has seized all power then can and may you yourself organize and so
collect money – taxes – by selling your knowledge in a kit? You may give your
knowledge away as the Founders set the precedent or you may entice a citizen to
sue you thus take you to the Supreme Court by selling an empty box but can and
may you sell the knowledge of the original documents that you possess? This
constituted a court of admiralty as Benson’s lawyer was not allowed to mount any
defense; I truly believe that Jefferson introduced the idea of the Seventh Amendment
to prevent courts of admiralty from trying and convicting us civilly without any jury and
w/o the opportunity to mount a defense. Thomas and Scalia should know as they are
originalists: Is the original intent of The Constitution and Bill of Rights to deny us
rights or grant us rights? I did not bother to look to see if the correct flags were flying
but regardless we may have another point of law on our hands: Law of the Sea as
this speech was broadcast internationally and as we know Canada and Britain were
and are harmed by the war, a war Obama had a part in declaring and that he then
never addressed as he let the bad declaration stand thus sent People off to die in
defense of a dead institution of government without any named reason or cause.
“Weapons of mass destruction” was found to be false; later it was discovered that VP
Cheney with ties to Halliburton had placed false and misleading stories in the New
York Times as the New York times reporters admitted they did what he asked and
the evidence thus proof was and is documented and: we found no nuclear
capabilities in Iraq.

I filed a case in SCOTUS that cuts these guys off at the pass every single time. Every
time; they can’t defeat The People as it is physics but they will wear themselves out
trying, or so I told my Secretary of Defense who is constitutionally set as he knows
his stuff and so I hired him, “I can’t wait for them to argue a SCOTUS case in front of
Congress”. Obama as judge and the members of Congress as the jury. Who will

25
believe this as Obama could have entered an Americus brief which he never would
as he’s no friend of the People, filed as a third party which he is as he’s a fascist,
entered the court as the case himself again which he is as he’s not natural born,
and/or issued an Executive Order which Obama can’t as he’s not the legal,
constitutionally set President: I, Susan, am. You can’t order yourself installed. You
can never get around me as I moved SCOTUS with an Executive Order I issued thus
I claimed ownership of the knowledge. By denying The People the protection of the
law? You are denying them the benefits of their labor or violating Article 1 Section 8
as I copyrighted it in their name not my own.

Federal Office holders may enter SCOTUS directly, presumably in defense of The
People. Do you know how hard I was laughing when I realized that THE MEMBERS
OF CONGRESS AND OBAMA PLUS ALL OF HIS LAWYERS DO NOT KNOW
THIS? Are you an Officer of the Court or Voter? An officer of the Legislative or a
Voter? I told my Secretary of Defense: USC 1331, the Voter must go through the
federal appeals court, is against the law of physics. Contracts are between two
parties not three. In this entire universe there is no third party contract; it’s a false
appearance. Trust me: even the trinity is not a third party contract. Even President,
Commander and Chief Justice is not a third party contract.

The law seemed impossible to enforce; I went to the Department of Justice working
chain of command. Now politicized and stocked with Obama appointees I could not
move one employee to act upon even my smallest complaint all of which are
supported by proof. I asked: Did you know of a case named US v Nixon? Since when
do you work for Obama and not The People? I, Susan, the constitutionally set
President and Commander, work for The People thus you work for The People not
for me. Our repeated petitions fell upon deaf ears. This is the endemic corruption the
Founders warned us about as Officers shirked their duties and we rose up as a
society like France until we are taxed to death as the debt accrues without any relief
and as Marxism has caused a confluence and so class of businessmen and
politicians to form and the businesses are being suckered as this always results in
the politicians making out like bandits via bribes while the businessmen begin to fail
until government owns everything thus you have a politburo or “political bureau”.
Marxists, Fabians - they all fail as they can’t pay the bribes eventually but
businessmen are convinced they themselves are the one time such philosophies will
succeed. It’s egomania. As businesses are The People I had to defend them too:
About three years ago I discovered a law of this universe that makes it impossible for
China to carry out its nuclear threat; China then could not act to seize American
business interests but if it did we would have lots of options. Thus I informed North
Korea. North Korea then tested Obama and he failed; Obama awarded us to North
Korea as Clinton went there to secure the release of hostages and Clinton like it or

26
not is an ex-President so that action asserts or implies sovereignty is not ours. What
do we have a Secretary of State for? No ex-President should be acting in this
capacity especially if he committed perjury while under oath in a court of law as he
then injured The People. I have news for The People, just and unjust: Guilty? Even if
the piece of paper does not exist you are guilty if motive and intent to cause harm
exists and “guilt” happens to be a state of being and a legal designation.

Guilt: Obama and all in his employ wanted us to focus on Hawaii and his mother
when that is not the correct application of the law. Paper would make it procedural
not substantive due process and as for informed consent? We were not denied it as
Obama changed his name to Obama from Barry Sotero and then ran around telling
us his father is Kenyan. He wrote a whole book about it. He then claimed to be a dual
citizen of Britain and America and that his British citizenship expired. Under US law
there is no such thing; that is a foreign idea and concept plus if you are a citizen of
another nation? You must act to renounce your citizenship. In or around 1978 Kenya
left colonial rule; under Kenyan law you cannot be a dual citizen so you chose and
Obama chose Britain. I took the liberty of asking the Queen and The British People if
they had a letter on file from Obama and they said No. I’m still waiting on the
Queen’s answer. From a note I posted to The People:

“Father is the only parent you ever had to consider in the case of Barack Obama.
What the unjust men sitting in the offices do is test you by violating the law; they sit
back to measure your reaction. Every time you allow this you become their willing
victims. In the case of Barack Obama? The Officers got a surprise as they assumed if
no person had ever sued the Judiciary and/or if no person had ever accessed
SCOTUS directly it is because it is impossible. They had no idea how to do it and so
REFUSED to acknowledge the truth: Susan Herbert kicked their ass across the floor
of SCOTUS which is why they now cannot and may not enter SCOTUS at all, on
paper or in person: They will be arguing that they are guilty of criminal activity.
“Natural birth”, the right to become elected to the Office of President and Commander
and to then sit in or as the Office of President and Commander and to then act as the
Office of President and Commander is an enumerated, protected right. It is a
BIRTHRIGHT thus a right like no other. It is not a benefit of citizenship. “Benefits”
are not rights; in Ngyuen v Naturalization and Immigration the Supreme Court
decided that if your mother and father is foreign but you are born here then the
benefit of citizenship goes to the mother. Correct but I know more or other reasoning
that is stricter than the reasoning SCOTUS gave. Now all you need to know to take
care of Obama and Company is that by “benefits” SCOTUS intended such things as
Social Security or Food Stamps. Think about it: What do you gain by being a citizen
of the US? The vote; and what do you vote upon? Legislation, as your vote elects the
candidates who will then pass legislation which determines how your taxes are spent

27
which in turn then funds programs such as the food stamp program. Now: Are food
stamps a benefit? Yes; are they an entitlement? No as our Founders named nothing
as an entitlement except: NATURAL BIRTH AS IF YOU ARE BORN INTO THE
CONSTITUTION OR NOT. Our Founders exactly and specifically stated that they
never, ever intended to make direct payments to the citizens. That makes perfect
sense as once a government does that then you, the voter who is the government,
are making direct payments known as tribute to the Officers. The Officers then may
take from you against your will and give it to another. As this can only happen if you
no longer have the vote it is a slippery slope that you embark upon but do not know
as the appearance is deceiving: If you go to a poll and vote and it seems as if you do
then “elect” Officers how could your vote not be? Easy: It is negated, ignored or
denied by the Officers until you have a Presidential election decided by SCOTUS. To
set all of this in motion the very first event that must transpire is The People fail to
reason their vote and later fail to cast a vote. Your vote if you are natural born then is
an executive Order; would you, a voter, casually issue any old Executive Order? No,
so why vote any old way? If you do then all an Officer has to do is reason and decide
he or she has a willing victim on his or her hands thus they will make an attempt to
test you, to injure you, and if you do not protest or do not put up a fight to the very
best of your ability then they know: We have a prisoner; a slave. US case law has
always been if your father is natural born then you are. The argument has always
raged over whether or not the electorate being composed of land owners who then
ultimately ‘elect’ the President via the college is discriminatory. Once you reason and
apply the equal protection clauses correctly to both sexes, equal but distinct as men
do not give birth to humans who ARE then the government and ARE Presidents, then
you realize that by tracing lineage or natural birth to the Father but the benefit to the
Mother then what the founders gave us is an elegant dance that, stemming from your
one vote no matter what sex you are all the way up to the Office of President and
Commander, stacks your power and authority in such a way it is leveraged back and
forth creating what the ancient Chinese refer to as The Impossible Balance. As in
checks and balances. If you do this correctly, if you perfect it thus live it out as real
via living your American life thus claiming ownership of the wisdom the Founders
gifted to us which then the wisdom of every human that was, is or will be, then you, a
Natural Born American Citizen can and will Square the Circle. “Squaring the circle” is
said to be an impossible geometric problem as what a mathematician is attempting to
do is ‘force’ the area of a circle inside a square to then equal the area of that square.
Equal? Exactly the same? No two people are exactly the same as we are equal but
distinct and then unique. It’s a matter of equivalency and so you or your vote is an
amount of energy that has mass not weight. The impossible balance is that perfect
balance of will and liberty, a DIVINE ENDOWMENT, so that you then feel the sacred
experience within US law that is then America. Cast your vote perfectly based upon
the lessons you learn living your American life via your mistakes with an actual

28
mistake being one time only? You come to claim ownership of this knowledge:
Everlasting life. We can spend all day arguing as to what “everlasting life” is or is not.
All words are symbols. Part of it is the actual emotion and physical sensation of the
unconditional love the Creator has for you. I know what the actual national treasure -
the sacred experience contained within America - is as I claimed it. It’s up to you to
claim it for yourself and it’s my theory that you will prove to be a law of this universe
or not that as we are unique that this experience will be unique for each one of us.
Thus: how can I ever tell you what your experience of life is? I can’t tell you that; you
must tell me that. Your thoughts, feelings, ideas and beliefs are your own; they are
facts of you, that exact voter. The Constitution? The Founders dictated nothing to
you; you do not have to do anything you do not want to do as an American is a
person, a People, who volunteers. I’m no dictator; I’m a President and Commander. I
volunteered to be the very first pro se case of constitutional authority and original
jurisdiction that overturns another thus commandeers The People and puts the
traitors, usurpers and enemies away. Who decides the fate of the crooks among us?
THE PEOPLE either as voters, juries or candidates. THE PEOPLE not The Officers
are the government. It is not “they the officers” versus you or us. We are all to be on
the same side; in SCOTUS you are not to enter seeking to win or lose. We, The
People, are for the Declaration and Constitution. It’s self-evident: The sitting Officers
have no idea they are people, equal to the rest of us. Distracting you with Obama's
mother so then a paper birth certificate was a nasty tactic but it was also a fatal self-
inflicted wound as believe it or not the lawyers, politicians, bankers, privateers and
crooks had no idea that in America LIFE not paper is the proof! They truly believed
with their entire greedy, tiny, black hearts that WE THE PEOPLE are a paper chase. I
said, the concept not the exacting words, "Dear Traitors, Idiot Lawyers and Various
Other Sundry Crooks: Show me the piece of paper that has red hair growing out of its
head as I have yet to see it. I own the knowledge that life is proof as a guy named
Thomas Jefferson wrote "A Summary View" after he was exposed to the Iroquois
Confederacy most likely by Franklin’s Albany Plan and that then became our
Declaration and Constitution which was authored by a group of people including guys
named John Adams and Alexander Hamilton and this in turn led to a court ruling
known as Marbury thus the creation of SCOTUS as we know it today after they all
lived it...now, you are lawyers and attorneys or so you falsely claim: Do you truly
believe that the pieces of paper wrote themselves? You might as you are the same
unjust persons who insist that US law is based upon or directly derived from the
Magna Carta. Fact of history: The Magna Carta protects the rights of the
ARISTOCRACY NOT THE PEOPLE. The Iroquois Confederacy is older and protects
the rights of The People; it is uniquely AMERICAN thus it can't be the Magna Carta
no matter how many nasty word tricks you use. Like I legally claimed: Buffoons; as
remedy and relief these unjust persons should not be allowed to refer to themselves
as professional crooks." The five year case law applied to women as in if you live

29
here for five years then you are entitled to the benefits of citizenship? The reasoning
behind that is a child develops its sense of morals or a conscience by age four thus if
you are here for five years you are likely to place the ideals contained in US law
within your child. Custody of The People belongs to the mother while custody of the
Military belongs to the father thus custody of the Government and so safety belongs
to THE PEOPLE. US law is both absolute and whole at the same time. It
takes fathers and mothers to create a People.” – From An Letter to The People; I
ordered The People to disseminate it and to reason it for their own selves.

I have the satellite coordinates of a person who saw Obama’s grandmother say he
was born in Kenya and then saw her silenced; he is not on a time delay so he
witnssed this event live. I entered these coordinates to the court with his testimony. I
entered a report by a dectective that is very thorugh detailing the facts as he found
them to be; he was not hired to make a case either way. He discovered Hawaii is
now changing its birth certificates in such a way it makes Obama’s COLB seem to be
thus the truth when the one the Obama camp brougth forth states AFRICAN under
father. Why would anyone fight so hard to hide a piece of paper if he is innocent? To
deny The People informed consent? HA officials have said they are under court
order not to release any of the paper. Because: The Hawaiian birth certifcate does
not exist – it is not legally relevant for natural birth to then claim a birthright,
qualification to sit and act as the President and Commander, and only legally relevent
as to whether or not Obama has been committing voter fraud all of these years but
Obama wants and needs you to believe it does exist and does make or break the
case. It was and is deliberate: These unjust persons make Hawaii doubt itself. Under
pressure The People of Hawaii includign the Officers will then begin to act as if they
too are unlawful when in reality they are vicims of domestic violence and of a
conspiracy, ap lot, to overthrow The People by making it impossible for a woman or
the ethical to assume the Office of Executive; to deny all women thebn means to
deny all people and in this case you target the ethical. People of Hawaii, your paper
was fine the way it was; you don’t need to change it:

For good measure I looked up if HA, Alaska and AZ ever had constitutionally set
Senators as Congress admits changing the law to make their appointment direct, by
the Governor, is a disaster that corrupted the Senate as special interests took over
as a result. “Special interests” are never constitutional. As Alaska and Hawaii were
not yet states prior to the ratification of the amendment, their admission to the Union
simply required their adherence to the Constitution in its already-amended form, at
the time of their admission to The People in 1959. Thus they never did and so are
denied equal protection and due process as the opporuntiy never existed for them as
it never existed for women. Florida, my state and home of BVG, never ratified this
amednment. See my invocation of Rigths as a citizen of FL and the US submitted to

30
the FBI on or around Declember 22nd, 2006. See the account of my conception in St.
Augustine, FL. Several advocates of federalism have called for the Seventeenth
Amendment's repeal. Former U.S. Senator Zell Miller of Georgia said this from the
Senate floor: “Direct elections of Senators … allowed Washington’s special interests
to call the shots, whether it is filling judicial vacancies, passing laws, or issuing
regulations.” Economist Thomas DiLorenzo has said the Seventeenth Amendment as
“one of the last nails to be pounded into the coffin of federalism in America.” In 2009,
Senator Feingold of Wisconsin and Representative Dreier of California proposed an
amendment to remove the power of governors to directly appoint Senators. On
March 11, 2009, a joint hearing was held between the Senate and House
subcommittees on the Constitution regarding S.J. Res. 7 and H.J. Res. 21. As a
Senator from IL not HA – carpetbagging is not constitutional as it may be in line with
state code or rule but not US law - Obama missed every single major vote upon
controversial issues eventhough he is a law school graduate thus should be able to
reason these issues easily. Missing every major vote is deliberate: He does not want
any person to know how his true beliefs; he can’t have anyone knowing as a fascist
can’t do that. A fascist adopts the will of the group thus adopts their stated ‘beliefs’;
then he or she loses the human ability to be truthful thus Scalia is correct: These
guys can’t look him in the eyes when they argue. Scalia advised them to do so; they
can’t if they are lying or if they have incapacitated themselves by perpetrating the
injury so many times and to such a large extent and degree. Or: Obama is no legal
expert, he’s not a lawyer, thus he can’t reason these constitutional issues. If he is not
a lawyer but falsely claimed to be one? [It’s possible; I could not find any classmate
or student who remembered Obama and in NY a woman was caught paying an
imposter to take all of her courses and exams for her thus the woman held a diploma
and a license but the imposter owned the knowledge and expertise; the guilty woman
was caught as people who worked with her knew she was no expert.] I hold no law
license so the playing filed is still leveled and I can and will reason these issues for
IL. Obama owes the state of IL a lot of money as he agreed to do a job and then did
not show up for work. What is our proof of life for or against Obama and the Officers?

Obama is the unjust man who began with the highest popularity rating of all time and
he then took the biggest tumble of all time. Yes, as every ‘promise’ is a lie; it is
propaganda meant to ding at your emotional center as that’s Hitler’s big lie. Millions
of persons who are black have been severely disappointed. I entered one who
named the hidden racism afoot: Jessmyn McCanick. Obama told me with his own
mouth and own words that he plotted, planned and deliberated; that he coveted this
office so much that he threatened me – the US Marshal could not know the details of
my complaints or complex concepts and application of US law that he named and I
previously confirmed that the injury was pre-existing within the US Marshal’s Service
- but Obama could - and before then on his very first day in office as a state Senator

31
he went up to the person who ran the show and said: “I’m told you’re the person I
want to see if I want to become the President”. This person then went on to become
Obama’s campaign manager. Obama’s campaign manger told this story to the
press; Obama confirmed it: some how, some way Obama became the President on
the floor of the IL State Senate. The Democratic Party leaders all knew. Then in 2008
they come up with Resolution 511 that resolves to violate the rights of all humans not
only Americans and that is on the floor of…the US Senate. See Harry Reid; Harry
Reid’s own words confirm it: “The voters will accept a light skinned black” - but not a
woman? Opportunity, means, motive and intention. Willful, knowing and deliberate.
Am I witnessing legal German precision engineering in action? As in lawyers who
ARE German precision engineers? I truly believe I am as I entered my evidence and
proof to the world court: I first witnessed this personality type or criminal behavior and
how this then effects its victims, how the injury is realized as the victims do not
realize they become victimizers when they give in to the criminals thus give up on
their own persons, in Philadelphia 1997. In defense of The People of Hawaii within
the Sioux City complaint I told Obama and every unjust person in his employ
as they do not work for The People: “Prove you’re natural born? You can’t
even establish it.”

There is something else Obama cannot do: Command. If you can’t command then
you can’t preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, The People. He proved it –
life is proof - by going before Congress to charge the Justices and clerks as they
summarized the case for the Justices with deciding a case wrongly. He did this as I
told Obama that you must issue the order out loud as that is chain of comand
theory; it’s not enough to write it down on paper. I did not hear him issue the order
for roberts to stand down or even aside plus he has to let Roberts mount a defense
as that defense then is a defense mounted on behalf of The People. Roberts must
have an opportunity to stand Obama aside or down and Roberts…stood Obama
aside as did Alito leaving my person remaining. So now it is between me and
Obama and Commanding. It’s not humanly possible for Obama to command as to
do that you must be able to repair chain of command by uniting the two offices in
one and that person? It has to be a voter who rises to power via their one vote alone
thus no money must change hands and that voter must be indepepdnet of any
political party. When the Jax district Federal Court wanted money (and other federal
court benches used money, the fees, to try and keep me, a poor person, out) I wrote
“tribute” across the money order and the Federal government known as the Officers
cashed it thus proving my claim for me. To command in this way, as both offices in
one person, you must be able to invoke moral authority and Obama cannot. You
must be able to access chain of comamnd at the lowest levels and then ascend both
chains; you must be able to cast the idea of your person f without paper or any other
institution up both chains as it will go from person to person or to your ‘target’

32
directly thus landing at the sitting President and Commander. Currenlty the chain is
severed beneath that person so it rises only so far but then reverberates back down
thus domestic violence is now endmeic in the Military. But as I entered SCOTUS
with 07-9804 this is possible for me once I ‘lap’ myself as I recently did with my last
Federal court and world court filings. As the case is equality this person has to be a
woman and a nonlawyer as I am. If any man does this before a woman does then it
is not a Republic you are experiencing but a Military dictatorship. The Navy told me
that only I could do this as each time I accessed the chain I landed beyond Mayport,
in DC at the Pentagon, so I knew then that I am this SCOTUS case. This is because
I was approached by victim shopping lawyers wanting me to be their victim in a
SCOTUS suit so they could then deafeat the Military but I declined as that’s a
violation of the spirit of our law; how many women and children were suffering
abjectly as they did not make ‘good victims’? plus – who’s out ot ‘defeat’ the US
Military? It’s my pure and absolute legal standing: My legal unborn person, myself
as a natural born voter and my unborn son, now age 13.

I took out both chains; I accessed SCOTUS and then went back to the Joint Chiefs. I
had to enter SCOTUS first to then be the wall or chain between SCOTUS and
Obama and then The People and Obama; I had to stand between The People and
harm. The Military rises from The People so going to SCOTUS first protected them
as Clinton abandoned his command via his perjury. I had to pit myself agaisnt
whoever won the 2008 election, ensuring The People’s faith was not shattered and
the fascists were stopped by blocking the only road into Dodge and the only road out
of Dodge. Then I had to shut down any pathways around SCOTUS and/or The
People. I marched into the Pentagon on paper; I made an appointment to speak to
Mike Mullen to then issue the Order. I introduced myself as the constitutional
authority case of original jurisdiction which entered directly known as SCOTUS
Petition 08-6622, In Re Susan Herbert. He was: Out of the country. That’s an actual
reason; it’s the intrinsic force at work and so the only thing the guy who answered the
phone sounded surprised at? Nobody told me before I called. I then did not call back
for reasoning: I could fake Obama out with Mullen’s name by insinuating possible
guilt as only Obama is out of the country or alien to our law thus is unlawful. I told
Obama: “I told you that you could not keep any piece of paper on Earth from me. But
I lied in self-defense when I told that I NEEDED to know what building it was in; the
Joint Chiefs? Guilty of treason or so I implied? YOU, Obama, fell for MY ruse. Your
clue: Like I'm gonna accuse, truly and really accuse, the Joint Chief himself by
name of treason and then waltz in the front door as the actual Commander. Barry
Sotero: You my friend are cheaper than I ever imagined. Ready? YOU need to be
afraid of being taken into military custody not me. British military custody as for you it
is...HIGH TREASON.”

33
High treason: First, DE is the first state, the first vote, as it is the first state to ratify the
Constitution in December 7th, 1787 in 07-9804 in 2007. Pearl Harbor Day. What else
is special about DE? The Delaware are a group of American Indians whose name
means The People and taxes as businesses incorporate there for reasoning:

Proof if Britain needs it: Joe Biden plagiarized a British citizen; did you know in the
US if you are convicted of plagiarism you might be subject to arrest upon re-entry to
the US as the US Marshal’s may possess a warrant for your arrest? Biden admitted
he committed a crime like Clinton but was never prosecuted for it. As Biden and I
know the laws regarding what you can and can’t say or can and can’t claim in Britain
versus America are not the same Biden had reason to target Britain: It is not likely a
British citizen will ever have the human ability to sue him for damages. Biden never
suffered any consequences for his actions and he thinks he “got away” with it as we’d
be too stupid to know he ripped off a British speech thus violated an inviolate honor
bond but then claimed it is own work as if he wrote it not as if he “mistakenly”
sounded similar. He said: I plagiarized the work; he said It wasn’t a mistake. It’s an
actual conspiracy as Biden is from Delaware, our first state and as admitted criminals
then may not act as the Executive or any part of it by its very nature as that then is
foreign. “Delaware” is an important fact: If you go to Delaware you will find that they
have no sales tax and that even though Delaware is a very small state most large
corporations incorporate there – their business headquarters are in Delaware - due to
those very same tax laws as it is extremely profitable for your company to operate
out of Delaware as opposed to other states as your business taxes are dependent
upon where your business headquarters physically is. It’s about the corporate trust
as a legal entity not actual people. So then: Biden rips off a British citizen thus
violating the honor bond and then is forced upon Great Britain and America against
its will and the next thing you know Kraft purchases Cadbury against the will of the
British People? I need to act; as Queen Elizabeth and I are the same she must not
know about Delaware. Biden’s “election” was and is rigged; it is not a legal election
and not an actual election at all as he was installed by those same privateers. Joe
Biden was planted, plain and simple. Proof the British people are anything but stupid:
An “ordinary” British citizen alerted me to the Kraft deal and said he felt as if it was
“odd”. The People on both coasts in both nations caught Joe Biden and all of these
political cronies. I, Susan, am no slouch when it comes to defending Great Britain as
I have a duty and an obligation: I listen to the BBC every once in while on my satellite
radio to then know as fact what The British People think, feel and believe about
“America” and themselves.

The first time I came to own knowledge regarding Joe Biden’s plans? October, 2005.
I was in Palm Beach, FL. A person and I were on a conference call with a man
hundred of miles away and I heard him say, “Maslov” as in Abraham Maslov. That’s a

34
private joke as he means Maslov’s pyramid of self-actualization and so the Founders
pyramid. After we hung up she said that she heard him say “Biden, that Joe Biden
recommended” the business. That made no sense at all as I would not take a
recommendation regarding my life and death from anyone. I went to a lecture, an
actual lecture this place held, about the nature of design. The lecturer talked about
nuclear physics, the atom and US law; he said that The Declaration is one of only
three pieces of perfect writing in English but he meant the symbols only not the
structure. A 26 word sentence was another perfect piece of writing. Weeks later I
witnessed someone doing something very American and everyone was annoyed; I
was shocked. I asked “Why?” and the person said, “Biden.” I said, “What are you
talking about? Why do you keep saying Joe Biden?” She said, “No, Frank Biden,
Joe’s brother.” She said that the guy was the same guy who gave the lecture; I did
not know. Then she said something else: “Joe Biden is trying to hide his brother in
FL as he has plans to sit as the Vice President.” Normally I would not take this
seriously as there’s nothing wrong with Frank and it sounds like silly rumor BUT: This
is Palm Beach County and its FL, home of BVG. I entered my knowledge of BVG to
the court record. Was this a serious threat? I asked the business. Employees
confirmed it. I went back to the person who said “Maslov”: “You said Maslov or so I
thought. She heard Biden. Is there any way you might have said Biden?” He said
yes, it was possible; “Where did you see his name? How would you connect his
name to this business?” Remember, he like me had no idea Frank Biden was here. I
did not say a first name. He said Joe Biden’s name was on a website connected to
this business. I told these people that they were nuts; that Joe Biden had a big secret
to hide and it was not Frank but he, himself: A conspiracy is afoot as I know a lot of
People who’s agenda it is to become President but only one whose agenda it is to
become Vice President: Dick Cheney thus a crime was already in progress and
Biden was a part of it as Joe Biden is no Dick Cheney.

SCOTUS: If I told you this in 2007 would you have believed me? The People did not
want to believe it at first as it was so ugly; they wanted to avoid the painful emotions
associated with having been a part of it. I can produce hundreds of witnesses, as
they did not put the pieces of the puzzle together as they did not know BVG for what
it is. Everything about this was wrong including the fact that they truly believed Frank
Biden was involved. The Frank Biden I met that one time? He said DC was a
cesspool and he would never go there again as in be a DC insider; the person I knew
then was not a person who would ever engage in a negative contract at all. He
knows contracts; he was very much for America and US law; if anything Joe Biden
had to be worried people would compare him to Frank and so know he, Joe, is a not
fit to serve.

35
Proof my opinion of Joe Biden is applicable as he was served and knew of my
personal plight as well as the plight of all US women and children: My claim has
always been that in the cases of women and children not only is their vote negated
but that they are trafficked across state lines and even sold to the highest bidder in
family courts as domestic violence is denied and ignored in the courts; the reality
women live is denied thus men and Officers traffic them rather than solve the
problem. State and federal funds allow this to occur without relief; the system and the
mistaken belief men possess about women being lesser, weaker and defective and
proffer as actual reality when it is not makes this the only way for women to escape
the problem thus the men who harm them rarely suffer at all. Now we routinely
witness male politicians who have targeted women rise to the highest officers of
power. Many claim to be “experts” in the cases of women when that is a façade,
manufactured for the sole purposes of hoodwinking The People The very application
of the equal protection and due process clauses that was applied to interstate bus
travel is being denied women as only men who are black ever received equal
protection of the law as proven by Obama’s installation as the foreignization of the
Executive makes women less than forever as it denies them from any and all
protection of the law: Obama has now acted to harm me rather than accord women
their rights by appearing in a court of law as has Joe Biden:

“WASHINGTON - Legislation that will protect victims trafficked across and within our
borders, introduced by Senators Sam Brownback (R-KS) and Joseph R. Biden, Jr.
(D-DE), today passed by vote of 17-2 out of the Judiciary Committee. The William
Wilberforce Trafficking Victims Protection Reauthorization Act, S. 3061, a four year
reauthorization act, comprehensively strengthens and improves existing laws to
prevent and prosecute human trafficking, as well as offers protection and services to
victims of human trafficking. According to the most recent State Department report,
roughly 800,000 individuals are trafficked each year, the overwhelming majority of
them women and children. The FBI estimates approximately $9.5 billion dollars is
generated annually for organized crime from trafficking in persons. And the
International Labor Organization estimates that, presently, 2.4 million persons have
been trafficked into situations of forced labor. Joe Biden said, "Human trafficking
is a daunting and critical global issue that often victimizes the most vulnerable
among us. Thousands of young men and women are shipped into this country
every year, and countless more are subjugated within our borders, to be
abused and brutalized in this horrendous form of modern day slavery. I
strongly urge my colleagues to support this reauthorization and to pass it in
the Senate as quickly as possible." So then: If I held foreign citizenship then I
would receive the protection of this act but as I am natural born I do not receive the
protection of the is act or The Constitution? Joe Biden protects only foreigners and
foreign ideas?

36
Second, the State of GA charging 5 Justices with treason? See attached GA
document. This happened but I did not know it. GA “resolved” to charge the Justices
with treason. Is there a statute of limitations if the Officers never acted upon it and
The People did not know so had no opportunity to act? A person named Carl is
putting a book of history together based upon archival documents. He was afraid.
Nobody needs to keep a book of HISTORY so super secret. If it’s history then it
happened so lots of people know. His ‘partner’ in the endeavor was telling him it was
super sensitive and could get us killed. What's this guy’s agenda? Is he a Stalin in
Carl’s world? Carl told me that we had to worry about Britain as in “the queen; you
know this means we are declaring war on the queen”. I said, "Carl WHO told you
that? What's Queen Elizabeth gonna do? Like the Queen will hit you with her purse;
who's afraid of the Queen Elizabeth???" He laughed. Then he said it was Britain. I
said, "No; all vestiges of Britain. It only seems as if as we are divesting ourselves of
the crutches we have been depending on as that’s how we mistakenly replaced
people with paper. Like writs; who needs a writ to enter SCOTUS? You’re making
your case to The People. A good lawyer never goes inside a court. I didn't but yet
millions and millions joined the class known as The People as did the US Military
twice over." Then he said, “Well royalty as they need the IMF and Federal Reserve to
exist as they own it so it exists to make them wealthy at our expense” but I countered
with “I know it’s a pyramid scheme; I have an idea for a new type of currency based
upon supply and demand controlled by The People; we can still use the bills we have
now as no debt is incurred unless you agree to enter a contract with that person thus
you do not have to accept those bills and never did as refusal to grant service is not a
violation of the EP&DP clauses; I can’t be forced to sell you anything or take your
money; you cannot and may not force me to enter a contract thus I’ll win if you sue
me…I can act as a discriminating business owner and discriminating consumer – I’m
a discriminating stock holder - thus deny service to Obama and McCain as I refused
to sell him or McCain my vote. I refused to sell any person my vote. If the people who
are and work for The Federal Reserve join the class known as The People then all
they have to do is then make themselves legal by fine-tuning their own institution;
you don’t change the past but merely change it in the now so by naming the Fed and
IMF I gave The People, including the Federal Reserve and the IMF employees – UN
- the most liberty. Take the UN; no American can sit and act as Secretary General.
Well if it was never legal and now we had the oil for food scam then we can make it
legal by entering a lawful Treaty but we can fine-tune the terms so an American may
become Secretary General. As I was raised in NY thus directly harmed by the UN like
diplomats killing New Yorkers but then leaving without facing prosecution? Then I
can undo it via contract law only to redo it via contract law only now we ‘recreate’ so
it is inline with the Constitution and Marbury. My idea for currency? We leave Stone
Age beliefs about paper dollars and currency in general behind as any monetary
system based upon a supply and demand that rests outside of your person and is

37
controlled by a few and is a limited natural resource will never work. Gold? Most of its
value is arbitrary as people like its appearance for jewelry. People like the way it
looks. The intrinsic value of gold is not what it once was as we do not even need it for
many technologies today and those we do? How much gold do you need in a
microprocessor? So we introduce a new idea as to what currency is and what gives it
actual, intrinsic value yet use the paper dollars we have now so our awareness
changes. That dollar is a symbol; today it symbolizes a denial of informed consent so
we tell the truth thus it will then its value is based upon the truth. ”. Carl realized I did
indeed know what I was talking about and had accounted for everything. He finally
gave it up: Carl said, “You know me; I say I 'marched into the Pentagon' fully knowing
that I would be stopped by a security guard. I knew I wasn’t getting inside but I had to
tell someone how I felt; I had to tell someone that I knew the truth of what happened
to this nation.” Yes, as that’s Marbury, acting, although Carl did not know it. Does
Carl’s history book partner know Carl is not literally saying he marched into the
Pentagon? as I thought, 'Well, I DO march into the Pentagon. The US Navy told me
this; I left Mayport and went to DC, the Pentagon as it could not be SCOTUS or
Clinton; it would never be Clinton. What am I not hearing?’ So I said, "Okay Carl: I do
not know why people are so afraid but it's too late: I already realized your worst fear
as I did declare war in SCOTUS. I used that word, WAR, and I even accounted for
Queen Elizabeth. In 2007, 07-9804. You can read it online. Your worst fear did not
come true. This I why you never consider the consequences in federal court - you
can’t know them until you go there. It’s why Jefferson said more harm is done by
what never was than what is.” Carl then vetted me although he may not have known
it. When he was satisfied that I really did do all of this - it is on paper and I my own
self could then do it in person - I told him: "Let's go there: Pretend we do go to war
with Britain. Based on past results I'd say that had a fantastic result." He cracked up
laughing at himself – we exist because of our first revolt - thus I knew what was about
to transpire. He then VOLUNTEERED: He said he had an 'interesting' document that
he wanted me the President to see I laughed as I suspected what I would see:
Barack Obama's paper birth certificate. And death certificate.

FOREIGNIZATION, AS IF SCOTUS DID COMMIT TREASON THAT'S A CROWN. A

Justice and/or the whole court would need to violate both the letter and spirit of the
law to commit treason and do it with deliberation. Am I arguing against GA or
SCOTUS? That's sounds like a per curiam ruling to me; that sounds like a 13th &
14th amendment argument to me as which one of these idiots can't file federal
criminal charges by entering SCOTUS in person and so convicting them if it is
treason? A guy who wants and needs the 13th & 14th amendment, that's who. He
plans upon going federal. How do you think we got stuck with 16 & 17?

38
You can and may resolve to press charges but then you have to serve them. So if
you resolve to charge Justices – resolve as in Res. 511 - where do you serve it?
SCOTUS. I took out both chains in 2007; I Commanded via overturning BVG by
deciding the tie in my favor and then when I went to take out Presidential, where a
resolution would land, I first instituted a constitutional chain via the advice of a Naval
expert as we know the current one is unconstitutional as having two members of
Congress creates a conflict of interest and it was meant to appease Congress; I then
went to access it but as soon as I saw the lowest Cabinet position I did not need to
take any action: Cheney’s daughter worked for the lowest position thus that wiped
out the chain w/o me standing down those people. You never needed to see the GA
document. But:

This was served to THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES. It did begin to move up

the chain. It would then wind its way up to the VP and the VP does not stand a sitting
President and/or Chief Justice down. He does not make law alone. The only way this
is legally and actually possible in the US under our form of government is if the sitting
President is guilty of a crime and/or treason. Gore could have removed Clinton upon
to being found guilty of perjury but then again Gore participated by protecting him
earlier. So then the corruption would rise up to the President via an election and then
it would become a case for SCOTUS – if we could get inside a court. What if the
system is endemically corrupted until it is criminal? It would rise past SCOTUS and
so into the world arena as in this case it then has to be treason thus John Roberts
and the other Justices are either the victims of crimes themselves or are
incapacitated too thus can’t defend themselves. So Res. 511 is a Catch-22
situation from which women cannot escape as the executive is and always has
been Exclusively male and no man who sits only because of Res. 511 is then
going to address it. Thus step down voluntarily.

An example is Nixon V US; that went to SCOTUS. The Chief Justice stands a
President down but in this case treason was committed in BVG by lawyers and then
it became LEGALLY criminal at Roberts appointment as can and may a sitting Chief
rule his own appointment is illegal? Maybe - but again you must account for a crime
committed against Roberts and for incapacitation as proven by recent SCOTUS
rulings caused by the discrimination of women. SCOTUS then is an impossible
standard, an insurmountable male majority that stops at the SCOTUS clerks. It does
not go past lawyers at the clerks; it can’t be the lawyers inside SCOTUS. As men
they might possess the same mistaken belief 99.9% of all men do regarding women
but as lawyers? They can’t be guilty.

A GA governor or legislator might go to SCOTUS him or her self but did they? Not in
this case thus it then fell to a citizen if it is the truth, it is treason, or if it is ever the

39
case in the future thus it is both "Obama's" birth and death certificate as it kills
foreignization of the executive. The only thing Obama could not do is go to Congress
and claim that SCOTUS is wrong as that is he, making a case to The People thus
trying The People or saying the People are wrong. I said: YES WE ARE AS WE
‘ELECTED’ YOU, AS WE HAD NO LIBERTY. THANKS FOR CONFESSING AS
NOW YOUR GOOSE IS COOKED AS THE WHOLE WORLD HEARD YOU AS THE
STATE OF THE UNION ADDRESS IS BROADCAST WORLDWIDE. So it then goes
to world court and/or falls back into SCOTUS with my person as the legal,
constitutionally set President and Commander. Then upon election 2012 when The
People elect a new President and Commander upon their own will for the first time
since Lincoln then liberty rises: It’s a never-ending chain or open-ended system as
The People are the government:

Currently this chain is severed due to Clinton and before that? It went up so far and
then came back down without any resolution to the problem at hand so The People
were denied liberty. A civilian should be able to access the chain and end at
President if needed; at President it then would become a problem for the
Commander while a person in uniform should be able to access the chain and end at
Commander; it then goes to the President – it’s me as both - so I might take the
problem to Congress. Today you never actually solve anything and the Military is
commanded by committee and it is about political campaigns funded by privateers
thus contracts go to political donors thus the Military is losing its morality as
Eisenhower’s warning re the military-industrial complex came to be realized; it has no
moral center. Exactly like The People. I, Susan, unite both powers in one person thus
chain of command and so liberty is restored. Obama can never do this. It would have
happened if he could or if he is natural born and not corrupted. What people felt upon
his ‘election’ is not actual liberty as their emotional compass had been skewed due to
decades of abuse of power by the sitting Officers. It’s “voter as President and
Commander” down to “voter as uniform and civilian” and then up again; it’s lawful,
elegant chain of command as a circuit is completed.

In this case you cast your vote farthest of all – across the world. You make it possible
for all people everywhere to become liberated and do open the door so a foreign
born citizen may become elected in the future w/o breaking the law. It’s the essence
of equal protection and due process; it’s the state of being beyond enlightenment
known as the Christos and contained within US law. Exert constitutional authority
correctly thus perfect love and the liberty engine engages.

This one’s for Mullen and the US Military: The chain I pulled around SCOTUS thus
The People? Obama and Bauer did not get it. What did genius liberty engineer

40
Kosciusko drag across the Hudson to defend West Point? A giant chain; he jerked
their chain then and I’m jerking their chain now.

Obama may not try and convict the Justices from the floor of Congress nor may he
convict the clerks who summarized the case; Obama was using propaganda to harm
you, The People. He was attempting to dictate to you his own false beliefs, incorrect
application and wrong facts thus lies as he’s a legal expert so he knows to then
escape the consequences of the law - of you, The People, discovering the truth. I
have no idea what the paper the US Marshal had in his hand actually said but he told
me that I could never, ever enter the truth to any federal court again ever in my life –
not even SCOTUS - or else I’d be convicted with one sentence from my 200 page
suit. Although no arrest was being made now that one sentence would be magically
filed away forever to then use against me thus The People in the future. It takes a
team of lawyers to find one sentence in a lawsuit; Obama and his cabal can’t make
me afraid:

The GA document names Warren, the Chief Justice. It then automatically goes to
THE PEOPLE. Eisenhower named Warren to then stop Thurgood Marshall and
Brown from proceeding. The President is guilty of making an attempt to politicize the
Court as Eisenhower later said Warren was his biggest mistake. I truly believe
Warren set out to make us conduct the experiment as The People refused. Brown
proceeded and Marshall won the day with a terrible argument but he entered actual
proof of life. People name this argument as some of the worst harm we suffer from as
it caused two generations of Americans to possess a mistaken belief as it makes the
PAPER a LIVING DOCUMENT. Paper has no will and liberty; it is dead. People
mistakenly connected the proof to the paper argument, as if life proved the paper is
alive instead of proved the injury was reality and occurred very early on in people,
when they are children. As a clerk Rhenquist caught this and issued a summary
against hearing it later saying it wasn’t the point of law or the proof; he did not believe
it was a sound argument. Rhenquist was for equality but not for this argument then
being the case for equality. Marshall never defended it saying he did what he had to
do. We then lived the violence of the Civil Rights movement. We never achieved
equality nor remedied segregation and Brown came back to SCOTUS as money can
no longer be used to solve segregation. Correct, as money is not the answer and as I
know how to solve it. See my world court petition.

GA, birthplace or “home” of Thomas - a historical fact denied by his own biographers;
GA, home of Jimmy Carter who is all over my world court petition; GA, home of the
peanut and so then George Washington Carver, a man who told Congress that he
found his genius in the bible and when Congress asked if the peanut was exactly
named in the bible he answered, ‘No, but the God who created the peanut is so if you

41
know him then you can know over 300 uses for his creation known as the peanut’;
GA, a colony that was a penal colony originally and our 13th colony: X marks the
spot. If I were Obama or anyone of these guys I'd name Susan Herbert thus The
People as my worst nightmare as Susan Herbert could not have done this without a
People, 300 million People as one:

“President Barack Obama was wrong and Justice Samuel Alito was right.
During his first State of the Union speech on Wednesday, President Barack Obama
incorrectly stated that foreign nationals and foreign entities can now contribute
unlimited amounts of money to U.S. political campaigns because of a recent U.S.
Supreme Court ruling lifting certain campaign finance restrictions. This prompted an
immediate reaction from Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito, who, sitting directly in
front of the president, shook his head and apparently mouthed the words “not true”
when Obama made his remark. The high court’s 5-4 ruling in a First Amendment
case, Citizens United vs. Federal Elections Commission (FEC), lifted restrictions for
companies, unions, and other organizations to make independent expenditures in
political campaigns. The court decision, however does not allow corporations
to contribute directly to a campaign or coordinate expenditures with a campaign. Nor
did the ruling lift existing law that blocks foreign contributions to political campaigns.
In his speech, Obama also claimed the court reversed 100 years of law when, in fact,
it overturned a 1990 decision in Austin vs. Michigan Chamber of Commerce. Also,
parts of the McCain-Feingold reform bill from 2002 that restricted independent
political advertising in the closing days of an election were struck down. “With all due
deference to separation of powers, last week the Supreme Court reversed a century
of law that I believe will open the floodgates for special interests – including foreign
corporations – to spend without limit in our elections,” Obama said.” – CNS News

And who was sitting behind Obama during the State of the Union Address? Biden,
VP and President of the Senate and Pelosi, Speaker of the House. I’m assuming the
3rd in line due to the unconstitutional chain named in the 26 th amendment, the
President of the Senate Pro Tempore, was in the audience or watching from home.
The GA document and Obama’s words then take out the entire chain of command as
Pelosi cannot and may not deny that this GA document rests in her own House; if
Carl knew of it and I could reasonably assume it existed thus know to go to very
exacting People to secure it then anybody can know thus ignorance is not an excuse
or a reason in this case. Pelosi had a duty and an obligation to defend The People
as did Obama and Biden. They condoned and then aided and abetted this criminal
activity. Maybe a photograph is worth a thousand words or about 650 guilty verdicts
as previously I served them all; they, their own words and actions, are the absolute
proof.

42
And Carl’s friend who also works with the constitutional Congress and the American
Grand jury or so I was told? He truly believes as do many Americans that you can
use this GA document to the indict the Supreme Court employees, Justices and
clerks, to then become the President. He like many Americans truly believes that the
paper is the proof when paper CAN’T be the proof if your constitutionally set
government is The People. He had an agenda: He wanted to become President –
that’s his ego but he does not have criminal intent nor any unjust motivation although
he is sexist – but other Americans actually believe as does he that this is proof
SCOTUS employees are guilty thus it is as I said: SCOTUS employees became my
clients as only I can defend them. The Justices have an interest only in fulfilling the
oath of office as do all Americans even the Officers so there is no conflict. The
People decide this case upon informed consent; The People may still choose
Obama. When I first told SCOTUS clerks that I would be acting in their defense as a
part of the injured class, The People, I do not think they fully understood, as they
were not aware of the injury as lawyers keep citing injury like misfiled documents
when that is never a crime – if you hold a law license. The reason I never called
SCOTUS after my initial phone call in 2007 unless I had to – I phoned twice after that
in over three years - and the reason I acted until at least one clerk did obey the letter
and spirit of the law is because: I had to protect all clerks. If I could find one ethical
clerk then the whole class is then protected as it cannot then be endemic criminal
activity but only corruption and even that corruption is not endemic but is based upon
the original injury of which the clerks knew nothing about: BVG targeting them, as
clerks and lawyers, and privateers and other lawyers acting to force socialism on us
from a time when Clinton was still governor of Arkansas. No clerk could know what I
do about Joe Biden or Harvard unless I told him and I did not – in order to protect
them when I finally achieved equilibrium with Roberts and Obama. When Obama
threatened my person he was also threatening every citizen namely and firstly clerks
and Justices as I was told the one and only thing I could not do ever is enter the truth
to any federal court not even SCOTUS. I asked if I could enter a lie and I was told
yes, I could lie like Obama did in January but I could never again enter the truth as
THE PEOPLE could never know the truth. I have plenty of witnesses as this event
transpired in public not in private.

Barack Obama’s speech against the Supreme Court constitutes treason or so I

believe; it was and is meant to re-educate The People via conditioning; proof is many
Americans now truly believe Obama’s words - SCOTUS is guilty of treason when
Obama is as are other Officers; it is why I entered my federal question regarding
overthrow and free speech as early as 2007: Is it protected free speech to organize
and collect money to then overthrow The People or is it treason? Is it unconstitutional
only if you organize and collect money or is constitutional, my you advocate it, as

43
long as you do not organize and/or collect money? Obama proved my answer thus
my application of the law as he is the proof as am I and as are The People:

America, the constitutional attorney and professor that sits as President legal or not
that the unjust persons who are Officers forced upon you has entered this legal
argument to the Chief Justice and so to The People during his State of the Union
Address, an official occasion thus the standard is strictest as Obama appeared at the
invitation of the Speaker of the House or at the invitation of The People thus the
government was convened at the time as a legal entity: “I know you are but what am
I?”

I’m in Re Susan, 07-9804 thus not a usurper or a traitor and as it is docketed and
was on the case conference list then clerks can’t be usurpers or traitor either. At least
two Justices, Roberts and Alito, are not either as it is like I said: The Declaration,
Federalist Papers, Constitution, Marbury are all The Founders wrote unless you
count American common law – 200 years of SCOTUS rulings as WE are American
Founders as WE aren’t finished until I, a natural born voter who is wholly innocent,
who never took a shortcut and who defended all of The People without exception
acts in defense of The People, thus am heard in person before SCOTUS.

My case was won when this universe came into creation and so when will and liberty
was joined in man as via resolving Uniformity I then know God is the Alpha and the
Omega, all that was, is now and will be; that God thought be and we are while the
Founders thought be but then unlike the God had to act upon it so we, The People,
are. See 07-9804. Proof: Judicial review is the myth of fingerprints.

REASONING TO GRANT STAY

The person who needs to be gagged is Obama and the other Officers. There is a
clear and present danger: The dictatorship I knew was on the rise and that Kurt
Godel warned might be realized is now here. I was forced to watch the development
of this regime as it gave me the answers I needed to then inform The People in
America and then across Earth so we never need to suffer it again. Barack Obama
may not like being compared to Hitler but there was a time when Hitler was not Hitler;
he too was used as a puppet and he too woke up too late thus fell under his own
grandiose delusion. “Absolute power corrupts absolutely”; persons who run upon
nothing but power and control are absolute monsters as who would ever want or
need to subject humanity to the Chinese nuclear threat if not necessary and what
kind of man would enjoy assaulting and battering a woman and her children? These
men as they have a record of abusing power and control and targeting women. What
kind of people are so greedy and gluttonous that the trappings of power hold them
hostage? These men as they were and are willing to kill to then hold onto things like

44
the Whitehouse and Air Force One as they
attract above People. It’s not money these
gives them. They like harming others. It’s
control not the act of sex thus a matter
rendering them helpless and powerless.
value things and the flattery those things
men love but the feeling acting corruptly
rape, as rape is a matter of power and
of instilling fear in your victim and so

If a US leader seeks to make his own people afraid and sends Officers to the home
of any one citizen to then prevent her from defending The People then it is time for us
to act, before it explodes into violence as in Rwanda and Cambodia. We can act now
while persons are merely making death threats but not acting upon them and while
protests are warming up and becoming more physical but are not yet violent. The trial
The People needed they now have so we do not need to sink into a bloody revolution
like France. No blood has to be shed by civilians. The People will have the truth and
the means to secure their liberty thus feel liberty for the first time in about 200 years. I
included the extremes such as the Federal Reserve and UN’s unconstitutionality as
then The People can fine-tune the institutions to then become constitutional. I gave
The People the most choices I could thus upon adjudication no matter who The
People choose liberty should pour out from my person upon The People as our
Declaration and Constitution will rise as if the fabled winged rattlesnake, the
feathered serpent of infinity.

I did not wait to find there was no one left to help me as many Germans did; I learned
the lessons history taught me thus this time around I fought the Revolution alone, on
paper, thus bringing all of The People with me.

A citizen can and may sue a sitting President if he is legally sitting if he directly harms
that citizen; this has now happened to me. Marbury does not make the US Marshal
guilty as I know of a pre-existing injury so that this Marshal truly believed he had no
choice. If the President is not sitting legally as every one of the petitioners rights have
been violated until she is no longer living in a Constitutional Republic and she has
never been accorded any protection of the law at all? She can and may sue to
enforce the Constitution and that then is the case for equality which men and women
have not achieved nor have white and black citizens. In my case I exhausted the
process entirely so no court is left save world court or a violent revolt on The
People’s part.

A majority, the whole court even, is likely to rule for me thus securing their
constitutional authority once again by upholding Marbury on behalf of myself then all
women and their children both male and female thus all Americans and applicant is
likely to prevail on the merits as it is math and exact words of our law plus the exact
words of prior federal precedent, those involved and is actual biology. My case is

45
supported by proven scientific fact, my own experience of this American life and
eyewitness testimony. I am the only person ever to be granted the standing of pro se,
authority and original jurisdiction and I have done it twice over. I entered directly for
the first time since Marbury in 1803. Again: This application may be accepted as the
complaint also due to the time factor involved and the existent clear and present
danger. This application fully satisfies the criteria that govern the propriety of granting
a stay, because (1)* there is “a reasonable probability that four Members of the Court
will consider the issue sufficiently meritorious to grant certiorari[an extraordinary
writ],” Graves v. Barnes, 405 U.S.1201, 1203 (1972) (Powell, J., in chambers); (2)
there is “a fair prospect that five Justices will conclude that the case was erroneously
decided below,” Lucas v. Townsend, 486 U.S. 1301, 1304 (1988) (Kennedy, J., in
chambers); and (3) it is likely that irreparable injury will result if a stay is denied. Id.;
California v. American Stores Co., 492 U.S.1301, 1304-07 (1989) (O’Connor, J., in
chambers). My life has now been threatened by Obama himself and by persons
under his employ. Marbury does not apply ot the US marshal who delivered this
threat as he could not know something and as I proved the injury to the US Marshal’s
service is pre-existing thus Obama himself is liable according to Marbury. In
appropriate cases, the Circuit Justice may “balance the equities to determine whether
the injury asserted by the applicant outweighs the harm to other parties or to the
public.” Lucas, 486 U.S. at 1304. This then applies to my person. And: Marbury:
While you may not sue the sitting President for what is political you may sue the
sitting President if it is a matter of direct injury, if it is an actual equal protection and
due process question brought by a member of the injured class and if the question
itself is whether or not the installation of this President was ever legal due to an
absolute denial of liberty and a violation of Art. 4 Sec.4 and so did it then constitute
overthrow of the People if he is not natural born? Direct injury I suffered by this
person as well as BVG and my prior action to preserve my legal standing by entering
SCOTUS directly for the first time since 1803 upon a case of authority and original
jurisdiction before the first primary then grants me standing to sue; so does the fact
that I hold on law license and belong to on political party and never have. In Bush V
Gore the stay was accepted as the petition also as it was in Donofrio V Wells; my
prior petitions namely 08-6622 which entered directly and 07-9804 and 09-6777 as
well as my brief already on file may be accepted as the Petition itself for according to
the separation of powers and because no person has ever risen to test thus prove
Marbury and US law itself and as most Americans are incorrectly and mistakenly
taught that the Supreme Court, the institution, is unconstitutional and unlawful and
that our law is based upon the Magna Carta when it is not as it is based upon the
model known as the Iroquois Confederacy, then SCOTUS employees do not have
the power or authority to deny me protection of the natural birth clause nor the equal
protection and due process clauses nor may SCOTUS deny hearing a case in person
in which the very denial of the paper ruling by SCOTUS is now the violation of the

46
right as a case conference is not sufficient hearing due to the nature of the injury as
The People have been injured to a point of incapacitation and as paper is never proof
in a constitutional nation so that this becomes a final test of Marbury and so the
adjudication of the piece of paper itself thus then forcing delivery of the paper
commission to occur. As SCOTUS employees are some of The People and so arise
from The People? The People may not deny me the protection of the law; if The
People had not first denied me any and all protection of the law and denied all
women safety then I never would have made it into SCOTUS as I did. In the cases of
women? No woman ever had actual protection of the law but only what is arbitrary
and based upon personal policies and beliefs as women were denied a voice from a
time before we were ever founded and by the time they did receive a vote The
Constitution had been changed in 1871 thus no opportunity for any woman ever
existed. White men changed the law to then protect white men as they never saw a
day whereby even white men would sold into human bondage and slavery.

Under these most extraordinary of all circumstances, the effect of a failure to grant a
stay could well be to deny Applicants fully effective relief or any relief in this case and
to inflict material harm on the Presidential election process. A stay is further justified
by the extraordinary importance of the outcome of this case and the extremely time-
sensitive nature of relief. Applicants have been injured without relief for over ten
years to the point of physical and emotional death; currently they are threatened with
irreparable injury, and the equities clearly favor granting a stay, because a stay is the
only means of protecting Susan Herbert, her minor sons Ethan and Christopher, all
women and their children, enlisted service members and the integrity of the federal
election process while ensuring women and the poor have proper and orderly access
to the judicial system. Women have been harmed since a time before birth as our
nation came into being excluding women thus it is high time the federal government
accord them what is theirs: Equal protection and due process of the law, also known
as Liberty as:

The People is the constitutionally set government of the US not the Officers.

Susan Herbert

47