Judge Mary Ann Grilli 2007 Statement of Economic Interests California Form 700: Judge Mary Ann Grilli Santa Clara County Superior Court - Presiding Judge Rise Jones Pinchon - Cleveland State Law Review: Socioeconomic Bias in the Judiciary - California Code of Judicial Ethics Canons 3B(5),(6), 3C(2)(5) Prohibiting Bias Based on Socioeconomic Status

CALIFORNIA FORM
cS:TiA'llEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS

: r.!S: POLl11Ch ic:Es coHr1ss1utcoV
ER PAGE
700
RE
FAIR P01 ll CAL PRAC-:'!CES cor.1. SS 01
ED
;: 2008
. r
2008 FEB I 9 AH 9: Ji3Public Document
Please type or print in ink
O'lt!A
FI
.i<.
(LAST)
ME
(FIRST)
GRILLI
MAILING ADDRESS
STREET
(May use business address)
(MIDDLE)
MARY
CITY
SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

Division, Board, District, if applicable:
- If filing for multiple positions, list additional agency(ies)/

position(s): (Attach a separate sheet if necessary.)
-------
2. Jurisdiction of Office
City of
(Check at least one box)
SANTA CLARA
Schedule A-1
Schedule B
schedule attached
Schedule C
Iii Yes - schedule attached
Schedule D
0 Yes -
schedule attached
0 Yes -
schedule attached
Income, Loans, & Business Positions (Income 011ter than Gills

and Travel Paym&nts)
Schedule E
______________
_
-or-
Assuming Office/Initial
00
Annual: The period covered is January

through December 31, 2007.
Date:--
1, 2007,
-orThe period covered is --. through

December 31, 2007.
Leaving Office
(Check one)
No reportable interests on any schedule
(Check at least one box)
Date Left: -
The period covered is January

date of leaving office.
1, 2007.
5. Verification
I have used all reasonable diligence in preparing this
statement. I have reviewed this statement and to the best of
my knowledge the information contained herein and in any
attached schedules is true and complete.
I certify under penalty of perjury under the laws of the State
of California that the foregoing Is true and correct.
through the
-or0
0 Yes -
Real Property
Income - Travel Payments
3. Type of Statement
schedule attached
Schedule A-2
00 Yes - schedule attached
Investments (10% or greater Ownrsh/p)
0 Other -------
00 Yes -
Investments (Less than 10% Ownership)
Income - Gifts
_______________
_
Multi-County
1.-2_
...
I have disclosed interests on one or more of the

attached schedules:
SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE
of
- Total number of pages

including this cover page:
- Check applicable schedules or "No reportable

interests."
Your Position:
00 State
Iii County
95113
CA
4. Schedule Summary
Name of Office, Agency, or Court:
Position:
( 408 )
OPTIONAL: FAX I E-MAIL ADDRESS
ANN
STATE ZIP CODE
SANJOSE,
1. Office, Agency, or Court
DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER
Date Signed
8
21., _0
2.,..
1 1..
_
______
_____
_
(monlh, day year)
The period covered is --. through

the date of leaving office.
00
Candidate
FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008)

FPPC Toll-Free Helpline: 866/ASKFPPC
CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH NEWS SERVICE
CJBNS.ORG
CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
Stocks, Bonds, and Other Interests
MARY ANN GRILLI
(Ownership Interest is Less Than 10%}

Do not attach brokerage or fn
i ancial statements.
>
>
NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY
KLA TENCOR
OF
BUSINESS ACTIVITY
GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY
SEMICONDUCTOR EQUIPMENT
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s2.ooo s10.ooo
0 $100,001 $1,000,000
0 $10.001 - $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
0 $2,000 $10,000
00 $100,001 - $1,000,000
-
NATURE OF INVESTMENT
00
Other _______________
(Desaibe)
IF APPLICABLE. LIST DATE:
>
LOWE'S COMPANIES
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY
FAlR MARKET VALUE
D s10.001 s100.ooo
0 Over $1.000,000
00 $2,000
Other _______________
(Desaibe)
ACQUIRED
>
CONSUMER STAPLES
$10.000
!Kl $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
Stock
Other
(Desaibe)
Comments:
PROCTER & GAMBLE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
0 $2,000
IX] $10,001 - $100,000
$10,000
D s100.001 - s1.ooo.ooo
0 Over 51,000,000
Other ______________ _
(Describe)
IF APPLICABLE. UST
IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATE:
ACQUIRED
IKJ Stock
______________
_
__JJll_
DISPOSED
00
__J
CONSUMER STAPLES
$1,000,000
Olher __ ____________ _
(Oesaibe)
ACQUIRED
>
PEPSICO
D s2.ooo
$100,000
Stock
_!_J.E._
DISPOSED
0 $100,001
0 Over $1,000,000
__;.E._
FAIR MARKET VALUE
0 $10.001
$10,000
IK)
Stock
...!..J2:!.JJR_
0 $100,001 - $1,000,000
CONSUMER DISCRETIONARY
00
DISPOSED
NIKE
__J..!fl_
ACQUIRED
>
00 $2.000. $10,000
0 $100,001 $1,000,000
Other _______________
(Oosaibe)
__J__J._
DISPOSED
FAIR MARKET VALUE
Stock
__J__j._
ACQUIRED
Stock
__J__J_9L
00 $10 001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
ASYST TECHNOLOGY
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
00
700
FAlq POlIT CAL PRAc1cES CO'N111S!) ON
__J__J.E._
DISPOSED
JR_
ACQUIRED
DATE:
__j__J.JL
DISPOSED
------
FPPC Form 7DO (20D7/2D08) Sch. A-1

CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI
(Ownership Interest is Less Than 10%)

Do not attach brokerage or financial statements.
>

BP PLC
>
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2,000 . $10.000
D s100.001 $1.000.000
00 $10,001
FAIR MARKET VALUE

D s2.ooo s10.ooo
0 $100,001. $1,000,000
$100,000
0 Olher
(Oesaibe)
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED

CITIGROUP INC.
>
!RI $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
0 Other

JP MORGAN CHASE & CO.
!Kl $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
00 Stock
0 Other
(Desctibe)
tF APPLICABLE. LIST DATE:

ACQUIRED
Comments:
>
__J__J_!E_
DISPOSED

WELLS FARGO
FINANCIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s2.ooo $10.000
D s100.001 $1.000.000
Ii] $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
00 Stock
______________
_
___jJl]_
(Oeseribel
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
_
______________
.E.L.l.JJ!l....
__J__JJ!]_
FINANCIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s2.000 s10.ooo
D s100.001. s1.ooo.ooo
!XI $10,001 $100.000

0 Over $1,000,000
>

GOLDMAN SACHS
00 Stock
(Describe)
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
______________
_
_g_L.l.JJ!l....
__J__J
FINANCIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
0 $2,000 $10.000
!Kl Stock
0 Other
(Oeseribe)
_R_J-1...
..J
__J__J
FINANCIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D $2.ooo. s10.ooo
D s100.001 s1.ooo.ooo
_
______________
>
00 Stock
-------
ACQUIRED
!Kl $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
0 Over $1,000,000
!Kl Stock
__J__J...E_

CHEVRON TEXICO
ENERGY
ENERGY
0 Other
70 0
FAIR POLITICAL PRAC ..ICLS con.11ss:oN
Other
______________
_
(Oesaibe)
__J__JJl]_
DISPOSED
__J__JJ!]_
ACQUIRED
__1__1Jl]_
DISPOSED
------------
FPPC Form 700 (200712008) Sch. A-1

FPPC TollFree Helpline: 866/ASKFPPC
CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

>
>
JOHNSON & JOHNSON
FAIR MARKET VALUE
HEALTH CARE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
$10,001 $100.000
0 Over $1.000,000
D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
0
0
s100.001. s1.ooo.ooo
Stock
!Kl
Other
Stock
__J__JJR_
__J__JJR_
DISPOSED
ACQUIRED
>
3M CO.
NAME
OF
DISPOSED
BUSINESS ENTITY
INDUSTRIALS
INDUSTRIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
s10 ooo
D s100.001
IKl $10,001 $100,000

0 Over $1,000,000
s1.ooo.ooo
Stock
Other -------
(Oesaibe)
lij
Stock
her -------
_LJ.!!!_
--1--1.!!L
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
ACQUIRED
>
L-3 COMMUNICATIONS
INDUSTRIALS
INDUSTRIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
00 $10.001
0
$100,000
Over $1,000.000
Other _______________
(Oescnbe)
ACQUIRED
!XI $10,001 - $100.000

0 Over $1,000,000
0 $2,000 $10,000
0 $100,001 - $1,000,000
Stock
__J__J..!R_
DISPOSED
FAIR MARKET VALUE
__J__J_!R
UNITED PARCEL SERVICE
0 $2,000 $10,000
0 $100,001 $1,000,000
JR_
!Kl $10.001 $100,000

0 Over $1.000,000
D s2.ooo s10 ooo

__J__/Jll_
GENERAL ELECTRIC
s2.ooo -
Over $1,000,000
(Oewibe)
IKJ
$1,000,000
(Oesalbe)
ACQUIRED
IX! $10,001 - $'100,000
$10,000
HEAL TH CARE FUND
__j.2!1..J..JfL
>
$2,000
$100,001
IKJ
>
HEAL TH CARE SELECT SECTOR
HEALTH CARE FUND
700
FAIR POLITICAt PRACTICES CO MMIS SIO
IKJ
Stock
Other _______________
__J__J.J]_
DISPOSED
__)JR_
ACQUIRED
--1--1..!L
DISPOSED
FPPC Form 700 (200712008) Sch. A1

FPPC Toll-Free Helpline: 866/ASK-FPPC
CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

>
>
GENERAL DESCRIPTION
OF
BUSINESS ACTIVITY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
00 $2,000 - $10,000
$100,000
[Kj
Stock
[]
Other
Other ______________
_
(Oesaibe)
______________
_
(Oe8Clibe)
___;....QL
_J_J
DISPOSED
ACQUIRED
0 Over $1,000,000
liJ stock
_J_JJ!._
IX! $10,001
D s2.ooo s10.ooo
D s100,001 s1.ooo.ooo
0 $10,001 $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
_J___J
ACQUIRED
>
DISPOSED
E.I. DUPONT OE NEMOURS
AT&T
TELECOMMUNICATIONS
MATERIALS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
0 $100,001
FAlR MARKET VALUE
0 $2,000. $10,000
1K1 s10.001 s100.ooo

0 Over $1,000,000
D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
$1,000,000
(Describe)
_J___j_fil_
>
UTILITIES
D s2.ooo. s10.ooo
00 $10,001
$100.000
0 Over $1,000.000
(Describe)
ACQUIRED
___J___!
_J
!!_
DISPOSED
Iii $10,001 $100.000

0 Over $1,000,000
D s2.ooo s10.ooo
D s100,001 s1.ooo,ooo
______________
_
_J___j..._
(Ot8Clibel
FAIR MARKET VALUE
IF APPLICABLE, LIST
______________
_
BONDS
FAIR MARKET VALUE
Other
Other
FHLB
ACQUIRED
DOMINION RESOURCES
Stock
Stock
_!_J.B.J
DISPOSED
IRJ
00
ACQUIRED
_g_J___j..._
00 $10,001 $100.000
D Over $1.000,000
Iii stock
>
YAHOO
MICROSOFT
>
70 0
FAIR PO.ITICA ... PRACT1C[S co.0111SS10N
DATE:
Stock
!RI
Other
BONDS
___J__.![!_
_J
DISPOSED
___J___J.![!_
ACQUIRED
___j_J..._
DISPOSED
FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008) Sch. A-1

CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

>
>
BLACKROCK INTL. BOND
PIMCO TOTAL RETURN
GLOBAL BOND FUND
BOND FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2,000 $10,000
!RI $10,001 - $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
D Stock
00 Other GLOBAL BOND FUND
00 Other BOND FUND
__J__J...E_
ACQUIRED
_J__J2_
ACQUIRED
(Desaibel
_J__J.L_
DISPOSED
>
(Describe)
__J__J..]J_
DISPOSED
PIMCO HIGH YIELD FUND
PIMCO DEV. LOCAL MKTS. FUND
BOND FUND
BOND FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE

D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
0 $100,001 - $1,000.000
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s2.ooo
00 $10,001 - $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
0 Over $1,000,000
IXl Other BOND FUND
(Oesaibel

ACQUIRED
IX] $10,001 - $100,000
s10.ooo
0 Stock
IKJ Other BOND FUND
....!Q..J_!l_J..!L_
0 $100,001 - $1,000,000
0 Stock
>
IX! $10,001 - $100,000
D s100,001 - s1.ooo.ooo
0 Over $1,000,000
0 Stock
>
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2.000 - $10.000
0 $100,001 - $1.000,000
(Oesaibe)
-1--1..!L
_J_JJE.._
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
>
_J_J_!_
DISPOSED
PIMCO EMERGING MARKETS FUND
DFA INrL. SMALL CAP VALUE
BOND FUND
STOCK FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE

D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
D s100.001 - s1.ooo.ooo
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2,000 - $10,000
IX! $10,001 - $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
IKJ Other BOND FUND
D s10.001 - s100.ooo
lil $100,001 - $1,000,000
0 Over $1,000,000
NATE OF INVESTMENT
O Stock
D Stock
(OeSA:libe)
_J__J..!L_
ACQUIRED
70 0
FAIR POLIT:CAL PRACTICES CGrl'.1 SSION
__J__J..!L_
DISPOSED
IXl ether STOCK FUND

IF APPLICABLE, LIST
.JJ..J...ll.JJE.._
ACQUIRED
(Describe)
DATE:
__J_J..!L_
DISPOSED
FPPC Form 700 (2001/2008) Sch. A1

CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

>

DFA INT'L. VALUE PORTFOLIO
>
STOCK FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
S2.000 - $10,000
1K1 s100.001 - s1.ooo.ooo
0 Over $1.000,000
D s100.001 - s1.ooo,ooo
Stoel<
Other STOCK FUND
00 Other STOCK FUND
(Oesaibe)
......__]JL
ACQUIRED
>
..l!.J._
__J__J._
DISPOSED
STOCK FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
Iii
0 $2.000 - $10.000
ACQUIRED
>
$10,001 - $100,000

DFA EMERGING MARKETS VALUE
Other STOCK FUND
IKI Other EMERGING MARKETS FUND
(Describe>
(Describe)
>
DISPOSED
Stoel<
0 Stock
ACQUIRED
__J__JJ}]_
EMERGING MARKETS FUND

FAIR MARKET VALUE
!Kl $10.001 - $100,000
D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
D s100.001 - s1.ooo.ooo
0 Over $1.000,000
0 Over $1,000,000
0 $100,001 - $1,000.000
__J__J..!lI._
(Oescnbe)

HARBOR INTERNATIONAL INS.
!Kl
Iii $10,001 - $100.000

0 Over $1,000,000
0 $2,000 - $10,000
$10.001 - $100.000
0 Stoek
jg]

DFA INT'L. VALUE PORTFOLIO
STOCK FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
IF
--1--1..!lL

FAIR MARKET VALUE
Iii $10.001 - $100,000
0 $2,000 - $10,000
0 Over $1.000,000
0 $100,001 - $1,000,000
APPLICABLE. LIST DATE:
.11...!lL
..J
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED

>
--1--1...E....
DISPOSED

FAIR MARKET VALUE
Iii $10,001 - $100.000
D s2.ooo - srn.ooo
0 Over $1,000,000
0 $100,001 - $1,000,000
Stock
0 Stock
IKI Other
Iii Other EMERGING MARKETS FUND
IF APPLICABLE.
(DscnbeJ
LIST DATE:
-1!.J..!lL
ACQUIRED
700
FAIR POLITICAL PRAClCES cor.n:ss CN
--1--1..!lL
DISPOSED
(Describe)
...!QL..!l..JJlL
...
ACQUIRED
--1--1..!lL
DISPOSED
FPPC Fonn 700 (2007/2008) Sch. A1

FPPC Toll-Free Helpline: 8661ASK..fPPC
CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

l>
>
FIRST EAGLE GOLD FUND-A
GOLD FUND
GOLD FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
!Kl $10,001
IX! $2,000
$100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
!Kl Other GOLD FUND

ACQUIRED
(Oescribt)
__;__;
_l_J_L;
DISPOSED
ACQUIRED
>
__;__;
DISPOSED
AMGEN
MORGAN STANLEY INS. REAL-A
HEALTH CARE
REAL ESTATE FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
0 $2.000. $10,000
0 $100.001 $1,000,000
00
$10,001
$100,000
Stock
D 0t11er
l!'l
_
______________

ACQUIRED
0 Over $1,000,000
IKJ Stock
__;__;..!!!__
IRl $10,001
D s2.ooo s10.ooo
0 $100,001 $1.000,000
$100,000
D Over $1,000,000
>
(Oesaibe)
__;__;
0 $10,001 $100,000
0 Over $1,000,000
$10,000
0 Stock
GOLD FUND
Other
0 $100,001 . $1,000,000
D stock
>
FIRST EAGLE GOLD FUND-A
0 $2,000 $10,000
0 $100,001 $1.000.000
Olher REAL ESTATE FUND
(Describe)
_LJ...ll.JJ!L
2-J...1i.JJ!]_
DISPOSED
ACQUIRED
>
__;__;
DISPOSED
NAME OF BUSlNESS ENTITY
LAUDUS ROSENBERG VALUE
PFIZER
ABSOLUTE RETURN FUND
HEALTH CARE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
$2,000
IX! $10.001
$10,000
0 $100,001
$1,000,000
$100.000
0 Over $1,000.000
Other
(Oesaibe)

ACQUIRED
Stock
ABSOLUTE RETURN FUND
__;__;._
0 $10,001 $100.000
0 Over 51,000,000
Ii] $2,000 s 10,000

IKJ
0 Stock
IRl
7 00
FAIR POLII !CAL PRACTICES CQ',1MISSION
D Other
_
______________
(Describe)
_..!!__J_!Q_jJ!]_
DISPOSED
_J__;J!]_
ACQUIRED
......L!....!.i.JJ!L..
DISPOSED
FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008) Sch. A-1

CALIFORNIA FORM
SCHEDULE A-1
Investments
Name
MARY ANN GRILLI

>
>
MORGAN STANLEY INS. US REAL-A
INTL. DEVELOPOED MARKETS FUND
REAL ESTATE FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s10.001 s100.ooo
D 0ver s1.ooo.ooo
s2.ooo. s10.ooo
D s2.ooo
!Kl $100.001. $1.000.000

Iii
Other
Iii
(Describe)
$100.000
0 Over $1.000,000
0t11er
REAL ESTATE FUND
(Describe)
....LJ.1...1..J[L
__J__j..J[l_
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
>
...RJ_gL_
DISPOSED
MORGAN STANLEY INT'L. REAL ESTATE
THERMAWAVE
REAL ESTATE FUND
FAIR MARKET VALUE
FAIR MARKET VALUE
D s2.ooo. s10.ooo
Iii $10.001 $100.000

0 Over $1,000,000
Iii Stock
REAL ESTATE FUND
(Describe)
__J__J.!E_
ACQUIRED
>
D s10.001
(Describe)
...l.__j
....J
_J_
DISPOSED

FAIR MARKET VALUE
s100.ooo
0 Over $1,000,000
0 $10.001 $100.000
0 Over $1.000,000
D s2.ooo - s10.ooo
D s100.001 - s1.ooo.ooo
Stock
______________
_
__J__J.E!__
ACQUIRED
DISPOSED
FAIR MARKET VALUE
Other
...1.J_!!JJg_
D s2.ooo. s10.ooo
!Kl 0t11er
0 $10.001 $100.000
0 Over $1,000.000
00 $2.000. $10.000
O Stock
>
!Kl $10,001
s10.ooo
0 Stock
INTL. DEVEOPED MARKETS FUND
__J__J_!rr_
ACQUIRED
D s100.001 . s1.ooo.ooo
D Stock
>
MORGAN STANLEY INSTL. EQ.-A
D Stock
0t11er _______________
(OescnbeJ
D Othec
------
IF APPLICABLE. UST DATE:
__j__j..J[l_
__J__J.E!__
ACQUIRED
ACQUIRED
70 0
FAIR POLITICAL PRACTICES co.MISSION
__J__J.E!__
DISPOSED
__j__j._
DISPOSED
FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008) Sch. A-1

SCHEDULE A-2
CJBNS.ORG
Investments, Income, and Assets
FAIR POl'IC/\L PRAC11CES COMMISSIO>l
Name
of Business Entities/Trusts
(Ownership Interest is 10% or Greater)
>
> 1
1 BUSINESS ENTITY OR TRUST
GRILLI REVOCABLE TRUST
700
CALIFORNIA FORM
MARY ANN GRILLI
BUSINESS ENTITY OR lRUST
JOHN GRILLI ROLLOVER IRA-FIDELITY INV.
Name
Name
191 N. FIRST ST., SAN JOSE, CA

Address
Check one
Ill Trust, go to 2
0 Business Entity, complete the box, then go to 2
191 N. FIRST ST., SAN JOSE, CA

Address
Checll one
O Trust. go to 2
O Business Enlity, complete lh11 box, then go to 2
FAIR M ARKET VALUE
__J__J 07
ACQUIRED
B
0
__J __J 07
ACQUIRED
FAIR MARKET VALUE

$2,000 - $10,000
$10,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $1,000,000
__J__J 07
DISPOSED
Over $1,000,000
0 ------
Other
YOUR BUSINESS POSITION -----IOE" TIFY THI: GROSS !\COM!:: RECEIVl:D (INCLUDE YOUR PRO RAIA
$0. $499
D ssoo - s1.ooo
D s1.001 - s10.ooo
$100,001 - $1.000,000
__/__/. 07
DISPOSED
.'.>
--::
...,.-
---
---
Olher
YOUR BUSINESS POSITION -----> 2
IDEmrY THE GROSS !!'.;COME RECEIVED (INCLUDl YOUR PRO RATA
D s10.001 - s100.ooo
D OVER $100,000
0 $0 - $499
0 $500. $1,000
0 $1,001 - $10,000
0 $10,001 - $100,000
D OVER $100,000
INCOME OF $10,000 OR MOR[ (aH.ich
> J UST ltlL NAME or LACH REPORTABLE SINGLL SOURCE Of
INCOME OF $10,000 OR MORE {ln.1,n
'..C'ur,!1 :.hn1:1 11 nC'Cl'S'>,f))
INVESTMENTS ANO INTER!-STS IN REAL PROPERTY Hl::LD B_'r'. THE

BUSINESS ENTITY OR TRUST
Check one box:

IRJINVESTMENT
$10,001 - $100,000
SHARE OF THE GROSS INCOME !.0 THE ENTITY/TRUST)
J. LIST THE NAME OF EACH REPORTABLE: SINGLE SOURCE OF
> 4
$10,000
0 Sole Proprietorship 0 Partnership
SHARE Of THE GROSS INCOME IQ THE: ENTITY/TRUST)
>
0 Over $1,000,000
0 Sole Proprietol$hip 0 Partnership
> 2
$2,000
> 4
r.cpJrlt .,11"1 ,, n..c-;o;J-yl
INVESTMENTS AND INTERESTS IN REAL PROPERTY HELD BY THE

BUSl'.lESS ENTITY
Check one box:

!ii INVESTMENT
Q REAL PROPERTY
.'.l
OR lRUST
Q REAL PROPERTY
SEE SCHEDULE A1
Name d Business Enlity 2!
Street Address or Assessor's Parcel Number of Real Property
JOHN GRILLI ROLLOVER IRA

Name of Business Entity l2I:
Street Address or Assessor's Parcel Number of Real Property
Descriplion of Business Activity SI!

City or Other Precise Location of Real Property
Description of Business
ROLL OVER IRA
IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATE
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2,000 - $10.000
0 $10,001 - $100,000
$100,001 - $1,000,000
0 Over $1.000.000
__J__J 07
ACQUIRED
NATURE OF INTEREST
0 Property Ownership/Deed of Trust
O Leasehold
Adivity ll
City or Other Precise Location of Real Property
0 Stock
__J__J 07
DISPOSED
0 Pwtnership
T RU ST
IX! Other _
__ _ _ _____
Yrs, remaining
0 Check box if additional schedules reporting investments or real property

are attached
FAIR MARKET VALUE

0 $2.000 - $10,000
0 $10,001 - $100,000
IXl $100,001 - $1,000,000
0 Over $1,000.000
IF APPLICABLE. LIST DATE.

__J__J 07
ACQUIRED
NATURE OF INTEREST
Q Property Ownership/Deed of Trust
0 Leasehold
Yrs. reminir\ij
0 Stock
__/__/. 07
DISPOSED
Q Partnership
!Kl Other ROLL OVER IRA
0 Check box if additional schedules reporting investments or real property

are attached
Comments=-------
FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008) Sch. A-2

FPPC Toll.free Helpline: 866/ASK..fPPC
SOCIOECONOMIC BIAS IN THE JUDICIARY

MICHELE BENEDETTO NEITZ*
ABSTRACT
Judges hold a prestigious place in our judicial system, and they earn double the
income of the average American household.
How does the privileged
socioeconomic status of judges affect their decisions on the bench? This Article
examines the ethical implications of what Ninth Circuit Chief Judge Alex Kozinski
recently called the unselfconscious cultural elitism of judges.** This elitism can
manifest as implicit socioeconomic bias.
Despite the attention paid to income inequality, implicit bias research and
judicial bias, no other scholar to date has fully examined the ramifications of implicit
socioeconomic bias on the bench. The Article explains that socioeconomic bias may
be more obscure than other forms of bias, but its impact on judicial decision-making
processes can create very real harm for disadvantaged populations. The Article
reviews social science studies confirming that implicit bias can be prevalent even in
people who profess to hold no explicit prejudices. Thus, even those judges who
believe their wealthy backgrounds play no role in their judicial deliberations may be
influenced by implicit socioeconomic bias. The Article verifies the existence of
implicit socioeconomic bias on the part of judges through examination of recent
Fourth Amendment and child custody cases. These cases reveal that judges can and
do favor wealthy litigants over those living in poverty, with significant negative
consequences for low-income people.
The Article contends that the American Bar Association (ABA) Model Code of
Judicial Conduct (the Code), the document designed to regulate the behavior of
judges, fails to effectively eliminate implicit socioeconomic bias. The Article
recommends innovative revisions designed to strengthen the Codes prohibition
against bias, and suggests improvements to judicial training materials in this context.
These changes will serve to increase judicial awareness of the potential for implicit
socioeconomic bias in their judicial decisions, and will bring this issue to the
forefront of the judicial agenda.
Professor of Law, Golden Gate University School of Law, San Francisco, California.
The author served as a law clerk for the Honorable Napoleon A. Jones, Jr., in the Southern
District of California. I am grateful to Professor Deborah L. Rhode, Professor Eric C.
Christiansen, Professor Kathleen Morris and Jennifer Pesetsky for their thoughtful comments
on earlier drafts. I appreciate the assistance of research assistants Sharon Alkire and Richard
Hullinger. This Article is dedicated to Wiley Neitz.
** United States v. Pineda-Moreno, 617 F.3d 1120, 1123 (9th Cir. 2010) (Kozinski, C.J.,
dissenting).
137

Published by EngagedScholarship@CSU, 2013
CJBNS.ORG
1
138
CLEVELAND STATE LAW REVIEW
[Vol. 61:137
I. INTRODUCTION .................................................................... 138

II. THE CHALLENGES OF IDENTIFYING IMPLICIT
SOCIOECONOMIC BIAS ......................................................... 142
A. The Economic Status of Judges ................................... 142
B. Socioeconomic Bias vs. Class Privilege ...................... 143
C. The Challenge of Identifying Socioeconomic Bias ...... 144
1. The ABA Model Code of Judicial
Conducts Prohibition of Socioeconomic Bias .... 144
2. The Unique Nature of Socioeconomic Bias ......... 146
3. The Challenge of Identifying Implicit Bias .......... 149
i. The Implicit Association Test ........................ 150
ii. How Can We Measure Implicit
Socioeconomic Bias? .................................... 152
III. IMPLICIT SOCIOECONOMIC BIAS IN FOURTH
AMENDMENT AND CHILD CUSTODY CASES ......................... 154
A. Implicit Socioeconomic Bias in Fourth
Amendment Cases ........................................................ 154
B. Implicit Socioeconomic Bias and Child
Custody Determinations .............................................. 158
IV. PROPOSED RECOMMENDATIONS .......................................... 161
A. Judicial Discipline: An Ineffective Solution ................ 161
B. Clarifying the ABA Model Code of Judicial
Conduct........................................................................ 162
C. Judicial Trainings ........................................................ 163
V. CONCLUSION ....................................................................... 165
I. INTRODUCTION
In the early 1970s, Robert William Kras asked the United States Supreme Court
to allow him to proceed in bankruptcy court without paying the requisite filing fees.1
Mr. Kras lived in a small apartment with multiple extended family members and his
younger child was hospitalized with cystic fibrosis.2 Mr. Kras had been unemployed
for several years, after losing his job with a life insurance company when the
premiums he had collected were stolen out of his home.3 His wife had to give up her
employment due to her pregnancy, and she was focused on caring for their ill son.
The family lived on public assistance benefits and had no real assets.4
United States v. Kras, 409 U.S. 434, 437 (1973).
Id.
Id.
Id. at 438.
http://engagedscholarship.csuohio.edu/clevstlrev/vol61/iss1/6
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
CJBNS.ORG
CALIFORNIA CODE OF JUDICIAL ETHICS
Amended by the Supreme Court of California effective August, 19, 2015; adopted
effective January 15, 1996; previously amended March 4, 1999, December 13, 2000,
December 30, 2002, June 18, 2003, December 22, 2003, January 1, 2005, June 1, 2005,
July 1, 2006, January 1, 2007, January 1, 2008, April 29, 2009, January 1, 2013, and
January 21, 2015.
Preface
Preamble
Terminology
Canon 1. A judge shall uphold the integrity and independence of the judiciary.
Canon 2. A judge shall avoid impropriety and the appearance of impropriety in
all of the judges activities.
Canon 3. A judge shall perform the duties of judicial office impartially, competently,
and diligently.
Canon 4. A judge shall so conduct the judges quasi-judicial and extrajudicial
activities as to minimize the risk of conflict with judicial obligations.
Canon 5. A judge or candidate for judicial office shall not engage in political or
campaign activity that is inconsistent with the independence, integrity, or impartiality
of the judiciary.
Canon 6. Compliance with the Code of Judicial Ethics.
CANON 3
A JUDGE SHALL PERFORM THE DUTIES OF JUDICIAL
OFFICE IMPARTIALLY AND DILIGENTLY
A. Judicial Duties in General
All of the judicial duties prescribed by law* shall take precedence over
all other activities of every judge. In the performance of these duties, the
following standards apply.
B. Adjudicative Responsibilities
(1) A judge shall hear and decide all matters assigned to the judge
except those in which he or she is disqualified.
ADVISORY COMMITTEE COMMENTARY
Canon 3B(1) is based upon the affirmative obligation contained in the
Code of Civil Procedure.
(2) A judge shall be faithful to the law* regardless of partisan interests,
public clamor, or fear of criticism, and shall maintain professional
competence in the law.*
(3) A judge shall require* order and decorum in proceedings before
the judge.
(4) A judge shall be patient, dignified, and courteous to litigants,
jurors, witnesses, lawyers, and others with whom the judge deals in an official
capacity, and shall require* similar conduct of lawyers and of all court staff
and personnel* under the judge's direction and control.
(5) A judge shall perform judicial duties without bias or prejudice. A
judge shall not, in the performance of judicial duties, engage in speech,
gestures, or other conduct that would reasonably be perceived as (1) bias or
prejudice, including but not limited to bias or prejudice based upon race, sex,
religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic
status, or (2) sexual harassment.
(Canon 3B (5) amended effective December 22, 2003.)
(6) A judge shall require* lawyers in proceedings before the judge to
refrain from manifesting, by words or conduct, bias or prejudice based upon
11
CANON 3
the judge.
11
CANON 3
the judge.
11
race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or

socioeconomic status against parties, witnesses, counsel, or others. This
Canon does not preclude legitimate advocacy when race, sex, religion,
national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, socioeconomic status or
other similar factors are issues in the proceeding.
(7) A judge shall accord to every person who has a legal interest in a
proceeding, or that person's lawyer, full right to be heard according to law.*
A judge shall not initiate, permit, or consider ex parte communications, or
consider other communications made to the judge outside the presence of the
parties concerning a pending or impending proceeding, except as follows:
(a) A judge may obtain the advice of a disinterested expert on the law*
applicable to a proceeding before the judge if the judge gives notice to the
parties of the person consulted and the substance of the advice, and affords
the parties reasonable opportunity to respond.
(b) A judge may consult with court personnel* whose function is to aid
the judge in carrying out the judge's adjudicative responsibilities or with
other judges.
(c) A judge may, with the consent of the parties, confer separately with
the parties and their lawyers in an effort to mediate or settle matters pending
before the judge.
(d) A judge may initiate ex parte communications, where
circumstances require, for scheduling, administrative purposes, or
emergencies that do not deal with substantive matters provided:
(i) the judge reasonably believes that no party will gain a
procedural or tactical advantage as a result of the ex parte communication,
and
(ii) the judge makes provision promptly to notify all other
parties of the substance of the ex parte communication and allows an
opportunity to respond.
(e) A judge may initiate or consider any ex parte communication when
expressly authorized by law* to do so.
12
(9) A judge shall not make any public comment about a pending or
impending proceeding in any court, and shall not make any nonpublic
comment that might substantially interfere with a fair trial or hearing. The
judge shall require* similar abstention on the part of court personnel*
subject to the judge's direction and control. This Canon does not prohibit
judges from making statements in the course of their official duties or from
explaining for public information the procedures of the court, and does not
apply to proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity.
Other than cases in which the judge has personally participated, this Canon
does not prohibit judges from discussing in legal education programs and
materials, cases and issues pending in appellate courts. This educational
exemption does not apply to cases over which the judge has presided or to
comments or discussions that might interfere with a fair hearing of the case.
The requirement that judges abstain from public comment regarding a
pending or impending proceeding continues during any appellate process and
until final disposition. This Canon does not prohibit a judge from commenting on
proceedings in which the judge is a litigant in a personal capacity, but in cases
such as a writ of mandamus where the judge is a litigant in an official capacity,
the judge must not comment publicly.
(10) A judge shall not commend or criticize jurors for their verdict
other than in a court order or opinion in a proceeding, but may express
appreciation to jurors for their service to the judicial system and the
community.
Commending
or criticizing jurors for their verdict may imply a judicial
expectation in future cases and may impair a juror's ability to be fair and
impartial in a subsequent case.
(11) A judge shall not disclose or use, for any purpose unrelated to
judicial duties, nonpublic information* acquired in a judicial capacity.
This Canon makes it clear that judges cannot make use of information from
affidavits, jury results, or court rulings, before they become public information, in
order to gain a personal advantage.
C. Administrative Responsibilities
14
(1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge's administrative

responsibilities impartially, on the basis of merit, without bias or prejudice,
free of conflict of interest, and in a manner that promotes public confidence
in the integrity of the judiciary. A judge shall maintain professional
competence in judicial administration, and shall cooperate with other judges
and court officials in the administration of court business.
In considering what constitutes a conflict of interest under this Canon, a
judge should be informed by Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1(a)(6).
(Canon 3C(1) amended effective April 29, 2009.)
(2) A judge shall require* staff and court personnel* under the judge's
direction and control to observe appropriate standards of conduct and to
refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion,
national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status in
the performance of their official duties.
(3) A judge with supervisory authority for the judicial performance of
other judges shall take reasonable measures to ensure the prompt disposition
of matters before them and the proper performance of their other judicial
responsibilities.
(4) A judge shall not make unnecessary court appointments. A judge
shall exercise the power of appointment impartially and on the basis of merit.
A judge shall avoid nepotism and favoritism. A judge shall not approve
compensation of appointees above the reasonable value of services rendered.
Appointees of a judge include assigned counsel, officials such as referees,
commissioners, special masters, receivers, and guardians, and personnel such as
clerks, secretaries, court reporters, court interpreters, and bailiffs. Consent by the
parties to an appointment or an award of compensation does not relieve the judge
of the obligation prescribed by Canon 3C(4).
(5) A judge shall perform administrative duties without bias or
prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of administrative duties,
engage in speech, gestures, or other conduct that would reasonably be
perceived as (1) bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or
prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual
orientation, or socioeconomic status, or (2) sexual harassment.
15
(1) A judge shall diligently discharge the judge's administrative

responsibilities impartially, on the basis of merit, without bias or prejudice,
free of conflict of interest, and in a manner that promotes public confidence
in the integrity of the judiciary. A judge shall maintain professional
competence in judicial administration, and shall cooperate with other judges
and court officials in the administration of court business.
In considering what constitutes a conflict of interest under this Canon, a
judge should be informed by Code of Civil Procedure section 170.1(a)(6).
(Canon 3C(1) amended effective April 29, 2009.)
(2) A judge shall require* staff and court personnel* under the judge's
direction and control to observe appropriate standards of conduct and to
refrain from manifesting bias or prejudice based upon race, sex, religion,
national origin, disability, age, sexual orientation, or socioeconomic status in
the performance of their official duties.
(3) A judge with supervisory authority for the judicial performance of
other judges shall take reasonable measures to ensure the prompt disposition
of matters before them and the proper performance of their other judicial
responsibilities.
(4) A judge shall not make unnecessary court appointments. A judge
shall exercise the power of appointment impartially and on the basis of merit.
A judge shall avoid nepotism and favoritism. A judge shall not approve
compensation of appointees above the reasonable value of services rendered.
Appointees of a judge include assigned counsel, officials such as referees,
commissioners, special masters, receivers, and guardians, and personnel such as
clerks, secretaries, court reporters, court interpreters, and bailiffs. Consent by the
parties to an appointment or an award of compensation does not relieve the judge
of the obligation prescribed by Canon 3C(4).
(5) A judge shall perform administrative duties without bias or
prejudice. A judge shall not, in the performance of administrative duties,
engage in speech, gestures, or other conduct that would reasonably be
perceived as (1) bias or prejudice, including but not limited to bias or
prejudice based upon race, sex, religion, national origin, disability, age, sexual
orientation, or socioeconomic status, or (2) sexual harassment.
15
JUDGE
MARY ANN 5. GRILLI
SUPERI OR COURT O F CALI FORN IA
COUNTY OF SAN TA CLARA
f.B0 FiOiii
l Liiili E
all the help she received from court
........
..
..
staff. She hopes to adapt some proce
....
dures in probate court when she returns
to family court, such as having a court

staff person who takes "notes" on each
Elected judge of Santa
case so, in ongoing proceedings, the
Clara
judge knows the history of what has
County Superior Court, 1996; Superior

Court commissioner,
happened before.
1993-96; sole
"It's a very varied calendar," Grilli
practitioner, 1987-93; attorney in part
said
nership with John Miller and Jerry
of her
current
assignment.
It
includes not just traditional probate
Berg,1973-87
work and conservatorships but also
Age 62
adoptions and guardianships.

"There are a lot more lawyers than
By Craig Anderson
in family court," she said.
Daily Journal Staff Writer
A native of Ithaca, N.Y., Grilli
SAN JOSE - Santa Clara County
grew up in Baton Rouge, La., the
Superior Court Judge Mary Ann Grilli,

a veteran of family court both as
daughter of a Louisiana State University
an
professor of animal breeding and genet
attorney and a judge, will be heading
ics. She was taking pre-med classes at
back there in January after spending
the University of California, Berkeley,
two-and-a-half years handling probate
when she decided it was not for her and
matters.
Probate lawyers say they are going
to miss her.
"She is everything a judge should
be," said Michael Desmarais, a veteran
that the law interested her a lot more.

Grilli
success to her experience in the rough
majored
in
criminology,
and-tumble atmosphere of family court,
graduating in 1968, the same year she
where parents wage emotional battles
married John Grilli, whom she met
Los Gatos attorney. "She has empathy,
over money and their children, often
when they were working as switchboard
patience
without lawyers.
operators at their dormitory.
and
intelligence.
She
has
shown me enormous patience and has
In conservatorship cases, parents
She attended night classes at Santa
actually tried to lead me into realizing
often disagree about how to deal with
Clara University School of Law and had
that I don't know it all in my area of spe
their young adult children with disabili
two children. The night program lasted
cialty. And she has done so very tactful
ties - a situation not dissimilar from
four years, and Grilli graduated in 1973.
arguments that rage in family court
She worked part-time for three years
ly."
Desmarais said probate attorneys
between divorcing spouses. In other
until starting full-time in 1976, working
tried, without success, to persuade the
cases, it is the parent who needs care,
with John Miller and Jerry Berg at a
court to keep her on the probate calen
with children and new spouses at odds.
family and criminal law firm where she
dar, which speaks to how well she has
"The judge's experience in family
managed to overcome her own limited
law gives her substantial sensitivity in
experience in that area of the law.
the conservatorship field," Stem said.
became a partner in the early 1980s.

Her two children are adults now,
and Grilli has six grandchildren.
"When we have a judge who has
After a career in family court, as a
Grilli specialized in family law,
not done probate before, there is always
lawyer and then a commissioner and
and started her own practice in Palo
concern about how that person will
finally a judge, Grilli said she is happy
Alto in 1987. Six years later, the judges
work out," said Palo Alto attorney Peter
to have made the switch to probate
of Santa Clara County Superior Court
Stern. "I think things have worked out
court. But, she adds, "I'm happy to be
appointed her a commissioner. She han
very well."
going back."
dled family law, child support and

domestic violence.
Stern and other lawyers say Grilli,
The judge said she had to learn
62, has the legal chops to understand the
about conservatorships - not just the law
In 1996, Grilli ran for an open seat
ins and outs of wills, trusts, and conser
but also the practical reality - by visiting
on the Superior Court bench, defeating
vatorship dispt1tes that come up on her
elder facilities.
defense attorney Thomas Spielbauer.
calendar, but also the temperament and

experience to deal with the emotional
issues that arise: in contested cases.
Several attorneys attributed G1illi's
Daily Journal Corporation
"I learned a lot about politics," she
"I went to places to see what it is

like," she said.
said.
Grilli has enjoyed her time in pro
Grilli, who took office the next
bate court, saying she has appreciated
year, found herself dealing with protests
2010-1
JUDGE MARY ANN S. GRILLI, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
and acrimony over the way Santa Clara
bate
County family court judges handled

divorce and custody cases.
She was not the primary target of
protesters' vitiiol, and attorneys who
were among the court's critics back then
Attorneys:
Ellen McKissock,
Hopkins & Carley, San Jose; John
Posthauer, Santa Clara county counsel's
office; and Sheri Sudweeks, Los Gatos
say they are happy about her return.

"She's
known
quantity
and
knows the law backwards and for

wards," said Los Gatos family law attor
ney Robin Yeamans.
While some attorneys say it is bet
ter for judges to get switched away from
family court to avoid burnout, Grilli
bristles at the suggestion. She points out
that many judges who handle criminal
calendars have spent virtually their
entire careers as prosecutors or criminal
defense attorneys before joining the
bench.
"That question doesn't get asked
[of them]," she said.
Desmarais said Grilli's courtroom
can get very crowded, with as many as
a dozen attorneys representing various
factions of an extended family in dis
putes over living trusts.
"Lawyers are getting angry and
clients are getting angry," Desmarais
said. "A lot of judges would let some of
that anger seep through. She doesn't."
Jack Coward, a Los Gatos sole
practitioner, said Grilli is always pre
. pared and efficient in moving through
her calendar.
"She's fair and will let the lawyers
present and argue their case," Coward
said. "When there's a repetition of the
argument, she will rein them in."
Grilli said she is proud of her role
in promoting a program to encourage
low- and no-cost representation for
guardians of children, known as the
Guardianship Access Program, and
hopes to create a similar program in
family court.
- In re Conservatorship. of Frank
Reed, l-07-PR-161658 - conservator
ship
Attorneys: Mark Gonzalez, Santa
Clara county counsel's office; Vincent
Kilduff, San Jose; and Sung Lee, Santa
Clara County public defender's office
- In re Conservatorship of Diana P.,
l -07-PR-162463 conservatorship
Attorneys: Rebecca Weisman,
Fleishman & Weisman, San Jose, and
Howard Frank, Frank Law Firm, San
Jose
This profile originally appeared in

the Los Angeles Daily Journal and the
San Francisco Daily Journal December
29, 2009.
Here are some of Judge Grilli's

recent cases and the lawyers involved:
- Dantzig Trust, l -05-PR-156777 living trust

Attorneys: Jack Coward, Los
Gatos; Peter Stern, Palo Alto, and
Terrance Heath, Heath Law Group, San
Francisco
- Raffanti Living Trnst, l-08-PR163480 - living trust
Attorneys: Paul Breen, Hoge,
Fenton, Jones & Appel, San Jose, and
Michael Desmarais, Los Gatos
- In re Co:nservatorship of Gary B.,
l-97-PR-141989 - conservatorship/pro2010-1
------ -
.JUDGE MARY_ANN S. GRILLI, SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA COUNTY OF SANTA CLARA
BIOGRAPHY
CURRENT ASSIGNMENT
1990-present: Academy of Family

Mediators
Court: Superior Court of California

County of Santa Clara
1983-1993: Santa Clara County Bar
Association (Family Law
Title: Judge
Executive Committee)
1973-present: Admitted to California
Bar
Pafo Alto Area Bar Association
(President)
Dates: 1997 to Present

Status: Elevated
Appointed by: Election
Date: March 1, 1996
PREV IOUS JUDICIAL
PERSONAL HISTORY
APPOINTMENTS
Status: Appointed
Appointed by: Court
Date: November 1, 1992
EDUCATION
Law School: Santa Clara University

School of Law
Location: Santa Clara, CA
Date: 1973
Degree: J.D.
Honors: Magna cum laude
College: UC Berkeley
Location: Berkeley, CA
Date: 1968
Degree: B.A. Criminology
PRACTICE HIS TORY
Birthplace: Ithaca, NY
Sex: F
Spouse: John Grilli
Religion: Jewish
Political Affiliation: Democrat
Recreation: Hiking, cooking
MILITARY
OTHER
Continuing Education Taught: Child

Support LegiSlation, 1992
Continuing Education Taught:
Trying a Family Law Case, San
Jose 1980, 1982
Moderator, CEB program, "Dividing
Property on Dissolution of
Marriage," 1994
Sole Practitioner
Location: Palo Alto, CA
From: 1988 to 1992
Specialty: Family Law
In partnership with Attorney John
Miller
From: 1978 to 1988
Specialty: Family and Criminal Law
Matters
Assoicate of Attorney Jerry Berg
From: 1973 to 1978
Specialty: Family and Criminal Law
Matters
BARS AND RELATED
PROFESSIONAL ACTIVITIES
1996-present: Judicial Council

Family and Juvenile Advisory
Committee
1994-present: Domestic Violence
Council, Santa Clara County
(Chair)
20101

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

CALIFORNIA FORM

cS:TiA'llEMENT OF ECONOMIC INTERESTS

FAIR P01 ll CAL PRAC-:'!CES cor.1. SS 01

2008 FEB I 9 AH 9: Ji3Public Document

Please type or print in ink

SANTA CLARA COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT

- If filing for multiple positions, list additional agency(ies)/

(Check at least one box)

Iii Yes - schedule attached

Income, Loans, & Business Positions (Income 011ter than Gills

Annual: The period covered is January

-orThe period covered is --. through

No reportable interests on any schedule

(Check at least one box)

The period covered is January

Income - Travel Payments

Investments (Less than 10% Ownership)

I have disclosed interests on one or more of the

SUPERIOR COURT JUDGE

- Total number of pages

- Check applicable schedules or "No reportable

Name of Office, Agency, or Court:

DAYTIME TELEPHONE NUMBER

(monlh, day year)

The period covered is --. through

FPPC Form 700 (2007/2008)

CALIFORNIA JUDICIAL BRANCH NEWS SERVICE

Stocks, Bonds, and Other Interests

MARY ANN GRILLI

(Ownership Interest is Less Than 10%}

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY

FAIR MARKET VALUE

FAIR MARKET VALUE

IF APPLICABLE. LIST DATE:

IF APPLICABLE. LIST DATE:

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY

!Kl $10,001 $100,000

PROCTER & GAMBLE

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY

FAIR MARKET VALUE

IX] $10,001 - $100,000

IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATE:

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATE:

FAIR MARKET VALUE

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS ACTIVITY

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

FAIR MARKET VALUE

IF APPLICABLE, LIST DATE:

00 $10 001 $100,000

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

FAlq POlIT CAL PRAc1cES CO'N111S!) ON

FPPC Form 7DO (20D7/2D08) Sch. A-1

Stocks, Bonds, and Other Interests

MARY ANN GRILLI

(Ownership Interest is Less Than 10%)

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

FAIR MARKET VALUE

FAIR MARKET VALUE

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY

!RI $10,001 $100,000

NAME OF BUSINESS ENTITY