Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Analysis
work
Tutorial 7 - Class-
Current ratio
Acid-test ratio
Receivables turnover
Inventory turnover
Creditors turnover
Debt to total assets
Times Interest Earned
Cash debt coverage
2012
2013
2014
3.8
1.6
8.7 times
24.3 times
20.3 times
0.42
5.8 times
120%
3.4
1.5
9.4 times
24.3 times
12.2 times
0.48
4.5 times
103%
2.8
1.1
10.1 times
28.1 times
8.1 times
0.65
3.2 times
78%
The Current ratio shows how many dollars of current assets are available
to cover current liabilities. A higher figure is generally better and a suggested
minimum of around 2:1 is desirable for a new business. The analysis shows the
current ratio deteriorating over the three year period. If the trend continues, it
may fall below the desired minimum level. This is not a good trend.
The Acid-test ratio shows how many dollars of quick assets are available
to pay the most urgent liabilities. Inventory and prepaid expenses are excluded
as they are not considered to be assets that can be quickly converted into cash.
Again, a higher figure is generally better, with a suggested minimum of at least
1:1 for a new business. The XYZ Company analysis shows this ratio is on a
decreasing trend, with the most current year very close to the minimum desired
level of 1. If the trend continues, it appears likely that the company may
experience liquidity problems which may lead to solvency problems (i.e. an
inability to pay debts in full by due date.)
The Cash Debt Coverage ratio indicates the percentage of cash flows
from operating activities per dollar of liabilities of an entity. For XYZ Company
this has declined considerably. In 2012, the company had 120% of liabilities
covered by cash flows from operating activities. This has decreased to just 78%
in 2014. This is consistent with the additional borrowings.
2008
$ 300,000
$ 800,000
400,000 (issued at $
2.00)
$ 100,000
$ 3.20
$ 700,000
$ 1,500,000
2009
$ 330,000
$ 1,200,000
600,000 (issued at $
2.00)
$ 100,000
$ 3.40
$ 300,000
$ 1,500,000
0.47
0.33
0.375
0.20
0.30
0.275
the performance
2008
0.52
2009
0.58
6.5
5.3
0.08
0.11
Return on Assets has been improving over the period indicating that the
business is making more profit from the assets used in the business. The higher,
the better for this ratio as businesses should use assets efficiently to generate
reasonable returns. The result for this ratio is improving.
Asset (Sales) Turnover has declined considerably over the three years
which is not a favourable trend. This ratio indicates that the amount of revenue
generated per dollar of assets has fallen. The decline for this business means
that is less efficient in using its assets to make sales.
Return on Sales has increased over the period indicating the business is
making more profit from every dollar of revenue earned. This is surprising as
Asset (sales) turnover indicated less efficiency. The business may have lost sales
overall, but either increased selling price or reduced expenses to compensate.
(b) A sole trader business that offers a lawn mowing and gardening service has
the following information for the year:
Revenue
Net profit before interest and tax
Average total assets
Return on Assets
$ 78,000
$ 52,000
$ 26,000
Sales Turnover
Return on Sales
2.0
3.0
0.67
Discuss why these results are so much higher than the company analysed in the
previous exercise, and whether the returns are adequate.
An analysis of ABC Company is very difficult as so little information has
been provided. There is a need to compare this information to benchmarks
(previous years results, competitors results, industry averages, etc.) to get a
better idea of performance.
This is a small business with few non-current assets used to generate
profits. It is a labour intensive entity where the more the owner works, the more
profit he/she can earn with the same assets. The owner is earning twice as much
profit as the value of assets, and three times as much revenue as the value of
assets. These returns are very good, indicating efficient use of the assets of the
business to generate profits. Return on sales indicates that the business earns
around 67% profit from every dollar of revenue generated, with only 33% of
revenue used to cover expenses.
While the ratios appear to be excellent, compared to DEF Company in
example (a), the ratios cannot incorporate the many hours of work contributed
by the owner to achieve these results. Would it be better to work for someone
and earn this amount as a salary? Would the owner prefer to be an employee
with guaranteed wages rather than have the stress of wondering whether the
business will succeed and trying to find ways to generate more revenue?
Question 4
A (1) What do the ratios suggest about the companies respective profitability?
The Return on Equity (ROE) of each company exceeds the Return on Assets
(ROA) of that specific company.
Infomedia has the highest ROE and ROA of the companies. MYOB has the
highest asset turnover This indicates that it utilises its assets more efficiently to
generate sales. However, MYOB has a lower profit margin and this is negatively
affecting the ROA.
Computershare has a lower asset turnover, but a higher profit margin, than
MYOB. This could indicate that it controls its expenses better or is able to
achieve higher gross margins, but it needs to work on the efficient use of its
assets.
A (2) What do the ratios suggest about the companies respective short
term position?
Infomedias days inventory and days receivables are extremely high. This
could reflect differences in the nature of the assets held. For example,
Infomedias inventory may include specialist software for the car industry that
may take longer to produce. Funds invested in inventory and debtors are earning
a zero rate of return, so it is advantageous for an entity to turn over its inventory
and debtors as quickly as possible. Higher days inventory and days debtors
generally reflect poor management efficiency.
A (3) What do the ratios suggest about the companies respective longterm financial structure?
The debt to equity ratio indicates how many dollars of debt exist per dollar of
equity financing. If this ratio exceeds 100 per cent, then the entity is more reliant
on debt funding that equity funding. Informedias debt to equity ratio is the
highest and MYOBs debt to equity ratio is the lowest. However, for all companies
less debt financing is used to fund assets relative to equity financing. Effective
use of debt (e.g. using borrowed funds to acquire assets that return more than
the cost of funds) will have a positive impact on ROE.
B Explain any limitations to the analysis and any additional information,
which could assist in making a more reliable assessment.
This exercise involves an analysis of ratios across companies in the same
industry. When comparing ratios across companies or within the same company
over time, attention needs to be given to each entitys accounting policy
choices. For example, the lower ROA for MYOB could be due to a policy of fair
valuing property, plant and equipment (PPE) whereas the other entities may
measure PPE at cost.
Consideration should also be given to the differences between the companies
including their different strategic directions. MYOB is selling software to a variety
of industries. Computershare provides services to a diverse range of companies
on the stock exchange. Infomedia provides software for the automotive industry
and so is a far more specialised company.
Information is necessary about past (historic) and forecasted performance.
Results for one period may not be typical and are subject to the limitations of
attempting to measure flow concepts with static information. Information over as
many as five periods may reduce the effect of the limitations of static
information.
Also, the companys long term liability increased by over 50% over
the previous year. This indicates that more of the current assets are
funded by debt rather than by current liabilities. From the liquidity
point of view this is good, but it may have an impact on profitability
and risk.
The solvency of the company has been hit adversely as can be seen
by the decline in the Debt to Assets ratio which increased from 54%
to 56.3% in 2014. By itself it is not a very disturbing, but combined
with the falling sales for the year and a deep dip in the Interest
cover, it shows a likely failure to meet financial obligations in future
if difficult conditions continue.
(a)
(b)
The risks for the company have gone up. The financial leveraging
which improved the liquidity of the firm also caused interest liability
to go up, hit the interest coverage, and could possibly make debt
servicing difficult in future.
(c)
Question 7
2013
2014
(a)
Current
Acid-test
1.4 : 1
1.5 : 1
0.82 : 1
0.90 : 1
Receivables
Turnover
7.5 times
7.2 times
Inventory
Turnover
5.2 times
5.4 times
The acid-test ratio better measures immediate short term liquidity as it excludes inventory and
prepayments current assets that are not always readily exchangeable for cash. The company has a
ratio of 90 cents in 2014, an increase of 8 cents since 2013. This means that while all immediate
liabilities may not be paid with existing quick assets, the ratio is closer to 1 than it was previously.
This is a positive trend.
The receivables turnover assesses how frequently accounts receivable amounts are collected in a year.
The more often they are collected, the better the liquidity. In Outside Inns situation, this ratio has
deteriorated slightly as the turnover has decreased from 7.5 to 7.2 times per year. The company may
need to monitor the behaviour of debtors.
The inventory turnover illustrates how many times inventory is sold during the year. The company
was selling inventory at an average of 5.2 times per year in 2013 which improved to 5.4 times in
2014. This is a positive trend. It may have come about from promotions, sales or other price
reductions.
Question 8
Normally Debt to Assets ratios and Interest coverage (earned) ratios are inverse
that is an increase in one ratio leads to a decrease in the other ratio and vice
versa. The Manager of YM Company noticed that the debt to asset ratio over the
past two years has decreased from 71% to 60% and during the same period the
interest coverage ratio has also decreased from 4.9 times to 3.1 times. He has
asked you as the Accountant to explain to him why this could happen.
There may be many reasons why this may occur including:
A decrease in profit has occurred
A decrease in debt may be due to repayment of non interest bearing liabilities (eg creditors)
An increase in interest rates paid on borrowings
A repayment of a loan may have happened at the end of the period which would have
minimal affect on the interest paid for the period