You are on page 1of 11

GUN CONTROL: NOT WHAT IT SEEMS

By Dr. William L. Pierce - PUBLISHED BY MICHAEL OLANICH, ON OCTOBER 24TH, 2015


===============================================
(a speech given by Dr. Pierce on the nationwide radio program, American Dissident
Voices, January 29th, 1994)
THERE IS HARDLY AN ISSUE which more sharply divides White Americans than gun
control. There is hardly a more significant difference than that which exists between
the people who want gun control and those who dont. For there is a great
temperamental and ideological divide between those who believe in self-defense and
those who believe in surrendering and begging for mercy.
Looking at this from the standpoint of temperament: It may seem unfair to women to
categorize the tendency to surrender as feminine and the tendency to defend oneself
as masculine, but at a very fundamental level this categorization corresponds to real
differences between feminine and masculine natures. Every person has some of the
feminine nature and some of the masculine nature in his character. What we see today
is a much greater than normal manifestation of feminine traits in men. It is not a pretty
sight.
And we can look at this divide from the standpoint of ideology: Except for a relatively
small minority of very sick persons who actually relish the idea of surrender and
fantasize about being victimized, those who choose to give up their arms are hoping to
be protected by the government. They trust the government. They believe the
government has their best interests at heart. They think of the government as a friend
and generally approve of the governments policies.
This divide becomes deeper and wider by the day. A Black with an uncontrollable
hatred of Whites opens fire on a crowded subway train in New York, killing five Whites
and injuring 17 more. Gun control advocates see this massacre as support for their
position. A gun killed and wounded those people, they say. If we get rid of all the
guns, then Blacks and Whites will not be able to kill each other. And people on their
side of the divide believe them and clamor for the confiscation of guns. At the same
time people on the other side of the divide rush to gun stores, determined that they will
be prepared to defend themselves if any White-hating Black ever threatens them or
their families.
Now, this divide certainly didnt exist a century ago. Then every White man was armed,
and every woman expected him to be. In that more civilized age violent crime was a
minute fraction of what it is today. People could walk the streets of their cities at night
and, in most places, leave their doors unlocked without fear. The government interfered
relatively little in peoples lives. Most communities had police, but a mans right to
defend himself, his family, and his property was absolute.
WHAT CAUSED PEOPLES ATTITUDES TO CHANGE SO RADICALLY?

Well, there are a number of reasons: A century ago the country was substantially less
urban than it is now. People living in small towns and rural areas always are more selfreliant and independent, on the average, than city dwellers. Rural people live a little
more naturally, a little closer to Nature. They do not depend on the elaborate
infrastructure of the city, which provides garbage collection, public transportation,
shelters for the homeless, and a thousand other protections and shields against the
natural world. Even little things, like drawing water from ones own well and chopping
ones own firewood for winter warmth, give one a sense of reality and self-sufficiency
that most urbanites and suburbanites lack. As the nations population became more
urban during the past century it also became less self-reliant.
Another reason is that until 1920 only men voted in the United States. To the extent
that politicians and government are responsive to the feelings of the electorate, the
government was much less inclined before 1920 to assume the role of a protective
mother than it was after women began to vote. Although women voters are by no
means uniform in their sentiments or their voting preferences, they are on the average
substantially more wet, in the ideological sense, than men. At the most basic,
instinctive level, self-defense is an alien concept to women, and since 1920 their votes
have helped to shift the burden of personal protection from the individual to the
government.
Then there is the fact that in the early years of North American settlement the flow of
immigrants was not only entirely White (not counting the slaves imported from Africa,
of course), but it consisted of a tougher, more independent breed than in recent years.
People came to America from Europe seeking freedom, adventure, or opportunity; but
certainly no one came looking for a handout, because everyone understood that there
were no handouts available. As the country became more urban, however, the stream
of immigrants began to include more of the wretched refuse of various teeming shores
yearning to receive welfare checks, and the politicians began looking to the public
treasury as a source of funds for buying votes. The consequence has been the growth
of an urban underclass of citizens dependent on the government in one way or another:
citizens who always are ready to increase their dependency on the government and to
trade freedom for the promise of more security.
THE MASS MEDIA HATE GUNS: HERES WHY
All three of the factors above have to do with the changing character of the U.S.
electorate, and they are important reasons for the declining fortunes of the Second
Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. They are dwarfed to insignificance by a fourth
factor, however, and that factor is the growth in the degree of influence on public
opinion of the Jews through their control of the mass media of information and
entertainment.
Both the Jewish control of the media and the media bias against the citizens right to
keep and bear arms are generally recognized but seldom discussed publicly, for fear of
the charge of anti-Semitism. Also manifest but inadequately publicized is the Jewish
leadership of the legislative drive to restrict or abolish the private ownership of
firearms. The names of the principal anti-Second Amendment legislators Feinstein,
Metzenbaum, Schumer tell part of the story, and the anti-gun lobbying

organizations, of which the Anti-Defamation League of Bnai Brith the ADL is the
most powerful, tell the rest.
When a group of concerned citizens or an association of mayors or chiefs of police
issues a statement to the press calling for the banning of firearms as a way of reducing
violence in Americas cities, a close examination nearly always will reveal the hidden
hand of the ADL. Especially insidious has been the ADLs use of local, state, and federal
police agencies as front groups. For the past two decades the ADL has been lobbying
actively for a group of what it calls model statutes restricting firearms ownership and
penalizing what it deems to be hate crimes perpetrated by Whites against members
of minority groups. Typically the ADL will have a police official or two in tow when it
shows up at a state legislature to lobby for one of these politically oriented laws.
The ADLs program to subvert police departments was revealed in late 1992 when a
San Francisco police inspector, Thomas Gerard, was arrested for illegally selling
confidential police investigative files to the ADL. Police searches of ADL offices in San
Francisco and Los Angeles in April of last year turned up evidence of widespread
corruption of police agencies around the country by the ADL. Brave indeed is the local
police chief who will turn away an ADL emissary who visits his office with a couple of
the communitys leading Jewish businessmen and requests the chiefs endorsement of
a model statute banning semiautomatic firearms.
Now, far less obvious than the fact of Jewish leadership of the drive to ban the private
ownership of firearms is the reason for this Jewish activity. The reason is the so-called
New World Order, a subject Ive spoken about several times before on American
Dissident Voices. To put it very briefly, the New World Order is a utopian system in
which the U.S. economy will be globalized, the wage levels of U.S. workers will be
brought down to those of workers in the Third World, national boundaries will for all
practical purposes cease to exist, an increased flow of Third World immigrants into the
United States will have produced a non-White majority in the country, and United
Nations peace keeping forces will be used to keep anyone from opting out of the
system.
To be sure, Jews are not the only ones behind this scheme for a New World Order. It
appeals to egalitarians, many of them Christians, who are tormented by the fact that
most of the population of the Third World lives in a state of perpetual squalor and
poverty. They really believe that the unfavorable condition of these non-White masses
is not due to any innate inferiority. They really believe that these masses can and
should be lifted up to a White level, and that its worth pulling the White living standard
down in order to equalize everyone. And, of course, it appeals to many people in the
upper echelons of Big Business, who are entranced by the prospect of paying lower
wages and exporting their goods to a bigger market. It was considerations of this sort
which gave us the unholy alliance of egalitarian ideologues and international capitalists
who backed the recently adopted North American Free Trade Agreement.
Equality and so-called free trade aside, one salient feature of the New World Order is
a greatly increased degree of centralization of power and of governmental control over
the lives of ordinary citizens. This means a greatly increased importance for the mass
media of news and entertainment. Whoever controls the mass media and is therefore
able to manipulate the attitudes and opinions of the great masses of people will, for all

practical purposes, be able to steer the course taken by the New World Order. This
helps us to understand the virtually unanimous enthusiasm of the Jews for the New
World Order.

NEW WORLD ORDER = A DISARMED AMERICA


There are two prerequisites for safely bringing in the New World Order. First, the people
who are not convinced that surrendering national sovereignty and permitting
themselves to be equalized with Chinas coolies and Mexicos peons are good things
must be silenced with hate laws designed to criminalize any expression of fact or
opinion which can be considered racist. Second, the same people must be disarmed,
so that they have no recourse but to obey the laws and remain silent.
In the United States the number of people likely to take up arms against an oppressive
government is not large at this time. We live in an age when comfort and safety are
valued more highly than freedom. If economic conditions worsen substantially,
however, those few willing to fight for freedom may persuade many others who are
more concerned with their pocketbooks than their honor to take up arms as well, and if
that happens the New World Order will be in serious trouble.
What all the foregoing means is that the present drive to disarm American citizens is
motivated by a fear of rebellion, not by a fear of crime.
The people in the media and the government beating the drums for the New World
Order understand that as the program of globalization proceeds, millions of newly
dispossessed citizens will be angry and desperate. If these citizens still have firearms in
their possession, they may strike at their despoilers.
Patriots need to understand this fact as well as their enemies do, and they must not be
bashful about stating it plainly and forcefully. They need to drop the pretense that the
purpose of the Second Amendment is to protect the rights of hunters, target shooters,
and collectors of antique firearms. When Congressman Schumer or Senator
Metzenbaum holds a semiautomatic rifle or pistol up for the television cameras and
says that no legitimate sportsman needs a weapon like this, he is laughing up his
sleeve at the same time.
The needs of sportsmen and hobbyists are utterly without importance or significance
when compared with the two serious needs served by the private ownership of
firearms: the need of the individual for weapons with which to protect his person, his
family, and his property against the growing hordes of criminals in our disintegrating
society; and the need of the patriot for weapons with which to keep governmental
tyranny in check.
AMERICAS PROBLEM: RACE, NOT GUNS
There is another very important dimension to the change which has brought Americans
to the point that so many of them are eager to surrender and beg for mercy. That is the
racial dimension and its relationship to the enormous increase in crime and violence in
America. Those who are able to remember America as it was three or four decades ago

remember a life as different from that of today as day is from night. There were no
drugs or gang violence in the schools. There were no drive-by shootings. Burglary and
armed robbery were so rare that when such a crime did occur it was the talk of the
town for months afterward. Listeners who find it difficult to believe that such an
America ever existed need only view a few motion pictures from the 1940s or early
1950s: Look at the crowds on the streets that you see in those films. Look at the
students on the university campuses. Look at the faces in the offices and factories. It
was a White America.
America prior to the 1960s was a vastly gentler and kinder country than it is today. The
drugs and violence endemic in the non-White community had not been permitted to
spread to the White community. White children still could play in fields or vacant lots
near their homes without fear. No one ever was killed or raped on a school playground.
But then the planners of the New World Order decided that the time had come to begin
transforming America, to begin getting it ready to fit into their scheme of things. Blacks
and Whites must be integrated, without regard for the consequences!
It is astonishing how easily White Americans permitted themselves to be dispossessed
in their own land. It is disgusting how many of them collaborated in the campaign of
genocide against their own people and still do. Of course, the New World Order boys
had an immensely powerful weapon in their hands by the 1960s, and they used it with
deadly skill: television. Americans let themselves be persuaded by the puppeteers
manipulating the images on their television screens that racial integration was
fashionable. And when the changes of the 1960s brought nothing but evil, White
Americans let themselves be persuaded that the cure for the evil was more change of
the same sort! If there is a just God in heaven, he must laugh in scorn when he hears
White Americans whining now about drugs and crime and violence and how they are
afraid for the future.
Crime and violence came to America as a direct and immediate consequence of the
loss of racial homogeneity in American society. When Blacks and other non-Whites were
released from their ghettos and came flooding into the White world they brought their
life-style of drugs, crime, and violence with them. And the attitudes and behavior of
Whites especially young Whites also changed. With the loss of racial and cultural
homogeneity went the loss of a sense of community. The world in which White boys
and girls were growing up became more alien, more hostile. It was no longer their
world. They no longer had a sense of family, of belonging. They no longer had clear
standards and models, no longer a clear image of what was expected of them. When
young Whites lost their sense of belonging in the chaotic, racially mixed world into
which they suddenly were thrust in the 1960s and 1970s, many of them also lost their
sense of responsibility to that world. Immorality, crime, and violence increased among
young Whites as among Blacks. It was a natural and inevitable consequence of the loss
of homogeneity.
So what do we do about this horrible increase in crime and violence which so frightens
people? Well, we might think about restoring the homogeneity and the sense of
community White Americans used to have. We might think about that, except that if we
said anything about it we would be immediately denounced by the controlled media as
racists. Now to the average TV-bred citizen, to be considered a racist is a fate worse

than death. He cannot blame the decline in the quality of American life on a loss of
homogeneity. He cannot blame racial mixing. Powerful taboos forbid it. And so he is
easily enough persuaded by the manipulators behind his television screen to blame
firearms instead.
The manipulators understand this psychology all too well, and they are exploiting it
fully in their campaign to disarm Americans. They are using the fear of soaring crime
and violence to stampede the frightened, unthinking voters into letting their only
means of protection from this crime and violence be taken away from them into
giving up their only means of settling scores with the manipulators of the media and
their collaborators in the government who have made such a cesspool of America.
Crime and violence can only increase, of course, because almost no one has the
courage and honesty to discuss their real causes, much less to do anything realistic
about cleaning up the mess that has been made of America. Therefore, the stampede
will continue until White Americans that is, the ones who obey all the laws have
been completely disarmed. Ill repeat that: The present campaign to disarm Americans
will not abate. Neither the controlled media nor the government will back away from a
goal of total disarmament of the civilian population. They wont reach this goal in a
single step, but theyll continue taking steps until they do reach it. The target now is
semiautomatic rifles. Later it will be all semiautomatic pistols. Then it will be other
types of handguns. After that it will be all firearms which hold more than three
cartridges. Thats all a sportsman really needs, theyll say. Then it will be all firearms
except muzzle-loaders. Somewhere along the line, various types of ammunition will be
banned. Only a criminal would want a cartridge like this, theyll say.
Before too many steps have been taken there will be compulsory registration of all
firearms and firearm owners, in order to facilitate confiscation later.
This bleak prospect has a silver lining, and its this: a very substantial portion of gun
owners will defy the government and become outlaws rather than give up their
weapons, if the populations of California and New Jersey are at all representative of the
country as a whole. When bans on so-called assault rifles were enacted in those two
states fewer than 10% of the people owning such weapons turned them in.
Bans of the California and New Jersey sort have a marvelously salutary effect on the
attitude of the people who refuse to comply with the bans. Relatively few of these
people are militant patriots or committed revolutionaries. The great majority are simply
people who have enough character, enough backbone and common sense, to refuse to
let themselves be stampeded along with the sheep into giving up their only effective
means of self-defense in a time of civil disorder. Most of them have been law-abiding
citizens all of their lives, and it is not an easy decision for them to consciously disobey
the law especially a law which could send them to prison for years. They are not
happy about being forced to become outlaws. Once they have crossed that bridge,
however, they should have a much healthier attitude toward the government. Most will
see it thenceforth as their enemy. Many will be ready to fight it when the time comes
for fighting.

They have passed the first test of manhood in the new world of repression and
revolution we are entering now. The more such armed, angry outlaws the government
makes, the better it will be for all of us in the long run.
Ill leave you with this word: Dont do anything violent or foolish. Dont do anything
prematurely. We are in a very serious situation, a situation of extreme danger for the
future of our race, and we must use the utmost prudence in dealing with it. Keep your
firearms out of sight, but within reach. The day will come for using them. The day for a
great cleansing of this land will come. Until that day, keep your powder dry.

()
There is no place to hide anymore JEWS... You are the enemies of humanity and
WE know it... Gun control is Jewish: It is virtually impossible to find anyone who
is an active leader in the gun control movement who is not a racial jew.
(...)
After Newtown, Jews Lead RENEWED Push on Guns
http://forward.com/news/168063...
U.S. Jews Support Gun Control
http://www.haaretz.com/opinion...
http://www.dailystormer.com/wp...
(...)
Most U.S. Federal gun control legislation has been written, introduced, and
sponsored by Jewish Congressmen and Jewish Senators. Apparently its okay for
Jews to possess guns, just not Goyim cattle. Oh yes, the greatest gun grabbers
in US History are and have always been quite Jewish. Gun control in the United
States is as Jewish as our liberal and self-destructive immigration policies.
U.S. Federal Gun Control Legislation, 1968 present
Emanuel Celler (Jew), Democratic Representative from New York(1923 1973)
Howard M. Metzenbaum(Jew), Democratic Senator from Ohio(1974, 1976
1995)
Carl M. Levin(Jew), Democratic Senator from Michigan(1979 present)
Thomas P. Tom Lantos(Jew), Democratic Representative from California(1981
2008)
Arlen Specter(Jew), Democratic Senator from Pennsylvania(1981 present)

Charles E. Chuck Schumer(Jew), Democratic Senator from New York(1999


present), Democratic Represenative from New York(1981-1999)
Frank R. Lautenberg(Jew), Democratic Senator from New Jersey(1982 2001,
2003 present)
Barbara L. Boxer(Jew), Democratic Senator from California(1993 present),
Democratic Representative from California(1983 1993)
Herbert H. Herb Kohl(Jew), Democratic Senator from Wisconsin(1989
present)
Dianne G. Feinstein(Jew), Democratic Senator from California(1992 present)
Jerrold L. Nadler(Jew), Democratic Representative from New York(1992
present)
Steven R. Steve Rothman(Jew),
Jersey(1997 present)

Democratic

Representative

from

New

What are Filthy Jews Saying About Obamas Gun-Grabbery?... Shockingly, Jews
appear to completely hate all forms of basic freedom, and so are celebrating the
evil act of gun-grabbery against America by their Shabbat goy
Rabbi Aryeh Cohen of American Jewish University and Bend the Arc: A Jewish
Partnership for Justice has said:
I thought it was a beginning of a good cultural shift, [although] the reforms he
is bringing are minimal I think it clearly should be a priority for the American
body politic, Cohen said of curbing gun violence. It clearly should be a priority
for the Jewish community in terms of pikuah nefesh, referring to the Jewish
obligation to save a life in jeopardy.
Source: http://www.jewishjournal.com/l...
Gabby Giffords, the former Arizona representative Jew, has argued that the
measures do not go far enough, but has celebrated them nonetheless.
Gabby Giffords and JEWISH GROUPS Back Barack Obama Push on Guns
"Giffords, the first Jewish congresswoman from her home state of Arizona,
received a standing ovation as she entered the East Room ahead of the
Presidents historic announcement that he would sidestep Congress and order
more gun sellers to get licenses and more gun buyers to undergo background
checks "
source: http://forward.com/news/breaki...
Haaretz notes that the National Council of Jewish Women has also praised this
evil act against us, but added that they would continue to push for more
extreme gun-grabbery.

The National Council of Jewish Women, which has been advocating for gun
control SINCE 1969, would continue to work on the state level, said its CEO,
Nancy Kaufman. We still hold out hope the Congress will understand they need
to do something, she said, but added that the most effective route now seemed
to be to advance background checks and gun trafficking on the state level.
Source: http://www.haaretz.com/jewish/...
The ADL also praised this illegal action which destroys the US Constitution.
Jewish groups hail Obamas executive action on gun control
Source: http://www.timesofisrael.com/j...
Jews have been pushing for gun control for decades, and all the major guncontrol advocates are Jewish, including the most vocal, which is former Jew NYC
Mayor Bloomberg. The other top grabbers are Chucky Schumer and Diane
Feinstein Jews both
H***r was right!
H**l H***r!
http://blog.adl.org/extremism/white-supremacist-messages-flood-facebook-afteranti-semitic-posting-by-ted-nugent
()
No one is saying ONLY Jews are for gun control, but their own publications point
out they are LEADING in the call for gun control. Big difference.
https://www.facebook.com/drdaviddukeFANpage/posts/1016956825028564
Jews and Jewish organizations lead the gun control campaign
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2013/01/jews-and-jewish-organizationslead-the-gun-control-campaign/
Jews and Gun Control: A Reprise
http://www.theoccidentalobserver.net/2015/10/jews-and-gun-control-a-reprise/
Dr. Duke and Pastor Dankof Prove Ted Nugent is Right about Jewish Led Gun
Control
http://davidduke.com/dr-duke-pastor-dankof-prove-ted-nugent-right-jewish-ledgun-control-superslut-gaga-ziobowl/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=27hfB26T4mM&feature=youtu.be
(Dr. Duke and Pastor Dankopf Prove Ted Nugent is Right about Jewish Led Gun
Control & more on Superslut Gaga at the ZioBowl, Show 2/09/16)

"Ted Nugent was called anti-Semitic for saying that Jews lead the effort to take
away our guns! If he is anti-Semitic so are all the Jewish organizations that boast
of the fact that they lead the effort, including the ADL which called him an antiSemite. If Jews have a problem with the truth then the truth is... Anti-Semitic!"
"The ADL wrote that you [Ted Nugent] pointing out the truth that the Jewish
establishment has led the fight for Gun Control is "anti-Semitic" -- Here is a
picture of the ADL Post boasting to their supporters their work for gun control all
the way since 1967! And also I will post a picture of the leading Jewish
newspaper in America The Jewish Forward also boasting that Jews lead the fight
for gun control. So they these Jewish organizations must also be anti-Semitic.
Or, truth must be anti-Semitic! If I can't put the pictures in here you see them at
my Dr. David Duke Fan page! Good Luck! Former Member House of
Representatives-LA, Dr. David Duke. You are my hero!"
"An anti-Semite used to mean a man who hated Jews. Now it means a man who
is hated by Jews."

- Joseph Sobran, "For Fear of the Jews," an address to the 14th IHR Conference,
June 22nd, 2002, Irvine, California. Published in the August 2002 issue of
Sobran's newsletter, and in the May-August 2002 issue of the IHR's (Institute for
Historical Review) Journal of Historical Review. For Fear of the Jews was
"Expanded from SOBRANS, September 2002, pages 36, and taken from a
speech given at the IHR Conference held in Los Angeles, June 2123, 2002."
http://www.sobran.com/fearofjews.shtml
http://www.ihr.org/conference/14thconf/sobranconf.html
"The truth is hate to those who hate the truth." -- Germar Rudolf,
Introduction (Chicago, July 7, 2005), Auschwitz Lies: Legends, Lies &
Prejudices on the Holocaust (Mattogno, Carlo; Rudolf, Germar), pp. 13.
Revised 2nd edition, The Barnes Review, July 2011.
"We warned you that the Jews are a fifth column in white nations, supporting
nationalism for Israel, diversity for the West, and directing our militaries to wage
endless war on their behalf." -- Matt Forney
http://mattforney.com/warned-didnt-listen/
http://www.returnofkings.com/62716/the-damaging-effects-of-jewishintellectualism-and-activism-on-western-culture
()
Who is Behind Gun Control in US congress and senate?1) Emanuel Celler
(Ashkenazi Jew)
2) Howard M. Metzenbaum (Jew)

3) Carl M. Levin (Jew)


4) Thomas P. Tom Lantos (Jew)
5) Arlen Specter (Jew)
6) Charles E. Chuck Schumer (Jew)
7) Frank R. Lautenberg (Jew)
8) Barbara L. Boxer (Jew)
9) Herbert H. Herb Kohl (Jew)
10)Dianne G. Feinstein (Jew)
11)Jerrold L. Nadler (Jew)
12)Steven R. Steve Rothman (Ashkenazi Jew)Know your enemy ? with JEWS we
lose.
===============================================
Fuente:
http://nationalvanguard.org/2015/10/gun-control-not-what-it-seems/
https://natall.com/

You might also like