Professional Documents
Culture Documents
State: MA
Ext.
4132813318
xtrarich@gmail.com
Individual
Organization
Media
County
Regional/District
State
Page 1
Williamstown Elementary(WES), Lanesborough Elementary (LES) and Mt Greylock Reg. H.S. (MG)--share a superintendent as the
Tri-District. The three districts are each governed by their own elected school committee (SC). The SCs established 2 committees to
facilitate their cooperative arrangement: (1) Superintendency Union 71 (SU71) consists of 3 members from each of the elementary SCs,
and (2) the Administrative Review Subcommittee (ARS), composed of the WES SC chair, Dan Caplinger, and the LES chair, Regina
Dilego, and two members of the MG SC, including its chair, Carrie Greene. All 4 members of ARS must be present for a quorum, and 3
are a voting majority.
In violation of OML, a Chairs Committee (CC) -- Mr. Caplinger, Ms. Dilego, and Ms. Greene -- have been regularly deliberating
and taking collective action in private, without posting agendas or recording minutes. At least some of the time, Superintendent Dr. Dias
also participates.
For example, on 3/4/16, at 9:13am. Dr. Dias emailed the CC asking for approval to pursue the possibility of his serving as the
part-time superintendent for three other towns. The CC voted by reply all emails during the next 90 minutes. Dilego at 9:36: "I'm glad
this is moving forward." Caplinger at 9:37: Im fine.... Ms. Greene at 10:49: Agreed with all of the above. They collectively edited
the letter and Dr. Dias submitted it on 3/7 on Tri-District letterhead. The MG SC as a whole had no knowledge of this matter until an
executive session on 3/15 (called for a completely unrelated matter) was misused to discuss it. The MG SC was told that the matter was
being revealed because news of the letter would be appearing that day in the Berkshire Eagle.
Although MG SC members expressed outrage during the executive session that the Chairs and Superintendent acted without their
knowledge, the CC continued to take collective actions in secret. For example, Ms. Greene wrote to the other CC members and Dr. Dias
at 9:06am on 5/13, about the process of evaluating the superintendent: Lets discuss at todays meeting. Later that day, as part of the
same email thread, statements were issued by Ms. Green at 4:02pm and by Ms. Dilego at 10:51pm, acting on the agreed outcome of the
CC meeting. Note that ARS has jurisdiction over the process of evaluating superintendent, but the fourth member of ARS was not made
aware that the CC was meeting.
The CC also took concerted action by secretly engaging the districts legal counsel against MG members that expressed dissenting
opinions such as complaints about the decision-making process on whether the Superintendent expand his responsibilities by taking
on administration of additional school districts. (Greene email to CC at 4:20pm 5/13) MG SC policy BDG prohibits access to the
districts legal counsel by individual SC members (including the chair) unless the purpose receives prior approval from the whole
committee.
What action do you want the public body to take in response to your complaint?
Note: This text field has a maximum of 500 characters.
I hope and expect this complaint can be resolved locally to give the public confidence that district
governance will be conducted in a democratic manner that doesnt exclude the eyes of the public and
the voices of dissent. If we need the three chairs to take collective action, lets agree to a process
consistent with Open Mtg Law that ensures the district administration does not have an alternative to
fully engaging school committees and the public on educational policy and budget priorities.
Signed: ___________________________________________
Page 2