Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Faculty of Industrial Sciences and Technology, Universiti Malaysia Pahang, Gambang, Pahang, Malaysia. 2Graduate School of Science and
_
Technology, Gunma University, Kiryu, Gunma, Japan. 3Department of Environmental and Symbiotic Science, College of Agriculture, Food
and Environment Sciences, Rakuno Gakuen University, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan.
ABSTR ACT: Water qualities of three suburban rivers, namely, Kuantan, Belat, and Galing rivers, in Kuantan, Malaysia, were examined effectively
by using ion-exclusion/cation-exchange chromatography with water quality indices and land usage data. Specifically, we have focused on evaluating and
grasping the effect of sewage/household wastewater discharged from housing areas in the Kuantan district on the river water quality. Based on this study,
the following beneficial information were obtained effectively: (1) the pollution levels in the three rivers (Kuantan River: Classes IIII, Belat River:
ClassesIIII, and Galing River: Classes IV) are linked with the urbanization level of the river basin area; (2) differences in the biological reactions in the
different pollution level rivers are understood; (3) Galing River is among the most polluted rivers not only in Kuantan but also in the Peninsular Malaysia,
owing to poor water treatment of the sewage/household wastewater discharged from the river basin area.
KEY WORDS: ion-exclusion/cation-exchange chromatography, water quality index, land usage, urban rivers water pollution, effective water quality
assessment, Malaysia
CITATION: Kozaki et al. Assessment of the river Water Pollution levels in Kuantan,
Malaysia, Using ion-exclusion chromatographic data, Water Quality indices,
and land Usage Patterns. Air, Soil and Water Research 2016:9 111
doi:10.4137/ASWr.S33017.
TYPE: Original Research
RECEIVED: August 18, 2015. RESUBMITTED: November 8, 2015. ACCEPTED FOR
PUBLICATION: November 11, 2015.
ACADEMIC EDITOR: Carlos Alberto Martinez-Huitle, Editor in Chief
PEER REVIEW: Four peer reviewers contributed to the peer review report. Reviewers
reports totaled 746 words, excluding any confidential comments to the academic editor.
FUNDING: This study was supported by the internal fund of the Universiti Malaysia
Pahang (RDU 1303126). The authors confirm that the funder had no influence over the
study design, content of the article, or selection of this journal.
Introduction
Kozaki et al
Table 1. Classification of ammoniacal nitrogen, COD, DO, and pH in the WQI of the Department of Energy in Malaysia.
CLASS
USES
PARAMETER
NH4 + -N (mg/L)
COD (mg/L)
DO (mg/L)
pH
,0.1
,10
.7
6.58.5
II
0.10.3
1025
57
6.59.0
III
0.30.9
2550
35
5.09.0
IV
Irrigation
0.92.7
50100
13
5.09.0
.2.7
.100
,1
Kozaki et al
Reagents. All the reagents were obtained from SigmaAldrich Co. (Greater St. Louis, MO, USA). Pure water
(18 M cm at 25C) obtained from an ELGA-DV25 system was used for dissolving and diluting the reagents. The
standard solutions used in the IEC/CEC system were diluted
from the stock solutions to the appropriate concentrations
with pure water.
River water sampling. In this study, to precisely assess
the water quality degradation by the sewage/household
wastewater from urbanized areas, we collected the water
samples in June, which was the month with the lowest mean
precipitation (132.8mm) from 2008 to 2013 in Kuantan.18 The
Kuantan, Belat, and Galing river water samples were collected
from nine (on June 1, 2014), seven (on June 8, 2014), and eight
(on June 14, 2014) different sites in the daytime, respectively.
All the river water samples were collected at the center of the
river in the surface water layer (015cm from the surface). The
water samples for the IEC/CEC system were filtered through
a membrane filter ( 0.45 urn; Acrodisc25 mm syringe
filters; Pall Corp.) immediately following collection and then
Figure 4. Ion-exclusion/cation-exchange chromatogram of inorganic anions and cations. Injected sample: (A) a mixture of MgSO 4, KCl, NaNO3, NH4Cl,
and KNO3 (1.0mM each) and (B) river water sampled at point K-6 in the Kuantan River (Fig. 2).
Notes: Separation column: Two TSKgel Super IC-A/C columns (150mm6.0mm ID) packed with WCX in the H + -form; eluent: 6mM tartaric acid and
2mM 18-crown-6 ether; column temperature: 40C; flow rate: 0.5mL/minute; injection volume: 30L; and detector: conductivity. Peak: 1=SO 42-, 2=Cl-,
3=NO3 -, 4=elution dip, 5=Na +, 6=NH4+, 7=K+, 8=Mg2+, and 9=Ca2+.
Kuantan River basin has the lowest human activity and the
lowest average values of COD (11.5mg/L), TP (1.01mg/L),
and total inorganic nitrogen (TIN; NO3 - -N plus NH4 + -N)
(0.177mg/L), but the highest DO value (5.39mg/L) among
the three rivers as shown in Figure 5.
In contrast, the total average percentages of housing
and business/servicing areas of the Galing River basin are
30.5% and 5.38%, respectively; these values are the highest
among the three river basins, while its forest area comprises
16.3% of the total basin area. These data show that the Galing
River basin area is the most urbanized river basin and has the
highest human activity. Therefore, the average values of COD
Figure 5. Comparison of (A) COD (n=4); (B) TP (n=3); (C) TIN (NO3 - -N plus NH4+ -N) (n = 3); (D) DO (n=3); and (E) pH (n=3) for the Kuantan, Belat,
and Galing rivers.
Kozaki et al
Figure 6. Comparison of the inorganic ion concentrations (A) SO 42-; (B) Cl-; (C) NO3 -; (D) Na +; (E) NH4+; (F) K+; (G) Mg2+; and (H) Ca2+ for the Kuantan,
Belat, and Galing rivers.
Kozaki et al
Conclusions
Figure 8. NO3 - -N, NH4+ -N, and DO contents in the (A) Kuantan River; (B) Belat River; (C) Galing River.
Figure 9. Relationship between TIN and COD in the Kuantan, Belat, and
Galing rivers.
10
37
37
Sungai Petani (443,488)
7.307.56/Class I
3.424.39/Class III
4.238.06/Class IIII
1.032.53/Class IV
1.031.79/Class IV
Merbok River
Petani River
21.823.4/Class II
1.473.72/Class IVV
Melana River
27.135.0/Class III
35
36
Johor Bahru (497,067)
2.334.07/Class IIIIV
2.377.64/Class IIV
0.195.48/Class IIV
Skudai River
24.040.6/Class IIIII
0.006.94/Class IV
19.571.9/Class IIIV
33
34
Petaling Jaya (613,977)
Kajang (795,522)
6.397.09/Class III
6.577.44/Class I
0.1607.58/Class IV
0.122.13/Class IIIV
Penchala River
14.3219/Class IIV
2.547.54/Class IIV
32
Kuala Lumpur (1,588,750)
Langat River
1.37165/Class IV
31
Kuala Lumpur (1,588,750)
7.24/Class I
5.717.89/Class III
0.40010.9/Class IV
3.19/Class III
1.0114.7/Class IVV
Gombak River
4.00105/Class IV
4.59/Class V
Klang River
44.0/Class III
This study
Kuantan (427,515)
5.586.03/Class III
6.486.84/Class III
2.104.02/Class IIIIV
3.956.24/Class IIIII
1.306.65/Class IVV
Galing River
7.5054.0/Class IIV
0.000.0544/Class I
Belat River
13.531.8/Class III
5.296.75/Class III
4.595.98/Class IIIII
DO (mg/L)
COD (mg/L)
5.7517.5/Class III
0.000.0373/Class I
NH4 -N (mg/L)
Acknowledgments
Kuantan River
PARAMETER/CLASS
NAME OF THE
RIVER
Table 2. Water quality of Kuantan, Belat, Galing, and several major urban rivers in Malaysia.
pH
CITY (POPULATION)
REFERENCE
Kozaki et al
Author Contributions
REFERENCES
29. Canter LW, Knox RC. Septic Tank System Effects on Ground Water Quality.
CRC Press, Boca Raton; 1985.
30. Nutrients in Streams. United States Geological Survey 2013. United States
Geological Survey (USGS). Available at http://pubs.usgs.gov/circ/circ1171/
html/nutrients.htm. Accessed December 20, 2014.
31. Mamun AA, Hafizah SN, Alam MZ. Improvement of existing water quality
index in selangor, Malaysia. In 2nd International Conference on Water & Flood
Management. March 1517, 2009.
32. Ismail Z, Sulaiman R, Karim R. Evaluating trends of water quality index of
selected Kelang River tributaries. Environ Eng Manag J. 2014;13:6172.
33. Juahir H, Zain SM, Yusoff MK, et al. Spatial water quality assessment of Langat
river basin (Malaysia) using environmetric techniques. Environ Monit Assess.
2011;173:625641.
34. Mahazar A, Othman MS, Kutty AA, et al. Monitoring urban river water quality using macroinvertebrate and physico-chemical parameters case study of
Penchala River, Malaysia. J Biosoc Sci. 2013;13:474482.
35. Ali ZM, Shahabuddin FA, Shen SY, Mamat NJZ. Water Quality Study at
Skudai River, 20022006. In 2009 World Congress on Nature & Biologically
Inspired Computing, Coimbatore, December 911, 2009.
36. Arman NZ, Said MIM, Salmiati AS, et al. Comparison between water quality
index (WQI) and biological water quality index (BWQI) for water quality assessment: case study of Melana River, Johor. Malays J Anal Sci. 2013;17:224229.
37. Kamrudzaman AN, Nordin AMA, Aziz RA, et al. Mapping status for river
water quality index of Sungai Merbok, Kedah, Malaysia. Int J Chem Environ Eng.
2012;3:6468.
11