A bill of attainder - is a legislative act which inflicts punishment / penalty without judicial trial. An ex post facto law is one which: 1. Aggravates a crime or makes it greater than it was, when committed.
A bill of attainder - is a legislative act which inflicts punishment / penalty without judicial trial. An ex post facto law is one which: 1. Aggravates a crime or makes it greater than it was, when committed.
A bill of attainder - is a legislative act which inflicts punishment / penalty without judicial trial. An ex post facto law is one which: 1. Aggravates a crime or makes it greater than it was, when committed.
which defines crimes, threat of their nature, and provides for corresponding punishment. Crime is an act committed or omitted in violation of public law forbidding or commanding it. Sources of the Philippine Law 1. The Revised Penal Code (R.A 3815) and its amendments. 2. Special Penal laws passed by Philippine Commission, Philippine Assembly, Philippine Legislature, National Assembly, The Congress of the Philippines and Batasang Pambansa. 3. The Presidential Decree issued during the Martial Law. Common Law vs Statutory Law Common Law a law that has been developed on the basis of preceding rulings by a judges. Statutory Law a written law passed by legislature and government of a country and those which have been accepted by the society. Limitations on the power of the lawmaking body to enact penal legislation. 1. No ex post facto law or bill of attainder shall be enacted. 2. No person shall be held to answer for a criminal offense without due process of law. 3. No to infliction of cruel punishments. An ex post facto law is one which: 1. Makes criminal act done before passage of the law and which was innocent was done and punishes such an act. 2. Aggravates a crime or makes it greater than it was, when committed. 3. Changes the punishment and inflicting a greater punishment than the law annexed to the crime when committed. 4. Alters the legal rules of evidence, and authorizes conviction upon less or different testimony than the law required at the time of the commission of the offense. 5. Assumes to regulate civil rights and remedies only. 6. Deprives a person accused of a crime some lawful protection to which he has become entitled. A bill of attainder is a legislative act which inflicts punishment/penalty without judicial trial.
Construction of Penal Laws
Favoured to the accused Strictly against the state Doctrine of the Equipoise when the evidence of the prosecution and of the defense is equally balanced, the scale should be title in favour of the accused in obedience to the constitutional presumption of innocence. void for vagueness doctrine that a law cannot be enforced if it is vague or confusing that the average person could not figure out what is being prohibited or what the penalties are for breaking the law. Doctrine of Pro Reo when a circumstance is susceptible to two interpretations, one favourable to the accused and the other against him, that interpretation favourable to him shall prevail. Constitutional Rights of an Accused Rights to a speedy disposition of their cases before all judicial, quasijudicial, or administrative bodies. Rights to due process of law Rights to bail Right to be heard by himself and have counsel Rights to remain silent and rights to self incrimination Excessive fines shall not be imposed nor cruel degrading or inhuman punishment inflicted. No person shall be twice put a jeopardy of punishment for the same offense. Free access to the courts and quasijudicial bodies and adequate legal assistance shall not be denied to any person by reason of poverty Characteristics of criminal law 1. Generality means that all the criminal law of the country governs all persons of the country regardless of their beliefs, race, gender, or creed. R.A. No. 75 AN ACT TO PENALIZE ACTS WHICH WOULD IMPAIR THE PROPER OBSERVANCE BY THE REPUBLIC AND INHABITANTS OF THE PHILIPINES OF THE IMMUNITIES, RIGHT, AND PRIVILEGES OF DULY ACCREDITED FOREIGN DIPLOMATIC AND CONSULAR AGENTS OF THE PHILIPPINES.
It is well settled that a consul is not
entitled to the privileges and immunities of an ambassador or minister, but is subject to the laws and regulations of the country to which he is accredited. 2. Territoriality penal laws of the country have force and effect within its territory. 3. Prospectivity penal laws only operate prospectively (moving forward); also called irretrospectively. Exception to the application of Prospective Criminal Law: When theres a new law that is favourable to the accused, there will be a retroactive effect. But there are two exceptions (1) if the new law is not applicable to the pending actions (2) when the accused is a habitual offender under article 62 section 5 of the RPC. Different effects off the repeal on penal law: 1. New Law < Old Law New law shall be applied; except for those habitual delinquent. 2. New Law > Old Law the law applied is at the time of commission of an offense. 3. If new Law totally repeals the existing law the crime will obliterated. Note:
When the repeal law is
absolute; the offenses ceases to criminal. When the new law and old law penalize the same offense; the offender can be tried under the law; however if the new law is favourable should prevail. When the repeal law fails to punish the offense under the old law; the accused cannot be convicted under the new law.
THE REVISED PENAL CODE
(ARTICLE 3815, AS AMENDED), AN ACT TO REVISE THE PENAL CODE AND OTHER SPECIAL LAWS. BOOK ONE: GENERAL PROVISIONS REGARDING THE DATE OF ENFORCEMENT AND THE APPLICATION OF THE PROVISIONS OF THIS
CODE AND THE PERSONS LIABLE, AND THE
PENALTIES. HISTORY OF THE REVISED PENAL CODE The Code Commission was created via Administrative Order No. 94 by Department of Justice date October 18, 1927. Anacleto Diaz appointed as chairman of the commission. Quintin Paredes, Guillermo Guevarra, Alex Reyes and Mariano H. De Joya as a members. The Code Commission ask to revise the old penal code taking into consideration of the existing conditions, special laws and rulings laid down by the supreme court. The Committed did not undertake the codifications of all Penal Laws in the Philippines. What they did is to merely revise the old Penal Code and drafted the Penal Laws related to it. The Old Penal Code took effect on July 18, 1887 and ended up on December 31, 1931. The Revised Penal Code approved on December 8, 1930 and took effect on January 1, 1932. For those who committed felony prior the revising of the penal code, were punished accordance at the time of the offenses were made under Article 366 of the RPC. Article 1: Time when Act takes effect. This Code shall take effect on the first day of January, nineteen hundred and thirty two. There are two theories of Criminal Law namely; (1) Classical Theory and (2) Positivist Theory 1. Classical Theory (1) The basis of criminal liability is human freewill and the purpose of the penalty is retribution. (2) That man is essentially a moral creature with an absolutely free will to choose between good and evil thereby placing more stress upon the effect or result of the felonious act than upon the man, the criminal itself. (3) It has endeavoured to establish a mechanical and direct proportion between crime and penalty. 2. Positivist Theory This theory views a criminal merely as a sick man who needs reformation and cure instead to be punishment.
Article 2: Applications of its provisions Except
a provided in the treaties and laws of preferential application, the provisions of this code shall be enforced not only within the Philippine Archipelago, including of its atmosphere, interior waters and maritime zone, but also outside of its jurisdiction against those who: 1. Should commit an offense while on Philippine airship or ship. 2. Should forge or counterfeit any coin or currency notes of the Philippines Island or Obligations and Securities issued by the Government of the Philippines Island. 3. Should be liable for acts connected with the introduction into these islands of the obligations and securities mentioned in the preceding number; 4. While being public officers or employees, should commit an offense in the exercise of their functions or 5. Should commit any of the crimes against national security and law of nations, defined in Title One of Book Two of this Code. When the offender should commit an offense while on Philippine airship or ship. General Rule: The Philippine vessel, although beyond three miles from the seashore are considered as part of national territory. Thus any person who committed a crime inside the Philippine airship or ship same while it is outside the Philippine territory can be tried before the civil court under the violation of revised Penal Code. However, the Philippine vessel should registered in the Bureau of Customs as compliance with the Philippine law. The Philippine court has no jurisdiction over the crime of theft committed on the high seas on board a vessel if it is not registered or licensed in the Philippines. When the offender should forge or counterfeit any coin or currency notes of the Philippine Islands or obligations and securities issued by the Government of the Philippine Islands. General Rule: Any person who makes or imports or counterfeits the coins and currency of the country or forges the Treasury Notes or other securities issued by the Government can be tried under the violation of Article 163 and 166 of the Revised Penal Code.
When the offender, while being a public
officers and employees, should commit an offense in the exercise of their functions. General Rule: Any government employees who committed crime while in these of their functions are directly bribery and can be tried under the anti-graft and corruption act. When the offender, should commit any crimes against national security and the laws of nation, defined in the Title of the Book 2 of this code. General Rule: Any person committed crimes against national security and the law of nations are treason. Crimes that are punishable in the Philippines under Article two are cognizable by the Regional Trial Court in which the charge is filed. Exceptions of this Article 2: Treaties Laws of Preferential Application o RP-US Visiting Forces Agreement o Military Bases Agreement o Diplomatic Immunity Public International Law Crimes committed on board of a foreign merchant ship or airship General Rule: Any persons of the Philippines who committed crimes on a foreign merchant ship or airship cannot be tried in the Philippine Court instead to Foreign Court. Exceptions: When the foreign vessel failed to provide suitable means for securing animals while transporting them on a foreign port to the Philippine port is under jurisdiction of the Philippine Court when forbidden conditions existed during the time the ship was within territorial waters. Rules as to jurisdiction over crimes committed aboard foreign merchant vessels. French Rule: Such crimes are not triable in the courts of that country, unless their commission affects the peace and security of the territory or the safety of the state is endangered. English Rule: Such crimes are triable in the courts in that country, unless they merely affect things within the vessel or they refer to the internal management thereof. The Philippines follow this rule.
Do the Philippines Court have jurisdiction
over crime of homicide committed on board a foreign merchant vessel by a member of the crew against another? General Rule: All felonious homicide undergo trial into the local court. Crimes not involving a breach of public order committed on board a foreign merchant vessel in transit not triable by our courts. General Rule: Mere possession of opium in a foreign merchant vessel in transit is not triable in the Philippines. However, possession of opium in a foreign merchant vessel not in transit (terminal port) in the Philippines is an open violation of Philippine laws. Also, smoking of opium aboard English vessel while anchored 2 miles in Manila bay constitutes a breach of public order.
Philippine courts have no jurisdiction over
offenses committed on foreign warships in territorial waters. Distinction must be made between merchant ships and warships. Article 3: Definition Acts and omissions punishable by law are felonies (delitos). Felonies are committed not only by means of deceit (dolo) also by means of fault (culpa). There is a deceit when the act is performed with deliberate intent; and there is fault when the wrongful act results imprudence, negligence, lack of foresight, or lack of skills Felony acts and omissions punishable by the Revised Penal Code. Felony Violation of Revised Penal Code Violations Violation of Special Laws Crime Violation of ordinary/public law Elements of felonies: 1. There must be an act or omission 2. That the act or omission must be punishable by the Revised Penal Code. 3. That the act is performed or the omission incurred by means of dolo or culpa. Act any bodily movement tending to produce some effect in the external world. It being unnecessary that the same be actually produced, as the possibility of its production to sufficient.
Omission - is meant inaction, the failure to
perform a positive duty which one is bound to do. There must be a law requiring the doing or performance of an act. Nullum crimen, nullum poene sine lege no crime when there is no law punishing it.
11-02-13 Maid of The Mist Corporation Et Al V William Windsor (1:06-cv-00714) - Likely To Be Part of Racketeering in The US District Court, Northern District of Georgia
November 2008 Room Assignment of Baguio City Applicants for the National Licensure Examination for Registered Nurses NLE-RN Board of Nursing BON Professional Regulation Commission PRC Republic of the Philippines