Professional Documents
Culture Documents
GiveupBeefandsavethePlanet|Vaidyanathan
VAIDYANAT
HAN
ABOUT
There is a big debate about global warming and carbon foot prints in the
C ATEG O R IES
SelectCategory
Group of Twenty (also known as the G-20 or G20) and other forums and
India listens to western lectures on dangers of coal and emissions etc.
So far the discussion is only on fossil fuels and items like concrete
constructions but not on eating habits of people. The latter contributes
much more to global warming and Ecological destruction. We often do
A RCH IV ES
SelectMonth
R E CENT P O ST S
not bring that to the top of the table since all discussion is essentially
West determined.
Mostofusareawarethatourcars,ourcoal
generatedelectricpowerandevenourcement
factoriesadverselyaffecttheenvironment.Until
recently,however,thefoodsweeathadgottenapass
inthediscussion.Yetaccordingtoa2006reportby
theUnitedNationsFoodandAgriculture
Organization(FAO),ourdietsand,specifically,the
meatinthemcausemoregreenhousegasescarbon
dioxide(CO2),methane,nitrousoxide,andtheliketo
spewintotheatmospherethaneithertransportation
orindustry.(Greenhousegasestrapsolarenergy,
therebywarmingtheearthssurface.Becausegases
varyingreenhousepotency,everygreenhousegasis
usuallyexpressedasanamountofCO2withthesame
globalwarmingpotential.)
http://rvaidya2000.com/2016/01/30/giveupbeefandsavetheplanet/
2/3/2016
GiveupBeefandsavethePlanet|Vaidyanathan
Curbing the worlds huge and increasing appetite for meat is essential to
@Swamy39
51minutesago
RT @Swamy39:
@RAJ_KUMAR_VERMA
@kksubbu2003 : And what
about JJ putting the Kanchi
Shankaracharya in jail on a
More importantly it is to be noted that the study shows red meat or beef
dwarfs others for environmental impact, using 28 times more land and
11 times water for pork or chicken.
@ssavitri115 @C
56minutesago
pork or chicken, 11 times more water and results in five times more
RT @Swamy39:
@Chennai_Knight : I am ok
wheat, and rice, the impact of beef per calorie is even more extreme,
requiring 160 times more land and producing 11 times more greenhouse
gases.
would be not to use grains for beef production in the US. However, he
said the subject was always controversial: This opens a real can of
worms.
Vijaykanth in a new
56minutesago
Prof Mark Sutton, at the UKs Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, said:
Follow@rvaidya2000
M ET A
Register
Log in
2/4
2/3/2016
GiveupBeefandsavethePlanet|Vaidyanathan
environment.
Log in
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
Blog at WordPress.com.
Follow
Follow
Vaidyanathan
forest and grasslands, which are turned over for grazing. Soil
erosion, soil and water pollution from fertilisers and animal waste
Sign me up
Build a website with WordPress.com
its head by asking the West to close down steak houses and consume less
red-meat/ beef rather than meekly accepting their arm twisting.
Share this:
46
Like
3bloggerslikethis.
Related
Scam-tainted
money may be
moving the markets
In "Black money &
http://rvaidya2000.com/2016/01/30/giveupbeefandsavetheplanet/
Unorganised
sector, Hindu rate
and terminological
terror
3/4
2/3/2016
GiveupBeefandsavethePlanet|Vaidyanathan
In "First Post"
terror
In "First Post"
Leave a Reply
Enteryourcommenthere...
Blog at WordPress.com.
The Origin Theme.
http://rvaidya2000.com/2016/01/30/giveupbeefandsavetheplanet/
4/4