The document discusses Ferdinand Marcos' controversial presidency of the Philippines. It notes that Marcos initiated infrastructure programs and development projects but ruled autocratically. His wife Imelda was accused of ordering the assassination of Ninoy Aquino, though she denies it. This contributed to Marcos declaring martial law, which closed media and reduced freedoms. While development occurred under Marcos, he lost balance by not respecting people's privileges and rights, leading to protests and Cory Aquino coming to power. The document analyzes Marcos' rule as having positive economic impacts but negative effects on individual freedoms.
The document discusses Ferdinand Marcos' controversial presidency of the Philippines. It notes that Marcos initiated infrastructure programs and development projects but ruled autocratically. His wife Imelda was accused of ordering the assassination of Ninoy Aquino, though she denies it. This contributed to Marcos declaring martial law, which closed media and reduced freedoms. While development occurred under Marcos, he lost balance by not respecting people's privileges and rights, leading to protests and Cory Aquino coming to power. The document analyzes Marcos' rule as having positive economic impacts but negative effects on individual freedoms.
The document discusses Ferdinand Marcos' controversial presidency of the Philippines. It notes that Marcos initiated infrastructure programs and development projects but ruled autocratically. His wife Imelda was accused of ordering the assassination of Ninoy Aquino, though she denies it. This contributed to Marcos declaring martial law, which closed media and reduced freedoms. While development occurred under Marcos, he lost balance by not respecting people's privileges and rights, leading to protests and Cory Aquino coming to power. The document analyzes Marcos' rule as having positive economic impacts but negative effects on individual freedoms.
Lately, our professor provided us to watch a movie about the president
who ruled our country, Philippines. Its so meaningful and full of
information that the student like us will gain knowledge about the history of the Philippines. Presidents are the one who has the responsibility to take care of the country what he/she ruling. But some of them have their own characteristics and behaviours in which one of them will also have their own ways and techniques on how they will rule the country. Ferdinand Marcos, Cory Aquino, Fidel Ramos and Joseph Estrada are the example for this. The term of Ferdinand Marcos was the most controversial regime in the Philippines history. Marcos was an intellectual, capable of initiating unimaginable ideals for himself and for his country. He served in the military and assembled medals of prestige and honour. According to the movie weve watched, Marcos was then imprisoned but lately released. He studied while he was in prison and even topped the bar exams. In accordance, he defends himself to the court and he was successfully released in prison. Because of his intelligence and all of his political achievements, government appoint him to become the president and people dont complain but instead to trust and agree about what happened. Before he declares martial law, he gave a lot of contributions. Some are infrastructure programs, electricity generator, and development of roads, buildings, bridges and others. With Marcos autocratic style of ruling Philippines, he was able to do these developments without hesitation and also with the help of his wife, Imelda Marcos, the widow and first lady of him. He can do all what he wanted to do. His wife, Imelda, was accused that she ordered to shoot Ninoy Aquino while he is landing on the Philippines. But base on the film in personal interview of her, she said that its not true that she do that. This theory of her is not yet proven until now. And this is the huge factor why Marcos declares Martial Law. People tend to protest and march along EDSA because of his undeniable works like heavy demonstrations and spend a large amount of money. He extended his term, closed the mass media and even the freedom of people was lost. Then Cory Aquino Ina ng Bayan takes off. For us students, based on this, even we doesnt encounter this, there is positive and negative effect on how Marcos ruled the Philippines. Positive is the huge development of the properties and the negative is the disappearance of the freedom of every individual. Its great that he gave us a good contributions but it should be balance between the power of him and the people around him. He must listen on what people wanted and unwanted based on what they just can do and not. Hes trying to steal everyones privilege to do something they like to do. Martial Law is not in favour for everyone; it should be disclosed and pops off.