Introduction to Activity Based

Costing
Activity based costing (ABC) assigns manufacturing overhead costs to products in a more logical
manner than the traditional approach of simply allocating costs on the basis of machine hours.
Activity based costing first assigns costs to the activities that are the real cause of the overhead.
It then assigns the cost of those activities only to the products that are actually demanding the
activities.
Let's discuss activity based costing by looking at two products manufactured by the same
company. Product 124 is a low volume item which requires certain activities such as special
engineering, additional testing, and many machine setups because it is ordered in small
quantities. A similar product, Product 366, is a high volume productrunning continuouslyand
requires little attention and no special activities. If this company used traditional costing, it might
allocate or "spread" all of its overhead to products based on the number of machine hours. This
will result in little overhead cost allocated to Product 124, because it did not have many machine
hours. However, it did demand lots of engineering, testing, and setup activities. In contrast,
Product 366 will be allocated an enormous amount of overhead (due to all those machine hours),
but it demanded little overhead activity. The result will be a miscalculation of each product's true
cost of manufacturing overhead. Activity based costing will overcome this shortcoming by
assigning overhead on more than the one activity, running the machine.
Activity based costing recognizes that the special engineering, special testing, machine setups,
and others are activities that cause coststhey cause the company to consume resources.
Under ABC, the company will calculate the cost of the resources used in each of these activities.
Next, the cost of each of these activities will be assigned only to the products that demanded the
activities. In our example, Product 124 will be assigned some of the company's costs of special
engineering, special testing, and machine setup. Other products that use any of these activities
will also be assigned some of their costs. Product 366 will not be assigned any cost of special
engineering or special testing, and it will be assigned only a small amount of machine setup.
Activity based costing has grown in importance in recent decades because (1) manufacturing
overhead costs have increased significantly, (2) the manufacturing overhead costs no longer
correlate with the productive machine hours or direct labor hours, (3) the diversity of products
and the diversity in customers' demands have grown, and (4) some products are produced in
large batches, while others are produced in small batches.
New! We just released our 29-page Managerial & Cost Accounting Insights. This PDF document
is designed to deepen your understanding of topics such as product costing, overhead cost
allocations, estimating cost behavior, costs for decision making, and more. It is only available
when you join AccountingCoach PRO.

Activity Based Costing with Two

Activities

Let's illustrate the concept of activity based costing by looking at two common manufacturing
activities: (1) the setting up of a production machine for running batches of products, and (2) the
actual production of the units of product.
We will assume that a company has annual manufacturing overhead costs of $2,000,000of
which $200,000 is directly involved in setting up the production machines. During the year the
company expects to perform 400 machine setups. Let's also assume that the batch sizes vary
considerably, but the setup efforts for each machine are similar.
The cost per setup is calculated to be $500 ($200,000 of cost per year divided by 400 setups per
year). Under activity based costing, $200,000 of the overhead will be viewed as a batch-level
cost. This means that $200,000 will first be allocated to batches of products to be manufactured
(referred to as a Stage 1 allocation), and then be assigned to the units of product in each batch
(referred to as Stage 2 allocation). For example, if Batch X consists of 5,000 units of product,
the setup cost per unit is $0.10 ($500 divided by 5,000 units). If Batch Y is 50,000 units, the cost
per unit for setup will be $0.01 ($500 divided by 50,000 units). For simplicity, let's assume that the
remaining $1,800,000 of manufacturing overhead is caused by the production activities that
correlate with the company's 100,000 machine hours.
For our simple two-activity example, let's see how the rates for allocating the manufacturing
overhead would look with activity based costing and without activity based costing:

Next, let's see what impact these different allocation techniques and overhead rates would have
on the per unit cost of a specific unit of output. Assume that a company manufactures a batch of
5,000 units and it produces 50 units per machine hour, here is how the cost assigned to the units
with activity based costing and without activity based costing compares:

If a company manufactures a batch of 50,000 units and produces 50 units per machine hour,
here is how the cost assigned to the units with ABC and without ABC compares:

As the tables above illustrate, with activity based costing the cost per unit decreases from $0.46
to $0.37 because the cost of the setup activity is spread over 50,000 units instead of 5,000 units.
Without ABC, the cost per unit is $0.40 regardless of the number of units in each batch. If
companies base their selling prices on costs, a company not using an ABC approach might lose
the large batch work to a competitor who bids a lower price based on the lower, more accurate
overhead cost of $0.37. It's also possible that a company not using ABC may find itself being the
low bidder for manufacturing small batches of product, since its $0.40 is lower than the ABC
model of $0.46 for a batch size of 5,000 units. With its bid price based on manufacturing
overhead of $0.40but a true cost of $0.46the company may end up doing lots of production
for little or no profit.
Our example with just two activities (production and setup) illustrates how the cost per unit using
the activity based costing method is more accurate in reflecting the actual efforts associated with
production. As companies began measuring the costs of activities (instead of focusing on the
accountant's departmental classifications), they began using ABC cost information to practice
activity based management. For example, with the cost of setting up a machine now being
measured and discussed, managers began to ask questions such as:
1.Why is the cost of setting up a production machine so expensive?
2. What can be done to reduce the setup cost?
3.If the setup costs cannot be reduced, are the selling prices adequate to cover all of the
company's costsincluding the setup cost that was previously buried in the overall machine-hour
overhead rate?