You are on page 1of 2

Dr Z

Joseph Zernik, PhD


PO Box 526, La Verne, CA 91750;
Fax: 323.488.9697; Email: jz12345@earthlink.net
Blog: http://inproperinla.blogspot.com/ Scribd: http://www.scribd.com/Human_Rights_Alert

10-05-25 CNN Blog Comment


PLEASE SIGN THE PETITION - FREE RICHARD FINE

http://www.thepetitionsite.com/1/free-fine

The CNN report provide false information:

"Superior Court Judge David Yaffe found Fine in contempt after he refused to turn over financial documents
and answer questions when ordered to pay an opposing party's attorney's fees, according to court documents."

There are no honest, valid, and effectual court documents in the case of Richard Fine. That is the hallmark of
the corruption in his case and in the cases of thousands of others who are falsely held in Los Angeles County,
California.

Please notice on Utube the clip documenting the filing of Motion to Intervene in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827) at
the US Supreme Court, Washington DC. [1]

The Motion to Intervene did not address the various arguments brought up by Richard Fine himself in the
application to US Associate Justice Ruth Ginsburg. Instead, it argued that Richard Fine must be immediately
released for the simple reason that there were no records, conforming with the fundamentals of the law, to
provide the legal basis for his confinement.

Therefore, the filing provided detailed evidence of the alleged fraud in respective records of the various
agencies of the justice system:

(a) The Los Angeles Superior Court - which refuses to this date to allow access to the Register of Actions
(California civil docket) in the case;

(b) The Los Angeles Sheriff's Department - which insists to this date on fraudulently claiming that Richard
Fine was arrested and booked at an by the authority of the non-existent "Municipal Court of San Pedro";

(c) The US District Court, Los Angeles - which purported to conduct a petition for a writ of habeas corpus,
but served minutes, orders, judgment, and mandate with no valid authentication at all;

(d) The US Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit - which likewise served orders, judgments, and a mandate unsigned,
and with no authentication at all.

The US Supreme Court handled such filing the same way the other courts did - the papers simply vanished.

A declaration posted at Scribd detailed what took place: The exhibits to the declaration provided the
conformed copies that were received from the US Supreme Court as evidence of the filing. It also recorded
the phone call with the US Supreme Court the next day: Supreme Court Counsel Danny Bickell initially tried
to deny that the papers were filed and were held in his possession. Later he stated that he had not yet made the
decision whether the papers would or would not appear in the Supreme Court docket of Fine v Sheriff (09-
 Page 2/2 May 24, 2010

A827). When asked whether he was the Clerk of the Court or whether he was authorized as Deputy Clerk, he
admitted he was neither.

Regardless, Mr Bickell stated that he would made the decision... And indeed he apparently did - the papers
simply vanished with no Due Process at all...

No discrepancy notice or any other notation ever appeared in the docket to document the filing... Forget about
the First Amendment right to to "petition the Government for a redress of grievances..." The US Supreme
Court disregarded it, just like the lower courts...

The reason that the US Supreme Court refused to hear the case as presented by Fine is likely to be of the same
nature - there was no judgment or mandate in the case to take the application of Richard Fine from, and
therefore, the US Supreme Court had no jurisdiction in the matters that Richard Fine brought before that court.

For such reasons, the case and the filings of Richard Fine, futile as they may be, are of historic significance.
Richard Fine, in his filings, documented in great detail the alleged fraud in the US justice system from top to
bottom. [2]

LINKS:

[1] UTube clip - filing at the US Supreme Court in Fine v Sheriff (09-A827)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XRKUbhmoCpU
[2] Human Rights Alert submission to the United Nations:
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31632549/
10-05-19 Human Rights Alert: PowerPoint presentation, as forwarded to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton
and Attorney General Eric Holder, as part of the 2010 UPR
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30200004/
10-04-19 Press Release: Human Rights Alert (NGO) Filed UPR Report with the United Nations
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30147583/
10-04-18 Human Rights Alert: Final submission to the United Nations for the 2010 Universal Periodic
Review of the US
http://www.scribd.com/doc/30163613/
10-04-19 Human Rights Alert: Final Appendix for Submission to the United Nations for the 2010 UPR of the
United States
http://www.scribd.com/doc/31136665/
10-05-10 Human Rights Alert: Human Rights in the Digital Era – A Call for Publicly Accountable Validation
of the justice system case management and online public access systems

You might also like