Professional Documents
Culture Documents
From 2002 April I have been working in Singapore. At the boy's world under 16 team
championship Singapore finished 9th ahead of England and USA. When I started to train
Jason Goh in 2002 he was 7th at the boy's under 14 South Asian championships; his Elo
was 2070. One year later he finished 2nd at the rapid championship, knocking out 3
grandmasters on the way. He eliminated Zaw Win Lay, Adianto and in the semi-final, he
beat grandmaster Wu Shaobin. He did this before his 14th birthday. He was leading the
world under 14 championships in 2003, finishing 4-8th.
In 2004 my book on Judit Polgar was published.
7...c5! 8.Rc1!?
And this is White's point. c8 hangs after a capture on d4.
It's easy to see why this idea hasn't been considered before. The d4 square looks very
compromised and a move such as ...Qd8-a5 will surely break the back of White's centre.
Matters are not so clear, as you will see.
8...Qa5
I think this is what most Grunfeld players will do, whether surprised or not. It's just so logical to hit
c3. Yet after the coming exchange White benefits in the ending by having his Bishop on g5.
This may have prompted 8...h6!? in the most recent example I could find. Black jabs the Bishop
back to e3 and it's a question of whether ...h7-h6 is weakening or not. 9.Be3 Qa5 10.Qd2 cxd4
11.cxd4 Qxd2+ 12.Bxd2!? (I'm not sure I understand why 12.Kxd2 00 13.Nf3 was rejected)
12...00 13.Nf3 Rd8 14.Bb5 (I prefer 14.Rc7 e6 15.Ba5!? (15.Be3 Nc6 16.e5 Rd7 17.Rxd7 Bxd7
18.Kd2 Nb4 19.a3 Nd5=) 15...b6 16.Bd2 Ba6 17.e5 (17.Be3 Bxf1 18.Rxf1 Na6 19.Rb7 Nb4
20.Kd2 Nc6=) 17...Bxf1 18.Rxf1 Na6 19.Rb7 Rdc8 20.Ke2 Rc2 (20...Rc7 21.Rxc7 Nxc7 22.Rc1
Nd5) 21.a4+/=) 14...e6 (14...Bg4 is interesting: 15.Rc7! (15.d5 e6 16.Bc4 exd5 17.Bxd5 Nc6
18.Bxc6 bxc6 19.Rxc6 Re8 compensation) 15...Bxf3 16.gxf3 a6 17.Bc4 Nc6 18.d5 Ne5
19.Be2+/=) 15.00 (15.Ne5!? Nd7 16.Ba5 Nb6 17.Rd1 Bxe5 18.dxe5 Rxd1+ 19.Kxd1 Bd7 20.Bd3
Na4+/= Kruppa /Komarov I'm not sure what to believe about that last variation.) 15...Nc6 16.Bxc6
bxc6 17.Rfd1 Ba6 18.Be3
Meanwhile Kruppa and Komarov mention the crazy variation 8...cxd4 9.cxd4 Bxd4 (9...00 10.Nf3
Bg4 This time Black pretends he's playing a normal line and keeps his Queen on d8 to both hit d4
and give added firepower to his counterplay. 11.d5! And once again this seems to be the way to
put the pressure on. 11...h6 (11...Bxf3 12.gxf3 Nd7 13.Qb3+/= is on the face of it OK for Black but
long term I really trust in those White Bishops. 13...b6; 11...Nd7 12.Be2 Nb6 13.00+/= is a
relatively simplistic way to handle the Black pieces and he has not equalized yet. White could
play Qb3, Rfd1, h3; easy moves and hold at least a slight edge.) 12.Bf4 f5?!
Black wants to say that he is not afraid to duck a challenge but ...f7-f5 looks positionally poor.
There's no going back, that's the problem. 13.Bc7! I'm sure Black missed this move. 13...Qd7
14.e5+/- Bxf3 15.Qxf3 Nc6 16.Qb3! (16.dxc6 Qxc7 17.Bc4+ Kh8 18.cxb7 Qxe5+ 19.Qe3 Qa5+
20.Ke2 Rab8 21.Rb1 f4 unclear) 16...e6 (16...Nd4 17.Qc4 Rac8 18.e6 Qe8 19.Qb4!+/-) 17.Bd6
exd5 18.f4! White insists on dominating the centre. 18...Rfe8 19.Qxd5+ Kh8 20.Bc4 g5 21.g3 Ne7
22.Qb5 Nc6 23.00 gxf4 24.gxf4 Bf8 25.Rcd1 a6 26.Qb2 Bg7 27.Qf2 Rac8 28.Bd5 Ne7 29.Bf7
Red8 30.Bb3 Qe8 31.Rd3 Ng6 32.Rfd1 a5 33.Kh1 a4 34.Bd5 Kh7 35.Bxb7 Rc4 36.Rf3 a3 37.Bd5
Qa4 38.Bxc4 Qxd1+ 39.Qf1 Qa4 40.h3 Nh4 41.Rxa3 Qc2 42.Bd5 Rc8 43.Rd3 Qb2 44.Ba3 Qb5
45.Rd1 Qa4 46.Rc1 Rb8 47.Bd6 Rb2 48.Qc4 Qa5 49.Rd1 Rd2 50.Rxd2 Qxd2 51.Bc5 Ng6 52.e6
Nxf4 53.e7 Qe1+ 54.Bg1 10 Kruppa,Y-Danin,A/St Petersburg 2004) 10.Rxc8 Bxf2+ 11.Kxf2
Qxc8 12.Nf3+/-
assessing this position as clearly better for White. Black is unlikely to go in for this over the board
but if he does I append some extra analysis now: 12...00 a) 12...h6 13.Bb5+ Nc6 14.Be3+/-; b)
12...Nc6 13.Bc4 00 (13...Qg4 14.Qb3! 00 15.Bh6 Qxe4 16.Bxf7+ Rxf7 17.Qxf7+ Kxf7
18.Ng5++-) 14.Bh6 Rd8 15.Qa1+-; 13.Qb3! Nc6 14.Bh6 Rd8 15.Qb2 f6 16.Bc4+ Kh8 17.Rc1 The
dark squares are simply too weak. Perhaps this last variation is the best that Black has, but he
would surely only stumble here rather than come voluntarily.
9.Qd2 cxd4 10.cxd4 Qxd2+ 11.Kxd2
The aforementioned ending. Grunfeld players will know that the King on d2 gives them attacking
opportunities, but that if they don't get it exactly right White's central majority and pressure on the
c file may well carry the day.
Kruppa has added some interesting nuances to the usual ending scenario by putting the bishop
on g5.
11...00
Either castles or 11...Nc6 but then 12.d5 Ne5 13.Rc7!
gives the Bishop on g5 a reason to be and subjects Black to uncomfortable pressure. White has
a definite advantage here: 13...Nd7 14.Bb5 (14.Nf3!
is less committal at this stage and probably better: 14...h6 (14...Kd8 15.Bf4 Nf6 16.Ng5! Rf8
17.Rc4 h6 18.Nf3+/=) 15.Bf4 Kd8 16.Bd3 g5 17.Bg3+/-) 14...Kd8 15.d6 f6 16.Bf4 e5 (16...exd6
17.Bxd6 Bf8 18.Bg3 Ne5 19.Rc2
Whose position is the more disorganised? Seeing the extra Rook in play, I think I would prefer to
be White.) 17.Be3 Bf8 18.Bxd7 Bxd7 19.Rxb7 Bxd6 20.Ne2 (20.Rb1! Bc6 21.f3 Ke7 22.Ne2
Rhd8=/+) 20...Bc6 21.Rg7 Bb4+ 22.Nc3 Bxe4 Now it is White who will have to scrape a draw
23.a3 Bf8 24.Rf7 Bxg2 25.Rg1 Bf3 26.Rxf6 Bb7 27.Rf7 Be7 28.Bg5 Re8 29.Rxh7 Bxg5+ 30.Rxg5
Re7 31.Rxe7 Kxe7 32.Rxg6 Bh1 33.Rg1 Bc6 34.Rg6 Bh1 35.Ra6 Rh8 36.Rxa7+ Kd6 37.Ra6+
Kd7 38.Na4 Rxh2 39.Nc5+ Kc7 40.Rf6 Rh3 41.a4 Ra3 42.Kc2 Bd5 43.Kb2 Rh3 44.a5 e4 45.a6
e3 46.fxe3 Rxe3 47.a7 Re8 48.Kc3 Ra8 49.Kd4 Bc6 50.Na6+ Kb7 51.Nc5+ Kc7 52.Na6+ Kb7
53.Nb4 Be8 54.Rh6 Rd8+ 55.Kc5 Kxa7 56.Nc6+ Taborov,B-Troshohenko,P/Kiev 2004
12.Nf3
12.d5!
White has a superior exchange variation on all counts. He holds the usual passed d pawn, the c6
square and his pieces are extremely active.
Black faces a tough defence.
19...Rfc8
19...h6 20.Be7 Rfc8 21.d6 Bb2 22.Rxc8+ Rxc8 23.Rd1 Nc5 24.Bd5 Na4 gives counterplay and
perhaps should have been preferred.
20.d6 Bf8 21.Be7 Rxc1 22.Rxc1 Bxe7 23.dxe7 Re8 24.Rc6! Nb8 25.Rc7 Kg7
25...Nd7 26.Nd4! Rxe7 27.Rxa7 Kf8 28.Nxf5 gxf5 29.Rb7+26.Ne5 Nd7 27.f4
27.Nc6 a5 28.Ke3! a4 29.Bd5 Nf6 30.Kd4+27...Nxe5 28.fxe5 Be4 29.g4 f6 30.Ke3 Bg2 31.exf6+ Kxf6 32.g5+ Kg7 33.Rxa7 Bh1 34.Kf4
Bf3 35.Ke5 Bg2 36.Kd6
A rather triumphant King march.
36...Bh3 37.Bd5 10
New ideas don't crop up every day of the chess year, so if you are looking for something against
the Grunfeld I think it's well worth taking a closer look at 7 Bg5!?
It will certainly set your opponent thinking.
7...Nd7
is rather passive. In his book on the Grunfeld, Nigel Davies thinks that this is the best way for
Black to play for a win but I just don't see it. Using the simplest methods, White obtains a nice
centre with the Knight on d7 misplaced and Black's queenside difficult to develop. 8.a4! Bg7
9.Nf3 a6 (9...00 10.00+/=) 10.Be2 cxd4 11.cxd4 00 12.00+/=
White answers ...Nf6 with Qd3 and has Ba3 in the offing.;
7...Bd7 8.Be2! Bg7 9.Nf3 00
is again rather prospectless for Black. One might think this is just a normal Exchange Variation
but I remain to be convinced that the Bishop on d7 isn't just simply on the wrong square! Sure,
Black can play ...Bg4 but then it's not so easy for him: (9...cxd4 10.cxd4 Bc6 11.Qd3 00 12.00
e6 13.Ba3! Re8 (13...f5!? 14.e5 Rf7 15.Qb3! Bd5 16.Bc4 Nc6 17.Bxd5 Qxd5 (17...Na5 18.Bxe6!
Nxb3 19.axb3+/- Bf8 20.d5 Bxa3 21.Rxa3 Kg7 22.Bxf7 Kxf7 23.Rd1) 18.Qxd5 exd5 19.Rfe1+/-)
14.Rfe1 Nd7 15.Rac1+/=) 10.00 Bg4 11.Be3 cxd4 (11...Nc6 12.d5! Bxf3 13.Bxf3 Ne5 14.Bxc5+/) 12.cxd4 Nc6 13.d5 Bxf3 14.Bxf3 Bxa1 (14...Ne5 15.Be2+/- f5 16.f4 Ng4 17.Bxg4 Bxa1 18.exf5
Bf6 19.fxg6 hxg6 20.Be6+ Kg7 21.f5+/-; 14...Na5 15.Rb1 b6 16.Qd3+/-) 15.Qxa1+/- Na5 16.Bh6
f6 17.Bxf8 Kxf8 18.Bg4+/- Jimenez Villena,F-Goormachtigh,J Benidorm 2003(18.Qb2+/-)
8.d5!
And so we arrive at Mikhailchishin's choice and Beliavsky's immediate response which takes full
advantage of the Bishop still on f8.
8...Qa5
8...a6 9.Qa4!+/- Rb8 10.dxc6! axb5 11.Qxb5+-
9.Qa4!
A superb move. The tactics work in favour of White:
9...Qxc3+ (only move)
9...Qxa4 10.Bxa4+10.Ke2 Bg7
A shell-shocked Mikhailchishin cannot believe that he is lost so quickly. Yet it is true!
Perhaps 7....Nc6 just isn't playable after 6...c5, and as you can see, even top GM's don't know
this!
10...Qxa1 11.dxc6 Kd8 12.Nf3 Qf6 (12...Bh6 13.Rd1+ Kc7 14.Bf4+ Bxf4 15.Rxa1) 13.Qa5+! b6
14.Qd2+ Qd6 15.Qc3!
White players the world over are looking for ways to pressurize the Grunfeld. I think certainly that
6....c5 7 Bb5+ is the way to go and gives a small edge in every variation, whereas 6...Bg7 is far
more common and then the status of 7 Bg5!? is most unclear.
Perhaps you, the reader, would like to give these moves a try!
My thanks to Jeremy Silman and his fine site, where part of this article has already appeared.
I recently read grandmaster Krasenkow's analysis of this game. He drew the conclusion that
Kasparov comfortably equalized.
Looking back now it is easy to correct the judgement that he drew. White was always slightly
better and Black never had a chance to win. What a gloomy prospect for Kasparov! Anyway, I
have found it interesting to look at what has happened in Kramnik's line ever since. Kasparov,
Anand and even Leko who used the Grunfeld all his life seem to stay away now. Could the line
beginning with 8 h3 be the reason? Maybe not, but for the average mortal it might still work well.
8...00 9.Be2
The first game in my database is from way back: Gawlikowski-Taimanov Szcawno Zdroj 1950.
But the line was dormant for three and a half decades.
With 8 h3 White plans to develop the bishop and castle before he touches the central pawns. He
does not want to be troubled by ...Bg4.
How should Black use the time h3 gives him to undermine the centre?
9...b5
Black's main plans are connected with hitting the d4 or e4 pawns. Kasparov plays an original
move which allows him to choose later on which he will attack.
10.Be3 Bb7
So Kasparov not only gained space on the queenside, but also put pressure on the e4.
11.Qd3 cxd4
11...Nd7!? 12.00 a5 Black defends b5 in an original way. 13.dxc5 (13.Rac1!? Deserves
consideration as the rook steps out from the diagonal, in turn giving a freer hand in the centre.
The speciality of the line, Qb1 might follow. 13...Rb8 14.Bf4+/=) 13...Qc8 14.Rab1 Nxc5 15.Qxb5
(15.Bxc5 Qxc5 16.Rxb5 Qc7 17.Qe3 Although Black often has enough for a pawn on the
queenside, it is hard to say how much compensation Black has here. This time he fights for
equality.) 15...Ba6 16.Qxc5 Bxe2 17.Rfc1 Bd3 Black held the position, Nikolaidis-Delchev,
Cannes 2000.
12.cxd4 Nd7 13.00 Nb6 14.Qb1!
A strong move highlighting the drawback of Kasparov's play. The queenside becomes a target.
14.Bf4!? So that Nc4 will not come with a tempo. 14...f5 This leads to great complications.
(14...Nc4 15.a4 The b5 pawn becomes a target.) 15.Qb3+ Kh8 16.Ne5 Bxe4 (16...Qxd4 17.Nf7+
Rxf7 18.Qxf7 Qxe4 19.Bf3 White is somewhat better.) 17.Bxb5 Nd5 The position is complex.
14...Na4
Kasparov finds a defence in simplification.
14...a6 15.a4
15.Qxb5 Nc3 16.Qxb7 Nxe2+ 17.Kh1 Nxd4 18.Rad1 e5 19.Nxe5
19.Nxd4!? exd4 20.Bxd4 Bxd4 21.Qb4
Kramnik probably should have tried this ending rather than the game continuation. Why?
Because the existance of the queenside pawns favours White. Krasenkow thinks Black can hold,
but it wouldn't be fun for him.
24.Bxb6
Black can hold relatively easily as White can't avoid further exchanges of pawns.
24...Re8
24...g5
25.Bd8
It only temporarily stops exchanges.
25...Ra6 26.Bc7 Rae6 27.g4 g5 28.f5 Rc6 29.Rd7 Bxe5 30.Re1 f6 31.Bxe5 Rxe5 32.Rxe5 fxe5
33.Re7 h5 34.Kg2 hxg4 35.hxg4 Rc4 36.Kf3 Rf4+ 37.Kg3 e4
A principled move.
Black tries to find a plan where h2-h3 is a waste of time. This is not certain; White's centre looks
steady.
10.Be3 Bb7 11.Qd3 cxd4
Black can hold back taking, however this move is the most popular.
11...Nd7 12.00 Nf6 13.Nd2 Qd7 14.a4 Rfd8 15.a5 cxd4 16.cxd4 e6 17.Rfb1 White has pressure
on the queenside, Golod-Svidler, P, Blitz 2000.;
11...Qc7 12.00 Rd8 (12...Nd7 13.Rac1 e6 14.e5 Rac8 15.Ng5 Rfd8 16.Qb1 Nb8 17.Ne4 White
is a bit better, Kruppa-Elianov, Elista 2000.) 13.Rfd1 Nd7 14.Qb1 (14.a4) 14...h6 15.a4 e6 16.Ra2
Rac8 17.d5 exd5 18.exd5 c4 19.a5 White has a small advantage, Buhmann-Schulze, Germany
2000.;
11...Ba6 12.Qd2 Qd7 (12...Bxe2 13.Qxe2 Nc6 14.Rd1 (14.00 cxd4 15.cxd4 Nxd4 16.Bxd4 Bxd4
17.Rad1 e5 18.Nxe5 Qc7 19.Nxf7 Bxf2+ White's advantage will be insignificant.) 14...cxd4
15.cxd4 Rc8 16.00 Na5 17.d5 Qd7 18.Bd4 Qa4 19.Bxg7 Kxg7 20.e5 Rfd8 21.Rd4 Qc2 22.Qe3
White centre has a bigger role than the c file, Kharitonov-Jeremic, Halhidiki 2001.) 13.00 Qa4
14.Bxa6 Nxa6 15.Bh6 cxd4 16.Bxg7 Kxg7 17.cxd4 Rac8 18.h4 Nb4 19.h5 Rfd8 20.Rfd1 Qa5
21.h6+ Kg8 22.d5 White is clearly better, Shipov-Harikrishna, Blitz 2004.
12.cxd4 e6
12...Nd7 13.00 Nf6 14.Nd2 Qd7 15.a4 a5 16.Qb1 e6 17.Bd3 (17.Bb5 Bc6 18.Bxc6 Qxc6 19.Rc1
Qb7 20.f3+/=) 17...Ba6 18.Bxa6 Rxa6 19.Rc1 Rb8 20.Qd3+/=
12...Nc6 13.00 e6 14.Rad1 (14.Rfd1 Transposes to this game.) 14...Qd6 15.Qb5 Rfd8 16.Qg5
h6 17.Qg4 Qb4 18.Qh4 Qe7 19.Qg4 Draw Kruppa-Shishkin, Ukraine 2001.; 12...Ba6 13.Qa3 a)
13.Qd2 Bxe2 (13...Bb7 14.e5 Nc6 (14...Bd5 15.00 Nc6) 15.Rc1 Rc8 16.00 Na5 17.Qb4 Qd7
18.Bg5 Nc6 19.Qd2 e6 (19...Na5!?) 20.Bb5 Qd5!? (20...a6) 21.Bc4 Qd7 22.d5 exd5 23.Qxd5
Nxe5 24.Nxe5 Rashkovsky-Staniszewski, Poland 2001.) 14.Kxe2 Nc6 15.Rac1 Qd7 Wu WenjinNi Hua, China 2001. 16.d5!?; b) 13.Qc2 Bb7 14.Rd1 Nd7 15.00 Rc8 16.Qb1 e6 17.Bg5 Bf6
18.Bh6 Re8 19.Bb5+/= Podkriznik-Orel, Slovenia 2002.; 13...Bxe2 (13...Bb7 14.Bd3 Nc6
15.Rd1+/=) 14.Kxe2 Nc6 15.Rhd1 Na5 16.Rac1 Qd7 17.Bd2 Nc6 18.d5 Nd4+ 19.Nxd4 Bxd4
20.Bb4+/=
I prefer White who went on to win from this position, Prizant-Kalichkin, Tula 2000.
13.00 Nc6 14.Rfd1 Qd6 15.Rab1 Rac8 16.Bg5
16.a3!?
White could try this quiet waiting move, just denying Black b4.16...Na5 17.Bd2 Nc6 18.d5
16...e5
16...h6!? 17.Bh4 f5 This would result in a complicated fight.
17.d5 Nd4 18.Nxd4 exd4 19.Bd2 f5 20.exf5 Rxf5 21.Bg4
Black has some, probably not full compensation.
21...Qxd5 22.f3 Re5 23.Bxc8 Bxc8 24.Rbc1 Bf5 25.Qa6 d3 26.Re1 Qd4+ 27.Kh1 Qf2?
27...Qd7
This is the most common move, in a way most in the spirit of the Grunfeld.
Black wastes no time putting pressure on d4. In this line h3 has a function stopping the f3 knight
from being pinned.
Black must do something quickly otherwise White's centre will dominate.
11.Be3 Qa5+
Black plays like they often do in the main lines. This move intends to confuse White's pieces a
bit.
11...f5!?
A move which scores well for Black yet White can establish a small advantage without any
risk:12.exf5 (12.Qb3+ Kh8 13.Rd1 (13.exf5 Qa5+ 14.Bd2 Qxf5 15.Qe3 Be6= Mikanovic-Turov,
Quebec 2001.) 13...fxe4 14.Ng5 Nxd4 15.Qc4 Qa5+ 16.Rd2 Nxe2 (16...e6!?) 17.Nf7+ Rxf7
18.Qxf7 Bd7 Arencibia-Elianov, Ubeda 2001.) 12...Qa5+ 13.Qd2 Qxd2+ 14.Kxd2 Bxf5 15.Bc4+
Kh8 16.Rhd1 (16.Rad1!?+/= White is a fraction better.) 16...Na5 (16...Bxh3 Black should be not
worse with the extra pawn.) 17.Bd3 Rad8 18.Ke2+/=
White's ferocious play led to Black's defeat in 5 more moves, Pedersen, NV-Sigfussion, N,
Budapest First Saturday.
15...Qxa2
15...Bd7 16.Rxb7+/=
16.00 Bd7
16...b6 This was played only once, so I feel it is too early to evaluate the position. White should
have compensation for the pawn. 17.f4 a) 17.Bh6 Rd8 18.f4 Bh8 Unclear Pushkov-Shipov, Elista
2001.; b) 17.Bb4 Bf6 18.f4 With a complex game.(18.Bb5 a5 19.Bd2) ; 17...Bd4+ 18.Kh2 a5
19.Bb5 This position needs practical tests.
17.Rxb7 Ba4 18.Qe1
18.Qc1 has not been tried, it leads to an interesting position: 18...Rac8 (18...Rfc8 19.Rxa7)
19.Qe1 Bc2 20.Bh6 Rfe8 21.Qd2
18...Rfb8 19.Rxb8+
19.Rb4 or 19.Rb7 have been tried but they are only good for a draw.
19...Rxb8 20.Be3 Bc2 21.Qd2 a5
This keeps the position balanced.
22.f4 Bd6 23.e5 Bb4 24.Qd4 Be4 25.Qxe4 Qxe2 26.Rf2 Qb5 27.f5 Bc3 28.e6 Qb1+ 29.Qxb1
Rxb1+ 30.Kh2 Be5+
It is very hard to draw conclusions on this particular line with h3 and Be2. There is no clear way
found to neutralise it or kill the play. It is worth trying occasionally. If you are playing Black, you
need serious advance preparation or expensive losses may follow.
Supplementary Games
Gawlikowski,Stanislaw - Taimanov,Mark E [D85]
Szcawno Zdroj Szcawno Zdroj, 1950
1.Nf3 c5 2.c4 Nf6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.d4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 g6 7.e4 Bg7 8.h3 00 9.Be2 b6 10.0
0 Bb7 11.e5 cxd4 12.cxd4 Na6 13.Qa4 Nc7 14.Ba3 Qe8 15.Qb3 Qd7 16.Rad1 Bd5 17.Bc4 Rac8
18.Nd2 Bh6 19.Bxd5 Nxd5 20.Ne4 Qc6 21.Qg3 Rfe8 22.Qh4 Bg7 23.Rd3 f5 24.exf6 Bxf6 25.Qg4
Red8 26.f4 Qc4 27.Rfd1 Rc6 28.f5 Bg7 29.fxg6 Rxg6 30.Qh4 Rf8 31.Bxe7 Rf4 32.Qe1 Nxe7
33.Nd6 Qd5 01
To purchase:
US & Canada
http://www.classicalgames.com/Merchant2/merchant.mvc?Screen=P
ROD&Product_Code=000761&AFFIL=CBL
Rest of the World
http://www.chess.co.uk/shop/item901.htm