Professional Documents
Culture Documents
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
139
editor@iaeme.com
Joseph N. Mkilania
1. INTRODUCTION
A public sector is a very important sector in the economy of every country. It is a
sector that provides services that are offered by the government. The composition of
its activities varies from country to country. In Tanzania, the public sector includes
services such as the police, military, infrastructures (public roads, railways, water
supply, sewers, electrical grids, telecommunications, etc.), public education and
health care services.
The public sector represent significant investment of tax payers money, hence the
need for its preservation is very worth (Akomah and Quayson, 2016) [1]. Owing to
lack of maintenance culture in the country most of the public properties are left
without maintenance (Bavu et al., 1997) [2].
The production/services in Tanzania public sector enterprises was reported to have
fallen down, and in some cases completely halt due to poor or complete lack of plant,
equipment and infrastructure maintenance (Kundi and Masika, 2001) [3] .
It is a common practice in the Tanzanian public sector to find most of physical
assets are dilapidated, and in fact, most of them like roads, vehicles and machines are
beyond economical repair. It is ordinary to find buildings with leaking roofs and doors
without locks (Bavu et al., 1997) [2]. For that reason, they are incapable of facilitating
economical production or delivering the quality services to meet organizational or
Governmental objectives.
This situation costs the government a lot of money in terms of repair and
prematurely aged assets replacement. As a result the country's economic growth is
retarded due to improper maintenance system or reactive maintenance, which costs a
lot of money in terms of operation down time and, or poor quality of service delivery.
Maintenance best practice is a big problem in public and private sector. Investing
seems to be easy but managing and maintaining assets has proven not to be our
culture.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
140
editor@iaeme.com
1. Maintenance Policy
and strategy
Policy
Standards
Strategy
3. Maintenance Implementation
Maintenance Planning
Condition Assessment
Maintenance Budget
Maintenance Information &
System (Documentation)
Maintenance Procurement
4. Maintenance Performance
Monitoring & Review
Reporting (
Feedback)
Figure 1 Maintenance Management Process chart: Sourced from Chanter (2005) [4]
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
141
editor@iaeme.com
Joseph N. Mkilania
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
142
editor@iaeme.com
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
143
editor@iaeme.com
Joseph N. Mkilania
They were categorized into three sections; section A was concerned with
fundamental maintenance policy issues, section B with maintenance planning and
scheduling issues and section C dealt with maintenance management and issues
related to the culture of maintenance.
The factors affecting best maintenance practise were ranked on a Likert scale of 15, with the following interpretations as shown in Table I:
Table I Ranking Scale
W 0 RII 1
AN
(1)
Where:
W- is the weighing given to each factor ranging from 1 to 5. In the study, let say the
highest weight in this case it is equivalent to 5 and N is the total number of
respondents in the research. The rating of all factors to the degree of significance is
based on the value of their relative importance index (RII) as shown in Table II.
Table II Guide for degree of significance
S/NO
1
2
3
4
Degree of significance
Most significant
Significant
Less significant
Not significant
Source: Vanduhe (2012) [13]
Rating
0.76 and above
0.67-0.75
0.45-0.67
0.44 and below
4. RESULTS
A total number of 100 questionnaire copies were distributed to the public sector. The
targeted groups were maintenance professionals, engineers, maintenance planners,
technicians, managers as shown in table 3. The response was 78 out of 100 which is
78%. This achievement was obtained after extension of time and self-effort of the
researcher in making a close follow up on questionnaire collection from various
sources: such as those through emails and hard copies. Respondents summary is as
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
144
editor@iaeme.com
detailed in Table III below, it shows the respondents distribution by their designation
and percentages.
Table III Targeted number of respondents and their designation
Sector
Public
Target
100
Designation
Maintenance Manager
Engineers
Planners
Technicians
Artisans
Response
8
25
5
30
10
Response
78
Percentage Response
78
S/no
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Factors
Maintenance policy and strategy
Planning and scheduling
Materials management
Maintenance culture
Maintenance task execution
Budget
Renovation program
Data recording and storage
Reliability analysis
Resource planning
Legislation and Environmental laws
Communication and ICT
Contracts management
Rank
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
RII
0.83
0.81
0.79
0.75
0.73
0.70
0.69
0.69
0.68
0.67
0.66
0.45
0.41
Rating
Most significant
Most significant
Most significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Significant
Less significant
Not significant
5. DISCUSSIONS
5.1. Discussion on Factors affecting best maintenance practise
The field of maintenance is very broad constituting a lot of issues therefore the study
only looked at the fundamental part of maintenance factors that formulates standards
and procedures of Best Maintenance Practices in public sector. The study covered,
maintenance policy issues, planning and scheduling, and maintenance management
and maintenance culture.
According to the findings, lack of policy and strategy factor is very important
factor and it ranks number one with Relative Importance Index (RII) of 0.83; since
most of the public business objectives, maintenance operations strategies have not
been integrated to meet business requirement. However, the findings show that no
proactive maintenance regime is in place, the public sector enhances only reactive
maintenance systems.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
145
editor@iaeme.com
Joseph N. Mkilania
Findings obtained from the questionnaires analysis show that; in most of the
public sector organizations maintenance planning section (planner) does not exist, and
a computerized maintenance management system is not used for job planning and
spare parts management. Again it has been found that no standard work orders are
used. Factor on Planning and scheduling ranks number two with Relative Importance
Index (RII) of 0.81. Moreover, the findings reveal that, no equipment or plant register
is in place. Yet more, the priorities system used to determine or judge the emergency
response on a certain task are missing. Additionally, risks assessments are not
conducted effectively, backlog analysis system are not in place and lastly training and
development plan for maintenance planners and schedulers is not in place as no
maintenance planner available in most of the public organizations.
Materials management:
Budget:
The factor on lack of budget ranked number six with Relative Importance Index
(RII) of 0.70. Research results show that, maintenance budget have not been
integrated to meet maintenance demands as well as business objectives. They have
been a trend of interfering maintenance budget when money is required for other
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
146
editor@iaeme.com
Renovation Program
Research results show that no effective renovation system has been enhanced in
public sector. And also, there is no major programme of rehabilitating buildings; they
are naturally left to damage to the extent that the occupants lives are in danger. This
factor on Renovation programs ranks number seven with Relative Importance Index
(RII) of 0.69
Lack of data records and storage affect the best maintenance practise, thus it is
found to be significant with Relative Importance Index (RII) of 0.69. The factor ranks
number eight. The failure of recording and storing maintenance data is a critical issue
in most of the public institutions. The common methods used to date are the manual
data recording and filing system. This methods is outdated as is not technologically
compatible, because data cannot be easily processed and accessed by other users,
cannot be updated easily, additional handling and storage requires time and big space.
Computerized method is not famous in most of the public sectors; therefore, it is not
mostly used. However, equipment register is not functioning; no equipment history is
processed, kept and updated by using manual systems as it is a very tedious jobs.
Reliability Analysis:
The factor on Reliability analysis ranks number nine with Relative Importance
Index (RII) of 0.68. From the findings it has been learnt that; most of the public
organizations have not put in place facilities or building failure mode and failure
cause analysis in order to determine the source of damage or failure. For example if a
building wall crack, no root-cause of the crack is done. In this regards the corrective
measures taken could only be temporally measures, as the solution of the problem will
not be technically and professionally obtained.
Resource planning:
Resource planning factor is very important factor and rank number ten with
Relative Importance Index (RII) of 0.67. The findings revealed that, the public
institutions have not been effectively planning and utilizing available resources for
good service delivery. Skills are not well identified and utilized; funds are not
allocated based on the priority of the project and its implication to core business.
Lack of Legislation and Environmental policies was ranked number eleven with
Relative Importance Index (RII) of 12. The finding shows that; environmental policies
are not in place and if there is any they are not effectively practiced. However, staff
members are not trained and involved in environmental management in most of the
public institutions. Thus, maintenance operations are done without complying with
international and government environmental rules and regulations.
Planning and scheduling of maintenance tasks are best and effectively practiced
through the use of computerized maintenance system (Gupta, 2004) [14]. A
Computerized Maintenance Management Systems is still a big challenge to the public
sector in Tanzania. Gupta et al (2004) [14].The factor ranked twelfth and it is less
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
147
editor@iaeme.com
Joseph N. Mkilania
significant. The factor ranked thirteenth with Relative Importance Index (RII) of 0.45.
Hence it is less significant.
Contract Management
Conclusion
This paper has examined factors that affect best maintenance practice and
recommendations have been drawn to improve maintenance practices in Tanzania
public institutions so as to embark and establish sustainable and Best Maintenance
Practices which match with business objective and customer requirements. The paper
also highlights the magnitude of the maintenance inadequacies in public institutions
which need urgent improvement.
6. RECOMMENDATIONS
General Recommendations
The paper further observed that there is neither maintenance policy, nor national,
regional, or other maintenance bodies that deal with maintenance of equipment. It is
recommended that, the government should:
Specific Recommendations
Specific recommendations have been made on the public sector institutions to; clearly
define, establish and integrate maintenance policy and strategies into business
operations and critically analyse and execute maintenance tasks. Training and
development should be enhanced so as to improve available skills. However, the use
of computerized maintenance management is of great importance to effect materials
management and maintenance data capturing and storage. Maintenance budget
planning and control has to be integrated to match with maintenance demands. Proper
resource planning and utilization should be enhanced by ensuring that personnel with
the right skills are available and are well utilized. Maintenance department should
ensure that maintenance planning section is in place and well utilized.
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
148
editor@iaeme.com
REFERENCES
[1]
[2]
[3]
[4]
[5]
[6]
[7]
[8]
[9]
[10]
[11]
[12]
[13]
[14]
[15]
http://www.emeralinsight.com/0263-2772.htm
http://www.iaeme.com/IJMET/index.asp
149
editor@iaeme.com