2011

14 13:

029884431 :

0774969951 :

m.houari@mail.lagh-univ.dz :

029884431 :

0699732193 :

:
.
46
spss
2

2011

14 13:

.
:
Abstract
This study aimed to know and discover the managers attitudes applying the knowledge
management and their programs in Algerian public organisations, we know that the knowledge
management is not applied as comprehensive approach in all Algerian organizations. We see some
programs and activities that is aimed to manage explicit knowledge, like intranet networks,
knowledge bases, and databases etc. But there is no interested about the tacit knowledge,
therefore, this study was emphasis on a number of elements which the implementation of
knowledge management is depended on it, in the public organizations, and know if these elements
are available by level it contributes to applications of knowledge management in organizations or
not ? From the managers opinion , these elements are:
The level of a carrying out the core processes for (k. M) like: production knowledge, creation ,
implementation, participation, distribution, and application knowledge.
The level of human resources readiness to applying (k. M) and there programs.
The level of technologys readiness to applying (k. M) and there programs . The level of available
knowledges merge, which majoring in practices and deferent managerial activities.
In order to achieve the objectives of this study. The researcher was preparing a questionnaire, for
gathering of a primacy datas from individuals of organizations , the questionnaire include ( 46 ) a
paragraph that covered the core elements, a gathering and analysis of datas flowed, and
experimentation of hypotheses, the counting of a (SPSS )is by employment of bundle, and
description of distance of analyzing, performance for study, analyzing of difference satisfied study.
The study was reached to one important result witch is : there is not readiness to applying(k. M)
and there programs in Algerians society.

.
,
,
,

..

,
3

2011

14 13:

...

,
"

"

.
.1

.
:

:
4

.2

2011

14 13:

:(1)

.3

.4
-

14 13:

2011

.
:

.5

.
.
:

.II

.1

.
.
)

(10)
"

(
.

.
:
.

.3
:

(70)
(2 )

(%70)

(49)
6

.2

1.3

14 13:

2011

(48)
:
:

:
.

(46)

( 10 - 1)

( 31 -11 )

( 38 - 32)

( 46 -39)

:
5

1
.

:(1)
1
2
3
4
5

100
80
60
40
20

(3

60
(3

(
(

)
:

60
:

( spss

2.3
)

14 13:

2011

(one sample T-TEST )

(spearman)

one way anova (F)

( 30 )

.
:
.

3.3

,
Face Validity
.
,

.
(47)

(1

):
:(2)

10

( 10 - 1)

21

( 31 -11 )

( 38 - 32)

( 46 -39)

14 13:

2011

(3)

91.53

90.88

.
:

(10-3)

:(3)

80.05
91.53
88.17
89.04

90.88

3.3

Microsoft Excel
:

SPSS
:
.

( 10 1 )
(4)
(3.30 )
3

3.19

(3.02 )

3.28

(3.02 )
9

2011

14 13:

(3.81 )
(1.2174)

(3.002)

3
:(4)

1.250

3.30

1.011

3.02

1.327

3.02

1.142

2.85

1.362

3.81

1.173

3.19

6
.

1.060

2.53

1.297

3.28

1.290

2.66

1.262

2.40

10

1.2174

3.006

( 31 11 )

(5 )

(3)

10

14 13:

2011

(-3)

( 3)
( 31 28 27 26 23 24 19 20 2122)

(2.81 2.74 2.94 2.94 2.32 2.21 2.87 2.87 2.94)

.
. (1.277)

(3.065)
(18-3)
:(5)

1.229

2.57

11

1.469

3.13

12

1.375

3.26

13
(

1.397

2.51

14

1.441

2.57

1.290

3.66

1.041

4.30

1.009

3.64

1.131

2.94

19

1.345

2.87

20

1.397

3.30

15

(
)

16
17

(
/

18

21
(

1.244

2.87

22
.

11

14 13:

2011

1.141

2.21

23

1.144

2.32

24

1.433

3.23

1.223

2.94

1.358

2.94

1.390

2.74

25
.
26

27

28
.( ...

1.285

3.04

29

1.213

3.53

30

1.262

2.81

31

1.277

3.065

( 38 32 )
.
( 6)
(4.17-3.04)

" ( 33)
(5)

(3.04)

. (1.744)

"

(32 34 35 36 38)
" (37)

(3.32 3.62 3.34 3.40 3.98)

"

(-3)

.(4.18)
(3.553)

.
:(6)

1.416

3.32

(CBIS)

12

32

2011

14 13:

1.744

3.04

1.453

3.62

(Intranet)

33
34
.

1.256

3.34

35

1.469

3.40

36

1.110

4.17

37
(web page)

1.170

3.98

1.825

3.553

"

"

38

:
( 38 31 )
...
(20-3)
.
: (7)

1.082

2.79

39

0.972

2.57

40

1.125

2.68

41

0.965

2.64

42

1.024

2.68

43

1.089

2.66

44

1.141

2.79

45

13

2011

14 13:

1.108

2.89

1.06325

2.7125

46

(2.89-2.57)

"

"

.
(2.58)

"

" (40)

0.972
"
(2.89)

(46)
"

(2.7125)

(-3)

. (1.108)
.
:
(6-1)
)

.
.

(8)
:(8)
0.753

2.848

0.428

1.23

0.397

2.87

0.890

3.23

1.160

4.21

0.890

2.70

14

2011

14 13:

(2.70 2.87 1.23)

(4.21 3.23)

.
.
3

.
:
(3)

T
.

( 5)

11.960

t
.(

0 .05)
24.715

=.000)

:
: (9)
df

3.66

2.93

3.32
341
3.19
4.21
3.54
2.84
3.66
3.04
2.77
2.94
3.56
3.66
2.92
3.00
4.04
4.60
3.93

2.72
2.63
2.52
3.41
2.85
2.22
2.90
2.28
2.03
2.21
2.70
2.85
2.10
2.15
3.28
3.99
3.34

3.30
3.02
3.02
2.85
3.81
3.19
2.53
3.28
2.66
2.40
2.57
3.13
3.26
2.51
2.57
3.66
4.30
3.64

15

.000

46

18.093

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46

20.496
15.611
17.120
19.176
18.655
16.373
17.317
14.134
13.056
14.360
14.599
16.234
12.323
12.250
19.484
28.310
24.715

2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

2011

14 13:

3.27
3.27
3.71
3.24
2.55
2.66
3.65
3.30
3.33
3.15
3.42
3.89
3.18
3.73
3.55
4.04
3.71
3.84
4.50
4.32
3.10
2.86
3.01
2.92
2.98
2.98
3.12
3.22

:
2.60
2.48
2.89
2.51
1.88
1.98
2.81
2.58
2.54
2.34
2.67
3.18
2.44
2.90
2.53
3.19
2.97
2.97
3.84
3.64
2.47
2.29
2.35
2.35
2.38
2.34
2.45
2.57

2.94
2.87
3.30
2.87
2.81
2.32
3.23
2.94
2.94
2.74
3.04
3.53
2.81
3.32
3.04
3.62
3.34
3.40
4.17
3.38
2.79
2.57
2.68
2.64
2.68
2.66
2.79
2.89

.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000
.000

46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46
46

SPSS

17.803
14.639
16.179
15.824
13.297
13.897
15.475
16.458
14.825
13.533
16.237
19.959
15.255
16.072
11.960
17.067
18.235
15.883
25.765
23.312
17.657
18.152
16.338
18.740
17.952
16.743
16.749
17.605

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46

5.3

(T-Test)
(0.05

(P-Value> )

(T)

(F)

(T)
.

(F)

: (Ha)
:H01
.

16

14 13:

2011

:
(0.05)

(10)
(00)

(1.645)

(T )

( 17.003)

(T )

(46)

(3 )

(3.006)

.
:(10)

T-Test

T
00

46

1.645

17.003

3.006

H01

:
: H02

(11)
(0.05)

(1.645)

(00)
(T )

(16.45)

(T )

(46)

.(3)

(3.065)

.
:(11)

T-Test

17

14 13:

2011

00

46

1.645

16.45

3.065

H02

:
:Ho3
.

:
(0.05)
46

(12)

(00)

(1.645)

(T)

(16.45)

(3)

(3.553)

(T)

.
:(12)

T-Test

00

46

1.645

18.33

3.553

H03

:
H04
.

(13)

:
(0.05)
46

(1.645)

(00)
(T)

(17.52)

( 3)
18

(2.7165)

(T)

2011

14 13:

:Ha4"
"
:(13)

T-test

T
00

46

1.645

17.52

2.7125

H04

.
)
(
(one way anova)
.

(14)

(one way anova)

3.472

df
3.04

3.468

1.361

3.00

8.296

0.314

845.
1.695

2.320

2.60

6.81

0.215

0.788

1.70

2.37

6.815

0.394

1.84

2.625

2.37

12.675

0.35

1.463

2.295

0.388
0.485

df
2.147

:(14)

7.6128

:
:H0

( ...

19

2011

14 13:

(4-1)
(3.553)
(3.065)
( 3)

.(2.712)

(T-TEST)
20

14 13:

2011

:
(One Sample T-Test)
t -test

: (15)

t -test

0.00

1.645

17.003

3.006

0.00

1.645

16.45

3.065

0.00

1.645

18.33

3.553

0.00

1.645

17.52

2.7125

0.00

1.645

17.33

3.085
:

(0.05)

(1.645)

46

(00)

(T)

(17.33)

(3 )

(T)

(3.085)

.
:

.
:

(3.085)

,
.

(3.553)

21

2011

14 13:

.
(3.006)
.

.
(3.553)

.
-

,
(2.7125)

.
,
,

"

"

(3.553)

, (2.712)

"

"
-

.
:
:
.

22

2011

14 13:

,
,
.

,
"

"

,
,

)
,
.(

,
,

,
.

,
-

23

2011

14 13:

.
,

.
,

,
,

,
.
-

) .

.(

.1
.2004

.2005

.2

.3
. 2004

. 2005

.4

.5

2005
. 2002
.2004

.6
.7

24

2011

14 13:

.2005

.8
.9

.2005
.10

"

"
.2007

.2007

.11

.12

.2004/03/10-9

.13

.2006
"

"
.2005

.14
27 - 25

"
.2005

.15

27 - 25
.16
.2006

"

"
.2007/12/5-4

25

.17

14 13:

2011

.18

.2006

"

"

.19

.2007/12/5

.20
.2004

28-26
.21

.2007

. 2005/

/28-265

. 2005/

.22

.23

/28-23

"

.24
"

. 2007/12/5-4
-

"
"

.25
"

. 2004

28-26
.26

.2006

26

14 13:

2011

.2005/

.27

/26-25
.28

27 25

.2005

.29

-27-26

.2006/04/28

.30

2007
:

.31

-26

.2006 /4/ 27

.32

"

.33

:
. 2005/

/26-25

"
27 25

.2005

.34

.2004

.35

.2003

.36

"
. 2005

"
27

14 13:

2011

. 2003

.37
.38
.2005
-

.39

.2002

.40
2007

. 2003

.41

OUVRAGES
42.Turban, et al and others, Information Technology for Management:
Transforming Organizations in the Digital Economy, 5th edition, Willey Higher
Education, 2006.
43.Bartlett ,ghoshal,s. and birkinshaw,transnational management, Boston,
McGraw hill,2004.
44.B.Martinet & J.M Ribault, "La veille technologique, concurrentielle et
technologique: sources, mthodologie,organisation", les edition d'organisation,
paris,1989.
45.Michael Porter, Choix stratgique et concurrence, conomica, Paris, 1986
LES SIMINAIRES, REVUS, JOURNAUX ET RAPPORT
46.Atkinson Robert, Proposing in an Era of Economic Transformation,
Economic Development Journal, summer 2005
47.Dietrich A.," La Dynamique Des Comptences, Point Aveugle Des Techniques
Managriales", Formation Emploi, n 67, juillet septembre, 1999.
48.GHOUFI A., Recherche scientifique et dveloppement technologique en
Algrie: Multidisciplinarit et synergie, incolloque international sur l'conomie
de la connaissance, U.Biskra, 12/13 Novembre 2005.
49.houari maaradj,ahmed madjedel,managing knowledge in a Saudi vocational
training organization,didaxis,volume1,n 1,December 2007.
50.Khelfaoui Hocine,"La science en Algrie", La science en Afrique laube du
21 sicle, 2001.
51.Malhotra Yogesh,"Knowledge Management for e-Business Performance:
Advancing Information Strategy to Internet Time", Information Strategy, the
Executives Journal, Vol. 16(4), summer, 2000.

28

2011

14 13:

52.Michel Grundstein, Le Management Des Connaissances Dans L'entreprise

Problmatique, Axe De Progrs, Orientations, research report, MG Conseil,
juillet 2002.
53.Tsoukas H., V. ladimirou E," What Is Organizational Knowledge ?", Journal of
Management Studies, 38/7.2001.

29