Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
ScienceDirect
Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta 189 (2016) 96109
www.elsevier.com/locate/gca
Abstract
Salinity and temperature dictate the buoyancy of seawater, and by extension, ocean circulation and heat transport. Yet
there remain few widely applicable proxies for salinity with the precision necessary to infer all but the largest hydrographic
variations in the past. In the last decade the hydrogen isotope composition (2H/1H or d2H) of microalgal lipids has been
shown to increase systematically with salinity, providing a foundation for its use as a paleosalinity proxy. Culture and eld
studies have indicated a wide range of sensitivities for this response, ranging from about 0.63.3 ppt1 depending on the
lipid, location and/or culturing conditions. Lacking in these studies has been the controlled conditions necessary to isolate
the response to salinity while keeping all other growth parameters constant. Here we show that the hydrogen isotope composition of lipids in the marine coccolithophorid Emiliania huxleyi grown in chemostats increased by 1.6 0.3 ppt1
(p < 0.05) in eight individual alkenones and by 2.0 0.1 ppt1 (p < 0.05) in three individual fatty acids over the salinity
range 20 42 ppt. Hydrogen isotope ratios of phytol and the sterol 24-methyl-cholest-5,22-dien-3b-ol (brassicasterol) also
increased with salinity but correlations were weaker than for the acetogenic lipids. For eight individual alkenones, linear
regression analyses of the fractionation factors on salinity yielded slopes of 1.22.2 ppt1. This sensitivity of d2Halkenone
to salinity is 4571% of that previously reported for E. huxleyi, which can be attributed to the fact that previous experiments
were performed with batch cultures in which growth rates and other parameters diered between salinity treatments. The
underlying cause of this response to salinity remains unknown, but may result from changes in (1) the proportion of lipid
hydrogen derived from NADPH versus water, (2) the proportion of lipid hydrogen derived from NADPH from Photosystem
I versus the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway (and other metabolic sources), or (3) the d2H value of intracellular water.
2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords: Hydrogen isotopes; Hydrogen isotope fractionation; Lipid biomarkers; Marine phytoplankton; Continuous cultures;
Emiliania huxleyi; Coccolithophorid; Alkenones; Fatty acids; Salinity
1. INTRODUCTION
The salinity of seawater inuences ocean circulation and
on glacial-interglacial timescales is dictated by regional precipitation, evaporation, runo, and sea ice, and globally by
continental ice volume. Notwithstanding the importance of
this parameter in paleoceanography and paleoclimatology
there remain few reliable means to reconstruct it in the geologic record. Presently the best estimates of past ocean
salinity are reconstructed from the residuals of oxygen isotope
measurements
(d18O = (18O/16O)sample/(18O/16OVSMOW)1, where VSMOW is Vienna Standard Mean
Ocean Water) in planktonic foraminifera after correcting
for the temperature and global ice volume signals, yielding
estimates for d18Owater (Schmidt, 1999). The derived
d18Owater values are then typically converted to salinity
based on the assumption of a constant relationship between
d18Owater and salinity. This method often has large
97
98
Table 1
Hydrogen isotope ratios and per-cell concentrations of fatty acids, phytol and brassicasterol from continuous cultures of E. huxleyi grown at
six salinities between 20 and 42 ppt. All d2H values and concentrations are averages of 3 measurements. Concentration values have a 1-sigma
uncertainty of approximately 13%.
Salinity (ppt)
Lab ID
Water
Brassicasterol
Phytol
C14:0
C16:0
C18:1
d2H
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
20
1
22
2
22
3
27
1
32
5
32
6
32
10
37
6
42
9
70.7
0.08
0.31
345
2.5
0.704
0.0024
0.09
408
1.0
0.638
0.001
1.03
280
1.6
0.775
0.0017
0.38
284
2.8
0.770
0.0030
0.85
207
1.0
0.853
0.0011
74.5
0.08
0.25
353
1.9
0.699
0.0019
0.12
403
0.8
0.646
0.001
1.08
299
1.9
0.758
0.0021
0.39
280
1.8
0.778
0.0020
0.79
227
2.0
0.835
0.0021
74.4
0.02
0.30
354
3.5
0.698
0.0035
0.07
389
4.8
0.660
0.005
1.08
300
1.3
0.756
0.0014
0.36
291
0.7
0.766
0.0008
0.78
240
2.6
0.821
0.0028
75.8
0.11
0.24
365
2.6
0.687
0.0026
0.09
393
3.0
0.657
0.003
0.81
294
0.5
0.764
0.0006
0.26
295
3.3
0.763
0.0036
0.48
217
1.0
0.847
0.0011
74.4
0.18
0.23
359
2.8
0.692
0.0027
0.08
410
2.8
0.638
0.003
1.29
293
1.5
0.764
0.0016
0.41
271
3.4
0.787
0.0037
0.92
215
0.1
0.848
0.0001
73.6
0.13
0.09
355
2.3
0.696
0.0023
0.05
420
2.3
0.626
0.002
0.43
283
1.8
0.774
0.0020
0.14
289
3.8
0.767
0.0041
0.28
215
2.0
0.847
0.0022
67.3
0.06
0.25
351
2.4
0.696
0.0023
0.04
368
2.5
0.677
0.002
1.02
273
1.6
0.780
0.0018
0.31
285
1.6
0.766
0.0017
0.51
209
3.3
0.848
0.0036
74.0
0.25
0.41
344
4.6
0.709
0.0046
0.11
380
4.1
0.670
0.004
1.39
261
2.4
0.798
0.0026
0.38
266
0.9
0.793
0.0010
0.84
195
2.3
0.869
0.0025
73.7
0.17
0.11
336
1.9
0.717
0.0019
0.04
354
2.1
0.698
0.002
0.29
249
1.9
0.811
0.0020
0.10
234
2.4
0.827
0.0026
0.22
183
1.5
0.882
0.0016
99
Table 2
Hydrogen isotope ratios and percell concentrations of alkenones from continuous cultures of E. huxleyi grown at six salinities between 20
and 42 ppt. All d2H values and concentrations are averages of 3 measurements. Concentration values have a 1-sigma uncertainty of
approximately 13%.
Salinity (ppt)
Lab ID
Water
C37:2 Me
C37:3 Me
C38:2 Me
C38:3 Me
C38:2 Et
C38:3 Et
C39:2 Et
C39:3 Et
d2H
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
[CL] pg cell1
d2H
SD
a
SD
20
1
22
2
22
3
27
1
32
5
32
6
32
10
37
6
42
9
70.7
0.08
0.87
247
4.2
0.810
0.0045
0.49
267
1.8
0.788
0.0019
0.08
242
0.3
0.815
0.0003
0.16
260
0.5
0.796
0.0006
0.21
257
2.6
0.799
0.0028
0.16
262
1.7
0.794
0.0018
0.04
253
1.6
0.804
0.0018
0.04
261
2.3
0.795
0.0025
74.5
0.08
0.97
241
2.9
0.820
0.0032
0.61
256
1.4
0.804
0.0015
0.14
244
3.5
0.817
0.0038
0.27
262
2.2
0.797
0.0023
0.42
254
2.4
0.807
0.0026
0.29
265
1.0
0.794
0.0011
0.08
254
2.2
0.806
0.0024
0.06
260
2.7
0.800
0.0029
74.4
0.02
0.90
240
0.8
0.822
0.0009
0.40
262
4.9
0.797
0.0053
0.07
243
3.3
0.818
0.0035
0.19
260
2.6
0.800
0.0028
0.20
255
3.0
0.805
0.0032
0.20
264
1.7
0.795
0.0018
0.05
255
3.4
0.805
0.0036
0.05
263
4.2
0.796
0.0045
75.8
0.11
0.63
239
4.4
0.823
0.0048
0.29
257
4.3
0.803
0.0046
0.07
232
3.8
0.831
0.0041
0.17
257
3.4
0.803
0.0036
0.21
250
1.9
0.812
0.0021
0.20
258
0.8
0.803
0.0009
0.05
247
2.3
0.815
0.0025
0.05
261
0.7
0.800
0.0007
74.4
0.18
0.81
236
3.1
0.826
0.0033
0.54
251
3.5
0.809
0.0037
0.10
238
2.6
0.824
0.0018
0.18
256
3.1
0.804
0.0044
0.32
253
0.3
0.808
0.0004
0.21
251
0.7
0.809
0.0002
0.06
248
3.5
0.813
0.0028
0.05
247
4.1
0.814
0.0044
73.6
0.13
0.45
240
1.7
0.821
0.0019
0.24
242
4.6
0.818
0.0050
0.12
235
3.3
0.826
0.0035
0.27
253
4.5
0.807
0.0048
0.39
248
3.7
0.812
0.0040
0.29
255
2.6
0.804
0.0028
0.08
248
4.4
0.811
0.0047
0.07
252
4.5
0.808
0.0049
67.3
0.06
0.58
227
1.8
0.829
0.0019
0.36
245
2.2
0.810
0.0024
0.06
220
4.0
0.837
0.0043
0.11
244
3.0
0.811
0.0032
0.23
239
1.9
0.816
0.0021
0.16
241
3.1
0.814
0.0033
0.04
231
2.1
0.824
0.0023
0.04
240
1.9
0.815
0.0021
74.0
0.25
0.84
219
1.6
0.844
0.0017
0.43
238
4.3
0.823
0.0046
0.06
203
3.5
0.860
0.0038
0.12
234
4.3
0.827
0.0064
0.24
229
2.5
0.833
0.0027
0.19
233
0.9
0.828
0.0009
0.05
223
2.8
0.840
0.0031
0.05
229
2.2
0.832
0.0024
73.7
0.17
0.38
215
2.6
0.847
0.0028
0.14
233
2.3
0.828
0.0024
0.04
198
2.8
0.866
0.0030
0.12
230
4.1
0.832
0.0045
0.25
234
3.4
0.826
0.0037
0.26
239
1.0
0.822
0.0011
0.04
222
2.5
0.839
0.0027
0.05
233
2.6
0.828
0.0028
100
(60 m 0.25 mm 0.25 lm, 1.1 mL/min He) for acetylated alcohol fractions containing the sterol and phytol.
The oven was programmed to hold 120 C for 10 min,
increase to 220 C at 20 C/min, increase to 300 C at
2 C/min, increase to 325 C at 10 C/min, and hold 325 C
for 5 min. The GC was equipped with an Agilent VF200 ms capillary column (60 m 0.25 mm 0.25 lm,
1.5 mL/min He) for ketone fractions containing the alkenones.
As shown in Fig. 2, Baseline separation of all 8 alkenones
was achieved using GC methods adapted from Longo
et al. (2013). The oven was programmed to hold 120 C
for 1 min, increase to 255 C at 15 C/min, increase to
300 C at 1 C/min, increase to 320 C at 10 C/min, and
hold 325 C for 10 min. External standards of known
hydrogen isotopic composition including nC26-alkane
(54.9, CAS # 630-01-3), nC32-alkane (212.4, CAS
# 544-85-4), nC38-alkane (102.6, CAS # 7194-85-6)
and nC44-alkane (199.9, CAS # 7098-22-8) (Dr. Arndt
Schimmelmann, Indiana University, http://pages.iu.edu/
~aschimme/les/list%20of%20n-alkanes.pdf) were injected
throughout each run and used to correct lipid data as
described in detail in (Nelson and Sachs, 2014a). Fatty
acids were corrected for methylation and sterol for acetylation by mass balance. The precision of d2H measurements
of external standards through the course of this study was
3.6. Detailed parameters for GC-irMS runs are provided
in Table EA5.
3. RESULTS
3.1. Cellular lipid concentrations
Per cell concentrations of the 13 lipids analyzed varied
between 0.04 and 1.4 pg cell1 with no statistically signicant
co-variations with salinity (i.e., 0.1 < p < 0.4) (Tables 1 and 2).
Fig. 2. Chromatograms from GC-irMS for E. huxleyi chemostat culture ESN42.9 grown at a salinity of 42 ppt. Baseline separation of all 8
alkenones was routinely achieved. The top panel is the ratio of m/z 3 (2H1H) to m/z 2 (1H1H). The middle panel is the intensity of the m/z 2
ion. The bottom panel is the intensity of the m/z 3 ion. The peak identications are shown in the middle panel along with the peak areas. Peaks
less than 12 Vs were rerun at higher concentrations to obtain accurate d2H values. All cultures had similar chromatograms.
101
Fig. 3. Uk
37 values and associated temperatures using the Prahl
et al. (1988) temperature calibration were unaected by salinity.
They averaged 0.654 0.042 and 18.1 1.2 C (N = 9), respectively. The latter compares favorably to the actual temperature at
which the cultures were maintained, 19 1 C (black arrow).
Fatty acids were between 0.1 and 1.4 pg cell1 with myristic
acid (C14:0) generally in highest abundance, followed by
oleic acid (C18:1) and palmitic acid (C16:0). Per cell concentrations of phytol were between 0.04 and 0.12 pg cell1 while
those of 24-methyl-cholest-5,22-dien-3b-ol (brassicasterol)
were between 0.09 and 0.41 pg cell1.
Of the four pairs of alkenone isomers (C37Me, C38Me,
C38Et, C39Et) the C37 methyl alkenones were in highest
abundance, with C37:2Me between 0.38 and 0.97 pg cell1
and C37:3Me between 0.14 and 0.61 pg cell1. Concentrations of C38:3Et, the next most abundant alkenone, were
between 0.16 and 0.29 pg cell1, while those of C38:2Et
were between 0.2 and 0.42 pg cell1. In next highest abundance C38:3Me varied in concentration between 0.11 and
0.27 pg cell1, followed by C38:2Me which varied between
0.04 and 0.14 pg cell1. In lowest abundance were the C39
ethyl alkenones, which varied between 0.04 and
0.08 pg cell1.
The alkenone unsaturation ratio commonly used
for sea surface temperature reconstructions, Uk
37 (=C37:2/
(C37:2 + C37:3)) averaged 0.654 0.042 (N = 9) and did
Table 3
Linear regression statistics for a as a function of salinity in 13 E. huxleyi lipids. All regressions were signicant at the 95% level (i.e., p < 0.05)
except for phytol (p = 0.10) and brassicasterol (p = 0.19).
Lipid
R2
p level
Slope (ppt1)
Slope SE (ppt1)
Intcpt
Intcpt SE
C37:2Me
C37:3Me
C38:2Me
C38:3Me
C38:2Et
C38:3Et
C39:2Et
C39:3Et
Alkenones (N = 8)
0.80
0.89
0.80
0.86
0.75
0.85
0.81
0.87
0.7847
0.7621
0.7663
0.7615
0.7765
0.7612
0.7676
0.7593
0.00808
0.00647
0.01297
0.00734
0.00814
0.00736
0.00937
0.00757
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
9
0.68
0.54
0.63
0.00053
0.00071
0.00055
0.7149
0.7201
0.7938
0.01599
0.02143
0.01665
9
9
9
Sterol
Phytol
0.23
0.34
0.00142
0.00159
0.00225
0.00159
0.00124
0.00155
0.00169
0.00171
0.00163
0.00029
0.00205
0.00202
0.0019
0.00199
0.00008
0.00059
0.00178
0.00027
0.00021
0.00043
0.00024
0.00027
0.00024
0.00031
0.00025
C14:0
C16:0
C18:1
Fatty acids (N = 3)
0.0011
0.0001
0.0012
0.0003
0.0024
0.0004
0.0009
0.0002
Avg
SD
0.0059
0.0243
0.0104
Avg
SD
0.1928
0.0992
0.00041
0.00094
0.6824
0.6039
0.01245
0.02846
9
9
(1.63)
(0.29)
(1.99)
(0.08)
102
Fig. 4. Hydrogen isotope fractionation (a) factors for 8 alkenones, 3 fatty acids, one sterol, and phytol from chemostats of E. huxleyi. Three
separate chemostat experiments were conducted at 32 ppt, and two at 22 ppt salinity. All values are averages of 3 measurements (i.e., N = 3
for all analyses). Error bars represent the propagated error for the lipid and water and are smaller than the symbol in some cases. The d2H
dierence between water and lipid, the per mil enrichment factor e (= (1 a)*1000), is shown on the right axis.
same saturation state by about 416 (Fig. 4). These ndings are consistent with those reported for suspended particulate alkenones from the Chesapeake Bay estuary (Schwab
and Sachs, 2009, 2011).
4. DISCUSSION
4.1. Mechanisms responsible for greater 2H/1H fractionation
at higher salinity
Before the application of continuous cultures, prior
explanations for the decrease in 2H/1H fractionation in
microalgal lipids with increasing salinity in culture and eld
studies fell into two main categories. The rst and most
widely discussed in the literature calls upon an increase in
the d2H value of intracellular water by one or more of several possible mechanisms as salinity increases, and the subsequent transfer of this 2H-enrichment to all lipids either
directly from water or indirectly via reduced nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH) or nicotinamide
adenine dinucleotide (NADH) (Sachse and Sachs, 2008;
Sachs and Schwab, 2011; Heinzelmann et al., 2015a). This
explanation is attractive because it can account for the fact
that an increase in alipid-water is observed in all lipid classes
from both prokaryotes and eukaryotes as salinity increases
(Sachse and Sachs, 2008). The second explanation called
upon a decrease in growth rate, and consequent increase
in alipid-water, as salinity increased (Sachs and Schwab,
2011). The continuous culture results reported here rule
out the possibility that growth rate changes are the sole
cause of the fractionation response to salinity since they
were held constant across treatments.
At the most basic level the hydrogen in lipids can be considered to derive from two sources, NAD(P)H and intracellular water. Although strictly speaking acetogenic lipids
such as fatty acids and alkenones derive about 50% of their
hydrogen directly from NAD(P)H, 25% from cell water,
and 25% from acetyl-CoA (Saito et al., 1980; Robins
et al., 2003; Schmidt et al., 2003; X. Zhang et al., 2009),
the acetyl hydrogens in the latter ultimately derive from
glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GAP), via pyruvate, which
receives its hydrogen from water and NADPH. Similarly,
isoprenoid lipids derive 2040% of their hydrogen directly
from NADPH and the remainder from either acetyl-CoA
(MVA pathway) or pyruvate and GAP (DOXP/MEP pathway) (Sessions et al., 2002), and therefore from water and
NADPH.
NADP+ is reduced by ferredoxin-NADP+ reductase
in Photosystem 1 (PS1) of photosynthesis, resulting
in highly 2H-depleted NADPH (approximately 600
(Luo et al., 1991; Schmidt et al., 2003)). It can also be
reduced by glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase and
6-phosphogluconate in the cytosolic oxidative pentose
phosphate pathway (OPP), resulting in NADPH with a
higher d2H value than that from photosynthesis because it
acquires hydride from hexose metabolites rather than
photooxidized water (Hayes, 2001; Schmidt et al., 2003).
The relative proportions of hydrogen from intracellular
water and NADPH on the one hand, and NADPH from
either PS1 or OPP on the other, can be expressed with
the simple mass balance model:
d2 H lipid f d2 H NADPH =PS1 x d2 H NADPH =opp 1 x
1 f d2 H water
103
104
Fig. 6. Schematic outlining hydrogen sources for the methyl group of pyruvate from dierent pathways. In (a) at least 2 of 3 methyl
hydrogens are from intracellular water when pyruvate is synthesized via malic enzyme with malate derived from the TCA cycle: the enzyme
fumarase adds 1 hydrogen from water and then the synthesis of pyruvate via malic enzyme adds another hydrogen from cell water. In (b) at
least 1 of 3 methyl hydrogens come from cell water during glycolytic production of pyruvate: glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate generated from
glucose during glycolysis follows several steps in conversion to phosphoenoylpyruvate and maintains the methylene group with 2 hydrogens
originally from glucose. The synthesis of pyruvate from phosphoenolpyruvate via the enzyme pyruvate kinase adds one hydrogen from the cell
water and should therefore be relatively more 2H-depleted compared to malate-derived pyruvate.
105
isotopic composition of alkenones from the coccolithophorid E. huxleyi of 1.6 0.3 ppt1 (Fig. 4). This
sensitivity of alkenone d2H to salinity is about half the
3.03.3 ppt1 value reported by Schouten et al. (2006).
Because it is derived from chemostat cultures it is suggested
that the lower sensitivity be used in paleosalinity reconstructions, such as those proposed by Rohling (2007), van
der Meer et al. (2007) and Leduc et al. (2013). In addition,
owing to the range of salinity sensitivities for eight dierent
alkenones, which ranged from 1.2 to 2.2 ppt1 in this
study, it is suggested that the d2H values of individual alkenones be used in paleosalinity calculations, rather than mixtures of alkenones (as recommended in (van der Meer et al.,
2013)).
An additional outcome of this study is conrmation that
there is no relationship between salinity and alkenonederived temperature estimates. Based on the Prahl et al.
(1988) calibration, Uk
37-derived temperatures averaged
0.654 0.042 and 18.1 1.2 C, respectively, for the 9 cultures across the 22 ppt range of salinity (Fig. 3). This value
was similar to the 19 1 C temperature at which the cultures were maintained. Paleotemperature reconstructions
from alkenone unsaturation ratios are therefore expected
to be unaected by salinity changes, at least where
E. huxleyi is the primary alkenone producer.
5. CONCLUSION
With the use of chemostat cultures the direct eect of
salinity on the d2H values of alkenones, fatty acids, phytol,
and a sterol in E. huxleyi has been determined. d2H values
of alkenones increased linearly with salinity by 1.6
0.3 ppt1 over the salinity range 2042 ppt. Seven of
the eight alkenones synthesized by this species (C37:2Me,
C37:3Me, C38:3Me, C38:2Et, C38:3Et, C39:2Et, C39:3Et)
had d2H values that increased with salinity by 1.2
1.7 ppt1, while one (C38:2Me) had d2H values that
increased by 2.2 ppt1, all signicant at the 95% condence level. Tri-unsaturated alkenones were 2H-depleted
relative to di-unsaturated alkenones by about 1020,
C37Me alkenones were 2H-enriched relative to C38Et alkenones of the same saturation state by about 36, and
both of the former were 2H-enriched relative to C38Me
and C39Et alkenones of the same saturation state by about
416.
d2H values of all three fatty acids produced by this species (myristic acid, C14:0; palmitic acid, C16:0; oleic acid,
C18:1) also increased linearly with salinity, by 2.0
0.1 ppt1 (p < 0.05). Neither phytol nor brassicasterol
had a statistically signicant change in d2H with salinity.
Possible causes of the greater enrichment of 2H in lipids
at higher salinity include an increased proportion of hydrogen from cellular water at the expense of NAD(P)H,
increased proportions of metabolically-produced NAD(P)
H relative to photosynthetic NADPH, and an increase in
the d2H value of intracellular water.
Irrespective of the specic mechanism underlying the
salinity response there is now a wealth of empirical evidence
from culture and eld studies to support the use of
d2Halkenone values to reconstruct paleosalinities. Doing so
106
107
108
109