Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 00-1901
ODONNELL v. EIDLEMAN
COUNSEL
ARGUED: Gerald L. Gray, GERALD GRAY LAW FIRM, Clintwood, Virginia, for Appellants. Thomas Samuel Williamson, Jr.,
COVINGTON & BURLING, Washington, D.C., for Appellees. ON
BRIEF: Andrew J. Heimert, COVINGTON & BURLING, Washington, D.C.; Paul R. Thomson, Jr., WOODS, ROGERS & HAZLEGROVE, P.L.C., Roanoke, Virginia, for Appellees.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:
Client Centered Legal Services of Southwest Virginia, Incorporated and Hugh F. ODonnell, its executive director (collectively,
"CCLS"), appeal an order of the district court granting judgment in
favor of the Legal Services Corporation and two of its officers (collectively, "the LSC") on CCLSs claims that various actions by the
LSC exceeded its statutory and regulatory authority. For the reasons
set forth below, we conclude that Congress has not authorized judicial
review of these claims. We therefore vacate and remand with instructions to dismiss.
I.
In 1974, Congress enacted the Legal Service Corporation Act
("LSCA"), which created the LSC for the purpose of providing legal
assistance to indigent people in civil matters. See 42 U.S.C.A. 2996
(West 1994). The LSC does not itself provide legal services, but
rather grants federal funds to legal services programs across the country. CCLS, which provides legal services to indigent people in the
coalfields region of southwestern Virginia, has been an LSC grantee
since 1980.
ODONNELL v. EIDLEMAN
ODONNELL v. EIDLEMAN