Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Inspection Report
Page 1 of 16
to
May 5, 2014
to
May 8, 2014
General Information
Students
School ID
180
Total number of
students
1381
Opening year of
school
1988
Number of children
in KG
168
Principal
Dr Asha Renjith
Number of students
in other phases
Primary:
Middle:
High:
School telephone
Age range
3 years 8 months to 18
years
School Address
Grades or Year
Groups
KG to Grade 12
Official email
(ADEC)
asianintrowais.pvt@adec.ac.ae
Gender
Mixed
School website
www.asianintlschool.com
% of Emirati
Students
0.2%
Low range:
AED 2575 AED 9270
Largest nationality
groups (%)
1. Indian, 86%
2. Egyptian, 3%%
3. Jordanian, 2%
Licensed Curriculum
580 (G1-5)
442 (G6-9)
191 (G10-12)
Staff
Main Curriculum
Number of teachers
90
Other Curriculum
--------
Number of teaching
assistants (TAs)
External Exams/
Standardised tests
Teacher-student
ratio
KG/ FS
1:15
Other phases
1:15
-------
Teacher turnover
19%
Accreditation
Page 2 of 16
Introduction
Inspection activities
Number of inspectors
deployed
Number of inspection
days
Number of lessons
observed
120
Number of parents
questionnaires
Details of other
inspection activities
School Aims
Admission Policy
Leadership structure
(ownership, governance
and management)
Page 3 of 16
Visually impaired
Hearing impaired
Multiple disabilities
SEN Category
Intellectual disability
Specific Learning
Disability
Emotional and Behaviour
Disorders (ED/ BD)
Autism Spectrum
Disorder (ASD)
Speech and Language
Disorders
Physical and health
related disabilities
Number of students
identified
Intellectual ability
33
11
Page 4 of 16
Band B
Satisfactory (Acceptable)
Band C
Weak
In need of significant
improvement
Performance Standard 1:
Students achievement
Performance Standard 2:
Students personal and
social development, and
their innovation skills
Performance Standard 3:
Teaching and assessment
Performance Standard 4:
Curriculum
Performance Standard 5:
The protection, care,
guidance and support of
students
Performance Standard 6:
Leadership and
management
Summary Evaluation:
The schools overall
performance
Page 5 of 16
Very Weak
Satisfactory
Band C
Weak
High Performing
Acceptable
Band B
Good
Band A
Very Good
Performance Standards
BAND (C)
Outstanding
Page 6 of 16
Page 7 of 16
KG
Attainment
N/A
Islamic
Education
Arabic
(as a First Language)
Arabic
(as a Second
Language)
Primary
Middle
High
Weak
Weak
Weak
Progress
N/A
Weak
Weak
Weak
Attainment
N/A
Acceptable
Weak
Weak
Progress
N/A
Acceptable
Weak
Weak
Attainment
N/A
Weak
Weak
Weak
Progress
N/A
Weak
Weak
Weak
Attainment
Good
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Progress
Good
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Attainment
Acceptable
Good
Good
Good
Progress
Good
Good
Good
Good
Attainment
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Weak
Progress
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Weak
Attainment
Good
Good
Good
Good
Progress
Good
Good
Good
Good
Attainment
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Progress
N/A
N/A
N/A
N/A
Attainment
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Progress
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Social Studies
English
Mathematics
Science
Language of
instruction (if other
than English and
Arabic as First
Language)
Other subjects
(Art, Music, PE)
Learning Skills
(including innovation, creativity, critical
thinking, communication, problemsolving and collaboration)
Page 8 of 16
Students achievement is weak in all phases except in KG. This is because, for the large
majority of students, progress is weak and their attainment is below the expected
curriculum levels, particularly in Arabic, Islamic education and UAE social studies.
School leaders were unable to provide credible and robust progress and attainment
data in these areas. Inspectors were therefore required to base their judgements on
lesson observations and scrutiny of students work.
Children arrive in KG with English language skills that are below age expected levels.
They make good progress in English and leave the KG with speaking, writing and
reading skills that are in line with age expectations. They make good progress in
mathematics and science. This is because the thematic curriculum provides them with
opportunities to take part in stimulating problem-solving activities. Children leave the
KG with mathematics and science skills that are above the level expected for their
age.
In the primary and middle schools, attainment and progress in Arabic, Islamic
education and UAE social studies is weak for the large majority of students. In Arabic,
students have too few opportunities to practise speaking and writing skills. In Islamic
education lessons, students have to spend too much time using worksheets and
listening to the teacher. Students make better progress in CBSE social studies lessons
because the teaching is better and gives students opportunities to discuss Indian
culture together. In the majority of UAE social studies lessons seen, students were
disinterested when learning about UAE society and culture. Students make good
progress in English and science. This is because teaching matches the needs and
interests of the students. Progress in mathematics declines as students become older
from that seen in the KG phase because students spend too much time working from
textbooks. They have less opportunity to apply their knowledge to challenging real
world problems.
Students achievement in lessons, in the high school grades remains weak in Arabic
and Islamic education. The few students who completed the Ministry of Education
(MoE) examinations in 2015 attained in line with expectations. Attainment in most of
the CBSE subjects improved in 2015 and was consistently better than for MoE subjects.
Achievement in mathematics fell to below international averages for Grade 10.
Achievement in other subjects is variable. Achievement in Hindi is acceptable and
consistently better than that for Urdu. Achievement in languages is a strength as it
improves in the high school. Business studies is also a strength here. Weaknesses in
the availability of specialist equipment prevent students from making good progress
in ICT. Students make weak progress in the Zero Hour lesson and in physical
education (PE).
Page 9 of 16
The provision to develop students learning skills is better in the KG, and in English and
science subjects. In the KG, children take part excitedly in collaborative learning
activities and enjoy solving simple number problems. In Arabic, Islamic education and
UAE social studies, students learning skills are constrained by an over reliance on the
use of textbooks, worksheets and didactic teaching.
The achievement of SEN students is weak because work is not adapted to meet their
specific learning needs. Boys and girls achieve equally well across the whole school.
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Personal development
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Students know how to stay healthy. A minority do not always bring healthy food to
school to eat. Attendance is now acceptable at 92%. Students arrive at school and
attend their lessons promptly.
A minority of students have responsible roles within the school including participating
in the student council. The involvement of the student council in school improvement
is under developed. Older students act as prefects during break times. Students show
social responsibility. For example, recently, after an earthquake in India, students
collected money and provided relief to help those made homeless. Students also
volunteer to clear local beaches of litter. Students use an innovative waste recycling
system in art lessons and collect newspapers to send to a local recycling company. A
botanical garden built in collaboration with an external organisation, provides
students with the opportunity to acquire knowledge first-hand about plants from
around the world.
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Good
Weak
Weak
Weak
Assessment
Good
Weak
Weak
Weak
Page 11 of 16
In the primary, middle and high schools, teaching is consistently better in science and
English than it is in other subjects. Teachers use problem solving and collaboration to
enthuse students. Teachers in mathematics and other subjects do not provide
enough opportunities for students to work together or to be creative. This slows the
development of students learning skills because they are not developing
independence or self-reliance. Teachers do not give enough attention to the needs of
SEN students in the primary, middle and high schools. As a result, these students do
not make enough progress.
In the primary, middle and high phases of the school, teachers do not question
students effectively. In the majority of lessons, only students who wish to answer
questions are selected to do so. As a result, only a few students benefit from
questions while others become passive listeners.
Assessment processes are a weakness in all areas except the KG. In KG, teachers
collect childrens work in learning journals. They use this evidence to adapt lessons
and provide feedback to parents and children. In the rest of the school, the large
majority of students do not receive sufficient and useful feedback to help them
understand how to improve. Teachers are not using assessment information
effectively to adapt their lesson plans to the needs of students.
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Good
Weak
Weak
Weak
Curriculum adaptation
Good
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Overall, the way the curriculum is designed and how it is being implemented are weak,
except in the KG. ADECs regulations for Arabic, Islamic education and UAE social
studies are not being met. For example, Arabic is short by two lessons per week in
Grades 9, 10, 11 and 12. Long- and medium-term curriculum plans are in place. Leaders
have not ensured that learning proceeds smoothly from grade to grade. For example,
students repeat the same learning in the primary school in UAE social studies.
The curriculum is innovative in the KG. It has been redesigned so that it is now
thematic. The curriculum links together different areas of learning successfully. For
example, children are developing phonics skills when they are learning to recognise
numbers. The KG curriculum supports the delivery of learning skills effectively.
Page 12 of 16
KG
Primary
Middle
High
Health
and
safety,
including
arrangements for child protection/
safeguarding
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
Acceptable
are suitable. Wheelchair users do not have access to some areas of the school site. No
students presently in the school require a wheelchair.
Relationships between staff and students are positive. Students behave well in and
out of lessons. Occasionally a few boys in the primary school lose interest in lessons
and disturb others. A few teachers are not consistently applying the schools
behaviour policies. Attendance has improved since the previous inspection and is now
acceptable. This is largely due to the introduction of a more rigorous system to
challenge non-attendance. Very few students arrive late to school or classes.
Arrangements to identify and support students with SEN are weak and rely too much
on parents to provide a diagnosis from specialists.
The schools routines for monitoring and tracking students academic and personal
development are acceptable. Parents and students receive reports throughout the
year and careers guidance is provided for older students.
Weak
Weak
Acceptable
Weak
Acceptable
Overall, leadership and management are weak. Senior leaders are not delivering the
schools aims and mission to create an outstanding learning community which enables
students to reach their potential to the fullest. Recommendations from the previous
inspection have not been fully achieved. In addition, there are breaches in ADECs
regulations for the implementation of the curriculum and the approval and security
checks for teachers. Subject leaders have been more successful in ensuring that
standards of achievement in the CBSE curriculum have improved. Supervisors have
ensured that the school provides a safe environment in which students can learn.
Attendance has improved and is now acceptable. Facilities and resources are mostly
managed efficiently. Effective leadership in the KG has brought about significant
improvement in its offer to children.
Page 14 of 16
The schools capacity to innovate and improve is weak. This is because self-evaluation
is not accurate or used effectively to drive improvement. Senior leaders and
governors have an over-generous view of provision, especially of the quality of
teaching and implementation of the curriculum. Monitoring procedures are not
robust enough. Governors need to develop more robust approaches to ensure they
have a better grasp of the quality of education provided in their school.
School development plans are not up to date. Leaders are too reliant on the outcomes
from the previous inspection for direction. Senior and middle leaders do not
systemically check that provision meets ADECs requirements. Development plans are
not reviewed regularly to review progress and set new priorities. Senior and middle
leaders are not held sufficiently to account for improvements.
Overall, the impact of professional development is weak. In Arabic, Islamic education
and UAE social studies, subject leaders are not ensuring that teachers are provided
with enough support. New teachers are not adequately supported. Professional
development is having most impact in the KG, English and science where it has led to
improvements in innovation and learning skills.
The provision for students with SEN is not led adequately. The school does not have
an identified senior leader who monitors the quality of provision for or the progress
being made by SEN students.
ADECs parent survey indicates that leaders need to make further efforts to include
parents in school improvement. Overall, parents who responded to the questionnaire
expressed a neutral view. They are more satisfied with the schools arrangements
for health and safety. They are least satisfied with the regularity of communication
from the school and they would like better access to school leaders.
Page 15 of 16
Page 16 of 16