It is an undoubtable fact that group ideology and idea are the most prominent and

substantial part of a group. In this case, there are some analysts who believe that
when two ideas are in war, common man suffer from a group's ideology. I staunchly
agree with the above mentioned statement due to a notable factor.
There is a practical factor which affirms that during the war of ideology, innocent
man always become the victim. Dominance could be a substantial factor. It is
generally seen that in the war of ideas, groups usually in a war to prove dominance
over others thus proclaim themselve as the right one. However, during the process,
many of the innocent lives suffer. For example, terorism over a particular religion or
ideas as proven to produce devastating effect on the country where it happens.
In spite of the reason discussed above, there are some groups who believe that the
suffering is not always the case. Glory could be the most significant factor behind
the opponent view point. It is generally seen that, some group consider the sacrifice
that innocent people made as a glory and they will obtain greater things in the
future. However, it should not also be forgotten that even though it may be true, the
future is still uncertain while the suffering is real. If that is the case, would it be wise
enough to sacrifice something for uncertain things?. My answer would be no.
In the end, indeed, obtaining glory for war of ideas may be true up to some extent.
However, I still believe that common man suffer from a groups ideology.