Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 13-4944
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., District
Judge. (3:12-cr-00040-JFA-2)
Submitted:
THACKER,
Circuit
Judges,
and
DAVIS,
Senior
PER CURIAM:
Carl Quentin Woods pled guilty to two counts of using
a
firearm
during
the
commission
of
crime
of
violence,
in
(2)
whether
Woods
guilty
plea
was
conducted
in
For
the
first
issue,
we
agree
with
Anders
In criminal cases,
days
to
file
notice
of
appeal.
Fed.
R.
App.
P.
4(b)(4); United States v. Reyes, 759 F.2d 351, 353 (4th Cir.
1985).
2013.
November 25, 2013, after both the fourteen-day appeal period and
2
Because
plea
or
otherwise
preserve
any
allegation
of
Rule
11
error, this court reviews his plea colloquy for plain error.
United States v. Martinez, 277 F.3d 517, 525 (4th Cir. 2002).
Our
review
of
the
record
reveals
that
the
district
court
review
sentence
discretion standard.
(2007).
This
review
for
reasonableness
under
an
abuse-of-
consideration
of
both
the
Id.
range,
considered
the
18
U.S.C.
3553(a)
(2012)
United States v. Lynn, 592 F.3d 572, 576 (4th Cir. 2010).
We
United
551
U.S.
338,
34656
(2007)
appellate
find
that
reasonable
the
and
sentence
note
that
is
procedurally
Woods
asked
for
and
substantively
and
received
the
second
or
924(c)(1)(C)(i))
successive
for
Count
924(c)
9,
for
offense
under
discharging
under
924(c)(1)(A)(iii).
In accordance with Anders, we have reviewed the record
in
this
case,
including
the
issues
raised
in
Woods
pro
se
This
of
court
the
right
requires
to
that
petition
counsel
the
inform
Supreme
Woods,
Court
of
in
the
We dispense with
oral
argument
adequately
because
presented
in
the
the
facts
and
materials
legal
before
contentions
this
court
are
and
AFFIRMED