Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 05-4625
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western
District of North Carolina, at Charlotte.
William L. Osteen,
District Judge. (CR-04-210)
Submitted:
Decided:
February 2, 2006
PER CURIAM:
A jury convicted Francisco Romero-Pina of possession of a
firearm
by
identification
prohibited
document
person,
fraud,
in
immigration
violation
of
fraud,
18
U.S.C.
and
The district
Romero-
Finding no
error, we affirm.
Romero-Pina first argues that the district court erred by
denying his suppression motion.
In considering this
See United States v. Perkins, 363 F.3d 317, 320 (4th Cir.
Applying these standards, we find that the district court
211, 217 (4th Cir. 1994) (noting burden of proof concerning plea
agreements). We review the district courts factual determinations
concerning the existence and scope of an alleged immunity agreement
under a clearly erroneous standard, and its application of the law
de novo.
See id.
that the district court did not err in denying this motion.
Romero-Pina also argues that the district court erred by
denying his Second Amendment challenge to 922(g)(5).
We have
We review
F.3d
650,
argument),4
we
651
find
n.1
(4th
that
the
Cir.
2003)
district
(rejecting
court
did
not
similar
err
by
AFFIRMED