Professional Documents
Culture Documents
No. 10-4473
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of North Carolina, at Raleigh.
James C. Fox, Senior
District Judge. (5:07-cr-00102-F-2)
Submitted:
Decided:
PER CURIAM:
In
prior
appeal,
we
affirmed
Cedric
Taylors
(2006).
We
determined,
however,
that
the
Thus, we
On
downward
judgment
courts
of
variance,
acquittal
application
enhancement,
the
the
on
of
courts
courts
the
denial
witness
two-level
finding
that
of
the
motion
for
tampering
count,
the
obstruction
the
of
witnesses
justice
at
the
In his pro se
review
We affirm.
sentences
for
abuse-of-discretion standard.
38,
51
(2007);
United
reasonableness,
applying
an
States
v.
Llamas,
599
F.3d
381,
387
Gall,
defendants
U.S.C.
advisory
3553(a)
presented
selected
by
(2006)
the
for
totality
of
variance
from
factors,
parties,
sentence.
reviewed
Guidelines
552
Gall,
substantive
the
the
and
range,
analyzed
at
51.
reasonableness
Guidelines
any
sufficiently
U.S.
circumstances,
considered
including
range.
arguments
explained
A
18
sentence
the
is
by
examining
the
the
extent
any
Id.;
the
United
of
States
v.
We presume that a
evidence
of
the
defendants
3
rehabilitation
at
drug
conspiracy
involving
violence
and
intimidation.
this
therefore
court
accords
conclude
that
his
within-Guidelines
his
sentence
is
sentence.
We
procedurally
and
substantively reasonable.
Consideration
of
the
remaining
issues
presented
by
When this
64,
addition,
66
(4th
Cir.
1993).
In
the
[mandate]
rule
Id.
Moreover,
We therefore decline to
amended
judgment
counsel.
writing,
and
deny
Taylors
motion
to
appoint
new
the
right
to
petition
the
Supreme
Court
of
the
contentions
the
court
are
adequately
and
argument
presented
would
not
in
aid
the
the
materials
decisional
process.
AFFIRMED