Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: The Eureka Tower project involved the construction of a 300 m high 92-storey tower, the worlds
tallest apartment tower at the time, located in Melbournes Southbank area. An unusual feature of the building
is its slenderness, having a height to base ratio of 6 to 1. The construction of the foundations for the project
proved to be a challenging task.
The geological conditions at the site were complex, highly variable and posed significant construction and
technical difficulties, with two layers of high to very high strength basalt above high strength Silurian Siltstone
bedrock at a depth of approximately 35 m. The ground water table occurred at 2 m depth and the upper and
lower basalt layers were not continuous across the site. To add to the complexity, the loadings imposed on the
foundations by the structure were high. The lower basalt provided a suitable founding medium, provided that
sufficient thickness was available to ensure that settlements of underlying soils were within acceptable limits.
This was difficult to define because of the discontinuous nature of the lower basalt and the variable thickness
of that stratum.
The foundation solution that ultimately proved to be the most cost-effective was a combination of CFA piles
founded on the very high strength lower basalt flow and Bored piles constructed under bentonite drilling fluid
founded in the high strength Siltstone when there was insufficient thickness of the lower basalt. This paper discusses the design and construction aspects of the piled foundations for these challenging conditions, including
the additional site investigation required to define areas appropriate for each pile type; construction of the piles
and the special techniques required to ensure clean bases for the heavily loaded piles; and the testing regime that
comprised Statnamic and Dynamic pile loading tests.
The builder, Grocon, in conjunction with consulting structural engineers Connell Mott MacDonald and
geotechnical consultants Golder Associates, issued
documentation for the tower foundations comprising
bored piles socketed into the strong Silurian bedrock.
Initially the piling work was priced on the conforming solutions utilising bored methods, the equipment
and expertise for which needed to be imported due
to the requirement to penetrate up to 8 m of massive,
very high strength Basalt at up to 1.5 m diameter.
The costs of the conforming solutions considerably
exceeded budget expectations both in terms of cost
and program and the project was at significant risk of
not proceeding.
INTRODUCTION
SITE GEOLOGY
323
Figure 1.
Section DD.
Figure 2.
Section FF.
324
Figure 3.
DESIGN CONSIDERATIONS
CONSTRUCTION ISSUES
Figure 4. Site congestion was a major concern.
4.2
Bored Piles
CFA piles
PILE TESTING
Figure 5.
Coring of basalt.
327
Pile No 6
5.1
Bored piles
Pile No 5
25000
25000
20000
20000
15000
10000
DLT 128kJ
15000
10000
DLT362kJ
Statnamic UPM
5000
5000
Statnamic UPM
0
0
20
30
40
50
0
0
Displacem ent (m m )
Figure 8.
10
20
30
40
50
Displacem ent (m m )
6
5.2
10
CFA piles
CONCLUDING REMARKS
A cost-effective and innovative solution for the foundations for the Eureka Tower project was brought
about by co-operation between consulting structural
and geotechnical engineers and piling contractors
in what were extremely difficult geotechnical conditions. The application of different pile types and
construction techniques was novel and innovative
and resulted in the final cost of the foundations being
reduced by over 30% and the program reduced by
approximately 3 months. The construction was performed in difficult circumstances compounded by the
restricted space available on site. In this manner, the
skills of all parties were utilised, to the benefit of
the project.
REFERENCES
Seidel, J.P. 2000. Rocket 3.0 Manual. Monash University.
Melbourne.
Golder Associates. 2001. Report on geotechnical investigation. Eureka Tower. South Bank. No 01615054.
328