Professional Documents
Culture Documents
JMMF
I. INTRODUCTION
Design of Photovoltaic applications (PVA) is an active
research area in the literature. A very comprehensive review
about this topic can be referred to [1]. The technical
introduction of PVA can be found in [2]. The traditional
methods of power system reliability evaluation are discussed in
[3]. Gordon [4] gave an optimal sizing technique based on the
stochastic process. Egido and Lorenzo [5] presented an early
review and proposed a method to take the advantages from
both numerical and analytic approaches. Markvart et al. [6]
proposed a sizing technique based on the extreme events.
The design of PV applications mainly involves determining
the number of PV plates and the number of batteries in the
application. Most of them only use one day or one years data
to do the design task. However, the fact is that the weather
conditions in a single site in two years will not be the same.
Therefore, the PV applications designed by the traditional way
may fail in the extreme weather conditions.
Extreme Value Theory (EVT) [7, 8] is used in the modeling
of extreme events occurred in a time series. Since the maximal
climate cycle in a year normally cannot be predicted, it is taken
as a random event and can be modeled by EVT. EVT has
various findings that fit different situations. This paper mainly
illustrates the design of PV applications in terms of block
maximum. The realistic data from a real site are employed to
the illustration. A comprehensive version of this approach can
be referred to [9].The remainder of the work is described as
follows: The assumptions for illustrating the approach are
presented in Section 2. The mathematic preliminaries are
addressed in Section 3. The illustration of the proposed method
with realistic data is in Section 4. Finally, Section 5 is the
conclusion.
II. ASSUMPTIONS
To simplify the illustration, it is assumed to satisfy the
following assumptions:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
PRELIMINARIES
M n an
x) H ( x)
bn
x0
0,
Weibull : ( x )
( x)
Gumbel : ( x ) e
x0
x0
x0
0
e
, 0,
, 0,
,xR
(1
x 1/
)
x u
0,
0,
JMMF Vol.1 No.1 2012 PP.6-8 www.sjmmf.org 2012 World Academic Publishing
6
JMMF
B. Calculation of LPPx
LPPx is defined as:
D. Sizing Formulas
LPPx Pr( M n x ) 1 H , , (
).
to do the summation. By
We define a symbol
definition, a climate cycle ci may start from the si percentage of
the PSH at the last day of the previous cycle ci-1 and end at the
(1 - si+1) percentage of the PSH at the last day of this cycle. Let
Tci be the cycle time (i.e., the discharge time) of cycle ci, then it
is expressed as
si e( i 1) R ' 12
ci 24 Tci
e( i 1) R '
(1 si 1 )eiR 12
24( R 1)
eiR
2
1 i Q,
24( R 1) (1 si 1 )ei 12
eiR
2
, i 1.
Td i
R 1 / 2 ei (1 / 2 si 1 ) / 24,
R
i 1.
RTE
Tcmax
T
1)).
For batteries:
VI
L0
RTE
Tcmax
T
1).
JMMF Vol.1 No.1 2012 PP.6-8 www.sjmmf.org 2012 World Academic Publishing
7
JMMF
V. CONCLUSIONS
This paper illustrates the way of how to use the modern
mathematics in the real applications. A novel design method for
PV applications is proposed. Many interesting findings are
obtained, which are never explored before. More realistic
climate data are encouraged for the future verification of this
method.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
The results show that the optimal design is feasible for the
future climates. However, three extremes are discovered by this
method, which would occur at a frequency of per 317.5611,
48.146 and 47.7783 years respectively. These are the evidences
of climate change.
JMMF Vol.1 No.1 2012 PP.6-8 www.sjmmf.org 2012 World Academic Publishing
8