Professional Documents
Culture Documents
org
StatisticalStudiesoftheInhibitionCharacteristics
ofAcidifiedOcimumBasilicumonEngineering
MildSteel
MichaelO.Nwankwo1,PaulA.Nwobasi2,SimeonI.Neife3,NdubuisiE.Idenyi1.
DepartmentofIndustrialPhysics,EbonyiStateUniversity
DepartmentofTechnologyandVocationalEducation,EbonyiStateUniversity
3DepartmentofMetallurgicalandMaterialsEngineering,UniversityofNigeria
1,2Abakaliki,Nigeria;3Nsukka.
1
michaelnwankwo@yahoo.com;awonwobasi@yahoo.com;drneifes@gmail.com;edennaidenyi@yahoo.com
Abstract
A study of the correlation behavior of the inhibition
characteristics of acidified ocimum basilicum on
conventional engineering mild steel has been undertaken.
Weightlosscorrosiontechniquewasemployedtoobtainthe
87.6w
corrosion penetration rate using the equation: cpr
.
At
Subsequently,thequadraticmodelsweredevelopedusinga
computeraidedstatisticalmodelingtechnique(International
Business Machine (IBM)s SPSS version 17.0). The results
obtainedshowedanearlyperfectpositivecorrelationwitha
correlationcoefficientintherangeof0.986R0.996,which
depicts that R is larger than 1. Also, the coefficient of
determination is in the range of 0.972 R2 0.992 showing
that approximately 97% to 99% of the total variation in
passivationrateisaccountedforbycorrespondingvariation
in exposure time, leaving out only between 3% to 1% to
extraneous factors that are not incorporated into the model
equations. The conclusion drawn from this observation is
that the model fit developed from the model equations is
accurate and will be a good predicator of the passivation
behaviourofmildsteelinacidifiedocimiumbasilicum;and
thatroomtemperaturebehaviorofcorrosionprogressioncan
no longer be only logarithmic but now has nonnegligible
quadratic parts. This is a classical departure from longheld
assumptions that corrosion behaviours are only somewhat
logarithmicatroomtemperatures.
Keywords
Corrosion; Inhibition; Ocimum Basilicum; Correlation; Quadratic
Models;Passivation
Introduction
Corrosion can be defined as the environmentally
induced degradation of a material that involves a
chemical reaction (Duquette et al., 2011). Degradation
implies deterioration of physical properties of the
material.Thiscanbeaweakeningofthematerialdue
to a loss of crosssectional area, the shattering of a
metalduetohydrogenembrittlement,orthecracking
ofapolymerduetosunlightexposure.
Most authors insist that the definition of corrosion
shouldberestrictedtometals,butmoreoftenthannot,
corrosion engineers must consider both metals and
nonmetalsforsolutionofagivenproblem.Accordingly,
polymers (plastics, rubbers, etc.), ceramics (concrete,
brick,etc.)orcomposites(mechanicalmixturesoftwo
ormorematerialswithdifferentproperties)andother
nonmetallic materials are generally included as
materialsthatcancorrode(Fontana,2005).
Someofthedeleteriouseffectsofcorrosionareknown
to include among others poor outward appearance of
material surfaces, high maintenance and operating
costs,frequentplantshutdowns,contaminationofend
products, loss of valuable products, hazardous effects
on safety and reliability and burdensome product
liabilities. Consequent upon these, huge financial
losses have always been recorded as resulting from
corrosion damage. For instance, estimates of the
annualcostofcorrosionintheUnitedStatesaloneare
said to be around $276 billion but realistically put at
$30billionasat1998(Fontana,2005).ByMarch2013,it
was evaluated to be $993 billion with a projected
figureof$1trillionbyJune2013(G2MTLab.,2011).
Even with the proper selection of base metals and
welldesigned systems or structures, there is no
absolute way to eliminate all corrosion. Therefore,
corrosion protection methodsareusedto additionally
mitigateandcontroltheeffectsofcorrosion.Corrosion
protection can be in a number of different forms or
strategies with perhaps multiple methods applied in
severe environments. (Craig, Lane & Rose, 2006). The
various forms of corrosion protection include among
others the use of inhibitors, surface treatments,
155
www.mejournal.orgJournalofMetallurgicalEngineering(ME)Volume2Issue4,October2013
156
JournalofMetallurgicalEngineering(ME)Volume2Issue4,October2013www.mejournal.org
Results
TABLE6CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
1.0MH2SO4WITH50cm3OFOCIMUMBASILICUM
Tables16showthecorrosionpenetrationratevalues
obtained from weight loss measurements; while
Figures 16 are the quadratic model fits from
regression analysis of the corrosion penetration rates.
Table 8 is the quadratic model equations obtained
fromtheregressionanalysis.
TABLE1CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
27.71
27.22
26.86
25.19
24.73
18.42
16.85
15.29
12.97
10.63
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
9.29
10.37
11.57
12.22
14.10
0.7635
0.4261
0.3170
0.2318
0.2511
0.5MH2SO4
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
26.76
26.34
26.87
26.51
27.01
20.46
19.59
19.77
19.00
15.93
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
6.30
6.75
7.10
7.51
11.11
0.5178
0.2774
0.1945
0.1543
0.1826
TABLE2CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
0.5MH2SO4WITH25cm3OFOCIMUMBASILICUM
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
25.14
28.82
28.36
27.61
26.90
19.04
22.29
21.80
20.67
17.80
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
6.10
6.53
6.56
6.94
9.10
0.5013
0.2683
0.1767
0.1422
0.1596
FIG.1QUADRATICMODELFITFOR0.5MH2SO4ONLY.
TABLE3CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
0.5MH2SO4WITH50cm3OFOCIMUMBASILICUM
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
28.02
27.24
27.93
27.41
27.38
22.46
21.05
21.63
20.36
17.38
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
5.56
6.19
6.30
7.08
10.00
0.4560
0.2544
0.1745
0.1444
0.1454
TABLE4CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
1.0MH2SO4
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
25.70
25.64
25.50
24.47
26.63
14.84
12.69
12.35
9.82
10.63
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
10.86
12.95
13.15
14.65
16.00
0.8926
0.5322
0.3603
0.2900
0.2630
FIG.2QUADRATICMODELFITFOR0.5MH2SO4WITH25cm3
OCIMUMBASILICUM.
TABLE5CORROSIONPENETRATIONRATESOFMILDSTEELSAMPLEIN
1.0MH2SO4WITH25cm3OFOCIMUMBASILICUM
Exposure
Initial
Final
time(hrs) weight(g) weight(g)
144
288
432
576
720
26.58
26.40
26.81
24.80
25.10
17.03
16.36
15.53
12.69
6.08
Weight
loss(g)
Corrosionrate
(mm/yr)
9.55
10.04
11.28
12.11
17.02
0.7849
0.4126
0.3090
0.2488
0.2305
FIG.3QUADRATICMODELFITFOR0.5MH2SO4WITH50cm3
OCIMUMBASILICUM.
157
www.mejournal.orgJournalofMetallurgicalEngineering(ME)Volume2Issue4,October2013
Discussion
FIG.4QUADRATICMODELFITFOR1.0MH2SO4ONLY
FIG.5QUADRATICMODELFITFOR1.0MH2SO4WITH25cm3
OCIMUMBASILICUM.
FIG.6QUADRATICMODELFITFOR1.0MH2SO4WITH50cm3
OCIMUMBASILICUM.
TABLE7MODELEQUATIONSOFTHEVARIOUSQUADRATICFITS
Corrosionmedium
158
Modelequations
0.5MH2SO4only
0.5MH2SO4+25cm3ocimumbasilicum
0.5MH2SO4+50cm3ocimumbasilicum
1.0MH2SO4only
1.0MH2SO4+25cm ocimumbasilicum
1.0MH2SO4+50cm3ocimumbasilicum
JournalofMetallurgicalEngineering(ME)Volume2Issue4,October2013www.mejournal.org
TABLE8MODELPARAMETERS
CorrosionMedium
0.5MH2SO4
0.5MH2SO4+25cm3Ocimumbasilicum
0.5MH2SO4+50cm3Ocimumbasilicum
1.0MH2SO4
1.0MH2SO4+25cm3Ocimumbasilicum
1.0MH2SO4+50cm3Ocimumbasilicum
Parameters
R
AdjustedR2
StandardErrorofEstimation
0.994
0.995
0.994
0.996
0.986
0.993
0.988
0.990
0.988
0.992
0.972
0.986
0.976
0.980
0.975
0.984
0.944
0.972
0.023
0.021
0.021
0.033
0.054
0.037
ModelSummary
Conclusion
ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The authors wish to acknowledge the Department of
Industrial Chemistry of Ebonyi State University for
grantingthemthepermissiontousetheirfacilitiesfor
thework.
REFERENCES
Abiola,O.K.,Okafor,N.C.,Ebenso,E.E.&Nwinuka,
N. M. (2007). Ecofriendly corrosion inhibitors: The
inhibitive actions of delonix regia extract for
corrosion
of
aluminum
in
acidic
media.
AnticorrosionMethodsandMaterials,54(4)219224.
AshassiSorkhabi, H., Shabani, B., Aligholipour, B. &
Seifzadeh,D.(2006).TheeffectofsomeSchiffbases
onthecorrosionofaluminuminhydrochloricacid
solution. Applied Surface Sciences, 252 (12) 4039
4047.
Boxer, A. & Back, P. (1980). The herb book. London:
OctopusBooksLtd.
Craig,B.D.,Lane,R.A.&Rose,D.H.(2006).Corrosion
prevention and control: A program management guide
forselectingmaterials. NewYork: AlionScienceand
Technology.
Duke, J. A. (1985). Culinary herbs: A potpourri. New
York:BouchMagazineLtd.
159
www.mejournal.orgJournalofMetallurgicalEngineering(ME)Volume2Issue4,October2013
Sciences.
Ekuma,C.E.&Idenyi,N.E.(2007).Statisticalanalysis
of the influence of environment on prediction of
corrosion from its parameters. Research Journal of
Physics,USA.1(1)2734.
solution.OpenJournalofMetals,USA,26873.
Muenscher,W.C.&Rice,M.A.(1978).Gardenspiceand
wildpotherbs.NewYork:CornellUniversityPress.
Nwoye, C. I., Idenyi, N. E. & Odo, J. U. (2012).
JournalofChemicalEngineeringandMaterialsScience,
MaterialsScienceandEngineering,3(1)814.
USA,1(1)17.
Fontana,M.G.(2005).Corrosionengineering.NewDelhi:
TataMcGrawHillPublishingCompanyLtd.
Ijomah, M. C. N. (1991). Elements of corrosion and
protection theory. Enugu: AutoCentury Publishing
CompanyLtd.
Kumpawat, N., Chaturvedi, A. & Upadhyay, R. K.
(2010). Comparative study of corrosion inhibition
efficiency of stem and leaves extract of ocimum
sanctum(holybasil)formildsteelinHClsolution.
ProtectionofMetalsandPhysicalChemistryofSurfaces,
46(2)267270.
160
Oguzie,E.E.(2006).Studiesontheinhibitiveeffectsof
ocimum viridis extracts on the acid corrosion of
mild steel. MaterialsChemistryandPhysics, 99 (23),
441445.
Oguzie,E.E.,Onuchukwu,P.C.,&Ebenso,E.E.(2006).
Corrosion inhibition and adsorption behaviour of
ocimum basilicum extracts on aluminum. Pigment
andResinTechnology,35(2),6370.
Soule,J.A.(2011).Fatherkinosherbs:Growingandusing
them.Arizona:TierradelsolInstitutePress.
Stobart,T.(1982).Herbs,spicesandflavorings.NewYork:
TheOverbookPress.