Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Institute of Environment & Sustainable Development, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
Department of Mycology & Plant Pathology, Institute of Agricultural Sciences, Banaras Hindu University, Varanasi 221005, India
a r t i c l e i n f o
a b s t r a c t
Article history:
Received 28 March 2015
Received in revised form
20 December 2015
Accepted 21 December 2015
Available online 8 January 2016
Large scale exploitation of rhizospheric interactions is essential for enhancing the agroecosystems
resilience to climate change and also for adopting inventive adaptation strategies for maximizing the
food production under such adverse conditions. Successful exploitation of rhizospheric interactions can
be used for improving the soil fertility and organic carbon pool while minimizing the trace gases
emission from agrosystems. Most importantly, such knowledge can be used to enhance the plantmicrobe interactions, conferring diseases resistance to host plants, bioremediation and restoration of
marginal and degraded lands. However, recent studies proved that changing climatic conditions can alter
the rhizosphere biology by modifying the root exudation rate, resource availability and biogeochemical
cycling. Therefore, strategic and applied researches are essential to explore the rhizosphere biology
under changing climatic conditions and harnessing all benecial interactions as a low-input biotechnology for sustainable agriculture, ecosystem restoration and environmental sustainability.
2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
Keywords:
Rhizosphere biology
Climate change
Plant-microbe interactions
Sustainable agriculture
1. Introductory note
Plant-microbe interactions play a major role in sustainable crop
production including conferring disease resistance to crop plants
against a wide range of pathogenic organisms (Coninck et al., 2015)
through their specialized and customized chemical secretions
(Gourion et al., 2015; Bonfante and Genre, 2015). While their
defence strategies are at par with the arm and ammunition strategies of the modern world, there is a growing concern that climate
change (mainly due to elevated carbon dioxide (e-CO2) and temperature) can weaken the plant-microbe defence partnership
mainly by disrupting their chemical communication network
(A'Bear et al., 2014). Moreover, the increasing soil pollution due to
toxic chemicals is an additional threat to the chemical signalling of
plants and their associated microbiome. Though such communications error can cause a drastic impact on our biodiversity,
elemental and hydrological cycling and even global agricultural
production itself (Singh, 2015; Niles et al., 2015), still there are
many known unknowns and unknown knowns regarding plantmicrobe partnerships under adverse conditions. Therefore, the
present note is aimed to highlight the importance of harnessing
plant-microbe interactions for agricultural sustainability and the
impact of changing climatic conditions on plant adaptations and
interactions with pathogens, parasites, mutualists and chemical
pollutants.
2. Plant-soil-microbe and climate nexus
Maximizing the food production for a rapidly growing population is one of the immediate sustainability challenges of the 21st
century (Pretty, 2008; Dubey et al., 2016). Therefore, one of the
important arenas of harnessing plant-microbe partnership for human wellbeing is sustainable food production. However, the
changing climate can alter the phenology, reproduction, owering,
anthesis, pollen viability, pollination, seed lling duration, seed
setting, seed size, seed quality and yield of agricultural crops (Singh
et al., 2013). The warming climate and e-CO2 are found to lengthen
the growing season in plants (Reyes-Fox et al., 2014). Such
phenological shift can cause a great mismatch between plant and
insect pollinator population. Consequently, changes in interspecic
relationship of plants with its competitors, predators, parasites,
363
364
Fig. 1. (A). Multiple stresses in plants under changing conditions and (B) signalling cascade in plants in response to multiple stresses (adapted from Prasch and Sonnewald (2014)).
Though the elevated CO2 is believed to have a fertilisation effect on plants, the increase in abiotic stress factors like temperature, drought, ozone, salinity will negatively affect the
plant health. According to Prasch and Sonnewald (2014), two protein kinase signalling complexes viz. Target of Rapamycin (TOR)-1 and Sucrose-non-fermenting-1 related protein
kinase (SnRK1) will balance the interplay between growth and stress response of plants. SnRK1 will be activated under the stress condition and will slow down the growth process
by activating the abscisic acid response element binding proteins (AREBPs). Moreover, the stress responsive hormones may trigger the downstream signalling cascade using
mitogen-activated protein kinases (MAPKs), Snf1-related kinases (SnRKs) and Ca2-dependent protein kinase (CPKs) cascades, which in turn initiate a reversible chain of protein
phosphorylation events. These signal transduction pathways lead to the activation of well-characterized proteins involved in biosynthesis of proteases, transporters, and chaperones
as well as osmoprotectants and detoxication enzymes. However, TOR-1 will be activated under the high nutritional condition to support the plant growth. These transcriptomic
changes show the regulation of novel genes affecting the synthesis of proteins and metabolites leading to change in photosynthesis, carbon metabolism, growth, amino acids,
sugars, starch synthesis and other metabolic processes. However, there is still a signicant knowledge gap regarding plant molecular responses to climate change catastrophes.
Though we are moving towards to answer most of these questions through the latest developments in omic technologies; still we are far behind from having a comprehensive
knowledge of the diverse molecular responses of plant tness to changing climate. (Figure drawn by Sheikh Adil Edrisi).
365
soil N processing and stabilization in organo-mineral fractions. Soil Biol. Biochem. 68, 241e251.
Coninck, B.D., Timmermans, P., Vos, C., Cammue, B.P.A., Kazan, K., 2015. What lies
beneath: belowground defense strategies in plants? Trends Plant Sci. 20,
91e101.
DaMatta, F.M., Grandis, A., Arenque, B.C., Marcos, S., Buckeridge, M.S., 2010. Impacts
of climate changes on crop physiology and food quality. Food Res. Int. 43,
1814e1823.
Dubey, P.K., Singh, G.S., Abhilash, P.C., 2016. Agriculture in a changing climate.
J. Clean. Product. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.11.067.
Eastburn, D.M., McElrone, A.J., Bilgin, D.D., 2011. Inuence of atmospheric and climatic change on plantepathogen interactions. Plant Pathol. 60, 54e69.
Gourion, B., Berrabah, F., Pascal Ratet, P., Stacey, G., 2015. Rhizobiumelegume
symbioses: the crucial role of plant immunity. Trends Plant Sci. 20, 186e194.
Kabubo-Mariara, J., Karanja, F.K., 2007. The economic impact of climate change on
Kenyan crop agriculture: a Ricardian approach. Glob. Planeta Change 57,
319e330.
Lobell, D.B., Gourdji, S.M., 2012. The inuence of climate change on global crop
productivity. Plant Physiol. 160, 1686e1697.
Lobell, D.B., Hammer, G.L., McLean, G., Messina, C., Roberts, M.J., Schlenker, W., 2013.
The critical role of extreme heat for maize production in the United States. Nat.
Clima. Change 3, 497e501.
Mitter, B., Brader, G., Afzal, M., Compant, S., Naveed, M., Trognitz, F., Sessitsch, A.,
2013. Advances in elucidating benecial interactions between plants, soil, and
bacteria. Adv. Agron. 121, 381e445.
Nelson, G.C., Rosegrant, M.W., Koo, J., Robertson, R., Sulser, T., Zhu, T., Ringler, C.,
Msangi, S., Palazzo, A., Batka, M., Magalhaes, M., Valmonte-Santos, R., Ewing, M.,
Lee, D., 2009. Food Policy Report. Climate Change: Impact on Agriculture and
Costs of Adaptation, pp. 1e19.
Niero, M., Ingvordsen, C.H., Jrgensen, R.B., Hauschild, M.Z., 2015. How to manage
uncertainty in future LCA scenarios addressing the effect of climate change in
crop
production.
J.
Clean.
Product.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.jclepro.2015.05.061.
Niles, M.T., Lubell, M., Brown, M., 2015. How limiting factors drive agricultural
adaptation to climate change. Agri. Eco. Environ. 200, 178e185.
Philippot, L., Hallin, S., 2011. Towards food, feed and energy crops mitigating climate
change. Trends Plant Sci. 16, 476e480.
Philippot, L., Raaijmakers, J.M., Lemanceau, P., van der Putten, W.H., 2013. Going
back to the roots: the microbial ecology of the rhizosphere. Nat. Rev. Microbiol.
11, 789e799.
Pretty, J., 2008. Agricultural sustainability: concepts, principles and evidence.
Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 363, 447e465.
Prasch, C.M., Sonnewald, U., 2014. Signalling events in plants: stress factors in
combination change the picture. Environ. Exp. Bot. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/
j.envexpbot.2014.06.020.
Ramos-Solano, B., Algar, E., Gutierrez-Manero, F.J., Bonilla, A., Lucas, J.A., GarcaSeco, D., 2015. Bacterial bioeffectors delay postharvest fungal growth and
modify total phenolics, avonoids and anthocyanins in blackberries. LWT e
Food Sci. Technol. 61, 437e443.
Reyes-Fox, M., Steltzer, H., Trlica, M.J., McMaster, G.S., Andales, A.A., LeCain, D.R.,
Morgan, J.A., 2014. Elevated CO2 further lengthens growing season under
warming conditions. Nature 510, 259e262.
Saleem, M., Luke, A., Moe, L.A., 2014. Multitrophic microbial interactions for ecoand agro-biotechnological processes: theory and practice. Trends Biotechnol.
32, 529e537.
r, H., Fischer, W., Hake, J., 2015. The system boundaries of sustainability.
Schlo
J. Clean. Prod. 88, 52e60.
Singh, J.S., 2015. Microbes: the chief ecological engineers in reinstating equilibrium
in degraded ecosystems. Agri. Eco. Environ. 203, 80e82.
Singh, R.P., Prasad, P.V.V., Reddy, K.R., 2013. Impacts of changing climate and climate
variability on seed production and seed industry. Adv. Agron. 118, 49e110.
Song, X., Liu, M., Wu, D., Grifths, B.S., Jiao, J., Li, H., Hu, F., 2015. Interaction matters:
synergy between vermicompost and PGPR agents improves soil quality, crop
quality and crop yield in the eld. Appl. Soil Ecol. 89, 25e34.
Tripathi, V., Abhilash, P.C., Singh, H.B., Singh, N., Patra, D.D., 2015. Effect of temperature variation on lindane dissipation and microbial activity in soils. Ecol.
Eng. 79, 54e59.
Vellend, M., 2010. Conceptual synthesis in community ecology. Q. Rev. Biol. 85,
183e206.
Weyens, N., van der Lelie, D., Taghavi, S., Newman, L., Vangronsveld, J., 2009.
Exploiting plantemicrobe partnerships to improve biomass production and
remediation. Trends Biotechnol. 27, 591e598.