Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E 13-14
2011
Total revenue..........................................
2010
AMOUNT
PERCENT
$403,000
$430,000
$(27,000)
(6.3)%
$188,000
$202,000
$(14,000)
(6.9)
expenses....................................
93,000
90,000
3,000
3.3
Interest expense.................................
4,000
10,000
(6,000)
(60.0)
expense......................................
37,000
42,000
(5,000)
(11.9)
Total expenses...................................
322,000
344,000
(22,000)
(6.4)
Net income..............................................
$ 81,000
$ 86,000
$ (5,000)
(5.8)
Expenses:
Cost of goods sold.
Selling and general
Income tax
897
(10-15 min.)
E 13-16
PERCENT
ASSETS
Total current assets.............................................................................
$ 92,000
24.6%
247,000
66.0
Other assets........................................................................................
35,000
9.4
Total assets.........................................................................................
$374,000
100.0%
$ 48,000
12.8%
Long-term debt....................................................................................
108,000
28.9
Total liabilities......................................................................................
156,000
41.7
218,000
58.3
$374,000
100.0%
LIABILITIES
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY
Total shareholders equity....................................................................
Total liabilities and shareholders equity
898
(10-15 min.)
E 13-17
2010
100.0%
100.0%
46.6
47.0
23.1
20.9
Interest expense...................................................................................
1.0
2.3
9.2
9.8
Total expenses.....................................................................................
79.9
80.0
20.1%
20.0%
Expenses:
Net income................................................................................................
(10-15 min.)
E 13-18
1. Operations provided very little cash. The company is selling property, plant, and equipment to generate
cash.
2. Selling property, plant, and equipment and purchasing no new property, plant, and equipment suggests
financial weakness.
3. Holland Marsh Farms paid dividends equal to its net income. The business cant grow by paying such
high dividends.
899
(10-15 min.)
E 13-21
(Dollars in thousands)
a. Return on net sales:
2011:
$17,000
$174,000
0.098
2010:
$13,000
$158,000
= 0.082
_____
$17,000 + $9,000
$197,500*
= 0.132
2010:
_____
$13,000 + $10,000
$181,000**
= 0.127
c.
$17,000 $3,000
$92,500***
= 0.151
_____
2010:
$13,000 $3,000
$84,000****
= 0.119
$13,000 $3,000
20,000
= $0.50
_____
$17,000 $3,000
21,000
= $0.67
2010:
The companys operating performance improved during 2011. All four profitability measures increased.
900
Problems
Group A
P 13-39A
Comairs statement of cash flows reveals only one strong point, a continuing purchase of property, plant, and
equipment. The companys weaknesses include the following:
1. Net income is down significantly, with the company incurring a net loss during 2011.
2. Operating activities provided a much smaller proportion of cash in 2011 than in 2010. In both years,
borrowing not operations was the primary source of cash inflows, which is an unfavourable signal
about the company.
3. The large payments on notes payable suggest that the company has a lot of debt. Coupled with the loss
during 2011 and the decrease in net cash provided by operations, the payments on notes payable may
indicate that the company has too much debt.
4. Purchases of property, plant, and equipment were down significantly from the previous year.
5. The companys cash balance decreased by $83,000 during 2011 to $9,000, which is dangerously low.
Jetways statement of cash flows reveals the following strengths (no significant weaknesses):
1. During both years, operating activities were the major source of cash.
2. The companys heavy investments in property, plant, and equipment suggest expansion. The use of cash,
coupled with increasing income and net cash provided by operations, suggests successful operations.
3. The cash balance is much higher than that of the other company and is increasing.
Conclusion:
Jetway appears to be the strongest company and thus the best investment.
901
(40-50 min.)
P 13-41A
Req. 1
(Dollar Amounts and Share Quantities in Thousands)
2011
a. Current ratio:
b. Inventory turnover:
c. Times-interestearned ratio:
$402
$286
$378
($152 + $186) / 2
$160
$37
2010
= 1.41
= 2.24
= 4.32
$397
$217
$313
($186 + $144) / 2
$139
$41
= 1.83
= 1.90
= 3.39
d. Return on assets:
$79 + $37
($689 + $653) / 2
= 0.173
$55 + $41
($653 + $607) / 2
= 0.152
e. Return on
$79 $21
($208 + $201) / 2
= 0.377
$55 $21
($201 + $198) / 2
= 0.266
g. Price/earnings
ratio:
$79 $21
15
$61*
$5.13*
= $5.13*
= 11.9
$55 $21
14
$45.50*
$3.79*
= $3.79*
= 12.0
_____
*Not in thousands.
1
Req. 2
Decisions:
a. The companys financial position improved during 2011 as shown by increases in the inventory turnover
and in the times-interest-earned ratio. Of all the ratios, only the current ratio deteriorated.
902
b. The common shares attractiveness increased during 2011, as shown by the increase in the market price
of the common shares. This increase is consistent with the increase in return on assets, return on
common shareholders equity, and earnings per share. The price/earnings ratio is essentially unchanged.
Req. 3
This problem gives you practice in computing and evaluating several of the ratios used in investment analysis.
By analyzing the two-year trends in the ratios, you can see whether the companys abilities to pay its debts,
sell its inventory, and generate profits have improved or deteriorated during this period. Improving ratio values
generally indicate an attractive investment, and deteriorating ratio values usually signal an unattractive
investment.
Increase/
(Decrease)
2011
2010
Amount
Net Sales
667,000
599,000
68,000
COGS
378,000
313,000
65,000
Gross Profit
289,000
286,000
3,000
Operating exp
129,000
147,000
(18,000)
160,000
139,000
21,000
Interest expense
37,000
41,000
(4,000)
123,000
98,000
25,000
44,000
43,000
1,000
Net Income
79,000
55,000
24,000
Perc
ent
11.4
%
20.8
%
1.0%
12.2
%
15.1
%
-9.8%
25.5
%
2.3%
43.6
%
903
2011
667,000
378,000
289,000
129,000
160,000
37,000
123,000
44,000
79,000
2010
599,000
313,000
286,000
147,000
139,000
41,000
98,000
43,000
55,000
2011
100%
57%
43%
19%
24%
6%
18%
7%
12%
2010
100%
52%
48%
25%
23%
7%
16%
7%
9%
Accounts
receivable
turnover
Days's sales in
receivables
Net Sales
Average net accounts
receivable
Average net accounts
receivable
One day's sales
2010
245
286
0.86
191
217
0.88
667
3.72
599
4.15
179.5
144.5
179.5
1.8273
97
98.23
144.5
1.6410
96
88.05
Debt ratio
Total liabilities
Total assets
431
689
0.63
402
653
0.62
Return on sales
Net income
Net sales
79
667
11.8%
55
599
9.2%
904
(45-60 min.)
P 13-42A
Req. 1
(Dollar Amounts and Share Quantities in Thousands)
Express
Video
a. Acid-test ratio:
$25 + $6 + $189
$366
b. Inventory
turnover:
c. Days sales
in average
$454
($211 + $209) / 2
($189 + $142) / 2
$603 / 365
= 0.60
$338
$387
= 2.16
($183 + $197) / 2
($164 + $193) / 2
= 100
$519 / 365
0.64
2.04
126
0.74
receivables:
d. Debt ratio:
$667
$974
$691
$938
= 0.68
Note: Students need to recognize that debt ratio is calculated on Total Liabilities/Total Assets and the proportion of Long-Term Debt to
Total Liabilities is not important.
e. Times-interestearned ratio:
$72
$12
=
6.00
no interest expense.
f. Return on common
shareholders'
equity:
$56
$38
=
share:
h. Price/earnings
ratio:
$56
150
$9.00*
$0.37*
$4.00
250
1,000
0.196
($307 + $263) / 2
g. Earnings per
)=
0.180
[($247 $25) +
($215 $25)] / 2
$38
=
$0.37*
= 24.3
$4.00
250
1,000
)=
$1.85*
20
$47.50*
$1.85*
= 25.7
_____
*Not in thousands.
Decision:
905
The common shares of Video.com seem to fit the investment strategy better. Videos price/earnings ratio is a little lower
than that of On-Line Express, and Video appears to be in slightly better shape financially than Express. On several of the
ratios, the two companies are relatively close. The ratios that tip the decision in favour of Video are days sales in
receivables, the debt ratio, and the return on common shareholders equity.
906
(15-20 min.)
TO:
FROM:
Student Name
P 13-43A
907
Problems
Group B
Pathfinder Inc.
Common-Size Income Statement Compared
to Industry Average
For the Year Ended December 31, 2011
PATH-FINDER INDUSTRY
AVERAGE
Net sales................................................................................
100.0%
100.0%
71.0
65.8
Gross profit.............................................................................
29.0
34.2
Operating expenses...............................................................
23.3
19.7
Operating income...................................................................
5.7
14.5
Other expenses......................................................................
0.4
0.4
Net income.............................................................................
5.3%
Pathfinder Inc.
Common-Size Balance Sheet Compared to Industry Average
December 31, 2011
PATH-FINDER
14.1%
INDUSTRY
AVERAGE
Current assets...........................................................................
75.0%
70.9%
18.5
23.6
1.0
0.8
Other assets..............................................................................
5.5
4.7
Total assets...............................................................................
100.0%
100.0%
Current liabilities........................................................................
51.5%
48.1%
Long-term liabilities...................................................................
16.0
16.6
Shareholders equity..................................................................
32.5
35.3
100.0%
100.0%
908
Pathfinders common-size income statement shows that its ratios of (a) gross profit to net sales, (b)
operating income to net sales, and (c) net income to net sales are worse than the industry
averages. Overall, the companys profit performance is worse than the average for the industry.
Req. 3
Pathfinders common-size balance sheet shows that its (a) ratio of current assets to total assets
exceeds that of the industry average. Pathfinders (b) ratio of shareholders equity to total assets is
worse than the industry average. Overall, the companys financial position is worse than the industry
average.
(20-30 min.) P 13-46B
Norfolks statement of cash flows reveals few strengths. About the only bright spot is that cash
increased. The companys weaknesses include the following:
1. Net Income and cash provided by operations are down significantly.
2. Operating activities provided less cash than selling property, plant, and equipment during both
years. This shows that operations are not the prime source of cash inflow. Selling property,
plant, and equipment as the major source of cash can be a sign of trouble.
3. The company is not investing much in new property, plant, and equipment. This is not
necessarily a weakness, for the company may have acquired property, plant, and equipment in
earlier years and may now be paying the debts incurred to purchase those assets. However, the
companys downward trends of income and net cash flow from operations suggest that its
operations are not very successful.
4. Payments on debt are high. This, coupled with the decrease in income, indicates that the debt
burden may have hurt the company.
Stafford Crystals statement of cash flows reveals the following strengths (no significant
weaknesses):
Chapter 13 Financial Statement Analysis
Copyright 2012 Pearson Canada Inc.
909
1. During both years, operating activities generated the bulk of the companys cash. Furthermore,
the trend of net income is up, a favourable sign.
2. The company is steadily increasing its investments in property, plant, and equipment, which
suggests the company is expanding. This investing activity, coupled with increasing income and
increasing net cash flow from operating activities, suggests successful operations.
3. The cash balance is higher than that of the other company, and cash increased during the
current year.
Conclusion: Stafford Crystal appears to be the strongest
company and thus the best investment.
910
(40-50 min.)
P 13-48B
Req. 1
(Dollar Amounts and Share Quantities in Thousands)
2011
a. Current ratio:
b. Inventory
turnover:
c. Times-interestearned ratio:
d. Return on
common shareholders' equity:
e. Earnings per share:
f.
Price/earnings
ratio:
$421
$206
$429
($147 + $162) / 2
2010
= 2.04
$382
$223
= 1.71
= 2.78
$318
($162 + $207) / 2
= 1.72
= 10.8
$75
$8
= 9.4
$58 $6
($210 + $120) / 2
= 0.315
$40 $6
($120 + $90) / 2
$58 $6
10
= $5.20*
$40 $6
9
= $3.78*
= 16
$62.50*
$3.78*
= 16.5
$97
$9
$83*
$5.20*
= 0.324
____
*Not in thousands.
Req. 2
Decisions:
a. The companys financial position improved during 2011, as shown by increases in the current ratio,
inventory turnover, and times-interest-earned ratio.
b. The common shares attractiveness improved a little during 2011, as shown by the rise in the share
market price. This increase in market price is consistent with the increase in earnings per share. Return
on common shareholders equity is high.
Req. 3
This problem gives you practice in computing and evaluating several of the ratios used in investment analysis.
By analyzing the two-year trends in the ratios, you can see whether the companys abilities to pay its debts,
sell its inventory, and generate profits have improved or deteriorated during this period. Improving ratio values
Chapter 13 Financial Statement Analysis
Copyright 2012 Pearson Canada Inc.
911
generally indicate an attractive investment, and deteriorating ratio values usually signal an unattractive
investment.
912
(45-60 min.)
P 13-49B
Req. 1
(Dollar Amounts and Share Quantities in Thousands)
a. Acid-test ratio:
Thrifty Nickel
$22 + $20 + $42
= 0.78
$108
b. Inventory
turnover:
$209
($87 + $93) / 2
2.32
$258
($100 + $88) / 2
= 2.74
c. Days sales in
average
receivables:
($42 + $40) / 2
$371 / 365
40
($46 + $48) / 2
$497 / 365
= 35
d. Debt ratio:
$108
$265
Village Cryer
$19 + $18 + $46
$98
$131
$328
= 0.41
= 0.85
= 0.40
Note: Students need to recognize that debt ratio is calculated on Total Liabilities/Total Assets and the proportion of LongTerm Debt to Total Liabilities is not important.
e. Times-interestearned ratio:
$138
$19
f. Return on common
shareholders'
equity:
$48
($157 + $118) / 2
$48
10
$51.00*
$4.80*
0.349
200
$72
1000
( $5
[($197 $20) +
($126 $20)] / 2
200
$72
= $4.80*
= 10.6
= 7.26
( $5
1000
= 0.502
= $14.20*
5
$112.00*
$14.20*
= 7.9
Decision:
Village Cryers common shares seem to fit the investment strategy better. Its price/earnings ratio is lower than
that of Thrifty Nickel, and Village Cryer appears to be in better shape financially than Thrifty Nickel, as
indicated by all the ratio values.
913
914