Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Rea:
The guilty mind
Refers to a persons intention to commit a crime
Level of legal liability
Occur when the prosecution must only prove that an illegal act was
done (actus reus); that is, no mens rea must be proven
E.g. traffic offences, graffiti offence of holding a spray can
Summary offences dealt in the Local Court
Causation
The link between the actions of the accused and the harm cause by
it
The behaviour of the accused must be at least the substantial
cause of the crime i.e. there must be a link between what the
accused did and the injury that was caused
Examples:
R V Blaue- the refusal of the victim to accept reasonable treatment
on religious grounds
R V Hallet expected natural forces like sea tides
Categories of Crime
Drug Offence:
Involves prohibited or restricted drugs
Include cultivation, importation, manufacture,
distribution/trafficking, and possession
The Drug Misuse and Trafficking Act 1985 (NSW)
Offences against the person:
Acts or omissions that harm or cause injury to an individual
Crimes Act 1900 (NSW) and Crimes Act 1914 (Commonwealth)
The three broad categories are:
1. Homicide:
The unlawful killing of a person.
Murder: the deliberate killing of another person/set out to inflict
bodily harm resulting in death and was done with reckless
indifference to human life.
Manslaughter: when it can be proven that the defendant did not
intend to kill someone. It is less intentional than murder.
Infanticide: the death of a baby under the age of 12 months at
the hand of its mother. Mitigating circumstances include postnatal depression
Death by reckless driving: when a person is driving in an unsafe,
reckless and negligent manner
2. Assault:
Threatened or direct application of force, violence or injury upon
a person
Embezzlement
Tax evasion
Insider trading
3. COMPUTER OFFENCES:
Computer based offences such as identity theft, hacking
Driving Offence:
They only require the police to show that the offender committed
the act; they do not need to consider the individuals intention or
state of mind
Offence against the sovereign:
Aim to disrupt or harm the governing bodies of a country
Sedition: promoting discontent, hatred or contempt against the
government or leader of the state
Treason: an attempt to manifest attention to levy war against the
state, assist the enemy etc.
Summary and indictable offences
Summary: less severe offense that are heard and sentenced by a
magistrate in the local court. E.g. swearing in public, larceny
Indictable: more serious offences that are heard and sentenced by a
judge or jury in the District or Supreme Court. An initial committal
hearing will be held in the Local Court. E.g. assault, homicide, tax
evasion
Parties to a crime
Principal in the first degree: the person who actually carries out the
criminal act and is the principal offender of the crime. They are
directly responsible and referred to as the perpetrator. If found
guilty, receive harshest penalties
Principal in the second degree: the person is present during the
actual crime and assists the principal in the first degree to commit
the crime. Given a lighter sentence and are referred to as the
accomplice or accessory
Accessory before the fact: helps others plan or prepare the criminal
act and are not present at the time the crime is conducted
Accessory after the fact: helps criminals after they have committed
the crime and are not however, present during the crime. They are
given the lesser punishment.
Factors affecting criminal behaviour
Psychological: forms of mental illness can lead to criminal behaviour
Reporting Crime:
Police rely on members of the public to report crimes
Many crimes go un-reported e.g. domestic violence and sexual
assault
Unreported because fear of consequences, personal affection
towards offender, dont want to be a witness, trivial matter
Victims and witnesses use discretion when deciding to report
a crime, not all crimes will be solved and offenders will go
unpunished
Investigating Crime:
Police investigate most crimes, but it is left to their discretion
as to whether or not the crime warrants investigation
Tools: interviews, forensic science and surveillance
Gathering Evidence:
Role of the police to gather evidence
Aim to provide the evidence required to convince a court that
the accused or defendant is guilty to the standard of beyond
reasonable doubt
Involves taking witness statements
Evidence can be physical, electronic and oral regulated by
the Evidence Act 1995 (Commonwealth)
Use of Technology:
Allows for the creation of databases that can be used for
storing evidence
Frequently used by police to gather evidence
E.g. surveillance technology, mobile phones, DNA evidence
Crimes (Forensic Procedures) Act 2000
Search and Seizure:
NSW police have broad powers to stop and search any person
where they believe on reasonable grounds that they are
carrying anything stolen
Allow the police to apply for warrant
Police can then seize and detain any of these subjects, if
discovered
The police have the right to search an arrested person
LEPRA Amendment (Search Powers) Act 2009 law reform
that allows for cover searches for any crime that has a penalty
of 7 years or more.
Use of Warrants:
A warrant is a legal document issued by a magistrate or judge
which authorises a police officer to perform a particular act e.g. to
make an arrest, conduct a search
Arrest and Charge, Summons and Warrants
ARREST AND CHARGE:
Depriving a person of their liberty to be free, therefore the
arrest must be by the book and lawful
The conditions under which the police arrest a person are
contained in LEPRA
Police must issue a caution at the time of the arrest
Charge: formal complaint or allegation that a person has
breached criminal law and therefore has a question to answer
before the court.
Police need to be careful to choose the correct charge that is
consistent with the evidence
Prove any charges beyond reasonable doubt
To sustain a charge in court evidence must be compelling
Summons:
A legal notice that is served on a person requesting their
attendance in court
LEPRA sets out the lawful conditions under which a suspect
can be detained for questioning and for the purpose of further
investigation
Detention:
A person is detained or held
Interrogation:
Rights to suspects:
Right to silence
Right to caution
Right to legal support
Right to be told why they are being detained/under arrest
Right to communication
Right to have illegal evidence to be dismissed
BAIL OR REMAND
Bail Act 1978 (NSW)
Once charged, the police will be required to bring the accused
before a court or authorised officer as soon as practicable for
a bail hearing
Bail refers to the temporary release of an accused person
awaiting trial, sometimes on particular conditions
Further conditions are imposed if the person presents a flight
risk
Changes to the Bail Act 1978 since 2002 have made it more difficult
to get bail
A very strict test for granting bail to persons accused of
murder or who is a repeat offender
Limit on amount of bail applications that can be made to a
court
To provide a greater protection to the community
The importance of bail:
Bail is very important because, until the court hearing is over,
the defendant is presumed innocent
If a person is remanded, that means a person presumed
innocent is kept in prison
Delays in the justice system thus bail is essential
REMAND
Remand refers to a period spent in custody awaiting trial at a later
date/bail is refused
Person held on remand and given custodial sentence later will have
that time taken off the sentence if it has already been served in
remand
3.CRIMINAL TRIAL PROCESS:
Pleas, Charge Negotiation
The plea:
Formal statement of guilt or innocence entered into by the
accused
Plea hearing: in front of judge the accused can either plea
guilty or not guilty, or enter no plea, which is taken to mean
not guilty
Guilty plea: no question about the accuseds guilt, the matter
goes straight to sentencing. Does not require witnesses to
give testimony. Those who plea guilty generally get a
discount on their sentence
No guilty plea: the guilt of the accused is not assured. The
case must go to trial and the prosecutor is left to convince the
jury of the accuseds guilt while the defence argues that the
accused did not commit the crime
Charge Negotiation: